We should start a campaign to get it declared a robber council or something!
By who ? There is no emperor to restrain, and the globalist have their puppet bishops promoting the one world religion, preparing the way for the one world ruler.
Relax, Alex Jones. He was just making fun of me for a stupid post in another thread.
I know that I might kill all kinds of credibility in terms of my legitimacy of opinions by saying this - but is it really so "out-there" to think that we're, unfortunately, heading in that direction?
As a student who has taken courses on International Theory, many Liberals (as in, International Theory Liberals, not Political Liberals.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberalism_(international_relations) ) advocate for a greater implementation of Collective Security (United Nations Cooperation) and a forced placement of liberal (American) values - and even a portion of Realists, who believe that the best solution to the problem of International Anarchy is the establishment of a World Government above the governments, I can say that such an idea doesn't only exist within the realms of online conspiracy theorists.
And considering that globalism is an idea that is on the constant increase over time, is the form of a "World Government" - at least in the form of a more robust United Nations that actually accomplishes things - a thing that is way beyond the realms of possibility?
Now, like anybody who has a rudimentary understanding of politics, I recognize the fact that there is a direct relationship between the amount of power necessary / authoritarianism and the size of the country in question (this can easily be seen historically; compare the authoritarianism of the Roman Empire to the Roman Republic; compare the authoritarianism of Imperial Russia to other Western European countries at the time; compare the United States's federal authoritarianism in 1800 to now) so in order for such a "World Government" to be effective, it needs to be rather despotic in its power - and considering the moral values which decay over time as well, I can see this as easily being problematic particularly for Traditional Christians or those who seek a sense of individuality, in an international community which has rejected such vital values and beliefs in Christ and / or God.
Whether or not such an idea attempting to be propagated by the Freemasons, or some complex network of Satanists - or maybe just some billionaires who will be gluttonous for power until it collapses on them - or just the devil trying to get people to believe the most important thing in life is an earthly utopia - that is a separate subject. To say that such a theory is completely out of the possibility for the future I think is incorrect.
I don't see it happening too soon - as someone who is more of a Realist myself, good-luck trying to get the United States to give up their power monopoly on the world - unless they are in full compliance and will be the kings of such a new order.
When it comes to a "one-world religion," I think that - if not propagated by Satanic or Masonic societies, it is most likely a result of the devil forcing men to realize that worldly cares are of most importance and not Christ.
How this relates to the coming Antichrist? I don't know, but I know for certain that I don't want to witness this terrible tribulation.