OrthodoxChristianity.net
October 02, 2014, 12:23:13 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Reminder: No political discussions in the public fora.  If you do not have access to the private Politics Forum, please send a PM to Fr. George.
 
   Home   Help Calendar Contact Treasury Tags Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Looks like ROCOR will dismantle its WR  (Read 21107 times) Average Rating: 0
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
TheTrisagion
Armed Feline rider of Flaming Unicorns
Merarches
***********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Antiochian
Posts: 8,362



« Reply #315 on: July 26, 2013, 01:59:15 PM »

When they stop being schematics and accept God is both fully God and fully man.

Mor,
I had no idea you were a schematic.

« Last Edit: July 26, 2013, 02:00:02 PM by TheTrisagion » Logged

Have you considered the possibility that your face is an ad hominem?
Somebody just went all Jack Chick up in here.
Alpo
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Jerkodox
Posts: 6,801



« Reply #316 on: July 26, 2013, 02:10:03 PM »

^That seems like a fairly accurate description of Orthodox ecclesiastical politics.
Logged

Mor Ephrem
"Mor is right, you are wrong."
Section Moderator
Hoplitarches
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 17,415


The Pope Emeritus reading OCNet


WWW
« Reply #317 on: July 26, 2013, 02:13:36 PM »

When they stop being schematics and accept God is both fully God and fully man.

God is fully God.  God is not fully man or even part man, he's not man at all.  

Jesus Christ, the Only-Begotten Son and Immortal Word of God (as St Severus of Antioch wrote of him in his hymn which you sing at every Divine Liturgy), is fully God and fully man, having become incarnate by the Holy Spirit and the Virgin Mary, the Theotokos.  Thus we all teach, and thus we all believe, and it's all there for the world to see.  

But that wasn't even my point: as I made clear in subsequent posts, my comment was more directed to the idea that "Orthodoxy" is "not Western".  Your brand of Orthodoxy is Western through and through, but you (and people who think like you, of which there are many) don't see or care to admit that.  Orthodoxy ≠ Eastern.  That's all.

And next time, get your theology (and vocabulary) straight.    
« Last Edit: July 26, 2013, 02:14:01 PM by Mor Ephrem » Logged

Apolytikion, Tone 1, by Antonis

An eloquent crafter of divine posts
And an inheritor of the line of the Baptist
A righteous son of India
And a new apostle to the internet
O Holy Mor Ephrem,
Intercede for us, that our forum may be saved.


"Mor is a jerk." - kelly
Romaios
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Romanian
Posts: 2,933



« Reply #318 on: July 26, 2013, 02:18:14 PM »

Jesus Christ, the Only-Begotten Son and Immortal Word of God (as St Severus of Antioch wrote of him in his hymn which you sing at every Divine Liturgy)

We attribute the O monogenes to Emperor Justinian.  Wink
Logged
Peacemaker
Elder
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 469



« Reply #319 on: July 26, 2013, 02:18:25 PM »

When they stop being schematics and accept God is both fully God and fully man.

Mor,
I had no idea you were a schematic.



HAHAHA  Cheesy  gotta love auto spell check


also, Jesus Christ is God, so how can Jesus be something that God isn't if they are both the same?
Logged

"If you die before you die, you will not die when you die"
Mor Ephrem
"Mor is right, you are wrong."
Section Moderator
Hoplitarches
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 17,415


The Pope Emeritus reading OCNet


WWW
« Reply #320 on: July 26, 2013, 02:18:47 PM »

Jesus Christ, the Only-Begotten Son and Immortal Word of God (as St Severus of Antioch wrote of him in his hymn which you sing at every Divine Liturgy)

We attribute the O monogenes to Emperor Justinian.  Wink

You would.  Wink
Logged

Apolytikion, Tone 1, by Antonis

An eloquent crafter of divine posts
And an inheritor of the line of the Baptist
A righteous son of India
And a new apostle to the internet
O Holy Mor Ephrem,
Intercede for us, that our forum may be saved.


"Mor is a jerk." - kelly
Mor Ephrem
"Mor is right, you are wrong."
Section Moderator
Hoplitarches
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 17,415


The Pope Emeritus reading OCNet


WWW
« Reply #321 on: July 26, 2013, 02:19:38 PM »

also, Jesus Christ is God, so how can Jesus be something that God isn't if they are both the same?

Oh, my friend, that's a different thread. 
Logged

Apolytikion, Tone 1, by Antonis

An eloquent crafter of divine posts
And an inheritor of the line of the Baptist
A righteous son of India
And a new apostle to the internet
O Holy Mor Ephrem,
Intercede for us, that our forum may be saved.


"Mor is a jerk." - kelly
TheTrisagion
Armed Feline rider of Flaming Unicorns
Merarches
***********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Antiochian
Posts: 8,362



« Reply #322 on: July 26, 2013, 02:21:23 PM »

When they stop being schematics and accept God is both fully God and fully man.

Mor,
I had no idea you were a schematic.


HAHAHA  Cheesy  gotta love auto spell check


also, Jesus Christ is God, so how can Jesus be something that God isn't if they are both the same?
Jesus is a person of the Trinity.  God the Father is not a man, the Holy Spirit is not a man, so you can't say that God is a man.  Only one of the three persons of God is incarnate.
Logged

Have you considered the possibility that your face is an ad hominem?
Somebody just went all Jack Chick up in here.
Mor Ephrem
"Mor is right, you are wrong."
Section Moderator
Hoplitarches
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 17,415


The Pope Emeritus reading OCNet


WWW
« Reply #323 on: July 26, 2013, 02:29:23 PM »

Jesus is a person of the Trinity.  God the Father is not a man, the Holy Spirit is not a man, so you can't say that God is a man.  Only one of the three persons of God is incarnate.

I'm pretty sure I've seen a schematic for that.  Wink
Logged

Apolytikion, Tone 1, by Antonis

An eloquent crafter of divine posts
And an inheritor of the line of the Baptist
A righteous son of India
And a new apostle to the internet
O Holy Mor Ephrem,
Intercede for us, that our forum may be saved.


"Mor is a jerk." - kelly
TheTrisagion
Armed Feline rider of Flaming Unicorns
Merarches
***********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Antiochian
Posts: 8,362



« Reply #324 on: July 26, 2013, 02:31:34 PM »

Jesus is a person of the Trinity.  God the Father is not a man, the Holy Spirit is not a man, so you can't say that God is a man.  Only one of the three persons of God is incarnate.

I'm pretty sure I've seen a schematic for that.  Wink
For you schematically minded individuals...  Grin

« Last Edit: July 26, 2013, 02:32:17 PM by TheTrisagion » Logged

Have you considered the possibility that your face is an ad hominem?
Somebody just went all Jack Chick up in here.
Mor Ephrem
"Mor is right, you are wrong."
Section Moderator
Hoplitarches
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 17,415


The Pope Emeritus reading OCNet


WWW
« Reply #325 on: July 26, 2013, 02:37:21 PM »

I tried to imagine how to make such a schematic that would incorporate "Man" along with "ises" and "is nots", in order to help explain that aspect better, and my head started moving along the lines of the tetrahedron I imagined.  My neck hurts. 
Logged

Apolytikion, Tone 1, by Antonis

An eloquent crafter of divine posts
And an inheritor of the line of the Baptist
A righteous son of India
And a new apostle to the internet
O Holy Mor Ephrem,
Intercede for us, that our forum may be saved.


"Mor is a jerk." - kelly
TheTrisagion
Armed Feline rider of Flaming Unicorns
Merarches
***********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Antiochian
Posts: 8,362



« Reply #326 on: July 26, 2013, 02:41:40 PM »

I tried to imagine how to make such a schematic that would incorporate "Man" along with "ises" and "is nots", in order to help explain that aspect better, and my head started moving along the lines of the tetrahedron I imagined.  My neck hurts. 
I think you need a cantellated tesseract for that.

Logged

Have you considered the possibility that your face is an ad hominem?
Somebody just went all Jack Chick up in here.
Mor Ephrem
"Mor is right, you are wrong."
Section Moderator
Hoplitarches
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 17,415


The Pope Emeritus reading OCNet


WWW
« Reply #327 on: July 26, 2013, 02:43:16 PM »

My mind is blown.  Thank you. 
Logged

Apolytikion, Tone 1, by Antonis

An eloquent crafter of divine posts
And an inheritor of the line of the Baptist
A righteous son of India
And a new apostle to the internet
O Holy Mor Ephrem,
Intercede for us, that our forum may be saved.


"Mor is a jerk." - kelly
TheTrisagion
Armed Feline rider of Flaming Unicorns
Merarches
***********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Antiochian
Posts: 8,362



« Reply #328 on: July 26, 2013, 02:52:14 PM »

My mind is blown.  Thank you. 
But it should be so obvious now.  I think that it brings so much clarity to the subject.  laugh
Logged

Have you considered the possibility that your face is an ad hominem?
Somebody just went all Jack Chick up in here.
Peacemaker
Elder
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 469



« Reply #329 on: July 26, 2013, 04:26:19 PM »

Yes this makes since, I should have said Jesus instead of God. Still, my point being, I would never join the non chalcedonians because they are not in communion with the one and only true Church because of their heretical beliefs, non chalcedonians are not orthodox, just as Roman Catholics aren't Orthodox, how can you be if you are not in the Church, the Church is not divided, there are only those who are divided from the Church. With that said, not liking the western rite is one thing, but being a non Orthodox, thanks for the offer but not in this life time.  #Rant

At any rate, back on topic
Logged

"If you die before you die, you will not die when you die"
Mor Ephrem
"Mor is right, you are wrong."
Section Moderator
Hoplitarches
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 17,415


The Pope Emeritus reading OCNet


WWW
« Reply #330 on: July 26, 2013, 04:39:39 PM »

Still, my point being, I would never join the non chalcedonians because they are not in communion with the one and only true Church because of their heretical beliefs, non chalcedonians are not orthodox, just as Roman Catholics aren't Orthodox, how can you be if you are not in the Church, the Church is not divided, there are only those who are divided from the Church.

Yes, there are only those who are divided from the Church, like the Chalcedonians, who left the communion of the one and only true Church (which has remained in God's peace and unity ever since) in order to wed themselves to earthly power, imperial and papal.  Since their schism in the fifth century, the Chalcedonians have divided repeatedly, first into so-called Eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholics, and then divided further: Old Ritualists, Old Calendarists, "the Living Church", etc. on the EO side and Protestantism, Pentecostalism, Jehovah's Witnesses/Mormons, SSPX, SSPV, etc. on the RC side.  Schism is the mother of schism, and yours is a great-great-great grandma by now.  Hers is a "beautiful" family.  #givemeabreak   

Really, you'll need to work on your material.  I don't mind if you don't agree with us, but you should have better reasons.  Not one word of what I described as our faith ought to be disagreeable to you--in fact, I corrected your own statements.  But if you're going to curse the truth because "the other guys" believe it, you've got more serious issues. 

Logged

Apolytikion, Tone 1, by Antonis

An eloquent crafter of divine posts
And an inheritor of the line of the Baptist
A righteous son of India
And a new apostle to the internet
O Holy Mor Ephrem,
Intercede for us, that our forum may be saved.


"Mor is a jerk." - kelly
TheTrisagion
Armed Feline rider of Flaming Unicorns
Merarches
***********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Antiochian
Posts: 8,362



« Reply #331 on: July 26, 2013, 05:02:00 PM »

But how boring the world would be if we did not have ideologues to tell us how wrong everyone else is!  Wink
Logged

Have you considered the possibility that your face is an ad hominem?
Somebody just went all Jack Chick up in here.
Peacemaker
Elder
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 469



« Reply #332 on: July 26, 2013, 05:20:06 PM »

Still, my point being, I would never join the non chalcedonians because they are not in communion with the one and only true Church because of their heretical beliefs, non chalcedonians are not orthodox, just as Roman Catholics aren't Orthodox, how can you be if you are not in the Church, the Church is not divided, there are only those who are divided from the Church.

Yes, there are only those who are divided from the Church, like the Chalcedonians, who left the communion of the one and only true Church (which has remained in God's peace and unity ever since) in order to wed themselves to earthly power, imperial and papal.  Since their schism in the fifth century, the Chalcedonians have divided repeatedly, first into so-called Eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholics, and then divided further: Old Ritualists, Old Calendarists, "the Living Church", etc. on the EO side and Protestantism, Pentecostalism, Jehovah's Witnesses/Mormons, SSPX, SSPV, etc. on the RC side.  Schism is the mother of schism, and yours is a great-great-great grandma by now.  Hers is a "beautiful" family.  #givemeabreak   

Really, you'll need to work on your material.  I don't mind if you don't agree with us, but you should have better reasons.  Not one word of what I described as our faith ought to be disagreeable to you--in fact, I corrected your own statements.  But if you're going to curse the truth because "the other guys" believe it, you've got more serious issues. 



The E. Councels were over seen by the Holy Spirit, how can you go against the Holy Spirit? That's my reason.
Logged

"If you die before you die, you will not die when you die"
mike
Stratopedarches
**************
Offline Offline

Posts: 21,467


WWW
« Reply #333 on: July 26, 2013, 05:26:46 PM »

Yawn. Go to Private Fora and play with yourselves there.
Logged

Byzantinism
no longer posting here
Mor Ephrem
"Mor is right, you are wrong."
Section Moderator
Hoplitarches
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 17,415


The Pope Emeritus reading OCNet


WWW
« Reply #334 on: July 26, 2013, 05:49:55 PM »

Yawn. Go to Private Fora and play with yourselves there.

English not your first language, or are you speaking from personal expertise?  Tongue
Logged

Apolytikion, Tone 1, by Antonis

An eloquent crafter of divine posts
And an inheritor of the line of the Baptist
A righteous son of India
And a new apostle to the internet
O Holy Mor Ephrem,
Intercede for us, that our forum may be saved.


"Mor is a jerk." - kelly
mike
Stratopedarches
**************
Offline Offline

Posts: 21,467


WWW
« Reply #335 on: July 26, 2013, 05:51:25 PM »

Yawn. Go to Private Fora and play with yourselves there.

English not your first language, or are you speaking from personal expertise?  Tongue


Pun intended. Do you really need to troll some hyperdox newbie? It's not even funny and he does not realise you are trolling him.
« Last Edit: July 26, 2013, 05:56:40 PM by Michał Kalina » Logged

Byzantinism
no longer posting here
Mor Ephrem
"Mor is right, you are wrong."
Section Moderator
Hoplitarches
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 17,415


The Pope Emeritus reading OCNet


WWW
« Reply #336 on: July 26, 2013, 05:56:17 PM »

I don't need to, no.  You don't need to post half the stuff you post either.  But "need" hasn't been a meaningful category in internet discussion forum posting ever, so what's the problem?  "It's my constitutional right!"       

And I wasn't being funny. 
Logged

Apolytikion, Tone 1, by Antonis

An eloquent crafter of divine posts
And an inheritor of the line of the Baptist
A righteous son of India
And a new apostle to the internet
O Holy Mor Ephrem,
Intercede for us, that our forum may be saved.


"Mor is a jerk." - kelly
Salpy
Section Moderator
Toumarches
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Oriental Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Armenian Church
Posts: 12,657


Pray for the Christians of Iraq and Syria.


« Reply #337 on: July 26, 2013, 06:26:49 PM »

Let's get back on topic, and if people want to further debate Chalcedon and all its schematics, that would best take place in the private forum.   Smiley
« Last Edit: July 26, 2013, 11:26:33 PM by Salpy » Logged

podkarpatska
Merarches
***********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: ACROD
Posts: 8,477


Pokrov


WWW
« Reply #338 on: July 26, 2013, 06:40:52 PM »


Sorry, I didn't read the mods comment. I agree.

« Last Edit: July 26, 2013, 06:44:19 PM by podkarpatska » Logged
Father H
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian--God's One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church
Jurisdiction: UOCofUSA-Ecumenical Patriarchate
Posts: 2,611



« Reply #339 on: July 31, 2013, 06:10:44 PM »

Still, my point being, I would never join the non chalcedonians because they are not in communion with the one and only true Church because of their heretical beliefs, non chalcedonians are not orthodox, just as Roman Catholics aren't Orthodox, how can you be if you are not in the Church, the Church is not divided, there are only those who are divided from the Church.

Yes, there are only those who are divided from the Church, like the Chalcedonians, who left the communion of the one and only true Church (which has remained in God's peace and unity ever since) in order to wed themselves to earthly power, imperial and papal.  Since their schism in the fifth century, the Chalcedonians have divided repeatedly, first into so-called Eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholics, and then divided further: Old Ritualists, Old Calendarists, "the Living Church", etc. on the EO side and Protestantism, Pentecostalism, Jehovah's Witnesses/Mormons, SSPX, SSPV, etc. on the RC side.  Schism is the mother of schism, and yours is a great-great-great grandma by now.  Hers is a "beautiful" family.  #givemeabreak    

Really, you'll need to work on your material.  I don't mind if you don't agree with us, but you should have better reasons.  Not one word of what I described as our faith ought to be disagreeable to you--in fact, I corrected your own statements.  But if you're going to curse the truth because "the other guys" believe it, you've got more serious issues.  



The E. Councels were over seen by the Holy Spirit, how can you go against the Holy Spirit? That's my reason.

Peacemaker, not that you're wrong about everything, but "Peacemaker" as a screen name could be one of the worst misnomers ever.  So ROCOR's parishes of various rites all agree with the Ecumenical Councils.  You agree with this, yes?
« Last Edit: July 31, 2013, 06:13:59 PM by Father H » Logged
Agabus
The user formerly known as Agabus.
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Pan-American Colloquial Convert Hybrid Orthodoxy.
Jurisdiction: We are all uncanonical now.
Posts: 2,307



« Reply #340 on: July 31, 2013, 08:34:10 PM »

Still, my point being, I would never join the non chalcedonians because they are not in communion with the one and only true Church because of their heretical beliefs, non chalcedonians are not orthodox, just as Roman Catholics aren't Orthodox, how can you be if you are not in the Church, the Church is not divided, there are only those who are divided from the Church.

Yes, there are only those who are divided from the Church, like the Chalcedonians, who left the communion of the one and only true Church (which has remained in God's peace and unity ever since) in order to wed themselves to earthly power, imperial and papal.  Since their schism in the fifth century, the Chalcedonians have divided repeatedly, first into so-called Eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholics, and then divided further: Old Ritualists, Old Calendarists, "the Living Church", etc. on the EO side and Protestantism, Pentecostalism, Jehovah's Witnesses/Mormons, SSPX, SSPV, etc. on the RC side.  Schism is the mother of schism, and yours is a great-great-great grandma by now.  Hers is a "beautiful" family.  #givemeabreak    

Really, you'll need to work on your material.  I don't mind if you don't agree with us, but you should have better reasons.  Not one word of what I described as our faith ought to be disagreeable to you--in fact, I corrected your own statements.  But if you're going to curse the truth because "the other guys" believe it, you've got more serious issues.  



The E. Councels were over seen by the Holy Spirit, how can you go against the Holy Spirit? That's my reason.

Peacemaker, not that you're wrong about everything, but "Peacemaker" as a screen name could be one of the worst misnomers ever.
Considering that the Peacemaker was one of the most popular guns in history, perhaps it is quite apt.
Logged

Blessed Nazarius practiced the ascetic life. His clothes were tattered. He wore his shoes without removing them for six years.

THE OPINIONS HERE MAY NOT REFLECT THE ACTUAL OR PERCEIVED ORTHODOX CHURCH
Peacemaker
Elder
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 469



« Reply #341 on: August 01, 2013, 01:07:20 AM »

Still, my point being, I would never join the non chalcedonians because they are not in communion with the one and only true Church because of their heretical beliefs, non chalcedonians are not orthodox, just as Roman Catholics aren't Orthodox, how can you be if you are not in the Church, the Church is not divided, there are only those who are divided from the Church.

Yes, there are only those who are divided from the Church, like the Chalcedonians, who left the communion of the one and only true Church (which has remained in God's peace and unity ever since) in order to wed themselves to earthly power, imperial and papal.  Since their schism in the fifth century, the Chalcedonians have divided repeatedly, first into so-called Eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholics, and then divided further: Old Ritualists, Old Calendarists, "the Living Church", etc. on the EO side and Protestantism, Pentecostalism, Jehovah's Witnesses/Mormons, SSPX, SSPV, etc. on the RC side.  Schism is the mother of schism, and yours is a great-great-great grandma by now.  Hers is a "beautiful" family.  #givemeabreak    

Really, you'll need to work on your material.  I don't mind if you don't agree with us, but you should have better reasons.  Not one word of what I described as our faith ought to be disagreeable to you--in fact, I corrected your own statements.  But if you're going to curse the truth because "the other guys" believe it, you've got more serious issues.  



The E. Councels were over seen by the Holy Spirit, how can you go against the Holy Spirit? That's my reason.

Peacemaker, not that you're wrong about everything, but "Peacemaker" as a screen name could be one of the worst misnomers ever.  So ROCOR's parishes of various rites all agree with the Ecumenical Councils.  You agree with this, yes?

Let's get back on topic
« Last Edit: August 01, 2013, 01:07:39 AM by Peacemaker » Logged

"If you die before you die, you will not die when you die"
Didymus
Peace and grace.
High Elder
******
Offline Offline

Faith: Oriental Orthodox
Jurisdiction: HG Coptic Bishop Anba Daniel of Sydney
Posts: 563


St. Thomas Didymus the Apostle of India


« Reply #342 on: August 04, 2013, 09:53:05 AM »

This is very unfortunate, especially for the WR. That said, having met Met. Hilarion, I believe HE would only do what HE believes would be right in the eyes of God.

Yet considering all the troubles which various Orthodox jurisdictions have faced while missioning in the West and receiving converts, either in large number or individually, it seems to me as though novices to the Faith are all too often promoted too quickly. While I believe that the orders of those validly ordained with apostolic succession should be recognised when they convert, I believe they should be required to attend some extra form of spiritual retreat before they are received or perhaps made to serve as an assistant priest for a couple of years until the receiving Church can have some greater form of reassurance that the new convert will remain faithful.
Would not a valid option be, if they ordained them anyway, is to place them under an experienced priest for several years before sending them out on their own.  This could effectively double the priesthood while at the same time allowing for sufficient training.  I always thought it would be better for a new priest to work with an experienced one for a number of years anyway.

Agreed. Despite the need for more priests, I think it would be best if two priests (one experienced, one in training) served each major parish and that only experienced priests serve small/mission parishes to ensure their safety and stability.
Logged

...because I was not with you when the Lord came aforetime.
...because I am blind and yet I see.
Aristobolus
Member
***
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Posts: 132



« Reply #343 on: August 05, 2013, 03:20:14 AM »

If by "experienced" you mean retired, but willing to assist with a small parish, that is a great situation.  But any experienced Priests with children or nearing retirement cannot subsist on what most small missions pay them. 
Logged
ilyazhito
High Elder
******
Offline Offline

Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: ROCOR
Posts: 907



« Reply #344 on: August 05, 2013, 01:46:05 PM »

This is very unfortunate, especially for the WR. That said, having met Met. Hilarion, I believe HE would only do what HE believes would be right in the eyes of God.

Yet considering all the troubles which various Orthodox jurisdictions have faced while missioning in the West and receiving converts, either in large number or individually, it seems to me as though novices to the Faith are all too often promoted too quickly. While I believe that the orders of those validly ordained with apostolic succession should be recognised when they convert, I believe they should be required to attend some extra form of spiritual retreat before they are received or perhaps made to serve as an assistant priest for a couple of years until the receiving Church can have some greater form of reassurance that the new convert will remain faithful.
Would not a valid option be, if they ordained them anyway, is to place them under an experienced priest for several years before sending them out on their own.  This could effectively double the priesthood while at the same time allowing for sufficient training.  I always thought it would be better for a new priest to work with an experienced one for a number of years anyway.

Agreed. Despite the need for more priests, I think it would be best if two priests (one experienced, one in training) served each major parish and that only experienced priests serve small/mission parishes to ensure their safety and stability.
Either that, or have one priest and one deacon. If the deacon could be ordained a priest eventually, the priest would train him on the job. If not, the permanent deacon would then be the priest's assistant. With a priest, deacon, and subdeacon available at each parish, there would be fewer problems of succession, but even the readers and subdeacons would have to be vetted, to ensure that they would be able to succeed the priest and deacon if and when needed.
Logged
podkarpatska
Merarches
***********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: ACROD
Posts: 8,477


Pokrov


WWW
« Reply #345 on: August 05, 2013, 01:51:40 PM »

This is very unfortunate, especially for the WR. That said, having met Met. Hilarion, I believe HE would only do what HE believes would be right in the eyes of God.

Yet considering all the troubles which various Orthodox jurisdictions have faced while missioning in the West and receiving converts, either in large number or individually, it seems to me as though novices to the Faith are all too often promoted too quickly. While I believe that the orders of those validly ordained with apostolic succession should be recognised when they convert, I believe they should be required to attend some extra form of spiritual retreat before they are received or perhaps made to serve as an assistant priest for a couple of years until the receiving Church can have some greater form of reassurance that the new convert will remain faithful.
Would not a valid option be, if they ordained them anyway, is to place them under an experienced priest for several years before sending them out on their own.  This could effectively double the priesthood while at the same time allowing for sufficient training.  I always thought it would be better for a new priest to work with an experienced one for a number of years anyway.

Agreed. Despite the need for more priests, I think it would be best if two priests (one experienced, one in training) served each major parish and that only experienced priests serve small/mission parishes to ensure their safety and stability.
Either that, or have one priest and one deacon. If the deacon could be ordained a priest eventually, the priest would train him on the job. If not, the permanent deacon would then be the priest's assistant. With a priest, deacon, and subdeacon available at each parish, there would be fewer problems of succession, but even the readers and subdeacons would have to be vetted, to ensure that they would be able to succeed the priest and deacon if and when needed.

You have to trust your bishop' s discernment. I know plenty of experienced priests and deacons who shouldn't be within a mile of a neophyte!
Logged
Carl Kraeff (Second Chance)
Warned
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 6,833



« Reply #346 on: August 05, 2013, 03:15:42 PM »

^^ +1
Logged

Michal: "SC, love you in this thread."
Tags:
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.113 seconds with 58 queries.