Surely if what you say is fact then mainstream history resources would have material on the matter. You cannot claim that the internet is so clogged up with conspiracy sites that you cannot find any mainstream history on it.
Of course I can, and I do. And actually, I did
give you material from a mainstream source (second hand, to be sure, but hey). You more or less dismissed it out of hand.
Time has shown that the net is a great place to store primary documents and the like. On conspiracy theories it is basically pretty poor. There are a lot of people out there trying to get out "The Truth", and the forces of the
standard viewpoint are generally not so excitable, and often enough refuse to condescend to reply.
You are right to an extent, the responsibility can only lie with those that committed the crime.
However the fact that the majority were Jews is not an irrelevant accident, it must have some significance.
Even leaving off that I don't believe the thesis, it need not have any significance.
When I say that the Ottomans are responsible for centuries of occupation and repression, everyone knows I am not saying every last inhabitant of the Ottoman empire was implicated in this injustice.
Well, uh, the point is that "the Ottomans" means specifically "the political powers of that empire". Are "The Jews" a political organization? I don't think so.
In this secular world people find the idea of group loyalty, group responsibility a difficult one to fathom.
I don't find it difficult, when the gruop acts as a group. But Jews do not act as a group, so it's really quite improper to lay responsibility upon the corporately.
By your own admission the revolution was overwhelmingly carried out by Jews.
I don't admit it, and continue to deny it. But be that as it may....
If the Muslims were to carry out a coup of some sort in France, then it would be a Muslim revolution, despite the fact that 90% of Muslims inside France had no part in it, and that 100% of Muslims outside of France had no part in it.
Ah, but let's take Al Qaida, which indeed is in some sense a Muslim conspiracy. But it is so precisely as an expression of Islamic sectarianism. It has a specifically religious meaning. The Russian revolution, by constrast, was specifically anti-
Jewish in precisely that sense. Judaism was to pass away exactly as Christianity was to pass away. If there's a religion at the center of that revolution, it is Marxism, not Judaism.