OrthodoxChristianity.net
November 26, 2014, 01:49:23 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Reminder: No political discussions in the public fora.  If you do not have access to the private Politics Forum, please send a PM to Fr. George.
 
   Home   Help Calendar Contact Treasury Tags Login Register  
Pages: 1   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Nutty Professor  (Read 1769 times) Average Rating: 0
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
KostaNY
Member
***
Offline Offline

Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Posts: 81


« on: April 05, 2006, 10:36:56 AM »

http://www.sas.org/tcs/weeklyIssues_2006/2006-04-07/feature1p/index.html

Recently citizen scientist Forrest Mims told me about a speech he heard at the Texas Academy of Science during which the speaker, a world-renowned ecologist, advocated for the extermination of 90 percent of the human species in a most horrible and painful manner. Apparently at the speaker's direction, the speech was not video taped by the Academy and so Forrest's may be the only record of what was said. Forrest's account of what he witnessed chilled my soul. Astonishingly, Forrest reports that many of the Academy members present gave the speaker a standing ovation. To date, the Academy has not moved to sanction the speaker or distance itself from the speaker's remarks.

If the professional community has lost its sense of moral outrage when one if their own openly calls for the slow and painful extermination of over 5 billion human beings, then it falls upon the amateur community to be the conscience of science.

Forrest, who is a member of the Texas Academy and chairs its Environmental Science Section, told me he would be unable to describe the speech in The Citizen Scientist because he has protested the speech to the Academy and he serves as Editor of The Citizen Scientist. Therefore, to preclude a possible conflict of interest, I have directed Forrest to describe what he observed and his reactions in this special feature, for which I have served as editor and which is being released a week ahead of our normal publication schedule.








Meeting Doctor Doom

Forrest M. Mims III
Copyright 2006 by Forrest M. Mims III.

 Â There is always something special about science meetings. The 109th meeting of the Texas Academy of Science at Lamar University in Beaumont on 3-5 March 2006 was especially exciting for me, because a student and his professor presented the results of a DNA study I suggested to them last year. How fulfilling to see the baldcypress ( Taxodium distichum ) leaves we collected last summer and my tree ring photographs transformed into a first class scientific presentation that's nearly ready to submit to a scientific journal (Brian Iken and Dr. Deanna McCullough, "Bald Cypress of the Texas Hill Country: Taxonomically Unique?" 109th Meeting of the Texas Academy of Science Program and Abstracts [ PDF ], Poster P59, p. 84, 2006).

But there was a gravely disturbing side to that otherwise scientifically significant meeting, for I watched in amazement as a few hundred members of the Texas Academy of Science rose to their feet and gave a standing ovation to a speech that enthusiastically advocated the elimination of 90 percent of Earth's population by airborne Ebola. The speech was given by Dr. Eric R. Pianka (Fig. 1), the University of Texas evolutionary ecologist and lizard expert who the Academy named the 2006 Distinguished Texas Scientist.

Something curious occurred a minute before Pianka began speaking. An official of the Academy approached a video camera operator at the front of the auditorium and engaged him in animated conversation. The camera operator did not look pleased as he pointed the lens of the big camera to the ceiling and slowly walked away.

This curious incident came to mind a few minutes later when Professor Pianka began his speech by explaining that the general public is not yet ready to hear what he was about to tell us. Because of many years of experience as a writer and editor, Pianka's strange introduction and the TV camera incident raised a red flag in my mind. Suddenly I forgot that I was a member of the Texas Academy of Science and chairman of its Environmental Science Section. Instead, I grabbed a notepad so I could take on the role of science reporter.

One of Pianka's earliest points was a condemnation of anthropocentrism, or the idea that humankind occupies a privileged position in the Universe. He told a story about how a neighbor asked him what good the lizards are that he studies. He answered, “What good are you?”

Pianka hammered his point home by exclaiming, “We're no better than bacteria!”

Pianka then began laying out his concerns about how human overpopulation is ruining the Earth. He presented a doomsday scenario in which he claimed that the sharp increase in human population since the beginning of the industrial age is devastating the planet. He warned that quick steps must be taken to restore the planet before it's too late.

Saving the Earth with Ebola

Professor Pianka said the Earth as we know it will not survive without drastic measures. Then, and without presenting any data to justify this number, he asserted that the only feasible solution to saving the Earth is to reduce the population to 10 percent of the present number.

He then showed solutions for reducing the world's population in the form of a slide depicting the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse. War and famine would not do, he explained. Instead, disease offered the most efficient and fastest way to kill the billions that must soon die if the population crisis is to be solved.

Pianka then displayed a slide showing rows of human skulls, one of which had red lights flashing from its eye sockets.

AIDS is not an efficient killer, he explained, because it is too slow. His favorite candidate for eliminating 90 percent of the world's population is airborne Ebola ( Ebola Reston ), because it is both highly lethal and it kills in days, instead of years. However, Professor Pianka did not mention that Ebola victims die a slow and torturous death as the virus initiates a cascade of biological calamities inside the victim that eventually liquefy the internal organs.

After praising the Ebola virus for its efficiency at killing, Pianka paused, leaned over the lectern, looked at us and carefully said, “We've got airborne 90 percent mortality in humans. Killing humans. Think about that.”

With his slide of human skulls towering on the screen behind him, Professor Pianka was deadly serious. The audience that had been applauding some of his statements now sat silent.

After a dramatic pause, Pianka returned to politics and environmentalism. But he revisited his call for mass death when he reflected on the oil situation.

“And the fossil fuels are running out,” he said, “so I think we may have to cut back to two billion, which would be about one-third as many people.” So the oil crisis alone may require eliminating two-third's of the world's population.

How soon must the mass dying begin if Earth is to be saved? Apparently fairly soon, for Pianka suggested he might be around when the killer disease goes to work. He was born in 1939, and his lengthy obituary appears on his web site.

When Pianka finished his remarks, the audience applauded. It wasn't merely a smattering of polite clapping that audiences diplomatically reserve for poor or boring speakers. It was a loud, vigorous and enthusiastic applause.

Questions for Dr. Doom

Then came the question and answer session, in which Professor Pianka stated that other diseases are also efficient killers.

The audience laughed when he said, “You know, the bird flu's good, too.” They laughed again when he proposed, with a discernable note of glee in his voice that, “We need to sterilize everybody on the Earth.”

After noting that the audience did not represent the general population, a questioner asked, "What kind of reception have you received as you have presented these ideas to other audiences that are not representative of us?"

Pianka replied, "I speak to the converted!"

Pianka responded to more questions by condemning politicians in general and Al Gore by name, because they do not address the population problem and "...because they deceive the public in every way they can to stay in power."

He spoke glowingly of the police state in China that enforces their one-child policy. He said, "Smarter people have fewer kids." He said those who don't have a conscience about the Earth will inherit the Earth, "...because those who care make fewer babies and those that didn't care made more babies." He said we will evolve as uncaring people, and "I think IQs are falling for the same reason, too."

With this, the questioning was over. Immediately almost every scientist, professor and college student present stood to their feet and vigorously applauded the man who had enthusiastically endorsed the elimination of 90 percent of the human population. Some even cheered. Dozens then mobbed the professor at the lectern to extend greetings and ask questions. It was necessary to wait a while before I could get close enough to take some photographs (Fig. 1).

I was assigned to judge a paper in a grad student competition after the speech. On the way, three professors dismissed Pianka as a crank. While waiting to enter the competition room, a group of a dozen Lamar University students expressed outrage over the Pianka speech.

Yet five hours later, the distinguished leaders of the Texas Academy of Science presented Pianka with a plaque in recognition of his being named 2006 Distinguished Texas Scientist. When the banquet hall filled with more than 400 people responded with enthusiastic applause, I walked out in protest.

Corresponding with Dr. Doom

Recently I exchanged a number of e-mails with Pianka. I pointed out to him that one might infer his death wish was really aimed at Africans, for Ebola is found only in Central Africa. He replied that Ebola does not discriminate, kills everyone and could spread to Europe and the the Americas by a single infected airplane passenger.

In his last e-mail, Pianka wrote that I completely fail to understand his arguments. So I did a check and found verification of my interpretation of his remarks on his own web site. In a student evaluation of a 2004 course he taught, one of Professor Pianka's students wrote, "Though I agree that convervation [sic] biology is of utmost importance to the world, I do not think that preaching that 90% of the human population should die of ebola [sic] is the most effective means of encouraging conservation awareness." (Go here and scroll down to just before the Fall 2005 evaluation section near the end.)

Yet the majority of his student reviews were favorable, with one even saying, “ I worship Dr. Pianka.”

The 45-minute lecture before the Texas Academy of Science converted a university biology senior into a Pianka disciple, who then published a blog that seriously supports Pianka's mass death wish.

Dangerous Times

Let me now remove my reporter's hat for a moment and tell you what I think. We live in dangerous times. The national security of many countries is at risk. Science has become tainted by highly publicized cases of misconduct and fraud.

Must now we worry that a Pianka-worshipping former student might someday become a professional biologist or physician with access to the most deadly strains of viruses and bacteria? I believe that airborne Ebola is unlikely to threaten the world outside of Central Africa. But scientists have regenerated the 1918 Spanish flu virus that killed 50 million people. There is concern that small pox might someday return. And what other terrible plagues are waiting out there in the natural world to cross the species barrier and to which scientists will one day have access?

Meanwhile, I still can't get out of my mind the pleasant spring day in Texas when a few hundred scientists of the Texas Academy of Science gave a standing ovation for a speaker who they heard advocate for the slow and torturous death of over five billion human beings.  

« Last Edit: April 05, 2006, 01:06:19 PM by SouthSerb99 » Logged
Elisha
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 4,462


« Reply #1 on: April 05, 2006, 12:51:31 PM »

Nutty?  Trying freaking scary!
Logged
serb1389
Lord, remember me when you come into your Kingdom!
Global Moderator
Merarches
******
Offline Offline

Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Greek Orthodox Metropolis of San Francisco
Posts: 8,428


Michał Kalina's biggest fan

FrNPantic
WWW
« Reply #2 on: April 05, 2006, 01:46:53 PM »

pre-meditated murder?  Anyone?  Has this guy been arested?  Of course not!  "science is just a theory" but he keeps talking about how this WILL happen.

Talk about weapons of mass destruction...
Logged

I got nothing.
I forgot the maps
March 27th and May 30th 2010 were my Ordination dates, please forgive everything before that
PeterTheAleut
The Right Blowhard Peter the Furtive of Yetts O'Muckhart
Section Moderator
Protospatharios
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 32,922


Lord, have mercy on the Christians in Mosul!


« Reply #3 on: April 05, 2006, 02:15:25 PM »

Nutty?  Trying freaking scary!

I would use the term "demonic!"  Shocked I certainly hope that no one takes this quack seriously.  (Of course, people took the philosophies of Nietzche and Marx seriously.)
Logged
augustin717
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: The other ROC
Posts: 5,635



« Reply #4 on: April 05, 2006, 02:24:43 PM »

Well, is he willing to begin the process with him Huh
Logged
annaspencer
Member
***
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Russian Orthodox
Posts: 102


« Reply #5 on: April 05, 2006, 03:02:51 PM »

If this guy and his followers believe that the more people who die ASAP, the better, why haven't they volunteered to go first? Why are they and their families still around? It seems that other people in other countries are what this guy's arguements are aimed at.
Also, as people have pointed out, this man is seriously advocating killing people, don't you have terrorism laws or conspiracy incitement laws in America that he could be charged under?
Logged
KostaNY
Member
***
Offline Offline

Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Posts: 81


« Reply #6 on: April 06, 2006, 05:20:07 AM »

I would use the term "demonic!"  Shocked I certainly hope that no one takes this quack seriously.  (Of course, people took the philosophies of Nietzche and Marx seriously.)


The guy is a nut, he actually believes in what hes saying. He doesn't think its wrong, in his mind hes saving the world. What really disturbs me is the 400 people at the academy that got up and appluaded and gave him a standing ovation. The evil that must have been circulating in that place, the devil himself probably had a front row seat.
Logged
Fr. George
formerly "Cleveland"
Administrator
Stratopedarches
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox (Catholic) Christian
Jurisdiction: GOA - Metropolis of Pittsburgh
Posts: 20,110


May the Lord bless you and keep you always!


« Reply #7 on: April 06, 2006, 06:58:59 AM »

Another cult masquerading as science.  There is nothing scientific about elimination of human beings....
Logged

"The man who doesn't read good books has no advantage over the one who can't read them." Mark Twain
---------------------
Ordained on 17 & 18-Oct 2009. Please forgive me if earlier posts are poorly worded or incorrect in any way.
serb1389
Lord, remember me when you come into your Kingdom!
Global Moderator
Merarches
******
Offline Offline

Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Greek Orthodox Metropolis of San Francisco
Posts: 8,428


Michał Kalina's biggest fan

FrNPantic
WWW
« Reply #8 on: April 06, 2006, 02:07:17 PM »

Quote
There is nothing scientific about elimination of human beings....

Not according to our favorite philanothropists Hitler, Stalin, (the rest of the Iron Curtain), However many chinese dictators you want to mention, etc. etc.

Logged

I got nothing.
I forgot the maps
March 27th and May 30th 2010 were my Ordination dates, please forgive everything before that
Elisha
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 4,462


« Reply #9 on: April 06, 2006, 02:12:49 PM »

If this guy and his followers believe that the more people who die ASAP, the better, why haven't they volunteered to go first? Why are they and their families still around? It seems that other people in other countries are what this guy's arguements are aimed at.
Also, as people have pointed out, this man is seriously advocating killing people, don't you have terrorism laws or conspiracy incitement laws in America that he could be charged under?

Because they're the only "enlightened" ones who realize the "solution".  They need to stay to make sure it gets implemented.  Roll Eyes
Logged
JoeS
(aka StMarkEofE)
Site Supporter
OC.net guru
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Catholic
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 1,122


Global Warming Enthusiast.


« Reply #10 on: April 06, 2006, 02:40:49 PM »

Professors spend entirely too much time in their academic self inflicted cocoon and have no idea what the real world is all about.  Was he funded by tax dollars to come to his conclusions?

Get a real job professor!
Logged
PeterTheAleut
The Right Blowhard Peter the Furtive of Yetts O'Muckhart
Section Moderator
Protospatharios
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 32,922


Lord, have mercy on the Christians in Mosul!


« Reply #11 on: April 06, 2006, 05:35:31 PM »

Professors spend entirely too much time in their academic self inflicted cocoon and have no idea what the real world is all about.  Was he funded by tax dollars to come to his conclusions?

Get a real job professor!

Get a real professor!  Grin
Logged
Fr. George
formerly "Cleveland"
Administrator
Stratopedarches
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox (Catholic) Christian
Jurisdiction: GOA - Metropolis of Pittsburgh
Posts: 20,110


May the Lord bless you and keep you always!


« Reply #12 on: April 06, 2006, 06:34:40 PM »

It is within the nature of academia that nutjobs like this are allowed to thrive - the freedoms afforded by the open nature of educational institutions.  As long as he does his research, brings in grants, and brings in students, he's okay!  I wonder what UT will do now that they know he's a supporter of genocide.  

{sarcasm}
(wait, can't he be brought up before the Hague now?  ha!  all we have to do is tell them that he's serbian, and they'll go after him...) {/sarcasm}
Logged

"The man who doesn't read good books has no advantage over the one who can't read them." Mark Twain
---------------------
Ordained on 17 & 18-Oct 2009. Please forgive me if earlier posts are poorly worded or incorrect in any way.
serb1389
Lord, remember me when you come into your Kingdom!
Global Moderator
Merarches
******
Offline Offline

Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Greek Orthodox Metropolis of San Francisco
Posts: 8,428


Michał Kalina's biggest fan

FrNPantic
WWW
« Reply #13 on: April 09, 2006, 09:59:38 PM »

You know technically he wouldn't even have to tell them that he's serbian, someone could accuse him of being serbian and that would be enough.  No process or proof needed.  

Just like his theory...it sounds nice but you couldn't support air with it.  
Logged

I got nothing.
I forgot the maps
March 27th and May 30th 2010 were my Ordination dates, please forgive everything before that
Justin Kissel
Formerly Asteriktos
Protospatharios
****************
Offline Offline

Posts: 30,205


that is not the teaching of...


« Reply #14 on: April 10, 2006, 01:16:51 AM »

There is an essay by Frank J. Tipler that touches on some of this. The essay is titled Refereed Journals: Do They Insure Quality or Enforce Orthodoxy?, and can be found in the book Uncommon Dissent: Intellectuals Who Find Darwinism Unconvincing (pp. 115-130). Now I know the title of the book (and the essay for that matter) might set up some red flags for some folks, but I do think that thoughts of Mr. Tipler on professors is probably valid.

Essentially, he said that a century ago (and earlier) professors would write for publication mostly as a labor of love. Maybe there were some who got a few dollars out of it, or thought they could make a name for themselves, but generally they could expect very little in return for many hours of hard work. However, in today's academic world, professors who can bring attention or money in to a university (through the media, donors giving large grants, etc.) have a better chance of getting ahead, and thus making a name for yourself and getting your work out is much more important.

It doesn't matter whether your work is schlock, because most people will buy a book based on sensationalism and not on accuracy (just ask Dan Brown), and also because attention and funding is more likely to come to people (and thus universities) who make iconoclastic claims than it is to those who write essays endorsing the orthodox or mainline viewpoint. I guess the solution would be to stop paying attention to such theories... but here we are, discussing it on the internet, and (I, at least, am) buying their books.
« Last Edit: April 10, 2006, 01:17:51 AM by Asteriktos » Logged
Tags:
Pages: 1   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.076 seconds with 42 queries.