OrthodoxChristianity.net
September 18, 2014, 02:13:28 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Reminder: No political discussions in the public fora.  If you do not have access to the private Politics Forum, please send a PM to Fr. George.
 
   Home   Help Calendar Contact Treasury Tags Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Keep the Filioque  (Read 10186 times) Average Rating: 0
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
scamandrius
Crusher of Secrets; House Lannister
Warned
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Greek Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Greek by desire; Antiochian by necessity
Posts: 5,996



« Reply #360 on: September 21, 2013, 08:27:24 PM »

I couldn't careless if you had a PhD with highest honors in Latin, doesn't make you some authority on the subject/

I didn't notice these gems until now! 
Could careless, couldn't don't really know Mor but I think you get my point.

Have had geez what is that past particle or something?

I sure am not a master of my native tongue

And yet you're somehow qualified to critique me as a Latinist.  Bravo.
Logged

I seek the truth by which no man was ever harmed--Marcus Aurelius

Those who do not read  history are doomed to get their facts from Hollywood--Anonymous

What earthly joy remains untouched by grief?--St. John Damascene
dzheremi
Warned
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Coptic
Posts: 4,192


« Reply #361 on: September 21, 2013, 08:31:20 PM »

Unfortunately, degrees don't seem to matter on the internet. Only in real life, where most people don't even argue about this stuff in the first place.
Logged

scamandrius
Crusher of Secrets; House Lannister
Warned
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Greek Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Greek by desire; Antiochian by necessity
Posts: 5,996



« Reply #362 on: September 21, 2013, 08:31:56 PM »

Credentials mean nothing when compared to arguments. I couldn't careless if you had a PhD with highest honors in Latin, doesn't make you some authority on the subject/

lulz

LOUDER:I am never disappointed when I am reminded how much our pop culture has devalued academic accomplishment while elevating opinion to an altar upon which it is worshipped like a Babylonian gold idol.

I'll add my voice to that! It sums up much of what happens here ...  Tongue Tongue Roll Eyes


I've played that game!



I didn't know that the movie Metropolis is the inspiration for Contra.  Now, I will have to dig out my old NES!
Logged

I seek the truth by which no man was ever harmed--Marcus Aurelius

Those who do not read  history are doomed to get their facts from Hollywood--Anonymous

What earthly joy remains untouched by grief?--St. John Damascene
scamandrius
Crusher of Secrets; House Lannister
Warned
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Greek Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Greek by desire; Antiochian by necessity
Posts: 5,996



« Reply #363 on: September 21, 2013, 08:32:27 PM »

Unfortunately, degrees don't seem to matter on the internet. Only in real life, where most people don't even argue about this stuff in the first place.

You've never been to my house. Wink
Logged

I seek the truth by which no man was ever harmed--Marcus Aurelius

Those who do not read  history are doomed to get their facts from Hollywood--Anonymous

What earthly joy remains untouched by grief?--St. John Damascene
Mor Ephrem
"Mor is right, you are wrong."
Section Moderator
Hoplitarches
*****
Online Online

Posts: 17,064


The Pope Emeritus reading OCNet


WWW
« Reply #364 on: September 21, 2013, 10:30:46 PM »

I couldn't careless if you had a PhD with highest honors in Latin, doesn't make you some authority on the subject/

I didn't notice these gems until now! 
Could careless, couldn't don't really know Mor but I think you get my point.

Have had geez what is that past particle or something?

I sure am not a master of my native tongue

And yet you're somehow qualified to critique me as a Latinist.  Bravo.

It's the yellow dot...beats a PhD any day of the week.
Logged

Apolytikion, Tone 1, by Antonis

An eloquent crafter of divine posts
And an inheritor of the line of the Baptist
A righteous son of India
And a new apostle to the internet
O Holy Mor Ephrem,
Intercede for us, that our forum may be saved.


"Mor is a jerk." - kelly
LBK
Merarches
***********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Posts: 10,706


Holy Father Patrick, pray for us!


« Reply #365 on: September 21, 2013, 10:49:19 PM »


It's the yellow dot...beats a PhD any day of the week.

ZING!!  laugh laugh
Logged
ignatius
Baptacathadox
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Roman Catholic > Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: OCA - Diocese of the South
Posts: 1,690


My Son Aidan... :-)


« Reply #366 on: September 21, 2013, 11:11:19 PM »

In Roman symbolism, wasn't the dove a symbol of 'peace'?
Logged

St Basil the Great (330-379 A.D.): “I think then that the one goal of all who are really and truly serving the Lord ought to be to bring back to union the churches who have at different times and in diverse manners divided from one another.”
Father H
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian--God's One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church
Jurisdiction: UOCofUSA-Ecumenical Patriarchate
Posts: 2,611



« Reply #367 on: September 27, 2013, 10:35:26 PM »

Unfortunately, degrees don't seem to matter on the internet. Only in real life, where most people don't even argue about this stuff in the first place.

lol.  Post of month (and no, I am not kidding). 
Note to self:  abstain from internet when possible.   
It matters in "real life" only in classes with people who have already been in the real world.  But even in classes, there are less boundaries than used to exist.  I can't wait to tell my ethics class (of medical professionals) that I am a priest, which won't happen until the 4th week. 
You are right that in general, people in real life don't even argue about this stuff.  In fact, most people are glad, if they can understand it, to have any nuggets of wisdom that surpass the normal garbage that they encounter daily.   
Logged
Father H
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian--God's One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church
Jurisdiction: UOCofUSA-Ecumenical Patriarchate
Posts: 2,611



« Reply #368 on: September 27, 2013, 10:37:46 PM »

I couldn't careless if you had a PhD with highest honors in Latin, doesn't make you some authority on the subject/

I didn't notice these gems until now! 
Could careless, couldn't don't really know Mor but I think you get my point.

Have had geez what is that past particle or something?

I sure am not a master of my native tongue

And yet you're somehow qualified to critique me as a Latinist.  Bravo.

It's the yellow dot...beats a PhD any day of the week.

 Roll Eyes

I used to like you.  Give me back my gift of frankincense.   Tongue
Logged
ialmisry
There's nothing John of Damascus can't answer
Warned
Hypatos
*****************
Online Online

Faith: جامعي Arab confesssing the Orthodox Faith of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church
Jurisdiction: Antioch (for now), but my heart belongs to Alexandria
Posts: 37,614



« Reply #369 on: September 28, 2013, 03:42:58 PM »

Unfortunately, degrees don't seem to matter on the internet. Only in real life, where most people don't even argue about this stuff in the first place.

lol.  Post of month (and no, I am not kidding). 
Note to self:  abstain from internet when possible.   
It matters in "real life" only in classes with people who have already been in the real world.  But even in classes, there are less boundaries than used to exist.  I can't wait to tell my ethics class (of medical professionals) that I am a priest, which won't happen until the 4th week. 
You are right that in general, people in real life don't even argue about this stuff.  In fact, most people are glad, if they can understand it, to have any nuggets of wisdom that surpass the normal garbage that they encounter daily.   
with the advent of reality TV, real life has been abolished, after decades of People Magazine and the National Enquirer making it obsolete.
Logged

Question a friend, perhaps he did not do it; but if he did anything so that he may do it no more.
A hasty quarrel kindles fire,
and urgent strife sheds blood.
If you blow on a spark, it will glow;
if you spit on it, it will be put out;
                           and both come out of your mouth
Mor Ephrem
"Mor is right, you are wrong."
Section Moderator
Hoplitarches
*****
Online Online

Posts: 17,064


The Pope Emeritus reading OCNet


WWW
« Reply #370 on: September 28, 2013, 05:08:21 PM »

I used to like you.  Give me back my gift of frankincense.   Tongue

Um, what incense, Father?  Smiley

(The yellow dot thing was a joke, btw...)
« Last Edit: September 28, 2013, 05:08:46 PM by Mor Ephrem » Logged

Apolytikion, Tone 1, by Antonis

An eloquent crafter of divine posts
And an inheritor of the line of the Baptist
A righteous son of India
And a new apostle to the internet
O Holy Mor Ephrem,
Intercede for us, that our forum may be saved.


"Mor is a jerk." - kelly
Cyrillic
Merarches
***********
Offline Offline

Posts: 9,213


Ceci n'est pas une pipe


« Reply #371 on: September 28, 2013, 05:13:39 PM »

I couldn't careless if you had a PhD with highest honors in Latin, doesn't make you some authority on the subject/

I didn't notice these gems until now! 
Could careless, couldn't don't really know Mor but I think you get my point.

Have had geez what is that past particle or something?

I sure am not a master of my native tongue

And yet you're somehow qualified to critique me as a Latinist.  Bravo.

I wouldn't worry to much about people on the internet questioning my credentials, Dr. Rdr. Scamandrius.
Logged

"But slay her he did not, for between dream and deed laws and practicalities remain"
-Willem Elschot, 'The Marriage'.
Romaios
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Romanian
Posts: 2,933



« Reply #372 on: September 28, 2013, 05:34:04 PM »

I used to like you.  Give me back my gift of frankincense.   Tongue

Um, what incense, Father?  Smiley

(The yellow dot thing was a joke, btw...)

"To incense" means in many an "Orthodox" language to praise or flatter someone, unlike in English where it can mean the opposite: to get mad at smth/smb or annoy.

Also, somebody who hasn't been to church much is called "unincensed" in Greek.
« Last Edit: September 28, 2013, 05:35:24 PM by Romaios » Logged
Mor Ephrem
"Mor is right, you are wrong."
Section Moderator
Hoplitarches
*****
Online Online

Posts: 17,064


The Pope Emeritus reading OCNet


WWW
« Reply #373 on: September 28, 2013, 05:43:35 PM »

Well that's definitely something I never knew until today.  Smiley
Logged

Apolytikion, Tone 1, by Antonis

An eloquent crafter of divine posts
And an inheritor of the line of the Baptist
A righteous son of India
And a new apostle to the internet
O Holy Mor Ephrem,
Intercede for us, that our forum may be saved.


"Mor is a jerk." - kelly
scamandrius
Crusher of Secrets; House Lannister
Warned
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Greek Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Greek by desire; Antiochian by necessity
Posts: 5,996



« Reply #374 on: September 29, 2013, 02:07:22 PM »

I couldn't careless if you had a PhD with highest honors in Latin, doesn't make you some authority on the subject/

I didn't notice these gems until now! 
Could careless, couldn't don't really know Mor but I think you get my point.

Have had geez what is that past particle or something?

I sure am not a master of my native tongue

And yet you're somehow qualified to critique me as a Latinist.  Bravo.

I wouldn't worry to much about people on the internet questioning my credentials, Dr. Rdr. Scamandrius.

You're right, Cyrillic, but as I'm no fan of Achronos and he's no fan of mine,  I took it more personally than I should have.
Logged

I seek the truth by which no man was ever harmed--Marcus Aurelius

Those who do not read  history are doomed to get their facts from Hollywood--Anonymous

What earthly joy remains untouched by grief?--St. John Damascene
Shiny
Site Supporter
Moderated
Toumarches
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Groucho Marxist
Jurisdiction: Dahntahn Stoop Haus
Posts: 13,267


Paint It Red


« Reply #375 on: September 29, 2013, 02:11:37 PM »

This is how terrible my memory has become I don't even remember writing the above.

But yeah I don't care what degrees you have, unless you are using it in the context of a blank waving contest.
« Last Edit: September 29, 2013, 02:19:00 PM by Achronos » Logged

“There is your brother, naked, crying, and you stand there confused over the choice of an attractive floor covering.”

– St. Ambrose of Milan
scamandrius
Crusher of Secrets; House Lannister
Warned
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Greek Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Greek by desire; Antiochian by necessity
Posts: 5,996



« Reply #376 on: September 29, 2013, 02:18:53 PM »

This is how terrible my memory has become I don't even remember writing the above.

But yeah I don't care what degrees you have, unless you are using it in the context of a  penis waving contest.

Because that's exactly what I was doing.

Logged

I seek the truth by which no man was ever harmed--Marcus Aurelius

Those who do not read  history are doomed to get their facts from Hollywood--Anonymous

What earthly joy remains untouched by grief?--St. John Damascene
Shiny
Site Supporter
Moderated
Toumarches
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Groucho Marxist
Jurisdiction: Dahntahn Stoop Haus
Posts: 13,267


Paint It Red


« Reply #377 on: September 29, 2013, 02:20:34 PM »

This is how terrible my memory has become I don't even remember writing the above.

But yeah I don't care what degrees you have, unless you are using it in the context of a  penis waving contest.

Because that's exactly what I was doing.


Yeah that is exactly what you are doing.

Anytime you appeal to your own accomplishments in order to "make" an argument it is questionable at best.

All you are trying to do is assert your superiority over anyone else.

Now get mad again like you always do. Call me a troll or an idiot because that's all you got.
« Last Edit: September 29, 2013, 02:21:06 PM by Achronos » Logged

“There is your brother, naked, crying, and you stand there confused over the choice of an attractive floor covering.”

– St. Ambrose of Milan
Mor Ephrem
"Mor is right, you are wrong."
Section Moderator
Hoplitarches
*****
Online Online

Posts: 17,064


The Pope Emeritus reading OCNet


WWW
« Reply #378 on: September 29, 2013, 02:31:17 PM »

Anytime you appeal to your own accomplishments in order to "make" an argument it is questionable at best.

All you are trying to do is assert your superiority over anyone else.

If you think his argument was "I have a PhD in Latin so shut the ____ up", you aren't thinking when you read. 
Logged

Apolytikion, Tone 1, by Antonis

An eloquent crafter of divine posts
And an inheritor of the line of the Baptist
A righteous son of India
And a new apostle to the internet
O Holy Mor Ephrem,
Intercede for us, that our forum may be saved.


"Mor is a jerk." - kelly
dzheremi
Warned
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Coptic
Posts: 4,192


« Reply #379 on: September 29, 2013, 02:42:27 PM »

Bringing up credentials in a context in which a person questions the basis for your assertions is not an appeal to accomplishments. It's an appeal to experience. It's saying, in essence, "I know about this topic because I worked on it for hundreds/thousands of hours, wrote a thesis/dissertation, took qualifying exams, etc., so I have a lot of experience with it, and that experience/those papers/exams have been confirmed by my peers in the field (i.e., thesis/dissertation committe, department chair, etc.), leading to my degree." It is most definitely not saying "I have a degree and you don't, therefore I am right and you are not."

If you don't want to listen to other people who have degrees in the field(s) under consideration, that's on you, but please do not attempt to reduce the very hard work that goes into getting a degree into an excuse by arrogant people to wave their credentials in other people's faces. That's not what it's about, and it's a rather ugly stereotype to be propagating about other people just because they've worked really hard on something that is important to them. I don't know what you do for a living, Achronos, but I would think you would find it very inappropriate for someone to seize upon it in order to make you out to be a jerk when you're just doing what you've been trained/trained yourself to do in order to work and live.
Logged

Shiny
Site Supporter
Moderated
Toumarches
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Groucho Marxist
Jurisdiction: Dahntahn Stoop Haus
Posts: 13,267


Paint It Red


« Reply #380 on: September 29, 2013, 03:08:30 PM »

Anytime you appeal to your own accomplishments in order to "make" an argument it is questionable at best.

All you are trying to do is assert your superiority over anyone else.

If you think his argument was "I have a PhD in Latin so shut the ____ up", you aren't thinking when you read. 
Orthonorm called my credentials into question by implying I'm some lowly high school teacher who couldn't possibly know anything about Latin or even be called a Latinist.  I have a B.A. in Classical Languages, an M.A. in Classical Language another in English and my Ph.D. in Classical Studies with my area of concentration being Late Antiquity, focusing on the Latin West from 200-700 A.D. I hope this clears up any question about my credentials to discuss anything Latin related.  If you need anything more before I submit future posts, please PM me.

No your reading comprehension needs work.
Logged

“There is your brother, naked, crying, and you stand there confused over the choice of an attractive floor covering.”

– St. Ambrose of Milan
Shiny
Site Supporter
Moderated
Toumarches
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Groucho Marxist
Jurisdiction: Dahntahn Stoop Haus
Posts: 13,267


Paint It Red


« Reply #381 on: September 29, 2013, 03:22:01 PM »

Bringing up credentials in a context in which a person questions the basis for your assertions is not an appeal to accomplishments.
Uh yes it is Jeremy.

If you can't make a good argument for which you are discussion and then pull out your cred in order to justify poor arguments, that is an appeal to past achievments rather than THE ACTUAL ARGUMENTS.

That is my entire point which you and the others here have consistently missed.

Arguments matter not the papers that are framed up on the wall.

Guess what Jeremy, there have been plenty of people who have PhDs that are total hacks.

It doesn't make you an expert at anything.


Quote
It's an appeal to experience.
Outside of the degrees what experience then?

Because working towards those degrees are not real life experiences. Period.

Quote
It's saying, in essence, "I know about this topic because I worked on it for hundreds/thousands of hours, wrote a thesis/dissertation, took qualifying exams, etc., so I have a lot of experience with it, and that experience/those papers/exams have been confirmed by my peers in the field (i.e., thesis/dissertation committe, department chair, etc.), leading to my degree." It is most definitely not saying "I have a degree and you don't, therefore I am right and you are not."
We don't know what he did to work for it, all we know is he has papers.

Again it doesn't matter. Stick to the arguments because the proof is in the pudding.

And let's not get into the standards of higher education on getting those degrees. The majority of all bachelor degree graduates have retained zip from their education.

Quote
but please do not attempt to reduce the very hard work that goes into getting a degree into an excuse by arrogant people to wave their credentials in other people's faces.
Where is my reduction? Getting defensive now Jeremy?

And yes that is EXACTLY what he did above. You clearly need to work on reading too.

Quote
That's not what it's about, and it's a rather ugly stereotype to be propagating about other people just because they've worked really hard on something that is important to them.
OK so what?

Quote
I don't know what you do for a living, Achronos, but I would think you would find it very inappropriate for someone to seize upon it in order to make you out to be a jerk when you're just doing what you've been trained/trained yourself to do in order to work and live.
That doesn't make any sense.

Go ahead and disparage what I do for a living.

I am satisfied and happy with my decisions in life, and I don't feel the need to point to any of it to assert me being better than others here.

Nor do I need to point to my credentials in order to make an argument.

scamandrius has done this in the past, this is not just the first time.

You see Jeremy, older people love to point to their own successes in the past as a means to overcome their own personal problems with age and then pass that judgment over younger people such as myself because hey we have more upside.
« Last Edit: September 29, 2013, 03:24:31 PM by Achronos » Logged

“There is your brother, naked, crying, and you stand there confused over the choice of an attractive floor covering.”

– St. Ambrose of Milan
TheTrisagion
Armed Feline rider of Flaming Unicorns
Taxiarches
**********
Online Online

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Antiochian
Posts: 7,992



« Reply #382 on: September 29, 2013, 04:39:00 PM »

I have a PhD in forumology and it is my professional opinion that this thread is a travesty.  I will be using it as an example of what not to do in my next book due out in stores in November.  Mention this post and you get a 10% discount.
Logged

Have you considered the possibility that your face is an ad hominem?
Somebody just went all Jack Chick up in here.
Shiny
Site Supporter
Moderated
Toumarches
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Groucho Marxist
Jurisdiction: Dahntahn Stoop Haus
Posts: 13,267


Paint It Red


« Reply #383 on: September 29, 2013, 05:14:06 PM »

I have a PhD in forumology and it is my professional opinion that this thread is a travesty.  I will be using it as an example of what not to do in my next book due out in stores in November.  Mention this post and you get a 10% discount.
Good thing you aren't wasting included bookmarks.
Logged

“There is your brother, naked, crying, and you stand there confused over the choice of an attractive floor covering.”

– St. Ambrose of Milan
dzheremi
Warned
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Coptic
Posts: 4,192


« Reply #384 on: September 29, 2013, 05:35:01 PM »

I don't really want to get into a back-and-forth about this, but my point is that to treat a degree as though it is only a 'piece of paper that is framed up on a wall' just because there certainly are some PhD's that are hacks (there are hacks in every walk of life, but that doesn't generally devalue whatever profession they're in, only them as individuals) does not accurately represent what is actually involved in getting a degree, or what having a degree actually means. It's not the be-all and end-all of any argument, nor a free pass to wave your credentials in anyone's face, but it does represent real work and real knowledge gained in a given field. To say "We don't know what he did to work for it, we just know he has papers" is odd. We might not know the exact credit-hours formula (this varies by university; while I am done with courses, from what I can remember, at my current university it is 36 hours + qualifying exams or 24 + thesis), this is largely irrelevant, as the 'papers' are what you get for doing the work, so by virtue of having the papers, we can know that he (or anyone who is granted a degree) has done the work. At any reputable university, they're not handed out just for showing up. That was my whole point. The degree represents the work, and the confirmation of the work as valuable and scientifically valid (for scientific fields, that is) in so far that they are accepted toward the degree.
Logged

ilyazhito
High Elder
******
Offline Offline

Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: ROCOR
Posts: 889



« Reply #385 on: September 29, 2013, 05:39:56 PM »

If the filioque were to be kept, it would be "qui ex patri per filium procedit", as that would make more sense, because the Father is the only source of the Godhead. All three members of the Trinity are distinct, and implying that the Holy Spirit proceeds from both Father and Son causes theological absurdities, in addition to not being approved by an ecumenical council.
Logged
Mor Ephrem
"Mor is right, you are wrong."
Section Moderator
Hoplitarches
*****
Online Online

Posts: 17,064


The Pope Emeritus reading OCNet


WWW
« Reply #386 on: September 29, 2013, 06:09:29 PM »

Anytime you appeal to your own accomplishments in order to "make" an argument it is questionable at best.

All you are trying to do is assert your superiority over anyone else.

If you think his argument was "I have a PhD in Latin so shut the ____ up", you aren't thinking when you read. 
Orthonorm called my credentials into question by implying I'm some lowly high school teacher who couldn't possibly know anything about Latin or even be called a Latinist.  I have a B.A. in Classical Languages, an M.A. in Classical Language another in English and my Ph.D. in Classical Studies with my area of concentration being Late Antiquity, focusing on the Latin West from 200-700 A.D. I hope this clears up any question about my credentials to discuss anything Latin related.  If you need anything more before I submit future posts, please PM me.

No your reading comprehension needs work.

Keep digging, friend...one day we'll all end up in such a hole, but you will have been prepared.
Logged

Apolytikion, Tone 1, by Antonis

An eloquent crafter of divine posts
And an inheritor of the line of the Baptist
A righteous son of India
And a new apostle to the internet
O Holy Mor Ephrem,
Intercede for us, that our forum may be saved.


"Mor is a jerk." - kelly
edati
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople
Posts: 17



« Reply #387 on: September 29, 2013, 06:51:09 PM »

Anytime you appeal to your own accomplishments in order to "make" an argument it is questionable at best.

All you are trying to do is assert your superiority over anyone else.

If you think his argument was "I have a PhD in Latin so shut the ____ up", you aren't thinking when you read. 
Orthonorm called my credentials into question by implying I'm some lowly high school teacher who couldn't possibly know anything about Latin or even be called a Latinist.  I have a B.A. in Classical Languages, an M.A. in Classical Language another in English and my Ph.D. in Classical Studies with my area of concentration being Late Antiquity, focusing on the Latin West from 200-700 A.D. I hope this clears up any question about my credentials to discuss anything Latin related.  If you need anything more before I submit future posts, please PM me.

No your reading comprehension needs work.

Keep digging, friend...one day we'll all end up in such a hole, but you will have been prepared.

scamandrius' argument started way up than Achronos posted,


That's not how your Creed reads.  That's how you want us to believe you mean it, but you can't prove that conclusively from your own Church's historical records, nor can you argue that this is the plain sense of the Latin text or its various translations. 

Exactly.  You cannot have one verb (procedit) mean one thing when it relates to "from the Father" (ex patre) and then mean another thing when it relates to the "and from the Son" (filioque).   Speaking as a Latinist, I can find no instance in classical or post-classical Latin where the verb has two different (if not opposite) meanings when it is employed only one time for two different prepositional phrases.  Show me some evidence from the TLL or Lewis and Short and I'll reconsider it.  It's nothing but linguistic gymnastics that would make Suetonius blush!
Actually, some words are capable of analogical or even equivocal predication .

Yes, but that is NOT what's going on here.  Again, you show me some other Latin EVIDENCE that procedit will assume different meanings with each object of the same preposition "ex" and I'll reconsider my objection (not to the filioque theologically, but to your linguistic contortions).  Until you can provide EVIDENCE in the Latin language that this has happened before, I will reject it.

I'm still waiting for filioquists to answer the argument presented, AND the evidence that scamandrius was asking. What do you have Achronos?

Logged

And He said to them, It is written, 'MY HOUSE SHALL BE CALLED A HOUSE OF PRAYER.'

Lord, heal my soul for I have sinned against you.
Apotheoun
"Three realities pertain to God: essence, energy, and the triad of divine hypostaseis." St. Gregory Palamas
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Catholic
Jurisdiction: Melkite Catholic
Posts: 1,388


St. John Maximovitch


WWW
« Reply #388 on: September 29, 2013, 07:15:25 PM »

If the filioque were to be kept, it would be "qui ex patri per filium procedit", as that would make more sense, because the Father is the only source of the Godhead. All three members of the Trinity are distinct, and implying that the Holy Spirit proceeds from both Father and Son causes theological absurdities, in addition to not being approved by an ecumenical council.
The creed is about the origin of the Spirit from the Father, while the per filium is not. Neither the filioque nor the per filium belong in the creed.
Logged

"All that the Father has belongs likewise to the Son, except Causality."
St. Gregory Nazianzen

"We should believe that divine grace is present in the icon of Christ and that it communicates sanctification to those who draw near with faith."
St. Theodore Studite
ilyazhito
High Elder
******
Offline Offline

Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: ROCOR
Posts: 889



« Reply #389 on: October 01, 2013, 01:54:27 PM »

Yes, even the per filium formulation does not belong. The Holy Spirit is sent through the Son from the Father, so that would have to be specified if any changes were to be made to the creed. However, I would not change the Creed without another ecumenical council, and I think that the current formulation is more than satisfactory. Even in the West, the Pope who crowned Charlemagne inscribed the Creed on St. Peter's Basilica without the Filioque.
Logged
Apotheoun
"Three realities pertain to God: essence, energy, and the triad of divine hypostaseis." St. Gregory Palamas
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Catholic
Jurisdiction: Melkite Catholic
Posts: 1,388


St. John Maximovitch


WWW
« Reply #390 on: October 01, 2013, 03:05:33 PM »

The creed was designed to speak to the origination of the Son and the Spirit, i.e., theologia properly speaking. The per filium is not about that and has no place in the creed. The creed should be accepted, without any changes, as it was put forth at the Council of Constantinople.
Logged

"All that the Father has belongs likewise to the Son, except Causality."
St. Gregory Nazianzen

"We should believe that divine grace is present in the icon of Christ and that it communicates sanctification to those who draw near with faith."
St. Theodore Studite
Apotheoun
"Three realities pertain to God: essence, energy, and the triad of divine hypostaseis." St. Gregory Palamas
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Catholic
Jurisdiction: Melkite Catholic
Posts: 1,388


St. John Maximovitch


WWW
« Reply #391 on: October 01, 2013, 03:08:40 PM »

However, I would not change the Creed without another ecumenical council, and I think that the current formulation is more than satisfactory.
I would not change the creed even at an ecumenical council. It should stand as it has been set forth by the God-inspired Fathers of the Council of Constantinople (A.D. 381).
Logged

"All that the Father has belongs likewise to the Son, except Causality."
St. Gregory Nazianzen

"We should believe that divine grace is present in the icon of Christ and that it communicates sanctification to those who draw near with faith."
St. Theodore Studite
TheTrisagion
Armed Feline rider of Flaming Unicorns
Taxiarches
**********
Online Online

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Antiochian
Posts: 7,992



« Reply #392 on: October 01, 2013, 03:12:29 PM »

However, I would not change the Creed without another ecumenical council, and I think that the current formulation is more than satisfactory.
I would not change the creed even at an ecumenical council. It should stand as it has been set forth by the God-inspired Fathers of the Council of Constantinople (A.D. 381).
Well, it if was an ecumenical council, then it would be God-inspired Fathers setting forth the revision.  That being said, I think there is a snowball's chance in the Amazon of the Church deciding to change the Creed, so I'm not too concerned.  laugh
Logged

Have you considered the possibility that your face is an ad hominem?
Somebody just went all Jack Chick up in here.
Papist
Patriarch of Pontification
Toumarches
************
Offline Offline

Faith: Catholic
Jurisdiction: Byzantine
Posts: 12,191


Praying for the Christians in Iraq


« Reply #393 on: October 01, 2013, 04:37:29 PM »

However, I would not change the Creed without another ecumenical council, and I think that the current formulation is more than satisfactory.
I would not change the creed even at an ecumenical council. It should stand as it has been set forth by the God-inspired Fathers of the Council of Constantinople (A.D. 381).
Well, it if was an ecumenical council, then it would be God-inspired Fathers setting forth the revision.  That being said, I think there is a snowball's chance in the Amazon of the Church deciding to change the Creed, so I'm not too concerned.  laugh
I still would have no problem returning to wording of Nicea. I mean, that's the way we recite it the Byzantine parish I attend anyway.  Grin
Logged

Note Papist's influence from the tyrannical monarchism of traditional papism .
Apotheoun
"Three realities pertain to God: essence, energy, and the triad of divine hypostaseis." St. Gregory Palamas
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Catholic
Jurisdiction: Melkite Catholic
Posts: 1,388


St. John Maximovitch


WWW
« Reply #394 on: October 01, 2013, 04:47:10 PM »

However, I would not change the Creed without another ecumenical council, and I think that the current formulation is more than satisfactory.
I would not change the creed even at an ecumenical council. It should stand as it has been set forth by the God-inspired Fathers of the Council of Constantinople (A.D. 381).
Well, it if was an ecumenical council, then it would be God-inspired Fathers setting forth the revision.  That being said, I think there is a snowball's chance in the Amazon of the Church deciding to change the Creed, so I'm not too concerned.  laugh
It would be a change in the creed that would alter the original intention, which was to speak about the origin of the Son and Spirit. To add the per filium would mean that the creed no longer dealt with the Spirit's hypostatic origin, but simply His progression as grace. As I see it that would be a rather radical and completely unnecessary change to the creed.
« Last Edit: October 01, 2013, 04:47:49 PM by Apotheoun » Logged

"All that the Father has belongs likewise to the Son, except Causality."
St. Gregory Nazianzen

"We should believe that divine grace is present in the icon of Christ and that it communicates sanctification to those who draw near with faith."
St. Theodore Studite
orthonorm
Hoplitarches
*************
Offline Offline

Faith: Sola Gratia
Jurisdiction: Outside
Posts: 16,502



« Reply #395 on: October 01, 2013, 05:25:39 PM »

I don't really want to get into a back-and-forth about this, but my point is that to treat a degree as though it is only a 'piece of paper that is framed up on a wall' just because there certainly are some PhD's that are hacks (there are hacks in every walk of life, but that doesn't generally devalue whatever profession they're in, only them as individuals) does not accurately represent what is actually involved in getting a degree, or what having a degree actually means. It's not the be-all and end-all of any argument, nor a free pass to wave your credentials in anyone's face, but it does represent real work and real knowledge gained in a given field. To say "We don't know what he did to work for it, we just know he has papers" is odd. We might not know the exact credit-hours formula (this varies by university; while I am done with courses, from what I can remember, at my current university it is 36 hours + qualifying exams or 24 + thesis), this is largely irrelevant, as the 'papers' are what you get for doing the work, so by virtue of having the papers, we can know that he (or anyone who is granted a degree) has done the work. At any reputable university, they're not handed out just for showing up. That was my whole point. The degree represents the work, and the confirmation of the work as valuable and scientifically valid (for scientific fields, that is) in so far that they are accepted toward the degree.

They are handed out pretty much for just showing up. Even at reputable Universities, but the point here is, let your words HERE be louder than the letters you think you have to offer as back-up when making the most propedeutic of points.

Let's pick on Romeo.

I think he told me once he was from Romania and studied something, maybe philology, I don't remember. I don't really care.

This was in response to some compliment by me: like how many PhDs do you have??!?!?!?, cause his posts here show he knows what he is talking about.

Nothing that gets talked about here for the most part, especially regarding language, theology, or history is terribly sophisticated, so no one here needs to tell me how they wasted their time to impress me. No need to resort to University cred. If you are a REAL doctor, like give out meds, then please let me know that when you talk about subjects related to health. Or if you dismiss some science around here, OTHERS would need your credentials cause the science literacy around is about nil if you look at stuff like creation or diet thread.

There are a lot of people here who are obvious experts to any informed lay person reading their posts (this is not inclusive):

Punch
Romeo
Opus
Isa
Ionnis
* (Yeah, I am serious about *)

Two out of those folks I don't necessarily get butterflies in my stomach when I see their name and yet they have an obvious grasp and expertise of certain subjects and I would be a fool to ignore them.

One of them is a high school teacher with a PhD!!!!!!!! and I bet his students reap a lot from his studies and expansive knowledge.

So show, don't tell. Many here should have learned in that grade school before they got their PhD.

Logged

Ignorance is not a lack, but a passion.
orthonorm
Hoplitarches
*************
Offline Offline

Faith: Sola Gratia
Jurisdiction: Outside
Posts: 16,502



« Reply #396 on: October 01, 2013, 05:28:09 PM »

Orthonorm called my credentials into question by implying I'm some lowly high school teacher who couldn't possibly know anything about Latin or even be called a Latinist.  I have a B.A. in Classical Languages, an M.A. in Classical Language another in English and my Ph.D. in Classical Studies with my area of concentration being Late Antiquity, focusing on the Latin West from 200-700 A.D. I hope this clears up any question about my credentials to discuss anything Latin related.  If you need anything more before I submit future posts, please PM me.

LOL. I didn't see all this fall out. Talk about spin.

I didn't do the above. I pointed out you were a high school teacher. You made and connected the rest of the dots.

It's your cross not mine you're dragging around.
« Last Edit: October 01, 2013, 05:29:27 PM by orthonorm » Logged

Ignorance is not a lack, but a passion.
JoeS2
Warned
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Catholic by choice
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 1,123


St. Mark Defender of the true Faith (old CAF guy)


« Reply #397 on: October 01, 2013, 06:14:07 PM »

Bottom Line:

You keep the Filioque

We are happy without it.

End of subject.
Logged
orthonorm
Hoplitarches
*************
Offline Offline

Faith: Sola Gratia
Jurisdiction: Outside
Posts: 16,502



« Reply #398 on: October 01, 2013, 06:54:01 PM »

Bottom Line:

You keep the Filioque

We are happy without it.

End of subject.

Except many of the arguments against it, scam's for instance, make zero sense.

And really as someone who doesn't care, Papist has been clear elsewhere and what little I've read here that his understanding of the symbol of faith is rather Orthodox.

I'll let the teachers figure this all out. I would rather skip school frankly.
Logged

Ignorance is not a lack, but a passion.
Shlomlokh
主哀れめよ!
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Bulgarian
Posts: 1,236



« Reply #399 on: October 01, 2013, 07:06:46 PM »

Bottom Line:

You keep the Filioque

We are happy without it.

End of subject.

Except many of the arguments against it, scam's for instance, make zero sense.

And really as someone who doesn't care, Papist has been clear elsewhere and what little I've read here that his understanding of the symbol of faith is rather Orthodox.

I'll let the teachers figure this all out. I would rather skip school frankly.
And here we thought you were dead!
Logged

"I will pour out my prayer unto the Lord, and to Him will I proclaim my grief; for with evils my soul is filled, and my life unto hades hath drawn nigh, and like Jonah I will pray: From corruption raise me up, O God." -Ode VI, Irmos of the Supplicatory Canon to the Theotokos
Peter J
Formerly PJ
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Melkite
Posts: 6,123



« Reply #400 on: October 10, 2013, 07:48:15 PM »

The issue is whether the Father is the sole source/originator (ἐκπορεύεσθαι) of the Spirit or not. Whether procedit in Latin can mean send is an entirely different issue.

The question is this: if we use the Greek word ekporeuesthai to describe the procession of the Holy Spirit, instead of the word procedit would it be heresy?
That is why I put forward the proposal in the post below:

Maybe the Latins should come up with a new way of translating the portion of the creed that concerns the Holy Spirit, and in the process truly clarify matters and help to bring about a real common understanding of the Spirit's existential origin from the Father alone.

Something like this:  "Et in Spiritum Sanctum, Dominum et vivificantem, qui egreditur ex Patre, qui cum Patre et Filio adoratur et glorificatur . . ."
Perhaps if the Roman Church basically designated a Latin word (e.g., egreditur) that would exclusively be used to translate the Greek term ἐκπορεύεσθαι real progress could be made on the issue of the origin of the Holy Spirit. Nevertheless, I admit that my own take on the issue is that Rome really does not want to clarify the issue if the clarification involves either relativizing or worse repudiating (i.e., from the Roman Catholic perspective) what was put forward at Lyons II and Florence.

At the risk of going off on a tanget, have you ever read the paper "Roman Presidency and Christian Unity in our Time" (Woodstock Forum, September 25, 2005) by Father Thomas Hopko? Particularly this part:

Quote
He [the pope] would have to confirm the original text of the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Symbol of Faith and defend its use in all the churches, beginning with his own. At the very least (should some churches for pastoral reasons be permitted to keep the filioque in their creed), he would insist on an explanation that would clearly teach that the Holy Spirit “proceeds from the Son” only in relation to God’s saving dispensation in the world. He would make certain that no Christian be tempted to believe that the Holy Spirit essentially proceeds from the Father and the Son together, and certainly not “from both as from one" (ab utroque sicut ab uno).
Logged

- Peter Jericho (a CAF poster)
Apotheoun
"Three realities pertain to God: essence, energy, and the triad of divine hypostaseis." St. Gregory Palamas
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Catholic
Jurisdiction: Melkite Catholic
Posts: 1,388


St. John Maximovitch


WWW
« Reply #401 on: October 10, 2013, 09:37:26 PM »

At the risk of going off on a tanget, have you ever read the paper "Roman Presidency and Christian Unity in our Time" (Woodstock Forum, September 25, 2005) by Father Thomas Hopko? Particularly this part:

Quote
He [the pope] would have to confirm the original text of the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Symbol of Faith and defend its use in all the churches, beginning with his own. At the very least (should some churches for pastoral reasons be permitted to keep the filioque in their creed), he would insist on an explanation that would clearly teach that the Holy Spirit “proceeds from the Son” only in relation to God’s saving dispensation in the world. He would make certain that no Christian be tempted to believe that the Holy Spirit essentially proceeds from the Father and the Son together, and certainly not “from both as from one" (ab utroque sicut ab uno).
Yeah, I read it years ago.
Logged

"All that the Father has belongs likewise to the Son, except Causality."
St. Gregory Nazianzen

"We should believe that divine grace is present in the icon of Christ and that it communicates sanctification to those who draw near with faith."
St. Theodore Studite
Tags:
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.161 seconds with 69 queries.