OrthodoxChristianity.net
October 26, 2014, 01:14:12 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Reminder: No political discussions in the public fora.  If you do not have access to the private Politics Forum, please send a PM to Fr. George.
 
   Home   Help Calendar Contact Treasury Tags Login Register  
Pages: 1   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Sees of Peter  (Read 308 times) Average Rating: 0
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
montalban
Now in colour
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Greek
Posts: 1,813



« on: June 15, 2013, 12:00:27 PM »

Alexandria is known as a See of Peter (Pope Gregory called it this in Epistles of Saint Gregory the Great, Book VII, Epistle XL. To Eulogius, Bishop)

I'm confused by this.

Mark is said to be the first bishop. Why isn't it a See of Mark?

Also, are there any Sees of Paul?

If Peter and Paul are 'equals' then why is Rome a Petrine See?
Logged

Fàilte dhut a Mhoire,
tha thu lan de na gràsan;
Tha an Tighearna maille riut.
NicholasMyra
Avowed denominationalist
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Antiochian/Greek
Posts: 5,973


When in doubt, say: "you lack the proper φρόνημα"


« Reply #1 on: June 15, 2013, 12:33:26 PM »

Also, are there any Sees of Paul?
Antioch is Peter and Paul, for one.
Logged

Quote from: Orthonorm
if Christ does and says x. And someone else does and says not x and you are ever in doubt, follow Christ.
Mor Ephrem
"Mor is right, you are wrong."
Section Moderator
Hoplitarches
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 17,843


The Pope Emeritus reading OCNet


WWW
« Reply #2 on: June 15, 2013, 01:24:13 PM »

Alexandria is primarily known as the See of St Mark.  But in the fifth century Pope Leo of Rome, in responding to the increasing claims of Constantinople, underscored the idea of "Apostolic" sees, and claimed that Rome, Alexandria, and Antioch were not only "Apostolic" but "Petrine".  This is clear with regard to Rome and Antioch (both associated with SS Peter and Paul, though St Paul doesn't get much more than honourable mention for some reason), while with regard to Alexandria, the Petrine claim is through St Mark, as the disciple/secretary of St Peter.  This focus on apostolicity (and even the Petrine focus) was to counter the idea that, with the moving of the imperial capital from Rome to Constantinople, the latter should enjoy prerogatives above Alexandria and Antioch, and certainly at least as equal to Rome. 

I don't know if there are any "Sees of St Paul".  The only ones I know of that are linked to St Paul are also linked to St Peter.  But I don't know if anyone out there claims to be the Successor of St Paul.  Maybe he was too itinerant an apostle to settle down somewhere long enough to "establish" a see.       
Logged

Apolytikion, Tone 1, by Antonis

An eloquent crafter of divine posts
And an inheritor of the line of the Baptist
A righteous son of India
And a new apostle to the internet
O Holy Mor Ephrem,
Intercede for us, that our forum may be saved.


Mor Ephrem > Justin Kissel
Tags: Petrine Primacy 
Pages: 1   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.055 seconds with 31 queries.