OrthodoxChristianity.net
July 30, 2014, 05:23:14 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Reminder: No political discussions in the public fora.  If you do not have access to the private Politics Forum, please send a PM to Fr. George.
 
   Home   Help Calendar Contact Treasury Tags Login Register  
Poll
Question: Should we legislate confidentiality between priest and parishioner?
yes - 5 (41.7%)
no - 6 (50%)
I have no opinion - 1 (8.3%)
Total Voters: 12

Pages: 1   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Penance?  (Read 911 times) Average Rating: 0
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Achilles
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3


« on: June 20, 2005, 05:14:20 PM »

The Mystery of Penance

 

We've heard ofÂÂ  PROTECTING COUNSELLOR-CLIENT CONFIDENTIALITY


What about in our churches? Should there be a legal code of ethics put in place that prevents priests from disclosing confidential information of their parishioners?

In other words should priests be held legally accountable for breaching the confidentiality between themselves and members of their parish?


Quote
The secrecy of the Mystery of Penance is considered an unquestionable rule in the entire Orthodox Church. Theologically, the need to maintain the secrecy of confession comes from the fact that the priest is only a witness before God. One could not expect a sincere and complete confession if the penitent has doubts regarding the practice of confidentiality. Betrayal of the secrecy of confession will lead to canonical punishment of the priest.

Guidelines





Achilles
« Last Edit: June 20, 2005, 05:14:51 PM by Achilles » Logged

NULL
yBeayf
High Elder
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 708

/etc


« Reply #1 on: June 20, 2005, 05:53:27 PM »

Quote
In other words should priests be held legally accountable for breaching the confidentiality between themselves and members of their parish?

Well, what is discussed by the priest and parishioner is already privileged, so it can't be used in court, and a priest who violates the seal of the confessional will likely be defrocked, so I'm not sure what more you think needs to be done. Sanctions for revealing privileged information (such as between doctor/patient, attorney/client, or clergyman/parishioner) are a civil matter, not a criminal one.
« Last Edit: June 20, 2005, 05:54:52 PM by Beayf » Logged
SeanMc
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 203


« Reply #2 on: June 20, 2005, 06:49:16 PM »

The so-called "seal of confession" has not always existed in Christianity. In the earlier days, when members committed more serious sins and wanted to return to the church they had to make a public confession, go through penances in the church, then receive absolution from the bishop.

In the medieval ages, lists were made up for penances. So if you committ X sin you had to do X days of fasting on bread and water, this practice was started in the west and later developed in the whole indulgences thing (so you say a prayer and it had 100 days as an indulgence, so that prayer was equal to 100 days of penance). Of course, this completely negated the ascetic struggle and the Orthodox rightly say.
Logged
Tags:
Pages: 1   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.041 seconds with 32 queries.