yeshuaisiam needs no other religion other than the one he has created for himself.
Yeah but your leaders violate the very foundational rules of the church....
So did St. Peter, and yet his apostleship stood.
But Sol is in error in part: part of your religion has been created for you by the prophets of Protestantism, who rantings jumbled together you prefer to try to pass off as the Gospel Truth, rather than passing on the Holy Tradition of the Apostles.
So in this context one could say that *YOU* need no other religion, than what some other man made up for you
yes, that would be the Son of Man.
that is not historical
your lack of historical sense disqualifies you from opining in the matter.
but merely "mutated" through the years.
It's called growth. Like a baby growing up into a man.
Do drink your milk.
Those not in the "club agenda" have gotten the boot through many points of history.
Ah, yes. Judas, Nicolas the proselyte of Antioch (Acts 6:5; Rev. 2:6,16), Marcion, Montanus, Valentinus, Origen, Arius, Macedonius, Nestorius, Pelagius, Eutychus, Sergius, Leo....the apostolic succession of heretics and heresy.
Btw, many of the above held their boot on the Church through many points of history. But that Son of Man Who made up our religion for us promised that the Gates of Hell would never prevail over it, and so the Church emerged triumphant every time, as she shall until the end of time.
You do know at one time there was no prayer rope
we hashed through your ignorance on this matter on another thread IIRC.
If I recall, the fact that the earliest Christian remains we have, dating well before your magic 300 date, are full of icons, was mentioned. That you chose to ignore it is your problem, not ours.
"Easter" (pagan morphed)
Of all the blantly regurgitated Protestant trash talk you post, this has to be tops-or the bottom, as it were. There is PLENTY of historical evidence of the celebration of ALL Christians of Pascha before your magical date of 300.
"Christmas" (pagan morphed)
actually, the opposite is true. We have discussed this before, IIRC, where I gave an article demonstrating this deluded modern fallacy is ahistorical:
Rather, the pagan festival of the “Birth of the Unconquered Son” instituted by the Roman Emperor Aurelian on 25 December 274, was almost certainly an attempt to create a pagan alternative to a date that was already of some significance to Roman Christians. Thus the “pagan origins of Christmas” is a myth without historical substance.http://www.touchstonemag.com/archives/article.php?id=16-10-012-v
table of oblation, asterisk, discos, etc.
Now you are just wallowing in ignorance, as the existence of altars, the sacrifice of the Eucharist, liturgical objects etc are well attested from the NT to our own day.
That was SIMPLY made up just for you - or morphed for you.
Yes, by Christ and the Holy Spirit living in His Body, the Church.
I guess I just got tired of people making stuff up for me...
evidently not, as evidence by the Protestantism you have guzzled down and vomited forth.
So I researched stuff
how long did it take you to find another gospel?
and decided to take a stand.
and you fell.
But anyway, I'm not the one getting anointed by a RC, but an EO bishop is in the photos above.
who anoints you?