OrthodoxChristianity.net
April 24, 2014, 01:16:20 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: The Rules page has been updated.  Please familiarize yourself with its contents!
 
   Home   Help Calendar Contact Treasury Tags Login Register  
Pages: 1   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: USA Today - Pope puts Catholic rebirth at risk: Column  (Read 542 times) Average Rating: 0
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Mor Ephrem
"Mor is right, you are wrong." - Carl Kraeff
Section Moderator
Toumarches
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 12,125


I'm back, Mom...miss Me?


WWW
« on: April 22, 2014, 03:36:33 PM »

Quote
Plans to canonize abuse-tainted pontiffs reveal disconnect.

This Sunday, one week after Easter, Pope Francis is scheduled to canonize two of his predecessors, John Paul II and John XXIII. Few moves could so quickly undo his popular efforts to make the Roman Catholic Church more sensitive to the values of modern churchgoers.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2014/04/21/pope-saint-johnpaulii-easter-sex-abuse-column/7980347/

I found the following claim interesting:

Quote
Many faithful plead that being the leader of an institution with 1.2 billion souls is a big job, and that popes can't know everything. The excuse isn't legitimate.

The Catholic bureaucratic structure that links parishes and dioceses to the central-governing Roman Curia is one of the world's most effective communications networks — so much so that it provided invaluable on-the-ground intelligence from behind the Iron Curtain to the Reagan administration during the Cold War. What's playing in Peoria, or rather, who is playing around in Peoria, really does make its way to St. Peter's Basilica.


Logged

"Best of all, Mor Ephrem won't trap you into having his baby." - dzheremi

"Mor Ephrim will not be allowed in(to the getes of heaven) because God doesnt know him." - Cackles

"You are consistently one of the cruelest posters on this forum." - William
Maria
Orthodox Christian
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Posts: 6,374


O most Holy Theotokos, save us.


« Reply #1 on: April 22, 2014, 04:17:21 PM »

Lord have mercy.
Logged

Glory to Jesus Christ!
Glory to Him forever!
Nephi
Section Moderator
Archon
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Auntie Oak
Posts: 3,004



« Reply #2 on: April 22, 2014, 04:30:17 PM »

I find the claim that the Pope should micromanage everything and in fact knows everything happening everywhere to be stretching a bit.

Interestingly, many FSSP-type traditionalists oppose their canonizations, but of course for very different reasons.
Logged

Liberalochian: Ecumenism Lite™
Maria
Orthodox Christian
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Posts: 6,374


O most Holy Theotokos, save us.


« Reply #3 on: April 22, 2014, 04:40:24 PM »

I find the claim that the Pope should micromanage everything and in fact knows everything happening everywhere to be stretching a bit.

Interestingly, many FSSP-type traditionalists oppose their canonizations, but of course for very different reasons.

The Pope wants to spread Roman Catholicism by declaring more 'saints' especially the recent Popes as proofs that Papal Infallibility and Papal Supremacy are credible dogmas. As an attempt to cover the recent sexual abuse charges and to validate the New Novus Ordo, it is imperative that people realize that the Roman Catholic church and her Popes are Holy. What better way to accomplish this feat than to canonize these recent Popes?
Logged

Glory to Jesus Christ!
Glory to Him forever!
Cognomen
Site Supporter
OC.net guru
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Catholic
Jurisdiction: Phyletism Rules, OK
Posts: 1,949


Ungrateful Biped


« Reply #4 on: April 22, 2014, 04:54:28 PM »

Don't shelterers of child molesters from earthly justice need patron saints too?

Sorry, God will judge them, not me.  But I sense near zero credibility in certain actions of the RCC.
Logged

North American Eastern Orthodox Parish Council Delegate for the Canonization of Saints Twin Towers and Pentagon, as well as the Propagation of the Doctrine of the Assumption of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 (NAEOPCDCSTTPPDAMAFM®).
Asteriktos
Protostrator
***************
Online Online

Faith: Like an arrow to the knee
Posts: 27,325


Happy 450th birthday, Mr. Shakespeare!


« Reply #5 on: April 22, 2014, 09:15:10 PM »

I thought everyone liked John Paul the 2? Huh
Logged
Nephi
Section Moderator
Archon
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Auntie Oak
Posts: 3,004



« Reply #6 on: April 22, 2014, 09:51:05 PM »

I thought everyone liked John Paul the 2? Huh

Traditionalists don't because  they consider him incredibly scandalous with his less-than-great kind of ecumenical overtures, and his more progressive policies and beliefs. They think canonizing him will solidify these sentiments within the Church (e.g. "this recent pope-saint prayed with non-Christians, kissed the Quran etc. so it has to be a good thing!").

And apparently the folks in the OP don't either.
Logged

Liberalochian: Ecumenism Lite™
SolEX01
Merarches
***********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America, Holy Metropolis of New Jersey
Posts: 10,245


WWW
« Reply #7 on: April 22, 2014, 10:07:25 PM »

I wonder if RC hymnographers have the following troparia/kontakia for the canonized Popes.

For Blessed Pope John Paul II

O destroyer of Communism

For Blessed Pope John XXIII

O creator of clown masses
Logged
Mor Ephrem
"Mor is right, you are wrong." - Carl Kraeff
Section Moderator
Toumarches
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 12,125


I'm back, Mom...miss Me?


WWW
« Reply #8 on: April 22, 2014, 10:08:24 PM »

For Blessed Pope John XXIII

O creator of clown masses

You don't know much about Good Pope John, do you?  Tongue
Logged

"Best of all, Mor Ephrem won't trap you into having his baby." - dzheremi

"Mor Ephrim will not be allowed in(to the getes of heaven) because God doesnt know him." - Cackles

"You are consistently one of the cruelest posters on this forum." - William
SolEX01
Merarches
***********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America, Holy Metropolis of New Jersey
Posts: 10,245


WWW
« Reply #9 on: April 22, 2014, 10:12:14 PM »

For Blessed Pope John XXIII

O creator of clown masses

You don't know much about Good Pope John, do you?  Tongue

He died while Vatican II was in session.
Logged
Mor Ephrem
"Mor is right, you are wrong." - Carl Kraeff
Section Moderator
Toumarches
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 12,125


I'm back, Mom...miss Me?


WWW
« Reply #10 on: April 22, 2014, 10:22:46 PM »

You don't know much about Good Pope John, do you?  Tongue

He died while Vatican II was in session.

Here.
Logged

"Best of all, Mor Ephrem won't trap you into having his baby." - dzheremi

"Mor Ephrim will not be allowed in(to the getes of heaven) because God doesnt know him." - Cackles

"You are consistently one of the cruelest posters on this forum." - William
SolEX01
Merarches
***********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America, Holy Metropolis of New Jersey
Posts: 10,245


WWW
« Reply #11 on: April 22, 2014, 10:51:33 PM »

You don't know much about Good Pope John, do you?  Tongue

He died while Vatican II was in session.

Here.

The site takes a long time to load.   Shocked
Logged
Gebre Menfes Kidus
"SERVANT of The HOLY SPIRIT"
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Ethiopian Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Orthodox Tewahedo / Non-Chalcedonian
Posts: 7,832


"Lord Have Mercy on Me a Sinner!"


WWW
« Reply #12 on: April 22, 2014, 11:38:11 PM »

I really am conflicted about this. There is so much I admire about both of these Popes, but I can't buy the excuse that "the Pope can't know everything." Obviously there is no way for the Pope to micromanage every action of every priest in the world, but he can certainly mete out uncompromising heavy handed actions regarding the cases he does know about. The perception is that these Popes simply did not take the drastic measures that needed to be taken to curtail these horrors. And I have to say that I think the perception is warranted. Therefore, I do believe that Pope Francis is making a mistake with their canonizations.

"Lord have mercy."


Selam
Logged

“Lord, I say too many uncharitable things about people every day. I say them because they make me look clever. Help me to realize how cheap this is. I am stupid, quite as stupid as the people I ridicule. Help me to stop this selfishness, because I love You dear God." ~ FLANNERY O'CONNOR ~
Mor Ephrem
"Mor is right, you are wrong." - Carl Kraeff
Section Moderator
Toumarches
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 12,125


I'm back, Mom...miss Me?


WWW
« Reply #13 on: April 22, 2014, 11:40:06 PM »

The site takes a long time to load.   Shocked

How long is long?  I don't have any significant problems.
Logged

"Best of all, Mor Ephrem won't trap you into having his baby." - dzheremi

"Mor Ephrim will not be allowed in(to the getes of heaven) because God doesnt know him." - Cackles

"You are consistently one of the cruelest posters on this forum." - William
SolEX01
Merarches
***********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America, Holy Metropolis of New Jersey
Posts: 10,245


WWW
« Reply #14 on: April 22, 2014, 11:49:05 PM »

The site takes a long time to load.   Shocked

How long is long?  I don't have any significant problems.

Your internet connection is faster than mine (dial-up).

Also, the article did load and Blessed Pope John XXIII was a traditionalist.  Regardless, he convened Vatican II.
Logged
Mor Ephrem
"Mor is right, you are wrong." - Carl Kraeff
Section Moderator
Toumarches
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 12,125


I'm back, Mom...miss Me?


WWW
« Reply #15 on: April 22, 2014, 11:59:22 PM »

Also, the article did load and Blessed Pope John XXIII was a traditionalist.  Regardless, he convened Vatican II.

Sure, but you called him the "creator of clown Masses", and that's just not the case.  It's like arguing that Jesus committed suicide because he called Judas Iscariot to apostleship. 
Logged

"Best of all, Mor Ephrem won't trap you into having his baby." - dzheremi

"Mor Ephrim will not be allowed in(to the getes of heaven) because God doesnt know him." - Cackles

"You are consistently one of the cruelest posters on this forum." - William
SolEX01
Merarches
***********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America, Holy Metropolis of New Jersey
Posts: 10,245


WWW
« Reply #16 on: Yesterday at 12:03:47 AM »

Also, the article did load and Blessed Pope John XXIII was a traditionalist.  Regardless, he convened Vatican II.

Sure, but you called him the "creator of clown Masses", and that's just not the case.  It's like arguing that Jesus committed suicide because he called Judas Iscariot to apostleship.  

In that case, pardon my ignorance.  When the time comes to beatify Pope Paul VI, I'll reserve the "creator of clown Masses" for him or even come up with a better one, like 'unifier of the Ecumenical Patriarchate'.   angel

Wait, that will be for Pope Francis.  That's why I'm not a RC hymnographer.
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 12:08:33 AM by SolEX01 » Logged
JoeS2
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Catholic by choice
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 1,004


St. Mark Defender of the true Faith (old CAF guy)


« Reply #17 on: Yesterday at 12:07:45 AM »

Also, the article did load and Blessed Pope John XXIII was a traditionalist.  Regardless, he convened Vatican II.

Sure, but you called him the "creator of clown Masses", and that's just not the case.  It's like arguing that Jesus committed suicide because he called Judas Iscariot to apostleship.  

Is it our job to be overly concerned about Popes being canonized or for that matter what Rome is doing?  Do we secretly envy not having a Popelike figure?  Why this fascination?  Just thinking.....
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 12:08:09 AM by JoeS2 » Logged
SolEX01
Merarches
***********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America, Holy Metropolis of New Jersey
Posts: 10,245


WWW
« Reply #18 on: Yesterday at 12:19:56 AM »

Also, the article did load and Blessed Pope John XXIII was a traditionalist.  Regardless, he convened Vatican II.

Sure, but you called him the "creator of clown Masses", and that's just not the case.  It's like arguing that Jesus committed suicide because he called Judas Iscariot to apostleship.  

Is it our job to be overly concerned about Popes being canonized or for that matter what Rome is doing?  Do we secretly envy not having a Popelike figure?  Why this fascination?  Just thinking.....

This is why Blessed Pope John Paul II is being canonized:

Example 1, we (e.g. the Vatican, the Roman Catholic Church) need to end Communism - let's select a Polish Pope who officiates Mass before 2 million people in Krakow and implores them not be afraid of a declining Communist power.  Two years later, the Solidarity Movement begins.  A decade later, the Berlin Wall falls.  Six years after death, Pope John Paul II will be beatified and only one more person needs to come forward with a miracle, which occurred after his death, to canonize him as St. Pope John Paul II. 

Logged
Auryn
Member
***
Offline Offline

Faith: Catholic converting to Orthodox
Posts: 77



« Reply #19 on: Yesterday at 02:27:19 AM »

I know of people who are leaving the RC bc of these 'canonizations'.  The mainstream majority like JPII and don't care, but those with even a little knowledge and concern have grave misgivings about the whole thing.  Most of the them are trying to make excuses like, canonizations are not infallible or he is only in heaven but is not to be imitated.  The whole thing is pretty sad really.
Logged

If there is prayer, the soul lives; without prayer, there is no spiritual life. + St. Theophan the Recluse +
Asteriktos
Protostrator
***************
Online Online

Faith: Like an arrow to the knee
Posts: 27,325


Happy 450th birthday, Mr. Shakespeare!


« Reply #20 on: Yesterday at 03:05:44 AM »

I know of people who are leaving the RC bc of these 'canonizations'. 

Is there more to it than that? Cause by itself that seems like a really strange reason to me...
Logged
Auryn
Member
***
Offline Offline

Faith: Catholic converting to Orthodox
Posts: 77



« Reply #21 on: Yesterday at 03:29:35 AM »

I know of people who are leaving the RC bc of these 'canonizations'. 

Is there more to it than that? Cause by itself that seems like a really strange reason to me...

Canonizing someone is an infallible act by the Pope, and if he's canonizing a man who everyone knows participated in acts of apostasy basically (assisi 1 and 2 etc) and encouraged it, taught it and never recanted,  then there doesn't need to be more to it than that.  Like I said, there can be some rationalization, but if it is a traditional Catholic, it's not good for their belief in the RC Church. 
Logged

If there is prayer, the soul lives; without prayer, there is no spiritual life. + St. Theophan the Recluse +
Maria
Orthodox Christian
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Posts: 6,374


O most Holy Theotokos, save us.


« Reply #22 on: Yesterday at 04:24:06 AM »

The site takes a long time to load.   Shocked

How long is long?  I don't have any significant problems.

I got the site immediately. But, BUT, BUT .. this caught my immediate attention:

Quote
John XXIII in His Own Words (3): Devotion to Saint Pius X and Blessed Pius IX

So it is true after all, they have already beatified Pius IX, and are going to canonize the instigator of the Dogma of Papal Infallibility and Papal Supremacy if they can get away with it. And the RC want unity with Orthodoxy? Hump.

http://www.newliturgicalmovement.org/index.html#7083681948211436301

Quote
 Meekness and humbleness of heart give graciousness in receiving, speaking and dealing with people, and the patience to bear, to pity, to keep silent and to encourage.  Above all, one must always be ready for the Lord’s surprise moves, for although he treats his loved ones well, he generally likes to test them with all sorts of trials such as bodily infirmities, bitterness of soul and sometimes opposition so powerful as to transform and wear out the life of the servant of God, the life of the servant of the servants of God, making it a real martyrdom.  I always think of Pius IX of sacred and glorious memory and, by imitating him in his sufferings, I would like to be worthy to celebrate his canonization.  (Journal, p. 299, between 29 Nov. and 5 Dec. 1959)
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 04:37:36 AM by Maria » Logged

Glory to Jesus Christ!
Glory to Him forever!
Charles Martel
Traditional Roman Catholic
Warned
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Roman Catholic
Jurisdiction: New york
Posts: 2,772


« Reply #23 on: Yesterday at 04:38:47 AM »

Quote
They think canonizing him will solidify these sentiments within the Church (e.g. "this recent pope-saint prayed with non-Christians, kissed the Quran etc. so it has to be a good thing!").

I got so excited about the coming sainthood of Blessed JP the Great that I immediately went out and brought a beautiful copy of the Quran in which I have tirelessly began studying and learning about this wonderful book from the desert prophet (pbuh).

I kiss it every morning to emulate this great man and soon to be saint of the church!

Thank you JPII!

Logged

Sancte Michael Archangele, defende nos in proelio, contra nequitiam et insidias diaboli esto praesidium.
xOrthodox4Christx
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Protestant (Inquirer)
Jurisdiction: Orthodox Christianity
Posts: 1,942


xOrthodox4Christx
« Reply #24 on: Yesterday at 08:28:54 AM »

Quote
They think canonizing him will solidify these sentiments within the Church (e.g. "this recent pope-saint prayed with non-Christians, kissed the Quran etc. so it has to be a good thing!").

I got so excited about the coming sainthood of Blessed JP the Great that I immediately went out and brought a beautiful copy of the Quran in which I have tirelessly began studying and learning about this wonderful book from the desert prophet (pbuh).

I kiss it every morning to emulate this great man and soon to be saint of the church!

Thank you JPII!



You asked for it...

Quote from: Shama'il Muhammadiyyah Book 34, Hadith 224
Aamir bin Sa'd radiyallahu anhu says, My father Sa'd said, "Rasoolullah sallallahu alaihe wasallam laughed on the day of the Battle of Khandaq till his teeth showed." Aamir radiyallahu anhu says, "I asked why did he laugh?" he replied, "A Kaafir had a shield, and Sa'd was a great archer. The kaafir protected himself by swaying the shield from side to side covering his forehead. (Sayyidina Sa'd radiyallahu anhu was a famous marksman, but the kaafir did not let the arrows get him). Sa'd radiyallahu anhu took an arrow (and kept it ready in the bow). When the non believer removed the shield from his head, he quickly aimed at the kaafir and did not miss the target, i.e. the (enemy's) forehead. The enemy immediately fell down, his legs rising into the air. On that Rasoolullah sallallahu alaihe wasallam laughed till his mabaraak teeth showed." I asked, "Why did Rasoolullah sallallahu alaihe wasallam laugh?" He replied, "Because of what Sa'd had done to the man."

http://sunnah.com/urn/1802230

So, the Catholic Church endorses this? And you're willing to emulate this?
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 08:36:29 AM by xOrthodox4Christx » Logged

I'm sorry.

Lord have mercy on me.
hecma925
Non-clairvoyant
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: OCA - Diocese of the South
Posts: 4,276


Pray for me, a sinner.


WWW
« Reply #25 on: Yesterday at 08:53:31 AM »

Quote
They think canonizing him will solidify these sentiments within the Church (e.g. "this recent pope-saint prayed with non-Christians, kissed the Quran etc. so it has to be a good thing!").

I got so excited about the coming sainthood of Blessed JP the Great that I immediately went out and brought a beautiful copy of the Quran in which I have tirelessly began studying and learning about this wonderful book from the desert prophet (pbuh).

I kiss it every morning to emulate this great man and soon to be saint of the church!

Thank you JPII!


LOL
Logged

Wandile
Peter the Roman
High Elder
******
Offline Offline

Faith: One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church - Roman Rite
Jurisdiction: Archdiocese of Pretoria, South Africa
Posts: 860


@Wandi_Star
« Reply #26 on: Yesterday at 10:34:33 AM »

I so wish they canonized Pope Pius XII. I agree with the current two canonizations as there is evidence of their sainthood in miracles and in their actions. To canonize someone does not mean they were sinless, but it is an act that affirms their sainthood; In that being, a sinner like us too, they managed to live the commands of God so well that their sins will never overshadow the work of God in them.


« Last Edit: Yesterday at 11:02:02 AM by Wandile » Logged

For it is a matter of necessity that every Church
should agree with this Church [of Rome] , on account of
its preeminent authority
St Irenaeus of Lyon

Would the heretics dare to come to the very seat of Peter whence apostolic faith is derived and whither no errors can come?
St. Cyprian
Asteriktos
Protostrator
***************
Online Online

Faith: Like an arrow to the knee
Posts: 27,325


Happy 450th birthday, Mr. Shakespeare!


« Reply #27 on: Yesterday at 11:08:29 AM »

I know of people who are leaving the RC bc of these 'canonizations'.

Is there more to it than that? Cause by itself that seems like a really strange reason to me...

Canonizing someone is an infallible act by the Pope, and if he's canonizing a man who everyone knows participated in acts of apostasy basically (assisi 1 and 2 etc) and encouraged it, taught it and never recanted,  then there doesn't need to be more to it than that.  Like I said, there can be some rationalization, but if it is a traditional Catholic, it's not good for their belief in the RC Church.  

Ok, my unfamiliarity with Catholicism is showing, but if someone could give me clarification on some things that'd be helpful. First, is canonization an act by the Pope, or by the Church as a whole? I assumed that with the (usually) lengthy and formal process involved that it wouldn't just boil down to the Pope? Second, if it does come down to the Pope, is it actually infallible? I've only ever heard that infallibility is something rarely exercised by the Pope, like maybe a few dozen times or maybe as few as two times, but in any event not in rather commonplace cases like glorifying a saint? Third, whether it comes down to the Pope or not, is the process in any way really infallible? I remember reading (perhaps wrongly?) that Catholics have revised their list of saints over the years. Perhaps they simply took some off the calendars to make room for others, but I seem to recall at least some saying that they had essentially revoked the sainthood of certain saints that modern scholars had deemed to mythological or unsubstantiated. Any truth there? And whether there is or isn't, is this really considered an example of infallibility in Catholicism?

Fourth, did Pope John Paul 2 commit apostasy? And did he never recant of this? Why then was not a new Pope elected? Or, was he condemned by either/anyone who followed? Fifth, is such thinking typical in Catholic ecclesiology, that the vicar of Christ and successor of Peter can apostatize and publically teach and endorse his wrong-headed teachings, and yet this doesn't become a big deal unless you try to glorify him as a saint? Can a Pope (can any bishop? any priest? anyone?) reside in some apostatizing middle ground in Catholicism between heretical teaching and right teaching, where he can stay on as pope but trying to glorify him as a saint brings the whole house of cards come tumbling down? Sixth, what was his apostatizing acts, exactly? I know he prayed with people and watched people from different religions do some dances, and he showed culturally-sensitive signs of respect to others, but where was the break, if there was a specific one?

And finally, seventh, the part that has me most confused... this? This? You mean of all the skeletons in the closet of Catholicism*, this is the problem that is making people say: "Well I could be Catholic before, but no more! I draw the line here! This is simply too horrible!"  This is the part that I least understand, why of all the theological problems and misguided actions and sinister popes and corrupt hierarchies in general over the centuries (and again, I don't think any other group escapes these problems), that this in particular would be the breaking point?

Anyway, thanks in advance for anyone who can set me straight here on what I'm not getting. Smiley


* And I think there are skeletons in the closet of every religious group of any significant size and history, since religions have the unavoidable problem of having humans as a central part of running and continuing them.
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 11:10:46 AM by Asteriktos » Logged
Sirach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 192


Just trying to learn something.


« Reply #28 on: Yesterday at 03:12:48 PM »

Asteriktos,

This Catholic Encyclopedia (1907) article helped me to understand the process, it may answer your questions:  Beatification and Canonization.

For my responses below, please preface each one with AFAIK.

Quote
First, is canonization an act by the Pope, or by the Church as a whole? I assumed that with the (usually) lengthy and formal process involved that it wouldn't just boil down to the Pope?

It can be either way.  See “formal canonization and equivalent canonization” in the referenced article.

Quote
Second, if it does come down to the Pope, is it actually infallible? I've only ever heard that infallibility is something rarely exercised by the Pope, like maybe a few dozen times or maybe as few as two times, but in any event not in rather commonplace cases like glorifying a saint?

The answer is generally yes, but it should be noted that the infallible pronouncement is only that the person is in heaven.  See “papal infallibility and canonization” in the referenced article.

Quote
Third, whether it comes down to the Pope or not, is the process in any way really infallible? I remember reading (perhaps wrongly?) that Catholics have revised their list of saints over the years. Perhaps they simply took some off the calendars to make room for others, but I seem to recall at least some saying that they had essentially revoked the sainthood of certain saints that modern scholars had deemed to mythological or unsubstantiated. Any truth there? And whether there is or isn't, is this really considered an example of infallibility in Catholicism?

As much as some non-Catholics like to ride the hobbyhorse of “papal infallibility” as an example of Roman Catholic hubris, or error; the requirements for something the Pope says to be infallible are pretty narrow: (1) The pontiff must teach in his public and official capacity as pastor and doctor of all Christians.  It must be clear that he speaks as spiritual head of the Church universal; (2) He teaches some doctrine of faith or morals; (3) It must be sufficiently evident that he wishes to determine some point of doctrine in an absolutely final and irrevocable way; and (4) It must be clear that the pope intends to bind the whole Church, to demand internal assent from all the faithful to his teaching.

Source.  Catholic Encyclopedia article on Infallibility

Concerning removing saints from the calendar, HERE is a short article on that.

Quote
Fourth, did Pope John Paul 2 commit apostasy? And did he never recant of this? Why then was not a new Pope elected? Or, was he condemned by either/anyone who followed?

Apart from the general Orthodox and Protestant belief that Catholicism in general, and the Pope in particular, is wrong (apostate, heretical, schismatic, misguided, deluded, etc.) about a lot of things, the claim that a particular Pope is apostate usually comes from individuals or extremely small groups of Catholics who think, basically, that the way things were done yesterday is the only correct way to do anything.  If the Pope does or says something that can possibly be interpreted as “liberal,” they will not give him the benefit of the doubt, nor will they consider a charitable way to understand his words/actions.   

Quote
Fifth, is such thinking typical in Catholic ecclesiology, that the vicar of Christ and successor of Peter can apostatize and publically teach and endorse his wrong-headed teachings, and yet this doesn't become a big deal unless you try to glorify him as a saint? Can a Pope (can any bishop? any priest? anyone?) reside in some apostatizing middle ground in Catholicism between heretical teaching and right teaching, where he can stay on as pope but trying to glorify him as a saint brings the whole house of cards come tumbling down?

No (see 4 above), and... when I think of apostasy, I think of theological opinions.  In the secular media the “problem” with the canonization of Pope John Paul II seems to be more centered on his purported mishandling of, or even alleged complicity in the clerical sex abuse cases.

Quote
Sixth, what was his apostatizing acts, exactly? I know he prayed with people and watched people from different religions do some dances, and he showed culturally-sensitive signs of respect to others, but where was the break, if there was a specific one?

You could probably Google this and get more information than you care to know.

Quote
And finally, seventh, the part that has me most confused... this? This?... This is the part that I least understand, why of all the theological problems and misguided actions and sinister popes and corrupt hierarchies in general over the centuries (and again, I don't think any other group escapes these problems), that this in particular would be the breaking point?

I don’t think that this is the breaking point.  However, what it is, is an opportunity for those with any kind of axe to grind against Catholicism (legitimate or not) to have their voice heard (if only on an internet forum).


Logged
Sirach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 192


Just trying to learn something.


« Reply #29 on: Yesterday at 03:30:02 PM »

From Roman Catholic Fr. John Zuhlsdorf,

"The decision to canonize Blesseds John XXIII and John Paul II at the same time, at the time when we are observing the 50th anniversary of the Second Vatican Council, is a kind of 'canonization' of the Second Vatican Council... The canonizations have even more to do (with) identifying the proper lens or hermeneutic by which we are to interpret the Council... This move is intended to identify John Paul II as our helper in interpreting difficult and controversial aspects of the Council...

John Paul, in his magisterium, commented at some point on virtually every controversial or disputed point in the Council documents and on the event of the Council itself.  He may not have solved, settled, definitively pronounced, on every controversial issue, but he offers commentary and insight on them...

I think what Francis is saying by this is that, if you have a problem with any aspect of the Council, turn to the papal teaching of St. John Paul II for clarifications and help in interpretation..."


Source.  Fr. Z's Blog
Logged
Auryn
Member
***
Offline Offline

Faith: Catholic converting to Orthodox
Posts: 77



« Reply #30 on: Yesterday at 04:56:41 PM »

I know of people who are leaving the RC bc of these 'canonizations'.

Is there more to it than that? Cause by itself that seems like a really strange reason to me...

Canonizing someone is an infallible act by the Pope, and if he's canonizing a man who everyone knows participated in acts of apostasy basically (assisi 1 and 2 etc) and encouraged it, taught it and never recanted,  then there doesn't need to be more to it than that.  Like I said, there can be some rationalization, but if it is a traditional Catholic, it's not good for their belief in the RC Church.  

Ok, my unfamiliarity with Catholicism is showing, but if someone could give me clarification on some things that'd be helpful. First, is canonization an act by the Pope, or by the Church as a whole? I assumed that with the (usually) lengthy and formal process involved that it wouldn't just boil down to the Pope? Second, if it does come down to the Pope, is it actually infallible? I've only ever heard that infallibility is something rarely exercised by the Pope, like maybe a few dozen times or maybe as few as two times, but in any event not in rather commonplace cases like glorifying a saint? Third, whether it comes down to the Pope or not, is the process in any way really infallible? I remember reading (perhaps wrongly?) that Catholics have revised their list of saints over the years. Perhaps they simply took some off the calendars to make room for others, but I seem to recall at least some saying that they had essentially revoked the sainthood of certain saints that modern scholars had deemed to mythological or unsubstantiated. Any truth there? And whether there is or isn't, is this really considered an example of infallibility in Catholicism?

Fourth, did Pope John Paul 2 commit apostasy? And did he never recant of this? Why then was not a new Pope elected? Or, was he condemned by either/anyone who followed? Fifth, is such thinking typical in Catholic ecclesiology, that the vicar of Christ and successor of Peter can apostatize and publically teach and endorse his wrong-headed teachings, and yet this doesn't become a big deal unless you try to glorify him as a saint? Can a Pope (can any bishop? any priest? anyone?) reside in some apostatizing middle ground in Catholicism between heretical teaching and right teaching, where he can stay on as pope but trying to glorify him as a saint brings the whole house of cards come tumbling down? Sixth, what was his apostatizing acts, exactly? I know he prayed with people and watched people from different religions do some dances, and he showed culturally-sensitive signs of respect to others, but where was the break, if there was a specific one?

And finally, seventh, the part that has me most confused... this? This? You mean of all the skeletons in the closet of Catholicism*, this is the problem that is making people say: "Well I could be Catholic before, but no more! I draw the line here! This is simply too horrible!"  This is the part that I least understand, why of all the theological problems and misguided actions and sinister popes and corrupt hierarchies in general over the centuries (and again, I don't think any other group escapes these problems), that this in particular would be the breaking point?

Anyway, thanks in advance for anyone who can set me straight here on what I'm not getting. Smiley


* And I think there are skeletons in the closet of every religious group of any significant size and history, since religions have the unavoidable problem of having humans as a central part of running and continuing them.


I'm speaking of traditional catholics.

The Pope did not always canonize saints, they were declared saints just by bishops in local areas or by popular acclaim.  But when the Pope canonizes a saint it is considered infallible.  So, yeah, if you believe in Papal Infallibility, and he's canonizing this guy....that's a big problem for some Catholics.  It would mean that Papal Infallibility is wrong and that's a big issue for them. 

As for JPII, he taught modernism and he backed it up with actions.  It's hard to explain to someone who isn't Catholic, but there is huge difference between how a modernist Catholic will see the situation and how traditional ones will see it.  It goes back to Vatican II.  SSPX and other groups reject things from Vatican II because it is modernist and contradicts earlier Church teaching but most Catholics accept it so they don't have a problem with JPII. 
Logged

If there is prayer, the soul lives; without prayer, there is no spiritual life. + St. Theophan the Recluse +
xOrthodox4Christx
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Protestant (Inquirer)
Jurisdiction: Orthodox Christianity
Posts: 1,942


xOrthodox4Christx
« Reply #31 on: Yesterday at 07:25:46 PM »

Pope Francis: Pope John XXIII was 'guided by the Lord'
Logged

I'm sorry.

Lord have mercy on me.
Nephi
Section Moderator
Archon
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Auntie Oak
Posts: 3,004



« Reply #32 on: Yesterday at 07:47:08 PM »

I'm speaking of traditional catholics.

The Pope did not always canonize saints, they were declared saints just by bishops in local areas or by popular acclaim.  But when the Pope canonizes a saint it is considered infallible.  So, yeah, if you believe in Papal Infallibility, and he's canonizing this guy....that's a big problem for some Catholics.  It would mean that Papal Infallibility is wrong and that's a big issue for them. 

My traditionalist friends have been kicking this around in that they affirm papal infallibility, but they question whether any such sainthood canonizations are in fact infallible or not.

Quote
As for JPII, he taught modernism and he backed it up with actions.  It's hard to explain to someone who isn't Catholic, but there is huge difference between how a modernist Catholic will see the situation and how traditional ones will see it.  It goes back to Vatican II.  SSPX and other groups reject things from Vatican II because it is modernist and contradicts earlier Church teaching but most Catholics accept it so they don't have a problem with JPII.

FWIW, not all of this discomfort belongs to SSPX groups. Even FSSP folks, and their sympathizers, who defend Vatican II "when properly understood" ("hermeneutic of continuity" and all that), take great issue with Pope John Paul II and his canonization, citing scandal and the indirect encouragement of heresy and such. But as an outsider these types seem to be merely a minority attempting to rationalize the behavior of the majority. It's really sad to see them trying to spiritually cope as they do, constantly being scandalized by almost everything around them that's at odds with their firm beliefs, and these canonizations are just icing on the cake.

I do understand why RC's like these are leaving, as it's not that somehow the canonizations are themselves the sole catalyst for their departure, but that they're the Church's seeming stamp of approval on everything that's already been causing them so much unhappiness and discontent. For many, they've been holding out hope against all odds that "things can/will get better," but this seems to say more strongly than anything that this reality, which they despise, is here to stay.
Logged

Liberalochian: Ecumenism Lite™
JoeS2
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Catholic by choice
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 1,004


St. Mark Defender of the true Faith (old CAF guy)


« Reply #33 on: Yesterday at 07:48:10 PM »

Pope Francis: Pope John XXIII was 'guided by the Lord'

As Orthodox Christians , does this make a hill of beans to us?
Logged
griego catolico
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Faith: Catholic
Posts: 189

...for the union of all, let us pray to the Lord.


« Reply #34 on: Yesterday at 08:10:04 PM »

I find the claim that the Pope should micromanage everything and in fact knows everything happening everywhere to be stretching a bit.

Interestingly, many FSSP-type traditionalists oppose their canonizations, but of course for very different reasons.

The Pope wants to spread Roman Catholicism by declaring more 'saints' especially the recent Popes as proofs that Papal Infallibility and Papal Supremacy are credible dogmas. As an attempt to cover the recent sexual abuse charges and to validate the New Novus Ordo, it is imperative that people realize that the Roman Catholic church and her Popes are Holy. What better way to accomplish this feat than to canonize these recent Popes?

Really?! How do you substantiate these claims? What are your sources?

By your reasoning, should I interpret the fact that the image of Our Lady of Guadalupe being included on the iconostasis of Saints Peter and Paul Antiochian Orthodox cathedral in Mexico means that Orthodox Christians are spreading Catholicism?
http://www.iglesiaortodoxa.org.mx/informacion/wp-content/uploads//DSC_1067.jpg
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 08:13:33 PM by griego catolico » Logged
JoeS2
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Catholic by choice
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 1,004


St. Mark Defender of the true Faith (old CAF guy)


« Reply #35 on: Yesterday at 08:20:01 PM »

I find the claim that the Pope should micromanage everything and in fact knows everything happening everywhere to be stretching a bit.

Interestingly, many FSSP-type traditionalists oppose their canonizations, but of course for very different reasons.

The Pope wants to spread Roman Catholicism by declaring more 'saints' especially the recent Popes as proofs that Papal Infallibility and Papal Supremacy are credible dogmas. As an attempt to cover the recent sexual abuse charges and to validate the New Novus Ordo, it is imperative that people realize that the Roman Catholic church and her Popes are Holy. What better way to accomplish this feat than to canonize these recent Popes?

Really?! How do you substantiate these claims? What are your sources?

By your reasoning, should I interpret the fact that the image of Our Lady of Guadalupe being included on the iconostasis of Saints Peter and Paul Antiochian Orthodox cathedral in Mexico means that Orthodox Christians are spreading Catholicism?
http://www.iglesiaortodoxa.org.mx/informacion/wp-content/uploads//DSC_1067.jpg

I doubt it seriously, and the Virgin is a cultural thing and Important to all Mexicans of faith.
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 08:20:19 PM by JoeS2 » Logged
Charles Martel
Traditional Roman Catholic
Warned
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Roman Catholic
Jurisdiction: New york
Posts: 2,772


« Reply #36 on: Yesterday at 08:38:43 PM »

Quote
They think canonizing him will solidify these sentiments within the Church (e.g. "this recent pope-saint prayed with non-Christians, kissed the Quran etc. so it has to be a good thing!").

I got so excited about the coming sainthood of Blessed JP the Great that I immediately went out and brought a beautiful copy of the Quran in which I have tirelessly began studying and learning about this wonderful book from the desert prophet (pbuh).

I kiss it every morning to emulate this great man and soon to be saint of the church!

Thank you JPII!



You asked for it...

Quote from: Shama'il Muhammadiyyah Book 34, Hadith 224
Aamir bin Sa'd radiyallahu anhu says, My father Sa'd said, "Rasoolullah sallallahu alaihe wasallam laughed on the day of the Battle of Khandaq till his teeth showed." Aamir radiyallahu anhu says, "I asked why did he laugh?" he replied, "A Kaafir had a shield, and Sa'd was a great archer. The kaafir protected himself by swaying the shield from side to side covering his forehead. (Sayyidina Sa'd radiyallahu anhu was a famous marksman, but the kaafir did not let the arrows get him). Sa'd radiyallahu anhu took an arrow (and kept it ready in the bow). When the non believer removed the shield from his head, he quickly aimed at the kaafir and did not miss the target, i.e. the (enemy's) forehead. The enemy immediately fell down, his legs rising into the air. On that Rasoolullah sallallahu alaihe wasallam laughed till his mabaraak teeth showed." I asked, "Why did Rasoolullah sallallahu alaihe wasallam laugh?" He replied, "Because of what Sa'd had done to the man."

http://sunnah.com/urn/1802230

So, the Catholic Church endorses this? And you're willing to emulate this?
I have no idea what that story proves or what point you're trying to make.

But at any  rate blessed JPII never kissed a Hadith. Wink
Logged

Sancte Michael Archangele, defende nos in proelio, contra nequitiam et insidias diaboli esto praesidium.
JoeS2
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Catholic by choice
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 1,004


St. Mark Defender of the true Faith (old CAF guy)


« Reply #37 on: Yesterday at 08:49:50 PM »

Quote
They think canonizing him will solidify these sentiments within the Church (e.g. "this recent pope-saint prayed with non-Christians, kissed the Quran etc. so it has to be a good thing!").

I got so excited about the coming sainthood of Blessed JP the Great that I immediately went out and brought a beautiful copy of the Quran in which I have tirelessly began studying and learning about this wonderful book from the desert prophet (pbuh).

I kiss it every morning to emulate this great man and soon to be saint of the church!

Thank you JPII!



You asked for it...

Quote from: Shama'il Muhammadiyyah Book 34, Hadith 224
Aamir bin Sa'd radiyallahu anhu says, My father Sa'd said, "Rasoolullah sallallahu alaihe wasallam laughed on the day of the Battle of Khandaq till his teeth showed." Aamir radiyallahu anhu says, "I asked why did he laugh?" he replied, "A Kaafir had a shield, and Sa'd was a great archer. The kaafir protected himself by swaying the shield from side to side covering his forehead. (Sayyidina Sa'd radiyallahu anhu was a famous marksman, but the kaafir did not let the arrows get him). Sa'd radiyallahu anhu took an arrow (and kept it ready in the bow). When the non believer removed the shield from his head, he quickly aimed at the kaafir and did not miss the target, i.e. the (enemy's) forehead. The enemy immediately fell down, his legs rising into the air. On that Rasoolullah sallallahu alaihe wasallam laughed till his mabaraak teeth showed." I asked, "Why did Rasoolullah sallallahu alaihe wasallam laugh?" He replied, "Because of what Sa'd had done to the man."

http://sunnah.com/urn/1802230

So, the Catholic Church endorses this? And you're willing to emulate this?
I have no idea what that story proves or what point you're trying to make.

But at any  rate blessed JPII never kissed a Hadith. Wink

Maybe because there are so many Hadiths out there , no one can tell which one is the more genuine.
Logged
Charles Martel
Traditional Roman Catholic
Warned
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Roman Catholic
Jurisdiction: New york
Posts: 2,772


« Reply #38 on: Yesterday at 08:55:13 PM »

Quote
They think canonizing him will solidify these sentiments within the Church (e.g. "this recent pope-saint prayed with non-Christians, kissed the Quran etc. so it has to be a good thing!").

I got so excited about the coming sainthood of Blessed JP the Great that I immediately went out and brought a beautiful copy of the Quran in which I have tirelessly began studying and learning about this wonderful book from the desert prophet (pbuh).

I kiss it every morning to emulate this great man and soon to be saint of the church!

Thank you JPII!



You asked for it...

Quote from: Shama'il Muhammadiyyah Book 34, Hadith 224
Aamir bin Sa'd radiyallahu anhu says, My father Sa'd said, "Rasoolullah sallallahu alaihe wasallam laughed on the day of the Battle of Khandaq till his teeth showed." Aamir radiyallahu anhu says, "I asked why did he laugh?" he replied, "A Kaafir had a shield, and Sa'd was a great archer. The kaafir protected himself by swaying the shield from side to side covering his forehead. (Sayyidina Sa'd radiyallahu anhu was a famous marksman, but the kaafir did not let the arrows get him). Sa'd radiyallahu anhu took an arrow (and kept it ready in the bow). When the non believer removed the shield from his head, he quickly aimed at the kaafir and did not miss the target, i.e. the (enemy's) forehead. The enemy immediately fell down, his legs rising into the air. On that Rasoolullah sallallahu alaihe wasallam laughed till his mabaraak teeth showed." I asked, "Why did Rasoolullah sallallahu alaihe wasallam laugh?" He replied, "Because of what Sa'd had done to the man."

http://sunnah.com/urn/1802230

So, the Catholic Church endorses this? And you're willing to emulate this?
I have no idea what that story proves or what point you're trying to make.

But at any  rate blessed JPII never kissed a Hadith. Wink

Maybe because there are so many Hadiths out there , no one can tell which one is the more genuine.
Ah, but there's only one Quran.

And one pope who kissed it.

God bless his soul, that man is a saint!.

Well, soon enough. Grin
Logged

Sancte Michael Archangele, defende nos in proelio, contra nequitiam et insidias diaboli esto praesidium.
JoeS2
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Catholic by choice
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 1,004


St. Mark Defender of the true Faith (old CAF guy)


« Reply #39 on: Yesterday at 10:02:10 PM »

Quote
They think canonizing him will solidify these sentiments within the Church (e.g. "this recent pope-saint prayed with non-Christians, kissed the Quran etc. so it has to be a good thing!").

I got so excited about the coming sainthood of Blessed JP the Great that I immediately went out and brought a beautiful copy of the Quran in which I have tirelessly began studying and learning about this wonderful book from the desert prophet (pbuh).

I kiss it every morning to emulate this great man and soon to be saint of the church!

Thank you JPII!



You asked for it...

Quote from: Shama'il Muhammadiyyah Book 34, Hadith 224
Aamir bin Sa'd radiyallahu anhu says, My father Sa'd said, "Rasoolullah sallallahu alaihe wasallam laughed on the day of the Battle of Khandaq till his teeth showed." Aamir radiyallahu anhu says, "I asked why did he laugh?" he replied, "A Kaafir had a shield, and Sa'd was a great archer. The kaafir protected himself by swaying the shield from side to side covering his forehead. (Sayyidina Sa'd radiyallahu anhu was a famous marksman, but the kaafir did not let the arrows get him). Sa'd radiyallahu anhu took an arrow (and kept it ready in the bow). When the non believer removed the shield from his head, he quickly aimed at the kaafir and did not miss the target, i.e. the (enemy's) forehead. The enemy immediately fell down, his legs rising into the air. On that Rasoolullah sallallahu alaihe wasallam laughed till his mabaraak teeth showed." I asked, "Why did Rasoolullah sallallahu alaihe wasallam laugh?" He replied, "Because of what Sa'd had done to the man."

http://sunnah.com/urn/1802230

So, the Catholic Church endorses this? And you're willing to emulate this?
I have no idea what that story proves or what point you're trying to make.

But at any  rate blessed JPII never kissed a Hadith. Wink

Maybe because there are so many Hadiths out there , no one can tell which one is the more genuine.
Ah, but there's only one Quran.

And one pope who kissed it.

God bless his soul, that man is a saint!.

Well, soon enough. Grin

You know it would have more credence if the Iman or Mufti or whatever they are called, would have reciprocated and kissed the Holy Bible.   No , I don't think Paul II is a saint but that's just me.
Logged
Asteriktos
Protostrator
***************
Online Online

Faith: Like an arrow to the knee
Posts: 27,325


Happy 450th birthday, Mr. Shakespeare!


« Reply #40 on: Yesterday at 10:08:18 PM »

Sorry I didn't post sooner, but thank you to Sirach and Auryn for the response/follow-up regarding the questions in my previous post  Smiley
Logged
xOrthodox4Christx
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Protestant (Inquirer)
Jurisdiction: Orthodox Christianity
Posts: 1,942


xOrthodox4Christx
« Reply #41 on: Yesterday at 10:20:36 PM »

Quote
They think canonizing him will solidify these sentiments within the Church (e.g. "this recent pope-saint prayed with non-Christians, kissed the Quran etc. so it has to be a good thing!").

I got so excited about the coming sainthood of Blessed JP the Great that I immediately went out and brought a beautiful copy of the Quran in which I have tirelessly began studying and learning about this wonderful book from the desert prophet (pbuh).

I kiss it every morning to emulate this great man and soon to be saint of the church!

Thank you JPII!



You asked for it...

Quote from: Shama'il Muhammadiyyah Book 34, Hadith 224
Aamir bin Sa'd radiyallahu anhu says, My father Sa'd said, "Rasoolullah sallallahu alaihe wasallam laughed on the day of the Battle of Khandaq till his teeth showed." Aamir radiyallahu anhu says, "I asked why did he laugh?" he replied, "A Kaafir had a shield, and Sa'd was a great archer. The kaafir protected himself by swaying the shield from side to side covering his forehead. (Sayyidina Sa'd radiyallahu anhu was a famous marksman, but the kaafir did not let the arrows get him). Sa'd radiyallahu anhu took an arrow (and kept it ready in the bow). When the non believer removed the shield from his head, he quickly aimed at the kaafir and did not miss the target, i.e. the (enemy's) forehead. The enemy immediately fell down, his legs rising into the air. On that Rasoolullah sallallahu alaihe wasallam laughed till his mabaraak teeth showed." I asked, "Why did Rasoolullah sallallahu alaihe wasallam laugh?" He replied, "Because of what Sa'd had done to the man."

http://sunnah.com/urn/1802230

So, the Catholic Church endorses this? And you're willing to emulate this?
I have no idea what that story proves or what point you're trying to make.

But at any  rate blessed JPII never kissed a Hadith. Wink

Maybe because there are so many Hadiths out there , no one can tell which one is the more genuine.
Ah, but there's only one Quran.

And one pope who kissed it.

God bless his soul, that man is a saint!.

Well, soon enough. Grin

You know it would have more credence if the Iman or Mufti or whatever they are called, would have reciprocated and kissed the Holy Bible.   No , I don't think Paul II is a saint but that's just me.

So if the Qur'an denies Christ, the Trinity and the Crucifixion (c.f., 4:157, 5:17, 5:72-73) that wouldn't be a big deal I suppose.
Logged

I'm sorry.

Lord have mercy on me.
Sirach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 192


Just trying to learn something.


« Reply #42 on: Yesterday at 10:49:38 PM »

Sorry I didn't post sooner, but thank you to Sirach and Auryn for the response/follow-up regarding the questions in my previous post  Smiley

You're welcome.
Logged
Tags:
Pages: 1   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.179 seconds with 71 queries.