OrthodoxChristianity.net
July 23, 2014, 10:08:41 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Reminder: No political discussions in the public fora.  If you do not have access to the private Politics Forum, please send a PM to Fr. George.
 
   Home   Help Calendar Contact Treasury Tags Login Register  
Poll
Question: Was Lucian of Antioch good or bad?  (Voting closed: March 04, 2006, 02:57:38 AM)
Yeah - 0 (0%)
Nay - 0 (0%)
Total Voters: 0

Pages: 1   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Sons of Arius  (Read 1651 times) Average Rating: 0
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
WayFinder
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1


« on: February 25, 2006, 02:57:38 AM »

Wikipedia's entry on Lucian of Antioch reads in part:

Quote
The most enduring memorial of the life of Lucian ... was his influence on Biblical study. Receiving the literal sense alone, he laid stress on the need of textual accuracy and undertook to revise the Septuagint based on the original Hebrew. His edition was widely used in the 4th century (Jerome, De Vir. III. I, xxvii Praef. ad Paralip.; Adv. Rufium xxvi, Epist., 106). He also published a rescension of the New Testament.

Likewise, Benjamin George Wilkinson writes in Truth Triumphant:

Quote
The Protestant denominations are built upon that manuscript of the Greek New Testament sometimes called Textus Receptus, or the Received Text. It is that Greek New Testament from which the writings of the apostles in Greek have been translated into English, German, Dutch and other languages. During the dark ages the Received Text was practically unknown outside the Greek Church. It was restored to Christendom by the labours of that great scholar Erasmus. It is altogether too little known that the real editor of the Received Text was Lucian. None of Lucian's enemies fails to credit him with this work. Neither Lucian nor Erasmus, but rather the apostles, wrote the Greek New Testament. However, Lucian's day was an age of apostasy when a flood of depravations was systematically attempting to devastate both the Bible manuscripts and Bible theology. Origen, of the Alexandrian college, made his editions and commentaries of the Bible a secure retreat for all errors, and deformed them with philosophical speculations introducing casuistry and lying. Lucian's unrivalled success in verifying, safeguarding, and transmitting those divine writings left a heritage for which all generations should be thankful.
Quoted in [1]

And the feedback from Amazon customers who have bought copies of George Ricker Berry's Interlinear KJV Parallel New Testament in Greek and English is naught but glowing praise.  Further, the BibleStudy.org website [2] credibly claims that even the Authorized Version ("King James Version", so-called) contains errors that can be corrected by returning to the Textus Receptus.  In the same vein, it has been argued that the Authorized Version was compiled under Catholic influences [3].  This author personally found one (1) such error quite readily, in the translation of Saint Matthew 5:47, where the Greek reads ethnikos ("gentiles", from the Hebrew goy) but the AV translates it as "publican" (echoing the previous verse) [4].

Conclusion

Lucian of Antioch (who was martyred) did a great service to mankind.  To wit, Lucian = Good Guy

Yeah or Nay?


Footnotes:
[1] http://atschool.eduweb.co.uk//sbs777/vital/kjv/part1-3.html
[2] http://www.biblestudy.org/basicart/kjverror.html
[3] See for example, http://www.catholicapologetics.net/0002kjv.htm#The%20Catholic%20influence%20on%20the%20King%20James%20Version:
[4] http://www.scripture4all.org/OnlineInterlinear/Greek_Index.htm This is the Westcott - Hort translation, which is a compromise with the Roman MSS (Vaticanus, Sinaiaticus)
Logged
ozgeorge
I'll take you for who you are if you take me for everything.
Hoplitarches
*************
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Oecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople, the New Rome, the Great Church of Christ.
Posts: 16,382


My plans for retirement.


WWW
« Reply #1 on: February 25, 2006, 09:23:41 AM »

The response choices you provide are non sequitur to your poll question, and it doesn't make any sense. You ask if St. Lucian was "good or bad" and the only possible responses you allow for are "yes" or "no".
Logged

If you're living a happy life as a Christian, you're doing something wrong.
Tags:
Pages: 1   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.045 seconds with 31 queries.