OrthodoxChristianity.net
August 30, 2014, 04:28:42 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Reminder: No political discussions in the public fora.  If you do not have access to the private Politics Forum, please send a PM to Fr. George.
 
   Home   Help Calendar Contact Treasury Tags Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6  All   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: The Final Proof: Mary had several children.....  (Read 6770 times) Average Rating: 0
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
TheTrisagion
Armed Feline rider of Flaming Unicorns
Warned
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Antiochian
Posts: 7,449



« Reply #225 on: March 13, 2013, 08:34:23 AM »

It really disturbs me how often Church doctrine is questioned on this forum.  I understand much of is not from Orthodox Christians, but it still bothers me.

You're not alone in this regard.

I think that most of the questions come from an honest inquiry.  In the US, many Orthodox are former protestants who struggle greatly with the foreigness of such teachings.  I think few people here have a desire to undermine Church doctrine, we (myself included) just want to "poke" it to see what the responses are.  It helps us build our confidence in understanding what the Church teaches.
Logged

Have you considered the possibility that your face is an ad hominem?
Somebody just went all Jack Chick up in here.
shreek
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Faith: Catholic
Jurisdiction: Maronite
Posts: 6


« Reply #226 on: November 08, 2013, 10:09:50 AM »

Jesus had no brothers or sisters, whether half or not.
Surprised that the Orthodox believe he did.
Logged
LizaSymonenko
Слава Ісусу Христу!!! Glory to Jesus Christ!!!
Global Moderator
Toumarches
******
Offline Offline

Faith: God's Holy Catholic and Apostolic Orthodox Church
Jurisdiction: Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the U.S.A.
Posts: 12,901



WWW
« Reply #227 on: November 08, 2013, 10:19:38 AM »


The Orthodox do not believe this.

What they DO believe is that Joseph, a widower, already had sons.

These are "step" brothers to Jesus.

This is what we know and believe.
Logged

Conquer evil men by your gentle kindness, and make zealous men wonder at your goodness. Put the lover of legality to shame by your compassion. With the afflicted be afflicted in mind. Love all men, but keep distant from all men.
—St. Isaac of Syria
Mor Ephrem
"Mor is right, you are wrong."
Section Moderator
Hoplitarches
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 16,409


In solidarity with Iraqi and Syrian Nazarenes


WWW
« Reply #228 on: November 08, 2013, 10:21:33 AM »

Jesus had no brothers or sisters, whether half or not.
Surprised that the Orthodox believe he did.

I'm surprised Maronites reject Scripture.  

It is the Gospels which call certain family members of Jesus his "brothers and sisters".  Of course, we believe that these are not the children of our Lady, but whether they are children of St Joseph from a previous marriage, or cousins, or what have you, we can't just throw out the concept of "brothers and sisters" when it's in the Gospels and even Jesus doesn't deny it (he expands it).  
Logged

Apolytikion, Tone 1, by Antonis

An eloquent crafter of divine posts
And an inheritor of the line of the Baptist
A righteous son of India
And a new apostle to the internet
O Holy Mor Ephrem,
Intercede for us, that our forum may be saved.


"Mor is a jerk." - kelly
Math lover
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Faith: Shia Muslim
Jurisdiction: Twelver
Posts: 238


« Reply #229 on: November 08, 2013, 10:44:17 AM »

Jesus had no brothers or sisters, whether half or not.
Surprised that the Orthodox believe he did.

I'm surprised Maronites reject Scripture.  

It is the Gospels which call certain family members of Jesus his "brothers and sisters".  Of course, we believe that these are not the children of our Lady, but whether they are children of St Joseph from a previous marriage, or cousins, or what have you, we can't just throw out the concept of "brothers and sisters" when it's in the Gospels and even Jesus doesn't deny it (he expands it).  

I think shreek was referring to biological siblings.
Logged
xOrthodox4Christx
Warned
Archon
********
Online Online

Faith: Protestant (Inquirer)
Jurisdiction: Orthodox Christianity
Posts: 3,032



« Reply #230 on: November 08, 2013, 10:47:27 AM »

Jesus had no brothers or sisters, whether half or not.
Surprised that the Orthodox believe he did.

He had brothers and sisters from Joseph's end. Mary didn't conceive but Joseph made many women conceive before he married St. Mary. Of course, Joseph was an old man by the time St. Mary was wed with him.

Orthodox believe that Jesus' 'brothers' are brothers from Joseph's side. Not from St. Mary's womb.
Logged

"Rationalists are admirable beings, rationalism is a hideous monster when it claims for itself omnipotence. Attribution of omnipotence to reason is as bad a piece of idolatry as is worship of stock and stone, believing it to be God." (Mahatma Gandhi)
Mor Ephrem
"Mor is right, you are wrong."
Section Moderator
Hoplitarches
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 16,409


In solidarity with Iraqi and Syrian Nazarenes


WWW
« Reply #231 on: November 08, 2013, 10:49:51 AM »

I think shreek was referring to biological siblings.

I understand, but I still stand by what I wrote.  As a Catholic, his belief on this issue should not be different from ours, so I'm not sure where he got the idea that we differ.
Logged

Apolytikion, Tone 1, by Antonis

An eloquent crafter of divine posts
And an inheritor of the line of the Baptist
A righteous son of India
And a new apostle to the internet
O Holy Mor Ephrem,
Intercede for us, that our forum may be saved.


"Mor is a jerk." - kelly
Mor Ephrem
"Mor is right, you are wrong."
Section Moderator
Hoplitarches
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 16,409


In solidarity with Iraqi and Syrian Nazarenes


WWW
« Reply #232 on: November 08, 2013, 10:50:58 AM »

Mary didn't conceive but Joseph made many women conceive before he married St. Mary.

Um, what?  How many?
Logged

Apolytikion, Tone 1, by Antonis

An eloquent crafter of divine posts
And an inheritor of the line of the Baptist
A righteous son of India
And a new apostle to the internet
O Holy Mor Ephrem,
Intercede for us, that our forum may be saved.


"Mor is a jerk." - kelly
xOrthodox4Christx
Warned
Archon
********
Online Online

Faith: Protestant (Inquirer)
Jurisdiction: Orthodox Christianity
Posts: 3,032



« Reply #233 on: November 08, 2013, 10:53:57 AM »

Mary didn't conceive but Joseph made many women conceive before he married St. Mary.

Um, what?  How many?

Am I wrong? Correct me, I don't know if that is true or not.
Logged

"Rationalists are admirable beings, rationalism is a hideous monster when it claims for itself omnipotence. Attribution of omnipotence to reason is as bad a piece of idolatry as is worship of stock and stone, believing it to be God." (Mahatma Gandhi)
PeterTheAleut
The Right Blowhard Peter the Furtive of Yetts O'Muckhart
Moderator
Protospatharios
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 31,935


Lord, have mercy on the Christians in Mosul!


« Reply #234 on: November 08, 2013, 10:56:24 AM »

Jesus had no brothers or sisters, whether half or not.
Surprised that the Orthodox believe he did.

He had brothers and sisters from Joseph's end. Mary didn't conceive but Joseph made many women conceive before he married St. Mary.
"Made many women conceive"? Huh You do realize that our Tradition, AFAIK, does not speculate into Joseph's love life except to acknowledge that he was most likely a widower when he took the Theotokos to be his wife?
« Last Edit: November 08, 2013, 10:56:47 AM by PeterTheAleut » Logged
xOrthodox4Christx
Warned
Archon
********
Online Online

Faith: Protestant (Inquirer)
Jurisdiction: Orthodox Christianity
Posts: 3,032



« Reply #235 on: November 08, 2013, 11:10:24 AM »

Jesus had no brothers or sisters, whether half or not.
Surprised that the Orthodox believe he did.

He had brothers and sisters from Joseph's end. Mary didn't conceive but Joseph made many women conceive before he married St. Mary.
"Made many women conceive"? Huh You do realize that our Tradition, AFAIK, does not speculate into Joseph's love life except to acknowledge that he was most likely a widower when he took the Theotokos to be his wife?

Okay, I'm sorry, I didn't know the specifics. I'm really sorry, I shouldn't have been so rash to respond to something I don't have any knowledge of.
Logged

"Rationalists are admirable beings, rationalism is a hideous monster when it claims for itself omnipotence. Attribution of omnipotence to reason is as bad a piece of idolatry as is worship of stock and stone, believing it to be God." (Mahatma Gandhi)
Mor Ephrem
"Mor is right, you are wrong."
Section Moderator
Hoplitarches
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 16,409


In solidarity with Iraqi and Syrian Nazarenes


WWW
« Reply #236 on: November 08, 2013, 12:43:48 PM »

Am I wrong? Correct me, I don't know if that is true or not.

Our tradition, as noted above, is that St Joseph was an older man and a widower when he was betrothed to our Lady, that the choice of this older man was intentional and not for lack of younger guys.  I'm unaware of any tradition of his having married more than once before our Lady.  Even if he married more than once, "made many women conceive" is a bit too much.  St Joseph was not a player. 
Logged

Apolytikion, Tone 1, by Antonis

An eloquent crafter of divine posts
And an inheritor of the line of the Baptist
A righteous son of India
And a new apostle to the internet
O Holy Mor Ephrem,
Intercede for us, that our forum may be saved.


"Mor is a jerk." - kelly
minasoliman
Mr., Sir, Dude, Guy, Male, tr. Minas in Greek, Menes in white people Egyptologists :-P
Section Moderator
Toumarches
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Oriental Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Coptic Orthodox Archdiocese of North America
Posts: 11,034


Strengthen O Lord the work of Your hands(Is 19:25)


WWW
« Reply #237 on: November 08, 2013, 12:55:32 PM »

There's another possible tradition.  The sister of the Theotokos, also named Mary, is thought to have had children, who many in the Coptic Church have taken to think these are the "brothers and sisters" of Christ.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but do the Catholic Church believe that St. Joseph was a perpetual virgin?
Logged

Vain existence can never exist, for \\\"unless the LORD builds the house, the builders labor in vain.\\\" (Psalm 127)

If the faith is unchanged and rock solid, then the gates of Hades never prevailed in the end.
Sainte_Geneviève
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Faith: Eastern Orthodox Catechumen
Jurisdiction: Antiochian
Posts: 15



« Reply #238 on: November 08, 2013, 03:09:02 PM »

I went to a Catholic school (whose patron was St. Joseph) during middle school, and we were taught that St. Joseph was probably a widower with several children.
« Last Edit: November 08, 2013, 03:14:05 PM by Sainte_Geneviève » Logged
LizaSymonenko
Слава Ісусу Христу!!! Glory to Jesus Christ!!!
Global Moderator
Toumarches
******
Offline Offline

Faith: God's Holy Catholic and Apostolic Orthodox Church
Jurisdiction: Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the U.S.A.
Posts: 12,901



WWW
« Reply #239 on: November 08, 2013, 03:43:36 PM »

There's another possible tradition.  The sister of the Theotokos, also named Mary, is thought to have had children, who many in the Coptic Church have taken to think these are the "brothers and sisters" of Christ.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but do the Catholic Church believe that St. Joseph was a perpetual virgin?

The Theotokos had actual sisters?   How so?

Weren't her parents Anna and Joachim childless, and always praying that God grant them a child...which He did in their very old age.  So, are you saying they continued to have an additional child/children after Mary was born?
Logged

Conquer evil men by your gentle kindness, and make zealous men wonder at your goodness. Put the lover of legality to shame by your compassion. With the afflicted be afflicted in mind. Love all men, but keep distant from all men.
—St. Isaac of Syria
minasoliman
Mr., Sir, Dude, Guy, Male, tr. Minas in Greek, Menes in white people Egyptologists :-P
Section Moderator
Toumarches
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Oriental Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Coptic Orthodox Archdiocese of North America
Posts: 11,034


Strengthen O Lord the work of Your hands(Is 19:25)


WWW
« Reply #240 on: November 08, 2013, 03:47:10 PM »

There's another possible tradition.  The sister of the Theotokos, also named Mary, is thought to have had children, who many in the Coptic Church have taken to think these are the "brothers and sisters" of Christ.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but do the Catholic Church believe that St. Joseph was a perpetual virgin?

The Theotokos had actual sisters?   How so?

Weren't her parents Anna and Joachim childless, and always praying that God grant them a child...which He did in their very old age.  So, are you saying they continued to have an additional child/children after Mary was born?


Yes...there's a passage somewhere in the Scriptures...let me pull it out:

"Now there stood by the cross of Jesus His mother, and His mother’s sister, Mary the wife of Clopas, and Mary Magdalene." (John 19:25)

3 Mary's at the Cross by Christ's side, two of which were related to Christ.

Perhaps not a direct sister...maybe a cousin of the Theotokos?
« Last Edit: November 08, 2013, 03:47:58 PM by minasoliman » Logged

Vain existence can never exist, for \\\"unless the LORD builds the house, the builders labor in vain.\\\" (Psalm 127)

If the faith is unchanged and rock solid, then the gates of Hades never prevailed in the end.
minasoliman
Mr., Sir, Dude, Guy, Male, tr. Minas in Greek, Menes in white people Egyptologists :-P
Section Moderator
Toumarches
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Oriental Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Coptic Orthodox Archdiocese of North America
Posts: 11,034


Strengthen O Lord the work of Your hands(Is 19:25)


WWW
« Reply #241 on: November 08, 2013, 03:49:05 PM »

I went to a Catholic school (whose patron was St. Joseph) during middle school, and we were taught that St. Joseph was probably a widower with several children.

Oh okay...I got the idea from Fr. Sergius Bulgakov in his book on the Forerunner.  In it he adds an addendum chapter comparing our veneration of the Forerunner with the RC veneration of the betrothed.
Logged

Vain existence can never exist, for \\\"unless the LORD builds the house, the builders labor in vain.\\\" (Psalm 127)

If the faith is unchanged and rock solid, then the gates of Hades never prevailed in the end.
LizaSymonenko
Слава Ісусу Христу!!! Glory to Jesus Christ!!!
Global Moderator
Toumarches
******
Offline Offline

Faith: God's Holy Catholic and Apostolic Orthodox Church
Jurisdiction: Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the U.S.A.
Posts: 12,901



WWW
« Reply #242 on: November 08, 2013, 03:50:26 PM »

There's another possible tradition.  The sister of the Theotokos, also named Mary, is thought to have had children, who many in the Coptic Church have taken to think these are the "brothers and sisters" of Christ.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but do the Catholic Church believe that St. Joseph was a perpetual virgin?

The Theotokos had actual sisters?   How so?

Weren't her parents Anna and Joachim childless, and always praying that God grant them a child...which He did in their very old age.  So, are you saying they continued to have an additional child/children after Mary was born?


Yes...there's a passage somewhere in the Scriptures...let me pull it out:

"Now there stood by the cross of Jesus His mother, and His mother’s sister, Mary the wife of Clopas, and Mary Magdalene." (John 19:25)

3 Mary's at the Cross by Christ's side, two of which were related to Christ.

Perhaps not a direct sister...maybe a cousin of the Theotokos?

Yes.  I always thought them to be cousins, but, not sisters, per se.
Logged

Conquer evil men by your gentle kindness, and make zealous men wonder at your goodness. Put the lover of legality to shame by your compassion. With the afflicted be afflicted in mind. Love all men, but keep distant from all men.
—St. Isaac of Syria
genesisone
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Antioch
Posts: 2,481



« Reply #243 on: November 08, 2013, 04:16:15 PM »

Yes...there's a passage somewhere in the Scriptures...let me pull it out:

"Now there stood by the cross of Jesus His mother, and His mother’s sister, Mary the wife of Clopas, and Mary Magdalene." (John 19:25)

3 Mary's at the Cross by Christ's side, two of which were related to Christ.

Perhaps not a direct sister...maybe a cousin of the Theotokos?
I think it odd that two girls in the same family would be given the same name. However, my wife, for example, has a sister named Lois and a sister-in-law named Lois.

Also, are we absolutely sure that this is a list of three women? It is my understanding that punctuation in earlier times was generally absent. So could it read:
  • His mother
  • His mother's "sister" (in the sense that Jesus had brothers and sisters)
  • Mary the wife of Cleopas
  • Mary Magdalene

If there is clear teaching from our hymnography, iconography, or other, I'd appreciate the learning opportunity. I've already googled "icon crucifixion" then viewed images and discovered that the number of women varies - and some include four.
Logged
Mor Ephrem
"Mor is right, you are wrong."
Section Moderator
Hoplitarches
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 16,409


In solidarity with Iraqi and Syrian Nazarenes


WWW
« Reply #244 on: November 08, 2013, 04:20:46 PM »

I think it odd that two girls in the same family would be given the same name.

Different cultures have certain naming conventions governing who gets what name, and if you have a big family, it's not all that odd, for example, for you to have two siblings with the same name, but named after two different relatives.  Perhaps something like that obtained in that culture?  We know there was some sort of naming convention because when they try to name John the Baptist after his father in Luke 1, the parents insist on breaking tradition. 
Logged

Apolytikion, Tone 1, by Antonis

An eloquent crafter of divine posts
And an inheritor of the line of the Baptist
A righteous son of India
And a new apostle to the internet
O Holy Mor Ephrem,
Intercede for us, that our forum may be saved.


"Mor is a jerk." - kelly
Yurysprudentsiya
Section Moderator
OC.net guru
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: OCA, although in my heart I will always remain a loving son of the UOC-USA
Posts: 1,480


God, the Great, the Only, Keep for Us Our Ukraine!


« Reply #245 on: November 08, 2013, 04:23:18 PM »

Yes...there's a passage somewhere in the Scriptures...let me pull it out:

"Now there stood by the cross of Jesus His mother, and His mother’s sister, Mary the wife of Clopas, and Mary Magdalene." (John 19:25)

3 Mary's at the Cross by Christ's side, two of which were related to Christ.

Perhaps not a direct sister...maybe a cousin of the Theotokos?
I think it odd that two girls in the same family would be given the same name. However, my wife, for example, has a sister named Lois and a sister-in-law named Lois.

Also, are we absolutely sure that this is a list of three women? It is my understanding that punctuation in earlier times was generally absent. So could it read:
  • His mother
  • His mother's "sister" (in the sense that Jesus had brothers and sisters)
  • Mary the wife of Cleopas
  • Mary Magdalene

If there is clear teaching from our hymnography, iconography, or other, I'd appreciate the learning opportunity. I've already googled "icon crucifixion" then viewed images and discovered that the number of women varies - and some include four.

I'm interested in the resolution as well.  I've heard all the above versions and probably more.  I know that cousins are often called brothers and sisters in some cultures, especially Slavic ones.  So that is no big leap.  And I know that Germans often named all their children with the same first name (saints name) and different middle names well into the 19th century.  So two sisters named Mary isn't really that odd either. 
Logged
minasoliman
Mr., Sir, Dude, Guy, Male, tr. Minas in Greek, Menes in white people Egyptologists :-P
Section Moderator
Toumarches
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Oriental Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Coptic Orthodox Archdiocese of North America
Posts: 11,034


Strengthen O Lord the work of Your hands(Is 19:25)


WWW
« Reply #246 on: November 08, 2013, 04:48:56 PM »

I'll have to dig into the Coptic Holy Week texts to see what they say about the women by the Cross.
Logged

Vain existence can never exist, for \\\"unless the LORD builds the house, the builders labor in vain.\\\" (Psalm 127)

If the faith is unchanged and rock solid, then the gates of Hades never prevailed in the end.
shreek
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Faith: Catholic
Jurisdiction: Maronite
Posts: 6


« Reply #247 on: November 09, 2013, 10:26:13 AM »

Jesus had no brothers or sisters, whether half or not.
Surprised that the Orthodox believe he did.

I'm surprised Maronites reject Scripture.  

It is the Gospels which call certain family members of Jesus his "brothers and sisters".  Of course, we believe that these are not the children of our Lady, but whether they are children of St Joseph from a previous marriage, or cousins, or what have you, we can't just throw out the concept of "brothers and sisters" when it's in the Gospels and even Jesus doesn't deny it (he expands it).  

No we are Catholics we hold sacred scripture and sacred tradition to be equal, much like you.
However, one needs to realise in Hebrew, Old Aramaic, Syriac...and even Arabic there is no word for nephew or niece, nor even a precise word for cousin neither for aunt or uncle in ancient Hebrew or Aramaic - the words that the Jews used in all those instances were "brother" or "sister"
To this day in the Middle East even strangers call each other 'brother' or 'sister' in greeting them, let alone relatives.
but let's stick to scripture then:

An example of my above point can be seen in Gen 14:14, where Lot, who was Abraham's nephew, is called his brother.

Another point to consider. If Jesus had had any brothers, if Mary had had any other sons, would the last thing that Jesus did on earth be to grievously offend his surviving brothers?

In John 19:26-27, right before Jesus dies, it says that Jesus entrusted the care of His mother to the beloved disciple, John. If Mary had had any other sons, it would have been an incredible slap in the face to them that the Apostle John was entrusted with the care of their mother!

Plus The Lord is dying where are his 'brothers' and 'sisters'??

Also, we see from Matt. 27:55-56, that the James and Joses mentioned in Mark 6 as the "brothers" of Jesus, are actually the sons of another Mary.

In addition, one other passage to consider is Acts 1:14-15, "[The Apostles] with one accord devoted themselves to prayer, together with the women and Mary the mother of Jesus and with His brothers...the company of persons was in all about a hundred and twenty."

So a company of 120 persons composed of the Apostles, Mary, the women, and the "brothers" of Jesus. Let's see there were 11 Apostles at the time. Jesus' mother makes 12. The women, probably the same three women mentioned in Matthew 27, but let's say it was maybe a dozen or two, just for argument's sake. So that puts us up to 30 or 40 or so.

So that leaves the number of Jesus' brothers at about 80 or 90! Do you think Mary had 80 or 90 children? She would have been in perpetual labour not perpetual virginity,

No, Scripture does not contradict the teaching of the Maronite Catholic Church about the "brothers" of Jesus, when Scripture is properly interpreted in context.
« Last Edit: November 09, 2013, 10:27:38 AM by shreek » Logged
Mor Ephrem
"Mor is right, you are wrong."
Section Moderator
Hoplitarches
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 16,409


In solidarity with Iraqi and Syrian Nazarenes


WWW
« Reply #248 on: November 09, 2013, 11:59:27 AM »

No we are Catholics we hold sacred scripture and sacred tradition to be equal, much like you.
However, one needs to realise in Hebrew, Old Aramaic, Syriac...and even Arabic there is no word for nephew or niece, nor even a precise word for cousin neither for aunt or uncle in ancient Hebrew or Aramaic - the words that the Jews used in all those instances were "brother" or "sister"

I realise that, and so does the Orthodox Church, so I'm going to skip most of the apologetics (with one exception, below).  But even if Semitic languages don't have such terminology, the NT was not composed in those languages (with the possible exception of Matthew), but in Greek.  Does Greek share the same deficiency? 
 
Quote
In addition, one other passage to consider is Acts 1:14-15, "[The Apostles] with one accord devoted themselves to prayer, together with the women and Mary the mother of Jesus and with His brothers...the company of persons was in all about a hundred and twenty."

So a company of 120 persons composed of the Apostles, Mary, the women, and the "brothers" of Jesus. Let's see there were 11 Apostles at the time. Jesus' mother makes 12. The women, probably the same three women mentioned in Matthew 27, but let's say it was maybe a dozen or two, just for argument's sake. So that puts us up to 30 or 40 or so.

So that leaves the number of Jesus' brothers at about 80 or 90! Do you think Mary had 80 or 90 children? She would have been in perpetual labour not perpetual virginity,

No, Scripture does not contradict the teaching of the Maronite Catholic Church about the "brothers" of Jesus, when Scripture is properly interpreted in context.

Why do some Catholic posters on OCNet like to quote Scripture and the Fathers selectively?  You quote Acts 1.14-15 as:

Quote
[The Apostles] with one accord devoted themselves to prayer, together with the women and Mary the mother of Jesus and with His brothers...the company of persons was in all about a hundred and twenty.

Let's read it:

Quote
Acts 1

12 Then they returned to Jerusalem from the mount called Olivet, which is near Jerusalem, a sabbath day’s journey away; 13 and when they had entered, they went up to the upper room, where they were staying, Peter and John and James and Andrew, Philip and Thomas, Bartholomew and Matthew, James the son of Alphaeus and Simon the Zealot and Judas the son of James. 14 All these with one accord devoted themselves to prayer, together with the women and Mary the mother of Jesus, and with his brothers.

15 In those days Peter stood up among the brethren (the company of persons was in all about a hundred and twenty), and said, 16 “Brethren, the scripture had to be fulfilled, which the Holy Spirit spoke beforehand by the mouth of David, concerning Judas who was guide to those who arrested Jesus. 17 For he was numbered among us, and was allotted his share in this ministry. 18 (Now this man bought a field with the reward of his wickedness; and falling headlong he burst open in the middle and all his bowels gushed out. 19 And it became known to all the inhabitants of Jerusalem, so that the field was called in their language Akel′dama, that is, Field of Blood.) 20 For it is written in the book of Psalms,

‘Let his habitation become desolate,
and let there be no one to live in it’;

and

‘His office let another take.’

21 So one of the men who have accompanied us during all the time that the Lord Jesus went in and out among us, 22 beginning from the baptism of John until the day when he was taken up from us—one of these men must become with us a witness to his resurrection.” 23 And they put forward two, Joseph called Barsab′bas, who was surnamed Justus, and Matthi′as. 24 And they prayed and said, “Lord, who knowest the hearts of all men, show which one of these two thou hast chosen 25 to take the place in this ministry and apostleship from which Judas turned aside, to go to his own place.” 26 And they cast lots for them, and the lot fell on Matthi′as; and he was enrolled with the eleven apostles.

Your interpretation depends on all of these "brethren" being relatives of Jesus, or else you wouldn't have posed the ludicrous possibility of our Lady being in perpetual labour rather than perpetual virginity if all those were her children.  But you ignore the possibility (I'd say probability) that the bulk of these one hundred and twenty people were not family members of Jesus at all, but were followers ("brethren" being a generic way of referring to the faithful).  We know that Jesus had other followers (e.g., Mary, Martha, Lazarus, Joseph of Arimathea, Nicodemus), possibly other followers (e.g., perhaps people he healed and people related to them, like the family of Jairus), and certainly others we don't know about--after all, there's no tradition that Matthias was in any way related to Christ, and yet he was "one of the men that accompanied us", for which reason he was nominated for apostleship. 

We agree that Jesus did not have any blood brothers, and technically no half-brothers, that the "brothers and sisters" can be cousins, "step-siblings", etc.  My only point is that Scripture uses the term "brothers and sisters", and ecclesiastical tradition doesn't shy away from using the same term in teaching, in liturgy, etc., even in languages where there are many technical terms for family relations and we could translate for meaning rather than literal accuracy.  By all means, explain what "brethren" means, but we need not be afraid of using the term if the Evangelists weren't so hesitant.   
Logged

Apolytikion, Tone 1, by Antonis

An eloquent crafter of divine posts
And an inheritor of the line of the Baptist
A righteous son of India
And a new apostle to the internet
O Holy Mor Ephrem,
Intercede for us, that our forum may be saved.


"Mor is a jerk." - kelly
Marc1152
Warned
Toumarches
************
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Rocor
Posts: 12,637


Probiotic .. Antibiotic


« Reply #249 on: November 09, 2013, 12:41:49 PM »

No we are Catholics we hold sacred scripture and sacred tradition to be equal, much like you.
However, one needs to realise in Hebrew, Old Aramaic, Syriac...and even Arabic there is no word for nephew or niece, nor even a precise word for cousin neither for aunt or uncle in ancient Hebrew or Aramaic - the words that the Jews used in all those instances were "brother" or "sister"

I realise that, and so does the Orthodox Church, so I'm going to skip most of the apologetics (with one exception, below).  But even if Semitic languages don't have such terminology, the NT was not composed in those languages (with the possible exception of Matthew), but in Greek.  Does Greek share the same deficiency? 
 
Quote
In addition, one other passage to consider is Acts 1:14-15, "[The Apostles] with one accord devoted themselves to prayer, together with the women and Mary the mother of Jesus and with His brothers...the company of persons was in all about a hundred and twenty."

So a company of 120 persons composed of the Apostles, Mary, the women, and the "brothers" of Jesus. Let's see there were 11 Apostles at the time. Jesus' mother makes 12. The women, probably the same three women mentioned in Matthew 27, but let's say it was maybe a dozen or two, just for argument's sake. So that puts us up to 30 or 40 or so.

So that leaves the number of Jesus' brothers at about 80 or 90! Do you think Mary had 80 or 90 children? She would have been in perpetual labour not perpetual virginity,

No, Scripture does not contradict the teaching of the Maronite Catholic Church about the "brothers" of Jesus, when Scripture is properly interpreted in context.

Why do some Catholic posters on OCNet like to quote Scripture and the Fathers selectively?  You quote Acts 1.14-15 as:

Quote
[The Apostles] with one accord devoted themselves to prayer, together with the women and Mary the mother of Jesus and with His brothers...the company of persons was in all about a hundred and twenty.

Let's read it:

Quote
Acts 1

12 Then they returned to Jerusalem from the mount called Olivet, which is near Jerusalem, a sabbath day’s journey away; 13 and when they had entered, they went up to the upper room, where they were staying, Peter and John and James and Andrew, Philip and Thomas, Bartholomew and Matthew, James the son of Alphaeus and Simon the Zealot and Judas the son of James. 14 All these with one accord devoted themselves to prayer, together with the women and Mary the mother of Jesus, and with his brothers.

15 In those days Peter stood up among the brethren (the company of persons was in all about a hundred and twenty), and said, 16 “Brethren, the scripture had to be fulfilled, which the Holy Spirit spoke beforehand by the mouth of David, concerning Judas who was guide to those who arrested Jesus. 17 For he was numbered among us, and was allotted his share in this ministry. 18 (Now this man bought a field with the reward of his wickedness; and falling headlong he burst open in the middle and all his bowels gushed out. 19 And it became known to all the inhabitants of Jerusalem, so that the field was called in their language Akel′dama, that is, Field of Blood.) 20 For it is written in the book of Psalms,

‘Let his habitation become desolate,
and let there be no one to live in it’;

and

‘His office let another take.’

21 So one of the men who have accompanied us during all the time that the Lord Jesus went in and out among us, 22 beginning from the baptism of John until the day when he was taken up from us—one of these men must become with us a witness to his resurrection.” 23 And they put forward two, Joseph called Barsab′bas, who was surnamed Justus, and Matthi′as. 24 And they prayed and said, “Lord, who knowest the hearts of all men, show which one of these two thou hast chosen 25 to take the place in this ministry and apostleship from which Judas turned aside, to go to his own place.” 26 And they cast lots for them, and the lot fell on Matthi′as; and he was enrolled with the eleven apostles.

Your interpretation depends on all of these "brethren" being relatives of Jesus, or else you wouldn't have posed the ludicrous possibility of our Lady being in perpetual labour rather than perpetual virginity if all those were her children.  But you ignore the possibility (I'd say probability) that the bulk of these one hundred and twenty people were not family members of Jesus at all, but were followers ("brethren" being a generic way of referring to the faithful).  We know that Jesus had other followers (e.g., Mary, Martha, Lazarus, Joseph of Arimathea, Nicodemus), possibly other followers (e.g., perhaps people he healed and people related to them, like the family of Jairus), and certainly others we don't know about--after all, there's no tradition that Matthias was in any way related to Christ, and yet he was "one of the men that accompanied us", for which reason he was nominated for apostleship. 

We agree that Jesus did not have any blood brothers, and technically no half-brothers, that the "brothers and sisters" can be cousins, "step-siblings", etc.  My only point is that Scripture uses the term "brothers and sisters", and ecclesiastical tradition doesn't shy away from using the same term in teaching, in liturgy, etc., even in languages where there are many technical terms for family relations and we could translate for meaning rather than literal accuracy.  By all means, explain what "brethren" means, but we need not be afraid of using the term if the Evangelists weren't so hesitant.   


If Mary had other children why did she not go and live with them instead of St. John?

"Love to have you Mom, but with the kids out of school and Judy not working right now.... well the townhouse is real small and all I could do is offer you the couch to sleep on and I know your bad back probably cant handle it. Love to have you though. Really...but.... "
Logged

Your idea has been debunked 1000 times already.. Maybe 1001 will be the charm
minasoliman
Mr., Sir, Dude, Guy, Male, tr. Minas in Greek, Menes in white people Egyptologists :-P
Section Moderator
Toumarches
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Oriental Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Coptic Orthodox Archdiocese of North America
Posts: 11,034


Strengthen O Lord the work of Your hands(Is 19:25)


WWW
« Reply #250 on: November 09, 2013, 11:55:50 PM »

Nothing in the Coptic holy week book indicates there were 3 or 4 women, or whether the sister of Mary was also named Mary.  Even in the Synexarium, I had difficulty finding anything about the number of women by the Cross.  From what I can gather though, in the commemoration of St. Anna, the Mother of the Theotokos, it was mentioned that St. Anna was one of 3 sisters:  Mary, Salome, and Anna.
Logged

Vain existence can never exist, for \\\"unless the LORD builds the house, the builders labor in vain.\\\" (Psalm 127)

If the faith is unchanged and rock solid, then the gates of Hades never prevailed in the end.
JamesR
Virginal Chicano Blood
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: On-n-Off
Jurisdiction: OCA (the only truly Canonical American Orthodox Church)
Posts: 5,518


St. Augustine of Hippo pray for me!


« Reply #251 on: November 10, 2013, 02:23:44 AM »

On a somewhat related note, what would the family dynamic be like around Jesus' time? Was it the standard mother, father, and children? Or was it a bit different? How did communities function and what would childhood have been like for Jesus? Did both parents raise their children or did only one or did the extended family raise children etc?
Logged

Quote
You're really on to something here. Tattoo to keep you from masturbating, chew to keep you from fornicating... it's a whole new world where you outsource your crosses. You're like a Christian entrepreneur or something.
Quote
James, you have problemz.
Marc1152
Warned
Toumarches
************
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Rocor
Posts: 12,637


Probiotic .. Antibiotic


« Reply #252 on: November 10, 2013, 05:32:46 PM »

On a somewhat related note, what would the family dynamic be like around Jesus' time? Was it the standard mother, father, and children? Or was it a bit different? How did communities function and what would childhood have been like for Jesus? Did both parents raise their children or did only one or did the extended family raise children etc?

Great question. I would also like to hear more from anyone who has studied this. The one thing I have read is that "childhood" is a rather modern invention. Kids were just smaller weaker people who were expected to what they could to help sustain the family.
Logged

Your idea has been debunked 1000 times already.. Maybe 1001 will be the charm
Jetavan
Most Humble Servant of Pan-Vespuccian and Holocenic Hominids
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Christic
Jurisdiction: Dixie
Posts: 6,410


Barlaam and Josaphat


WWW
« Reply #253 on: January 03, 2014, 09:47:56 AM »

Oh boy, here we go.

Someone please explain to him about St. Joseph's previous marriage, and what half-siblings are?
but any children Joseph had by a previous marriage would not have been the Lord's half-siblings, unless Joseph himself sired the Lord.  the Lord Jesus had no half-siblings

The Orthodox believe that He did.

Obviously you have no idea what you're talking about. This is probably the first time you even heard about that, and I'll bet you didn't even do any research on what the Orthodox think about it, before coming to an Orthodox board. You just came to spam people.
look, if they did not have the same father (they didn't) and if they did not have the same mother (they didn't), then how could they be half-siblings?

Jesus is called the Son of David, even though Joseph was not his father. So is Jesus really the Son of David?
The Lord Jesus was indeed a son of David in that he was a descendant of David.  He was not a descendant of Joseph

My point was, he was not biologically the Son of David, because he was not Joseph's descendant. Joseph was descendant of King David. By law, He (Christ) was; but biologically, He was not. The Theotokos was not a descendant of King David.

The point being; by law, Christ had half-siblings, even if it was not biologically so.

Why are you saying Mary was not a descendant of David?

The genealogies in the book of Matthew speak of Joseph descending from David, not the Theotokos. When Joseph became the of Jesus legally, his ancestors became the ancestors of Christ legally. He inherited it.
Yes, I understand this, but what about the genealogy in Luke?  To say she is not descended from David, surely you need to refer to a genealogy
Interesting, Mary is descended from David, but not from Solomon.
Logged

If you will, you can become all flame.
Extra caritatem nulla salus.
In order to become whole, take the "I" out of "holiness".
सर्वभूतहित
Ἄνω σχῶμεν τὰς καρδίας
"Those who say religion has nothing to do with politics do not know what religion is." -- Mohandas Gandhi
Y dduw bo'r diolch.
Sarah
Member
***
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Antiochian
Posts: 111


« Reply #254 on: January 03, 2014, 10:48:40 AM »

Wouldn't Joseph's children be Jesus' step-siblings, not half-siblings?
Logged
PeterTheAleut
The Right Blowhard Peter the Furtive of Yetts O'Muckhart
Moderator
Protospatharios
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 31,935


Lord, have mercy on the Christians in Mosul!


« Reply #255 on: January 03, 2014, 02:37:46 PM »

Wouldn't Joseph's children be Jesus' step-siblings, not half-siblings?
A half sibling is a sibling born to the same mother but different father, or same father but different mother. Seeing that the Theotokos was a virgin who had no other children and that Jesus had no earthly father, He would have had no half siblings. Step siblings, otoh, are children whom the Theotokos adopts as her own when she marries Joseph, their father. You are right, then, to state that Joseph's children were indeed Jesus's step siblings.
Logged
mike
Stratopedarches
**************
Offline Offline

Posts: 21,467


WWW
« Reply #256 on: January 03, 2014, 02:44:54 PM »

Jesus was considered to be Joseph's son so Joseph's children were legally His half-siblings.
Logged

Byzantinism
no longer posting here
genesisone
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Antioch
Posts: 2,481



« Reply #257 on: January 03, 2014, 04:37:04 PM »

Jesus was considered to be Joseph's son so Joseph's children were legally His half-siblings.
Michał, that is quite right concerning the legalities. However, the usual understanding in English for "half-sibling" is biological, so really is not a good choice. Do the terms in Polish have the same nuances?
Logged
Gunnarr
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,749



« Reply #258 on: January 07, 2014, 01:17:25 AM »

This is a divisive topic that achieves nothing other than fuelling pride and is a form of trolling.

That is good for these threads, it exercises the brain

wouldnt this forum be so boring if everyone agreed on everything?

I guess you could have called Arius a troll
Logged

I am a demonic servant! Beware!
TheTrisagion
Armed Feline rider of Flaming Unicorns
Warned
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Antiochian
Posts: 7,449



« Reply #259 on: January 07, 2014, 01:19:57 AM »

This is a divisive topic that achieves nothing other than fuelling pride and is a form of trolling.

That is good for these threads, it exercises the brain

wouldnt this forum be so boring if everyone agreed on everything?

I guess you could have called Arius a troll
Arius was a troll.  That is why he needed a good slapping.
Logged

Have you considered the possibility that your face is an ad hominem?
Somebody just went all Jack Chick up in here.
Shanghaiski
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Antiochian
Posts: 7,969


Holy Trinity Church of Gergeti, Georgia


« Reply #260 on: January 07, 2014, 01:38:00 AM »

Jesus had no brothers or sisters, whether half or not.
Surprised that the Orthodox believe he did.

He had brothers and sisters from Joseph's end. Mary didn't conceive but Joseph made many women conceive before he married St. Mary.
"Made many women conceive"? Huh You do realize that our Tradition, AFAIK, does not speculate into Joseph's love life except to acknowledge that he was most likely a widower when he took the Theotokos to be his wife?

Okay, I'm sorry, I didn't know the specifics. I'm really sorry, I shouldn't have been so rash to respond to something I don't have any knowledge of.

It's okay. It was funny. I thought of a certain poster playing Joseph in a hypothetical Nativity scene.
Logged

Quote from: GabrieltheCelt
If you spend long enough on this forum, you'll come away with all sorts of weird, untrue ideas of Orthodox Christianity.
Quote from: orthonorm
I would suggest most persons in general avoid any question beginning with why.
alexpetros
Member
***
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 142


Go sábhála Dia Éire.


WWW
« Reply #261 on: January 07, 2014, 01:50:27 AM »

This is a divisive topic that achieves nothing other than fuelling pride and is a form of trolling.

That is good for these threads, it exercises the brain

wouldnt this forum be so boring if everyone agreed on everything?

I guess you could have called Arius a troll
Arius was a troll.  That is why he needed a good slapping.

Logged
frjohnmorris
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Antiochian
Posts: 1,177


« Reply #262 on: January 16, 2014, 04:55:03 PM »

Oh boy, here we go.

Someone please explain to him about St. Joseph's previous marriage, and what half-siblings are?
but any children Joseph had by a previous marriage would not have been the Lord's half-siblings, unless Joseph himself sired the Lord.  the Lord Jesus had no half-siblings

The Orthodox believe that He did.

Obviously you have no idea what you're talking about. This is probably the first time you even heard about that, and I'll bet you didn't even do any research on what the Orthodox think about it, before coming to an Orthodox board. You just came to spam people.
look, if they did not have the same father (they didn't) and if they did not have the same mother (they didn't), then how could they be half-siblings?

Jesus is called the Son of David, even though Joseph was not his father. So is Jesus really the Son of David?
The Lord Jesus was indeed a son of David in that he was a descendant of David.  He was not a descendant of Joseph

My point was, he was not biologically the Son of David, because he was not Joseph's descendant. Joseph was descendant of King David. By law, He (Christ) was; but biologically, He was not. The Theotokos was not a descendant of King David.

The point being; by law, Christ had half-siblings, even if it was not biologically so.

Yes Mary was a descendant of King David. One married within one's extended family at that time. The Fathers tell us that is why Sts. Matthew and Luke give the genealogy of Christ to St. Joseph.

Fr. John W. Morris

Fr. John W. Morris
Logged
Tags:
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6  All   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.162 seconds with 66 queries.