Peter, obviously you know little or nothing about logic. You asserted that statistics can be made to lie, implying that the statistics I gave are open to question.
Yes, that's a legitimate logical rebuttal.
But since you made this assertion, the burden of proof is on you.
Sorry, Charlie. That's not the way logic works.
Cite me a source proving anything contrary to the source I gave.
I don't need to. All I need to do is give generally accepted reasons why the one source you gave can be reasonably doubted.
1. It's a youtube video. Anyone can post anything on youtube.
2. Facts and statistics can be misused, or even fabricated by anyone to prove any point.
You have given nothing, only assertion.
I haven't even given you that. I've only given you good reasons why you need to cite more sources than just one to prove your point.