Author Topic: To sin or not to sin  (Read 3861 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Matthew79

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 120
  • Faith: Eastern Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: ROCOR
To sin or not to sin
« on: November 04, 2013, 12:17:06 PM »
How much does original sin/ancestral curse affect our ability to sin or not to sin? How many of us, if we are honest with ourselves, can go even 1 day without sinning? Is it even possible?

There are specific thoughts that have inspired this question, but I want to keep it general first and see where things go.

Offline Mor Ephrem

  • The Fourteenth Apostle and Judge of the Interwebs
  • Moderator
  • Protostrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,524
  • The Most Blessed Tikhon: Last Among Equals
    • OrthodoxChristianity.net
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: But my heart belongs to Czech Lands
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #1 on: November 04, 2013, 12:28:55 PM »
If it isn't possible, then even God is a sinner.  While it's certainly possible, it's by no means probable. 
"Do not tempt the Mor thy Mod."

New thread topic.  Rate the sexual attractiveness of members of OC.net on a scale of 1-10.

Mor Ephrem: 11/10

Offline IoanC

  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 2,418
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #2 on: November 04, 2013, 12:30:45 PM »
Sin(fulness) is an illness, an entire state of being. It's not a matter of how many sins, but how deep the condition is. And, only God can restore us to our normal state through His direct intervention or Grace.
« Last Edit: November 04, 2013, 12:31:37 PM by IoanC »

Offline Punch

  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 5,801
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #3 on: November 04, 2013, 12:39:54 PM »
Ah, the Western idea of sin.  No, it is not possible to be without sin since only God is perfect.  Even if you were not to commit any act that violated the Commandments, you would still be sinful because you are not perfect.  Only God is perfect.
I would be happy to agree with you, but then both of us would be wrong.

Offline Hinterlander

  • Site Supporter
  • High Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 546
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #4 on: November 04, 2013, 12:42:47 PM »
Quote
Whoever commits sin also commits lawlessness, and sin is lawlessness. And you know that He was manifested to take away our sins, and in Him there is no sin. Whoever abides in Him does not sin. Whoever sins has neither seen Him nor known Him.

Little children, let no one deceive you. He who practices righteousness is righteous, just as He is righteous. He who sins is of the devil, for the devil has sinned from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that He might destroy the works of the devil. Whoever has been born of God does not sin, for His seed remains in him; and he cannot sin, because he has been born of God.

1 John 3:4-9

It might be more fruitful to focus on how to abide in Him than how NOT to sin.

Offline hecma925

  • Non-clairvoyant
  • Merarches
  • ***********
  • Posts: 9,957
  • Pray for me, a sinner.
    • Blog
  • Faith: Christ Clothes
  • Jurisdiction: Puerto Rican Orthodox Sobor
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #5 on: November 04, 2013, 12:44:50 PM »
Then why does Christ tell us to be perfect like our Father in heaven is perfect?  Was He playing a practical joke?  It has to be possible (I believe it to be, although every difficult for me), otherwise this whole Christianity thing is a farce.
Happy shall he be, that shall take and dash thy little ones against the rock. Alleluia.

Once Christ has filled the Cross, it can never be empty again.

No longer pasting here.

Offline Matthew79

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 120
  • Faith: Eastern Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: ROCOR
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #6 on: November 04, 2013, 12:57:47 PM »
Ah, the Western idea of sin.  No, it is not possible to be without sin since only God is perfect.  Even if you were not to commit any act that violated the Commandments, you would still be sinful because you are not perfect.  Only God is perfect.

If we did not break any of the commandments, did not sin, how would we not be perfect? What is the opposite of sinful? What is the definition of "perfect"?
« Last Edit: November 04, 2013, 12:58:23 PM by Matthew79 »

Offline Matthew79

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 120
  • Faith: Eastern Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: ROCOR
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #7 on: November 04, 2013, 12:59:53 PM »
If it isn't possible, then even God is a sinner.  While it's certainly possible, it's by no means probable. 

God would be the exception, being born without a sin nature, and being God
« Last Edit: November 04, 2013, 01:01:34 PM by Matthew79 »

Offline orthonorm

  • Hoplitarches
  • *************
  • Posts: 17,304
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #8 on: November 04, 2013, 01:04:23 PM »
How much does original sin/ancestral curse affect our ability to sin or not to sin? How many of us, if we are honest with ourselves, can go even 1 day without sinning? Is it even possible?

There are specific thoughts that have inspired this question, but I want to keep it general first and see where things go.

This where the RCs were almost right, it's not that we are ontologically guilty from day one, but rather conditionally so.

You cannot not sin. Period.

No one dies an innocent, not even an aborted fetus.

How the conditional intersects with the ontological is another discussion.

EDIT: This was the first reply. So it doesn't reflect any of the other replies above it. Some happened or something.
If you have PMed me, the mods have taken my ability to PM away. Please see my email if you wish to contact me during my time of trial.

Offline newtoorthodoxy

  • Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 487
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #9 on: November 04, 2013, 01:05:00 PM »
If it isn't possible, then even God is a sinner.  While it's certainly possible, it's by no means probable. 

God wouldn't be included in this equation, since the context is the nature of man, not the nature of God.  Is it possible for man to go even one day without sinning?
Some of my questions might appear patently stupid to those well-versed in Orthodoxy, but I'm brand new, having no background in the faith.  Please grant me a great deal of patience and consideration as I learn the basics.

Offline Hawkeye

  • Διονύσιος ὁ Όμηρίτης
  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 762
  • What does everyone look like?
  • Faith: More Neronov than Avvakum
  • Jurisdiction: Old Rite Chapelist
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #10 on: November 04, 2013, 01:10:23 PM »
If it isn't possible, then even God is a sinner.  While it's certainly possible, it's by no means probable. 

God wouldn't be included in this equation, since the context is the nature of man, not the nature of God.  Is it possible for man to go even one day without sinning?

Be careful how you tread. Did not God become a man?
Quote from: The Life of Ivan Neronov
[Ecclesiastics] conspired against him because they hated his teaching for its zealous emphasis on proper Christian conduct: with great courage he denounced all whom he saw behaving in an ungodly fashion... [As such] he was deprived of his priestly rank, bound in iron chains, and broken down in jails.

Offline orthonorm

  • Hoplitarches
  • *************
  • Posts: 17,304
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #11 on: November 04, 2013, 01:12:58 PM »
Then why does Christ tell us to be perfect like our Father in heaven is perfect?  Was He playing a practical joke?  It has to be possible (I believe it to be, although every difficult for me), otherwise this whole Christianity thing is a farce.

To loosely quote our favorite German: there was only one Christian, and we crucified him.
If you have PMed me, the mods have taken my ability to PM away. Please see my email if you wish to contact me during my time of trial.

Offline IoanC

  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 2,418
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #12 on: November 04, 2013, 01:26:41 PM »
Then why does Christ tell us to be perfect like our Father in heaven is perfect?  Was He playing a practical joke?  It has to be possible (I believe it to be, although every difficult for me), otherwise this whole Christianity thing is a farce.

It is true, man is capable of perfection. However, in the current conditions, he needs to gets rid of the illness of sin and he becomes without sin as well, and then can resemble God through His Grace/Energies.

Offline orthonorm

  • Hoplitarches
  • *************
  • Posts: 17,304
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #13 on: November 04, 2013, 01:34:24 PM »
Ah, the Western idea of sin.  No, it is not possible to be without sin since only God is perfect.  Even if you were not to commit any act that violated the Commandments, you would still be sinful because you are not perfect.  Only God is perfect.

Are you stating the "western idea of sin" cause your argument goes to ontology, which I don't think holds much water. I am not sure what these arguments amount to since you and I would end up with the same conclusion.
« Last Edit: November 04, 2013, 01:34:56 PM by orthonorm »
If you have PMed me, the mods have taken my ability to PM away. Please see my email if you wish to contact me during my time of trial.

Offline Mor Ephrem

  • The Fourteenth Apostle and Judge of the Interwebs
  • Moderator
  • Protostrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,524
  • The Most Blessed Tikhon: Last Among Equals
    • OrthodoxChristianity.net
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: But my heart belongs to Czech Lands
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #14 on: November 04, 2013, 01:43:32 PM »
If it isn't possible, then even God is a sinner.  While it's certainly possible, it's by no means probable. 

God wouldn't be included in this equation, since the context is the nature of man, not the nature of God.  Is it possible for man to go even one day without sinning?

What I had in mind is what hecma925 posted above.  If God wills us not to sin, commands us not to sin, and it's not even remotely possible, then he's a liar or a monster or something. 

Our Lady never sinned. 

So again, it is possible.  But probable?  I can't think of more than two instances in human history.
"Do not tempt the Mor thy Mod."

New thread topic.  Rate the sexual attractiveness of members of OC.net on a scale of 1-10.

Mor Ephrem: 11/10

Offline Mor Ephrem

  • The Fourteenth Apostle and Judge of the Interwebs
  • Moderator
  • Protostrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,524
  • The Most Blessed Tikhon: Last Among Equals
    • OrthodoxChristianity.net
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: But my heart belongs to Czech Lands
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #15 on: November 04, 2013, 01:44:45 PM »
To loosely quote our favorite German: there was only one Christian, and we crucified him.

 :)
"Do not tempt the Mor thy Mod."

New thread topic.  Rate the sexual attractiveness of members of OC.net on a scale of 1-10.

Mor Ephrem: 11/10

Offline IoanC

  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 2,418
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #16 on: November 04, 2013, 01:47:03 PM »
To loosely quote our favorite German: there was only one Christian, and we crucified him.

 :)

Yes, we were all sinners and we crucified the One who wasn't. That would be the end of this world, except He resurrected and now the gates of Heaven are open.

Offline hecma925

  • Non-clairvoyant
  • Merarches
  • ***********
  • Posts: 9,957
  • Pray for me, a sinner.
    • Blog
  • Faith: Christ Clothes
  • Jurisdiction: Puerto Rican Orthodox Sobor
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #17 on: November 04, 2013, 01:57:57 PM »
If it isn't possible, then even God is a sinner.  While it's certainly possible, it's by no means probable. 

God wouldn't be included in this equation, since the context is the nature of man, not the nature of God.  Is it possible for man to go even one day without sinning?

What I had in mind is what hecma925 posted above.  If God wills us not to sin, commands us not to sin, and it's not even remotely possible, then he's a liar or a monster or something. 

Our Lady never sinned. 

So again, it is possible.  But probable?  I can't think of more than two instances in human history.

You could probably tack on Enoch and Elijah who were good enough for God to allow them not to even die.
Happy shall he be, that shall take and dash thy little ones against the rock. Alleluia.

Once Christ has filled the Cross, it can never be empty again.

No longer pasting here.

Offline Mor Ephrem

  • The Fourteenth Apostle and Judge of the Interwebs
  • Moderator
  • Protostrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,524
  • The Most Blessed Tikhon: Last Among Equals
    • OrthodoxChristianity.net
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: But my heart belongs to Czech Lands
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #18 on: November 04, 2013, 02:01:24 PM »
You could probably tack on Enoch and Elijah who were good enough for God to allow them not to even die.

Our Lady died.  Christ died.  So not dying does not necessarily imply sinlessness. 

And I'm unaware of our tradition regarding Enoch and Elijah as having never sinned. 
"Do not tempt the Mor thy Mod."

New thread topic.  Rate the sexual attractiveness of members of OC.net on a scale of 1-10.

Mor Ephrem: 11/10

Offline orthonorm

  • Hoplitarches
  • *************
  • Posts: 17,304
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #19 on: November 04, 2013, 02:04:10 PM »
If it isn't possible, then even God is a sinner.  While it's certainly possible, it's by no means probable. 

God wouldn't be included in this equation, since the context is the nature of man, not the nature of God.  Is it possible for man to go even one day without sinning?

What I had in mind is what hecma925 posted above.  If God wills us not to sin, commands us not to sin, and it's not even remotely possible, then he's a liar or a monster or something. 

Our Lady never sinned. 

So again, it is possible.  But probable?  I can't think of more than two instances in human history.

Mary sinned. This is where the Orthodox show their own lack of understanding of sin. But this has been here about 300 times already?

So Mary isn't sinless. She can't have been. She lived and she died. Due to the causes and conditions greater than her she wasn't perfect.

The real nut to crack when it comes to sin, if you don't wish to go the easy ontological route, is to explain HOW Jesus didn't sin.

Let me know if you know of any good writings on that, cause I've seen none. Too much jibber jabber on the whys (which usually end up to be begging the question writ large), not much on the hows.
If you have PMed me, the mods have taken my ability to PM away. Please see my email if you wish to contact me during my time of trial.

Offline orthonorm

  • Hoplitarches
  • *************
  • Posts: 17,304
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #20 on: November 04, 2013, 02:04:58 PM »
You could probably tack on Enoch and Elijah who were good enough for God to allow them not to even die.

Our Lady died.  Christ died.  So not dying does not necessarily imply sinlessness. 

And I'm unaware of our tradition regarding Enoch and Elijah as having never sinned. 

Not dying isn't the absence of sin, but if you want to St. Paul seriously, the wages of sin IS death. And unless God pays people unjustly . . .
If you have PMed me, the mods have taken my ability to PM away. Please see my email if you wish to contact me during my time of trial.

Offline PoorFoolNicholas

  • Site Supporter
  • OC.net guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,664
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #21 on: November 04, 2013, 02:05:58 PM »
Quote
So again, it is possible.  But probable?  I can't think of more than two instances in human history.

Sounds like a farce to me...

Offline Mor Ephrem

  • The Fourteenth Apostle and Judge of the Interwebs
  • Moderator
  • Protostrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,524
  • The Most Blessed Tikhon: Last Among Equals
    • OrthodoxChristianity.net
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: But my heart belongs to Czech Lands
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #22 on: November 04, 2013, 02:13:29 PM »
Mary sinned. This is where the Orthodox show their own lack of understanding of sin. But this has been here about 300 times already?

If I've understood you correctly, can you recommend one of those 300 or so threads so that I don't waste anyone's time here? 
"Do not tempt the Mor thy Mod."

New thread topic.  Rate the sexual attractiveness of members of OC.net on a scale of 1-10.

Mor Ephrem: 11/10

Offline newtoorthodoxy

  • Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 487
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #23 on: November 04, 2013, 02:18:06 PM »
If it isn't possible, then even God is a sinner.  While it's certainly possible, it's by no means probable. 

God would be the exception, being born without a sin nature, and being God

He was born a man only in the person of Christ.
Some of my questions might appear patently stupid to those well-versed in Orthodoxy, but I'm brand new, having no background in the faith.  Please grant me a great deal of patience and consideration as I learn the basics.

Offline orthonorm

  • Hoplitarches
  • *************
  • Posts: 17,304
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #24 on: November 04, 2013, 02:18:54 PM »
Mary sinned. This is where the Orthodox show their own lack of understanding of sin. But this has been here about 300 times already?

If I've understood you correctly, can you recommend one of those 300 or so threads so that I don't waste anyone's time here? 

Really?

You can see a bit here:

https://www.google.com/#q=site:orthodoxchristianity.net+mary+sinless
If you have PMed me, the mods have taken my ability to PM away. Please see my email if you wish to contact me during my time of trial.

Offline Matthew79

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 120
  • Faith: Eastern Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: ROCOR
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #25 on: November 04, 2013, 02:19:57 PM »
I am reminded of the rich young ruler who was about as perfect as any man can get. Jesus said that in order to be completely perfect he had to sell all he had, give it to the poor, and follow Him- kind of like a vagabond. Then Jesus said, "With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible."

So, the fact that he couldn't give up his riches for the sake of Christ, wouldn't that be idolatry? We could say the young man's understanding of the 10 commandments was a bit shallow. We can't not sin... unless God saves us and empowers us with His Spirit.

Does not our sin nature hold us in bondage, and cause us to sin, until we place our faith in Christ?

If Jesus wasn't born with a sin nature, (which I believe he wasn't) then could he have sinned if he wanted to? I would say no because, being God, He is the standard of what is holy and what is sinful
« Last Edit: November 04, 2013, 02:28:03 PM by Matthew79 »

Offline orthonorm

  • Hoplitarches
  • *************
  • Posts: 17,304
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #26 on: November 04, 2013, 02:20:26 PM »
If it isn't possible, then even God is a sinner.  While it's certainly possible, it's by no means probable. 

God would be the exception, being born without a sin nature, and being God

Weird to see so many see sin as an ontological state who are in EO.

But what do you people mean by nature? I guess some have arguing over this since, as long as we can remember.
If you have PMed me, the mods have taken my ability to PM away. Please see my email if you wish to contact me during my time of trial.

Offline Mor Ephrem

  • The Fourteenth Apostle and Judge of the Interwebs
  • Moderator
  • Protostrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,524
  • The Most Blessed Tikhon: Last Among Equals
    • OrthodoxChristianity.net
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: But my heart belongs to Czech Lands
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #27 on: November 04, 2013, 02:20:36 PM »
Looks like I missed a whole lot of fun between 2006 and 2013!
"Do not tempt the Mor thy Mod."

New thread topic.  Rate the sexual attractiveness of members of OC.net on a scale of 1-10.

Mor Ephrem: 11/10

Offline Matthew79

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 120
  • Faith: Eastern Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: ROCOR
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #28 on: November 04, 2013, 02:24:03 PM »

He was born a man only in the person of Christ.


yeah, sorry, that's what I meant.

Offline Mor Ephrem

  • The Fourteenth Apostle and Judge of the Interwebs
  • Moderator
  • Protostrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,524
  • The Most Blessed Tikhon: Last Among Equals
    • OrthodoxChristianity.net
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: But my heart belongs to Czech Lands
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #29 on: November 04, 2013, 02:24:57 PM »
Weird to see so many see sin as an ontological state who are in EO.

But what do you people mean by nature? I guess some have arguing over this since, as long as we can remember.

It's a good point, I don't think we're all using the same words in the same way.  For my part, I think it would be useful if you explained "sin as an ontological state" or what you mean by that, as well as your (and/or the Orthodox) understanding of sin which, apparently, many of us misunderstand.    
"Do not tempt the Mor thy Mod."

New thread topic.  Rate the sexual attractiveness of members of OC.net on a scale of 1-10.

Mor Ephrem: 11/10

Offline IoanC

  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 2,418
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #30 on: November 04, 2013, 02:31:47 PM »
Sin as an ontological state means that man's nature is corrupted and obscured by sin so that he is not as transparent to God's energies. Man is not functioning as he should, according to his true ontology (in God).
« Last Edit: November 04, 2013, 02:32:55 PM by IoanC »

Offline orthonorm

  • Hoplitarches
  • *************
  • Posts: 17,304
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #31 on: November 04, 2013, 02:43:33 PM »
Weird to see so many see sin as an ontological state who are in EO.

But what do you people mean by nature? I guess some have arguing over this since, as long as we can remember.

It's a good point, I don't think we're all using the same words in the same way.  For my part, I think it would be useful if you explained "sin as an ontological state" or what you mean by that, as well as your (and/or the Orthodox) understanding of sin which, apparently, many of us misunderstand.    

What else could I mean by ontological? That which pertains to being. I can't correct thousands of years of misunderstanding regarding being if folks are suffering under that. I can only point the way. But that is really never much a problem till discussions get rather technical.

Sin? Pretty simple. Being out of communion with God and neighbor. Silly stuff like intent, acts, etc. are not necessary to be in sin. However it is not an ontological state of what call the human person.

Really, I am not as cryptic as those would paint me to be. They just refuse to think for a few seconds after reading what I write.
« Last Edit: November 04, 2013, 02:43:51 PM by orthonorm »
If you have PMed me, the mods have taken my ability to PM away. Please see my email if you wish to contact me during my time of trial.

Offline Punch

  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 5,801
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #32 on: November 04, 2013, 02:45:08 PM »
Ah, the Western idea of sin.  No, it is not possible to be without sin since only God is perfect.  Even if you were not to commit any act that violated the Commandments, you would still be sinful because you are not perfect.  Only God is perfect.

Are you stating the "western idea of sin" cause your argument goes to ontology, which I don't think holds much water. I am not sure what these arguments amount to since you and I would end up with the same conclusion.

What I am saying is that "sin" is not the acts that we commit, it is the fallen state that we are in.  We can never become anything but human.  That is why God came down and became one of us.  We can become, by Grace, what He is by nature. But we can never become "perfect" (without sin) because "in sins did my mother concieve me".  Death is the only way to perfection.
I would be happy to agree with you, but then both of us would be wrong.

Offline orthonorm

  • Hoplitarches
  • *************
  • Posts: 17,304
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #33 on: November 04, 2013, 02:50:17 PM »
Sin as an ontological state means that man's nature is corrupted and obscured by sin so that he is not as transparent to God's energies. Man is not functioning as he should, according to his true ontology (in God).

What is man's nature?

Man certainly isn't a being toward sin. Man's relationship to world might be affected by sin, this clearly isn't necessarily so, if allow yourself to believe Christian teaching.

Being doesn't function, except maybe nowadays when people are so taken with such notions of like the mathematical scientific explanation for everything. Only then does being become so denuded of what is allows to be to be reduced so quickly to something like "functions".
If you have PMed me, the mods have taken my ability to PM away. Please see my email if you wish to contact me during my time of trial.

Offline orthonorm

  • Hoplitarches
  • *************
  • Posts: 17,304
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #34 on: November 04, 2013, 02:53:04 PM »
Ah, the Western idea of sin.  No, it is not possible to be without sin since only God is perfect.  Even if you were not to commit any act that violated the Commandments, you would still be sinful because you are not perfect.  Only God is perfect.

Are you stating the "western idea of sin" cause your argument goes to ontology, which I don't think holds much water. I am not sure what these arguments amount to since you and I would end up with the same conclusion.

What I am saying is that "sin" is not the acts that we commit, it is the fallen state that we are in.  We can never become anything but human.  That is why God came down and became one of us.  We can become, by Grace, what He is by nature. But we can never become "perfect" (without sin) because "in sins did my mother concieve me".  Death is the only way to perfection.

I think state is problematic as it goes quickly back to something being, unless people really can hear the notions of stance within the world.

Like I said, I think we will in conclusion if not on the way there.

Except, I am not sure perfection post mortem is a solid Christian teaching.
If you have PMed me, the mods have taken my ability to PM away. Please see my email if you wish to contact me during my time of trial.

Offline Mor Ephrem

  • The Fourteenth Apostle and Judge of the Interwebs
  • Moderator
  • Protostrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,524
  • The Most Blessed Tikhon: Last Among Equals
    • OrthodoxChristianity.net
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: But my heart belongs to Czech Lands
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #35 on: November 04, 2013, 02:59:37 PM »
What else could I mean by ontological? That which pertains to being. I can't correct thousands of years of misunderstanding regarding being if folks are suffering under that. I can only point the way. But that is really never much a problem till discussions get rather technical.

Sin? Pretty simple. Being out of communion with God and neighbor. Silly stuff like intent, acts, etc. are not necessary to be in sin. However it is not an ontological state of what call the human person.

Really, I am not as cryptic as those would paint me to be. They just refuse to think for a few seconds after reading what I write.

My original interaction with this thread was rather simple, and based on the presumption that "sin" was being used here in terms of acts, words, or thoughts which violate the divine commandments (i.e., "silly stuff").  If I asked for definitions, it's only because I sensed the conversation had moved to another, more serious level, and I needed to catch up if I (and perhaps others) was going to continue in it.    

If sin is not an ontological state of the human person, how is it that "one cannot not sin"?  
"Do not tempt the Mor thy Mod."

New thread topic.  Rate the sexual attractiveness of members of OC.net on a scale of 1-10.

Mor Ephrem: 11/10

Offline orthonorm

  • Hoplitarches
  • *************
  • Posts: 17,304
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #36 on: November 04, 2013, 03:05:52 PM »
What else could I mean by ontological? That which pertains to being. I can't correct thousands of years of misunderstanding regarding being if folks are suffering under that. I can only point the way. But that is really never much a problem till discussions get rather technical.

Sin? Pretty simple. Being out of communion with God and neighbor. Silly stuff like intent, acts, etc. are not necessary to be in sin. However it is not an ontological state of what call the human person.

Really, I am not as cryptic as those would paint me to be. They just refuse to think for a few seconds after reading what I write.

My original interaction with this thread was rather simple, and based on the presumption that "sin" was being used here in terms of acts, words, or thoughts which violate the divine commandments (i.e., "silly stuff").  If I asked for definitions, it's only because I sensed the conversation had moved to another, more serious level, and I needed to catch up if I (and perhaps others) was going to continue in it.    

If sin is not an ontological state of the human person, how is it that "one cannot not sin"?  

As I said, this goes to the interaction between the ontological and conditional (or what I would rather call ontic, but that throws some off too much).

But as I was alluding to above, if we are willing to hear state for what it is, then I am willing to say that sin about be an ontological state in so far as it is manner of relating to the world in which we STAND. Stand here being taken so figuratively as to rerender it literally.

But if we are getting into ontological states of being which are like tinker toy sticks, no thank you.
« Last Edit: November 04, 2013, 03:06:10 PM by orthonorm »
If you have PMed me, the mods have taken my ability to PM away. Please see my email if you wish to contact me during my time of trial.

Offline orthonorm

  • Hoplitarches
  • *************
  • Posts: 17,304
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #37 on: November 04, 2013, 03:12:02 PM »
What else could I mean by ontological? That which pertains to being. I can't correct thousands of years of misunderstanding regarding being if folks are suffering under that. I can only point the way. But that is really never much a problem till discussions get rather technical.

Sin? Pretty simple. Being out of communion with God and neighbor. Silly stuff like intent, acts, etc. are not necessary to be in sin. However it is not an ontological state of what call the human person.

Really, I am not as cryptic as those would paint me to be. They just refuse to think for a few seconds after reading what I write.

My original interaction with this thread was rather simple, and based on the presumption that "sin" was being used here in terms of acts, words, or thoughts which violate the divine commandments (i.e., "silly stuff").  If I asked for definitions, it's only because I sensed the conversation had moved to another, more serious level, and I needed to catch up if I (and perhaps others) was going to continue in it.    

If sin is not an ontological state of the human person, how is it that "one cannot not sin"?  

That is silly stuff, as it what mostly causes people to misunderstand sin. You can do fine and likely better concerning yourself with silly stuff in life, but I don't think the OP was asking whether or not I could go a lifetime without masturbating.

Yes, I could.

And then go through lists of sins and decide whether or not some one could do that.

I would answer no they can't. Since in our world we are all murders in the minimum and perhaps gay in the least. But this stance of ours is a conditional one. We even have an explaination for this condition, it is called the OT.

Basically, people decided to take wrongs stands over and over for silly stuff and things got worse and worse. But some people did take proper stands over and over for silly stuff and someone like Mary was possible, not perfect, not without sin, but capable of being in communion with God in such a deep manner as to survive the most intimate communion with God. The most intimate communion with God we know of for a human person outside that of her son.  
« Last Edit: November 04, 2013, 03:13:13 PM by orthonorm »
If you have PMed me, the mods have taken my ability to PM away. Please see my email if you wish to contact me during my time of trial.

Offline JamesRottnek

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 5,123
  • I am Bibleman; putting 'the' back in the Ukraine
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #38 on: November 04, 2013, 03:38:47 PM »
If it isn't possible, then even God is a sinner.  While it's certainly possible, it's by no means probable. 

God wouldn't be included in this equation, since the context is the nature of man, not the nature of God.  Is it possible for man to go even one day without sinning?

Except that God became Man, and therefore must be included in the equation.
I know a secret about a former Supreme Court Justice.  Can you guess what it is?

The greatest tragedy in the world is when a cigarette ends.

American Spirits - the eco-friendly cigarette.

Preston Robert Kinney (September 8th, 1997-August 14, 2011

Offline JamesRottnek

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 5,123
  • I am Bibleman; putting 'the' back in the Ukraine
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #39 on: November 04, 2013, 03:42:23 PM »
Ah, the Western idea of sin.  No, it is not possible to be without sin since only God is perfect.  Even if you were not to commit any act that violated the Commandments, you would still be sinful because you are not perfect.  Only God is perfect.

Are you stating the "western idea of sin" cause your argument goes to ontology, which I don't think holds much water. I am not sure what these arguments amount to since you and I would end up with the same conclusion.

What I am saying is that "sin" is not the acts that we commit, it is the fallen state that we are in.  We can never become anything but human.  That is why God came down and became one of us.  We can become, by Grace, what He is by nature. But we can never become "perfect" (without sin) because "in sins did my mother concieve me".  Death is the only way to perfection.

St. Athanasius would seem to disagree with you.
I know a secret about a former Supreme Court Justice.  Can you guess what it is?

The greatest tragedy in the world is when a cigarette ends.

American Spirits - the eco-friendly cigarette.

Preston Robert Kinney (September 8th, 1997-August 14, 2011

Offline orthonorm

  • Hoplitarches
  • *************
  • Posts: 17,304
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #40 on: November 04, 2013, 03:49:36 PM »
Mor,

Btw, I think the best theological argument for an ontological understanding of sin is from the Metropolitan John Zizioulas.

But this is in the realm of theology. I am not sure how well it holds up once you remove the theological from it.
If you have PMed me, the mods have taken my ability to PM away. Please see my email if you wish to contact me during my time of trial.

Offline orthonorm

  • Hoplitarches
  • *************
  • Posts: 17,304
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #41 on: November 04, 2013, 03:50:28 PM »
Mor,

You didn't answer my question about any writings on how not why Christ didn't sin.

I am not saying you know the answer, just making I am not missing out on something.
If you have PMed me, the mods have taken my ability to PM away. Please see my email if you wish to contact me during my time of trial.

Offline orthonorm

  • Hoplitarches
  • *************
  • Posts: 17,304
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #42 on: November 04, 2013, 03:52:04 PM »
What else could I mean by ontological? That which pertains to being. I can't correct thousands of years of misunderstanding regarding being if folks are suffering under that. I can only point the way. But that is really never much a problem till discussions get rather technical.

Sin? Pretty simple. Being out of communion with God and neighbor. Silly stuff like intent, acts, etc. are not necessary to be in sin. However it is not an ontological state of what call the human person.

Really, I am not as cryptic as those would paint me to be. They just refuse to think for a few seconds after reading what I write.

My original interaction with this thread was rather simple, and based on the presumption that "sin" was being used here in terms of acts, words, or thoughts which violate the divine commandments (i.e., "silly stuff").  If I asked for definitions, it's only because I sensed the conversation had moved to another, more serious level, and I needed to catch up if I (and perhaps others) was going to continue in it.    

If sin is not an ontological state of the human person, how is it that "one cannot not sin"?  

That is silly stuff, as it what mostly causes people to misunderstand sin. You can do fine and likely better concerning yourself with silly stuff in life, but I don't think the OP was asking whether or not I could go a lifetime without masturbating.

Yes, I could.

And then go through lists of sins and decide whether or not some one could do that.

I would answer no they can't. Since in our world we are all murders in the minimum and perhaps gay in the least. But this stance of ours is a conditional one. We even have an explaination for this condition, it is called the OT.

Basically, people decided to take wrongs stands over and over for silly stuff and things got worse and worse. But some people did take proper stands over and over for silly stuff and someone like Mary was possible, not perfect, not without sin, but capable of being in communion with God in such a deep manner as to survive the most intimate communion with God. The most intimate communion with God we know of for a human person outside that of her son.  

Also Mor, given the literary reference in the subject, I didn't think we were in the realm of the ontological. Being being the question and all.
If you have PMed me, the mods have taken my ability to PM away. Please see my email if you wish to contact me during my time of trial.

Offline Mor Ephrem

  • The Fourteenth Apostle and Judge of the Interwebs
  • Moderator
  • Protostrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,524
  • The Most Blessed Tikhon: Last Among Equals
    • OrthodoxChristianity.net
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: But my heart belongs to Czech Lands
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #43 on: November 04, 2013, 04:23:23 PM »
Btw, I think the best theological argument for an ontological understanding of sin is from the Metropolitan John Zizioulas.

But this is in the realm of theology. I am not sure how well it holds up once you remove the theological from it.

I haven't read much by Met. John other than what was required for class (and then, not all of it), so I can't remember if I've ever read anything by him on this matter.  

Mor,

You didn't answer my question about any writings on how not why Christ didn't sin.

I am not saying you know the answer, just making I am not missing out on something.

I'm sorry, both for not having responded earlier and for not having any book/article recommendations.  Actually, if you or anyone has them (including for what's directly above), I'd love to make note of them and get to them eventually...among theological disciplines, theology proper is not one of my areas of expertise, so I'm much more likely to listen/ask questions than to answer unless I'm fairly confident I know what I'm talking about.

Also Mor, given the literary reference in the subject, I didn't think we were in the realm of the ontological. Being being the question and all.
   

Honestly, I'm not sure how we got into ontology.  I'm only getting to my daily coffee now, Mondays are always fuzzy.  

The OP contains three questions, and I think I focused on the last two and kept things on a simpler level.  Perhaps those who factored in the first question raised the level of discussion and I was left behind.  Until my coffee kicks in, that's what I'm going with.  :P
« Last Edit: November 04, 2013, 04:23:59 PM by Mor Ephrem »
"Do not tempt the Mor thy Mod."

New thread topic.  Rate the sexual attractiveness of members of OC.net on a scale of 1-10.

Mor Ephrem: 11/10

Offline orthonorm

  • Hoplitarches
  • *************
  • Posts: 17,304
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #44 on: November 04, 2013, 04:26:27 PM »
Btw, I think the best theological argument for an ontological understanding of sin is from the Metropolitan John Zizioulas.

But this is in the realm of theology. I am not sure how well it holds up once you remove the theological from it.

I haven't read much by Met. John other than what was required for class (and then, not all of it), so I can't remember if I've ever read anything by him on this matter.  

Mor,

You didn't answer my question about any writings on how not why Christ didn't sin.

I am not saying you know the answer, just making I am not missing out on something.

I'm sorry, both for not having responded earlier and for not having any book/article recommendations.  Actually, if you or anyone has them (including for what's directly above), I'd love to make note of them and get to them eventually...among theological disciplines, theology proper is not one of my areas of expertise, so I'm much more likely to listen/ask questions than to answer unless I'm fairly confident I know what I'm talking about.

Also Mor, given the literary reference in the subject, I didn't think we were in the realm of the ontological. Being being the question and all.
   

Honestly, I'm not sure how we got into ontology.  I'm only getting to my daily coffee now, Mondays are always fuzzy.  

The OP contains three questions, and I think I focused on the last two and kept things on a simpler level.  Perhaps those who factored in the first question raised the level of discussion and I was left behind.  Until my coffee kicks in, that's what I'm going with.  :P

My problem is that I haven't had any caffeine today and my head is killing me. Maybe I should remedy the first and hope it takes care of the second.
If you have PMed me, the mods have taken my ability to PM away. Please see my email if you wish to contact me during my time of trial.

Offline orthonorm

  • Hoplitarches
  • *************
  • Posts: 17,304
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #45 on: November 04, 2013, 04:26:57 PM »
Oh, and who reads OPs?

Weird.
If you have PMed me, the mods have taken my ability to PM away. Please see my email if you wish to contact me during my time of trial.

Offline Mor Ephrem

  • The Fourteenth Apostle and Judge of the Interwebs
  • Moderator
  • Protostrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,524
  • The Most Blessed Tikhon: Last Among Equals
    • OrthodoxChristianity.net
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: But my heart belongs to Czech Lands
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #46 on: November 04, 2013, 04:38:19 PM »
My problem is that I haven't had any caffeine today and my head is killing me. Maybe I should remedy the first and hope it takes care of the second.

There is no maybe.  Do it. 

Oh, and who reads OPs?

Weird.

Since resurfacing here, I've assumed that OP stood for "original post", but does it refer instead to the poster?  Or can it mean either depending on context?
"Do not tempt the Mor thy Mod."

New thread topic.  Rate the sexual attractiveness of members of OC.net on a scale of 1-10.

Mor Ephrem: 11/10

Offline brastaseptim

  • Protopsáltis
  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 952
  • From BBC Louisiana to you, here's the morning news
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #47 on: November 04, 2013, 04:48:17 PM »
On sins... I suppose the closest thing to at least committing the least amount of sins is to fully submit oneself to God's will, because what sin is, in practicality, is doing what is not God's will for us. So I suppose when you get to the point of which you can most approximately be in tune with God's will, so to speak, and stay there, then you're still not perfect, but you're trying as hard as you possibly can.
« Last Edit: November 04, 2013, 04:48:40 PM by brastaseptim »
BBC news certified; The Guardian rejected; OC.net approved.

Offline orthonorm

  • Hoplitarches
  • *************
  • Posts: 17,304
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #48 on: November 04, 2013, 04:59:05 PM »
My problem is that I haven't had any caffeine today and my head is killing me. Maybe I should remedy the first and hope it takes care of the second.

There is no maybe.  Do it. 

Oh, and who reads OPs?

Weird.

Since resurfacing here, I've assumed that OP stood for "original post", but does it refer instead to the poster?  Or can it mean either depending on context?

Either. I am just surprised that anyone reads beyond the subject.
If you have PMed me, the mods have taken my ability to PM away. Please see my email if you wish to contact me during my time of trial.

Offline orthonorm

  • Hoplitarches
  • *************
  • Posts: 17,304
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #49 on: November 04, 2013, 05:00:43 PM »
On sins... I suppose the closest thing to at least committing the least amount of sins is to fully submit oneself to God's will, because what sin is, in practicality, is doing what is not God's will for us. So I suppose when you get to the point of which you can most approximately be in tune with God's will, so to speak, and stay there, then you're still not perfect, but you're trying as hard as you possibly can.

This is the sort of mystic crypticism that evos love.

They are always looking and finding God's will.

Lord have mercy on he who finds God's will and more mercy on those around him if he dare act on it.
If you have PMed me, the mods have taken my ability to PM away. Please see my email if you wish to contact me during my time of trial.

Offline Mor Ephrem

  • The Fourteenth Apostle and Judge of the Interwebs
  • Moderator
  • Protostrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,524
  • The Most Blessed Tikhon: Last Among Equals
    • OrthodoxChristianity.net
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: But my heart belongs to Czech Lands
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #50 on: November 04, 2013, 05:50:51 PM »
Either. I am just surprised that anyone reads beyond the subject.

I always try.  Old world values? 
"Do not tempt the Mor thy Mod."

New thread topic.  Rate the sexual attractiveness of members of OC.net on a scale of 1-10.

Mor Ephrem: 11/10

Offline orthonorm

  • Hoplitarches
  • *************
  • Posts: 17,304
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #51 on: November 04, 2013, 05:55:47 PM »
Either. I am just surprised that anyone reads beyond the subject.

I always try.  Old world values? 

Yes. According to corporate cultural lessons through bad sweets we learned today that Diwali means Festival of Lights which means Chanukah which means Christmas in Jewish thus you all are polite, like small talk, smile and important stuff like that.
If you have PMed me, the mods have taken my ability to PM away. Please see my email if you wish to contact me during my time of trial.

Offline Mor Ephrem

  • The Fourteenth Apostle and Judge of the Interwebs
  • Moderator
  • Protostrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,524
  • The Most Blessed Tikhon: Last Among Equals
    • OrthodoxChristianity.net
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: But my heart belongs to Czech Lands
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #52 on: November 04, 2013, 06:08:33 PM »
Yes. According to corporate cultural lessons through bad sweets we learned today that Diwali means Festival of Lights which means Chanukah which means Christmas in Jewish thus you all are polite, like small talk, smile and important stuff like that.

LOL. 

I've never had decent Indian food in Ohio (where I think you might be from if I've gathered correctly from other posts) unless it was at someone's house, so I imagine the sweets are also sub-par.  But Indians over there, as you say, "are polite, like small talk, smile", etc.  Normally, the situation is reversed: the food is great and the people suck.       
"Do not tempt the Mor thy Mod."

New thread topic.  Rate the sexual attractiveness of members of OC.net on a scale of 1-10.

Mor Ephrem: 11/10

Offline orthonorm

  • Hoplitarches
  • *************
  • Posts: 17,304
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #53 on: November 04, 2013, 06:13:17 PM »
Yes. According to corporate cultural lessons through bad sweets we learned today that Diwali means Festival of Lights which means Chanukah which means Christmas in Jewish thus you all are polite, like small talk, smile and important stuff like that.

LOL. 

I've never had decent Indian food in Ohio (where I think you might be from if I've gathered correctly from other posts) unless it was at someone's house, so I imagine the sweets are also sub-par.  But Indians over there, as you say, "are polite, like small talk, smile", etc.  Normally, the situation is reversed: the food is great and the people suck.       

Actually we have great "Indian" here. Nearly everyone remarks on it who visits. It more towards midwestern sensibilities of course.

Indian desserts are garbage though. I had a lot of Indian guys when I was taking some coursework in engineering who shared their mother's cooking with me. The sweets just never were double chocolate extra cholesterol good.
If you have PMed me, the mods have taken my ability to PM away. Please see my email if you wish to contact me during my time of trial.

Offline Mor Ephrem

  • The Fourteenth Apostle and Judge of the Interwebs
  • Moderator
  • Protostrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,524
  • The Most Blessed Tikhon: Last Among Equals
    • OrthodoxChristianity.net
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: But my heart belongs to Czech Lands
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #54 on: November 04, 2013, 06:23:01 PM »
Indian desserts are garbage though. I had a lot of Indian guys when I was taking some coursework in engineering who shared their mother's cooking with me. The sweets just never were double chocolate extra cholesterol good.

Fair enough: the underlying "philosophy", for lack of a better word, of Indian desserts is different from Western dessert.  And a lot of it is just butter packaged inferiorly.  That said, I would disagree that Indian dessert is garbage.  When it's good, it's great, and when it's bad, it's gross.  Western desserts are almost always at least tolerable. 
"Do not tempt the Mor thy Mod."

New thread topic.  Rate the sexual attractiveness of members of OC.net on a scale of 1-10.

Mor Ephrem: 11/10

Offline Shanghaiski

  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 7,978
  • Holy Trinity Church of Gergeti, Georgia
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #55 on: November 04, 2013, 10:16:04 PM »
Can one choose not to sin? I don't know. But I do know that one can choose to repent. And that is far more important.
Quote from: GabrieltheCelt
If you spend long enough on this forum, you'll come away with all sorts of weird, untrue ideas of Orthodox Christianity.
Quote from: orthonorm
I would suggest most persons in general avoid any question beginning with why.

Offline brastaseptim

  • Protopsáltis
  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 952
  • From BBC Louisiana to you, here's the morning news
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #56 on: November 04, 2013, 10:18:02 PM »
Can one choose not to sin? I don't know. But I do know that one can choose to repent. And that is far more important.

I'm reasonably sure one can choose not to sin, at least deliberate sin, anyway.
BBC news certified; The Guardian rejected; OC.net approved.

Offline Shanghaiski

  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 7,978
  • Holy Trinity Church of Gergeti, Georgia
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #57 on: November 04, 2013, 10:22:54 PM »
Can one choose not to sin? I don't know. But I do know that one can choose to repent. And that is far more important.

I'm reasonably sure one can choose not to sin, at least deliberate sin, anyway.

I guess. But there are sins we commit about which we are not even aware at the time.
Quote from: GabrieltheCelt
If you spend long enough on this forum, you'll come away with all sorts of weird, untrue ideas of Orthodox Christianity.
Quote from: orthonorm
I would suggest most persons in general avoid any question beginning with why.

Offline brastaseptim

  • Protopsáltis
  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 952
  • From BBC Louisiana to you, here's the morning news
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #58 on: November 04, 2013, 10:25:36 PM »
Can one choose not to sin? I don't know. But I do know that one can choose to repent. And that is far more important.

I'm reasonably sure one can choose not to sin, at least deliberate sin, anyway.

I guess. But there are sins we commit about which we are not even aware at the time.

Which is why I say deliberate, meaning knowing it is and doing it anyway.
BBC news certified; The Guardian rejected; OC.net approved.

Offline Shanghaiski

  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 7,978
  • Holy Trinity Church of Gergeti, Georgia
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #59 on: November 04, 2013, 10:30:13 PM »
Can one choose not to sin? I don't know. But I do know that one can choose to repent. And that is far more important.

I'm reasonably sure one can choose not to sin, at least deliberate sin, anyway.

I guess. But there are sins we commit about which we are not even aware at the time.

Which is why I say deliberate, meaning knowing it is and doing it anyway.

Yet I doubt even the saints would admit to having a spotless record there.
Quote from: GabrieltheCelt
If you spend long enough on this forum, you'll come away with all sorts of weird, untrue ideas of Orthodox Christianity.
Quote from: orthonorm
I would suggest most persons in general avoid any question beginning with why.

Offline brastaseptim

  • Protopsáltis
  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 952
  • From BBC Louisiana to you, here's the morning news
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #60 on: November 04, 2013, 10:32:03 PM »
Can one choose not to sin? I don't know. But I do know that one can choose to repent. And that is far more important.

I'm reasonably sure one can choose not to sin, at least deliberate sin, anyway.

I guess. But there are sins we commit about which we are not even aware at the time.

Which is why I say deliberate, meaning knowing it is and doing it anyway.

Yet I doubt even the saints would admit to having a spotless record there.

The only saint who likely has is the Theotokos, and we have a considerable lack of her testimony.
BBC news certified; The Guardian rejected; OC.net approved.

Offline Garuda

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 99
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #61 on: November 05, 2013, 01:46:00 AM »
It's not about potency, but ignorance. I think Augustine was right and so was orthonorm, the sin is being born into a fallen world and being ignorant of the entire will of God. We will continue to be "sinners" until we become saints. Well some of you will burn in hell forever, but that is another story.

Offline IoanC

  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 2,418
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #62 on: November 05, 2013, 01:51:34 AM »
You can only choose to sin and not sin, but you don't have any ability either way without God either allowing you to sin or enabling you to repent through His Grace. That's why sin is an illness that God must heal and virtue is only possible through Him.

Offline Mor Ephrem

  • The Fourteenth Apostle and Judge of the Interwebs
  • Moderator
  • Protostrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,524
  • The Most Blessed Tikhon: Last Among Equals
    • OrthodoxChristianity.net
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: But my heart belongs to Czech Lands
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #63 on: November 05, 2013, 10:47:54 AM »
We will continue to be "sinners" until we become saints. Well some of you will burn in hell forever, but that is another story.

See you there!
"Do not tempt the Mor thy Mod."

New thread topic.  Rate the sexual attractiveness of members of OC.net on a scale of 1-10.

Mor Ephrem: 11/10

Offline Mor Ephrem

  • The Fourteenth Apostle and Judge of the Interwebs
  • Moderator
  • Protostrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,524
  • The Most Blessed Tikhon: Last Among Equals
    • OrthodoxChristianity.net
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: But my heart belongs to Czech Lands
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #64 on: November 05, 2013, 10:52:49 AM »
You can only choose to sin and not sin, but you don't have any ability either way without God either allowing you to sin or enabling you to repent through His Grace. That's why sin is an illness that God must heal and virtue is only possible through Him.

What is the role of man's innate "infinite potential"?
"Do not tempt the Mor thy Mod."

New thread topic.  Rate the sexual attractiveness of members of OC.net on a scale of 1-10.

Mor Ephrem: 11/10

Offline IoanC

  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 2,418
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #65 on: November 05, 2013, 11:11:07 AM »
You can only choose to sin and not sin, but you don't have any ability either way without God either allowing you to sin or enabling you to repent through His Grace. That's why sin is an illness that God must heal and virtue is only possible through Him.

What is the role of man's innate "infinite potential"?

The infinite potential is in him. It just needs to be activated by God. But until he heals from sin, it is difficult to get to theosis.
« Last Edit: November 05, 2013, 11:11:16 AM by IoanC »

Offline Mor Ephrem

  • The Fourteenth Apostle and Judge of the Interwebs
  • Moderator
  • Protostrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,524
  • The Most Blessed Tikhon: Last Among Equals
    • OrthodoxChristianity.net
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: But my heart belongs to Czech Lands
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #66 on: November 05, 2013, 12:24:35 PM »
The infinite potential is in him. It just needs to be activated by God. But until he heals from sin, it is difficult to get to theosis.

Is there some nuance of language I'm missing?  "You don't have any ability either way", to me, doesn't mean the same thing as "(infinite potential) is in him...it just needs to be activated by God". 
"Do not tempt the Mor thy Mod."

New thread topic.  Rate the sexual attractiveness of members of OC.net on a scale of 1-10.

Mor Ephrem: 11/10

Offline orthonorm

  • Hoplitarches
  • *************
  • Posts: 17,304
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #67 on: November 05, 2013, 12:35:21 PM »
The infinite potential is in him. It just needs to be activated by God. But until he heals from sin, it is difficult to get to theosis.

Is there some nuance of language I'm missing?  "You don't have any ability either way", to me, doesn't mean the same thing as "(infinite potential) is in him...it just needs to be activated by God". 

Again, we see the metaphysics of our age hovering over us. potential, ability, activate, infinite.
If you have PMed me, the mods have taken my ability to PM away. Please see my email if you wish to contact me during my time of trial.

Offline Mor Ephrem

  • The Fourteenth Apostle and Judge of the Interwebs
  • Moderator
  • Protostrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,524
  • The Most Blessed Tikhon: Last Among Equals
    • OrthodoxChristianity.net
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: But my heart belongs to Czech Lands
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #68 on: November 05, 2013, 12:50:27 PM »
Well, lack of coffee is not the issue today...
"Do not tempt the Mor thy Mod."

New thread topic.  Rate the sexual attractiveness of members of OC.net on a scale of 1-10.

Mor Ephrem: 11/10

Offline brastaseptim

  • Protopsáltis
  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 952
  • From BBC Louisiana to you, here's the morning news
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #69 on: November 05, 2013, 04:42:27 PM »
Well, lack of coffee is not the issue today...

Right! Who needs coffee anyway? It's the lack of tea that is our chief concern. I suggest Twining's appoint an inquisition committee to find out! 
BBC news certified; The Guardian rejected; OC.net approved.

Offline Matthew79

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 120
  • Faith: Eastern Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: ROCOR
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #70 on: November 05, 2013, 04:54:52 PM »
What is the difference between sin-less and sin-free? Or is there a difference? A priest told me this is what Mary was. I didn't get it.

Offline brastaseptim

  • Protopsáltis
  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 952
  • From BBC Louisiana to you, here's the morning news
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #71 on: November 05, 2013, 05:05:04 PM »
What is the difference between sin-less and sin-free? Or is there a difference? A priest told me this is what Mary was. I didn't get it.

Sin-less is completely unable to sin, by nature, like Christ as the Incarnate Word. Sin-free, like the Theotokos, is preserved from sin only because of God's blessing, and so full of grace that they cannot fathom disobeying God's will, through no no power of their own. Since sin is to disobey god's will, and Christ is God, this is not physically possible. While the Theotokos was possible, because of being human and a creature of God, she was so full of grace that she did not. At least, that is the Catholic belief.
BBC news certified; The Guardian rejected; OC.net approved.

Offline xOrthodox4Christx

  • Partisan Pro-Chalcedonian Fanatic
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 5,631
  • #FeelTheBern
  • Faith: Eastern Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: OCA
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #72 on: November 05, 2013, 05:09:34 PM »
We will continue to be "sinners" until we become saints. Well some of you will burn in hell forever, but that is another story.

See you there!

I'll be joining you. Maybe we should make a 'secret handshake' to identify each other when we meet together there.  :D
Not everything I type or have typed in the past is reflective of the teaching of the Orthodox Church, or may not reflect my contemporary views on a subject. (5/30/2015)

I am scaling back posting because the crack in my computer screen makes it harder and harder to type.

Offline xOrthodox4Christx

  • Partisan Pro-Chalcedonian Fanatic
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 5,631
  • #FeelTheBern
  • Faith: Eastern Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: OCA
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #73 on: November 05, 2013, 05:11:15 PM »
What is the difference between sin-less and sin-free? Or is there a difference? A priest told me this is what Mary was. I didn't get it.

Sin-less is completely unable to sin, by nature, like Christ as the Incarnate Word. Sin-free, like the Theotokos, is preserved from sin only because of God's blessing, and so full of grace that they cannot fathom disobeying God's will, through no no power of their own. Since sin is to disobey god's will, and Christ is God, this is not physically possible. While the Theotokos was possible, because of being human and a creature of God, she was so full of grace that she did not. At least, that is the Catholic belief.

She was born like any normal human being. She was sanctified through the indwelling of God, just as the Temple of Judaism was sanctified with the indwelling of God.>>Orthodox view
Not everything I type or have typed in the past is reflective of the teaching of the Orthodox Church, or may not reflect my contemporary views on a subject. (5/30/2015)

I am scaling back posting because the crack in my computer screen makes it harder and harder to type.

Offline brastaseptim

  • Protopsáltis
  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 952
  • From BBC Louisiana to you, here's the morning news
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #74 on: November 05, 2013, 05:18:23 PM »
What is the difference between sin-less and sin-free? Or is there a difference? A priest told me this is what Mary was. I didn't get it.

Sin-less is completely unable to sin, by nature, like Christ as the Incarnate Word. Sin-free, like the Theotokos, is preserved from sin only because of God's blessing, and so full of grace that they cannot fathom disobeying God's will, through no no power of their own. Since sin is to disobey god's will, and Christ is God, this is not physically possible. While the Theotokos was possible, because of being human and a creature of God, she was so full of grace that she did not. At least, that is the Catholic belief.

She was born like any normal human being. She was sanctified through the indwelling of God, just as the Temple of Judaism was sanctified with the indwelling of God.>>Orthodox view

Hmm... makes sense. But wait, but the Holy Spirit only got to her at the Annunciation, when she was roughly 14- what about all the years before then?
BBC news certified; The Guardian rejected; OC.net approved.

Offline LizaSymonenko

  • Слава Ісусу Христу!!! Glory to Jesus Christ!!!
  • Global Moderator
  • Toumarches
  • ******
  • Posts: 14,024
    • St.Mary the Protectress Ukrainian Orthodox Cathedral
  • Faith: Eastern Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the U.S.A.
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #75 on: November 05, 2013, 05:24:25 PM »
How much does original sin/ancestral curse affect our ability to sin or not to sin? How many of us, if we are honest with ourselves, can go even 1 day without sinning? Is it even possible?

There are specific thoughts that have inspired this question, but I want to keep it general first and see where things go.

It's a matter of will-power and humility.

Most of us know when we sin, however, the sin usually draws us in and we lack the will power or desire not to give in.

We sin daily if not hourly, if not with actual physical sin, but, with thought or desire.  We judge people the instant we look at them.  We waste time.  We tease and hurt others.  We get angry and insulted easily.

We sin.

But, as Shanghaiski stated we also have the capability to repent.  Problem is, realizing that we are sinning, in order to repent...or better realize the sin, before we commit it.
Conquer evil men by your gentle kindness, and make zealous men wonder at your goodness. Put the lover of legality to shame by your compassion. With the afflicted be afflicted in mind. Love all men, but keep distant from all men.
—St. Isaac of Syria

Offline Matthew79

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 120
  • Faith: Eastern Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: ROCOR
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #76 on: November 05, 2013, 05:25:43 PM »
What is the difference between sin-less and sin-free? Or is there a difference? A priest told me this is what Mary was. I didn't get it.

Sin-less is completely unable to sin, by nature, like Christ as the Incarnate Word. Sin-free, like the Theotokos, is preserved from sin only because of God's blessing, and so full of grace that they cannot fathom disobeying God's will, through no no power of their own. Since sin is to disobey god's will, and Christ is God, this is not physically possible. While the Theotokos was possible, because of being human and a creature of God, she was so full of grace that she did not. At least, that is the Catholic belief.

She was born like any normal human being. She was sanctified through the indwelling of God, just as the Temple of Judaism was sanctified with the indwelling of God.>>Orthodox view

If she was like any normal human being, and most of us pretty much decided it is impossible to go a day without sinning, then wouldn't it be reasonable to think that Mary sinned at some point in her life, even if only once? God saves us through faith in Christ and that is how we are sanctified, but sanctification is a process. No one is made instantly perfect once we begin following Christ, and certainly not before that.

On sainthood- and I think this also relates to the discussion about Mary- Paul often began his letters referring to all who are in Christ as "saints", but we are saints who are still on our journeys while the saints who have passed on have reached their destination. I see no other Biblical differentiation between us and the saints in Heaven.

Offline Punch

  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 5,801
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #77 on: November 05, 2013, 07:40:21 PM »
Except, I am not sure perfection post mortem is a solid Christian teaching.

Why not? If after death we achieve full unity with God, there would be no imperfection. All that is imperfect in us is in the grave.  What is after will never again die.
I would be happy to agree with you, but then both of us would be wrong.

Offline Punch

  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 5,801
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #78 on: November 05, 2013, 07:41:30 PM »
St. Athanasius would seem to disagree with you.

So?  He's dead.
I would be happy to agree with you, but then both of us would be wrong.

Offline Garuda

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 99
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #79 on: November 05, 2013, 09:09:25 PM »
We will continue to be "sinners" until we become saints. Well some of you will burn in hell forever, but that is another story.

See you there!

I guess I could make time once every 1874921722148 years to look down at you from Paradise.

Offline PeterTheAleut

  • The Right Blowhard Peter the Furtive of Yetts O'Muckhart
  • Section Moderator
  • Hypatos
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,079
  • Lord, have mercy on the Christians in Mosul!
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Orthodox Church in America
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #80 on: November 05, 2013, 09:25:59 PM »
What is the difference between sin-less and sin-free? Or is there a difference? A priest told me this is what Mary was. I didn't get it.

Sin-less is completely unable to sin, by nature, like Christ as the Incarnate Word. Sin-free, like the Theotokos, is preserved from sin only because of God's blessing, and so full of grace that they cannot fathom disobeying God's will, through no no power of their own. Since sin is to disobey god's will, and Christ is God, this is not physically possible. While the Theotokos was possible, because of being human and a creature of God, she was so full of grace that she did not. At least, that is the Catholic belief.
Are you correcting someone else's errant statements about what you believe, or are you just here to tell us what Catholics believe?
Not all who wander are lost.

Offline brastaseptim

  • Protopsáltis
  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 952
  • From BBC Louisiana to you, here's the morning news
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #81 on: November 05, 2013, 09:27:42 PM »
What is the difference between sin-less and sin-free? Or is there a difference? A priest told me this is what Mary was. I didn't get it.

Sin-less is completely unable to sin, by nature, like Christ as the Incarnate Word. Sin-free, like the Theotokos, is preserved from sin only because of God's blessing, and so full of grace that they cannot fathom disobeying God's will, through no no power of their own. Since sin is to disobey god's will, and Christ is God, this is not physically possible. While the Theotokos was possible, because of being human and a creature of God, she was so full of grace that she did not. At least, that is the Catholic belief.
Are you correcting someone else's errant statements about what you believe, or are you just here to tell us what Catholics believe?

Correcting someone's statements about what Catholics believe. I know the drill by now.
BBC news certified; The Guardian rejected; OC.net approved.

Offline PeterTheAleut

  • The Right Blowhard Peter the Furtive of Yetts O'Muckhart
  • Section Moderator
  • Hypatos
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,079
  • Lord, have mercy on the Christians in Mosul!
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Orthodox Church in America
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #82 on: November 05, 2013, 09:34:36 PM »
What is the difference between sin-less and sin-free? Or is there a difference? A priest told me this is what Mary was. I didn't get it.

Sin-less is completely unable to sin, by nature, like Christ as the Incarnate Word. Sin-free, like the Theotokos, is preserved from sin only because of God's blessing, and so full of grace that they cannot fathom disobeying God's will, through no no power of their own. Since sin is to disobey god's will, and Christ is God, this is not physically possible. While the Theotokos was possible, because of being human and a creature of God, she was so full of grace that she did not. At least, that is the Catholic belief.
Are you correcting someone else's errant statements about what you believe, or are you just here to tell us what Catholics believe?

Correcting someone's statements about what Catholics believe. I know the drill by now.
Whose errant statements are you correcting?
Not all who wander are lost.

Offline brastaseptim

  • Protopsáltis
  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 952
  • From BBC Louisiana to you, here's the morning news
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #83 on: November 05, 2013, 09:39:10 PM »
What is the difference between sin-less and sin-free? Or is there a difference? A priest told me this is what Mary was. I didn't get it.

Sin-less is completely unable to sin, by nature, like Christ as the Incarnate Word. Sin-free, like the Theotokos, is preserved from sin only because of God's blessing, and so full of grace that they cannot fathom disobeying God's will, through no no power of their own. Since sin is to disobey god's will, and Christ is God, this is not physically possible. While the Theotokos was possible, because of being human and a creature of God, she was so full of grace that she did not. At least, that is the Catholic belief.
Are you correcting someone else's errant statements about what you believe, or are you just here to tell us what Catholics believe?

Correcting someone's statements about what Catholics believe. I know the drill by now.
Whose errant statements are you correcting?

The statement that the Theotokos is, according to Catholic belief, either sinless or sin-free. I was making the distinction between the two principles in doctrine, and making sure he knew that was the Catholic and not the Orthodox doctrine as far as I know, so as to not believe my statements to be Orthodox doctrine and somehow accidentally fall into some Latin heresy.
BBC news certified; The Guardian rejected; OC.net approved.

Offline Matthew79

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 120
  • Faith: Eastern Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: ROCOR
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #84 on: November 05, 2013, 10:37:09 PM »
What is the difference between sin-less and sin-free? Or is there a difference? A priest told me this is what Mary was. I didn't get it.

Sin-less is completely unable to sin, by nature, like Christ as the Incarnate Word. Sin-free, like the Theotokos, is preserved from sin only because of God's blessing, and so full of grace that they cannot fathom disobeying God's will, through no no power of their own. Since sin is to disobey god's will, and Christ is God, this is not physically possible. While the Theotokos was possible, because of being human and a creature of God, she was so full of grace that she did not. At least, that is the Catholic belief.
Are you correcting someone else's errant statements about what you believe, or are you just here to tell us what Catholics believe?

Correcting someone's statements about what Catholics believe. I know the drill by now.
Whose errant statements are you correcting?

The statement that the Theotokos is, according to Catholic belief, either sinless or sin-free. I was making the distinction between the two principles in doctrine, and making sure he knew that was the Catholic and not the Orthodox doctrine as far as I know, so as to not believe my statements to be Orthodox doctrine and somehow accidentally fall into some Latin heresy.

So are you saying that the Orthodox priest that said she was sin-free, but not sin-less was not a correct Orthodox position?

Offline brastaseptim

  • Protopsáltis
  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 952
  • From BBC Louisiana to you, here's the morning news
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #85 on: November 05, 2013, 10:40:45 PM »
What is the difference between sin-less and sin-free? Or is there a difference? A priest told me this is what Mary was. I didn't get it.

Sin-less is completely unable to sin, by nature, like Christ as the Incarnate Word. Sin-free, like the Theotokos, is preserved from sin only because of God's blessing, and so full of grace that they cannot fathom disobeying God's will, through no no power of their own. Since sin is to disobey god's will, and Christ is God, this is not physically possible. While the Theotokos was possible, because of being human and a creature of God, she was so full of grace that she did not. At least, that is the Catholic belief.
Are you correcting someone else's errant statements about what you believe, or are you just here to tell us what Catholics believe?

Correcting someone's statements about what Catholics believe. I know the drill by now.
Whose errant statements are you correcting?

The statement that the Theotokos is, according to Catholic belief, either sinless or sin-free. I was making the distinction between the two principles in doctrine, and making sure he knew that was the Catholic and not the Orthodox doctrine as far as I know, so as to not believe my statements to be Orthodox doctrine and somehow accidentally fall into some Latin heresy.

So are you saying that the Orthodox priest that said she was sin-free, but not sin-less was not a correct Orthodox position?

I wasn't sure if it was an Orthodox priest who said it, so...
BBC news certified; The Guardian rejected; OC.net approved.

Offline JamesRottnek

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 5,123
  • I am Bibleman; putting 'the' back in the Ukraine
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #86 on: November 05, 2013, 10:50:31 PM »
What is the difference between sin-less and sin-free? Or is there a difference? A priest told me this is what Mary was. I didn't get it.

Sin-less is completely unable to sin, by nature, like Christ as the Incarnate Word.

It Christ's nature was such that he was unable to sin, He was never tempted, which is in direct contradiction to both the Gospel and St. Paul
I know a secret about a former Supreme Court Justice.  Can you guess what it is?

The greatest tragedy in the world is when a cigarette ends.

American Spirits - the eco-friendly cigarette.

Preston Robert Kinney (September 8th, 1997-August 14, 2011

Offline JamesRottnek

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 5,123
  • I am Bibleman; putting 'the' back in the Ukraine
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #87 on: November 05, 2013, 10:52:16 PM »
St. Athanasius would seem to disagree with you.

So?  He's dead.

Only to sin. 
I know a secret about a former Supreme Court Justice.  Can you guess what it is?

The greatest tragedy in the world is when a cigarette ends.

American Spirits - the eco-friendly cigarette.

Preston Robert Kinney (September 8th, 1997-August 14, 2011

Offline IoanC

  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 2,418
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #88 on: November 06, 2013, 02:29:44 AM »
The infinite potential is in him. It just needs to be activated by God. But until he heals from sin, it is difficult to get to theosis.

Is there some nuance of language I'm missing?  "You don't have any ability either way", to me, doesn't mean the same thing as "(infinite potential) is in him...it just needs to be activated by God".  

Man is a perfect resonance chamber for the divine. His constitution is a true divine masterpiece. However, if the divine does not flow through man, he just remains an empty resonance chamber (perfect as it may be). So, it is improper to say that it is not man's own capacity to be an infinite image of God, just as it is improper to say that man has the infinite (God) within himself, that he can achieve the likeness of God by himself.
« Last Edit: November 06, 2013, 02:31:03 AM by IoanC »

Offline Matthew79

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 120
  • Faith: Eastern Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: ROCOR
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #89 on: November 06, 2013, 08:51:22 AM »
What is the difference between sin-less and sin-free? Or is there a difference? A priest told me this is what Mary was. I didn't get it.

Sin-less is completely unable to sin, by nature, like Christ as the Incarnate Word. Sin-free, like the Theotokos, is preserved from sin only because of God's blessing, and so full of grace that they cannot fathom disobeying God's will, through no no power of their own. Since sin is to disobey god's will, and Christ is God, this is not physically possible. While the Theotokos was possible, because of being human and a creature of God, she was so full of grace that she did not. At least, that is the Catholic belief.
Are you correcting someone else's errant statements about what you believe, or are you just here to tell us what Catholics believe?

Correcting someone's statements about what Catholics believe. I know the drill by now.
Whose errant statements are you correcting?

The statement that the Theotokos is, according to Catholic belief, either sinless or sin-free. I was making the distinction between the two principles in doctrine, and making sure he knew that was the Catholic and not the Orthodox doctrine as far as I know, so as to not believe my statements to be Orthodox doctrine and somehow accidentally fall into some Latin heresy.

So are you saying that the Orthodox priest that said she was sin-free, but not sin-less was not a correct Orthodox position?

I wasn't sure if it was an Orthodox priest who said it, so...

Okay, so, forgive my density here- I just want it to be absolutely clear- you're saying Mary was neither sin-free nor sin-less? She was a sinner in as much need of salvation as the rest of us? 

Offline Shanghaiski

  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 7,978
  • Holy Trinity Church of Gergeti, Georgia
Re: To sin or not to sin
« Reply #90 on: November 24, 2013, 01:48:31 AM »
No one can save himself. We all need a Savior. That is, however, a different question than whether Our Lady was "a sinner like the rest of us." She was a human being, mortal, and fallible, but besides sharing our humanity and being subject to the same constraints, she wasn't really "like the rest of us."
« Last Edit: November 24, 2013, 01:48:46 AM by Shanghaiski »
Quote from: GabrieltheCelt
If you spend long enough on this forum, you'll come away with all sorts of weird, untrue ideas of Orthodox Christianity.
Quote from: orthonorm
I would suggest most persons in general avoid any question beginning with why.