OrthodoxChristianity.net
April 23, 2014, 03:23:29 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: The Rules page has been updated.  Please familiarize yourself with its contents!
 
   Home   Help Calendar Contact Treasury Tags Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 »  All   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: NICAEA -- an inspiration epic movie in the making........  (Read 3958 times) Average Rating: 0
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Charles Martel
Traditional Roman Catholic
Warned
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Roman Catholic
Jurisdiction: New york
Posts: 2,767


« on: August 11, 2013, 09:18:38 PM »

Looking forward to the release of this one.

Always longed for a movie on Constantine the Great. Wink

NICAEA -- an inspiration epic movie in the making

Following in the tradition of Mel Gibson's ground breaking masterpiece, The Passion of Christ, the film Nicaea promises to be the second in what I hope will be a growing trend in the cinematic presentations of the divine and human drama of the 2000 year history of the Roman Catholic Church.

The Executive Producer and brainchild behind Nicaea is Catholic layman Charles Parlato, a former hedge fund manager and currently, a private investor. One March morning in 1991, he awoke with the idea of capturing the Council of Nicaea (325 A.D.), one of the major turning points in the history of Christianity, on film. It's been a long and difficult road, but Parlato is on the threshold of success.

With preliminary production tasks completed, the scheduling for the filming of Nicaea is set for early 2014 at the famed European Cinecitta Studios in Rome, site of the filming of Ben-Hur (1959) and The Passion (2004). Nicaea's distinguished production staff includes Rob Draper, Director, Enzo Sisti, Executive Producer for The Passion and Nicaea, and Francesco Frigeri – Design Producer for The Passion and Nicaea.
http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/engel/130808
Logged

Sancte Michael Archangele, defende nos in proelio, contra nequitiam et insidias diaboli esto praesidium.
Charles Martel
Traditional Roman Catholic
Warned
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Roman Catholic
Jurisdiction: New york
Posts: 2,767


« Reply #1 on: August 11, 2013, 09:20:10 PM »

Teaser Trailer here;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OagoV8wLNg
Logged

Sancte Michael Archangele, defende nos in proelio, contra nequitiam et insidias diaboli esto praesidium.
Charles Martel
Traditional Roman Catholic
Warned
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Roman Catholic
Jurisdiction: New york
Posts: 2,767


« Reply #2 on: August 11, 2013, 09:26:25 PM »

I posted this here because Constantine was a pivotal and controversial figure for all the major divisions within Christianity itself.

Good commentary on this aspect of the film here;

"While most Christians are acquainted with the Nicene Creed, the profession of the Christian Faith held by the Roman Catholic Church and common also to all Eastern Churches and major Protestant Denominations, details surrounding the First Ecumenical Council of Nicaea and its importance in the life of Christianity are not generally well known by the layman, especially the pivotal role played by Emperor Constantine and the almost unimaginable cast of characters ever assembled under one roof for an ecclesiastical event which would define and affirm the basic tenets of Christianity forever."

http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/engel/130808
Logged

Sancte Michael Archangele, defende nos in proelio, contra nequitiam et insidias diaboli esto praesidium.
ialmisry
There's nothing John of Damascus can't answer
Hypatos
*****************
Offline Offline

Faith: جامعي Arab confesssing the Orthodox Faith of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church
Jurisdiction: Antioch (for now), but my heart belongs to Alexandria
Posts: 35,626



« Reply #3 on: August 11, 2013, 10:18:02 PM »

I would want to know if this was another "Passion of the Christ" or a "DaVinci Code" production.
Logged

Question a friend, perhaps he did not do it; but if he did anything so that he may do it no more.
A hasty quarrel kindles fire,
and urgent strife sheds blood.
If you blow on a spark, it will glow;
if you spit on it, it will be put out;
                           and both come out of your mouth
Gamliel
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Greek Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Metropolis of San Francisco
Posts: 1,808



« Reply #4 on: August 12, 2013, 12:04:15 AM »

Me too ^.
Logged
88Devin12
Moderated
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 4,841



« Reply #5 on: August 12, 2013, 01:31:14 AM »

I really don't want to see any church history movies unless they are done by Orthodox.
Logged
NicholasMyra
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Antiochian/Greek
Posts: 5,632


Avowed denominationalist


« Reply #6 on: August 12, 2013, 01:39:07 AM »

This will probably never see theaters.
Logged

"...you are the orphan, not the protagonist."

-St. Seraphim of Vyritsa, 'This was from me'
JamesR
Warned
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: On-n-Off
Jurisdiction: OCA (the only truly Canonical American Orthodox Church)
Posts: 4,778


St. Augustine of Hippo pray for me!


« Reply #7 on: August 12, 2013, 02:22:12 AM »

lol "The Passion of Christ" and "masterpiece" in the same sentence.
Logged

Quote
Wherever goes JamesR goes, he is there.
-Orthonorm
Charles Martel
Traditional Roman Catholic
Warned
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Roman Catholic
Jurisdiction: New york
Posts: 2,767


« Reply #8 on: August 12, 2013, 06:56:31 AM »

I would want to know if this was another "Passion of the Christ" or a "DaVinci Code" production.
I'm thinking it's going to be more in line with the "Passion" since some of the same producers are working on this project as well, I don't know about Gibson's input so much right now. Hopefully we'll find out more soon about it.

At least the "Passion" was somewhat biblically accurate while the "DC" was pure fantasy and really outright blasphemy which no Christian should have supported or seen.

I'm really curious about their portrayal of Constantine, he such a pivotal historic and Christian figure, this movie will bring forth much controversy about the man in the same vain as "Alexander" did a few years ago. Although there will be none of the implications of the Emperor being a closet "homosexual" as they purported in the Alexander movie and a few other historical figures in the past.
Logged

Sancte Michael Archangele, defende nos in proelio, contra nequitiam et insidias diaboli esto praesidium.
Charles Martel
Traditional Roman Catholic
Warned
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Roman Catholic
Jurisdiction: New york
Posts: 2,767


« Reply #9 on: August 12, 2013, 07:02:44 AM »

This will probably never see theaters.
Hopefully you're wrong, but they will attack it and even try and prevent it's production if it is at all historically accurate or portrays the Christian Constantine in a positive light. Hollywood is virulently anti-Christian and is the Church is under continuous assault by it
Logged

Sancte Michael Archangele, defende nos in proelio, contra nequitiam et insidias diaboli esto praesidium.
Michał Kalina
Stratopedarches
**************
Offline Offline

Posts: 21,465


WWW
« Reply #10 on: August 12, 2013, 01:40:57 PM »

Hollywood is virulently anti-Christian and is the Church is under continuous assault by it

LOL.
Logged

Byzantinism
no longer posting here
Fabio Leite
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Posts: 2,498



WWW
« Reply #11 on: August 12, 2013, 01:59:48 PM »

I wonder if, in the case its succesful, we will see a sequel named "Constantinople" where they define a flioqueless Creed. Smiley

I have two "dream" cinematic projects I would finance if I had the millions.

One is a trilogy that would tell the story of the New Testament from the perspective of the feasts of the Church. The first movie would start with the Nativity of Theotokos up to the Nativity of Christ, the second would go up to the Crucification, and the third would be from Resurrection to the Dormition of the Theotokos. In terms of colors, we would nod to the symbology of colors for icons in people's dressing and predominance of colors in the scenario. Scenes from angels, transfiguration, everything eternal would be inspired directly from iconography.

The second is a Constantinopolitan Tetralogy: The first movie would be called Constantinople and would deal with the birth of the city, Constantine, Nicea and Constantinople I. The city is the main "character", and a fictional character from childhood to death would lead the story.  The second would be centered around Justinian and Theodora, the construction of Hagia Sophia and the City at its best. The third would be about the Latin occupation and the eventual recovery of Constantinople. The fourth about its Fall its influence on surrounding civilizations.
Logged

Many Energies, Three Persons, Two Natures, One God.
WPM
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,791



« Reply #12 on: August 12, 2013, 03:12:48 PM »

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs/news_from_elsewhere/

According to forum rules, you cannot just post a naked link.  Please explain the link, or quote a paragraph, as well as what this link has to do with the discussion.

Awaiting your reply to this thread.

Mina

August 13, 2013
« Last Edit: August 13, 2013, 07:36:28 PM by minasoliman » Logged
JamesR
Warned
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: On-n-Off
Jurisdiction: OCA (the only truly Canonical American Orthodox Church)
Posts: 4,778


St. Augustine of Hippo pray for me!


« Reply #13 on: August 12, 2013, 03:48:11 PM »

Probably another silly western Christian movie like The Passion of the Christ with an overemphasis on the Crucifixion and really nothing about the Resurrection.
Logged

Quote
Wherever goes JamesR goes, he is there.
-Orthonorm
Charles Martel
Traditional Roman Catholic
Warned
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Roman Catholic
Jurisdiction: New york
Posts: 2,767


« Reply #14 on: August 12, 2013, 04:05:46 PM »

Probably another silly western Christian movie like The Passion of the Christ with an overemphasis on the Crucifixion and really nothing about the Resurrection.
The Crucifixion of Christ can never be "overemphasized" in any medium if your a believer in the True Faith.


It is the pinnacle act  and the ulitmate sacrifice in human history.

It is not to be trivialized like the usual Hollywood sanitized version of just what the Messiah went through.

The Passion was anything but a "silly" movie.
Logged

Sancte Michael Archangele, defende nos in proelio, contra nequitiam et insidias diaboli esto praesidium.
Fabio Leite
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Posts: 2,498



WWW
« Reply #15 on: August 12, 2013, 04:13:11 PM »

Quote
It is the pinnacle act

Orthodoxy would disagree with that. The Resurrection is. The problem with movies about Christ is the extreme focus on the Crucifiction and putting the Resurrection as a side-note. The Passion is a great movie in making us remember that what Christ went through was terrible torture, but giving just a couple of seconds to the Resurrection puts the whole Christian message away.  The Good News is: "Christ is risen from the dead, trampling dow death by death, and upon those in the tombs bestowing life", not "Chris was crucified for us, taking our place as sacrifice to God". In this difference in focus, there is just so much different attitude.

Quote
and the ulitmate sacrifice in human history.

That it is, we agree.

Quote
It is not to be trivialized like the usual Hollywood sanitized version of just what the Messiah went through.

I agree with that as well, and I suppose Orthodoxy would support that.
« Last Edit: August 12, 2013, 04:13:51 PM by Fabio Leite » Logged

Many Energies, Three Persons, Two Natures, One God.
Charles Martel
Traditional Roman Catholic
Warned
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Roman Catholic
Jurisdiction: New york
Posts: 2,767


« Reply #16 on: August 12, 2013, 04:30:43 PM »

there is no Ressurection without Crucifixion.

Crucifixion is the ulimate act of love of a God for his creation.

That is why the Cross/Crucifix is the ultimate symbol of Christianity.
Logged

Sancte Michael Archangele, defende nos in proelio, contra nequitiam et insidias diaboli esto praesidium.
Asteriktos
Protostrator
***************
Online Online

Faith: Like an arrow to the knee
Posts: 27,293


Russians. Even when holding a cat they're dour.


« Reply #17 on: August 12, 2013, 04:33:53 PM »

There is also no crucifixion without the resurrection.

They should all be overemphasized and distorted beyond all sensible bounds (no sarcasm): incarnation, life (baptism, transfiguration, teachings, miracles, etc.), death, resurrection, ascension...
« Last Edit: August 12, 2013, 04:34:28 PM by Asteriktos » Logged
Agabus
The user formerly known as Agabus.
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Pan-American Colloquial Convert Hybrid Orthodoxy.
Jurisdiction: We are all uncanonical now.
Posts: 1,955



« Reply #18 on: August 12, 2013, 04:41:57 PM »

There is also no crucifixion without the resurrection.

They should all be overemphasized and distorted beyond all sensible bounds (no sarcasm): incarnation, life (baptism, transfiguration, teachings, miracles, etc.), death, resurrection, ascension...
Right on.

It is not as if we can give a weighted value to any of these events.
Logged

Blessed Nazarius practiced the ascetic life. His clothes were tattered. He wore his shoes without removing them for six years.

THE OPINIONS HERE MAY NOT REFLECT THE ACTUAL ORTHODOX CHURCH
Fabio Leite
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Posts: 2,498



WWW
« Reply #19 on: August 12, 2013, 04:54:08 PM »

I disagree with that.

Everything goes round the Resurrection.

In fact, some fathers say there would be the union of human nature and divine nature in Christ and therefore the deification of human nature that is the resurrection, even if we had not sinned.

The Crucifiction is a necessary remedial action to a problem that should not have happened: sin and death. But its preparatory. The relation of the Crucifiction to the Resurrection is the same to that of St. John, the Baptist, and Christ: one prepares the road for the other, one shouts contrition and humility *because* we have sinned (and wouldn't be there if we had not), the other is the Good News itself, that God so loves us that He even shares His own glory through us, making us co-sons with His Son. And like St. John before Christ, the Crucifiction must become a thing of the past for the Resurrection to come forward. The old things are left behind to give way to the new ones. There is a time when the Cross must decrease so the Eternal Light may shine.

The Evangelium, the Good News is this: Christ resurrected with all the implications about that, and not that Christ was crucified. The Crucification can *never* be the Good News, and much of the problem with vicarial soteriology is that it cultivates in us one of the pettiest, ugliest feelings ever: "Better him than me".

What the Resurrection achieves does not require the Crucifiction per se, but the Crucifction would not only be pointless without the Resurrection, it would be an outright defeat. We have to look at the sufferings of Christ with loving eyes, just like to any other suffering: with the desire they had not happened, with the faith that is not what God wished for humankind, that they were an innevitable evil that Jesus Himself wished not to be innevitable - for there is a difference between innevitable and necessary. The Cross was innevitable, not necessary.

 We must have in our hearts precisely that all the sufferings are nothing *in the light* of the resurrection, without which everything is meaningless, including the Cross. It's the Resurrection that fills everything with meaning, with light, it's the Resurrection that transfigures an instrument of death and torture into the Vivifying Holy Cross, the Tree of Life.

"And if Christ has not been raised, our preaching is useless and so is your faith."  1 Cor 15:14
« Last Edit: August 12, 2013, 05:03:55 PM by Fabio Leite » Logged

Many Energies, Three Persons, Two Natures, One God.
Asteriktos
Protostrator
***************
Online Online

Faith: Like an arrow to the knee
Posts: 27,293


Russians. Even when holding a cat they're dour.


« Reply #20 on: August 12, 2013, 05:03:10 PM »

I am reminded of something St. Justin Popovich said:

Quote
Therefore Nativity,  the day of the birth of the God-man, the Lord Jesus Christ, is the greatest and most important day in the history of all the worlds in which man moves and lives...

The God-man?--This is the most important Event in all the worlds of man: the Ultimate Event...

On account of all this, the Nativity of Christ is our only eternal joy: the Ultimate Joy. The Joy of all joys, the Joy above all joys. Therefore, again and again: Hristos se rodi! Christ is born! The God-man is born! Our deification is born! Our Divine-human transformation is born!

-- Man and God-Man

Now did St. Justin really mean these things to be taken in isolation? Is the nativity the greatest and most important day etc. etc.? Is it really our only eternal joy? St. Justin speaks in an exaggerated way--the way you do when you are in love and gush about your beloved. We would gush with exuberance and zeal beyond all propriety about everything Jesus did, if we knew what was good for us. Wouldn't we?
Logged
Asteriktos
Protostrator
***************
Online Online

Faith: Like an arrow to the knee
Posts: 27,293


Russians. Even when holding a cat they're dour.


« Reply #21 on: August 12, 2013, 05:04:06 PM »

"We preach Christ [insert activity or word here]" - St. Paul
Logged
Fabio Leite
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Posts: 2,498



WWW
« Reply #22 on: August 12, 2013, 05:08:35 PM »

What for was He born?
What for was He Crucified?
What for did He die?

The answer is always: for the Resurrection. It's the acomplishment of it all.

The preeminence of the Resurrection is marked in the Liturgical year as Easter is the Feast of Feast, above all the other Feasts, even above the 12 great Feasts, which include Christmas. Also, it's the only act of Christ that is celebrated every week, because it is the act of God par excellence.


I am reminded of something St. Justin Popovich said:

Quote
Therefore Nativity,  the day of the birth of the God-man, the Lord Jesus Christ, is the greatest and most important day in the history of all the worlds in which man moves and lives...

The God-man?--This is the most important Event in all the worlds of man: the Ultimate Event...

On account of all this, the Nativity of Christ is our only eternal joy: the Ultimate Joy. The Joy of all joys, the Joy above all joys. Therefore, again and again: Hristos se rodi! Christ is born! The God-man is born! Our deification is born! Our Divine-human transformation is born!

-- Man and God-Man

Now did St. Justin really mean these things to be taken in isolation? Is the nativity the greatest and most important day etc. etc.? Is it really our only eternal joy? St. Justin speaks in an exaggerated way--the way you do when you are in love and gush about your beloved. We would gush with exuberance and zeal beyond all propriety about everything Jesus did, if we knew what was good for us. Wouldn't we?
Logged

Many Energies, Three Persons, Two Natures, One God.
Fabio Leite
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Posts: 2,498



WWW
« Reply #23 on: August 12, 2013, 05:10:51 PM »

"We preach Christ [insert activity or word here]" - St. Paul

And all preaching is useless if ________.... Smiley

That's what Paul is saying, that even that is useless if the Resurrection had not happened. It's the act that make all the others have any meaning whatsoever. The Crucifiction, without the Resurrection, is just another act of stupid cruelty against an inocent person.
Logged

Many Energies, Three Persons, Two Natures, One God.
Cyrillic
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Christian
Jurisdiction: Moscow
Posts: 7,963


The Reactionary Rebel


WWW
« Reply #24 on: August 12, 2013, 05:11:26 PM »

Are we seriously arguing whether the Resurrection or the Crucifixion was more important?
Logged

Odi profanum vulgus et arceo

"J'ai pour les institutions démocratiques un goût de tête, mais je suis aristocrate par instinct"
-A. de Tocqueville

'Don't bother arguing with Cyrillic, he is Dutch or something queer like that.'
-Byron
Cyrillic
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Christian
Jurisdiction: Moscow
Posts: 7,963


The Reactionary Rebel


WWW
« Reply #25 on: August 12, 2013, 05:12:38 PM »

You keep spelling crucifixion as crucifiction. Are you saying that the crucifixion was a cruci-fictionTongue
Logged

Odi profanum vulgus et arceo

"J'ai pour les institutions démocratiques un goût de tête, mais je suis aristocrate par instinct"
-A. de Tocqueville

'Don't bother arguing with Cyrillic, he is Dutch or something queer like that.'
-Byron
Asteriktos
Protostrator
***************
Online Online

Faith: Like an arrow to the knee
Posts: 27,293


Russians. Even when holding a cat they're dour.


« Reply #26 on: August 12, 2013, 05:15:51 PM »

Are we seriously arguing whether the Resurrection or the Crucifixion was more important?

Not at all, they are both more important. Smiley
Logged
Fabio Leite
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Posts: 2,498



WWW
« Reply #27 on: August 12, 2013, 05:16:06 PM »

Are we seriously arguing whether the Resurrection or the Crucifixion was more important?

Yes, because it is hugely important. It's the difference between a morbid spirituality centered in the salvific power of suffering itself, or a spirituality that endures suffering because knows it's nothing compared to what lies ahead.

It's the difference between saying "it's good you're suffering" and in that become a cruel self-righteous person, or to really feel and even suffer along with those who suffer because you know there's nothing good in suffering itself.  No suffering, ever, is "good news". Not even Christ's.

Finally, it's also the difference between understanding that ascetic work is a means, not an end.
« Last Edit: August 12, 2013, 05:20:52 PM by Fabio Leite » Logged

Many Energies, Three Persons, Two Natures, One God.
Fabio Leite
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Posts: 2,498



WWW
« Reply #28 on: August 12, 2013, 05:17:10 PM »

You keep spelling crucifixion as crucifiction. Are you saying that the crucifixion was a cruci-fictionTongue

Sorry, some Portuguenglish slipping in there. Smiley
Logged

Many Energies, Three Persons, Two Natures, One God.
Michał Kalina
Stratopedarches
**************
Offline Offline

Posts: 21,465


WWW
« Reply #29 on: August 12, 2013, 05:17:51 PM »

I really like the explanations Fabio is posting here.
Logged

Byzantinism
no longer posting here
Mor Ephrem
"Mor is right, you are wrong." - Carl Kraeff
Section Moderator
Toumarches
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 12,082


I'm back, Mom...miss Me?


WWW
« Reply #30 on: August 12, 2013, 05:28:20 PM »

I really like the explanations Fabio is posting here.

I don't.  IMO, it's just the exchange of one unhealthy overemphasis for another.   

How can the Resurrection be isolated from the Crucifixion, and vice versa?  In the early Church, Pascha was the unitary celebration of both events.  As the calendar developed, the liturgical celebration was expanded over the days of Holy Week, and this is mimicked, among other ways, in the weekly commemoration of the Resurrection on Sundays and the Crucifixion on Fridays.  So we "separate" the two events in our minds, but they are at heart one mystery and one activity of the one Christ.         
Logged

"Best of all, Mor Ephrem won't trap you into having his baby." - dzheremi

"Mor Ephrim will not be allowed in(to the getes of heaven) because God doesnt know him." - Cackles

"You are consistently one of the cruelest posters on this forum." - William
Mor Ephrem
"Mor is right, you are wrong." - Carl Kraeff
Section Moderator
Toumarches
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 12,082


I'm back, Mom...miss Me?


WWW
« Reply #31 on: August 12, 2013, 06:30:53 PM »

Hi Fabio,

I felt I ought to flesh out my earlier comments to Michal in response to this post.  I don't want it to seem like I'm being contrary for the sake of being contrary.  Smiley

I disagree with that.

Everything goes round the Resurrection.

In fact, some fathers say there would be the union of human nature and divine nature in Christ and therefore the deification of human nature that is the resurrection, even if we had not sinned.

As I said in my earlier post, and as others have noted, I don't think it is theologically sound to separate the Crucifixion and the Resurrection as if they are separate things.  I believe, even in these words, and throughout your post, that you are separating them so much as to distort their meaning.  

The Resurrection is not identical to the deification of human nature.  Through the Incarnation, the Son assumes human nature.  Human nature is deified through the Son's Incarnation, and the Incarnation is not simply the conception in the womb of the Theotokos, but is more dynamic.  Christ enters every stage of human life, including death and resurrection, and endows it with his divine grace.  You don't "need" a Resurrection to accomplish the deification of human nature if sin and death are not part of the picture, so even if the Fathers teach that Christ would've become man without sin, how does the Resurrection factor in?  The Fathers teach that Christ would've become man, but whence Resurrection without death?  

Quote
The Crucifiction is a necessary remedial action to a problem that should not have happened: sin and death. But its preparatory. The relation of the Crucifiction to the Resurrection is the same to that of St. John, the Baptist, and Christ: one prepares the road for the other, one shouts contrition and humility *because* we have sinned (and wouldn't be there if we had not), the other is the Good News itself, that God so loves us that He even shares His own glory through us, making us co-sons with His Son. And like St. John before Christ, the Crucifiction must become a thing of the past for the Resurrection to come forward. The old things are left behind to give way to the new ones. There is a time when the Cross must decrease so the Eternal Light may shine.

The comparison of the Crucifixion/Resurrection to John the Baptist/Christ is a distortion.  The Crucifixion is not simply a necessary remedial action whose time has come and gone (or, for that matter, some didactic example encouraging us to contrition and humility).  It is only that if you accept the "Western" distortion that it is simply the required paying of a debt.  The Scriptures speak of the idea of debt and ransom, so they are not absent from our teaching on the Crucifixion, but this is not exclusively its importance.  

St Paul "preaches Christ crucified" (I Cor. 1.23), glories "in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ" (Gal. 6.14), has himself "been crucified with Christ" and lives by faith in the Son of God "who gave himself up" for him (cf. Gal. 2.20).  Christ is the Lamb "slain from the foundation of the world" (Rev. 13.8 ), who offered one sacrifice for sins perpetually/continuously (cf. Heb. 10.12).  When he is raised from death, he retains the wounds of his Crucifixion, and it is through these that he is known to us (cf. Jn 20.27).  The NT is always talking about the Crucifixion, and in ways that exceed the importance you appear to assign to it.  If you accept as a given the distorted idea of the Crucifixion as the bloody victimisation of a substitute, then sure, an emphasis on the Resurrection may help correct for this.  But don't emasculate the Crucifixion.  Really, it can't be understood without the Resurrection, nor can the Resurrection be understood or accomplished without the Crucifixion.  

Frankly, the idea that "the Cross must decrease so that the Eternal Light may shine" is ludicrous:

Quote
Having beheld the Resurrection of Christ, let us worship the holy Lord Jesus, the only sinless One. We venerate your Cross, O Christ, and we praise and glorify your holy Resurrection; for you are our God and we know no other than you and we call upon your Name. Come all you faithful, let us venerate Christ's holy Resurrection, for behold through the Cross joy has come into all the world. Let us ever bless the Lord, praising his Resurrection, for enduring the Cross for us, he has destroyed death by death.

It is precisely upon seeing Christ die on the Cross that the centurion confesses him to be the Son of God (cf. Mt. 27.54).  The titulus above the Cross in icons of the Crucifixion reads "The King of Glory" not simply in light of the Resurrection, but because Christ's divinity, his kingdom, his power, his glory are all revealed on the Cross.  That is why it is the sign of the Son of Man that will appear in the heavens at his Second Coming.  The Crucifixion is not just a prelude to the Resurrection: the Resurrection confirms the message of the Cross.  They can't be properly understood apart from each other.  

That's why they are always linked in the Church's liturgy.  The Sunday commemoration of the Resurrection is not separated from the Cross, either on the day itself or in the context of the week, because every Friday is the commemoration of the Cross.  The Cross and Resurrection are obviously linked closely together in Holy Week and the Paschal season, and were once celebrated together on Pascha itself, and not separately.  Even our celebration of the feast of the Transfiguration is such that its dating occurs not within the "life of Christ" cycle of feasts, but forty days before September's feast of the Cross, so that neither the Cross nor the glory of deified humanity is considered "on its own", but in relation to each other.      

Quote
The Evangelium, the Good News is this: Christ resurrected with all the implications about that, and not that Christ was crucified. The Crucification can *never* be the Good News, and much of the problem with vicarial soteriology is that it cultivates in us one of the pettiest, ugliest feelings ever: "Better him than me".

But again, one of those implications is his death.  If you insist on identifying the Crucifixion with "vicarial soteriology", then you may be right; but the Church, following Scripture, doesn't do it the way you're doing it.  

I chose not to respond to the rest of that post because I thought I'd be repeating myself too much, and I fear I may have already done so.  
« Last Edit: August 12, 2013, 06:33:08 PM by Mor Ephrem » Logged

"Best of all, Mor Ephrem won't trap you into having his baby." - dzheremi

"Mor Ephrim will not be allowed in(to the getes of heaven) because God doesnt know him." - Cackles

"You are consistently one of the cruelest posters on this forum." - William
Charles Martel
Traditional Roman Catholic
Warned
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Roman Catholic
Jurisdiction: New york
Posts: 2,767


« Reply #32 on: August 13, 2013, 07:26:54 AM »

There is also no crucifixion without the resurrection.

They should all be overemphasized and distorted beyond all sensible bounds (no sarcasm): incarnation, life (baptism, transfiguration, teachings, miracles, etc.), death, resurrection, ascension...
That deosn't even make sense.

The Passion and death of our Lord had to come first.

I agree with the overemphasized thing.
Logged

Sancte Michael Archangele, defende nos in proelio, contra nequitiam et insidias diaboli esto praesidium.
Charles Martel
Traditional Roman Catholic
Warned
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Roman Catholic
Jurisdiction: New york
Posts: 2,767


« Reply #33 on: August 13, 2013, 07:59:40 AM »

Quote
Orthodoxy would disagree with that.
Why would they? Is there liturgy centered on the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass like it is in the Latin Rite? Maybe I'm wrong about that.(your liturgy that is)

Quote
. The Resurrection is. The problem with movies about Christ is the extreme focus on the Crucifiction and putting the Resurrection as a side-note.
Because they're is supposed to be an "extreme focus" on the fact that the God of this universe would actually  lower himself and become a man and go through the Passion and Crucifixion so that there could be Salvation and Resurrection for us all.

The Resurrection is equally important, but Christ under goes the most difficult task first, to suffer,tortured, beaten, mocked and nailed to a Cross and Lifted Up so all the world can see his Sacrifice for his beloved creation. And the hardest part was to Become Sin itself, this was extremely difficult for a Being that cannot sin but actually take upon the sins of the world, an amazing concept that to me is unfathomable to this day. The Crucifixion and Death of our Lord was such a stressful thought and horror that he actually sweated drops of blood in the Agony in the Garden and asked the Father Himself if it was any way possible to avoid this Cup but agreed that his Will be done in the end.


The thought of the  Crucixion and the symbol of the Crucifix is so powerful, it is the main reason why I remain a Christian.


The concept of God Resurrecting himself is an easy one compared to subjecting himself to the Crucifixion.
Logged

Sancte Michael Archangele, defende nos in proelio, contra nequitiam et insidias diaboli esto praesidium.
john_mo
Elder
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Antioch
Posts: 369



« Reply #34 on: August 13, 2013, 09:01:46 AM »

I'm not down with the negativity towards this.  This looks promising and I hope it can live up to the momentum of the trailer... actually it's more of a concept trailer. 

People who see this might be forced to learn about Byzantium and Orthodoxy.
Logged
Asteriktos
Protostrator
***************
Online Online

Faith: Like an arrow to the knee
Posts: 27,293


Russians. Even when holding a cat they're dour.


« Reply #35 on: August 13, 2013, 09:09:21 AM »

There is also no crucifixion without the resurrection.

They should all be overemphasized and distorted beyond all sensible bounds (no sarcasm): incarnation, life (baptism, transfiguration, teachings, miracles, etc.), death, resurrection, ascension...
That deosn't even make sense.

The Passion and death of our Lord had to come first.

I agree with the overemphasized thing.

Jesus Christ was the image of God, and man was the image of Christ, thus we are the image of the image. Jesus is the archetype, and Adam was based on Jesus, not vice versa, even though Jesus came later in terms of linear time. God foreknew what would happen. The crucifixion, resurrection, incarnation, etc.--all of that is a package deal. It isn't like God was sitting waiting to see what happened as Jesus lived his life. God already knew what would happen, from before time began. It was all part of the work of God. You are correct that if we were going by linear time that what I said doesn't make sense. However, I did not mean to be talking in that way, but rather I was speaking of that which had to be done to fulfill the will of God. Thus to say that there could have been a crucifixion without a resurrection, or vice versa, are both getting away from what I was trying to say. That's where I'm coming from, anyway.
« Last Edit: August 13, 2013, 09:13:16 AM by Asteriktos » Logged
Charles Martel
Traditional Roman Catholic
Warned
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Roman Catholic
Jurisdiction: New york
Posts: 2,767


« Reply #36 on: August 13, 2013, 09:57:28 AM »

Quote
Jesus Christ was the image of God,
Not sure I agree with this. Jesus is the third Person of the Trinity, not the "image" of anyone of the Godhead, while he did have a human nature and appearence while down on earth, he was still having the nature of God as well. that's why refer to him as True God and True Man.

Quote
man was the image of Christ
Yes. as a human being I suppose.

Quote
thus we are the image of the image.
I can also agree with that if it keeps in line on how we were created in "The image and likeness" of God.

But we are not anyway part of the Divine himself.
Logged

Sancte Michael Archangele, defende nos in proelio, contra nequitiam et insidias diaboli esto praesidium.
Asteriktos
Protostrator
***************
Online Online

Faith: Like an arrow to the knee
Posts: 27,293


Russians. Even when holding a cat they're dour.


« Reply #37 on: August 13, 2013, 09:59:50 AM »

I was thinking of:

"The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation." - Col. 1:15

"The god of this age has blinded the minds of unbelievers, so that they cannot see the light of the gospel that displays the glory of Christ, who is the image of God." - 2 Cor. 4:4
Logged
Cyrillic
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Christian
Jurisdiction: Moscow
Posts: 7,963


The Reactionary Rebel


WWW
« Reply #38 on: August 13, 2013, 10:02:57 AM »

Quote
Jesus Christ was the image of God,
Not sure I agree with this. Jesus is the third Person of the Trinity, not the "image" of anyone of the Godhead

Asteriktos is, I think, referring to Hebrews 1:3

"ὃς ὢν ἀπαύγασμα τῆς δόξης καὶ χαρακτὴρ τῆς ὑποστάσεως αὐτοῦ" - "Who, being the radiance of glory and the image of His hypostasis etc."

Edit: oh well, he clarified it himself
« Last Edit: August 13, 2013, 10:03:30 AM by Cyrillic » Logged

Odi profanum vulgus et arceo

"J'ai pour les institutions démocratiques un goût de tête, mais je suis aristocrate par instinct"
-A. de Tocqueville

'Don't bother arguing with Cyrillic, he is Dutch or something queer like that.'
-Byron
Carl Kraeff (Second Chance)
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 6,182



« Reply #39 on: August 13, 2013, 10:05:50 AM »

I really don't want to see any church history movies unless they are done by Orthodox.

Probably the best book on Saint Constantine the Great is by a Protestant. Check out Defending Constantine by Peter Leithart and then we will talk, OK?
Logged

Michal: "SC, love you in this thread."
Asteriktos
Protostrator
***************
Online Online

Faith: Like an arrow to the knee
Posts: 27,293


Russians. Even when holding a cat they're dour.


« Reply #40 on: August 13, 2013, 10:06:36 AM »

Quote
Jesus Christ was the image of God,
Not sure I agree with this. Jesus is the third Person of the Trinity, not the "image" of anyone of the Godhead

Asteriktos is, I think, referring to Hebrews 1:3

"ὃς ὢν ἀπαύγασμα τῆς δόξης καὶ χαρακτὴρ τῆς ὑποστάσεως αὐτοῦ" - "Who, being the radiance of glory and the image of His hypostasis etc."

Edit: oh well, he clarified it himself

Gah, forgot about that one, thanks Smiley
Logged
Charles Martel
Traditional Roman Catholic
Warned
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Roman Catholic
Jurisdiction: New york
Posts: 2,767


« Reply #41 on: August 13, 2013, 10:12:56 AM »

I'm not down with the negativity towards this.  This looks promising and I hope it can live up to the momentum of the trailer... actually it's more of a concept trailer.  

People who see this might be forced to learn about Byzantium and Orthodoxy.
That is a good point.

I remember when I was very young how when the Excorcist first came on the scene and how frightful it was for even many nonbelievers and lukewarm Christians and forced them a little to search into really what they believe, the reality of the demonic and what they have to do as a consequence of it. Even though the film "overemphasized" the power of the devil and used a lot of ridiculous Hollywood tricks in it's production, it still became a real thing to many people and forced them to start asking questions about their faith.

I think in a opposite kind of way, so did the Davinci Code which was actually an attempt by the atheists to subvert the basic tenants of Christianity and Christ's divinity, but for any real doubters out there who drank the kool-aid of that movie who did any real research on that "saga" of Dan Brown's book would see it for the fraud that it is. There are more than several Catholic sources that throughly debunk "the Code" as fantasy if not outright slam it as a fallacious blasphemy.

For may of these religious movies, even ones that attempt to rail against the Church seem to have an opposite  of the desired effect.


Then you have movies like The Passion
where they tried to bury it during production and dismiss and mock it as a joke and "antisemitic" because it is biblically accurate, then goes on to become a huge box office hit.

They cannot suppress the Truth no matter how hard they try.
« Last Edit: August 13, 2013, 10:14:40 AM by Charles Martel » Logged

Sancte Michael Archangele, defende nos in proelio, contra nequitiam et insidias diaboli esto praesidium.
WPM
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,791



« Reply #42 on: August 14, 2013, 10:44:03 AM »

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs/news_from_elsewhere/

According to forum rules, you cannot just post a naked link.  Please explain the link, or quote a paragraph, as well as what this link has to do with the discussion.

Awaiting your reply to this thread.

Mina

August 13, 2013



Its an article about the Artist's depiction of a Monkey Christ - in Spain. Just a BBC news article

Thank you WPM! Much appreciated. Curious to know what does this have to do with the topic of the Nicea movie?

Mina

August 14, 2013
« Last Edit: August 14, 2013, 01:21:39 PM by minasoliman » Logged
WPM
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,791



« Reply #43 on: August 14, 2013, 10:46:23 AM »

Looking forward to the release of this one.

Always longed for a movie on Constantine the Great. Wink

NICAEA -- an inspiration epic movie in the making

Following in the tradition of Mel Gibson's ground breaking masterpiece, The Passion of Christ, the film Nicaea promises to be the second in what I hope will be a growing trend in the cinematic presentations of the divine and human drama of the 2000 year history of the Roman Catholic Church.

The Executive Producer and brainchild behind Nicaea is Catholic layman Charles Parlato, a former hedge fund manager and currently, a private investor. One March morning in 1991, he awoke with the idea of capturing the Council of Nicaea (325 A.D.), one of the major turning points in the history of Christianity, on film. It's been a long and difficult road, but Parlato is on the threshold of success.

With preliminary production tasks completed, the scheduling for the filming of Nicaea is set for early 2014 at the famed European Cinecitta Studios in Rome, site of the filming of Ben-Hur (1959) and The Passion (2004). Nicaea's distinguished production staff includes Rob Draper, Director, Enzo Sisti, Executive Producer for The Passion and Nicaea, and Francesco Frigeri – Design Producer for The Passion and Nicaea.
http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/engel/130808



I'm a big fan of classic films like Moses and 10 commandments and other Bible stories filmed on the Panorama screen.
« Last Edit: August 14, 2013, 10:48:11 AM by WPM » Logged
Charles Martel
Traditional Roman Catholic
Warned
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Roman Catholic
Jurisdiction: New york
Posts: 2,767


« Reply #44 on: August 14, 2013, 11:10:49 AM »

Heston was awesome in his portrayl of Moses in the TC.........

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IB6T_Pkg_Vs

And tell me, could there be a better Ramses than Yul Brynner?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yu-u6PwFfLA
Logged

Sancte Michael Archangele, defende nos in proelio, contra nequitiam et insidias diaboli esto praesidium.
Tags:
Pages: 1 2 »  All   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.144 seconds with 72 queries.