The perception changed when you started to attack Eastern Orthodox Christianity
Sorry sir, but I did not attack Eastern Orthodox Christianity. I attacked the pathetic polemics of extremist Eastern Orthodox Christians against Oriental Orthodox Christianity.
There is One Orthodox Faith, and I determine one’s Orthodoxy on valid criterion pertaining to essential doctrine, which thus does not preclude the Chalcedonian Church regardless of our differences - which I understand, and have thoroughly argued, as merely pertaining to historical issues regarding the status of councils (local Orthodox vs. Ecumenical) and the appropriateness, reliability, validity of semantic preferences; so the attack is not on your Orthodoxy, the attack is on your unsubstantial denial of my Orthodoxy based on the above mentioned issues. But again, I repeat my essentially implied purpose throughout all of this; I’m not here to change anyone’s subjective beliefs - but only to expose them to the raw truth and reason which conflicts with and contradicts their polemical position, and which should ultimately convict their conscious next time they decide to publically throw around the same false charges; hopefully realizing from their past experience, that to do so would be nothing less than dishonest.
If Bob wants to view me a heretic as Ahmed wants to view me a kaffir, then I am happy for both Bob and Ahmed. However if Bob wants to arrogantly voice his opinion axiomatically without feeling the need to justify any inherent presuppositions in his charges against me, and if Ahmed wants to arrogantly voice his opinion axiomatically based on blatantly false presuppositions, then I will proclaim the truth against the two in a manner I see fit; and if I dish it out equally, it is clear double standards if Ahmed’s friend Joe, applauds my manner in dealing with Bob, and rebukes and criticizes my manner in dealing with Joe. The fact he agrees with the subject matter of my arguments against Bob, whilst disagreeing with the subject matter of my arguments against Ahmed, does not reasonably justify his double standards.
In any event, the fact of the matter is, I was not criticized for content (this was not the basis of the justification for deleting my post, though it is obviously the motive), but for the form/manner. That the subject matter determine how lenient or severe my form/manner is dealt with, is blatant inconsistency, discrimination, bias, and hypocrisy, especially in light of the fact that apparently this website is a home for Orthodox Christians; a title understood and recognized by the sound and prudent minded administrators as being legitimately applicable to the Oriental Orthodox Church as much as it is for the Eastern Orthodox Church.
I repeat, this is NOT even an exclusively EASTERN Orthodox website - If I am mistaken, then I will wait for the official administrators; Anastasios, Robert, Mor Ephrem (an OO himself) to correct me.
By the way, you know many EO Christians systematically call the Oriental Orthodox Churches as "Monophysite", and you complain about it; but you systematically call Mr Barnes' website, which is much-regarded by no few posters here, as "Orthodox Mis-information Center".
And here is the crunch my friendGÃƒÆ’Ã¢â‚¬Â¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Âª.
I have PROVEN that such a website spreads misinformation. Essentially the same claims that they throw against The Orthodoxy of the Oriental Church have been dealt with on this very forum sir, by the very puppets of this website in the first place. I have JUSTIFIED my charge of mis-information. Do you really need me to link you to the relevant threads and posts?
In contrast, I have not yet seen ONE person on this forum justify the monophysite claim. I have been BEGGING someoneGÃƒÆ’Ã¢â‚¬Â¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ÂªANYONE, to show me where My Church has ever confessed to a) a confusion of the two natures of Christ, b) a denial of the continuing reality of one or the other, or c) a denial of the divine and/or human’s respective consubstantiality with the Father and mankind. These are the defining attributes of monophysitism, deal with it - shut me up already and show me when, where, and who confessed this. There is no evidence to support you my friend; In fact I dare you to even prove that Eutyches himself ever held to the Eutychian heresy! (My church condemned Eutyches long ago btw, but just like his condemnation by your Church - it is based on the assumption he truly adhered to this heresy - the very shaken assumption Chalcedon was based upon in the first place.)