Author Topic: Autocephaly problem: history and present  (Read 283 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline orthoreader

  • Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 476
Autocephaly problem: history and present
« on: July 17, 2013, 12:14:27 PM »
I found this lecture by Fr. John Erickson pretty interesting and wished to share it. He talks pretty openly about teaching on Autocephaly and a future Council.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaFhJGj1kh4&feature=youtu.be


Offline 88Devin12

  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 5,143
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Antioch
Re: Autocephaly problem: history and present
« Reply #1 on: July 17, 2013, 01:04:59 PM »
I found this lecture by Fr. John Erickson pretty interesting and wished to share it. He talks pretty openly about teaching on Autocephaly and a future Council.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaFhJGj1kh4&feature=youtu.be



I'll have to check that out!

Honestly, I think it should be a system that only Autocephalous Patriarchates can grant Autocephaly. But historically, from what I've seen, it is quite vague. Many have unilaterally declared autocephaly or autonomy, which leads to a schism, which is later repaired and autocephaly is granted anyway later. So for them it could be debated whether it came from the unilateral act, or the official recognition.

I know today that many Orthodox Churches, at least here in America, commune Macedonian Orthodox, recognizing that the schism is political and just having to do with autocephaly vs. autonomy.

Offline Mor Ephrem

  • The Fourteenth Apostle and Judge of the Interwebs
  • Section Moderator
  • Stratopedarches
  • *****
  • Posts: 19,949
    • OrthodoxChristianity.net
Re: Autocephaly problem: history and present
« Reply #2 on: July 17, 2013, 01:19:04 PM »
Awww, Erickson!  A wonderful man.  I look forward to watching this. 
"Do not tempt the Mor thy Mod."

Offline orthoreader

  • Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 476
Re: Autocephaly problem: history and present
« Reply #3 on: July 17, 2013, 01:27:38 PM »
Yes Fr. John is great!

This is actually the second time I've heard the notion that there was a period in the Church's history that Autocephaly was not granted just occurred and that it wasn't used as a means for hegemony.

Makes me think that with some of these 'pending' Churches that an EC should just pull an ecclesiastical-audit to see if they're working within the canons and then just grant a sweeping autocephaly for all of them so they can start working things out Eucharistically.

Offline orthoreader

  • Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 476
Re: Autocephaly problem: history and present
« Reply #4 on: July 17, 2013, 01:29:40 PM »
I found this lecture by Fr. John Erickson pretty interesting and wished to share it. He talks pretty openly about teaching on Autocephaly and a future Council.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaFhJGj1kh4&feature=youtu.be



I'll have to check that out!

Honestly, I think it should be a system that only Autocephalous Patriarchates can grant Autocephaly. But historically, from what I've seen, it is quite vague. Many have unilaterally declared autocephaly or autonomy, which leads to a schism, which is later repaired and autocephaly is granted anyway later. So for them it could be debated whether it came from the unilateral act, or the official recognition.

I know today that many Orthodox Churches, at least here in America, commune Macedonian Orthodox, recognizing that the schism is political and just having to do with autocephaly vs. autonomy.

I know that most Macedonian Orthodox have been treated with the greatest of respect in NA. I also have knowledge that the MOC's mysteries are not in question.

Online ialmisry

  • There's nothing John of Damascus can't answer
  • Hypatos
  • *****************
  • Posts: 38,391
Re: Autocephaly problem: history and present
« Reply #5 on: July 17, 2013, 01:51:43 PM »
I found this lecture by Fr. John Erickson pretty interesting and wished to share it. He talks pretty openly about teaching on Autocephaly and a future Council.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaFhJGj1kh4&feature=youtu.be



"...related not as parts of a whole but on the principle of mutual identity..."
THAT's it!
Question a friend, perhaps he did not do it; but if he did anything so that he may do it no more.
A hasty quarrel kindles fire,
and urgent strife sheds blood.
If you blow on a spark, it will glow;
if you spit on it, it will be put out;
                           and both come out of your mouth