Author Topic: Legos for Jesus  (Read 1535 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Asteriktos

  • Hypatos
  • *****************
  • Posts: 35,709
  • the irregardless one
Legos for Jesus
« on: February 23, 2005, 11:33:34 AM »
Ok maybe not...
« Last Edit: February 23, 2005, 11:42:01 AM by Paradosis »
"The bed is too short to stretch out on, the blanket too narrow to wrap around you." (Isa. 28:20)

"For because they wronged the simple, they shall be slain; and an inquisition shall ruin the ungodly." (Prov. 1:32 LXX)

Offline Asteriktos

  • Hypatos
  • *****************
  • Posts: 35,709
  • the irregardless one
Re: Legos for Jesus
« Reply #1 on: February 23, 2005, 12:04:07 PM »
Sorry. I deleted the link when I saw pictures of oral and anal sex with New Testament Scriptural passages as the caption.
"The bed is too short to stretch out on, the blanket too narrow to wrap around you." (Isa. 28:20)

"For because they wronged the simple, they shall be slain; and an inquisition shall ruin the ungodly." (Prov. 1:32 LXX)

Offline ania

  • Life according to Abe Simpson:
  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,097
Re: Legos for Jesus
« Reply #2 on: February 23, 2005, 01:19:19 PM »
Ah, my bad...  deleted it as well
Now where were we? Oh yeah - the important thing was I had an onion on my belt, which was the style at the time. They didn’t have white onions because of the war. The only thing you could get was those big yellow ones...

Offline Asteriktos

  • Hypatos
  • *****************
  • Posts: 35,709
  • the irregardless one
Re: Legos for Jesus
« Reply #3 on: March 29, 2012, 02:33:27 AM »
Quote
Re: Legos for Jesus

The plural of Lego is simply Lego, not legos. You of all people know this.
"The bed is too short to stretch out on, the blanket too narrow to wrap around you." (Isa. 28:20)

"For because they wronged the simple, they shall be slain; and an inquisition shall ruin the ungodly." (Prov. 1:32 LXX)

Offline Ortho_cat

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 5,392
Re: Legos for Jesus
« Reply #4 on: March 29, 2012, 02:41:03 AM »
yikes...i think you could have left it at "Ok, maybe not"  :o  :-X  :police: