Author Topic: Legos for Jesus  (Read 1033 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Asteriktos

  • Protospatharios
  • ****************
  • Posts: 33,360
Legos for Jesus
« on: February 23, 2005, 11:33:34 AM »
Ok maybe not...
« Last Edit: February 23, 2005, 11:42:01 AM by Paradosis »
"I, Lucian, wrote this, I who am skilled in what is old and foolish; For what men think wise is foolish. So then nothing that the mind of man can conceive is certain; What you admire, seems ridiculous to others." - St. Lucian of Antioch

Offline Asteriktos

  • Protospatharios
  • ****************
  • Posts: 33,360
Re: Legos for Jesus
« Reply #1 on: February 23, 2005, 12:04:07 PM »
Sorry. I deleted the link when I saw pictures of oral and anal sex with New Testament Scriptural passages as the caption.
"I, Lucian, wrote this, I who am skilled in what is old and foolish; For what men think wise is foolish. So then nothing that the mind of man can conceive is certain; What you admire, seems ridiculous to others." - St. Lucian of Antioch

Offline ania

  • Life according to Abe Simpson:
  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,097
Re: Legos for Jesus
« Reply #2 on: February 23, 2005, 01:19:19 PM »
Ah, my bad...  deleted it as well
Now where were we? Oh yeah - the important thing was I had an onion on my belt, which was the style at the time. They didn’t have white onions because of the war. The only thing you could get was those big yellow ones...

Offline Asteriktos

  • Protospatharios
  • ****************
  • Posts: 33,360
Re: Legos for Jesus
« Reply #3 on: March 29, 2012, 02:33:27 AM »
Quote
Re: Legos for Jesus

The plural of Lego is simply Lego, not legos. You of all people know this.
"I, Lucian, wrote this, I who am skilled in what is old and foolish; For what men think wise is foolish. So then nothing that the mind of man can conceive is certain; What you admire, seems ridiculous to others." - St. Lucian of Antioch

Offline Ortho_cat

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 5,392
Re: Legos for Jesus
« Reply #4 on: March 29, 2012, 02:41:03 AM »
yikes...i think you could have left it at "Ok, maybe not"  :o  :-X  :police: