|
ialmisry
|
 |
« on: March 11, 2013, 02:58:56 PM » |
|
Crystal Kelley ran through the calendar once again in her head.
It was August, and if she got pregnant soon, she could avoid carrying during the hot summer months -- she'd done that before and didn't want to do it again. There was no time to lose.
But there was one problem: She had no one to get her pregnant.
Kelley picked up the phone and called a familiar number. What about the nice single man who'd inquired before -- would he be interested? No, the woman told her. She hadn't heard from him in weeks.
Disappointed, Kelley asked if there was anyone else who would hire her. She'd had two miscarriages herself and wanted to help someone else with fertility problems. In return, she'd get a $22,000 fee.... Modernity proving yet it again it knows better than the tried and true principles of old fashioned morality http://www.cnn.com/2013/03/04/health/surrogacy-kelley-legal-battle/index.html?eref=igoogledmn_topstories |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Question a friend, perhaps he did not do it; but if he did anything so that he may do it no more.
A hasty quarrel kindles fire,
and urgent strife sheds blood.
If you blow on a spark, it will glow;
if you spit on it, it will be put out;
and both come out of your mouth
|
|
|
Cyrillic
Section Moderator
Taxiarches
 Offline
Faith: Christian
Jurisdiction: Moscow
Posts: 6,752
Hello. My name is Cyrillic.
|
|
« Reply #1 on: March 11, 2013, 03:02:46 PM » |
|
Horrible. What more is there to say?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I hate to agree with Cyrillic |
|
|
LizaSymonenko
Слава Ісусу Христу!!! Glory to Jesus Christ!!!
Global Moderator
Merarches
Offline
Faith: God's Holy Catholic and Apostolic Orthodox Church
Jurisdiction: Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the U.S.A.
Posts: 10,163
|
|
« Reply #2 on: March 11, 2013, 03:16:01 PM » |
|
Horrible both ways.
First the biological parents state they wish to play "God" and terminate the child, saving it pain and suffering.
The surrogate mom is against this, and states that nobody should play "God".....in which case what was the whole biological mom can't conceive, so let's impregnate another woman and get that child anyway. Isn't that also playing "God" in a way?
Poor child. Thank God that an adoptive family showed up to love and care for Baby S, for as long as she has on this earth. Everyone should be loved.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Conquer evil men by your gentle kindness, and make zealous men wonder at your goodness. Put the lover of legality to shame by your compassion. With the afflicted be afflicted in mind. Love all men, but keep distant from all men.
—St. Isaac of Syria
|
|
|
Shiny
Übermensch
Site Supporter
Moderated
Toumarches
Offline
Faith: Groucho Marxist
Jurisdiction: Dahntahn Stoop Haus
Posts: 12,750
Paint It Red
|
|
« Reply #3 on: March 11, 2013, 03:23:35 PM » |
|
Modernity proving yet it again it knows better than the tried and true principles of old fashioned morality
How are you defining modernity, Isa? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Morality and nature are not related at all. Rape is natural yet, it is immoral. Morality isn't defined by nature nor is nature defined by morality. Morality is morality and nature is nature. JamesR pwns, for real |
|
|
|
vamrat
|
|
« Reply #4 on: March 11, 2013, 03:40:37 PM » |
|
Horrible both ways.
First the biological parents state they wish to play "God" and terminate the child, saving it pain and suffering.
The surrogate mom is against this, and states that nobody should play "God".....in which case what was the whole biological mom can't conceive, so let's impregnate another woman and get that child anyway. Isn't that also playing "God" in a way?
Poor child. Thank God that an adoptive family showed up to love and care for Baby S, for as long as she has on this earth. Everyone should be loved.
Using a surrogate mom to get a child is quite natural and has been used throughout history. Even the Bible talks about it. Since Sarah couldn't conceive they just went with Hagar. Albeit, they didn't do any of that new fangled invitro-whatever. I seem to remember God getting a little ticked about that, though... But still natural! As for 10k to abort a baby...David arranged to have Uriah post-birth-aborted when he got inconvenient. Then again, I don't think God was thrilled about that either. These people are cruisin' for a bruisin'! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
One day we will talk about why people fetishize children, but for now I'll keep on the side of humanity that doesn't think the height of life is a drinking a juice box and eating a tater tot while defecating in their pants.
|
|
|
|
JamesR
|
|
« Reply #5 on: March 11, 2013, 03:50:37 PM » |
|
The fudge?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Wherever goes JamesR goes, he is there. -Orthonorm |
|
|
LizaSymonenko
Слава Ісусу Христу!!! Glory to Jesus Christ!!!
Global Moderator
Merarches
Offline
Faith: God's Holy Catholic and Apostolic Orthodox Church
Jurisdiction: Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the U.S.A.
Posts: 10,163
|
|
« Reply #6 on: March 11, 2013, 09:06:32 PM » |
|
Horrible both ways.
First the biological parents state they wish to play "God" and terminate the child, saving it pain and suffering.
The surrogate mom is against this, and states that nobody should play "God".....in which case what was the whole biological mom can't conceive, so let's impregnate another woman and get that child anyway. Isn't that also playing "God" in a way?
Poor child. Thank God that an adoptive family showed up to love and care for Baby S, for as long as she has on this earth. Everyone should be loved.
Using a surrogate mom to get a child is quite natural and has been used throughout history. Even the Bible talks about it. Since Sarah couldn't conceive they just went with Hagar. Albeit, they didn't do any of that new fangled invitro-whatever. I seem to remember God getting a little ticked about that, though... But still natural! As for 10k to abort a baby...David arranged to have Uriah post-birth-aborted when he got inconvenient. Then again, I don't think God was thrilled about that either. These people are cruisin' for a bruisin'! Yes, but Hagar's baby wasn't deep frozen. ...and just because Abraham did it, doesn't make it right. He was told he would be a father. He should have had faith and waited patiently. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Conquer evil men by your gentle kindness, and make zealous men wonder at your goodness. Put the lover of legality to shame by your compassion. With the afflicted be afflicted in mind. Love all men, but keep distant from all men.
—St. Isaac of Syria
|
|
|
|
Nephi
|
|
« Reply #7 on: March 12, 2013, 09:23:08 AM » |
|
I thought I saw an article recently saying they were offered $200k? Maybe I'm remembering wrongly...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Liberalochian: Ecumenism Lite™
|
|
|
Arachne
Trinary Unit || Resident Bossy Boots
Section Moderator
Archon
Offline
Faith: Greek Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Antiochian Orthodox Deanery of the UK and Ireland
Posts: 2,790
Tending Brigid's flame
|
|
« Reply #8 on: March 12, 2013, 09:45:17 AM » |
|
Using a surrogate mom to get a child is quite natural and has been used throughout history. Even the Bible talks about it. Since Sarah couldn't conceive they just went with Hagar. Albeit, they didn't do any of that new fangled invitro-whatever.
I seem to remember God getting a little ticked about that, though...
But still natural! Er... Hagar was not a surrogate. She was Ishmael's biological mother. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
orthros
Jr. Member
Offline
Faith: Melkite-Greek Catholic
Jurisdiction: Eparchy of Newton
Posts: 60
|
|
« Reply #9 on: March 12, 2013, 10:53:59 AM » |
|
Using a surrogate mom to get a child is quite natural and has been used throughout history. Even the Bible talks about it. Since Sarah couldn't conceive they just went with Hagar. Albeit, they didn't do any of that new fangled invitro-whatever.
I seem to remember God getting a little ticked about that, though...
But still natural! Er... Hagar was not a surrogate. She was Ishmael's biological mother. Not in the modern sense, to be sure, but since Ishmael was born "on Sarah's knees", Hagar's baby was meant to be Sarah's (not Hagar's). Unless I'm mistaken, this was the ancient version of surrogacy. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ialmisry
|
|
« Reply #10 on: March 12, 2013, 11:02:46 AM » |
|
Horrible both ways.
First the biological parents state they wish to play "God" and terminate the child, saving it pain and suffering.
The surrogate mom is against this, and states that nobody should play "God".....in which case what was the whole biological mom can't conceive, so let's impregnate another woman and get that child anyway. Isn't that also playing "God" in a way?
Poor child. Thank God that an adoptive family showed up to love and care for Baby S, for as long as she has on this earth. Everyone should be loved.
Using a surrogate mom to get a child is quite natural and has been used throughout history. Even the Bible talks about it. Since Sarah couldn't conceive they just went with Hagar. Albeit, they didn't do any of that new fangled invitro-whatever. I seem to remember God getting a little ticked about that, though... But still natural! As for 10k to abort a baby...David arranged to have Uriah post-birth-aborted when he got inconvenient. Then again, I don't think God was thrilled about that either. These people are cruisin' for a bruisin'! Yes, but Hagar's baby wasn't deep frozen. ...and just because Abraham did it, doesn't make it right. He was told he would be a father. He should have had faith and waited patiently. To be fair, Mother Sarah, not Father Abraham, was not the one who lost her patience. He just repeated Adam's mistake of listening to the wife.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Question a friend, perhaps he did not do it; but if he did anything so that he may do it no more.
A hasty quarrel kindles fire,
and urgent strife sheds blood.
If you blow on a spark, it will glow;
if you spit on it, it will be put out;
and both come out of your mouth
|
|
|
|
ialmisry
|
|
« Reply #11 on: March 12, 2013, 11:02:46 AM » |
|
Using a surrogate mom to get a child is quite natural and has been used throughout history. Even the Bible talks about it. Since Sarah couldn't conceive they just went with Hagar. Albeit, they didn't do any of that new fangled invitro-whatever.
I seem to remember God getting a little ticked about that, though...
But still natural! Er... Hagar was not a surrogate. She was Ishmael's biological mother. Yes, she was a surrogate: "And Sarai said unto Abram, Behold now, the LORD has restrained me from bearing: I pray you, go in unto my maid; it may be that I may obtain children by her. And Abram hearkened to the voice of Sarai." Gen. 16:2. Such surrogacy was an established practice in the Near East at the time, attested by documents outside of the Bible. Jacob would repeat the same with both of his wives' slaves. Of course, like all legal fictions, it crashed when it came upon reality. Notice how God's advice wasn't sought before they went with Sarai's idea. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Question a friend, perhaps he did not do it; but if he did anything so that he may do it no more.
A hasty quarrel kindles fire,
and urgent strife sheds blood.
If you blow on a spark, it will glow;
if you spit on it, it will be put out;
and both come out of your mouth
|
|
|
Tikhon.of.Colorado
But you can call me Trevor.
Site Supporter
Archon
Offline
Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 2,337
|
|
« Reply #12 on: March 12, 2013, 11:30:45 AM » |
|
I saw this on the news.
The "pro life" mother of the child actually signed a contract saying that she had to abort if the fetus was found to be flawed, and she went against the contract she signed. Such a "pro lifer" should never sign a contract where abortion has anything to do with an abnormal fetus.
The people bribing her to abort her child are rediculous.
This is just utterly rediculous. The poor child. Thank God that someone came along to care for her.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Maybe I'm posting, maybe I'm not. Who knows...
|
|
|
|
J Michael
|
|
« Reply #13 on: March 12, 2013, 12:19:08 PM » |
|
Using a surrogate mom to get a child is quite natural and has been used throughout history. Even the Bible talks about it. Since Sarah couldn't conceive they just went with Hagar. Albeit, they didn't do any of that new fangled invitro-whatever.
I seem to remember God getting a little ticked about that, though...
But still natural! Er... Hagar was not a surrogate. She was Ishmael's biological mother. Yes, she was a surrogate: "And Sarai said unto Abram, Behold now, the LORD has restrained me from bearing: I pray you, go in unto my maid; it may be that I may obtain children by her. And Abram hearkened to the voice of Sarai." Gen. 16:2. Such surrogacy was an established practice in the Near East at the time, attested by documents outside of the Bible. Jacob would repeat the same with both of his wives' slaves. Of course, like all legal fictions, it crashed when it came upon reality. Notice how God's advice wasn't sought before they went with Sarai's idea. is a great point!! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Right is right even if no one is doing it; wrong is wrong even if everyone is doing it."
— St. Augustine of Hippo
|
|
|
Arachne
Trinary Unit || Resident Bossy Boots
Section Moderator
Archon
Offline
Faith: Greek Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Antiochian Orthodox Deanery of the UK and Ireland
Posts: 2,790
Tending Brigid's flame
|
|
« Reply #14 on: March 12, 2013, 12:20:01 PM » |
|
Using a surrogate mom to get a child is quite natural and has been used throughout history. Even the Bible talks about it. Since Sarah couldn't conceive they just went with Hagar. Albeit, they didn't do any of that new fangled invitro-whatever.
I seem to remember God getting a little ticked about that, though...
But still natural! Er... Hagar was not a surrogate. She was Ishmael's biological mother. Yes, she was a surrogate: "And Sarai said unto Abram, Behold now, the LORD has restrained me from bearing: I pray you, go in unto my maid; it may be that I may obtain children by her. And Abram hearkened to the voice of Sarai." Gen. 16:2. Such surrogacy was an established practice in the Near East at the time, attested by documents outside of the Bible. Jacob would repeat the same with both of his wives' slaves. Of course, like all legal fictions, it crashed when it came upon reality. Notice how God's advice wasn't sought before they went with Sarai's idea. In that case, one would think Sarah would keep 'her' son and kick only Hagar out when things went pear-shaped. At least Jacob seems to have fared remarkably better in that respect. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
J Michael
|
|
« Reply #15 on: March 12, 2013, 12:29:25 PM » |
|
Using a surrogate mom to get a child is quite natural and has been used throughout history. Even the Bible talks about it. Since Sarah couldn't conceive they just went with Hagar. Albeit, they didn't do any of that new fangled invitro-whatever.
I seem to remember God getting a little ticked about that, though...
But still natural! Er... Hagar was not a surrogate. She was Ishmael's biological mother. Yes, she was a surrogate: "And Sarai said unto Abram, Behold now, the LORD has restrained me from bearing: I pray you, go in unto my maid; it may be that I may obtain children by her. And Abram hearkened to the voice of Sarai." Gen. 16:2. Such surrogacy was an established practice in the Near East at the time, attested by documents outside of the Bible. Jacob would repeat the same with both of his wives' slaves. Of course, like all legal fictions, it crashed when it came upon reality. Notice how God's advice wasn't sought before they went with Sarai's idea. In that case, one would think Sarah would keep 'her' son and kick only Hagar out when things went pear-shaped. At least Jacob seems to have fared remarkably better in that respect. Trying to second guess Scripture is pretty futile, don't you think? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Right is right even if no one is doing it; wrong is wrong even if everyone is doing it."
— St. Augustine of Hippo
|
|
|
|
orthonorm
|
|
« Reply #16 on: March 12, 2013, 02:34:50 PM » |
|
Can't believe it took this long for this nonsensical story to make it here.
I had the over / under on it being here a week before I heard about it while walking by a TV doing trash news.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Not likely to respond to any posts or PMs. If you really must contact me, see my email. Happy Holidays!
|
|
|
|
orthonorm
|
|
« Reply #17 on: March 12, 2013, 02:37:26 PM » |
|
I saw this on the news.
The "pro life" mother of the child actually signed a contract saying that she had to abort if the fetus was found to be flawed, and she went against the contract she signed. Such a "pro lifer" should never sign a contract where abortion has anything to do with an abnormal fetus.
The people bribing her to abort her child are rediculous.
This is just utterly rediculous. The poor child. Thank God that someone came along to care for her.
She bargained with the family for more money for the abortion and when the family held out, she went all Hell Fire & Hard Copy. Sorry folks, the kid is just a way to make a buck. This is a sad story all around. You would think some here would see that. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: March 12, 2013, 02:37:47 PM by orthonorm »
|
Logged
|
Not likely to respond to any posts or PMs. If you really must contact me, see my email. Happy Holidays!
|
|
|
PeterTheAleut
The Right Blowhard Peter the Furtive of Yetts O'Muckhart
Section Moderator
Protospatharios
Offline
Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 28,373
EXTERMINATE!
|
|
« Reply #18 on: March 12, 2013, 03:47:03 PM » |
|
Horrible both ways.
First the biological parents state they wish to play "God" and terminate the child, saving it pain and suffering.
The surrogate mom is against this, and states that nobody should play "God".....in which case what was the whole biological mom can't conceive, so let's impregnate another woman and get that child anyway. Isn't that also playing "God" in a way?
Poor child. Thank God that an adoptive family showed up to love and care for Baby S, for as long as she has on this earth. Everyone should be loved.
Using a surrogate mom to get a child is quite natural and has been used throughout history. Even the Bible talks about it. Since Sarah couldn't conceive they just went with Hagar. Albeit, they didn't do any of that new fangled invitro-whatever. I seem to remember God getting a little ticked about that, though... But still natural! As for 10k to abort a baby...David arranged to have Uriah post-birth-aborted when he got inconvenient. Then again, I don't think God was thrilled about that either. These people are cruisin' for a bruisin'! Yes, but Hagar's baby wasn't deep frozen. ...and just because Abraham did it, doesn't make it right. He was told he would be a father. He should have had faith and waited patiently. To be fair, Mother Sarah, not Father Abraham, was not the one who lost her patience. He just repeated Adam's mistake of listening to the wife. Is this an unintended contradiction? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
