Author Topic: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy  (Read 3518 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Rhinosaur

  • Homo Vivius
  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,043
  • Faith: Eastern Orthodoxy
  • Jurisdiction: OCA
In the event of a reunion, which saints do you think would be alright to venerate, and which saints do you think might be problematic?

Offline Arachne

  • Trinary Unit || Resident Bossy Boots
  • Section Moderator
  • Merarches
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,376
  • November is short. Type fast.
  • Faith: Cradle Greek Orthodox. Cope.
  • Jurisdiction: Antiochian Archdiocese, UK
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #1 on: January 15, 2018, 07:23:34 AM »
Hoo boy, that's going to be like Psyche sorting the seeds (and will take 6839 times as long...)

If the RCC abandons doctrines and practices that have accrued since the Schism, the people who introduced or supported them will no longer be considered saints. No Lourdes - no St Bernadette, no Divine Mercy - no St Faustina Kowalska, etc. But those are the minority. The vast majority of post-schism saints would have to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis for Orthodox compatibility, and they're a lot of people to go through. I wouldn't be surprised if some extent of blanket decision was adopted, potentially hingeing on monastic order affiliation.

All the above, of course, is theorising of the vaguest kind.
'Evil isn't the real threat to the world. Stupid is just as destructive as evil, maybe more so, and it's a hell of a lot more common. What we really need is a crusade against stupid. That might actually make a difference.'~Harry Dresden

~ Bookshelf ~ Jukebox ~



Offline Volnutt

  • Dull Sublunary Lover
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 13,656
  • too often left in the payment of false ponchos
  • Faith: Evangelical by default
  • Jurisdiction: Spiritually homeless
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #2 on: January 15, 2018, 08:47:05 AM »
And there's the ecclesiopolitically fraught Saints like Josaphat Kuntsevych and a good number of Popes.
Christ my God, set my heart on fire with love in You, that in its flame I may love You with all my heart, with all my mind, and with all my soul and with all my strength, and my neighbor as myself, so that by keeping Your commandments I may glorify You the Giver of every good and perfect gift. Amen.

Offline Alpo

  • Merarches
  • ***********
  • Posts: 9,754
  • Why am I still here?
  • Faith: New Calendarist
  • Jurisdiction: Priestly Society of St. John Ireland
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #3 on: January 15, 2018, 09:48:10 AM »
If the RCC abandons doctrines and practices that have accrued since the Schism, the people who introduced or supported them will no longer be considered saints.

Not necessarily. We already have several Saints who have erred on certain points. Perfection of dogmatics is not prerequisite for holiness.
I just need to find out how to say it in Slavonic!

Offline Agabus

  • The user formerly known as Agabus.
  • Section Moderator
  • Taxiarches
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,603
  • Faith: without works is dead.
  • Jurisdiction: Foolishness to the Greeks
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #4 on: January 15, 2018, 11:01:51 AM »
In the event of a reunion, which saints do you think would be alright to venerate

The vast majority, if not all, because:

We already have several Saints who have erred on certain points. Perfection of dogmatics is not prerequisite for holiness.

This isn't to say that there wouldn't have to be a conversation about new understandings/reapproporations of certain folks and their teachings.

But I expect there are a few of our own who would require similar reinterpretations. As it is, we have a few we bend over backward to make more holy than their unvarnished biographies suggest.

And yet, they are still saints and I have not problem acknowledging that.
Blessed Nazarius practiced the ascetic life. His clothes were tattered. He wore his shoes without removing them for six years.

THE OPINIONS HERE MAY NOT REFLECT THE ACTUAL OR PERCEIVED ORTHODOX CHURCH

Take a breath, read Ecclesiastes 1:9.

Offline LivenotoneviL

  • Done
  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,607
  • Intercede for my wretched soul, Saint Alban.
  • Faith: Outside the Church
  • Jurisdiction: Lost for now.
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #5 on: January 15, 2018, 12:29:25 PM »
What about Thomas Aquinas?
« Last Edit: January 15, 2018, 12:30:26 PM by LivenotoneviL »
I'm done.

Offline Rohzek

  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,249
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #6 on: January 15, 2018, 01:20:52 PM »
What about Thomas Aquinas?

Some Orthodox are fine with Thomas Aquinas, but not of the various schools of Thomism. For example, see: https://www.firstthings.com/article/2015/06/romans-81922
"Il ne faut imaginer Dieu ni trop bon, ni méchant. La justice est entre l'excès de la clémence et la cruauté, ainsi que les peines finies sont entre l'impunité et les peines éternelles." - Denise Diderot, Pensées philosophiques 1746

Offline Iconodule

  • Hoplitarches
  • *************
  • Posts: 15,292
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Patriarchate of Johnstown
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #7 on: January 15, 2018, 01:24:42 PM »
What about Thomas Aquinas?

The author of these books is a Latin by birth and so he adheres to the dogma of that church as an inheritance; this is only human. But he is a wise man, and is inferior to none of those who are perfect in wisdom among men. He wrote most especially as a commentator of Aristotelian philosophy, and of the Old and New Testaments. Most of the principal conclusions of both Sacred Theology and philosophy are seen in his books, almost all of which we have studied, both the few which were translated by others into the Greek language, and their Latin originals, some of which we ourselves have translated into our own tongue.... In all the aforesaid areas this wise man is most excellent, as the best interpreter and synthesizer in those matters in which his church agrees with ours.”- St Gennadius Scholarius
Mencius said, “Instruction makes use of many techniques. When I do not deign to instruct someone, that too is a form of instruction.”

Offline Antonis

  • Μέγα το Θαύμα!
  • Moderator
  • Archon
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,961
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #8 on: January 15, 2018, 02:37:18 PM »
What about Thomas Aquinas?

The author of these books is a Latin by birth and so he adheres to the dogma of that church as an inheritance; this is only human. But he is a wise man, and is inferior to none of those who are perfect in wisdom among men. He wrote most especially as a commentator of Aristotelian philosophy, and of the Old and New Testaments. Most of the principal conclusions of both Sacred Theology and philosophy are seen in his books, almost all of which we have studied, both the few which were translated by others into the Greek language, and their Latin originals, some of which we ourselves have translated into our own tongue.... In all the aforesaid areas this wise man is most excellent, as the best interpreter and synthesizer in those matters in which his church agrees with ours.”- St Gennadius Scholarius
I have seen Scholarios invoked frequently when it comes to Aquinas, and I believe this quote is genuine, but I would like to see where it comes from precisely and what it's context is. We already see in it some clues (bolded) that it may not be precisely what some would like it be. The reason being is that in his Examination of Certain Passages from the Latin Fathers, he traces an arc from Augustine to Aquinas and Scotus and criticizes the Latin over-reliance on reasoning in their scholastic methodology, contrasting them with St. John of Damascus (who is, ironically, also frequently invoked as a defense of such methods).

An example from that text:

"The Asiatic theologians are thought to be more precise because they did not place great trust in their intellects when speaking of things divine, neither did they cling strongly to human wisdom which Augustine overused."

And, in his Concerning the Procession of the Holy Spirit, he criticizes the scholastics for basing their theology on one or two fathers:

"We believe in the one Church, while they believe in Augustine and Jerome. The Church is the dogmas, and the teachings of our Lord, along with whatever the holy apostles and councils have decreed of one accord."
« Last Edit: January 15, 2018, 02:41:40 PM by Antonis »
"This is the one from the beginning, who seemed to be new, yet was found to be ancient and always young, being born in the hearts of the saints."
Letter to Diognetus 11.4

Offline RaphaCam

  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 7,056
  • It is honourable to reveal the works of God
    • Em Espírito e em Verdade
  • Faith: Big-O Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Exarchate of Gotham City
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #9 on: January 15, 2018, 03:10:27 PM »
What about Thomas Aquinas?

The author of these books is a Latin by birth and so he adheres to the dogma of that church as an inheritance; this is only human. But he is a wise man, and is inferior to none of those who are perfect in wisdom among men. He wrote most especially as a commentator of Aristotelian philosophy, and of the Old and New Testaments. Most of the principal conclusions of both Sacred Theology and philosophy are seen in his books, almost all of which we have studied, both the few which were translated by others into the Greek language, and their Latin originals, some of which we ourselves have translated into our own tongue.... In all the aforesaid areas this wise man is most excellent, as the best interpreter and synthesizer in those matters in which his church agrees with ours.”- St Gennadius Scholarius
:-*
"May the Lord our God remember in His kingdom all Holy Catholic Apostolic Church, which heralds the Word of Truth and fearlessly offers and distributes the Holy Oblation despite human deficiencies and persecutions moved by the powers of this world, in all time and unto the ages of ages."

May the Blessed Light shine Forth

Offline Volnutt

  • Dull Sublunary Lover
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 13,656
  • too often left in the payment of false ponchos
  • Faith: Evangelical by default
  • Jurisdiction: Spiritually homeless
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #10 on: January 15, 2018, 03:14:42 PM »
What about Thomas Aquinas?

The author of these books is a Latin by birth and so he adheres to the dogma of that church as an inheritance; this is only human. But he is a wise man, and is inferior to none of those who are perfect in wisdom among men. He wrote most especially as a commentator of Aristotelian philosophy, and of the Old and New Testaments. Most of the principal conclusions of both Sacred Theology and philosophy are seen in his books, almost all of which we have studied, both the few which were translated by others into the Greek language, and their Latin originals, some of which we ourselves have translated into our own tongue.... In all the aforesaid areas this wise man is most excellent, as the best interpreter and synthesizer in those matters in which his church agrees with ours.”- St Gennadius Scholarius
I have seen Scholarios invoked frequently when it comes to Aquinas, and I believe this quote is genuine, but I would like to see where it comes from precisely and what it's context is. We already see in it some clues (bolded) that it may not be precisely what some would like it be. The reason being is that in his Examination of Certain Passages from the Latin Fathers, he traces an arc from Augustine to Aquinas and Scotus and criticizes the Latin over-reliance on reasoning in their scholastic methodology, contrasting them with St. John of Damascus (who is, ironically, also frequently invoked as a defense of such methods).

An example from that text:

"The Asiatic theologians are thought to be more precise because they did not place great trust in their intellects when speaking of things divine, neither did they cling strongly to human wisdom which Augustine overused."

And, in his Concerning the Procession of the Holy Spirit, he criticizes the scholastics for basing their theology on one or two fathers:

"We believe in the one Church, while they believe in Augustine and Jerome. The Church is the dogmas, and the teachings of our Lord, along with whatever the holy apostles and councils have decreed of one accord."

I think you're missing the forest for the trees. The point I see in that quote is not necessarily "Aquinas is a-ok" it's "Aquinas was a holy and diligent man even if he was wrong about some things."
Christ my God, set my heart on fire with love in You, that in its flame I may love You with all my heart, with all my mind, and with all my soul and with all my strength, and my neighbor as myself, so that by keeping Your commandments I may glorify You the Giver of every good and perfect gift. Amen.

Offline JoeS2

  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,662
  • St. Mark Defender of the true Faith (old CAF guy)
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #11 on: January 15, 2018, 03:51:22 PM »
Any recognition by Orthodoxy I think it would depend on their theology post Schism....
Even Blessed Augustine was borderline at times

Offline Antonis

  • Μέγα το Θαύμα!
  • Moderator
  • Archon
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,961
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #12 on: January 15, 2018, 04:21:37 PM »
What about Thomas Aquinas?

The author of these books is a Latin by birth and so he adheres to the dogma of that church as an inheritance; this is only human. But he is a wise man, and is inferior to none of those who are perfect in wisdom among men. He wrote most especially as a commentator of Aristotelian philosophy, and of the Old and New Testaments. Most of the principal conclusions of both Sacred Theology and philosophy are seen in his books, almost all of which we have studied, both the few which were translated by others into the Greek language, and their Latin originals, some of which we ourselves have translated into our own tongue.... In all the aforesaid areas this wise man is most excellent, as the best interpreter and synthesizer in those matters in which his church agrees with ours.”- St Gennadius Scholarius
I have seen Scholarios invoked frequently when it comes to Aquinas, and I believe this quote is genuine, but I would like to see where it comes from precisely and what it's context is. We already see in it some clues (bolded) that it may not be precisely what some would like it be. The reason being is that in his Examination of Certain Passages from the Latin Fathers, he traces an arc from Augustine to Aquinas and Scotus and criticizes the Latin over-reliance on reasoning in their scholastic methodology, contrasting them with St. John of Damascus (who is, ironically, also frequently invoked as a defense of such methods).

An example from that text:

"The Asiatic theologians are thought to be more precise because they did not place great trust in their intellects when speaking of things divine, neither did they cling strongly to human wisdom which Augustine overused."

And, in his Concerning the Procession of the Holy Spirit, he criticizes the scholastics for basing their theology on one or two fathers:

"We believe in the one Church, while they believe in Augustine and Jerome. The Church is the dogmas, and the teachings of our Lord, along with whatever the holy apostles and councils have decreed of one accord."

I think you're missing the forest for the trees. The point I see in that quote is not necessarily "Aquinas is a-ok" it's "Aquinas was a holy and diligent man even if he was wrong about some things."
I'm not seeing "holy" in there, but otherwise we are in agreement.
"This is the one from the beginning, who seemed to be new, yet was found to be ancient and always young, being born in the hearts of the saints."
Letter to Diognetus 11.4

Offline LivenotoneviL

  • Done
  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,607
  • Intercede for my wretched soul, Saint Alban.
  • Faith: Outside the Church
  • Jurisdiction: Lost for now.
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #13 on: January 15, 2018, 04:30:00 PM »
What about Ignatius of Loyola?
« Last Edit: January 15, 2018, 04:30:09 PM by LivenotoneviL »
I'm done.

Offline 123abc

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 48
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #14 on: January 15, 2018, 05:10:36 PM »
What about Ignatius of Loyola?

His exercises which encourage the imagination would be problematic at best and considered prelest at worst.

Offline Iconodule

  • Hoplitarches
  • *************
  • Posts: 15,292
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Patriarchate of Johnstown
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #15 on: January 15, 2018, 06:41:14 PM »
Our entire cycle of services encourages the imagination. Oops.
Mencius said, “Instruction makes use of many techniques. When I do not deign to instruct someone, that too is a form of instruction.”

Offline Volnutt

  • Dull Sublunary Lover
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 13,656
  • too often left in the payment of false ponchos
  • Faith: Evangelical by default
  • Jurisdiction: Spiritually homeless
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #16 on: January 15, 2018, 07:02:45 PM »
Our entire cycle of services encourages the imagination. Oops.
'

Perhaps it could at least be said that they don't encourage you to put yourself in scenes with Jesus the way some Catholic devotions seem to?
Christ my God, set my heart on fire with love in You, that in its flame I may love You with all my heart, with all my mind, and with all my soul and with all my strength, and my neighbor as myself, so that by keeping Your commandments I may glorify You the Giver of every good and perfect gift. Amen.

Offline LivenotoneviL

  • Done
  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,607
  • Intercede for my wretched soul, Saint Alban.
  • Faith: Outside the Church
  • Jurisdiction: Lost for now.
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #17 on: January 15, 2018, 07:08:32 PM »
What about Margaret Mary Alacoque?
(Once again, making no judgment on this woman - I hope she's in heaven - but is her spiritual life and desires consistent with Orthodoxy?)
« Last Edit: January 15, 2018, 07:13:18 PM by LivenotoneviL »
I'm done.

Offline Iconodule

  • Hoplitarches
  • *************
  • Posts: 15,292
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Patriarchate of Johnstown
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #18 on: January 15, 2018, 07:15:40 PM »
Our entire cycle of services encourages the imagination. Oops.
'

Perhaps it could at least be said that they don't encourage you to put yourself in scenes with Jesus the way some Catholic devotions seem to?

Maybe, but that’s not the same as a flat condemnation of imagination. Then we also sing stuff like this throughout the year: “Let us run then to the Jordan. Let us all see how John baptizes a sinless and uncreated Head.“
Mencius said, “Instruction makes use of many techniques. When I do not deign to instruct someone, that too is a form of instruction.”

Offline RaphaCam

  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 7,056
  • It is honourable to reveal the works of God
    • Em Espírito e em Verdade
  • Faith: Big-O Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Exarchate of Gotham City
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #19 on: January 15, 2018, 07:21:01 PM »
Frankly, I don't think anyone outside the Orthodox Church should be venerated as a saint, so even as I think the claim that the West simply went gracelss at 1054 (not only setting an arbitrary date for most of the West, but also ignoring grey areas such as the British Isles and Sardinia) is far-fetched, I do believe the whole West fell at some moment at the Late Middle Ages, so I won't hold any Roman Catholic saints in my book beyond mere outsider religious admiration.

Maybe one could paint haloless icons of Francis of Assisi just like there are those of Greek Pagan philosophers out there.  :P
« Last Edit: January 15, 2018, 07:22:13 PM by RaphaCam »
"May the Lord our God remember in His kingdom all Holy Catholic Apostolic Church, which heralds the Word of Truth and fearlessly offers and distributes the Holy Oblation despite human deficiencies and persecutions moved by the powers of this world, in all time and unto the ages of ages."

May the Blessed Light shine Forth

Offline LivenotoneviL

  • Done
  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,607
  • Intercede for my wretched soul, Saint Alban.
  • Faith: Outside the Church
  • Jurisdiction: Lost for now.
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #20 on: January 15, 2018, 07:24:07 PM »
Frankly, I don't think anyone outside the Orthodox Church should be venerated as a saint, so even as I think the claim that the West simply went gracelss at 1054 (not only setting an arbitrary date for most of the West, but also ignoring grey areas such as the British Isles and Sardinia) is far-fetched, I do believe the whole West fell at some moment at the Late Middle Ages, so I won't hold any Roman Catholic saints in my book beyond mere outsider religious admiration.

Maybe one could paint haloless icons of Francis of Assisi just like there are those of Greek Pagan philosophers out there.  :P

+1
I'm done.

Offline Mor Ephrem

  • A highly skilled and trained Freudian feminist slut
  • Section Moderator
  • Hypatos
  • *****
  • Posts: 34,711
    • OrthodoxChristianity.net
  • Faith: Mercenary Freudianism
  • Jurisdiction: Texas Feminist Coptic
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #21 on: January 15, 2018, 07:37:20 PM »
Our entire cycle of services encourages the imagination. Oops.

Not true!!  The holy fathers did all the imagining for us sinners!

Offline Antonis

  • Μέγα το Θαύμα!
  • Moderator
  • Archon
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,961
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #22 on: January 15, 2018, 07:54:56 PM »
What about Margaret Mary Alacoque?
(Once again, making no judgment on this woman - I hope she's in heaven - but is her spiritual life and desires consistent with Orthodoxy?)
I'm not sure it's very profitable to dedicate a thread to listing RC saints only in order to poo-poo this or that element of their spiritual lives. They sought God with more fervor than I do and by-and-large did the best with what was available to them. More than anything, they are an indictment against us Orthodox who have been given a larger share of talents and have not multiplied them accordingly. It's probably best to leave it at RaphaCam's sentiments.
« Last Edit: January 15, 2018, 07:57:21 PM by Antonis »
"This is the one from the beginning, who seemed to be new, yet was found to be ancient and always young, being born in the hearts of the saints."
Letter to Diognetus 11.4

Offline Sharbel

  • Glory to God in all things!
  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,498
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Greek
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #23 on: January 15, 2018, 11:21:05 PM »
In the event of a reunion, which saints do you think would be alright to venerate, and which saints do you think might be problematic?
Myself.
Sanctus Deus
ܩܕܝܫܐ ܐܢ̱ܬ ܠܐ ܡܝܘܬܐ
Άγιος ο Θεός

Offline Antonis

  • Μέγα το Θαύμα!
  • Moderator
  • Archon
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,961
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #24 on: January 16, 2018, 12:28:20 AM »
In the event of a reunion, which saints do you think would be alright to venerate, and which saints do you think might be problematic?
Myself.
I know some rather conservative Lebanese Orthodox with a devotion to you.  ;)
"This is the one from the beginning, who seemed to be new, yet was found to be ancient and always young, being born in the hearts of the saints."
Letter to Diognetus 11.4

Offline RaphaCam

  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 7,056
  • It is honourable to reveal the works of God
    • Em Espírito e em Verdade
  • Faith: Big-O Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Exarchate of Gotham City
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #25 on: January 16, 2018, 12:43:04 AM »
In the event of a reunion, which saints do you think would be alright to venerate, and which saints do you think might be problematic?
Myself.
I know some rather conservative Lebanese Orthodox with a devotion to you.  ;)
Are we talking about the original St. Sharbel or is this a Mor-style hit line?
"May the Lord our God remember in His kingdom all Holy Catholic Apostolic Church, which heralds the Word of Truth and fearlessly offers and distributes the Holy Oblation despite human deficiencies and persecutions moved by the powers of this world, in all time and unto the ages of ages."

May the Blessed Light shine Forth

Offline Antonis

  • Μέγα το Θαύμα!
  • Moderator
  • Archon
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,961
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #26 on: January 16, 2018, 12:50:55 AM »
In the event of a reunion, which saints do you think would be alright to venerate, and which saints do you think might be problematic?
Myself.
I know some rather conservative Lebanese Orthodox with a devotion to you.  ;)
Are we talking about the original St. Sharbel or is this a Mor-style hit line?
The original! But I get where you're coming from.
« Last Edit: January 16, 2018, 12:51:21 AM by Antonis »
"This is the one from the beginning, who seemed to be new, yet was found to be ancient and always young, being born in the hearts of the saints."
Letter to Diognetus 11.4

Offline Sharbel

  • Glory to God in all things!
  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,498
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Greek
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #27 on: January 16, 2018, 12:54:49 AM »
In the event of a reunion, which saints do you think would be alright to venerate, and which saints do you think might be problematic?
Myself.
I know some rather conservative Lebanese Orthodox with a devotion to you.  ;)
Are we talking about the original St. Sharbel or is this a Mor-style hit line?
The latter.

St. Sharbel is a modern Desert Father and would likely be embraced by all Orthodox much like he already is by the Syrian and Greek Orthodox in Lebanon. 

In his canonization process, the person responsible for his case in the Vatican was astonished to read the witnesses report events of his life that mirrored those we normally read about the Desert Fathers, something that the Vatican official was a matter  of pious exaggeration, not of fact.
« Last Edit: January 16, 2018, 12:55:40 AM by Sharbel »
Sanctus Deus
ܩܕܝܫܐ ܐܢ̱ܬ ܠܐ ܡܝܘܬܐ
Άγιος ο Θεός

Offline Jackson02

  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 937
  • Faith: Genuine Orthodox Church
  • Jurisdiction: Inquiring
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #28 on: January 16, 2018, 01:02:23 AM »
This should be a simple answer: Roman Catholics no matter how their teachings may aline with Orthodoxy are still outside the church.

Offline kabane52

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #29 on: January 16, 2018, 04:57:58 AM »
Unfortunately, Jackson, the answer is not so simple as that. The history of Orthodox-Catholic relations throughout the Middle Ages show that each communion recognized some degree of ecclesial reality in the other. The Cyprianic interpretation of schism which you provide is not sound, and St. Vincent of Lerins actually uses it in the Commonitorium to show how controversies in the Church are resolved- while venerating St. Cyprian, St. Vincent says the criterion of “everywhere, always, by all” is recognized by all as having vindicated St. Stephen. I firmly believe the Orthodox Church is the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church, but this does not entail that the Roman communion possesses no ecclesiality at all- rather, she participates imperfectly in the Church of Christ. If that sounds like Lumen Gentium, it’s because Lumen Gentium was influenced by Orthodox theologians like Florovsky, Affanassieff (who was present at the Council) and Staniloae (a man of impeccable sanctity and a partner of Fr. Arsenie Boca the Wonderworker). Moreover, the rupture between East and West was gradual. Pope Urban II in 1090 spoke of the Greeks as fellow Christians and members of the Church- 40 years after 1054. The real severance emerged in the 12th-13th centuries, but it was never absolute. Chrysostom Frank has helpfully documented the history of fraternal relations between East and West throughout the Middle Ages and beyond, though I am ultimately more conservative than Frank.

To the original post, I think we can receive nearly all of them. The one I would like to expunge is Josaphat the Malevolent. But it seems to me that his cult is more of a “top-down” imposition and that he has no real organic veneration among Catholics. If we leave it alone, he would probably naturally fall off the calendar, as happened to Michael Cerularius, for example, who was canonized locally but who most certainly did not deserve it. The cult died out naturally because the Holy Spirit was not working to create it. It’s well known that a number of Orthodox saints were influenced by Western spirituality and studied the writings of Catholic saints. The quotation of St. Gennadius on Aquinas above comes from his introduction to his translation of Aquinas’ works. Certainly, St. Gennadius rejected Aquinas in some of his conclusions (Aquinas’ take on absolute simplicity, the Filioque, and the absolute and immediate jurisdiction of the Pope) but the first time you start seeing methodological critiques of Scholasticism from Orthodox is the 20th century, to my knowledge. Scholasticism isn’t problematic in method- it’s the conclusions reached by certain medieval Latin Scholastics which are problematic for Orthodoxy. (Not to say that it’s the ONLY or most important theological method, though)

Another point on St. Thomas- he appeared to an abortionist in Russia and brought about his repentance and conversion- to the Orthodox faith!

The point about imagination in Latin spirituality made above is an interesting one, and I don’t want to dismiss it. But it should be said that imaginative exercises are not absent from Orthodox spirituality. For example, in St. Porphyrios’ “Wounded by Love”, he criticizes those who accused him of prelest for visually imagining the Crucified Christ as he said the Jesus Prayer. At the very least the issue is more complex than it is sometimes presented. St. Ignatius Brianchaninov considered a number of Latin saints to have been immersed in delusion, but there are other Orthodox saints who held them in very high regard. Actually, even St. Mark of Ephesus (the popular portrait of him is just wrong) studied Latin saints and spirituality- he appealed to the writings and theology of St. Bonaventure at the Council of Florence.

At a personal level, I find a hardline position very difficult to believe, given what I have seen and heard. A friend of mine, raised Catholic, actually began his journey to Orthodoxy when he saw the divine light in a monk’s face- a Catholic monk! This inspired him to seek to understand the divine light, and he found Orthodoxy. So the fruit is good. There are countless witnesses to the clairvoyance and sanctity of Padre Pio, who displayed many of the same traits in confession as do our Orthodox saints.

So I think Rome is definitely wrong on a number of important theological points- its understanding of the Petrine office, the procession of the Spirit, and the doctrine of the divine energies. But God is incredibly merciful, and He strives to use what people have to bring them to salvation.
« Last Edit: January 16, 2018, 05:06:30 AM by kabane52 »

Offline juliogb

  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 827
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #30 on: January 16, 2018, 07:02:42 AM »
Unfortunately, Jackson, the answer is not so simple as that. The history of Orthodox-Catholic relations throughout the Middle Ages show that each communion recognized some degree of ecclesial reality in the other. The Cyprianic interpretation of schism which you provide is not sound, and St. Vincent of Lerins actually uses it in the Commonitorium to show how controversies in the Church are resolved- while venerating St. Cyprian, St. Vincent says the criterion of “everywhere, always, by all” is recognized by all as having vindicated St. Stephen. I firmly believe the Orthodox Church is the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church, but this does not entail that the Roman communion possesses no ecclesiality at all- rather, she participates imperfectly in the Church of Christ. If that sounds like Lumen Gentium, it’s because Lumen Gentium was influenced by Orthodox theologians like Florovsky, Affanassieff (who was present at the Council) and Staniloae (a man of impeccable sanctity and a partner of Fr. Arsenie Boca the Wonderworker). Moreover, the rupture between East and West was gradual. Pope Urban II in 1090 spoke of the Greeks as fellow Christians and members of the Church- 40 years after 1054. The real severance emerged in the 12th-13th centuries, but it was never absolute. Chrysostom Frank has helpfully documented the history of fraternal relations between East and West throughout the Middle Ages and beyond, though I am ultimately more conservative than Frank.

To the original post, I think we can receive nearly all of them. The one I would like to expunge is Josaphat the Malevolent. But it seems to me that his cult is more of a “top-down” imposition and that he has no real organic veneration among Catholics. If we leave it alone, he would probably naturally fall off the calendar, as happened to Michael Cerularius, for example, who was canonized locally but who most certainly did not deserve it. The cult died out naturally because the Holy Spirit was not working to create it. It’s well known that a number of Orthodox saints were influenced by Western spirituality and studied the writings of Catholic saints. The quotation of St. Gennadius on Aquinas above comes from his introduction to his translation of Aquinas’ works. Certainly, St. Gennadius rejected Aquinas in some of his conclusions (Aquinas’ take on absolute simplicity, the Filioque, and the absolute and immediate jurisdiction of the Pope) but the first time you start seeing methodological critiques of Scholasticism from Orthodox is the 20th century, to my knowledge. Scholasticism isn’t problematic in method- it’s the conclusions reached by certain medieval Latin Scholastics which are problematic for Orthodoxy. (Not to say that it’s the ONLY or most important theological method, though)

Another point on St. Thomas- he appeared to an abortionist in Russia and brought about his repentance and conversion- to the Orthodox faith!

The point about imagination in Latin spirituality made above is an interesting one, and I don’t want to dismiss it. But it should be said that imaginative exercises are not absent from Orthodox spirituality. For example, in St. Porphyrios’ “Wounded by Love”, he criticizes those who accused him of prelest for visually imagining the Crucified Christ as he said the Jesus Prayer. At the very least the issue is more complex than it is sometimes presented. St. Ignatius Brianchaninov considered a number of Latin saints to have been immersed in delusion, but there are other Orthodox saints who held them in very high regard. Actually, even St. Mark of Ephesus (the popular portrait of him is just wrong) studied Latin saints and spirituality- he appealed to the writings and theology of St. Bonaventure at the Council of Florence.

At a personal level, I find a hardline position very difficult to believe, given what I have seen and heard. A friend of mine, raised Catholic, actually began his journey to Orthodoxy when he saw the divine light in a monk’s face- a Catholic monk! This inspired him to seek to understand the divine light, and he found Orthodoxy. So the fruit is good. There are countless witnesses to the clairvoyance and sanctity of Padre Pio, who displayed many of the same traits in confession as do our Orthodox saints.

So I think Rome is definitely wrong on a number of important theological points- its understanding of the Petrine office, the procession of the Spirit, and the doctrine of the divine energies. But God is incredibly merciful, and He strives to use what people have to bring them to salvation.

Are you kabane the christian, the young lad that made some youtube videos responding the berean beacon video about the EO?

Offline 123abc

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 48
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #31 on: January 16, 2018, 07:56:41 AM »
Our entire cycle of services encourages the imagination. Oops.

Being a convert from the RCC I had certain ideas in mind when referencing 'imagination' in conjunction with the spiritual exercises of Ignatius of Loyola. Much stressed is put upon imagining oneself at the various scenes of our Lord's life as well as forming mental images of both Him and the Theotokos during prayer, two things I always thought were discouraged in Orthodoxy.

Apologies for not being more clear.

Offline kabane52

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #32 on: January 16, 2018, 08:15:21 AM »
Julio,

Haha. That’s me. I generally tell people to ignore everything I wrote or said before 2014. I cringe at a lot of my old videos, but I guess they were part of a process of learning.

Offline juliogb

  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 827
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #33 on: January 16, 2018, 09:47:13 AM »
Julio,

Haha. That’s me. I generally tell people to ignore everything I wrote or said before 2014. I cringe at a lot of my old videos, but I guess they were part of a process of learning.

The videos weren't that bad man, that dude of berean beacon was so creepy.

Offline LivenotoneviL

  • Done
  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,607
  • Intercede for my wretched soul, Saint Alban.
  • Faith: Outside the Church
  • Jurisdiction: Lost for now.
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #34 on: January 16, 2018, 10:16:33 AM »
Our entire cycle of services encourages the imagination. Oops.

Being a convert from the RCC I had certain ideas in mind when referencing 'imagination' in conjunction with the spiritual exercises of Ignatius of Loyola. Much stressed is put upon imagining oneself at the various scenes of our Lord's life as well as forming mental images of both Him and the Theotokos during prayer, two things I always thought were discouraged in Orthodoxy.

Apologies for not being more clear.

That is what I understood - it's a point that my main priest constantly beats in our brains.

I asked him about praying the Rosary at a personal level, because it helped me spiritually, and he said that it's okay under two conditions:

1. That I pray Truth, and not falsehood - no Filioque; if there is an "Immaculate Conception" Rosary to avoid that.

2. Avoid the imagination - that is what we have icons for, and using the imagination can lead to delusion.
« Last Edit: January 16, 2018, 10:17:51 AM by LivenotoneviL »
I'm done.

Offline Iconodule

  • Hoplitarches
  • *************
  • Posts: 15,292
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Patriarchate of Johnstown
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #35 on: January 16, 2018, 10:52:34 AM »
Our service texts are prayers. At matins, vespers, or divine liturgy, if you are paying attention, you will be using your imagination, which means you will be visualizing scenes from the scriptures or church tradition. You will be witnessing Christ's baptism, or his triumphal entry to Jerusalem, or his crucifixion and resurrection. You'll be visualizing the Mother of God holding her protecting veil over Constantinople, or ascending the steps of the Temple. So yes, we use our imagination in prayer, guided by the hymn texts and scripture.

In certain forms of lofty, contemplative prayer, such as the Prayer of the Heart, we are strongly enjoined to keep our mind clear of images and ignore any visions. Here the imagination can be a ground for great danger and temptation, leading to false ecstasies, false realizations, and other kinds of delusion, because we are trying to contemplate God in a silent and direct way; we have to keep our minds clear because we want to receive some blessing which is beyond images and words.  But it does not follow from there that any spiritual practice involving imagination leads to delusion and prelest. I'm not sure when the tendency first started to take the imageless character of Orthodox contemplative prayer and use it as a bludgeon against any visualization of things not readily apparent to the senses, but it seems to me like a cheap polemical trick against the Catholics which in fact undermines Orthodoxy as well.
Mencius said, “Instruction makes use of many techniques. When I do not deign to instruct someone, that too is a form of instruction.”

Offline Sharbel

  • Glory to God in all things!
  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,498
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Greek
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #36 on: January 16, 2018, 12:44:12 PM »
This should be a simple answer: Roman Catholics no matter how their teachings may aline with Orthodoxy are still outside the church.
Quote from: Jn 3:8
The Spirit blows wherever it pleases.
Sanctus Deus
ܩܕܝܫܐ ܐܢ̱ܬ ܠܐ ܡܝܘܬܐ
Άγιος ο Θεός

Offline Sharbel

  • Glory to God in all things!
  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,498
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Greek
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #37 on: January 16, 2018, 12:46:15 PM »
Being a convert from the RCC I had certain ideas in mind when referencing 'imagination' in conjunction with the spiritual exercises of Ignatius of Loyola. Much stressed is put upon imagining oneself at the various scenes of our Lord's life as well as forming mental images of both Him and the Theotokos during prayer, two things I always thought were discouraged in Orthodoxy.
I'm not sure that St. Ignatius recommended such use of imagination during prayer, but when reading the scriptures.
Sanctus Deus
ܩܕܝܫܐ ܐܢ̱ܬ ܠܐ ܡܝܘܬܐ
Άγιος ο Θεός

Offline Sharbel

  • Glory to God in all things!
  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,498
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Greek
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #38 on: January 16, 2018, 12:50:12 PM »
In certain forms of lofty, contemplative prayer, such as the Prayer of the Heart, we are strongly enjoined to keep our mind clear of images and ignore any visions. Here the imagination can be a ground for great danger and temptation, leading to false ecstasies, false realizations, and other kinds of delusion, because we are trying to contemplate God in a silent and direct way; we have to keep our minds clear because we want to receive some blessing which is beyond images and words
Personally, the text I highlighted above is of the essence to me.  Using the imagination limits our ability to receive God's light, who's beyond any human framework, imagined or real.  The only act of the will during prayer can be only one: love God.
Sanctus Deus
ܩܕܝܫܐ ܐܢ̱ܬ ܠܐ ܡܝܘܬܐ
Άγιος ο Θεός

Offline Sharbel

  • Glory to God in all things!
  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,498
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Greek
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #39 on: January 16, 2018, 12:51:41 PM »
Unfortunately, Jackson, the answer is not so simple as that. The history of Orthodox-Catholic relations throughout the Middle Ages show that each communion recognized some degree of ecclesial reality in the other. The Cyprianic interpretation of schism which you provide is not sound, and St. Vincent of Lerins actually uses it in the Commonitorium to show how controversies in the Church are resolved- while venerating St. Cyprian, St. Vincent says the criterion of “everywhere, always, by all” is recognized by all as having vindicated St. Stephen. I firmly believe the Orthodox Church is the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church, but this does not entail that the Roman communion possesses no ecclesiality at all- rather, she participates imperfectly in the Church of Christ. If that sounds like Lumen Gentium, it’s because Lumen Gentium was influenced by Orthodox theologians like Florovsky, Affanassieff (who was present at the Council) and Staniloae (a man of impeccable sanctity and a partner of Fr. Arsenie Boca the Wonderworker). Moreover, the rupture between East and West was gradual. Pope Urban II in 1090 spoke of the Greeks as fellow Christians and members of the Church- 40 years after 1054. The real severance emerged in the 12th-13th centuries, but it was never absolute. Chrysostom Frank has helpfully documented the history of fraternal relations between East and West throughout the Middle Ages and beyond, though I am ultimately more conservative than Frank.

To the original post, I think we can receive nearly all of them. The one I would like to expunge is Josaphat the Malevolent. But it seems to me that his cult is more of a “top-down” imposition and that he has no real organic veneration among Catholics. If we leave it alone, he would probably naturally fall off the calendar, as happened to Michael Cerularius, for example, who was canonized locally but who most certainly did not deserve it. The cult died out naturally because the Holy Spirit was not working to create it. It’s well known that a number of Orthodox saints were influenced by Western spirituality and studied the writings of Catholic saints. The quotation of St. Gennadius on Aquinas above comes from his introduction to his translation of Aquinas’ works. Certainly, St. Gennadius rejected Aquinas in some of his conclusions (Aquinas’ take on absolute simplicity, the Filioque, and the absolute and immediate jurisdiction of the Pope) but the first time you start seeing methodological critiques of Scholasticism from Orthodox is the 20th century, to my knowledge. Scholasticism isn’t problematic in method- it’s the conclusions reached by certain medieval Latin Scholastics which are problematic for Orthodoxy. (Not to say that it’s the ONLY or most important theological method, though)

Another point on St. Thomas- he appeared to an abortionist in Russia and brought about his repentance and conversion- to the Orthodox faith!

The point about imagination in Latin spirituality made above is an interesting one, and I don’t want to dismiss it. But it should be said that imaginative exercises are not absent from Orthodox spirituality. For example, in St. Porphyrios’ “Wounded by Love”, he criticizes those who accused him of prelest for visually imagining the Crucified Christ as he said the Jesus Prayer. At the very least the issue is more complex than it is sometimes presented. St. Ignatius Brianchaninov considered a number of Latin saints to have been immersed in delusion, but there are other Orthodox saints who held them in very high regard. Actually, even St. Mark of Ephesus (the popular portrait of him is just wrong) studied Latin saints and spirituality- he appealed to the writings and theology of St. Bonaventure at the Council of Florence.

At a personal level, I find a hardline position very difficult to believe, given what I have seen and heard. A friend of mine, raised Catholic, actually began his journey to Orthodoxy when he saw the divine light in a monk’s face- a Catholic monk! This inspired him to seek to understand the divine light, and he found Orthodoxy. So the fruit is good. There are countless witnesses to the clairvoyance and sanctity of Padre Pio, who displayed many of the same traits in confession as do our Orthodox saints.

So I think Rome is definitely wrong on a number of important theological points- its understanding of the Petrine office, the procession of the Spirit, and the doctrine of the divine energies. But God is incredibly merciful, and He strives to use what people have to bring them to salvation.
+1

I dare say that there is grace outside the Church.  If there wasn't, there would be no converts to her.  For it is always the Lord who takes the initiative and our part is merely following Him to His Church.
Sanctus Deus
ܩܕܝܫܐ ܐܢ̱ܬ ܠܐ ܡܝܘܬܐ
Άγιος ο Θεός

Offline Pravoslavbob

  • Section Moderator
  • Archon
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,437
  • Out for a stroll...
  • Faith: Orthodox Catholic
  • Jurisdiction: Antioch
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #40 on: January 16, 2018, 01:44:34 PM »
I believe that much of what St. Thomas Aquinas wrote is either not compatible with the Orthodox faith or is problematic in its current form.  As for the quote of St. Gennadius Scholarius cited earlier in this thread, I think that it is important to remember some things about St. Gennadius's life.  He was a layman and a professor of philosophy for many years before becoming the first patriarch of Constantinople after the fall of the city to the Turks.  I think that his enthusiasm for St. Thomas is linked to these factors.  St. Thomas was an avowed Aristotelian in his approach to philosophy and so was St. Gennadius.  St. Gennadius was present at Ferrara-Florence as a staunch proponent of union with Rome, although he changed his mind later and never signed the decree of union.  In fact, along with St. Mark of Ephesus, he became one of the fiercest opponents of union with Rome. 


To the original post, I think we can receive nearly all of them. The one I would like to expunge is Josaphat the Malevolent.

I think there are quite a few more than just St. Josaphat, but never mind.

Quote
St. Gennadius rejected Aquinas in some of his conclusions (Aquinas’ take on absolute simplicity, the Filioque, and the absolute and immediate jurisdiction of the Pope) but the first time you start seeing methodological critiques of Scholasticism from Orthodox is the 20th century, to my knowledge. Scholasticism isn’t problematic in method- it’s the conclusions reached by certain medieval Latin Scholastics which are problematic for Orthodoxy.

I would think that the reason why the first critiques of scholasticism in the Orthodox world were reluctant to attack scholasticism as a method is connected to the likelihood that the authors of these critiques were themselves unwittingly immersed in a scholastic worldview which had held sway in Orthodox intellectual circles for many hundreds of years because of rampant Western influence brought on by the tragic loss of Eastern Christian intellectual traditions with the advent of the Turkocracy and other factors.  And yes, many Orthodox scholastics are still with us today, and there are those who though not scholastics themselves defend the method as being something largely innocuous.  But in my view this does not change the fact that not only the conclusions drawn by scholasticism, but the very method itself is entirely foreign to Orthodoxy.  I think that some (though not all) of the more recent origins of estrangement between East and West are to be found in the Latin embrace of scholasticism.  "We are not even asking the same questions about the faith anymore."

When it comes to St. Thomas as he stands apart from his theology and philosophy, I am inclined to take a positive view.  By all accounts, those who interacted with him found him to be most affable.  He himself, in a sense,  rejected his own writings when he had a mystical vision near the end of his life and could not continue with his work.  I believe he is reputed to have said something to the effect that everything he had written was straw.  Why this does not seem to have been considered by his numerous adherents is beyond me.


Quote
So I think Rome is definitely wrong on a number of important theological points....But God is incredibly merciful, and He strives to use what people have to bring them to salvation.

In this, we are in complete agreement!
« Last Edit: January 16, 2018, 02:05:00 PM by Pravoslavbob »
Atheists have noetic deficiencies.


Don't believe everything you think.


The more I know, the less I know.   ;)

Offline sedevacantist

  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 559
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #41 on: January 21, 2018, 11:53:09 PM »
This should be a simple answer: Roman Catholics no matter how their teachings may aline with Orthodoxy are still outside the church.
lol
Out of the 2 only the Roman Catholic Church teaches as a dogma that there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church

St Thomas stated if you don't believe in the filioque you don't have the faith
CHAPTER 31
That to believe the Holy Spirit is from the Son is necessary for salvation.
For Athanasius says in his letter to Serapion: “In accord with the command of the Apostle (Tit. 3:10): After a first and second correction avoid a heretic, even those you might see flying through the air with Elijah or walking dryshod on the water like Peter and Moses; unless they profess just as we profess that the Holy Spirit is God naturally existing from God the Son, as the son also is naturally God begotten eternally and existing of God and Father, you are not to receive them.” And again: “Have no communion with those who blaspheme and deny that the Holy Spirit is God from the nature of God the Son.”

Likewise Cyril in his Thesaurus says: “It is necessary for our salvation to confess that the Holy Spirit exists of the essence of the Son, as existing of him by nature.” Footnote So, too, Epiphanius in his book on the Trinity: “You cut yourself off from the grace of God when you do not admit the Son to be from the Father or say that the Holy Spirit is not from the Father and the Son.”

 It is, therefore, clear that in no way are they to be tolerated who deny the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Son.

Augustine
"Why, then, should we not believe that the Holy Spirit proceeds also from the Son, when he is the Spirit also of the Son? For
if the Holy Spirit did not proceed from him, when he showed himself to his disciples after his resurrection he would not have
breathed upon them, saying, ‘Receive the Holy Spirit’ [John 20:22]. For what else did he signify by that breathing upon them
except that the Holy Spirit proceeds also from him" (Homilies on John 99:8 [A.D. 416]).

So to be saved you must have the same faith as St.Augustine, St Thomas Aquinas, St Francis Assisi...which you don't because you haven't studied enough or just refuse the truth in your stubbornness..you better rethink your position

Offline LivenotoneviL

  • Done
  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,607
  • Intercede for my wretched soul, Saint Alban.
  • Faith: Outside the Church
  • Jurisdiction: Lost for now.
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #42 on: January 22, 2018, 12:19:10 AM »
So to be saved you must have the same faith as St.Augustine, St Thomas Aquinas, St Francis Assisi...which you don't because you haven't studied enough or just refuse the truth in your stubbornness..you better rethink your position

lol
« Last Edit: January 22, 2018, 12:25:43 AM by LivenotoneviL »
I'm done.

Offline Volnutt

  • Dull Sublunary Lover
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 13,656
  • too often left in the payment of false ponchos
  • Faith: Evangelical by default
  • Jurisdiction: Spiritually homeless
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #43 on: January 22, 2018, 06:14:17 PM »
This should be a simple answer: Roman Catholics no matter how their teachings may aline with Orthodoxy are still outside the church.
lol
Out of the 2 only the Roman Catholic Church teaches as a dogma that there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church

St Thomas stated if you don't believe in the filioque you don't have the faith
CHAPTER 31
That to believe the Holy Spirit is from the Son is necessary for salvation.
For Athanasius says in his letter to Serapion: “In accord with the command of the Apostle (Tit. 3:10): After a first and second correction avoid a heretic, even those you might see flying through the air with Elijah or walking dryshod on the water like Peter and Moses; unless they profess just as we profess that the Holy Spirit is God naturally existing from God the Son, as the son also is naturally God begotten eternally and existing of God and Father, you are not to receive them.” And again: “Have no communion with those who blaspheme and deny that the Holy Spirit is God from the nature of God the Son.”

Likewise Cyril in his Thesaurus says: “It is necessary for our salvation to confess that the Holy Spirit exists of the essence of the Son, as existing of him by nature.” Footnote So, too, Epiphanius in his book on the Trinity: “You cut yourself off from the grace of God when you do not admit the Son to be from the Father or say that the Holy Spirit is not from the Father and the Son.”

You got "chapter and verse" for those so people can look up the original contexts? I have a hard time believing that Cyril, Epiphanius (and especially Athanasius) even knew what the Filioque was, much less believed in it.

So to be saved you must have the same faith as St.Augustine, St Thomas Aquinas, St Francis Assisi...which you don't because you haven't studied enough or just refuse the truth in your stubbornness..you better rethink your position

Like you do in any meaningful sense. Your God places all His emphasis on a visible man and then says "jk guys! You're on your own!" I don't think any Father or RC Doctor would recognize that.
Christ my God, set my heart on fire with love in You, that in its flame I may love You with all my heart, with all my mind, and with all my soul and with all my strength, and my neighbor as myself, so that by keeping Your commandments I may glorify You the Giver of every good and perfect gift. Amen.

Offline LivenotoneviL

  • Done
  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,607
  • Intercede for my wretched soul, Saint Alban.
  • Faith: Outside the Church
  • Jurisdiction: Lost for now.
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #44 on: January 22, 2018, 06:19:59 PM »
This should be a simple answer: Roman Catholics no matter how their teachings may aline with Orthodoxy are still outside the church.
lol
Out of the 2 only the Roman Catholic Church teaches as a dogma that there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church

St Thomas stated if you don't believe in the filioque you don't have the faith
CHAPTER 31
That to believe the Holy Spirit is from the Son is necessary for salvation.
For Athanasius says in his letter to Serapion: “In accord with the command of the Apostle (Tit. 3:10): After a first and second correction avoid a heretic, even those you might see flying through the air with Elijah or walking dryshod on the water like Peter and Moses; unless they profess just as we profess that the Holy Spirit is God naturally existing from God the Son, as the son also is naturally God begotten eternally and existing of God and Father, you are not to receive them.” And again: “Have no communion with those who blaspheme and deny that the Holy Spirit is God from the nature of God the Son.”

Likewise Cyril in his Thesaurus says: “It is necessary for our salvation to confess that the Holy Spirit exists of the essence of the Son, as existing of him by nature.” Footnote So, too, Epiphanius in his book on the Trinity: “You cut yourself off from the grace of God when you do not admit the Son to be from the Father or say that the Holy Spirit is not from the Father and the Son.”

You got "chapter and verse" for those so people can look up the original contexts? I have a hard time believing that Cyril, Epiphanius (and especially Athanasius) even knew what the Filioque was, much less believed in it.

So to be saved you must have the same faith as St.Augustine, St Thomas Aquinas, St Francis Assisi...which you don't because you haven't studied enough or just refuse the truth in your stubbornness..you better rethink your position

Like you do in any meaningful sense. Your God places all His emphasis on a visible man and then says "jk guys! You're on your own!" I don't think any Father or RC Doctor would recognize that.

As I've said before, William Webster stated that Thomas's "Against the Greeks" almost completely used spurious texts / forgeries.

I've yet to see a Catholic apologist attack that claim.

Sedevacantist, can you please read this article?

https://www.christiantruth.com/articles/forgeries.html
« Last Edit: January 22, 2018, 06:20:27 PM by LivenotoneviL »
I'm done.

Offline Volnutt

  • Dull Sublunary Lover
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 13,656
  • too often left in the payment of false ponchos
  • Faith: Evangelical by default
  • Jurisdiction: Spiritually homeless
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #45 on: January 22, 2018, 07:08:07 PM »
Interesting. I didn't know that.

Thanks.
Christ my God, set my heart on fire with love in You, that in its flame I may love You with all my heart, with all my mind, and with all my soul and with all my strength, and my neighbor as myself, so that by keeping Your commandments I may glorify You the Giver of every good and perfect gift. Amen.

Offline IreneOlinyk

  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 639
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #46 on: January 22, 2018, 07:27:08 PM »
And there's the ecclesiopolitically fraught Saints like Josaphat Kuntsevych and a good number of Popes.
He would be #1 on my list.

Offline sedevacantist

  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 559
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #47 on: January 22, 2018, 09:55:29 PM »
This should be a simple answer: Roman Catholics no matter how their teachings may aline with Orthodoxy are still outside the church.
lol
Out of the 2 only the Roman Catholic Church teaches as a dogma that there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church

St Thomas stated if you don't believe in the filioque you don't have the faith
CHAPTER 31
That to believe the Holy Spirit is from the Son is necessary for salvation.
For Athanasius says in his letter to Serapion: “In accord with the command of the Apostle (Tit. 3:10): After a first and second correction avoid a heretic, even those you might see flying through the air with Elijah or walking dryshod on the water like Peter and Moses; unless they profess just as we profess that the Holy Spirit is God naturally existing from God the Son, as the son also is naturally God begotten eternally and existing of God and Father, you are not to receive them.” And again: “Have no communion with those who blaspheme and deny that the Holy Spirit is God from the nature of God the Son.”

Likewise Cyril in his Thesaurus says: “It is necessary for our salvation to confess that the Holy Spirit exists of the essence of the Son, as existing of him by nature.” Footnote So, too, Epiphanius in his book on the Trinity: “You cut yourself off from the grace of God when you do not admit the Son to be from the Father or say that the Holy Spirit is not from the Father and the Son.”

You got "chapter and verse" for those so people can look up the original contexts? I have a hard time believing that Cyril, Epiphanius (and especially Athanasius) even knew what the Filioque was, much less believed in it.

So to be saved you must have the same faith as St.Augustine, St Thomas Aquinas, St Francis Assisi...which you don't because you haven't studied enough or just refuse the truth in your stubbornness..you better rethink your position

Like you do in any meaningful sense. Your God places all His emphasis on a visible man and then says "jk guys! You're on your own!" I don't think any Father or RC Doctor would recognize that.

As I've said before, William Webster stated that Thomas's "Against the Greeks" almost completely used spurious texts / forgeries.

I've yet to see a Catholic apologist attack that claim.

Sedevacantist, can you please read this article?

https://www.christiantruth.com/articles/forgeries.html

   LivenotoneviL ,why would I pay any attention to some William Webster?

Offline sedevacantist

  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 559
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #48 on: January 22, 2018, 09:58:14 PM »
This should be a simple answer: Roman Catholics no matter how their teachings may aline with Orthodoxy are still outside the church.
lol
Out of the 2 only the Roman Catholic Church teaches as a dogma that there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church

St Thomas stated if you don't believe in the filioque you don't have the faith
CHAPTER 31
That to believe the Holy Spirit is from the Son is necessary for salvation.
For Athanasius says in his letter to Serapion: “In accord with the command of the Apostle (Tit. 3:10): After a first and second correction avoid a heretic, even those you might see flying through the air with Elijah or walking dryshod on the water like Peter and Moses; unless they profess just as we profess that the Holy Spirit is God naturally existing from God the Son, as the son also is naturally God begotten eternally and existing of God and Father, you are not to receive them.” And again: “Have no communion with those who blaspheme and deny that the Holy Spirit is God from the nature of God the Son.”

Likewise Cyril in his Thesaurus says: “It is necessary for our salvation to confess that the Holy Spirit exists of the essence of the Son, as existing of him by nature.” Footnote So, too, Epiphanius in his book on the Trinity: “You cut yourself off from the grace of God when you do not admit the Son to be from the Father or say that the Holy Spirit is not from the Father and the Son.”

You got "chapter and verse" for those so people can look up the original contexts? I have a hard time believing that Cyril, Epiphanius (and especially Athanasius) even knew what the Filioque was, much less believed in it.

So to be saved you must have the same faith as St.Augustine, St Thomas Aquinas, St Francis Assisi...which you don't because you haven't studied enough or just refuse the truth in your stubbornness..you better rethink your position

Like you do in any meaningful sense. Your God places all His emphasis on a visible man and then says "jk guys! You're on your own!" I don't think any Father or RC Doctor would recognize that.
how do I not have the same faith as St Augustine, St Thomas etc..it's actual Catholic teaching that a heretic ,St. Francis De Sales (17
th
 century), Doctor of the Church,
The Catholic Controversy
, pp.
305-306:  "
Now when he [the Pope] is explicitly a heretic, he falls
ipso facto
 from his
dignity and out of the Church
..."

Offline Volnutt

  • Dull Sublunary Lover
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 13,656
  • too often left in the payment of false ponchos
  • Faith: Evangelical by default
  • Jurisdiction: Spiritually homeless
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #49 on: January 22, 2018, 10:04:16 PM »
This should be a simple answer: Roman Catholics no matter how their teachings may aline with Orthodoxy are still outside the church.
lol
Out of the 2 only the Roman Catholic Church teaches as a dogma that there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church

St Thomas stated if you don't believe in the filioque you don't have the faith
CHAPTER 31
That to believe the Holy Spirit is from the Son is necessary for salvation.
For Athanasius says in his letter to Serapion: “In accord with the command of the Apostle (Tit. 3:10): After a first and second correction avoid a heretic, even those you might see flying through the air with Elijah or walking dryshod on the water like Peter and Moses; unless they profess just as we profess that the Holy Spirit is God naturally existing from God the Son, as the son also is naturally God begotten eternally and existing of God and Father, you are not to receive them.” And again: “Have no communion with those who blaspheme and deny that the Holy Spirit is God from the nature of God the Son.”

Likewise Cyril in his Thesaurus says: “It is necessary for our salvation to confess that the Holy Spirit exists of the essence of the Son, as existing of him by nature.” Footnote So, too, Epiphanius in his book on the Trinity: “You cut yourself off from the grace of God when you do not admit the Son to be from the Father or say that the Holy Spirit is not from the Father and the Son.”

You got "chapter and verse" for those so people can look up the original contexts? I have a hard time believing that Cyril, Epiphanius (and especially Athanasius) even knew what the Filioque was, much less believed in it.

So to be saved you must have the same faith as St.Augustine, St Thomas Aquinas, St Francis Assisi...which you don't because you haven't studied enough or just refuse the truth in your stubbornness..you better rethink your position

Like you do in any meaningful sense. Your God places all His emphasis on a visible man and then says "jk guys! You're on your own!" I don't think any Father or RC Doctor would recognize that.
how do I not have the same faith as St Augustine, St Thomas etc..it's actual Catholic teaching that a heretic ,St. Francis De Sales (17
th
 century), Doctor of the Church,
The Catholic Controversy
, pp.
305-306:  "
Now when he [the Pope] is explicitly a heretic, he falls
ipso facto
 from his
dignity and out of the Church
..."

A heretic falling from the Papacy? Sure. A line of heretics ruling for 60 years with no end in sight? Not so much. That's just abusing any sort of common sense. Maybe if the world ended some time in the 80s...
« Last Edit: January 22, 2018, 10:04:54 PM by Volnutt »
Christ my God, set my heart on fire with love in You, that in its flame I may love You with all my heart, with all my mind, and with all my soul and with all my strength, and my neighbor as myself, so that by keeping Your commandments I may glorify You the Giver of every good and perfect gift. Amen.

Offline Volnutt

  • Dull Sublunary Lover
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 13,656
  • too often left in the payment of false ponchos
  • Faith: Evangelical by default
  • Jurisdiction: Spiritually homeless
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #50 on: January 22, 2018, 10:06:45 PM »
This should be a simple answer: Roman Catholics no matter how their teachings may aline with Orthodoxy are still outside the church.
lol
Out of the 2 only the Roman Catholic Church teaches as a dogma that there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church

St Thomas stated if you don't believe in the filioque you don't have the faith
CHAPTER 31
That to believe the Holy Spirit is from the Son is necessary for salvation.
For Athanasius says in his letter to Serapion: “In accord with the command of the Apostle (Tit. 3:10): After a first and second correction avoid a heretic, even those you might see flying through the air with Elijah or walking dryshod on the water like Peter and Moses; unless they profess just as we profess that the Holy Spirit is God naturally existing from God the Son, as the son also is naturally God begotten eternally and existing of God and Father, you are not to receive them.” And again: “Have no communion with those who blaspheme and deny that the Holy Spirit is God from the nature of God the Son.”

Likewise Cyril in his Thesaurus says: “It is necessary for our salvation to confess that the Holy Spirit exists of the essence of the Son, as existing of him by nature.” Footnote So, too, Epiphanius in his book on the Trinity: “You cut yourself off from the grace of God when you do not admit the Son to be from the Father or say that the Holy Spirit is not from the Father and the Son.”

You got "chapter and verse" for those so people can look up the original contexts? I have a hard time believing that Cyril, Epiphanius (and especially Athanasius) even knew what the Filioque was, much less believed in it.

So to be saved you must have the same faith as St.Augustine, St Thomas Aquinas, St Francis Assisi...which you don't because you haven't studied enough or just refuse the truth in your stubbornness..you better rethink your position

Like you do in any meaningful sense. Your God places all His emphasis on a visible man and then says "jk guys! You're on your own!" I don't think any Father or RC Doctor would recognize that.

As I've said before, William Webster stated that Thomas's "Against the Greeks" almost completely used spurious texts / forgeries.

I've yet to see a Catholic apologist attack that claim.

Sedevacantist, can you please read this article?

https://www.christiantruth.com/articles/forgeries.html

   LivenotoneviL ,why would I pay any attention to some William Webster?

Why are you even here trying to convert us poor benighted lambs if you have no intention to respond to our arguments? Argue in bad faith much?
Christ my God, set my heart on fire with love in You, that in its flame I may love You with all my heart, with all my mind, and with all my soul and with all my strength, and my neighbor as myself, so that by keeping Your commandments I may glorify You the Giver of every good and perfect gift. Amen.

Offline sedevacantist

  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 559
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #51 on: January 22, 2018, 10:49:39 PM »
This should be a simple answer: Roman Catholics no matter how their teachings may aline with Orthodoxy are still outside the church.
lol
Out of the 2 only the Roman Catholic Church teaches as a dogma that there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church

St Thomas stated if you don't believe in the filioque you don't have the faith
CHAPTER 31
That to believe the Holy Spirit is from the Son is necessary for salvation.
For Athanasius says in his letter to Serapion: “In accord with the command of the Apostle (Tit. 3:10): After a first and second correction avoid a heretic, even those you might see flying through the air with Elijah or walking dryshod on the water like Peter and Moses; unless they profess just as we profess that the Holy Spirit is God naturally existing from God the Son, as the son also is naturally God begotten eternally and existing of God and Father, you are not to receive them.” And again: “Have no communion with those who blaspheme and deny that the Holy Spirit is God from the nature of God the Son.”

Likewise Cyril in his Thesaurus says: “It is necessary for our salvation to confess that the Holy Spirit exists of the essence of the Son, as existing of him by nature.” Footnote So, too, Epiphanius in his book on the Trinity: “You cut yourself off from the grace of God when you do not admit the Son to be from the Father or say that the Holy Spirit is not from the Father and the Son.”

You got "chapter and verse" for those so people can look up the original contexts? I have a hard time believing that Cyril, Epiphanius (and especially Athanasius) even knew what the Filioque was, much less believed in it.

So to be saved you must have the same faith as St.Augustine, St Thomas Aquinas, St Francis Assisi...which you don't because you haven't studied enough or just refuse the truth in your stubbornness..you better rethink your position

Like you do in any meaningful sense. Your God places all His emphasis on a visible man and then says "jk guys! You're on your own!" I don't think any Father or RC Doctor would recognize that.

As I've said before, William Webster stated that Thomas's "Against the Greeks" almost completely used spurious texts / forgeries.

I've yet to see a Catholic apologist attack that claim.

Sedevacantist, can you please read this article?

https://www.christiantruth.com/articles/forgeries.html

   LivenotoneviL ,why would I pay any attention to some William Webster?

Why are you even here trying to convert us poor benighted lambs if you have no intention to respond to our arguments? Argue in bad faith much?
I respond and have  refuted all sensible arguments, some webster guy says Saint Thomas (doctor of the Church, a saint ) used forgeries is not a sensible argument , it's rubbish

Offline sedevacantist

  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 559
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #52 on: January 22, 2018, 10:52:16 PM »
This should be a simple answer: Roman Catholics no matter how their teachings may aline with Orthodoxy are still outside the church.
lol
Out of the 2 only the Roman Catholic Church teaches as a dogma that there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church

St Thomas stated if you don't believe in the filioque you don't have the faith
CHAPTER 31
That to believe the Holy Spirit is from the Son is necessary for salvation.
For Athanasius says in his letter to Serapion: “In accord with the command of the Apostle (Tit. 3:10): After a first and second correction avoid a heretic, even those you might see flying through the air with Elijah or walking dryshod on the water like Peter and Moses; unless they profess just as we profess that the Holy Spirit is God naturally existing from God the Son, as the son also is naturally God begotten eternally and existing of God and Father, you are not to receive them.” And again: “Have no communion with those who blaspheme and deny that the Holy Spirit is God from the nature of God the Son.”

Likewise Cyril in his Thesaurus says: “It is necessary for our salvation to confess that the Holy Spirit exists of the essence of the Son, as existing of him by nature.” Footnote So, too, Epiphanius in his book on the Trinity: “You cut yourself off from the grace of God when you do not admit the Son to be from the Father or say that the Holy Spirit is not from the Father and the Son.”

You got "chapter and verse" for those so people can look up the original contexts? I have a hard time believing that Cyril, Epiphanius (and especially Athanasius) even knew what the Filioque was, much less believed in it.

So to be saved you must have the same faith as St.Augustine, St Thomas Aquinas, St Francis Assisi...which you don't because you haven't studied enough or just refuse the truth in your stubbornness..you better rethink your position

Like you do in any meaningful sense. Your God places all His emphasis on a visible man and then says "jk guys! You're on your own!" I don't think any Father or RC Doctor would recognize that.
how do I not have the same faith as St Augustine, St Thomas etc..it's actual Catholic teaching that a heretic ,St. Francis De Sales (17
th
 century), Doctor of the Church,
The Catholic Controversy
, pp.
305-306:  "
Now when he [the Pope] is explicitly a heretic, he falls
ipso facto
 from his
dignity and out of the Church
..."

A heretic falling from the Papacy? Sure. A line of heretics ruling for 60 years with no end in sight? Not so much. That's just abusing any sort of common sense. Maybe if the world ended some time in the 80s...
what are you basing your opinion on, what are you saying? are you saying the past 60 years the popes have had the Catholic faith?

Offline Mor Ephrem

  • A highly skilled and trained Freudian feminist slut
  • Section Moderator
  • Hypatos
  • *****
  • Posts: 34,711
    • OrthodoxChristianity.net
  • Faith: Mercenary Freudianism
  • Jurisdiction: Texas Feminist Coptic
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #53 on: January 22, 2018, 11:07:20 PM »
The Roman Popes haven’t had the Catholic faith for one thousand five hundred and sixty-seven years.

Offline sedevacantist

  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 559
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #54 on: January 22, 2018, 11:13:41 PM »
The Roman Popes haven’t had the Catholic faith for one thousand five hundred and sixty-seven years.
you are clueless and don't know what you are talking about, do some more studying

Offline Mor Ephrem

  • A highly skilled and trained Freudian feminist slut
  • Section Moderator
  • Hypatos
  • *****
  • Posts: 34,711
    • OrthodoxChristianity.net
  • Faith: Mercenary Freudianism
  • Jurisdiction: Texas Feminist Coptic
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #55 on: January 22, 2018, 11:16:18 PM »
The Roman Popes haven’t had the Catholic faith for one thousand five hundred and sixty-seven years.
you are clueless and don't know what you are talking about, do some more studying

Hocus pocus spiritu tuo!

Offline Volnutt

  • Dull Sublunary Lover
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 13,656
  • too often left in the payment of false ponchos
  • Faith: Evangelical by default
  • Jurisdiction: Spiritually homeless
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #56 on: January 22, 2018, 11:33:03 PM »
This should be a simple answer: Roman Catholics no matter how their teachings may aline with Orthodoxy are still outside the church.
lol
Out of the 2 only the Roman Catholic Church teaches as a dogma that there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church

St Thomas stated if you don't believe in the filioque you don't have the faith
CHAPTER 31
That to believe the Holy Spirit is from the Son is necessary for salvation.
For Athanasius says in his letter to Serapion: “In accord with the command of the Apostle (Tit. 3:10): After a first and second correction avoid a heretic, even those you might see flying through the air with Elijah or walking dryshod on the water like Peter and Moses; unless they profess just as we profess that the Holy Spirit is God naturally existing from God the Son, as the son also is naturally God begotten eternally and existing of God and Father, you are not to receive them.” And again: “Have no communion with those who blaspheme and deny that the Holy Spirit is God from the nature of God the Son.”

Likewise Cyril in his Thesaurus says: “It is necessary for our salvation to confess that the Holy Spirit exists of the essence of the Son, as existing of him by nature.” Footnote So, too, Epiphanius in his book on the Trinity: “You cut yourself off from the grace of God when you do not admit the Son to be from the Father or say that the Holy Spirit is not from the Father and the Son.”

You got "chapter and verse" for those so people can look up the original contexts? I have a hard time believing that Cyril, Epiphanius (and especially Athanasius) even knew what the Filioque was, much less believed in it.

So to be saved you must have the same faith as St.Augustine, St Thomas Aquinas, St Francis Assisi...which you don't because you haven't studied enough or just refuse the truth in your stubbornness..you better rethink your position

Like you do in any meaningful sense. Your God places all His emphasis on a visible man and then says "jk guys! You're on your own!" I don't think any Father or RC Doctor would recognize that.

As I've said before, William Webster stated that Thomas's "Against the Greeks" almost completely used spurious texts / forgeries.

I've yet to see a Catholic apologist attack that claim.

Sedevacantist, can you please read this article?

https://www.christiantruth.com/articles/forgeries.html

   LivenotoneviL ,why would I pay any attention to some William Webster?

Why are you even here trying to convert us poor benighted lambs if you have no intention to respond to our arguments? Argue in bad faith much?
I respond and have  refuted all sensible arguments, some webster guy says Saint Thomas (doctor of the Church, a saint ) used forgeries is not a sensible argument , it's rubbish

Why? I don't think he's saying that Thomas lied, just that he was fooled by fake documents. How many Saints of the past believed that the Donation of Constantine was authentic?

what are you basing your opinion on, what are you saying?

I'm basing my opinion on simple common sense. Any God who would make a single office the focus of all earthly unity and salvation, as the RCC claims, and then yank the rug out on said office for 60 years is either a gamester or a charlatan.

are you saying the past 60 years the popes have had the Catholic faith?

I think they've been more Catholic than you. But really the RCC is pretty low on my list of candidates for conversion to. I'm far more likely to become Orthodox, so I don't care that much about the Papacy.
Christ my God, set my heart on fire with love in You, that in its flame I may love You with all my heart, with all my mind, and with all my soul and with all my strength, and my neighbor as myself, so that by keeping Your commandments I may glorify You the Giver of every good and perfect gift. Amen.

Offline sedevacantist

  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 559
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #57 on: January 22, 2018, 11:45:33 PM »
This should be a simple answer: Roman Catholics no matter how their teachings may aline with Orthodoxy are still outside the church.
lol
Out of the 2 only the Roman Catholic Church teaches as a dogma that there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church

St Thomas stated if you don't believe in the filioque you don't have the faith
CHAPTER 31
That to believe the Holy Spirit is from the Son is necessary for salvation.
For Athanasius says in his letter to Serapion: “In accord with the command of the Apostle (Tit. 3:10): After a first and second correction avoid a heretic, even those you might see flying through the air with Elijah or walking dryshod on the water like Peter and Moses; unless they profess just as we profess that the Holy Spirit is God naturally existing from God the Son, as the son also is naturally God begotten eternally and existing of God and Father, you are not to receive them.” And again: “Have no communion with those who blaspheme and deny that the Holy Spirit is God from the nature of God the Son.”

Likewise Cyril in his Thesaurus says: “It is necessary for our salvation to confess that the Holy Spirit exists of the essence of the Son, as existing of him by nature.” Footnote So, too, Epiphanius in his book on the Trinity: “You cut yourself off from the grace of God when you do not admit the Son to be from the Father or say that the Holy Spirit is not from the Father and the Son.”

You got "chapter and verse" for those so people can look up the original contexts? I have a hard time believing that Cyril, Epiphanius (and especially Athanasius) even knew what the Filioque was, much less believed in it.

So to be saved you must have the same faith as St.Augustine, St Thomas Aquinas, St Francis Assisi...which you don't because you haven't studied enough or just refuse the truth in your stubbornness..you better rethink your position

Like you do in any meaningful sense. Your God places all His emphasis on a visible man and then says "jk guys! You're on your own!" I don't think any Father or RC Doctor would recognize that.

As I've said before, William Webster stated that Thomas's "Against the Greeks" almost completely used spurious texts / forgeries.

I've yet to see a Catholic apologist attack that claim.

Sedevacantist, can you please read this article?

https://www.christiantruth.com/articles/forgeries.html

   LivenotoneviL ,why would I pay any attention to some William Webster?

Why are you even here trying to convert us poor benighted lambs if you have no intention to respond to our arguments? Argue in bad faith much?
I respond and have  refuted all sensible arguments, some webster guy says Saint Thomas (doctor of the Church, a saint ) used forgeries is not a sensible argument , it's rubbish

Why? I don't think he's saying that Thomas lied, just that he was fooled by fake documents. How many Saints of the past believed that the Donation of Constantine was authentic?

what are you basing your opinion on, what are you saying?

I'm basing my opinion on simple common sense. Any God who would make a single office the focus of all earthly unity and salvation, as the RCC claims, and then yank the rug out on said office for 60 years is either a gamester or a charlatan.

are you saying the past 60 years the popes have had the Catholic faith?

I think they've been more Catholic than you. But really the RCC is pretty low on my list of candidates for conversion to. I'm far more likely to become Orthodox, so I don't care that much about the Papacy.
That's the difference between people like me and you, you think they're more Catholic than me, I know they're not, because I know what I'm talking about...you don't, you have  a lot to learn, especially the papacy which is biblical, the question is why don't you care about the truth?

John chapter 21 provides more proof that Jesus entrusted all the members of His
Church to St. Peter.
John 21:15-17 “So when they had dined, Jesus saith to Simon Peter, Simon,
son of Jonas, lovest thou me more than these? He saith unto him, Yea, Lord;
thou knowest that I love thee. He saith unto him, Feed my lambs. He saith to
him again the second time, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me? He saith unto
him, Yea, Lord; thou knowest that I love thee. He saith unto him, Tend my
sheep. He saith unto him the third time, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me?
Peter was grieved because he said unto him the third time, Lovest thou me?
And he said unto him, Lord, thou knowest all things; thou knowest that I love
thee. Jesus saith unto him, Feed my sheep.
We see here, in John 21, that Jesus entrusts all of His sheep to St. Peter. The
dogmatic First Vatican Council of the Catholic Church said that this moment in John
21, after the Resurrection of Jesus, was the moment that Jesus actually gave to St.Peter the keys and the authority over His church which He had promised him in
Matthew 16.

Offline Volnutt

  • Dull Sublunary Lover
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 13,656
  • too often left in the payment of false ponchos
  • Faith: Evangelical by default
  • Jurisdiction: Spiritually homeless
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #58 on: January 22, 2018, 11:59:48 PM »
This should be a simple answer: Roman Catholics no matter how their teachings may aline with Orthodoxy are still outside the church.
lol
Out of the 2 only the Roman Catholic Church teaches as a dogma that there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church

St Thomas stated if you don't believe in the filioque you don't have the faith
CHAPTER 31
That to believe the Holy Spirit is from the Son is necessary for salvation.
For Athanasius says in his letter to Serapion: “In accord with the command of the Apostle (Tit. 3:10): After a first and second correction avoid a heretic, even those you might see flying through the air with Elijah or walking dryshod on the water like Peter and Moses; unless they profess just as we profess that the Holy Spirit is God naturally existing from God the Son, as the son also is naturally God begotten eternally and existing of God and Father, you are not to receive them.” And again: “Have no communion with those who blaspheme and deny that the Holy Spirit is God from the nature of God the Son.”

Likewise Cyril in his Thesaurus says: “It is necessary for our salvation to confess that the Holy Spirit exists of the essence of the Son, as existing of him by nature.” Footnote So, too, Epiphanius in his book on the Trinity: “You cut yourself off from the grace of God when you do not admit the Son to be from the Father or say that the Holy Spirit is not from the Father and the Son.”

You got "chapter and verse" for those so people can look up the original contexts? I have a hard time believing that Cyril, Epiphanius (and especially Athanasius) even knew what the Filioque was, much less believed in it.

So to be saved you must have the same faith as St.Augustine, St Thomas Aquinas, St Francis Assisi...which you don't because you haven't studied enough or just refuse the truth in your stubbornness..you better rethink your position

Like you do in any meaningful sense. Your God places all His emphasis on a visible man and then says "jk guys! You're on your own!" I don't think any Father or RC Doctor would recognize that.

As I've said before, William Webster stated that Thomas's "Against the Greeks" almost completely used spurious texts / forgeries.

I've yet to see a Catholic apologist attack that claim.

Sedevacantist, can you please read this article?

https://www.christiantruth.com/articles/forgeries.html

   LivenotoneviL ,why would I pay any attention to some William Webster?

Why are you even here trying to convert us poor benighted lambs if you have no intention to respond to our arguments? Argue in bad faith much?
I respond and have  refuted all sensible arguments, some webster guy says Saint Thomas (doctor of the Church, a saint ) used forgeries is not a sensible argument , it's rubbish

Why? I don't think he's saying that Thomas lied, just that he was fooled by fake documents. How many Saints of the past believed that the Donation of Constantine was authentic?

what are you basing your opinion on, what are you saying?

I'm basing my opinion on simple common sense. Any God who would make a single office the focus of all earthly unity and salvation, as the RCC claims, and then yank the rug out on said office for 60 years is either a gamester or a charlatan.

are you saying the past 60 years the popes have had the Catholic faith?

I think they've been more Catholic than you. But really the RCC is pretty low on my list of candidates for conversion to. I'm far more likely to become Orthodox, so I don't care that much about the Papacy.
That's the difference between people like me and you, you think they're more Catholic than me, I know they're not, because I know what I'm talking about...you don't, you have  a lot to learn, especially the papacy which is biblical, the question is why don't you care about the truth?

Maybe the difference between people like me and you is enough intellectual humility to recognize that "disagreeing with me" does not automatically equal "negligence." I care about the truth, I just don't think that the RCC is it and even if I did I wouldn't think that sedevacantism is the RCC.

John chapter 21 provides more proof that Jesus entrusted all the members of His
Church to St. Peter.
John 21:15-17 “So when they had dined, Jesus saith to Simon Peter, Simon,
son of Jonas, lovest thou me more than these? He saith unto him, Yea, Lord;
thou knowest that I love thee. He saith unto him, Feed my lambs. He saith to
him again the second time, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me? He saith unto
him, Yea, Lord; thou knowest that I love thee. He saith unto him, Tend my
sheep. He saith unto him the third time, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me?
Peter was grieved because he said unto him the third time, Lovest thou me?
And he said unto him, Lord, thou knowest all things; thou knowest that I love
thee. Jesus saith unto him, Feed my sheep.
We see here, in John 21, that Jesus entrusts all of His sheep to St. Peter. The
dogmatic First Vatican Council of the Catholic Church said that this moment in John
21, after the Resurrection of Jesus, was the moment that Jesus actually gave to St.Peter the keys and the authority over His church which He had promised him in
Matthew 16.

Oh joy. Catholic Apologetics 101.

Now prove that St. Peter being entrusted with the flock=Papal Supremacy, Universal Jurisdiction, and Rome as the sole Petrine See and that you aren't just reading those ideas into Scripture and the Early Fathers instead of the other way around. Not like there aren't roughly 10,000 threads on that topic on this site alone...
Christ my God, set my heart on fire with love in You, that in its flame I may love You with all my heart, with all my mind, and with all my soul and with all my strength, and my neighbor as myself, so that by keeping Your commandments I may glorify You the Giver of every good and perfect gift. Amen.

Offline sedevacantist

  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 559
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #59 on: January 23, 2018, 10:54:54 PM »
This should be a simple answer: Roman Catholics no matter how their teachings may aline with Orthodoxy are still outside the church.
lol
Out of the 2 only the Roman Catholic Church teaches as a dogma that there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church

St Thomas stated if you don't believe in the filioque you don't have the faith
CHAPTER 31
That to believe the Holy Spirit is from the Son is necessary for salvation.
For Athanasius says in his letter to Serapion: “In accord with the command of the Apostle (Tit. 3:10): After a first and second correction avoid a heretic, even those you might see flying through the air with Elijah or walking dryshod on the water like Peter and Moses; unless they profess just as we profess that the Holy Spirit is God naturally existing from God the Son, as the son also is naturally God begotten eternally and existing of God and Father, you are not to receive them.” And again: “Have no communion with those who blaspheme and deny that the Holy Spirit is God from the nature of God the Son.”

Likewise Cyril in his Thesaurus says: “It is necessary for our salvation to confess that the Holy Spirit exists of the essence of the Son, as existing of him by nature.” Footnote So, too, Epiphanius in his book on the Trinity: “You cut yourself off from the grace of God when you do not admit the Son to be from the Father or say that the Holy Spirit is not from the Father and the Son.”

You got "chapter and verse" for those so people can look up the original contexts? I have a hard time believing that Cyril, Epiphanius (and especially Athanasius) even knew what the Filioque was, much less believed in it.

So to be saved you must have the same faith as St.Augustine, St Thomas Aquinas, St Francis Assisi...which you don't because you haven't studied enough or just refuse the truth in your stubbornness..you better rethink your position

Like you do in any meaningful sense. Your God places all His emphasis on a visible man and then says "jk guys! You're on your own!" I don't think any Father or RC Doctor would recognize that.

As I've said before, William Webster stated that Thomas's "Against the Greeks" almost completely used spurious texts / forgeries.

I've yet to see a Catholic apologist attack that claim.

Sedevacantist, can you please read this article?

https://www.christiantruth.com/articles/forgeries.html

   LivenotoneviL ,why would I pay any attention to some William Webster?

Why are you even here trying to convert us poor benighted lambs if you have no intention to respond to our arguments? Argue in bad faith much?
I respond and have  refuted all sensible arguments, some webster guy says Saint Thomas (doctor of the Church, a saint ) used forgeries is not a sensible argument , it's rubbish

Why? I don't think he's saying that Thomas lied, just that he was fooled by fake documents. How many Saints of the past believed that the Donation of Constantine was authentic?

what are you basing your opinion on, what are you saying?

I'm basing my opinion on simple common sense. Any God who would make a single office the focus of all earthly unity and salvation, as the RCC claims, and then yank the rug out on said office for 60 years is either a gamester or a charlatan.

are you saying the past 60 years the popes have had the Catholic faith?

I think they've been more Catholic than you. But really the RCC is pretty low on my list of candidates for conversion to. I'm far more likely to become Orthodox, so I don't care that much about the Papacy.
That's the difference between people like me and you, you think they're more Catholic than me, I know they're not, because I know what I'm talking about...you don't, you have  a lot to learn, especially the papacy which is biblical, the question is why don't you care about the truth?

Maybe the difference between people like me and you is enough intellectual humility to recognize that "disagreeing with me" does not automatically equal "negligence." I care about the truth, I just don't think that the RCC is it and even if I did I wouldn't think that sedevacantism is the RCC.

John chapter 21 provides more proof that Jesus entrusted all the members of His
Church to St. Peter.
John 21:15-17 “So when they had dined, Jesus saith to Simon Peter, Simon,
son of Jonas, lovest thou me more than these? He saith unto him, Yea, Lord;
thou knowest that I love thee. He saith unto him, Feed my lambs. He saith to
him again the second time, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me? He saith unto
him, Yea, Lord; thou knowest that I love thee. He saith unto him, Tend my
sheep. He saith unto him the third time, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me?
Peter was grieved because he said unto him the third time, Lovest thou me?
And he said unto him, Lord, thou knowest all things; thou knowest that I love
thee. Jesus saith unto him, Feed my sheep.
We see here, in John 21, that Jesus entrusts all of His sheep to St. Peter. The
dogmatic First Vatican Council of the Catholic Church said that this moment in John
21, after the Resurrection of Jesus, was the moment that Jesus actually gave to St.Peter the keys and the authority over His church which He had promised him in
Matthew 16.

Oh joy. Catholic Apologetics 101.

Now prove that St. Peter being entrusted with the flock=Papal Supremacy, Universal Jurisdiction, and Rome as the sole Petrine See and that you aren't just reading those ideas into Scripture and the Early Fathers instead of the other way around. Not like there aren't roughly 10,000 threads on that topic on this site alone...
like you said" so I don't care that much about the Papacy."
you don't care about the truth, you believe some article that claims Saint Thomas and popes were duped into believing forgeries,

how about this quote..forgery right?

There is the case of the sedition at the Church of Corinth in the first century (A.D. 90-100).  The Church at Corinth asked for help from the Bishop of Rome, Pope St. Clement.  They requested him to intercede, even though the apostle John was still alive and closer in Ephesus.  This shows the Papal Primacy from the beginning.  In response Pope Clement wrote his famous epistle to the Corinthians.  In this epistle from the first century, the pope clearly uses authoritative language to command them to be subject to their local pastors.  Here are some quotes from his famous epistle:
Owing, dear brethren, to the sudden and successive calamitous events which have befallen us (i.e., the persecutions of Emperor Domitian), we feel that we have been somewhat tardy in turning our attention to the points respecting which you consulted us; and especially to that shameful and detestable sedition, utterly abhorrent to the elect of God, which a few rash and self-confident persons have kindled to such a pitch of frenzy, that your venerable and illustrious name, worthy to be universally loved, has suffered grievous injury.” (First Clement, Chapter 1)

“Ye, therefore, who laid the foundation of this sedition, submit yourselves to the presbyters, and receive correction so as to repent, bending the knees of your hearts. Learn to be subject, laying aside the proud and arrogant self-confidence of your tongue.” (First Clement, Chapter 57)

“Your schism has subverted [the faith of] many, has discouraged many, has given rise to doubt in many, and has caused grief to us all. And still your sedition continueth.” (First Clement, Chapter 46)

Offline RaphaCam

  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 7,056
  • It is honourable to reveal the works of God
    • Em Espírito e em Verdade
  • Faith: Big-O Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Exarchate of Gotham City
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #60 on: January 24, 2018, 12:27:17 AM »
I respond and have  refuted all sensible arguments, some webster guy says Saint Thomas (doctor of the Church, a saint ) used forgeries is not a sensible argument , it's rubbish
Nobody said he knew about it, do you think he was he infallible or something? If even he was so careful about his own sources as to look for multiple manuscripts of the very same texts, why would you take for granted a shady Thesaurus just because it could be found trustable enough back then?
« Last Edit: January 24, 2018, 12:32:04 AM by RaphaCam »
"May the Lord our God remember in His kingdom all Holy Catholic Apostolic Church, which heralds the Word of Truth and fearlessly offers and distributes the Holy Oblation despite human deficiencies and persecutions moved by the powers of this world, in all time and unto the ages of ages."

May the Blessed Light shine Forth

Offline Xavier

  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 636
  • Immaculate Heart of Mary, Pray for US!
  • Faith: Catholic Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Apostolic Throne of St. Peter's
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #61 on: January 24, 2018, 06:07:36 AM »
Quote
When it comes to St. Thomas as he stands apart from his theology and philosophy, I am inclined to take a positive view.  By all accounts, those who interacted with him found him to be most affable.  He himself, in a sense,  rejected his own writings when he had a mystical vision near the end of his life

I just want to mention there's more to it than this - first, to the stupefied amazement of his contemporaries, the writings of the Angelic Doctor were personally approved by Jesus Christ, as being the closest man can come while still on Earth to contemplating and admiring the divine mysteries. See below. The vision St. Thomas had near the end of his life was one of great heavenly beauty, and shows that man cannot fathom a fraction of a fraction of the heavenly bliss that awaits the just, while still in this life here below, as even St. Paul the Apostle says. Not only was St. Thomas admired for a long time in the East, but you look at say the Confession of Dositheus in the Synod of Jerusalem and the theological precision with which it describes doctrines including transubstantiation - and there's no other word for it, it was demonstrably Thomistic. A reading of that Council shows the Eastern Church appreciated Thomistic theology and used it in its own doctrinal judgments even at that late juncture. https://www3.nd.edu/~maritain/jmc/etext/sta21.htm

Quote
THE Doctors of the University of Paris consulted him one day about a difficult question regarding the Eucharist.
He wrote his reply and placed it on the altar, submitting it to the judgment of God.
His companion and several other brothers were there and watched him.
Suddenly they saw Christ standing above the copy-book, and they heard these words:
"Thou hast written well of the Sacrament of My Body, and thou hast well and truthfully answered the question that was put to thee, so far as it is possible to know these things on earth."
And stupefied, they saw the Saint joyfully lift himself up in the air about an arm's length. So strong was the attraction of his soul toward God, and so strong the love of God that drew him up.
Another time, at the convent of Naples, the sacristan saw him lifted up quite a distance from the floor of the chapel.
He stayed a long time to look. Saint Thomas, turned towards the Crucifix, prayed and wept. And suddenly a voice came from the Crucifix:
"Thou hast written well of Me, Thomas," said the voice. "What reward wilt thou have?"
"None other than Thyself, Lord!" replied the Saint.
He was then writing about the Passion and Resurrection of Christ.
*
For the feast of Christmas, Saint Thomas always received some fine present from the Child Jesus.
One time it was the conversion of two Jews from Rome who met at the house of a Cardinal.
Brother Thomas," said the Cardinal, "say some of your good and holy words to these two hardened Jews."
Brother Thomas talked to them. "And as soon as he began they felt themselves changed." They themselves admitted that "it was with difficulty that they could resist his reasoning or contradict him."
They asked for Baptism, and were baptized on Christmas Day in the chapel of the Cardinal.
*
The sick were cured by his prayer, or by touching the hem of his cloak. One day he cured Reginald, his beloved companion, who had been suffering for some time from a dangerous fever. Thomas, who always carried about him some relics of the little martyr Agnes, placed them on the breast of the sick man. And Reginald, who had confidence and prayed, was immediately cured.
But now the holy Doctor was sick himself. A brother who was caring for him, and a child named John Coppa, suddenly saw a large bright star come into the window and shine over the bed where he was lying. It stayed in the room long enough for one to say a Hail Mary.
This prodigy, to which John Coppa testified at the process of canonization, took place at Naples in 1274, the very year of the Saint's death.
*
A little before, on December 6th, 1273, he had a long ecstasy. That is to say, God drew all his attention and all the affection of his soul. And He kept him for a long time, as a mother holds her child in her arms and presses it against her breast.
Reginald, who did not like to see his Master so forgetful, and who was, perhaps, also a little afraid to have him die, indiscreetly pulled him by the cloak. The Saint came back to himself, but from that day he ceased to write or to dictate.
Reginald was very sad, and said to him:
"How can you set aside such an important work which you undertook for the love of God and the enlightenment of the world?"
"I can do no more," replied his Master, "I can do no more, Reginald. Such secrets have been revealed to me that all I have written now seems to be as nothing. Now I hope that in His goodness God will allow the end of my life to follow closely that of my work."
Saint Thomas spoke this way without bitterness. He had only gentleness in him. Especially from December 6th, he seemed filled with the gentleness of God. It was as though he were dazzled by the vision of His beauty. A little of the divine beauty had been shown to him, and all the beauty of the world had been eclipsed by it in his eyes.
The masterpieces of men, the most precious manuscripts, and even the masterpieces of God: flowers, sun, the starry heavens -- all had lost their charm for him.
And the work to which he had devoted his life, which God had willed and God had blessed, in which God had helped with His grace the labours of the Saint, answering by the gift of light and truth his prayers and tears -- even this work could hold him no longer.
Incomplete in our eyes, in the eyes of God it was finished. Brother Thomas felt it: soon God would tell him to come. Soon he would enter into the joy of the Lord. He had no more to do here below. The Saint was anxious to die.
"My daughter, look at My Heart surrounded with thorns with which ungrateful men pierce it at every moment by their blasphemies and ingratitude. You, at least, try to console Me, and say that I promise to assist at the hour of death, with all the graces necessary for salvation, all those who, on the first Saturday of five consecutive months go to confession and receive Holy Communion, recite five decades of the Rosary and keep Me company for a quarter of an hour" - The Theotokos to Sr. Lucia.

Offline Volnutt

  • Dull Sublunary Lover
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 13,656
  • too often left in the payment of false ponchos
  • Faith: Evangelical by default
  • Jurisdiction: Spiritually homeless
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #62 on: January 24, 2018, 10:35:01 AM »
Oh wow, we've found the Trad Catholic version of pasadi!
Christ my God, set my heart on fire with love in You, that in its flame I may love You with all my heart, with all my mind, and with all my soul and with all my strength, and my neighbor as myself, so that by keeping Your commandments I may glorify You the Giver of every good and perfect gift. Amen.

Offline Volnutt

  • Dull Sublunary Lover
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 13,656
  • too often left in the payment of false ponchos
  • Faith: Evangelical by default
  • Jurisdiction: Spiritually homeless
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #63 on: January 24, 2018, 10:53:38 AM »
This should be a simple answer: Roman Catholics no matter how their teachings may aline with Orthodoxy are still outside the church.
lol
Out of the 2 only the Roman Catholic Church teaches as a dogma that there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church

St Thomas stated if you don't believe in the filioque you don't have the faith
CHAPTER 31
That to believe the Holy Spirit is from the Son is necessary for salvation.
For Athanasius says in his letter to Serapion: “In accord with the command of the Apostle (Tit. 3:10): After a first and second correction avoid a heretic, even those you might see flying through the air with Elijah or walking dryshod on the water like Peter and Moses; unless they profess just as we profess that the Holy Spirit is God naturally existing from God the Son, as the son also is naturally God begotten eternally and existing of God and Father, you are not to receive them.” And again: “Have no communion with those who blaspheme and deny that the Holy Spirit is God from the nature of God the Son.”

Likewise Cyril in his Thesaurus says: “It is necessary for our salvation to confess that the Holy Spirit exists of the essence of the Son, as existing of him by nature.” Footnote So, too, Epiphanius in his book on the Trinity: “You cut yourself off from the grace of God when you do not admit the Son to be from the Father or say that the Holy Spirit is not from the Father and the Son.”

You got "chapter and verse" for those so people can look up the original contexts? I have a hard time believing that Cyril, Epiphanius (and especially Athanasius) even knew what the Filioque was, much less believed in it.

So to be saved you must have the same faith as St.Augustine, St Thomas Aquinas, St Francis Assisi...which you don't because you haven't studied enough or just refuse the truth in your stubbornness..you better rethink your position

Like you do in any meaningful sense. Your God places all His emphasis on a visible man and then says "jk guys! You're on your own!" I don't think any Father or RC Doctor would recognize that.

As I've said before, William Webster stated that Thomas's "Against the Greeks" almost completely used spurious texts / forgeries.

I've yet to see a Catholic apologist attack that claim.

Sedevacantist, can you please read this article?

https://www.christiantruth.com/articles/forgeries.html

   LivenotoneviL ,why would I pay any attention to some William Webster?

Why are you even here trying to convert us poor benighted lambs if you have no intention to respond to our arguments? Argue in bad faith much?
I respond and have  refuted all sensible arguments, some webster guy says Saint Thomas (doctor of the Church, a saint ) used forgeries is not a sensible argument , it's rubbish

Why? I don't think he's saying that Thomas lied, just that he was fooled by fake documents. How many Saints of the past believed that the Donation of Constantine was authentic?

what are you basing your opinion on, what are you saying?

I'm basing my opinion on simple common sense. Any God who would make a single office the focus of all earthly unity and salvation, as the RCC claims, and then yank the rug out on said office for 60 years is either a gamester or a charlatan.

are you saying the past 60 years the popes have had the Catholic faith?

I think they've been more Catholic than you. But really the RCC is pretty low on my list of candidates for conversion to. I'm far more likely to become Orthodox, so I don't care that much about the Papacy.
That's the difference between people like me and you, you think they're more Catholic than me, I know they're not, because I know what I'm talking about...you don't, you have  a lot to learn, especially the papacy which is biblical, the question is why don't you care about the truth?

Maybe the difference between people like me and you is enough intellectual humility to recognize that "disagreeing with me" does not automatically equal "negligence." I care about the truth, I just don't think that the RCC is it and even if I did I wouldn't think that sedevacantism is the RCC.

John chapter 21 provides more proof that Jesus entrusted all the members of His
Church to St. Peter.
John 21:15-17 “So when they had dined, Jesus saith to Simon Peter, Simon,
son of Jonas, lovest thou me more than these? He saith unto him, Yea, Lord;
thou knowest that I love thee. He saith unto him, Feed my lambs. He saith to
him again the second time, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me? He saith unto
him, Yea, Lord; thou knowest that I love thee. He saith unto him, Tend my
sheep. He saith unto him the third time, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me?
Peter was grieved because he said unto him the third time, Lovest thou me?
And he said unto him, Lord, thou knowest all things; thou knowest that I love
thee. Jesus saith unto him, Feed my sheep.
We see here, in John 21, that Jesus entrusts all of His sheep to St. Peter. The
dogmatic First Vatican Council of the Catholic Church said that this moment in John
21, after the Resurrection of Jesus, was the moment that Jesus actually gave to St.Peter the keys and the authority over His church which He had promised him in
Matthew 16.

Oh joy. Catholic Apologetics 101.

Now prove that St. Peter being entrusted with the flock=Papal Supremacy, Universal Jurisdiction, and Rome as the sole Petrine See and that you aren't just reading those ideas into Scripture and the Early Fathers instead of the other way around. Not like there aren't roughly 10,000 threads on that topic on this site alone...
like you said" so I don't care that much about the Papacy."
you don't care about the truth,

No, like I said, disagreement does not equal negligence. If I actually found Papal Supremacy arguments persuasive, I would become Catholic.

you believe some article that claims Saint Thomas and popes were duped into believing forgeries,

So you believe in the Donation of Constantine?

how about this quote..forgery right?

There is the case of the sedition at the Church of Corinth in the first century (A.D. 90-100).  The Church at Corinth asked for help from the Bishop of Rome, Pope St. Clement.  They requested him to intercede, even though the apostle John was still alive and closer in Ephesus.  This shows the Papal Primacy from the beginning.  In response Pope Clement wrote his famous epistle to the Corinthians.  In this epistle from the first century, the pope clearly uses authoritative language to command them to be subject to their local pastors.  Here are some quotes from his famous epistle:
Owing, dear brethren, to the sudden and successive calamitous events which have befallen us (i.e., the persecutions of Emperor Domitian), we feel that we have been somewhat tardy in turning our attention to the points respecting which you consulted us; and especially to that shameful and detestable sedition, utterly abhorrent to the elect of God, which a few rash and self-confident persons have kindled to such a pitch of frenzy, that your venerable and illustrious name, worthy to be universally loved, has suffered grievous injury.” (First Clement, Chapter 1)

“Ye, therefore, who laid the foundation of this sedition, submit yourselves to the presbyters, and receive correction so as to repent, bending the knees of your hearts. Learn to be subject, laying aside the proud and arrogant self-confidence of your tongue.” (First Clement, Chapter 57)

“Your schism has subverted [the faith of] many, has discouraged many, has given rise to doubt in many, and has caused grief to us all. And still your sedition continueth.” (First Clement, Chapter 46)

Or maybe John was actually dead, it's all estimations on the relative dates of these things. It's not like we have his epitaph with the exact year he died in.

Or maybe at that time, Rome was considered to have authority over Corinth but not Ephesus. Maybe the Apostles didn't like to step on one another's legacy territory even if they could. Or maybe Rome was easier to reach in this case for some other specific reason. Or maybe they wanted to write to Clement specifically since he was a companion of Paul and Paul planted the Church in Corinth (after all, various Epistles of Paul are also in response to requests or problems in one of his Churches. We might as well ask why they didn't all just correspond with Peter). Who knows?
« Last Edit: January 24, 2018, 11:01:13 AM by Volnutt »
Christ my God, set my heart on fire with love in You, that in its flame I may love You with all my heart, with all my mind, and with all my soul and with all my strength, and my neighbor as myself, so that by keeping Your commandments I may glorify You the Giver of every good and perfect gift. Amen.

Offline RaphaCam

  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 7,056
  • It is honourable to reveal the works of God
    • Em Espírito e em Verdade
  • Faith: Big-O Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Exarchate of Gotham City
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #64 on: January 24, 2018, 04:57:47 PM »
Oh wow, we've found the Trad Catholic version of pasadi!
LOL
"May the Lord our God remember in His kingdom all Holy Catholic Apostolic Church, which heralds the Word of Truth and fearlessly offers and distributes the Holy Oblation despite human deficiencies and persecutions moved by the powers of this world, in all time and unto the ages of ages."

May the Blessed Light shine Forth

Offline sedevacantist

  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 559
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #65 on: January 24, 2018, 11:33:38 PM »
This should be a simple answer: Roman Catholics no matter how their teachings may aline with Orthodoxy are still outside the church.
lol
Out of the 2 only the Roman Catholic Church teaches as a dogma that there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church

St Thomas stated if you don't believe in the filioque you don't have the faith
CHAPTER 31
That to believe the Holy Spirit is from the Son is necessary for salvation.
For Athanasius says in his letter to Serapion: “In accord with the command of the Apostle (Tit. 3:10): After a first and second correction avoid a heretic, even those you might see flying through the air with Elijah or walking dryshod on the water like Peter and Moses; unless they profess just as we profess that the Holy Spirit is God naturally existing from God the Son, as the son also is naturally God begotten eternally and existing of God and Father, you are not to receive them.” And again: “Have no communion with those who blaspheme and deny that the Holy Spirit is God from the nature of God the Son.”

Likewise Cyril in his Thesaurus says: “It is necessary for our salvation to confess that the Holy Spirit exists of the essence of the Son, as existing of him by nature.” Footnote So, too, Epiphanius in his book on the Trinity: “You cut yourself off from the grace of God when you do not admit the Son to be from the Father or say that the Holy Spirit is not from the Father and the Son.”

You got "chapter and verse" for those so people can look up the original contexts? I have a hard time believing that Cyril, Epiphanius (and especially Athanasius) even knew what the Filioque was, much less believed in it.

So to be saved you must have the same faith as St.Augustine, St Thomas Aquinas, St Francis Assisi...which you don't because you haven't studied enough or just refuse the truth in your stubbornness..you better rethink your position

Like you do in any meaningful sense. Your God places all His emphasis on a visible man and then says "jk guys! You're on your own!" I don't think any Father or RC Doctor would recognize that.

As I've said before, William Webster stated that Thomas's "Against the Greeks" almost completely used spurious texts / forgeries.

I've yet to see a Catholic apologist attack that claim.

Sedevacantist, can you please read this article?

https://www.christiantruth.com/articles/forgeries.html

   LivenotoneviL ,why would I pay any attention to some William Webster?

Why are you even here trying to convert us poor benighted lambs if you have no intention to respond to our arguments? Argue in bad faith much?
I respond and have  refuted all sensible arguments, some webster guy says Saint Thomas (doctor of the Church, a saint ) used forgeries is not a sensible argument , it's rubbish

Why? I don't think he's saying that Thomas lied, just that he was fooled by fake documents. How many Saints of the past believed that the Donation of Constantine was authentic?

what are you basing your opinion on, what are you saying?

I'm basing my opinion on simple common sense. Any God who would make a single office the focus of all earthly unity and salvation, as the RCC claims, and then yank the rug out on said office for 60 years is either a gamester or a charlatan.

are you saying the past 60 years the popes have had the Catholic faith?

I think they've been more Catholic than you. But really the RCC is pretty low on my list of candidates for conversion to. I'm far more likely to become Orthodox, so I don't care that much about the Papacy.
That's the difference between people like me and you, you think they're more Catholic than me, I know they're not, because I know what I'm talking about...you don't, you have  a lot to learn, especially the papacy which is biblical, the question is why don't you care about the truth?

Maybe the difference between people like me and you is enough intellectual humility to recognize that "disagreeing with me" does not automatically equal "negligence." I care about the truth, I just don't think that the RCC is it and even if I did I wouldn't think that sedevacantism is the RCC.

John chapter 21 provides more proof that Jesus entrusted all the members of His
Church to St. Peter.
John 21:15-17 “So when they had dined, Jesus saith to Simon Peter, Simon,
son of Jonas, lovest thou me more than these? He saith unto him, Yea, Lord;
thou knowest that I love thee. He saith unto him, Feed my lambs. He saith to
him again the second time, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me? He saith unto
him, Yea, Lord; thou knowest that I love thee. He saith unto him, Tend my
sheep. He saith unto him the third time, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me?
Peter was grieved because he said unto him the third time, Lovest thou me?
And he said unto him, Lord, thou knowest all things; thou knowest that I love
thee. Jesus saith unto him, Feed my sheep.
We see here, in John 21, that Jesus entrusts all of His sheep to St. Peter. The
dogmatic First Vatican Council of the Catholic Church said that this moment in John
21, after the Resurrection of Jesus, was the moment that Jesus actually gave to St.Peter the keys and the authority over His church which He had promised him in
Matthew 16.

Oh joy. Catholic Apologetics 101.

Now prove that St. Peter being entrusted with the flock=Papal Supremacy, Universal Jurisdiction, and Rome as the sole Petrine See and that you aren't just reading those ideas into Scripture and the Early Fathers instead of the other way around. Not like there aren't roughly 10,000 threads on that topic on this site alone...
like you said" so I don't care that much about the Papacy."
you don't care about the truth,

No, like I said, disagreement does not equal negligence. If I actually found Papal Supremacy arguments persuasive, I would become Catholic.

you believe some article that claims Saint Thomas and popes were duped into believing forgeries,

So you believe in the Donation of Constantine?

how about this quote..forgery right?

There is the case of the sedition at the Church of Corinth in the first century (A.D. 90-100).  The Church at Corinth asked for help from the Bishop of Rome, Pope St. Clement.  They requested him to intercede, even though the apostle John was still alive and closer in Ephesus.  This shows the Papal Primacy from the beginning.  In response Pope Clement wrote his famous epistle to the Corinthians.  In this epistle from the first century, the pope clearly uses authoritative language to command them to be subject to their local pastors.  Here are some quotes from his famous epistle:
Owing, dear brethren, to the sudden and successive calamitous events which have befallen us (i.e., the persecutions of Emperor Domitian), we feel that we have been somewhat tardy in turning our attention to the points respecting which you consulted us; and especially to that shameful and detestable sedition, utterly abhorrent to the elect of God, which a few rash and self-confident persons have kindled to such a pitch of frenzy, that your venerable and illustrious name, worthy to be universally loved, has suffered grievous injury.” (First Clement, Chapter 1)

“Ye, therefore, who laid the foundation of this sedition, submit yourselves to the presbyters, and receive correction so as to repent, bending the knees of your hearts. Learn to be subject, laying aside the proud and arrogant self-confidence of your tongue.” (First Clement, Chapter 57)

“Your schism has subverted [the faith of] many, has discouraged many, has given rise to doubt in many, and has caused grief to us all. And still your sedition continueth.” (First Clement, Chapter 46)

Or maybe John was actually dead, it's all estimations on the relative dates of these things. It's not like we have his epitaph with the exact year he died in.

Or maybe at that time, Rome was considered to have authority over Corinth but not Ephesus. Maybe the Apostles didn't like to step on one another's legacy territory even if they could. Or maybe Rome was easier to reach in this case for some other specific reason. Or maybe they wanted to write to Clement specifically since he was a companion of Paul and Paul planted the Church in Corinth (after all, various Epistles of Paul are also in response to requests or problems in one of his Churches. We might as well ask why they didn't all just correspond with Peter). Who knows?
or maybe you don't know what you are talking about

Offline sedevacantist

  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 559
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #66 on: January 24, 2018, 11:37:21 PM »
I respond and have  refuted all sensible arguments, some webster guy says Saint Thomas (doctor of the Church, a saint ) used forgeries is not a sensible argument , it's rubbish
Nobody said he knew about it, do you think he was he infallible or something? If even he was so careful about his own sources as to look for multiple manuscripts of the very same texts, why would you take for granted a shady Thesaurus just because it could be found trustable enough back then?
why would you put any weight on this wild theory that St Thomas unknowingly used forgeries? if it is proven they were not forgeries would you then convert to the Catholic faith? how much have you done to assure your self this wild theory is true?

Offline RaphaCam

  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 7,056
  • It is honourable to reveal the works of God
    • Em Espírito e em Verdade
  • Faith: Big-O Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Exarchate of Gotham City
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #67 on: January 25, 2018, 02:28:14 AM »
why would you put any weight on this wild theory that St Thomas unknowingly used forgeries?
It seems to be well-grounded. Isn't it weird he took so many quotes from the same compilation, and these very quotes only appear there and nowhere else earlier? lol

Quote
if it is proven they were not forgeries would you then convert to the Catholic faith?
No. My faith is not based in two or three pieces of text, but the far-fetched hypothesis that they're no forgeries would be a lot of food for thought.
« Last Edit: January 25, 2018, 02:28:44 AM by RaphaCam »
"May the Lord our God remember in His kingdom all Holy Catholic Apostolic Church, which heralds the Word of Truth and fearlessly offers and distributes the Holy Oblation despite human deficiencies and persecutions moved by the powers of this world, in all time and unto the ages of ages."

May the Blessed Light shine Forth

Offline Volnutt

  • Dull Sublunary Lover
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 13,656
  • too often left in the payment of false ponchos
  • Faith: Evangelical by default
  • Jurisdiction: Spiritually homeless
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #68 on: January 25, 2018, 11:45:27 PM »
This should be a simple answer: Roman Catholics no matter how their teachings may aline with Orthodoxy are still outside the church.
lol
Out of the 2 only the Roman Catholic Church teaches as a dogma that there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church

St Thomas stated if you don't believe in the filioque you don't have the faith
CHAPTER 31
That to believe the Holy Spirit is from the Son is necessary for salvation.
For Athanasius says in his letter to Serapion: “In accord with the command of the Apostle (Tit. 3:10): After a first and second correction avoid a heretic, even those you might see flying through the air with Elijah or walking dryshod on the water like Peter and Moses; unless they profess just as we profess that the Holy Spirit is God naturally existing from God the Son, as the son also is naturally God begotten eternally and existing of God and Father, you are not to receive them.” And again: “Have no communion with those who blaspheme and deny that the Holy Spirit is God from the nature of God the Son.”

Likewise Cyril in his Thesaurus says: “It is necessary for our salvation to confess that the Holy Spirit exists of the essence of the Son, as existing of him by nature.” Footnote So, too, Epiphanius in his book on the Trinity: “You cut yourself off from the grace of God when you do not admit the Son to be from the Father or say that the Holy Spirit is not from the Father and the Son.”

You got "chapter and verse" for those so people can look up the original contexts? I have a hard time believing that Cyril, Epiphanius (and especially Athanasius) even knew what the Filioque was, much less believed in it.

So to be saved you must have the same faith as St.Augustine, St Thomas Aquinas, St Francis Assisi...which you don't because you haven't studied enough or just refuse the truth in your stubbornness..you better rethink your position

Like you do in any meaningful sense. Your God places all His emphasis on a visible man and then says "jk guys! You're on your own!" I don't think any Father or RC Doctor would recognize that.

As I've said before, William Webster stated that Thomas's "Against the Greeks" almost completely used spurious texts / forgeries.

I've yet to see a Catholic apologist attack that claim.

Sedevacantist, can you please read this article?

https://www.christiantruth.com/articles/forgeries.html

   LivenotoneviL ,why would I pay any attention to some William Webster?

Why are you even here trying to convert us poor benighted lambs if you have no intention to respond to our arguments? Argue in bad faith much?
I respond and have  refuted all sensible arguments, some webster guy says Saint Thomas (doctor of the Church, a saint ) used forgeries is not a sensible argument , it's rubbish

Why? I don't think he's saying that Thomas lied, just that he was fooled by fake documents. How many Saints of the past believed that the Donation of Constantine was authentic?

what are you basing your opinion on, what are you saying?

I'm basing my opinion on simple common sense. Any God who would make a single office the focus of all earthly unity and salvation, as the RCC claims, and then yank the rug out on said office for 60 years is either a gamester or a charlatan.

are you saying the past 60 years the popes have had the Catholic faith?

I think they've been more Catholic than you. But really the RCC is pretty low on my list of candidates for conversion to. I'm far more likely to become Orthodox, so I don't care that much about the Papacy.
That's the difference between people like me and you, you think they're more Catholic than me, I know they're not, because I know what I'm talking about...you don't, you have  a lot to learn, especially the papacy which is biblical, the question is why don't you care about the truth?

Maybe the difference between people like me and you is enough intellectual humility to recognize that "disagreeing with me" does not automatically equal "negligence." I care about the truth, I just don't think that the RCC is it and even if I did I wouldn't think that sedevacantism is the RCC.

John chapter 21 provides more proof that Jesus entrusted all the members of His
Church to St. Peter.
John 21:15-17 “So when they had dined, Jesus saith to Simon Peter, Simon,
son of Jonas, lovest thou me more than these? He saith unto him, Yea, Lord;
thou knowest that I love thee. He saith unto him, Feed my lambs. He saith to
him again the second time, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me? He saith unto
him, Yea, Lord; thou knowest that I love thee. He saith unto him, Tend my
sheep. He saith unto him the third time, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me?
Peter was grieved because he said unto him the third time, Lovest thou me?
And he said unto him, Lord, thou knowest all things; thou knowest that I love
thee. Jesus saith unto him, Feed my sheep.
We see here, in John 21, that Jesus entrusts all of His sheep to St. Peter. The
dogmatic First Vatican Council of the Catholic Church said that this moment in John
21, after the Resurrection of Jesus, was the moment that Jesus actually gave to St.Peter the keys and the authority over His church which He had promised him in
Matthew 16.

Oh joy. Catholic Apologetics 101.

Now prove that St. Peter being entrusted with the flock=Papal Supremacy, Universal Jurisdiction, and Rome as the sole Petrine See and that you aren't just reading those ideas into Scripture and the Early Fathers instead of the other way around. Not like there aren't roughly 10,000 threads on that topic on this site alone...
like you said" so I don't care that much about the Papacy."
you don't care about the truth,

No, like I said, disagreement does not equal negligence. If I actually found Papal Supremacy arguments persuasive, I would become Catholic.

you believe some article that claims Saint Thomas and popes were duped into believing forgeries,

So you believe in the Donation of Constantine?

how about this quote..forgery right?

There is the case of the sedition at the Church of Corinth in the first century (A.D. 90-100).  The Church at Corinth asked for help from the Bishop of Rome, Pope St. Clement.  They requested him to intercede, even though the apostle John was still alive and closer in Ephesus.  This shows the Papal Primacy from the beginning.  In response Pope Clement wrote his famous epistle to the Corinthians.  In this epistle from the first century, the pope clearly uses authoritative language to command them to be subject to their local pastors.  Here are some quotes from his famous epistle:
Owing, dear brethren, to the sudden and successive calamitous events which have befallen us (i.e., the persecutions of Emperor Domitian), we feel that we have been somewhat tardy in turning our attention to the points respecting which you consulted us; and especially to that shameful and detestable sedition, utterly abhorrent to the elect of God, which a few rash and self-confident persons have kindled to such a pitch of frenzy, that your venerable and illustrious name, worthy to be universally loved, has suffered grievous injury.” (First Clement, Chapter 1)

“Ye, therefore, who laid the foundation of this sedition, submit yourselves to the presbyters, and receive correction so as to repent, bending the knees of your hearts. Learn to be subject, laying aside the proud and arrogant self-confidence of your tongue.” (First Clement, Chapter 57)

“Your schism has subverted [the faith of] many, has discouraged many, has given rise to doubt in many, and has caused grief to us all. And still your sedition continueth.” (First Clement, Chapter 46)

Or maybe John was actually dead, it's all estimations on the relative dates of these things. It's not like we have his epitaph with the exact year he died in.

Or maybe at that time, Rome was considered to have authority over Corinth but not Ephesus. Maybe the Apostles didn't like to step on one another's legacy territory even if they could. Or maybe Rome was easier to reach in this case for some other specific reason. Or maybe they wanted to write to Clement specifically since he was a companion of Paul and Paul planted the Church in Corinth (after all, various Epistles of Paul are also in response to requests or problems in one of his Churches. We might as well ask why they didn't all just correspond with Peter). Who knows?
or maybe you don't know what you are talking about

Or maybe you need to find a new go-to put down since this one's getting stale.


Yes, it's certainly possible that I'm wrong, but you've done nothing to convince me of such so far.
Christ my God, set my heart on fire with love in You, that in its flame I may love You with all my heart, with all my mind, and with all my soul and with all my strength, and my neighbor as myself, so that by keeping Your commandments I may glorify You the Giver of every good and perfect gift. Amen.

Offline Volnutt

  • Dull Sublunary Lover
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 13,656
  • too often left in the payment of false ponchos
  • Faith: Evangelical by default
  • Jurisdiction: Spiritually homeless
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #69 on: January 25, 2018, 11:49:36 PM »
I respond and have  refuted all sensible arguments, some webster guy says Saint Thomas (doctor of the Church, a saint ) used forgeries is not a sensible argument , it's rubbish
Nobody said he knew about it, do you think he was he infallible or something? If even he was so careful about his own sources as to look for multiple manuscripts of the very same texts, why would you take for granted a shady Thesaurus just because it could be found trustable enough back then?
why would you put any weight on this wild theory that St Thomas unknowingly used forgeries? if it is proven they were not forgeries would you then convert to the Catholic faith? how much have you done to assure your self this wild theory is true?

Why is it so far-fetched a possibility? For example, we know that the Donation of Constantine is bogus, yet plenty of good Catholics were unknowingly duped by it at the time.
Christ my God, set my heart on fire with love in You, that in its flame I may love You with all my heart, with all my mind, and with all my soul and with all my strength, and my neighbor as myself, so that by keeping Your commandments I may glorify You the Giver of every good and perfect gift. Amen.

Offline recent convert

  • Orthodox Chrisitan
  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 2,301
  • St.David of Wales pray for us
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Patriarchate of Antioch
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #70 on: January 26, 2018, 03:03:20 AM »
To echo reply #68: Hildegard if a I gen supported the filioque from a sincere faith in the pseudo Athanasian creed. Sadly the infamous 1054 excommunication by Humbert was clearly showing its rotten effect in the 12th c. Had not Hildegard been been victimized by these falsehoods, perhaps she would be an Orthodox saint. Perhaps she is a saint but we do not know.

I mean to eco reply # 69  and I am referring to Hildegard of Bingen
« Last Edit: January 26, 2018, 03:06:24 AM by recent convert »
Antiochian OC NA

Beware the wrath of the guardians of "love."

Offline Sharbel

  • Glory to God in all things!
  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,498
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Greek
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #71 on: January 27, 2018, 12:53:03 PM »
Hocus pocus spiritu tuo!
That may be valid, but it is illicit!
Sanctus Deus
ܩܕܝܫܐ ܐܢ̱ܬ ܠܐ ܡܝܘܬܐ
Άγιος ο Θεός

Offline Sharbel

  • Glory to God in all things!
  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,498
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Greek
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #72 on: January 27, 2018, 12:59:50 PM »
But really the RCC is pretty low on my list of candidates for conversion to. I'm far more likely to become Orthodox, so I don't care that much about the Papacy.
Regrettably, according to Bp. Baron, for every new Catholic convert there are 5 ex Catholics.  Obviously, they are not becoming more orthodox (pun intended), but less, as the various shallower forms of Protestantism are the ones whose numbers are inflating.

On one hand, I can understand the appeal of the superficially less legalistic demands of Protestantism, even if their theologies and anthropologies remain as legalistic, if not become more, than Rome's.  On the other hand, I fail to grasp the abandonment of liturgical worship, the veneration of the Mother of God and of the saints by ex Catholics.

Personally, I've found in the Orthodox Church everything that I've always loved in the Catholic Church and then some!
Sanctus Deus
ܩܕܝܫܐ ܐܢ̱ܬ ܠܐ ܡܝܘܬܐ
Άγιος ο Θεός

Offline juliogb

  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 827
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #73 on: March 12, 2018, 07:58:16 AM »
Quote
I fail to grasp the abandonment of liturgical worship

Idk about our country, but in Brazil, the lines that separate a mass and a protestant service are getting thiner, for some roman catholics that become protestant, the service dont change too much.

Offline Volnutt

  • Dull Sublunary Lover
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 13,656
  • too often left in the payment of false ponchos
  • Faith: Evangelical by default
  • Jurisdiction: Spiritually homeless
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #74 on: March 12, 2018, 01:21:04 PM »
But really the RCC is pretty low on my list of candidates for conversion to. I'm far more likely to become Orthodox, so I don't care that much about the Papacy.
Regrettably, according to Bp. Baron, for every new Catholic convert there are 5 ex Catholics.  Obviously, they are not becoming more orthodox (pun intended), but less, as the various shallower forms of Protestantism are the ones whose numbers are inflating.

On one hand, I can understand the appeal of the superficially less legalistic demands of Protestantism, even if their theologies and anthropologies remain as legalistic, if not become more, than Rome's.  On the other hand, I fail to grasp the abandonment of liturgical worship, the veneration of the Mother of God and of the saints by ex Catholics.

Personally, I've found in the Orthodox Church everything that I've always loved in the Catholic Church and then some!

Yeah, I tend to agree. At this point, the only thing that might keep me Protestant is assurance of salvation/sola fide.

Even then, though, I'd likely still pray in private in a more or less Orthodox manner (putting up with Low Church crap in public if I had to for the sake of community). So, if I do decide to abandon that doctrine, I'll do it for Orthodoxy (barring something that really convinces me of Papal Supremacy).
« Last Edit: March 12, 2018, 01:28:38 PM by Volnutt »
Christ my God, set my heart on fire with love in You, that in its flame I may love You with all my heart, with all my mind, and with all my soul and with all my strength, and my neighbor as myself, so that by keeping Your commandments I may glorify You the Giver of every good and perfect gift. Amen.

Offline Volnutt

  • Dull Sublunary Lover
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 13,656
  • too often left in the payment of false ponchos
  • Faith: Evangelical by default
  • Jurisdiction: Spiritually homeless
Re: Roman Catholic saints who are or are not compatible with Orthodoxy
« Reply #75 on: March 12, 2018, 01:27:55 PM »
Quote
I fail to grasp the abandonment of liturgical worship

Idk about our country, but in Brazil, the lines that separate a mass and a protestant service are getting thiner, for some roman catholics that become protestant, the service dont change too much.

I imagine that's true in a lot of RCC parishes in the US, too.
Christ my God, set my heart on fire with love in You, that in its flame I may love You with all my heart, with all my mind, and with all my soul and with all my strength, and my neighbor as myself, so that by keeping Your commandments I may glorify You the Giver of every good and perfect gift. Amen.