Author Topic: The "Arabic" Canons of Nicaea being pro-Papist?  (Read 1192 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online LivenotoneviL

  • A Hopeful Sinner
  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,460
  • Saint Peter of Moscow, Pray for Us!
  • Faith: Outside the Church
  • Jurisdiction: None, unfortunately. Hopefully soon.
The "Arabic" Canons of Nicaea being pro-Papist?
« on: November 08, 2017, 03:51:38 PM »
As of recently, I've kind of had a little bit of a relapse in terms of my Faith in Orthodoxy - for some reason, maybe its my nostalgia for Western rite Liturgical Tradition which I miss deeply and am longing for. Not to mention that there are still some Roman Catholic saints in terms of their lives which are close to my heart, including Thomas Aquinas, Clare of Assisi, John Bosco, Philip Neri (who actually advocated for the Jesus Prayer during periods of great temptation), Alphonsus Ligori, etc.

Although I'm not to a point where I am like 50% 50% confident, it has gone from 90% to 10% confident in Orthodoxy vs. Catholicism to that of like 66 2/3% to 33 1/3%.

In terms of my continued research into the Papacy, one Catholic apologist brought up the "Arabic" Canons of Nicaea, forgeries which supposedly originate from the East but are very explicit in terms of the universal jurisdiction of the Pope.

The argument is, that even though it is in fact a forgery, the fact that it originates in the East is a testament that even the Easterners believed and subscribed to Papal Universal Jurisdiction from the beginning, and would've used Papal Jurisdiction to legitimize such a forgery.

It includes language and vocabulary that seems very explicit and pro-Roman Catholic, including such terms as "Vicar of Christ" and the necessity of obeying the Pope.

CANON XXXIX.
"Of the care and power which a Patriarch has over the bishops and archbishops of his patriarchate; and of the primacy of the Bishop of Rome over all.
Let the patriarch consider what things are done by the archbishops and bishops in their provinces; and if he shall find anything done by them otherwise than it should be, let him change it, and order it, as seemeth him fit: for he is the father of all, and they are his sons. And although the archbishop be among the bishops as an elder brother, who hath the care of his brethren, and to whom they owe obedience because he is over them; yet the patriarch is to all those who are under his power, just as he who holds the seat of Rome, is the head and prince of all patriarchs; in-asmuch as he is first, as was Peter, to whom power is given over all Christian princes, and over all their peoples, as he who is the Vicar of Christ our Lord over all peoples and over the whole Christian Church, and whoever shall contradict this, is excommunicated by the Synod."

However, I cannot find ANY information about these "Arabic Canons" and when they originate in terms of time period, and where they originate geographically. It would make sense if such canons originated post-schism in Lebanon (as I don't recall the term "Vicar of Christ" being used up until the Fourth Lateran Council), but if they originated in Antioch pre-schism around the time of Nicaea, it really harms the Orthodox claim of there not being a Papal Supreme Jurisdiction from the beginning.

Is there any information available about these canons?
« Last Edit: November 08, 2017, 03:52:57 PM by LivenotoneviL »
"Вознеслся еси во славе, Христе Боже наш, радость сотворивый учеником, обетованием Свтаго Духа, извещенным им бывшим благословением, яко Ты еси Сын Божий, Избавитель мира."

May God one day unite me with the Holy Orthodox Catholic Church. And may God forgive me for my consistent sins of the flesh and any blasphemous and carnal desire, as well as forgive me whenever I act prideful, against the desire of my Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, to be a Temple of the Holy Spirit.

Offline xOrthodox4Christx

  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 7,322
  • Faith: Orthodox Catholic Church
  • Jurisdiction: Orthodox Church in America
Re: The "Arabic" Canons of Nicaea being pro-Papist?
« Reply #1 on: November 08, 2017, 04:02:19 PM »
So, I didn't find any trace of those canons either when I asked about them. I think it's just that, a forgery. I have found no evidence of such a collection of canons anywhere.

Anyway, I wouldn't go on this text alone to convert to the Roman Catholic Church. There's a lot more that I would need than just one anonymous canon.

Rome teaches Papal infallibility exists from apostolic times, not from the ancient period of the Church or the medieval period of the Church. So, I would need more than just this to go on, personally.

Update: I found an entry about these canons on the Coptic Encyclopedia http://ccdl.libraries.claremont.edu/cdm/ref/collection/cce/id/1444

It appears that these books were translated by Nestorians and the Melkites and the Oriental Orthodox Church adopted them to spite the Muslims? It sounds fishy and weird.
« Last Edit: November 08, 2017, 04:06:00 PM by xOrthodox4Christx »
I reject all that I wrote that isn't in accordance with the teachings of the Orthodox Church. Also, my posts reflect my opinions (present or former) and nothing else.

Online LivenotoneviL

  • A Hopeful Sinner
  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,460
  • Saint Peter of Moscow, Pray for Us!
  • Faith: Outside the Church
  • Jurisdiction: None, unfortunately. Hopefully soon.
Re: The "Arabic" Canons of Nicaea being pro-Papist?
« Reply #2 on: November 08, 2017, 04:10:36 PM »
So, I didn't find any trace of those canons either when I asked about them. I think it's just that, a forgery. I have found no evidence of such a collection of canons anywhere.

Anyway, I wouldn't go on this text alone to convert to the Roman Catholic Church. There's a lot more that I would need than just one anonymous canon.

Rome teaches Papal infallibility exists from apostolic times, not from the ancient period of the Church or the medieval period of the Church. So, I would need more than just this to go on, personally.

Update: I found an entry about these canons on the Coptic Encyclopedia http://ccdl.libraries.claremont.edu/cdm/ref/collection/cce/id/1444

It appears that these books were translated by Nestorians and the Melkites and the Oriental Orthodox Church adopted them to spite the Muslims? It sounds fishy and weird.

Liturgical preference and emotional sentiment don't outweigh a legitimate relationship with God and a place where there are blazing flames, hellish demons, sleepless worms, and eternal darkness.

Nonetheless, it has harmed my relationship with God and is making me question my polarized confidence with the Orthodox Church.

Like "what if I'm wrong about Orthodoxy, and what if I'm just shooting myself in the foot for no reason?"

Not to mention that during a period of time in which I looked into Traditional Catholicism, some old habits - which I don't know if they were healthy spiritually, but they helped me nonetheless fight sin - I also am missing from my spiritual life, like saying the Roman Catholic hours and trying to say a Rosary every day.
« Last Edit: November 08, 2017, 04:13:15 PM by LivenotoneviL »
"Вознеслся еси во славе, Христе Боже наш, радость сотворивый учеником, обетованием Свтаго Духа, извещенным им бывшим благословением, яко Ты еси Сын Божий, Избавитель мира."

May God one day unite me with the Holy Orthodox Catholic Church. And may God forgive me for my consistent sins of the flesh and any blasphemous and carnal desire, as well as forgive me whenever I act prideful, against the desire of my Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, to be a Temple of the Holy Spirit.

Online LivenotoneviL

  • A Hopeful Sinner
  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,460
  • Saint Peter of Moscow, Pray for Us!
  • Faith: Outside the Church
  • Jurisdiction: None, unfortunately. Hopefully soon.
Re: The "Arabic" Canons of Nicaea being pro-Papist?
« Reply #3 on: November 08, 2017, 04:23:44 PM »
So, I didn't find any trace of those canons either when I asked about them. I think it's just that, a forgery. I have found no evidence of such a collection of canons anywhere.

Anyway, I wouldn't go on this text alone to convert to the Roman Catholic Church. There's a lot more that I would need than just one anonymous canon.

Rome teaches Papal infallibility exists from apostolic times, not from the ancient period of the Church or the medieval period of the Church. So, I would need more than just this to go on, personally.

Update: I found an entry about these canons on the Coptic Encyclopedia http://ccdl.libraries.claremont.edu/cdm/ref/collection/cce/id/1444

It appears that these books were translated by Nestorians and the Melkites and the Oriental Orthodox Church adopted them to spite the Muslims? It sounds fishy and weird.


Bizarre....
« Last Edit: November 08, 2017, 04:27:44 PM by LivenotoneviL »
"Вознеслся еси во славе, Христе Боже наш, радость сотворивый учеником, обетованием Свтаго Духа, извещенным им бывшим благословением, яко Ты еси Сын Божий, Избавитель мира."

May God one day unite me with the Holy Orthodox Catholic Church. And may God forgive me for my consistent sins of the flesh and any blasphemous and carnal desire, as well as forgive me whenever I act prideful, against the desire of my Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, to be a Temple of the Holy Spirit.

Offline Dominika

  • Troublesome Sheep
  • Global Moderator
  • Protokentarchos
  • ******
  • Posts: 5,297
  • Serbian/Polish
    • My youtube channel
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: POC, but my heart belongs to Antioch
Re: The "Arabic" Canons of Nicaea being pro-Papist?
« Reply #4 on: November 08, 2017, 04:31:00 PM »
Quote
Nicaea promulgated 20 disciplinary decrees (cf. Conciliorum oecumenicorum decreta 5–15). In later times certain Syriac and Arabic canons (pseudonicaeni ) were falsely attributed to the council.

Source

You can read more there

I have a PDF manuscript of the Church canons in Arabic, I haven't found the additional ones. (Edit: you can see it there)

The canons of Nicea in Arabic you can find there there; as you can see, tehre are only 20.

« Last Edit: November 08, 2017, 04:32:22 PM by Dominika »
Pray for persecuted Christians, especially in Serbian Kosovo and Raška, Egypt and Syria

My Orthodox liturgical blog "For what eat, while you can fast" in Polish (videos featuring chants in different languages)

Offline xOrthodox4Christx

  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 7,322
  • Faith: Orthodox Catholic Church
  • Jurisdiction: Orthodox Church in America
Re: The "Arabic" Canons of Nicaea being pro-Papist?
« Reply #5 on: November 08, 2017, 06:04:23 PM »
So, I didn't find any trace of those canons either when I asked about them. I think it's just that, a forgery. I have found no evidence of such a collection of canons anywhere.

Anyway, I wouldn't go on this text alone to convert to the Roman Catholic Church. There's a lot more that I would need than just one anonymous canon.

Rome teaches Papal infallibility exists from apostolic times, not from the ancient period of the Church or the medieval period of the Church. So, I would need more than just this to go on, personally.

Update: I found an entry about these canons on the Coptic Encyclopedia http://ccdl.libraries.claremont.edu/cdm/ref/collection/cce/id/1444

It appears that these books were translated by Nestorians and the Melkites and the Oriental Orthodox Church adopted them to spite the Muslims? It sounds fishy and weird.

Liturgical preference and emotional sentiment don't outweigh a legitimate relationship with God and a place where there are blazing flames, hellish demons, sleepless worms, and eternal darkness.

Nonetheless, it has harmed my relationship with God and is making me question my polarized confidence with the Orthodox Church.

Like "what if I'm wrong about Orthodoxy, and what if I'm just shooting myself in the foot for no reason?"

Not to mention that during a period of time in which I looked into Traditional Catholicism, some old habits - which I don't know if they were healthy spiritually, but they helped me nonetheless fight sin - I also am missing from my spiritual life, like saying the Roman Catholic hours and trying to say a Rosary every day.

The opposite with me. I found almost no spirituality in the Roman Catholic Church I attended, albeit briefly. But I am always cognizant of God at an Orthodox liturgy, and I'm always moved. And lastly, there's been a couple unexplained experiences I've had during communion that make it hard for me to reject it.

But this is all my subjective experience, and you have yours. Another, somewhat related thing to mention, is that I've met at least one other apostate (other than me that is,) who joined the Protestant Churches, and he said something like "icons don't do anything for me" or something or other.

Anyway, what's important is what God wants, not what I want. Assuming that the same held true for me, I'm convicted by my own experiences and by historical reality that I simply cannot abandon Orthodoxy. Maybe the future will hold something different, but right now it's what I've decided. Basically, just because Orthodoxy is false doesn't make Rome true. Each group needs to win me over in their own way, and Rome hasn't done that.
« Last Edit: November 08, 2017, 06:08:34 PM by xOrthodox4Christx »
I reject all that I wrote that isn't in accordance with the teachings of the Orthodox Church. Also, my posts reflect my opinions (present or former) and nothing else.

Online Mor Ephrem

  • Ο προκαθήμενος της Ορθοδοξίας - The President of Orthodoxy
  • Section Moderator
  • Hypatos
  • *****
  • Posts: 33,856
  • Two half-eggs
    • OrthodoxChristianity.net
  • Faith: The Ancienter Faith
  • Jurisdiction: But my heart belongs to FOCOF
Re: The "Arabic" Canons of Nicaea being pro-Papist?
« Reply #6 on: November 08, 2017, 06:11:48 PM »
Not to mention that during a period of time in which I looked into Traditional Catholicism, some old habits - which I don't know if they were healthy spiritually, but they helped me nonetheless fight sin - I also am missing from my spiritual life, like saying the Roman Catholic hours and trying to say a Rosary every day.

If they helped you, there's really no reason why you can't keep them or take them up again.  The RC hours are basically the book of Psalms with other biblical texts and the Rosary is primarily composed of biblical prayers as well.
Mor Ephrem is a nice guy.  Just say sorry and it will all be ok. Say I had things that were inside troubling me but I didn't know how to express appropriately. I will not behave that way again but I am seeking help.

thank you so much Mor ephrem you are a hero!

Online LivenotoneviL

  • A Hopeful Sinner
  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,460
  • Saint Peter of Moscow, Pray for Us!
  • Faith: Outside the Church
  • Jurisdiction: None, unfortunately. Hopefully soon.
Re: The "Arabic" Canons of Nicaea being pro-Papist?
« Reply #7 on: November 08, 2017, 08:07:19 PM »
So, I didn't find any trace of those canons either when I asked about them. I think it's just that, a forgery. I have found no evidence of such a collection of canons anywhere.

Anyway, I wouldn't go on this text alone to convert to the Roman Catholic Church. There's a lot more that I would need than just one anonymous canon.

Rome teaches Papal infallibility exists from apostolic times, not from the ancient period of the Church or the medieval period of the Church. So, I would need more than just this to go on, personally.

Update: I found an entry about these canons on the Coptic Encyclopedia http://ccdl.libraries.claremont.edu/cdm/ref/collection/cce/id/1444

It appears that these books were translated by Nestorians and the Melkites and the Oriental Orthodox Church adopted them to spite the Muslims? It sounds fishy and weird.

Liturgical preference and emotional sentiment don't outweigh a legitimate relationship with God and a place where there are blazing flames, hellish demons, sleepless worms, and eternal darkness.

Nonetheless, it has harmed my relationship with God and is making me question my polarized confidence with the Orthodox Church.

Like "what if I'm wrong about Orthodoxy, and what if I'm just shooting myself in the foot for no reason?"

Not to mention that during a period of time in which I looked into Traditional Catholicism, some old habits - which I don't know if they were healthy spiritually, but they helped me nonetheless fight sin - I also am missing from my spiritual life, like saying the Roman Catholic hours and trying to say a Rosary every day.

The opposite with me. I found almost no spirituality in the Roman Catholic Church I attended, albeit briefly. But I am always cognizant of God at an Orthodox liturgy, and I'm always moved. And lastly, there's been a couple unexplained experiences I've had during communion that make it hard for me to reject it.

But this is all my subjective experience, and you have yours. Another, somewhat related thing to mention, is that I've met at least one other apostate (other than me that is,) who joined the Protestant Churches, and he said something like "icons don't do anything for me" or something or other.

Anyway, what's important is what God wants, not what I want. Assuming that the same held true for me, I'm convicted by my own experiences and by historical reality that I simply cannot abandon Orthodoxy. Maybe the future will hold something different, but right now it's what I've decided. Basically, just because Orthodoxy is false doesn't make Rome true. Each group needs to win me over in their own way, and Rome hasn't done that.

When did you became an "apostate" and why, considering your experiences as you pointed out?

I should be clear that it really depends on the Roman Catholic Church in question as to where I "felt" God present -
at the couple of Tridentine Masses I've attended,

I "felt" it at "Holy Family Catholic Church" in Columbus,
and at "Saint Stephen Catholic Church" in Cleveland.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w6FQqLzebvY

(The priest there is a really nice guy and his sermons were just perfect)

I remember being moved to tears at the Kyrie Eleison in the latter church (Saint Stephen's)

And I "felt" God's presence in "Holy Name Catholic Church" in Columbus as well - but I think a lot of it had to do with the profound silence of that church and the beautiful painting of Christ in the apse (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/33/Holy_Name_Catholic_Church_%28Columbus%2C_Ohio%29_-_nave%2C_view_from_the_loft.JPG), even though this church was Novus Ordo.

Every other Roman Catholic Church I've been to was dead spiritually - God was clearly not there at all. I don't know what it was, but nothing ever moved me. Even at the Ukrainian Byzantine Catholic liturgy and the Maronite liturgy I attended were just dead - it was nothingness.

God has also been present at the Orthodox Churches I've attended. In the Church I've mainly attended at, I approached at one point the Holy of Holies entrance (during a tour of the Church), and some kind of power and fear seized me that I've never experienced in my life before - it was trembling.

Of course for me it is two moments in the Divine Liturgy of Saint John Chrysostom which always gets me - the Cherubic Hymn as well as the Epiklesis. It is these two moments where there is a profound communication with God that is unlike anything I typically experience.

Maybe all of this is just placebo effect, but I hope it is something more.
"Вознеслся еси во славе, Христе Боже наш, радость сотворивый учеником, обетованием Свтаго Духа, извещенным им бывшим благословением, яко Ты еси Сын Божий, Избавитель мира."

May God one day unite me with the Holy Orthodox Catholic Church. And may God forgive me for my consistent sins of the flesh and any blasphemous and carnal desire, as well as forgive me whenever I act prideful, against the desire of my Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, to be a Temple of the Holy Spirit.

Offline xOrthodox4Christx

  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 7,322
  • Faith: Orthodox Catholic Church
  • Jurisdiction: Orthodox Church in America
Re: The "Arabic" Canons of Nicaea being pro-Papist?
« Reply #8 on: November 08, 2017, 09:29:49 PM »
Why? Because I was spiteful, resentful and egoistic. Same reason why I was a communist.

Yeah, I mean again, it's all subjective. But I think subjective truths are just as important as objective truths. But, I mean, they are distinct and have to be approached in different ways.

As of right now, I think Orthodoxy is objectively true, in terms of history and dogma and subjectively true to me.

Quote
Maybe all of this is just placebo effect, but I hope it is something more.

I mean, to materialists, everything is just a chemical reaction in your brain. Technically, in terms of physics it's true. Everything is just quantum particles. But, I don't believe that everything is made simple merely by saying everything is physical. I think that reality is very complex, and it's not all that it appears to be. It's a very mysterious and strange thing, existence.

In any case, as long as we're talking experiences... taking communion and lining up to take communion are what have been the most moving. Not all of the time, but many times I feel like Christ is holding my soul during communion. I would've teared up if my eyes weren't completely dry from all of the white light that they're exposed to. That, and I think I might've been physically hurt by communing. So, it's stuff like that which convicts me. Although, as you say, it's not as if other people in similar states of high intensity state of mind don't experience similar things. But, again, I think reality is strange and we should assume everything is on the table. And I also think we need to look at reality through the subjective experiences, the aesthetic, spiritual, religious and the objective, history, facts, reality etc.

I take a more pragmatic approach to life, and I think I'm better for it than I was before.
« Last Edit: November 08, 2017, 09:33:46 PM by xOrthodox4Christx »
I reject all that I wrote that isn't in accordance with the teachings of the Orthodox Church. Also, my posts reflect my opinions (present or former) and nothing else.

Online LivenotoneviL

  • A Hopeful Sinner
  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,460
  • Saint Peter of Moscow, Pray for Us!
  • Faith: Outside the Church
  • Jurisdiction: None, unfortunately. Hopefully soon.
Re: The "Arabic" Canons of Nicaea being pro-Papist?
« Reply #9 on: November 08, 2017, 09:37:35 PM »
Not to mention that during a period of time in which I looked into Traditional Catholicism, some old habits - which I don't know if they were healthy spiritually, but they helped me nonetheless fight sin - I also am missing from my spiritual life, like saying the Roman Catholic hours and trying to say a Rosary every day.

If they helped you, there's really no reason why you can't keep them or take them up again.  The RC hours are basically the book of Psalms with other biblical texts and the Rosary is primarily composed of biblical prayers as well.

Where I am, considering I'm not living the Western Liturgical Tradition and I'm kind of asking these questions, and am experiencing "dubia," it wouldn't be helpful to pick up these prayers, even via the permission of my Father Confessor (who, of course, doesn't absolve me, but nonetheless whom I confess to).

It would further create a longing for the West in my heart, which would only do damage to me considering my access to the West in a canonical manner. It would be a temptation for me to find some local "High Mass."
« Last Edit: November 08, 2017, 09:39:20 PM by LivenotoneviL »
"Вознеслся еси во славе, Христе Боже наш, радость сотворивый учеником, обетованием Свтаго Духа, извещенным им бывшим благословением, яко Ты еси Сын Божий, Избавитель мира."

May God one day unite me with the Holy Orthodox Catholic Church. And may God forgive me for my consistent sins of the flesh and any blasphemous and carnal desire, as well as forgive me whenever I act prideful, against the desire of my Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, to be a Temple of the Holy Spirit.

Offline recent convert

  • Orthodox Chrisitan
  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 2,275
  • St.David of Wales pray for us
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Patriarchate of Antioch
Re: The "Arabic" Canons of Nicaea being pro-Papist?
« Reply #10 on: November 08, 2017, 09:45:01 PM »
If these documents are forged, like the donation of Constantine, then they are worthless. Centuries of justification of Papal supremacy were made from the " Constantine" document innocently, but of no ultimate value, by the likes of Aquinas. Centuries later the document was debunked making  his labor rworthless at least pertaining to this  ( I am not questioning his sincerity).
« Last Edit: November 08, 2017, 09:45:36 PM by recent convert »
Antiochian OC NA

Beware the wrath of the guardians of "love."

Offline xOrthodox4Christx

  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 7,322
  • Faith: Orthodox Catholic Church
  • Jurisdiction: Orthodox Church in America
Re: The "Arabic" Canons of Nicaea being pro-Papist?
« Reply #11 on: November 08, 2017, 09:55:21 PM »
Not to mention that during a period of time in which I looked into Traditional Catholicism, some old habits - which I don't know if they were healthy spiritually, but they helped me nonetheless fight sin - I also am missing from my spiritual life, like saying the Roman Catholic hours and trying to say a Rosary every day.

If they helped you, there's really no reason why you can't keep them or take them up again.  The RC hours are basically the book of Psalms with other biblical texts and the Rosary is primarily composed of biblical prayers as well.

Where I am, considering I'm not living the Western Liturgical Tradition and I'm kind of asking these questions, and am experiencing "dubia," it wouldn't be helpful to pick up these prayers, even via the permission of my Father Confessor (who, of course, doesn't absolve me, but nonetheless whom I confess to).

It would further create a longing for the West in my heart, which would only do damage to me considering my access to the West in a canonical manner. It would be a temptation for me to find some local "High Mass."

Although the Church is starting to act against them, there are still Western Rite parishes in our communion.
I reject all that I wrote that isn't in accordance with the teachings of the Orthodox Church. Also, my posts reflect my opinions (present or former) and nothing else.

Online Mor Ephrem

  • Ο προκαθήμενος της Ορθοδοξίας - The President of Orthodoxy
  • Section Moderator
  • Hypatos
  • *****
  • Posts: 33,856
  • Two half-eggs
    • OrthodoxChristianity.net
  • Faith: The Ancienter Faith
  • Jurisdiction: But my heart belongs to FOCOF
Re: The "Arabic" Canons of Nicaea being pro-Papist?
« Reply #12 on: November 08, 2017, 10:16:05 PM »
Not to mention that during a period of time in which I looked into Traditional Catholicism, some old habits - which I don't know if they were healthy spiritually, but they helped me nonetheless fight sin - I also am missing from my spiritual life, like saying the Roman Catholic hours and trying to say a Rosary every day.

If they helped you, there's really no reason why you can't keep them or take them up again.  The RC hours are basically the book of Psalms with other biblical texts and the Rosary is primarily composed of biblical prayers as well.

Where I am, considering I'm not living the Western Liturgical Tradition and I'm kind of asking these questions, and am experiencing "dubia," it wouldn't be helpful to pick up these prayers, even via the permission of my Father Confessor (who, of course, doesn't absolve me, but nonetheless whom I confess to).

It would further create a longing for the West in my heart, which would only do damage to me considering my access to the West in a canonical manner. It would be a temptation for me to find some local "High Mass."

I mean, if you don't want to do it, don't do it.  But "they helped me nonetheless fight sin" is not nothing. 
Mor Ephrem is a nice guy.  Just say sorry and it will all be ok. Say I had things that were inside troubling me but I didn't know how to express appropriately. I will not behave that way again but I am seeking help.

thank you so much Mor ephrem you are a hero!

Online LivenotoneviL

  • A Hopeful Sinner
  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,460
  • Saint Peter of Moscow, Pray for Us!
  • Faith: Outside the Church
  • Jurisdiction: None, unfortunately. Hopefully soon.
Re: The "Arabic" Canons of Nicaea being pro-Papist?
« Reply #13 on: November 08, 2017, 10:45:20 PM »
Not to mention that during a period of time in which I looked into Traditional Catholicism, some old habits - which I don't know if they were healthy spiritually, but they helped me nonetheless fight sin - I also am missing from my spiritual life, like saying the Roman Catholic hours and trying to say a Rosary every day.

If they helped you, there's really no reason why you can't keep them or take them up again.  The RC hours are basically the book of Psalms with other biblical texts and the Rosary is primarily composed of biblical prayers as well.

Where I am, considering I'm not living the Western Liturgical Tradition and I'm kind of asking these questions, and am experiencing "dubia," it wouldn't be helpful to pick up these prayers, even via the permission of my Father Confessor (who, of course, doesn't absolve me, but nonetheless whom I confess to).

It would further create a longing for the West in my heart, which would only do damage to me considering my access to the West in a canonical manner. It would be a temptation for me to find some local "High Mass."

Although the Church is starting to act against them, there are still Western Rite parishes in our communion.

Not where I live, at least - not where I am in life am I capable of attending Mass (as Saint Gregory the Great called Liturgy) there.
"Вознеслся еси во славе, Христе Боже наш, радость сотворивый учеником, обетованием Свтаго Духа, извещенным им бывшим благословением, яко Ты еси Сын Божий, Избавитель мира."

May God one day unite me with the Holy Orthodox Catholic Church. And may God forgive me for my consistent sins of the flesh and any blasphemous and carnal desire, as well as forgive me whenever I act prideful, against the desire of my Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, to be a Temple of the Holy Spirit.

Offline minasoliman

  • Mr., Sir, Dude, Guy, Male, tr. Minas in Greek, Menes in white people Egyptologists :-P
  • Section Moderator
  • Stratopedarches
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,190
  • Pray for me St. Severus
  • Faith: Oriental Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Coptic
Re: The "Arabic" Canons of Nicaea being pro-Papist?
« Reply #14 on: November 09, 2017, 12:01:40 AM »
Yea, I heard about these canons.  I heard from a lecture by Dr. George Bebawy that in regard to the Coptic Church, these canons were collected by Awlad Al Assal from the Nestorian church and used as a form of "Christian Sharia" for the Caliphate courts to use to judge cases regarding Christian families rather than the courts using Islamic Sharia on Christians.  It seems that the Nestorians spearheaded the collection, and Chalcedonians and non-Chalcedonians followed suit for their own communities as well.

I don't think there has been good research done on the canons that were collected and shared among the three Christian groups that were under Islamic rule.  It seems there are elements of ancient Greek conciliar laws mixed with later added laws and Islamic cultural laws in these canons.

Correction:  The Arabic Canons of Nicea seem to be different from the canons written by Al Safi ibn al Assal.  But during this time, there was a crazy collection of any and all canons to formulate a Coptic jurisprudence.
« Last Edit: November 09, 2017, 12:14:07 AM by minasoliman »
Vain existence can never exist, for "unless the LORD builds the house, the builders labor in vain." (Psalm 127)

If the faith is unchanged and rock solid, then the gates of Hades never prevailed in the end.

Offline Volnutt

  • Dull Sublunary Lover
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 11,980
  • too often left in the payment of false ponchos
  • Faith: Evangelical by default
  • Jurisdiction: Spiritually homeless
Re: The "Arabic" Canons of Nicaea being pro-Papist?
« Reply #15 on: November 09, 2017, 12:51:23 AM »
As of recently, I've kind of had a little bit of a relapse in terms of my Faith in Orthodoxy - for some reason, maybe its my nostalgia for Western rite Liturgical Tradition which I miss deeply and am longing for. Not to mention that there are still some Roman Catholic saints in terms of their lives which are close to my heart, including Thomas Aquinas, Clare of Assisi, John Bosco, Philip Neri (who actually advocated for the Jesus Prayer during periods of great temptation), Alphonsus Ligori, etc.

Although I'm not to a point where I am like 50% 50% confident, it has gone from 90% to 10% confident in Orthodoxy vs. Catholicism to that of like 66 2/3% to 33 1/3%.

In terms of my continued research into the Papacy, one Catholic apologist brought up the "Arabic" Canons of Nicaea, forgeries which supposedly originate from the East but are very explicit in terms of the universal jurisdiction of the Pope.

The argument is, that even though it is in fact a forgery, the fact that it originates in the East is a testament that even the Easterners believed and subscribed to Papal Universal Jurisdiction from the beginning, and would've used Papal Jurisdiction to legitimize such a forgery.

It includes language and vocabulary that seems very explicit and pro-Roman Catholic, including such terms as "Vicar of Christ" and the necessity of obeying the Pope.

CANON XXXIX.
"Of the care and power which a Patriarch has over the bishops and archbishops of his patriarchate; and of the primacy of the Bishop of Rome over all.
Let the patriarch consider what things are done by the archbishops and bishops in their provinces; and if he shall find anything done by them otherwise than it should be, let him change it, and order it, as seemeth him fit: for he is the father of all, and they are his sons. And although the archbishop be among the bishops as an elder brother, who hath the care of his brethren, and to whom they owe obedience because he is over them; yet the patriarch is to all those who are under his power, just as he who holds the seat of Rome, is the head and prince of all patriarchs; in-asmuch as he is first, as was Peter, to whom power is given over all Christian princes, and over all their peoples, as he who is the Vicar of Christ our Lord over all peoples and over the whole Christian Church, and whoever shall contradict this, is excommunicated by the Synod."

However, I cannot find ANY information about these "Arabic Canons" and when they originate in terms of time period, and where they originate geographically. It would make sense if such canons originated post-schism in Lebanon (as I don't recall the term "Vicar of Christ" being used up until the Fourth Lateran Council), but if they originated in Antioch pre-schism around the time of Nicaea, it really harms the Orthodox claim of there not being a Papal Supreme Jurisdiction from the beginning.

Is there any information available about these canons?

At best it proves there was one or two Arabic-speakers who believed in Papal Supremacy at some point before the schism. Whoopde-doo. The Popes had been sporadically trying to throw their weight around since Victor I, it doesn't mean they had any good basis for doing so.
On an extended hiatus from this site. Please pray for me and my family.

I'm sorry to any that my posts might offend.

Offline minasoliman

  • Mr., Sir, Dude, Guy, Male, tr. Minas in Greek, Menes in white people Egyptologists :-P
  • Section Moderator
  • Stratopedarches
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,190
  • Pray for me St. Severus
  • Faith: Oriental Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Coptic
Re: The "Arabic" Canons of Nicaea being pro-Papist?
« Reply #16 on: November 09, 2017, 01:03:50 AM »
It also comes to show that these canons did not appear until sometime after the great schism.  During this time, we also hear of the Donation of Constantine, so perhaps, in the spur of the moment, when Christians under the Islamic caliphates were trying to collect canons, this may have slipped through the cracks from the West.
Vain existence can never exist, for "unless the LORD builds the house, the builders labor in vain." (Psalm 127)

If the faith is unchanged and rock solid, then the gates of Hades never prevailed in the end.

Offline Vanhyo

  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 824
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Layman in the Bulgarian Orthodox Church
Re: The "Arabic" Canons of Nicaea being pro-Papist?
« Reply #17 on: November 09, 2017, 09:14:57 AM »
 
Quote
it really harms the Orthodox claim of there not being a Papal Supreme Jurisdiction from the beginning
If a tree is known by it fruits, and you proof that the RC is that tree, you have no other option than to become agnostic.

That tree is rotten as hell, if all the scandals, cover ups, abuses and forgeries can't convince you that they are not the immaculate body of Christ, i dont know what can...maybe you can listen to the atheist popes wild philosophizing, and take it as new revelations from heaven and development of doctrines...

Offline Volnutt

  • Dull Sublunary Lover
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 11,980
  • too often left in the payment of false ponchos
  • Faith: Evangelical by default
  • Jurisdiction: Spiritually homeless
Re: The "Arabic" Canons of Nicaea being pro-Papist?
« Reply #18 on: November 09, 2017, 09:58:53 AM »
Quote
it really harms the Orthodox claim of there not being a Papal Supreme Jurisdiction from the beginning
If a tree is known by it fruits, and you proof that the RC is that tree, you have no other option than to become agnostic.

That tree is rotten as hell, if all the scandals, cover ups, abuses

You really wanna play dueling scandals between the EO and the RC? Really?
« Last Edit: November 09, 2017, 10:01:51 AM by Volnutt »
On an extended hiatus from this site. Please pray for me and my family.

I'm sorry to any that my posts might offend.

Offline minasoliman

  • Mr., Sir, Dude, Guy, Male, tr. Minas in Greek, Menes in white people Egyptologists :-P
  • Section Moderator
  • Stratopedarches
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,190
  • Pray for me St. Severus
  • Faith: Oriental Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Coptic
Re: The "Arabic" Canons of Nicaea being pro-Papist?
« Reply #19 on: November 09, 2017, 12:04:12 PM »
Yea, if forging documents is “scandalous”, RCs are not the only ones to blame.  And we have to give credit to RCs who also were the first to prove the forgeries of documents like the donation of Constantine.
Vain existence can never exist, for "unless the LORD builds the house, the builders labor in vain." (Psalm 127)

If the faith is unchanged and rock solid, then the gates of Hades never prevailed in the end.

Offline Vanhyo

  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 824
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Layman in the Bulgarian Orthodox Church
Re: The "Arabic" Canons of Nicaea being pro-Papist?
« Reply #20 on: November 09, 2017, 01:41:03 PM »
Quote
it really harms the Orthodox claim of there not being a Papal Supreme Jurisdiction from the beginning
If a tree is known by it fruits, and you proof that the RC is that tree, you have no other option than to become agnostic.

That tree is rotten as hell, if all the scandals, cover ups, abuses

You really wanna play dueling scandals between the EO and the RC? Really?
Sure, lets debunk what you showed us bit by bit, since you lack the discernment to do yourself

Quote
You
An example of non-canonical groups as abusers.

Quote
really
What is this ? It doesn't say anything to me.
Quote

wanna
Key sentence:
After various scandals and controversies within his diocese, he voluntarily stepped down as bishop in May of 2008.
Quote
dueling
What is this ? i don't understand ...
Quote
scandals
Actually this is common, sometimes some people who have been blessed with material goods in this worlds decide to make a gift to the clergy, and this is when the antichrist media, in the spirit of judas make a report of the cleric in order to embarrass him. "See" they say, "he could feed the poor instead of having this expensive thing".
Patriarch Cyril decided not to wear this watch, because he doesn't want tempt the weak with it, nevertheless the worldly and the secular, inspired by the devil proceed to accuse.

Quote
between
The atheists are your friends now ? A quick scroll through revealed some absurdities, like parents suing monasteries over their son becoming a monk.
Quote
the

The title of this is: Man sexually abused by former priest sues Greek Orthodox diocese.

In RC, the abusers are covered not removed, not to mention the incidents are far more common.
Quote
EO
I see you had to go back to year 2005 in order to find an unproved conspiracy about some ex-RC vagante group that claims to be orthodox... just read the comments.

Quote
and
And what have schismatic "genuine" groups to do with the Orthodox Church ?

Quote
the
Exactly, in the Orthodox Church, when offenders are found they are not covered but dealt with:
immediately following his sentencing, the Ecumenical Patriarchate and the Archdiocese of North and South America defrocked Vrionis


Quote
RC
Ill not set off my ad blocker in other to view this.


I am not saying that there are never offenders in Orthodoxy, but when they are found, they are dealt with. And compering the two is an absurdity like equating a fly to an elephant...





« Last Edit: November 09, 2017, 01:43:40 PM by Vanhyo »

Online Mor Ephrem

  • Ο προκαθήμενος της Ορθοδοξίας - The President of Orthodoxy
  • Section Moderator
  • Hypatos
  • *****
  • Posts: 33,856
  • Two half-eggs
    • OrthodoxChristianity.net
  • Faith: The Ancienter Faith
  • Jurisdiction: But my heart belongs to FOCOF
Re: The "Arabic" Canons of Nicaea being pro-Papist?
« Reply #21 on: November 09, 2017, 02:26:56 PM »
I am not saying that there are never offenders in Orthodoxy, but when they are found, they are dealt with.

That's not always true, not by a long shot. 
Mor Ephrem is a nice guy.  Just say sorry and it will all be ok. Say I had things that were inside troubling me but I didn't know how to express appropriately. I will not behave that way again but I am seeking help.

thank you so much Mor ephrem you are a hero!

Offline minasoliman

  • Mr., Sir, Dude, Guy, Male, tr. Minas in Greek, Menes in white people Egyptologists :-P
  • Section Moderator
  • Stratopedarches
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,190
  • Pray for me St. Severus
  • Faith: Oriental Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Coptic
Re: The "Arabic" Canons of Nicaea being pro-Papist?
« Reply #22 on: November 09, 2017, 03:24:53 PM »
+1

I hope the removal of a rosy picture over a naive defense of ones own church does not make one lose faith over that church.  I consider myself fortunate to have saintly parish priests, but my faith does not rest on whether they have or not have scandals, even though it helps that they don’t as far as I’m aware.

So long as people are human, scandals will exist anywhere in any religion, from anyone, no matter what degree of holiness or truth one perceives in any person or institution.  That is fact.  But if you can perceive truth in your church without the bad apples, then there’s no need to resort to attacking the scandals of heterodox groups.  Their heterodoxy is sufficient to discuss.
« Last Edit: November 09, 2017, 03:27:38 PM by minasoliman »
Vain existence can never exist, for "unless the LORD builds the house, the builders labor in vain." (Psalm 127)

If the faith is unchanged and rock solid, then the gates of Hades never prevailed in the end.

Offline Volnutt

  • Dull Sublunary Lover
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 11,980
  • too often left in the payment of false ponchos
  • Faith: Evangelical by default
  • Jurisdiction: Spiritually homeless
Re: The "Arabic" Canons of Nicaea being pro-Papist?
« Reply #23 on: November 09, 2017, 11:20:22 PM »
Quote
it really harms the Orthodox claim of there not being a Papal Supreme Jurisdiction from the beginning
If a tree is known by it fruits, and you proof that the RC is that tree, you have no other option than to become agnostic.

That tree is rotten as hell, if all the scandals, cover ups, abuses

You really wanna play dueling scandals between the EO and the RC? Really?
Sure, lets debunk what you showed us bit by bit, since you lack the discernment to do yourself

Quote
You
An example of non-canonical groups as abusers.

Was it now? Everything I've seen indicates it was overseen by the Bulgarian Archdiocese. And from the point of view of the EP the OCA is noncanonical, so I'm not sure that always means anything in a discussion like this. Or do you mean because they began as HOOM? Pretty sure the academy was begun after their move to Orthodoxy and the abuse accusations are mostly (between 1991 and 2011) from after the move to canonical Orthodoxy.

Quote
really
What is this ? It doesn't say anything to me.

He was stealing money.

Quote

wanna
Key sentence:
After various scandals and controversies within his diocese, he voluntarily stepped down as bishop in May of 2008.

Which is just another form of CYA. Not as bad as just shuffling him around, sure, but still bad.

Quote
dueling
What is this ? i don't understand ...
Better link.

Quote
scandals
Actually this is common, sometimes some people who have been blessed with material goods in this worlds decide to make a gift to the clergy, and this is when the antichrist media, in the spirit of judas make a report of the cleric in order to embarrass him. "See" they say, "he could feed the poor instead of having this expensive thing".
Patriarch Cyril decided not to wear this watch, because he doesn't want tempt the weak with it, nevertheless the worldly and the secular, inspired by the devil proceed to accuse.

No, this is in no way comparable to the woman perfuming the feet of Christ. It's a personal item, not a liturgical and him wearing it is the same thing as Joel Osteen having a mansion, unjustifiable excess from an alleged man of God. And he did not "decide" not to wear it, he tried to hide it with photoshop, which is a form of lying.

Quote
between
The atheists are your friends now ?



A quick scroll through revealed some absurdities, like parents suing monasteries over their son becoming a monk.


I don't defend everything on that site, but much of it seems to be well researched and well intended.


Quote
the

The title of this is: Man sexually abused by former priest sues Greek Orthodox diocese.

Former because he's since left the priesthood, yes. He was a priest while the abuse occurred.

In RC, the abusers are covered not removed, not to mention the incidents are far more common.

Mor can probably speak to this better than I can.


Quote
EO
I see you had to go back to year 2005 in order to find an unproved conspiracy about some ex-RC vagante group that claims to be orthodox... just read the comments.

Alright, I'll concede that one. I guess I had them confused with the GOA monastery in the same area.

Quote
and
And what have schismatic "genuine" groups to do with the Orthodox Church ?

Abbot Panteleimon's abuse occurred while they were ROCOR. And even now, HTM is still so respected in Orthodoxy for it's publications, that it might as well be canonical. It can't just be written off like that.


Quote
the
Exactly, in the Orthodox Church, when offenders are found they are not covered but dealt with:
immediately following his sentencing, the Ecumenical Patriarchate and the Archdiocese of North and South America defrocked Vrionis
[/quote]

Mor can tell you how often things like that really turn out so well...

RC
Ill not set off my ad blocker in other to view this.
[/quote]

Ok. It was just about the ongoing financial magillah in the Greek Church.
« Last Edit: November 09, 2017, 11:30:40 PM by Volnutt »
On an extended hiatus from this site. Please pray for me and my family.

I'm sorry to any that my posts might offend.

Offline Volnutt

  • Dull Sublunary Lover
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 11,980
  • too often left in the payment of false ponchos
  • Faith: Evangelical by default
  • Jurisdiction: Spiritually homeless
Re: The "Arabic" Canons of Nicaea being pro-Papist?
« Reply #24 on: November 09, 2017, 11:33:10 PM »
+1

I hope the removal of a rosy picture over a naive defense of ones own church does not make one lose faith over that church.  I consider myself fortunate to have saintly parish priests, but my faith does not rest on whether they have or not have scandals, even though it helps that they don’t as far as I’m aware.

So long as people are human, scandals will exist anywhere in any religion, from anyone, no matter what degree of holiness or truth one perceives in any person or institution.  That is fact.  But if you can perceive truth in your church without the bad apples, then there’s no need to resort to attacking the scandals of heterodox groups.  Their heterodoxy is sufficient to discuss.

My thoughts exactly.
On an extended hiatus from this site. Please pray for me and my family.

I'm sorry to any that my posts might offend.

Offline Sharbel

  • Glory to God in all things!
  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,112
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Greek Metropolis of Denver
Re: The "Arabic" Canons of Nicaea being pro-Papist?
« Reply #25 on: November 19, 2017, 12:36:09 AM »
As of recently, I've kind of had a little bit of a relapse in terms of my Faith in Orthodoxy - for some reason, maybe its my nostalgia for Western rite Liturgical Tradition which I miss deeply and am longing for. Not to mention that there are still some Roman Catholic saints in terms of their lives which are close to my heart, including Thomas Aquinas, Clare of Assisi, John Bosco, Philip Neri (who actually advocated for the Jesus Prayer during periods of great temptation), Alphonsus Ligori, etc.
It's interesting that you mention these saints.  The more recent ones are romanticized beyond recognition, especially St. Claire, whose popular hagiography is an unrecognizable caricature, much like her confrere, St. Francis.

As for St. Thomas, I'm coming down to his own belated conclusion: all that he wrote is straw.  He's of course a superlative philosopher, but his rationalism limped the faith in the West divorcing it from the mystical tradition of the Church Fathers, though he often quotes them.

Quote from: LivenotoneviL
Like "what if I'm wrong about Orthodoxy, and what if I'm just shooting myself in the foot for no reason?"
St. Ignatius of Loyola's discernment of spirits may be helpful here: do such thoughts bring peace of restlessness to your heart?  If the former, they're from God; if the latter, they're from the enemy of the human race.  Still, no decision should be made in a state of restlessness, on the contrary, you should maintain the course.

Quote from: LivenotoneviL
Not to mention that during a period of time in which I looked into Traditional Catholicism, some old habits - which I don't know if they were healthy spiritually, but they helped me nonetheless fight sin - I also am missing from my spiritual life, like saying the Roman Catholic hours and trying to say a Rosary every day.
Why did you drop them?  Although I myself couldn't come around to say the Fatima Prayer, the Rosary is a fine prayer. 

As for the breviary, have you tried an Eastern breviary?  IMO the latter has much more beautiful prayers, besides the psalms, of course, which emphasize both man and God, both as each other's beloved, yet more recognizant of each one's nature. 

In my journey I have felt that the rest of my life as a Catholic doesn't cease to, but comes to its fulness as I approach the Orthodox Church.  I feel that I'm becoming more Catholic, not less.
Sanctus Deus
ܩܕܝܫܐ ܐܢ̱ܬ ܠܐ ܡܝܘܬܐ
Άγιος ο Θεός