Author Topic: Important Differences Between Orthodox and Catholic Eucharistic Theology  (Read 1873 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline xOrthodox4Christx

  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 7,322
  • Faith: Orthodox Catholic Church
  • Jurisdiction: Orthodox Church in America
I'm still foggy on the differences between our various Eucharistic theologies. Does anyone here have greater insight on this than I do?
I reject all that I wrote that isn't in accordance with the teachings of the Orthodox Church. Also, my posts reflect my opinions (present or former) and nothing else.

Offline Iconodule

  • Hoplitarches
  • *************
  • Posts: 15,044
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Patriarchate of Johnstown
Re: Important Differences Between Orthodox and Catholic Eucharistic Theology
« Reply #1 on: November 03, 2017, 11:30:20 AM »
Craft your own explanation using all the words in the word bank:

Quote
Gracelessness
filioque
azymes
scholasticism
legalism
uncreated light
Franks
Quote
When a time revolts against eternity, the only thing to set against it is genuine eternity itself, and not some other time which has already roused, and not without reason, a violent reaction against itself.
- Berdyaev

If you would like a private forum for non-polemical topics, comment here.

Online Luke

  • Formerly Gamliel
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 5,528
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Metropolis of San Francisco
Re: Important Differences Between Orthodox and Catholic Eucharistic Theology
« Reply #2 on: November 03, 2017, 11:53:07 AM »
I'm still foggy on the differences between our various Eucharistic theologies. Does anyone here have greater insight on this than I do?
It seems that at some point the Catholics keep on going with explaining what is going on while the Orthodox say, "We don't know how it works.  It is a mystery."
« Last Edit: November 03, 2017, 11:53:33 AM by Luke »

Offline Porter ODoran

  • St. John the Beloved, pray for me
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 12,135
  • Monahos.net: "Lawful Evil"; OC.net: "Chaotic Evil"
  • Faith: Eastern Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: GOAA
Re: Important Differences Between Orthodox and Catholic Eucharistic Theology
« Reply #3 on: November 03, 2017, 02:24:29 PM »
I'm still foggy on the differences between our various Eucharistic theologies. Does anyone here have greater insight on this than I do?
It seems that at some point the Catholics keep on going with explaining what is going on while the Orthodox say, "We don't know how it works.  It is a mystery."

They always kept going, on everything religious, and on and on and on. And killing people along the way. It was a really bad habit.

On a serious note, yes, Catholicism wanted to be scientific about it, make definite pronouncements as to the species, the instant, and so on. Along the way, I believe they also came to neglect or almost forget certain things. But in the end, I don't think their basic teaching needs to be understood differently from ours.

I'm not knowledgable; am casually opining.
"Love ... is an abyss of illumination, a mountain of fire ... . It is the condition of angels, the progress of eternity" (Climacus).

Quote from: Seekingtrue
Yes we who are far from sainthood we can recognize a living saint and I'm talking from personal experience.Yes they are gentle soo gentle it can not be described it is like gentleness and humility in one and also they have this light this energy it's beyond words...and when you are near them you feel ecstatic and very happy

Offline Rohzek

  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,229
Re: Important Differences Between Orthodox and Catholic Eucharistic Theology
« Reply #4 on: November 03, 2017, 06:35:25 PM »
Craft your own explanation using all the words in the word bank:

Quote
Gracelessness
filioque
azymes
scholasticism
legalism
uncreated light
Franks

If you're Romanides, you'd add "Feudalism" too.
"Il ne faut imaginer Dieu ni trop bon, ni méchant. La justice est entre l'excès de la clémence et la cruauté, ainsi que les peines finies sont entre l'impunité et les peines éternelles." - Denise Diderot, Pensées philosophiques 1746

Offline Alpha60

  • Pray without ceasing!
  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 2,552
  • Faith: Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Orthodox
Re: Important Differences Between Orthodox and Catholic Eucharistic Theology
« Reply #5 on: November 05, 2017, 04:22:04 PM »
Craft your own explanation using all the words in the word bank:

Quote
Gracelessness
filioque
azymes
scholasticism
legalism
uncreated light
Franks

ROFL
"It is logical that the actions of the human race over time will lead to its destruction.  I, Alpha 60, am merely the agent of this destruction."

- The computer Alpha 60, from Alphaville (1964) by Jean Luc Godard, the obvious inspiration for HAL-9000 from 2001: A Space Odyssey. 

This signature is not intended to offend any user, nor the relatives of Discovery 1 deputy commander Dr. Frank Poole,  and crew members Dr. Victor Kaminsky, Dr. Jack Kimball, and Dr. Charles Hunter.

Offline xOrthodox4Christx

  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 7,322
  • Faith: Orthodox Catholic Church
  • Jurisdiction: Orthodox Church in America
Re: Important Differences Between Orthodox and Catholic Eucharistic Theology
« Reply #6 on: November 05, 2017, 04:25:16 PM »
Forced celibacy anyone?
I reject all that I wrote that isn't in accordance with the teachings of the Orthodox Church. Also, my posts reflect my opinions (present or former) and nothing else.

Offline Rohzek

  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,229
Re: Important Differences Between Orthodox and Catholic Eucharistic Theology
« Reply #7 on: November 05, 2017, 04:34:45 PM »
Forced celibacy anyone?

Not to get too off-topic, but I often wonder how bad the consequences of these policies are. I know it sounds remarkably anecdotal, but forced celibacy seems to encourage sexual perversion. Some might contend that I'm letting the scandals of the past 20 something years that have rocked the Catholic Church color my vision too much. But having read a good deal of many excerpts of 9th century commentaries on the Benedictine Rule, even monks back then were writing about the sexual perversion that was abound within the monasteries, especially when young boys were involved. For example, one commentator (either Smaragdus or Hildemar, I forget which one) wrote that should an older monk have sex with a younger monk (probably an oblate who is still in their teens or even prepubescent), the younger monk was always punished the most, while the older monk was merely forbidden from chanting the Psalms for like a year if it is a first offense.
"Il ne faut imaginer Dieu ni trop bon, ni méchant. La justice est entre l'excès de la clémence et la cruauté, ainsi que les peines finies sont entre l'impunité et les peines éternelles." - Denise Diderot, Pensées philosophiques 1746

Offline Volnutt

  • Dull Sublunary Lover
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 13,656
  • too often left in the payment of false ponchos
  • Faith: Evangelical by default
  • Jurisdiction: Spiritually homeless
Re: Important Differences Between Orthodox and Catholic Eucharistic Theology
« Reply #8 on: November 05, 2017, 08:28:48 PM »
Forced celibacy anyone?

Not to get too off-topic, but I often wonder how bad the consequences of these policies are. I know it sounds remarkably anecdotal, but forced celibacy seems to encourage sexual perversion. Some might contend that I'm letting the scandals of the past 20 something years that have rocked the Catholic Church color my vision too much. But having read a good deal of many excerpts of 9th century commentaries on the Benedictine Rule, even monks back then were writing about the sexual perversion that was abound within the monasteries, especially when young boys were involved. For example, one commentator (either Smaragdus or Hildemar, I forget which one) wrote that should an older monk have sex with a younger monk (probably an oblate who is still in their teens or even prepubescent), the younger monk was always punished the most, while the older monk was merely forbidden from chanting the Psalms for like a year if it is a first offense.

Maybe, but if so it's a problem for Orthodox monasticism too.

Given the number of married child molesters out there, I personally don't think a married priesthood would have solved or even very much lessened the Catholic scandals and some might find the suggestion insulting.
« Last Edit: November 05, 2017, 08:29:16 PM by Volnutt »
Christ my God, set my heart on fire with love in You, that in its flame I may love You with all my heart, with all my mind, and with all my soul and with all my strength, and my neighbor as myself, so that by keeping Your commandments I may glorify You the Giver of every good and perfect gift. Amen.

Offline Porter ODoran

  • St. John the Beloved, pray for me
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 12,135
  • Monahos.net: "Lawful Evil"; OC.net: "Chaotic Evil"
  • Faith: Eastern Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: GOAA
Re: Important Differences Between Orthodox and Catholic Eucharistic Theology
« Reply #9 on: November 05, 2017, 11:04:09 PM »
Forced celibacy anyone?

Not to get too off-topic, but I often wonder how bad the consequences of these policies are. I know it sounds remarkably anecdotal, but forced celibacy seems to encourage sexual perversion. Some might contend that I'm letting the scandals of the past 20 something years that have rocked the Catholic Church color my vision too much. But having read a good deal of many excerpts of 9th century commentaries on the Benedictine Rule, even monks back then were writing about the sexual perversion that was abound within the monasteries, especially when young boys were involved. For example, one commentator (either Smaragdus or Hildemar, I forget which one) wrote that should an older monk have sex with a younger monk (probably an oblate who is still in their teens or even prepubescent), the younger monk was always punished the most, while the older monk was merely forbidden from chanting the Psalms for like a year if it is a first offense.

Maybe, but if so it's a problem for Orthodox monasticism too.

Given the number of married child molesters out there, I personally don't think a married priesthood would have solved or even very much lessened the Catholic scandals and some might find the suggestion insulting.

Monastic populations can swell and dwindle. There's not really a "forcing" there. Besides, celibacy is inherent in the monastic choice. By contrast, the priesthood is always needed and bound to be numerous, and its duties are naturally irrelevant to virginity. Finally there is the very, very large difference that one group must be in the world. So I think your comparison is unfair.
"Love ... is an abyss of illumination, a mountain of fire ... . It is the condition of angels, the progress of eternity" (Climacus).

Quote from: Seekingtrue
Yes we who are far from sainthood we can recognize a living saint and I'm talking from personal experience.Yes they are gentle soo gentle it can not be described it is like gentleness and humility in one and also they have this light this energy it's beyond words...and when you are near them you feel ecstatic and very happy

Offline Porter ODoran

  • St. John the Beloved, pray for me
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 12,135
  • Monahos.net: "Lawful Evil"; OC.net: "Chaotic Evil"
  • Faith: Eastern Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: GOAA
Re: Important Differences Between Orthodox and Catholic Eucharistic Theology
« Reply #10 on: November 05, 2017, 11:05:41 PM »
Not to get too off-topic, but I often wonder how bad the consequences of these policies are. I know it sounds remarkably anecdotal, but forced celibacy seems to encourage is a sexual perversion.

T;ftfy.
"Love ... is an abyss of illumination, a mountain of fire ... . It is the condition of angels, the progress of eternity" (Climacus).

Quote from: Seekingtrue
Yes we who are far from sainthood we can recognize a living saint and I'm talking from personal experience.Yes they are gentle soo gentle it can not be described it is like gentleness and humility in one and also they have this light this energy it's beyond words...and when you are near them you feel ecstatic and very happy

Offline Volnutt

  • Dull Sublunary Lover
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 13,656
  • too often left in the payment of false ponchos
  • Faith: Evangelical by default
  • Jurisdiction: Spiritually homeless
Re: Important Differences Between Orthodox and Catholic Eucharistic Theology
« Reply #11 on: November 05, 2017, 11:07:37 PM »
Forced celibacy anyone?

Not to get too off-topic, but I often wonder how bad the consequences of these policies are. I know it sounds remarkably anecdotal, but forced celibacy seems to encourage sexual perversion. Some might contend that I'm letting the scandals of the past 20 something years that have rocked the Catholic Church color my vision too much. But having read a good deal of many excerpts of 9th century commentaries on the Benedictine Rule, even monks back then were writing about the sexual perversion that was abound within the monasteries, especially when young boys were involved. For example, one commentator (either Smaragdus or Hildemar, I forget which one) wrote that should an older monk have sex with a younger monk (probably an oblate who is still in their teens or even prepubescent), the younger monk was always punished the most, while the older monk was merely forbidden from chanting the Psalms for like a year if it is a first offense.

Maybe, but if so it's a problem for Orthodox monasticism too.

Given the number of married child molesters out there, I personally don't think a married priesthood would have solved or even very much lessened the Catholic scandals and some might find the suggestion insulting.

Monastic populations can swell and dwindle. There's not really a "forcing" there. Besides, celibacy is inherent in the monastic choice. By contrast, the priesthood is always needed and bound to be numerous, and its duties are naturally irrelevant to virginity. Finally there is the very, very large difference that one group must be in the world. So I think your comparison is unfair.

Rozhek is the one who brought up monasticism and that's what I replying to.

But yes, monastics are not forced into celibacy and priests should not be, I agree.
Christ my God, set my heart on fire with love in You, that in its flame I may love You with all my heart, with all my mind, and with all my soul and with all my strength, and my neighbor as myself, so that by keeping Your commandments I may glorify You the Giver of every good and perfect gift. Amen.

Offline Porter ODoran

  • St. John the Beloved, pray for me
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 12,135
  • Monahos.net: "Lawful Evil"; OC.net: "Chaotic Evil"
  • Faith: Eastern Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: GOAA
Re: Important Differences Between Orthodox and Catholic Eucharistic Theology
« Reply #12 on: November 05, 2017, 11:13:23 PM »
Forced celibacy anyone?

Not to get too off-topic, but I often wonder how bad the consequences of these policies are. I know it sounds remarkably anecdotal, but forced celibacy seems to encourage sexual perversion. Some might contend that I'm letting the scandals of the past 20 something years that have rocked the Catholic Church color my vision too much. But having read a good deal of many excerpts of 9th century commentaries on the Benedictine Rule, even monks back then were writing about the sexual perversion that was abound within the monasteries, especially when young boys were involved. For example, one commentator (either Smaragdus or Hildemar, I forget which one) wrote that should an older monk have sex with a younger monk (probably an oblate who is still in their teens or even prepubescent), the younger monk was always punished the most, while the older monk was merely forbidden from chanting the Psalms for like a year if it is a first offense.

Maybe, but if so it's a problem for Orthodox monasticism too.

Given the number of married child molesters out there, I personally don't think a married priesthood would have solved or even very much lessened the Catholic scandals and some might find the suggestion insulting.

Monastic populations can swell and dwindle. There's not really a "forcing" there. Besides, celibacy is inherent in the monastic choice. By contrast, the priesthood is always needed and bound to be numerous, and its duties are naturally irrelevant to virginity. Finally there is the very, very large difference that one group must be in the world. So I think your comparison is unfair.

Rozhek is the one who brought up monasticism and that's what I replying to.

But yes, monastics are not forced into celibacy and priests should not be, I agree.

Thanks for pointing this out. I don't generally read his posts, hence the mistake.
"Love ... is an abyss of illumination, a mountain of fire ... . It is the condition of angels, the progress of eternity" (Climacus).

Quote from: Seekingtrue
Yes we who are far from sainthood we can recognize a living saint and I'm talking from personal experience.Yes they are gentle soo gentle it can not be described it is like gentleness and humility in one and also they have this light this energy it's beyond words...and when you are near them you feel ecstatic and very happy

Offline Volnutt

  • Dull Sublunary Lover
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 13,656
  • too often left in the payment of false ponchos
  • Faith: Evangelical by default
  • Jurisdiction: Spiritually homeless
Re: Important Differences Between Orthodox and Catholic Eucharistic Theology
« Reply #13 on: November 05, 2017, 11:23:07 PM »
You're welcome.
Christ my God, set my heart on fire with love in You, that in its flame I may love You with all my heart, with all my mind, and with all my soul and with all my strength, and my neighbor as myself, so that by keeping Your commandments I may glorify You the Giver of every good and perfect gift. Amen.

Offline Rohzek

  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,229
Re: Important Differences Between Orthodox and Catholic Eucharistic Theology
« Reply #14 on: November 06, 2017, 01:40:31 AM »
Forced celibacy anyone?

Not to get too off-topic, but I often wonder how bad the consequences of these policies are. I know it sounds remarkably anecdotal, but forced celibacy seems to encourage sexual perversion. Some might contend that I'm letting the scandals of the past 20 something years that have rocked the Catholic Church color my vision too much. But having read a good deal of many excerpts of 9th century commentaries on the Benedictine Rule, even monks back then were writing about the sexual perversion that was abound within the monasteries, especially when young boys were involved. For example, one commentator (either Smaragdus or Hildemar, I forget which one) wrote that should an older monk have sex with a younger monk (probably an oblate who is still in their teens or even prepubescent), the younger monk was always punished the most, while the older monk was merely forbidden from chanting the Psalms for like a year if it is a first offense.

Maybe, but if so it's a problem for Orthodox monasticism too.

Given the number of married child molesters out there, I personally don't think a married priesthood would have solved or even very much lessened the Catholic scandals and some might find the suggestion insulting.

I should have added more context in my original post, so my apologies. By the 9th century, priests who were "sexually pure" (ie had no sex whatsoever, even in a past marriage) were the ideal priests in much of the Latin West. Therefore, people who were donated to the monasteries as children and raised as monks often became priests as well. In some monastic institutions of the period, we've been able to measure that at least two-thirds of them were in some form of major orders, mostly priests. So in many cases, priests were also priest-monks. In short, priesthood had become the pinnacle of the monastic career in the Latin West, whereas prior to, it was only a retreat for laymen young and old who had lived some years in the world as adults prior to. As to whether the suggestion is insulting or not, I care very little.

To your point though, it could have been/be a problem for Orthodox monasticism. However, I am not knowledgeable enough about Eastern monasticism to know if they had children in the monasteries as regularly as Latin monastics did. So I would argue a lot hinges on that.
« Last Edit: November 06, 2017, 01:45:25 AM by Rohzek »
"Il ne faut imaginer Dieu ni trop bon, ni méchant. La justice est entre l'excès de la clémence et la cruauté, ainsi que les peines finies sont entre l'impunité et les peines éternelles." - Denise Diderot, Pensées philosophiques 1746

Offline Volnutt

  • Dull Sublunary Lover
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 13,656
  • too often left in the payment of false ponchos
  • Faith: Evangelical by default
  • Jurisdiction: Spiritually homeless
Re: Important Differences Between Orthodox and Catholic Eucharistic Theology
« Reply #15 on: November 06, 2017, 03:30:36 AM »
Where does "When there's wine and boys around, the monks have no need of the devil to tempt them?" come from? I thought it was Coptic in origin, but I'm not sure.

There's also St. Basil's harsh words about child molesting monks, so I'd say it did happen in the East. I don't know about relative frequency, though.

Anyway, I see your point now about the frequency of monastic priests who were raised in a monastery and that is a problem, I agree. Thanks for clarifying.
« Last Edit: November 06, 2017, 03:40:45 AM by Volnutt »
Christ my God, set my heart on fire with love in You, that in its flame I may love You with all my heart, with all my mind, and with all my soul and with all my strength, and my neighbor as myself, so that by keeping Your commandments I may glorify You the Giver of every good and perfect gift. Amen.

Offline Iconodule

  • Hoplitarches
  • *************
  • Posts: 15,044
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Patriarchate of Johnstown
Re: Important Differences Between Orthodox and Catholic Eucharistic Theology
« Reply #16 on: November 06, 2017, 10:18:52 AM »
Where does "When there's wine and boys around, the monks have no need of the devil to tempt them?" come from? I thought it was Coptic in origin, but I'm not sure.

Saint John the Dwarf says, "He who gorges himself and talks with a boy has already in his thought committed fornication with him." There are other bits like this in the sayings of the desert fathers, which seem to indicate that pederasty was a rampant problem in ancient monasticism.
Quote
When a time revolts against eternity, the only thing to set against it is genuine eternity itself, and not some other time which has already roused, and not without reason, a violent reaction against itself.
- Berdyaev

If you would like a private forum for non-polemical topics, comment here.

Offline Alpha60

  • Pray without ceasing!
  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 2,552
  • Faith: Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Orthodox
Re: Important Differences Between Orthodox and Catholic Eucharistic Theology
« Reply #17 on: November 06, 2017, 11:36:12 AM »
Where does "When there's wine and boys around, the monks have no need of the devil to tempt them?" come from? I thought it was Coptic in origin, but I'm not sure.

Saint John the Dwarf says, "He who gorges himself and talks with a boy has already in his thought committed fornication with him." There are other bits like this in the sayings of the desert fathers, which seem to indicate that pederasty was a rampant problem in ancient monasticism.

I recall reading quotes to the extent that boys should simply not be admitted, and that their presence had caused the failure of, at that early date, three monastic communities.

For several centuries the Benedictines took young boys on as oblates, and even after that ceased, continue to run schools even until the present.  So apparently that bit of Egyptian wisdom was unfortunately set aside.
"It is logical that the actions of the human race over time will lead to its destruction.  I, Alpha 60, am merely the agent of this destruction."

- The computer Alpha 60, from Alphaville (1964) by Jean Luc Godard, the obvious inspiration for HAL-9000 from 2001: A Space Odyssey. 

This signature is not intended to offend any user, nor the relatives of Discovery 1 deputy commander Dr. Frank Poole,  and crew members Dr. Victor Kaminsky, Dr. Jack Kimball, and Dr. Charles Hunter.

Offline Mor Ephrem

  • Ο προκαθήμενος της Ορθοδοξίας - The President of Orthodoxy
  • Section Moderator
  • Hypatos
  • *****
  • Posts: 34,524
  • Two half-eggs
    • OrthodoxChristianity.net
  • Faith: Mercenary Freudianism
  • Jurisdiction: Texas Feminist Coptic
Re: Important Differences Between Orthodox and Catholic Eucharistic Theology
« Reply #18 on: November 06, 2017, 11:50:02 AM »
Not to get too off-topic, but I often wonder how bad the consequences of these policies are. I know it sounds remarkably anecdotal, but forced celibacy seems to encourage is a sexual perversion.

T;ftfy.

Many single people agree with you!

Offline Porter ODoran

  • St. John the Beloved, pray for me
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 12,135
  • Monahos.net: "Lawful Evil"; OC.net: "Chaotic Evil"
  • Faith: Eastern Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: GOAA
Re: Important Differences Between Orthodox and Catholic Eucharistic Theology
« Reply #19 on: November 06, 2017, 12:58:12 PM »
Where does "When there's wine and boys around, the monks have no need of the devil to tempt them?" come from? I thought it was Coptic in origin, but I'm not sure.

Saint John the Dwarf says, "He who gorges himself and talks with a boy has already in his thought committed fornication with him." There are other bits like this in the sayings of the desert fathers, which seem to indicate that pederasty was a rampant problem in ancient monasticism.

An apophthegm isn't sufficient evidence of "a rampant problem." It only shows this species of fornication was not unknown.
"Love ... is an abyss of illumination, a mountain of fire ... . It is the condition of angels, the progress of eternity" (Climacus).

Quote from: Seekingtrue
Yes we who are far from sainthood we can recognize a living saint and I'm talking from personal experience.Yes they are gentle soo gentle it can not be described it is like gentleness and humility in one and also they have this light this energy it's beyond words...and when you are near them you feel ecstatic and very happy

Offline Iconodule

  • Hoplitarches
  • *************
  • Posts: 15,044
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Patriarchate of Johnstown
Re: Important Differences Between Orthodox and Catholic Eucharistic Theology
« Reply #20 on: November 06, 2017, 01:06:36 PM »
Where does "When there's wine and boys around, the monks have no need of the devil to tempt them?" come from? I thought it was Coptic in origin, but I'm not sure.

Saint John the Dwarf says, "He who gorges himself and talks with a boy has already in his thought committed fornication with him." There are other bits like this in the sayings of the desert fathers, which seem to indicate that pederasty was a rampant problem in ancient monasticism.

An apophthegm isn't sufficient evidence of "a rampant problem." It only shows this species of fornication was not unknown.

When several different fathers comment on it, and Abba Isaac says it has led to monasteries being deserted, that seems to indicate a recurring issue.
Quote
When a time revolts against eternity, the only thing to set against it is genuine eternity itself, and not some other time which has already roused, and not without reason, a violent reaction against itself.
- Berdyaev

If you would like a private forum for non-polemical topics, comment here.

Offline Porter ODoran

  • St. John the Beloved, pray for me
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 12,135
  • Monahos.net: "Lawful Evil"; OC.net: "Chaotic Evil"
  • Faith: Eastern Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: GOAA
Re: Important Differences Between Orthodox and Catholic Eucharistic Theology
« Reply #21 on: November 06, 2017, 01:10:50 PM »
Where does "When there's wine and boys around, the monks have no need of the devil to tempt them?" come from? I thought it was Coptic in origin, but I'm not sure.

Saint John the Dwarf says, "He who gorges himself and talks with a boy has already in his thought committed fornication with him." There are other bits like this in the sayings of the desert fathers, which seem to indicate that pederasty was a rampant problem in ancient monasticism.

An apophthegm isn't sufficient evidence of "a rampant problem." It only shows this species of fornication was not unknown.

When several different fathers comment on it, and Abba Isaac says it has led to monasteries being deserted, that seems to indicate a recurring issue.

I wasn't commenting on withheld evidence. As for what you put forward now, it needs some framework. How many centuries and regions are represented by how many quotes? Proving rampant pederast will take quite a bit of work on your part.
"Love ... is an abyss of illumination, a mountain of fire ... . It is the condition of angels, the progress of eternity" (Climacus).

Quote from: Seekingtrue
Yes we who are far from sainthood we can recognize a living saint and I'm talking from personal experience.Yes they are gentle soo gentle it can not be described it is like gentleness and humility in one and also they have this light this energy it's beyond words...and when you are near them you feel ecstatic and very happy

Offline Iconodule

  • Hoplitarches
  • *************
  • Posts: 15,044
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Patriarchate of Johnstown
Re: Important Differences Between Orthodox and Catholic Eucharistic Theology
« Reply #22 on: November 06, 2017, 01:15:45 PM »
Where does "When there's wine and boys around, the monks have no need of the devil to tempt them?" come from? I thought it was Coptic in origin, but I'm not sure.

Saint John the Dwarf says, "He who gorges himself and talks with a boy has already in his thought committed fornication with him." There are other bits like this in the sayings of the desert fathers, which seem to indicate that pederasty was a rampant problem in ancient monasticism.

An apophthegm isn't sufficient evidence of "a rampant problem." It only shows this species of fornication was not unknown.

When several different fathers comment on it, and Abba Isaac says it has led to monasteries being deserted, that seems to indicate a recurring issue.

I wasn't commenting on withheld evidence. As for what you put forward now, it needs some framework. How many centuries and regions are represented by how many quotes? Proving rampant pederast will take quite a bit of work on your part.

I'm not here to prove anything. Believe what you like. Those who are familiar with this literature will know what I'm talking about.
Quote
When a time revolts against eternity, the only thing to set against it is genuine eternity itself, and not some other time which has already roused, and not without reason, a violent reaction against itself.
- Berdyaev

If you would like a private forum for non-polemical topics, comment here.

Offline Porter ODoran

  • St. John the Beloved, pray for me
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 12,135
  • Monahos.net: "Lawful Evil"; OC.net: "Chaotic Evil"
  • Faith: Eastern Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: GOAA
Re: Important Differences Between Orthodox and Catholic Eucharistic Theology
« Reply #23 on: November 06, 2017, 01:17:00 PM »
Where does "When there's wine and boys around, the monks have no need of the devil to tempt them?" come from? I thought it was Coptic in origin, but I'm not sure.

Saint John the Dwarf says, "He who gorges himself and talks with a boy has already in his thought committed fornication with him." There are other bits like this in the sayings of the desert fathers, which seem to indicate that pederasty was a rampant problem in ancient monasticism.

An apophthegm isn't sufficient evidence of "a rampant problem." It only shows this species of fornication was not unknown.

When several different fathers comment on it, and Abba Isaac says it has led to monasteries being deserted, that seems to indicate a recurring issue.

I wasn't commenting on withheld evidence. As for what you put forward now, it needs some framework. How many centuries and regions are represented by how many quotes? Proving rampant pederast will take quite a bit of work on your part.

I'm not here to prove anything. Believe what you like. Those who are familiar with this literature will know what I'm talking about.

Vague appeals to vague authorities can't support a claim of rampant pederasty.
"Love ... is an abyss of illumination, a mountain of fire ... . It is the condition of angels, the progress of eternity" (Climacus).

Quote from: Seekingtrue
Yes we who are far from sainthood we can recognize a living saint and I'm talking from personal experience.Yes they are gentle soo gentle it can not be described it is like gentleness and humility in one and also they have this light this energy it's beyond words...and when you are near them you feel ecstatic and very happy

Offline Xavier

  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 621
  • Immaculate Heart of Mary, Pray for US!
  • Faith: Catholic Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Apostolic Throne of St. Peter's
Re: Important Differences Between Orthodox and Catholic Eucharistic Theology
« Reply #24 on: November 25, 2017, 12:48:15 PM »
Almighty God was so pleased with what St. Thomas Aquinas' formulation of the doctrine of transubstantiation that He put His seal upon his work on the subject in the sight of his contemporaries. And though some Orthodox dismiss him today, St. Thomas was commonly cited in Byzantine seminaries for a long time.

I would place the Confession of Dositheus' in the Synod of Jerusalem/Bethlehem, 1672, second only to the dogmatic precision of Trent in describing Eucharistic theology against Protestant errors. Let the reader judge for himself whether this substantially deviates from Catholic theology or not. All of it is patristic, some of it clearly specific to eastern thought; while much of it is clearly Thomistic, including its precise use of substance and accident.

http://www.crivoice.org/creeddositheus.html

Quote
"But [he is present] truly and really, so that after the consecration of the bread and of the wine, the bread is transmuted, transubstantiated, converted and transformed into the true Body Itself of the Lord, Which was born in Bethlehem of the ever-Virgin, was baptized in the Jordan, suffered, was buried, rose again, was received up, sits at the right hand of the God and Father, and is to come again in the clouds of Heaven; and the wine is converted and transubstantiated into the true Blood Itself of the Lord, Which as He hung upon the Cross, was poured out for the life of the world. {John 6:51}

Further [we believe] that after the consecration of the bread and of the wine, there no longer remains the substance of the bread and of the wine, but the Body Itself and the Blood of the Lord, under the species and form of bread and wine; that is to say, under the accidents of the bread.

Further, that the all-pure Body Itself, and Blood of the Lord is imparted, and enters into the mouths and stomachs of the communicants, whether pious or impious. Nevertheless, they convey to the pious and worthy remission of sins and life eternal; but to the impious and unworthy involve condemnation and eternal punishment.

Further, that the Body and Blood of the Lord are severed and divided by the hands and teeth, though in accident only, that is, in the accidents of the bread and of the wine, under which they are visible and tangible, we do acknowledge; but in themselves to remain entirely unsevered and undivided. Wherefore the Catholic Church also says: “Broken and distributed is He That is broken, yet not severed; Which is ever eaten, yet never consumed, but sanctifying those that partake,” that is worthily.

Further, that in every part, or the smallest division of the transmuted bread and wine there is not a part of the Body and Blood of the Lord — for to say so were blasphemous and wicked — but the entire whole Lord Christ substantially, that is, with His Soul and Divinity, or perfect God and perfect man."
"My daughter, look at My Heart surrounded with thorns with which ungrateful men pierce it at every moment by their blasphemies and ingratitude. You, at least, try to console Me, and say that I promise to assist at the hour of death, with all the graces necessary for salvation, all those who, on the first Saturday of five consecutive months go to confession and receive Holy Communion, recite five decades of the Rosary and keep Me company for a quarter of an hour" - The Theotokos to Sr. Lucia.

Offline Porter ODoran

  • St. John the Beloved, pray for me
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 12,135
  • Monahos.net: "Lawful Evil"; OC.net: "Chaotic Evil"
  • Faith: Eastern Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: GOAA
Re: Important Differences Between Orthodox and Catholic Eucharistic Theology
« Reply #25 on: November 25, 2017, 02:57:22 PM »
Almighty God was so pleased with what St. Thomas Aquinas' formulation of the doctrine of transubstantiation that He put His seal upon his work on the subject in the sight of his contemporaries. And though some Orthodox dismiss him today, St. Thomas was commonly cited in Byzantine seminaries for a long time.

One of these claims is very unlike the other.
"Love ... is an abyss of illumination, a mountain of fire ... . It is the condition of angels, the progress of eternity" (Climacus).

Quote from: Seekingtrue
Yes we who are far from sainthood we can recognize a living saint and I'm talking from personal experience.Yes they are gentle soo gentle it can not be described it is like gentleness and humility in one and also they have this light this energy it's beyond words...and when you are near them you feel ecstatic and very happy

Offline Sharbel

  • Glory to God in all things!
  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,386
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Greek
Re: Important Differences Between Orthodox and Catholic Eucharistic Theology
« Reply #26 on: November 26, 2017, 02:25:08 AM »
Almighty God was so pleased with what St. Thomas Aquinas' formulation of the doctrine of transubstantiation that He put His seal upon his work on the subject in the sight of his contemporaries.
St. Thomas himself, after an ecstasy while celebrating Mass, deemed everything that he wrote straw and left his most notorious work, the Summa Theologica, incomplete.
« Last Edit: November 26, 2017, 02:25:41 AM by Sharbel »
Sanctus Deus
ܩܕܝܫܐ ܐܢ̱ܬ ܠܐ ܡܝܘܬܐ
Άγιος ο Θεός

Offline Porter ODoran

  • St. John the Beloved, pray for me
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 12,135
  • Monahos.net: "Lawful Evil"; OC.net: "Chaotic Evil"
  • Faith: Eastern Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: GOAA
Re: Important Differences Between Orthodox and Catholic Eucharistic Theology
« Reply #27 on: November 26, 2017, 04:42:18 PM »
Almighty God was so pleased with what St. Thomas Aquinas' formulation of the doctrine of transubstantiation that He put His seal upon his work on the subject in the sight of his contemporaries. And though some Orthodox dismiss him today, St. Thomas was commonly cited in Byzantine seminaries for a long time.

I would place the Confession of Dositheus' in the Synod of Jerusalem/Bethlehem, 1672, second only to the dogmatic precision of Trent in describing Eucharistic theology against Protestant errors. Let the reader judge for himself whether this substantially deviates from Catholic theology or not. All of it is patristic, some of it clearly specific to eastern thought; while much of it is clearly Thomistic, including its precise use of substance and accident.

http://www.crivoice.org/creeddositheus.html

Quote
"But [he is present] truly and really, so that after the consecration of the bread and of the wine, the bread is transmuted, transubstantiated, converted and transformed into the true Body Itself of the Lord, Which was born in Bethlehem of the ever-Virgin, was baptized in the Jordan, suffered, was buried, rose again, was received up, sits at the right hand of the God and Father, and is to come again in the clouds of Heaven; and the wine is converted and transubstantiated into the true Blood Itself of the Lord, Which as He hung upon the Cross, was poured out for the life of the world. {John 6:51}

Further [we believe] that after the consecration of the bread and of the wine, there no longer remains the substance of the bread and of the wine, but the Body Itself and the Blood of the Lord, under the species and form of bread and wine; that is to say, under the accidents of the bread.

Further, that the all-pure Body Itself, and Blood of the Lord is imparted, and enters into the mouths and stomachs of the communicants, whether pious or impious. Nevertheless, they convey to the pious and worthy remission of sins and life eternal; but to the impious and unworthy involve condemnation and eternal punishment.

Further, that the Body and Blood of the Lord are severed and divided by the hands and teeth, though in accident only, that is, in the accidents of the bread and of the wine, under which they are visible and tangible, we do acknowledge; but in themselves to remain entirely unsevered and undivided. Wherefore the Catholic Church also says: “Broken and distributed is He That is broken, yet not severed; Which is ever eaten, yet never consumed, but sanctifying those that partake,” that is worthily.

Further, that in every part, or the smallest division of the transmuted bread and wine there is not a part of the Body and Blood of the Lord — for to say so were blasphemous and wicked — but the entire whole Lord Christ substantially, that is, with His Soul and Divinity, or perfect God and perfect man."

You claim that all this show of precision is "patristic" (without, however, deigning to demonstrate the claim) -- but if it were indeed the clear tenor of the Fathers, what need would there have been for a local synod to provide this interpretation? You compare the issue of this 1600s synod to Trent -- and that is apt, since the malicious hubris of the Counter-Reformation in its sweeping effects on the world of that day no doubt had some influence with these bishops of the Levant.
« Last Edit: November 26, 2017, 04:43:01 PM by Porter ODoran »
"Love ... is an abyss of illumination, a mountain of fire ... . It is the condition of angels, the progress of eternity" (Climacus).

Quote from: Seekingtrue
Yes we who are far from sainthood we can recognize a living saint and I'm talking from personal experience.Yes they are gentle soo gentle it can not be described it is like gentleness and humility in one and also they have this light this energy it's beyond words...and when you are near them you feel ecstatic and very happy

Offline Volnutt

  • Dull Sublunary Lover
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 13,656
  • too often left in the payment of false ponchos
  • Faith: Evangelical by default
  • Jurisdiction: Spiritually homeless
Re: Important Differences Between Orthodox and Catholic Eucharistic Theology
« Reply #28 on: November 27, 2017, 07:08:05 AM »
While I generally agree with your point, the idea that a synod would not have been needed if it was the consensus of the Fathers seems to me a dangerous one given that there have been a lot of times in Christian history where a heresy grew so rampant that a synod or even an Ecumenical Council was needed to put a stop to it. In fact, Arianism was or was almost the majority at one point.
Christ my God, set my heart on fire with love in You, that in its flame I may love You with all my heart, with all my mind, and with all my soul and with all my strength, and my neighbor as myself, so that by keeping Your commandments I may glorify You the Giver of every good and perfect gift. Amen.

Offline Porter ODoran

  • St. John the Beloved, pray for me
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 12,135
  • Monahos.net: "Lawful Evil"; OC.net: "Chaotic Evil"
  • Faith: Eastern Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: GOAA
Re: Important Differences Between Orthodox and Catholic Eucharistic Theology
« Reply #29 on: November 27, 2017, 01:29:37 PM »
While I generally agree with your point, the idea that a synod would not have been needed if it was the consensus of the Fathers seems to me a dangerous one given that there have been a lot of times in Christian history where a heresy grew so rampant that a synod or even an Ecumenical Council was needed to put a stop to it. In fact, Arianism was or was almost the majority at one point.

Yes, that's a good point as far as it goes. However, if the hierarchs of the Levant were moved to counter the Reformation (and I don't know what other "heresy grown rampant" they could have been addressing; altho, granted, my knowledge of 1600s Levant is small), then all the more fuel for my suspicion that they were impelled by Trent and less than an independent witness.
"Love ... is an abyss of illumination, a mountain of fire ... . It is the condition of angels, the progress of eternity" (Climacus).

Quote from: Seekingtrue
Yes we who are far from sainthood we can recognize a living saint and I'm talking from personal experience.Yes they are gentle soo gentle it can not be described it is like gentleness and humility in one and also they have this light this energy it's beyond words...and when you are near them you feel ecstatic and very happy

Offline Antonis

  • Μέγα το Θαύμα!
  • Moderator
  • Archon
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,942
Re: Important Differences Between Orthodox and Catholic Eucharistic Theology
« Reply #30 on: November 27, 2017, 01:32:43 PM »
While I generally agree with your point, the idea that a synod would not have been needed if it was the consensus of the Fathers seems to me a dangerous one given that there have been a lot of times in Christian history where a heresy grew so rampant that a synod or even an Ecumenical Council was needed to put a stop to it. In fact, Arianism was or was almost the majority at one point.

Yes, that's a good point as far as it goes. However, if the hierarchs of the Levant were moved to counter the Reformation (and I don't know what other "heresy grown rampant" they could have been addressing; altho, granted, my knowledge of 1600s Levant is small), then all the more fuel for my suspicion that they were impelled by Trent and less than an independent witness.
They were impelled by accusations of Patriarch Cyril Loukaris being a Calvinist, of which there was pretty solid evidence.
« Last Edit: November 27, 2017, 01:33:24 PM by Antonis »
"Verily they that seek Thee, Lord, and keep the canons of Thy Holy Church shall never want any good thing.”
St. John the Merciful

"This is the one from the beginning, who seemed to be new, yet was found to be ancient and always young, being born in the hearts of the saints."
Letter to Diognetus 11.4

Offline Iconodule

  • Hoplitarches
  • *************
  • Posts: 15,044
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Patriarchate of Johnstown
Re: Important Differences Between Orthodox and Catholic Eucharistic Theology
« Reply #31 on: November 27, 2017, 02:04:56 PM »
Who says the Synod of Jerusalem was only about the Levant? It was really a pan-Orthodox synod, with representatives from Russia, Georgia, Moldavia, etc. That the council was answering a real need there can hardly be a doubt. Whether they answered it adequately of course is another question.
Quote
When a time revolts against eternity, the only thing to set against it is genuine eternity itself, and not some other time which has already roused, and not without reason, a violent reaction against itself.
- Berdyaev

If you would like a private forum for non-polemical topics, comment here.

Offline Porter ODoran

  • St. John the Beloved, pray for me
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 12,135
  • Monahos.net: "Lawful Evil"; OC.net: "Chaotic Evil"
  • Faith: Eastern Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: GOAA
Re: Important Differences Between Orthodox and Catholic Eucharistic Theology
« Reply #32 on: November 28, 2017, 01:30:44 PM »
While I generally agree with your point, the idea that a synod would not have been needed if it was the consensus of the Fathers seems to me a dangerous one given that there have been a lot of times in Christian history where a heresy grew so rampant that a synod or even an Ecumenical Council was needed to put a stop to it. In fact, Arianism was or was almost the majority at one point.

Yes, that's a good point as far as it goes. However, if the hierarchs of the Levant were moved to counter the Reformation (and I don't know what other "heresy grown rampant" they could have been addressing; altho, granted, my knowledge of 1600s Levant is small), then all the more fuel for my suspicion that they were impelled by Trent and less than an independent witness.
They were impelled by accusations of Patriarch Cyril Loukaris being a Calvinist, of which there was pretty solid evidence.

Wow. Pretty interesting times.
"Love ... is an abyss of illumination, a mountain of fire ... . It is the condition of angels, the progress of eternity" (Climacus).

Quote from: Seekingtrue
Yes we who are far from sainthood we can recognize a living saint and I'm talking from personal experience.Yes they are gentle soo gentle it can not be described it is like gentleness and humility in one and also they have this light this energy it's beyond words...and when you are near them you feel ecstatic and very happy