Personally, I generally support what Hierotheos has to say. And, what I've heard about Zizioulas so far (and he is very new to me) is stuff I don't agree with. However, I don't even know why Krotok mentioned the two persons in reference to my own blog posts since I have not represented either Hierotheos and Zizioulas. At any rate, if Krotok thinks that I am similar to Zizioulas, I can't stop him even though I disagree. However, he should stop associating me with any of two persons themselves and not just that -- since I mentioned explicitly that I disagree with Zizioulas as Krotok presented him. Not only I haven't heard about him until now, but I disagree with what appears to be his theology. That being said, I don't know why Krotok keeps ignoring what I say and instead wants to fit me into one of his categories. I am not upset, but I think he's doing himself a disservice. He can just say he disagrees with me, but instead wants to say that I am totally wrong and infected, so on ... I did not claim that I am perfect, just presented my own thoughts. I am meditating on Fr. Dumitru Staniloae primarily and other people that I have quoted in addition to what I know from The Fathers.
Anyway, the big question for me is who is Krotok actually basing his initial post upon. I simply would like to investigate the "lineage" of his own thinking, but he keeps dodging the question by putting me as a person in a bad light, but wait a minute: why is that you Krotok are right and what do you have to support yourself?