Author Topic: The Pope to resign?!?! / Pope Benedict XVI resigns / Pope set to resign on Feb. 28th  (Read 19590 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline choy

  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 2,316
You certainly have it out for these guys. Though, yes, I agree. In this particular situation, they are being overly stubborn. Though, given their fear of the state of certain diocese in the Church, I understand why. If I were a traditionalist, say in Boston, I would be very careful.

Definitely, and I'm not denying or hiding it.  I personally think they are responsible for the problems of the RChurch today as much as the liberals are.  See, the straight and narrow path is in the middle, the liberals went too far left, and the traditionalists went too far right.  I hate it when people say, "well, they're better than the liberals."  They're both wrong.  Not because one position is wrong means that taking the extreme opposite position becomes right.  The Church has gone through many trials through history, just look at the 7 Ecumenical Councils.  I can't recall any saint that defended Orthodoxy that displayed the hubris that the SSPX and most other traditional groups are displaying.  I mean, the RCChurch has the FSSP.  The SSPX is completely expendible.
How do you feel about groups like the Old Believers, Old Calanderists, etc. ?

Are they in communion with the Orthodox Church?

Offline Papist

  • Patriarch of Pontification
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 12,654
  • Praying for the Christians in Iraq
You certainly have it out for these guys. Though, yes, I agree. In this particular situation, they are being overly stubborn. Though, given their fear of the state of certain diocese in the Church, I understand why. If I were a traditionalist, say in Boston, I would be very careful.

Definitely, and I'm not denying or hiding it.  I personally think they are responsible for the problems of the RChurch today as much as the liberals are.  See, the straight and narrow path is in the middle, the liberals went too far left, and the traditionalists went too far right.  I hate it when people say, "well, they're better than the liberals."  They're both wrong.  Not because one position is wrong means that taking the extreme opposite position becomes right.  The Church has gone through many trials through history, just look at the 7 Ecumenical Councils.  I can't recall any saint that defended Orthodoxy that displayed the hubris that the SSPX and most other traditional groups are displaying.  I mean, the RCChurch has the FSSP.  The SSPX is completely expendible.
How do you feel about groups like the Old Believers, Old Calanderists, etc. ?

Are they in communion with the Orthodox Church?
Old Calanderists are.
You are right. I apologize for having sacked Constantinople. I really need to stop doing that.

Offline Jetavan

  • Argumentum ad australopithecum
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,580
  • Barlaam and Josaphat
    • The Mystical Theology
Colbert on the recent developments.
If you will, you can become all flame.
Extra caritatem nulla salus.
In order to become whole, take the "I" out of "holiness".
सर्वभूतहित
Ἄνω σχῶμεν τὰς καρδίας
"Those who say religion has nothing to do with politics do not know what religion is." -- Mohandas Gandhi
Y dduw bo'r diolch.

Offline Shiny

  • Site Supporter
  • Toumarches
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,267
  • Paint It Red
You certainly have it out for these guys. Though, yes, I agree. In this particular situation, they are being overly stubborn. Though, given their fear of the state of certain diocese in the Church, I understand why. If I were a traditionalist, say in Boston, I would be very careful.

Definitely, and I'm not denying or hiding it.  I personally think they are responsible for the problems of the RChurch today as much as the liberals are.  See, the straight and narrow path is in the middle, the liberals went too far left, and the traditionalists went too far right.  I hate it when people say, "well, they're better than the liberals."  They're both wrong.  Not because one position is wrong means that taking the extreme opposite position becomes right.  The Church has gone through many trials through history, just look at the 7 Ecumenical Councils.  I can't recall any saint that defended Orthodoxy that displayed the hubris that the SSPX and most other traditional groups are displaying.  I mean, the RCChurch has the FSSP.  The SSPX is completely expendible.
How do you feel about groups like the Old Believers, Old Calanderists, etc. ?

Are they in communion with the Orthodox Church?
Old Calanderists are.
You gonna open that can of worms here?
“There is your brother, naked, crying, and you stand there confused over the choice of an attractive floor covering.”

– St. Ambrose of Milan

Online Justin Kissel

  • Formerly a *, now a ☆
  • Protospatharios
  • ****************
  • Posts: 31,038
  • Faith: Agnosticish
You certainly have it out for these guys. Though, yes, I agree. In this particular situation, they are being overly stubborn. Though, given their fear of the state of certain diocese in the Church, I understand why. If I were a traditionalist, say in Boston, I would be very careful.

Definitely, and I'm not denying or hiding it.  I personally think they are responsible for the problems of the RChurch today as much as the liberals are.  See, the straight and narrow path is in the middle, the liberals went too far left, and the traditionalists went too far right.  I hate it when people say, "well, they're better than the liberals."  They're both wrong.  Not because one position is wrong means that taking the extreme opposite position becomes right.  The Church has gone through many trials through history, just look at the 7 Ecumenical Councils.  I can't recall any saint that defended Orthodoxy that displayed the hubris that the SSPX and most other traditional groups are displaying.  I mean, the RCChurch has the FSSP.  The SSPX is completely expendible.
How do you feel about groups like the Old Believers, Old Calanderists, etc. ?

Are they in communion with the Orthodox Church?
Old Calanderists are.

Just a clarification: people on the old calendar are (Serbia, Georgia, Russia, etc.) Old calendarists, however, are not. On the other hand some old believers are, if I understand the relationship between at least one group and ROCOR properly, while most aren't. Seems confusing.
"One part dream, one part sound business decision"

Offline choy

  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 2,316
Papist, if I may add.  I understand what the SSPX is fighting for and I understand why.  But there is a right way of doing things and a wrong way of doing things.  Fighting for traditionalism doesn't justify how you do it.  As Jesus Christ said, by their fruits you will know them.  So how can I personally believe that Traditionalism is righteous if the manner they promote it is very anti-Christian.  Isn't charity a traditional Christian value?  Isn't love part of traditional Christianity?  Isn't humility?  To me what I see in them and many followers of the Traditional movement is just empty Christianity.  They are after the spelndor of the Rites without necessarily living the spirituality.  Being a Christian is about living according to the life of God, not about whether you have the prayers at the foot of the altar or not, not whether you receive Communion kneeling or standing, etc.  Orthodoxy and Eastern Catholicism are both trying to rediscover ancient roots as well.  ECs are reversing Latinizations, Orthodoxy trying to look at the pre-Turkish Yoke traditions, etc.  But I've never seen them approach this dialogue on restoring tradition the way the Tradtionalist movement in the RC has.  Yes, we have to be honest about the issues, but there is a line between being honest and being just outright mean.

Offline choy

  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 2,316
You certainly have it out for these guys. Though, yes, I agree. In this particular situation, they are being overly stubborn. Though, given their fear of the state of certain diocese in the Church, I understand why. If I were a traditionalist, say in Boston, I would be very careful.

Definitely, and I'm not denying or hiding it.  I personally think they are responsible for the problems of the RChurch today as much as the liberals are.  See, the straight and narrow path is in the middle, the liberals went too far left, and the traditionalists went too far right.  I hate it when people say, "well, they're better than the liberals."  They're both wrong.  Not because one position is wrong means that taking the extreme opposite position becomes right.  The Church has gone through many trials through history, just look at the 7 Ecumenical Councils.  I can't recall any saint that defended Orthodoxy that displayed the hubris that the SSPX and most other traditional groups are displaying.  I mean, the RCChurch has the FSSP.  The SSPX is completely expendible.
How do you feel about groups like the Old Believers, Old Calanderists, etc. ?

Are they in communion with the Orthodox Church?
Old Calanderists are.

Aren't you confusing Old Calendarists with those who just follow the Old Calendar?

Offline Maria

  • Orthodox Christian
  • Merarches
  • ***********
  • Posts: 10,532
  • O most Holy Theotokos, save us.
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: GOC
Back on topic:

Several news services said that people in Rome today gave a standing ovation to the pope.

Here is one source:

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2013/02/pope-benedict-xvi-gets-standing-ovation.html


Quote
The pope told the crowd that he was "well aware of the seriousness of this act, but also aware of the fact that I am no longer capable of carrying out Peter's Ministry with the strength needed." He's sticking around long enough to kick off the Easter season, and will deliver Ash Wednesday mass today, but he's giving up the papacy for Lent and beyond.






« Last Edit: February 13, 2013, 10:58:39 PM by Maria »
Glory to Jesus Christ!
Glory to Him forever!

Offline Peter J

  • Formerly PJ
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,194
You certainly have it out for these guys. Though, yes, I agree. In this particular situation, they are being overly stubborn. Though, given their fear of the state of certain diocese in the Church, I understand why. If I were a traditionalist, say in Boston, I would be very careful.

Definitely, and I'm not denying or hiding it.  I personally think they are responsible for the problems of the RChurch today as much as the liberals are.  See, the straight and narrow path is in the middle,

If by "the middle" you mean the neo-conservative Catholics, then I must say that they can be quite problematic too. Actually, one of the (few?) things I like about the SSPX is their keen ability to point out the problems of the neo-conservatives.
- Peter Jericho (a CAF poster)

Offline lubeltri

  • Latin Catholic layman
  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 3,795
You certainly have it out for these guys. Though, yes, I agree. In this particular situation, they are being overly stubborn. Though, given their fear of the state of certain diocese in the Church, I understand why. If I were a traditionalist, say in Boston, I would be very careful.

We'll be okay.  :) As a matter of fact, I was at Boston's Cathedral of the Holy Cross tonight for Ash Wednesday Mass---according to the Extraordinary Form. The celebrant was a Franciscan Friar of the Primitive Observance, who are based in this Archdiocese. There's lot of opportunities for the traditional Mass around here, and there are some reverent Novus Ordo parishes and shrines in the city and plenty of opportunities for confession and adoration. There's the renowned Archdiocesan Choir School of boys at St. Paul's in Harvard Square (where we in the Harvard Univ. Knights of Columbus have been sponsoring traditional Masses). Boston also has an Anglican Use church and lots of Eastern Catholic churches.

Now that I think of it, I don't know where (or if) the SSPX have a presence here. After all, who needs the SSPX when you have the Feeneyites (who are now regularized and located out in Still River, Mass.)?  ;)  http://www.saintbenedict.com/

Now, the SSPX does have a huge presence in my hometown diocese in upstate New York, and considering the appalling state of that place, I don't begrudge them for a minute. They have a purpose, and the sooner the canonical stuff is settled, the better.

Offline Sakeneko

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 152
A few points for the non-Orthodox or Orthodox but confused among us <G>:

* THE "OLD CALENDAR".  The "old calendar" is simply the Julian Calendar in use in most of Europe til the "new calendar" (the Gregorian Calendar) was adopted by the Catholic church and, later, most of Europe and its colonies.  Most Orthodox Christians use ("are on") the old calendar for church feasts, fasts, etc.  In the early 20th century, a synod of several national Orthodox churches agreed to adopt a calendar that is usually called the "Revised Julian Calendar".  It retains the traditional Orthodox dates for Pascha and associated holidays, but otherwise closely matches the Gregorian calendar.  Romania, Greece, the U.S., Finland and a few other countries use the modified Gregorian/New Julian "New Calendar".  Russia, most of Eastern Europe, and most Arab and North African Chalcedonian Orthodox Churches use the Julian "Old Calendar". These groups commune with one another and recognize the others as parts of the Church. Both groups are Orthodox, not Catholic.

* THE "OLD CALENDRISTS".  Some Orthodox Christians reject a number of changes that the larger Orthodox churches have made since the early 20th century in the calendar, but also with other aspects of church practice and discipline.  These are usually what is meant by "old calendrists".  Some of them are in communion with the large national Orthodox churches.  Some are not.  The ones that are not in communion with the large national Orthodox churches may not recognize the large national Orthodox churches as Orthodox or parts of the Church.  The large national Orthodox Churches, in turn, generally view the traditionalist "old calendar" churches that reject communion with them as schismatic. But both sides are Orthodox, not Catholic.

* THE "OLD BELIEVERS" (AKA "OLD RITUALISTS").  In Russia, during the reign of Peter the Great, the patriarch Nikon ordered certain changes to be made to church discipline and practices.  A fairly large number of Russian Orthodox (25% or more) refused to go along, and broke from the Russian Orthodox Church over these changes.  Like the "old calendrists", the "old believers" are traditionalists who refused to accept changes ordered by the bishops of their church, but the schism occurred during the middle and late 1600s instead of the early and middle 1900s.  One group of old believers reunified with the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia (ROCOR) while it was still out of communion with the Moscow-based Russian Orthodox Church, and thereby ended up back in communion with the main Russian Orthodox Church when ROCOR and the ROC reconciled in 2007.  Most "old believers" are still not in communion with the ROC, and the ROC and most other Orthodox churches view them as schismatic.  They are Orthodox, however, not Catholic.

The Catholic Church (i.e. all traditional Christian churches that recognize the Roman Pope as their supreme leader on earth) has its schisms and its problems, but these particular schisms and any problems associated with them are our own.  Unfortunately. <sigh>

Lord, have mercy!

Offline choy

  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 2,316
You certainly have it out for these guys. Though, yes, I agree. In this particular situation, they are being overly stubborn. Though, given their fear of the state of certain diocese in the Church, I understand why. If I were a traditionalist, say in Boston, I would be very careful.

Definitely, and I'm not denying or hiding it.  I personally think they are responsible for the problems of the RChurch today as much as the liberals are.  See, the straight and narrow path is in the middle,

If by "the middle" you mean the neo-conservative Catholics, then I must say that they can be quite problematic too. Actually, one of the (few?) things I like about the SSPX is their keen ability to point out the problems of the neo-conservatives.

If I think the middle can be found in the Roman Catholic Church, shouldn't I still be Roman Catholic right now?

Offline choy

  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 2,316

Offline Peter J

  • Formerly PJ
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,194
You certainly have it out for these guys. Though, yes, I agree. In this particular situation, they are being overly stubborn. Though, given their fear of the state of certain diocese in the Church, I understand why. If I were a traditionalist, say in Boston, I would be very careful.

Definitely, and I'm not denying or hiding it.  I personally think they are responsible for the problems of the RChurch today as much as the liberals are.  See, the straight and narrow path is in the middle,

If by "the middle" you mean the neo-conservative Catholics, then I must say that they can be quite problematic too. Actually, one of the (few?) things I like about the SSPX is their keen ability to point out the problems of the neo-conservatives.

If I think the middle can be found in the Roman Catholic Church, shouldn't I still be Roman Catholic right now?

:)

Oh wait ...
- Peter Jericho (a CAF poster)

Offline Papist

  • Patriarch of Pontification
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 12,654
  • Praying for the Christians in Iraq
You certainly have it out for these guys. Though, yes, I agree. In this particular situation, they are being overly stubborn. Though, given their fear of the state of certain diocese in the Church, I understand why. If I were a traditionalist, say in Boston, I would be very careful.

We'll be okay.  :) As a matter of fact, I was at Boston's Cathedral of the Holy Cross tonight for Ash Wednesday Mass---according to the Extraordinary Form. The celebrant was a Franciscan Friar of the Primitive Observance, who are based in this Archdiocese. There's lot of opportunities for the traditional Mass around here, and there are some reverent Novus Ordo parishes and shrines in the city and plenty of opportunities for confession and adoration. There's the renowned Archdiocesan Choir School of boys at St. Paul's in Harvard Square (where we in the Harvard Univ. Knights of Columbus have been sponsoring traditional Masses). Boston also has an Anglican Use church and lots of Eastern Catholic churches.

Now that I think of it, I don't know where (or if) the SSPX have a presence here. After all, who needs the SSPX when you have the Feeneyites (who are now regularized and located out in Still River, Mass.)?  ;)  http://www.saintbenedict.com/

Now, the SSPX does have a huge presence in my hometown diocese in upstate New York, and considering the appalling state of that place, I don't begrudge them for a minute. They have a purpose, and the sooner the canonical stuff is settled, the better.
I don't begrude them that either. :)
You are right. I apologize for having sacked Constantinople. I really need to stop doing that.

Offline Papist

  • Patriarch of Pontification
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 12,654
  • Praying for the Christians in Iraq
You certainly have it out for these guys. Though, yes, I agree. In this particular situation, they are being overly stubborn. Though, given their fear of the state of certain diocese in the Church, I understand why. If I were a traditionalist, say in Boston, I would be very careful.

Definitely, and I'm not denying or hiding it.  I personally think they are responsible for the problems of the RChurch today as much as the liberals are.  See, the straight and narrow path is in the middle,

If by "the middle" you mean the neo-conservative Catholics, then I must say that they can be quite problematic too. Actually, one of the (few?) things I like about the SSPX is their keen ability to point out the problems of the neo-conservatives.

If I think the middle can be found in the Roman Catholic Church, shouldn't I still be Roman Catholic right now?
Yes you sould. But that's another conversation altogether.  ;D
You are right. I apologize for having sacked Constantinople. I really need to stop doing that.

Offline J Michael

  • Older than dirt; dumber than a box of rocks; colossally ignorant; a little crazy ;-)
  • Merarches
  • ***********
  • Posts: 10,397
  • Lord, have mercy! I live under a rock. Alleluia!
You certainly have it out for these guys. Though, yes, I agree. In this particular situation, they are being overly stubborn. Though, given their fear of the state of certain diocese in the Church, I understand why. If I were a traditionalist, say in Boston, I would be very careful.

Definitely, and I'm not denying or hiding it.  I personally think they are responsible for the problems of the RChurch today as much as the liberals are.  See, the straight and narrow path is in the middle,

If by "the middle" you mean the neo-conservative Catholics, then I must say that they can be quite problematic too. Actually, one of the (few?) things I like about the SSPX is their keen ability to point out the problems of the neo-conservatives.

If I think the middle can be found in the Roman Catholic Church, shouldn't I still be Roman Catholic right now?

Maybe you just haven't looked hard enough.... ;)
"May Thy Cross, O Lord, in which I seek refuge, be for me a bridge across the great river of fire.  May I pass along it to the habitation of life." ~St. Ephraim the Syrian

"Sometimes you're the windshield.  Sometimes you're the bug." ~ Mark Knopfler (?)

Offline J Michael

  • Older than dirt; dumber than a box of rocks; colossally ignorant; a little crazy ;-)
  • Merarches
  • ***********
  • Posts: 10,397
  • Lord, have mercy! I live under a rock. Alleluia!
They (SSPX) have a purpose

So does Judas.

So does my cat Ziggy  ;D.

So does...............well, you name it.
"May Thy Cross, O Lord, in which I seek refuge, be for me a bridge across the great river of fire.  May I pass along it to the habitation of life." ~St. Ephraim the Syrian

"Sometimes you're the windshield.  Sometimes you're the bug." ~ Mark Knopfler (?)

Offline biro

  • Excelsior
  • Site Supporter
  • Hoplitarches
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,658
    • Alaska Volcanoes
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: GOAA
Noted: the Pope has a cat.

Does the next Pope inherit the cat? Or does the College of Cardinals elect a new one?
He will come again with glory to judge the living and the dead. His kingdom will have no end.

--

And if I seem a little strange, well, that's because I am

--

If you wish to contact me, please use the information in my profile.

Offline Jetavan

  • Argumentum ad australopithecum
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,580
  • Barlaam and Josaphat
    • The Mystical Theology
Noted: the Pope has a cat.

Does the next Pope inherit the cat? Or does the College of Cardinals elect a new one?
No need to be dogmatic about it.
If you will, you can become all flame.
Extra caritatem nulla salus.
In order to become whole, take the "I" out of "holiness".
सर्वभूतहित
Ἄνω σχῶμεν τὰς καρδίας
"Those who say religion has nothing to do with politics do not know what religion is." -- Mohandas Gandhi
Y dduw bo'r diolch.

Offline choy

  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 2,316
Noted: the Pope has a cat.

Does the next Pope inherit the cat? Or does the College of Cardinals elect a new one?
No need to be DOGmatic about it.

Fixed!!!

Offline CoptoGeek

  • of Alexandria, the Christ-loving City
  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,464
Noted: the Pope has a cat.

Does the next Pope inherit the cat? Or does the College of Cardinals elect a new one?
No need to be DOGmatic about it.

Fixed!!!

Nice!
"Be oppressed, rather than the oppressor. Be gentle, rather than zealous. Lay hold of goodness, rather than justice." -St. Isaac of Nineveh

“I returned to the Coptic Orthodox Church with affection, finding in her our tormented and broken history“. -Salama Moussa

Offline James2

  • Mr.
  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 753
Noted: the Pope has a cat.

Does the next Pope inherit the cat? Or does the College of Cardinals elect a new one?
No need to be DOGmatic about it.

Fixed!!!

Nice!

Which raises the question, is CATholic DOGma a contradiction in terms?  :D

Offline minasoliman

  • Mr., Sir, Dude, Guy, Male, tr. Minas in Greek, Menes in white people Egyptologists :-P
  • Section Moderator
  • Toumarches
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,201
  • Strengthen O Lord the work of Your hands(Is 19:25)
Noted: the Pope has a cat.

Does the next Pope inherit the cat? Or does the College of Cardinals elect a new one?
No need to be DOGmatic about it.

Fixed!!!

Nice!

Which raises the question, is CATholic DOGma a contradiction in terms?  :D
touche
Vain existence can never exist, for "unless the LORD builds the house, the builders labor in vain." (Psalm 127)

If the faith is unchanged and rock solid, then the gates of Hades never prevailed in the end.

Offline brastaseptim

  • Protopsáltis
  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 952
  • From BBC Louisiana to you, here's the morning news
Hmmm... personally, I've always like the idea of an African Pope being elected. Instead of shouting "Habemus Papam", the college of cardinals can hold him above the Vatican balcony while Lebo M. starts singing "Circle of Life."  ;D
BBC news certified; The Guardian rejected; OC.net approved.

Offline Shiny

  • Site Supporter
  • Toumarches
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,267
  • Paint It Red
"True Catholics always pull out early." -Pope Benedict XVI

 :police:

So whose picking him up in free agency? The Cardinals or Saints?
“There is your brother, naked, crying, and you stand there confused over the choice of an attractive floor covering.”

– St. Ambrose of Milan

Offline Jetavan

  • Argumentum ad australopithecum
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,580
  • Barlaam and Josaphat
    • The Mystical Theology
"True Catholics always pull out early." -Pope Benedict XVI

 :police:

So whose picking him up in free agency? The Cardinals or Saints?
The Angels.
If you will, you can become all flame.
Extra caritatem nulla salus.
In order to become whole, take the "I" out of "holiness".
सर्वभूतहित
Ἄνω σχῶμεν τὰς καρδίας
"Those who say religion has nothing to do with politics do not know what religion is." -- Mohandas Gandhi
Y dduw bo'r diolch.

Offline Jetavan

  • Argumentum ad australopithecum
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,580
  • Barlaam and Josaphat
    • The Mystical Theology
"Earlier this week, I suggested that because the end of Benedict XVI’s papacy is not occurring in tandem with his death, it may create greater psychological space for cardinals to take a critical look at the pontificate, without fear of speaking ill of the late pontiff.

A small confirmation of that theory has come in the form of an interview given to a German newspaper by Cardinal Joachim Meisner of Cologne, one of Benedict’s closest friends in the College of Cardinals.
....
In response to another question, Meisner said the next pope should have Benedict’s intellectual and cultural depth, but be a younger man – “No more than 70,” he’s quoted as saying."
« Last Edit: February 15, 2013, 08:15:55 AM by Jetavan »
If you will, you can become all flame.
Extra caritatem nulla salus.
In order to become whole, take the "I" out of "holiness".
सर्वभूतहित
Ἄνω σχῶμεν τὰς καρδίας
"Those who say religion has nothing to do with politics do not know what religion is." -- Mohandas Gandhi
Y dduw bo'r diolch.

Offline Peter J

  • Formerly PJ
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,194
"True Catholics always pull out early." -Pope Benedict XVI

 :police:

If you mean this as a reference to NFP, then you don't understand NFP at all. Just saying.
- Peter Jericho (a CAF poster)

Offline J Michael

  • Older than dirt; dumber than a box of rocks; colossally ignorant; a little crazy ;-)
  • Merarches
  • ***********
  • Posts: 10,397
  • Lord, have mercy! I live under a rock. Alleluia!
"True Catholics always pull out early." -Pope Benedict XVI

 :police:

If you mean this as a reference to NFP, then you don't understand NFP at all. Just saying.

The lack of a citation for the quote should tell you something.
« Last Edit: February 15, 2013, 02:01:09 PM by J Michael »
"May Thy Cross, O Lord, in which I seek refuge, be for me a bridge across the great river of fire.  May I pass along it to the habitation of life." ~St. Ephraim the Syrian

"Sometimes you're the windshield.  Sometimes you're the bug." ~ Mark Knopfler (?)

Offline Jetavan

  • Argumentum ad australopithecum
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,580
  • Barlaam and Josaphat
    • The Mystical Theology
"True Catholics always pull out early." -Pope Benedict XVI

 :police:

If you mean this as a reference to NFP, then you don't understand NFP at all. Just saying.
I think coitus interruptus is a sin, in Catholicism.
If you will, you can become all flame.
Extra caritatem nulla salus.
In order to become whole, take the "I" out of "holiness".
सर्वभूतहित
Ἄνω σχῶμεν τὰς καρδίας
"Those who say religion has nothing to do with politics do not know what religion is." -- Mohandas Gandhi
Y dduw bo'r diolch.

Offline J Michael

  • Older than dirt; dumber than a box of rocks; colossally ignorant; a little crazy ;-)
  • Merarches
  • ***********
  • Posts: 10,397
  • Lord, have mercy! I live under a rock. Alleluia!
"True Catholics always pull out early." -Pope Benedict XVI




Since you attributed, by way of quotation marks, the above highlighted words to Pope Benedict XVI, would you be so kind as to cite the source?
"May Thy Cross, O Lord, in which I seek refuge, be for me a bridge across the great river of fire.  May I pass along it to the habitation of life." ~St. Ephraim the Syrian

"Sometimes you're the windshield.  Sometimes you're the bug." ~ Mark Knopfler (?)

Offline choy

  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 2,316
So whose picking him up in free agency? The Cardinals or Saints?

The Cardinals (NFL) are in heresy.  Look at their coach.

Offline That person

  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,160
  • Long live Commie Superman
"True Catholics always pull out early." -Pope Benedict XVI




Since you attributed, by way of quotation marks, the above highlighted words to Pope Benedict XVI, would you be so kind as to cite the source?
I believe it was just a joke.
"Some have such command of their bowels, that they can break wind continuously at pleasure, so as to produce the effect of singing."- St. Augustine of Hippo

Movie reviews you can trust.

Offline Peter J

  • Formerly PJ
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,194
"True Catholics always pull out early." -Pope Benedict XVI

 :police:

If you mean this as a reference to NFP, then you don't understand NFP at all. Just saying.
I think coitus interruptus is a sin, in Catholicism.

Exactly.

I believe it was just a joke.

I'm quite certain it was (which is why I didn't take him to task putting words in the pope's mouth) as suggested by the ":police:" but I still wanted to set the record straight.
- Peter Jericho (a CAF poster)

Offline J Michael

  • Older than dirt; dumber than a box of rocks; colossally ignorant; a little crazy ;-)
  • Merarches
  • ***********
  • Posts: 10,397
  • Lord, have mercy! I live under a rock. Alleluia!
"True Catholics always pull out early." -Pope Benedict XVI

 :police:

If you mean this as a reference to NFP, then you don't understand NFP at all. Just saying.
I think coitus interruptus is a sin, in Catholicism.

Exactly.

I believe it was just a joke.

I'm quite certain it was (which is why I didn't take him to task putting words in the pope's mouth) as suggested by the ":police:" but I still wanted to set the record straight.

Oh, I'm pretty sure he meant it as a joke.  Some jokes, however, are more tasteful than others.  This one was in particularly bad taste, imho.  That's why I called him on it.
« Last Edit: February 15, 2013, 03:54:41 PM by J Michael »
"May Thy Cross, O Lord, in which I seek refuge, be for me a bridge across the great river of fire.  May I pass along it to the habitation of life." ~St. Ephraim the Syrian

"Sometimes you're the windshield.  Sometimes you're the bug." ~ Mark Knopfler (?)

Offline Cyrillic

  • Merarches
  • ***********
  • Posts: 10,475
  • Cyrillico est imperare orbi universo
Pope Benedict XVI pulled out early too out of the papacy.
« Last Edit: February 15, 2013, 03:54:55 PM by Cyrillic »
"My idea of an agreeable person is a person who agrees with me"
-Benjamin Disraeli

Offline choy

  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 2,316
Pope Benedict XVI pulled out early too out of the papacy.

 ;D

Post of the Month candidate?  ;D

Offline Shiny

  • Site Supporter
  • Toumarches
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,267
  • Paint It Red
Yeah it's a joke.

And the reason why I made it is because I know how controversial different forms of birth control are to RCs.
“There is your brother, naked, crying, and you stand there confused over the choice of an attractive floor covering.”

– St. Ambrose of Milan

Offline J Michael

  • Older than dirt; dumber than a box of rocks; colossally ignorant; a little crazy ;-)
  • Merarches
  • ***********
  • Posts: 10,397
  • Lord, have mercy! I live under a rock. Alleluia!
Yeah it's a joke.

And the reason why I made it is because I know how controversial different forms of birth control are to RCs.

So, you're just stirring things up in a tasteless manner about a topic that is pretty irrelevant to Pope Benedict resigning?  Got it.
"May Thy Cross, O Lord, in which I seek refuge, be for me a bridge across the great river of fire.  May I pass along it to the habitation of life." ~St. Ephraim the Syrian

"Sometimes you're the windshield.  Sometimes you're the bug." ~ Mark Knopfler (?)

Offline Schultz

  • Christian. Guitarist. Scooterist. Zymurgist. Librarian.
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,534
  • Scion of the McKeesport Becks.
"True Catholics always pull out early." -Pope Benedict XVI

 :police:

If you mean this as a reference to NFP, then you don't understand NFP at all. Just saying.
I think coitus interruptus is a sin, in Catholicism.

Exactly.

I believe it was just a joke.

I'm quite certain it was (which is why I didn't take him to task putting words in the pope's mouth) as suggested by the ":police:" but I still wanted to set the record straight.

Oh, I'm pretty sure he meant it as a joke.  Some jokes, however, are more tasteful than others.  This one was in particularly bad taste, imho.  That's why I called him on it.

It's not in bad taste.

It's just plain bad.  Like really bad.  Like someone should be pulling him off stage with a big hook bad.
"Hearing a nun's confession is like being stoned to death with popcorn." --Abp. Fulton Sheen

Offline J Michael

  • Older than dirt; dumber than a box of rocks; colossally ignorant; a little crazy ;-)
  • Merarches
  • ***********
  • Posts: 10,397
  • Lord, have mercy! I live under a rock. Alleluia!
"True Catholics always pull out early." -Pope Benedict XVI

 :police:

If you mean this as a reference to NFP, then you don't understand NFP at all. Just saying.
I think coitus interruptus is a sin, in Catholicism.

Exactly.

I believe it was just a joke.

I'm quite certain it was (which is why I didn't take him to task putting words in the pope's mouth) as suggested by the ":police:" but I still wanted to set the record straight.

Oh, I'm pretty sure he meant it as a joke.  Some jokes, however, are more tasteful than others.  This one was in particularly bad taste, imho.  That's why I called him on it.

It's not in bad taste.

It's just plain bad.  Like really bad.  Like someone should be pulling him off stage with a big hook bad.

Yeah, it is in bad taste and offensive.  AND it's really bad.  
« Last Edit: February 15, 2013, 04:49:35 PM by J Michael »
"May Thy Cross, O Lord, in which I seek refuge, be for me a bridge across the great river of fire.  May I pass along it to the habitation of life." ~St. Ephraim the Syrian

"Sometimes you're the windshield.  Sometimes you're the bug." ~ Mark Knopfler (?)

Offline choy

  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 2,316
Pope Benedict XVI pulled out early too out of the papacy.

On another note, you can't make that claim.  Pope Benedict infallibly declared he pulled out of the papacy at the right time  ;D

Offline Jetavan

  • Argumentum ad australopithecum
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,580
  • Barlaam and Josaphat
    • The Mystical Theology
Quote
Benedict XVI, who as Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger was asked on Bavarian television in 1997 if the Holy Spirit is responsible for who gets elected. This was his response:

I would not say so, in the sense that the Holy Spirit picks out the Pope. ... I would say that the Spirit does not exactly take control of the affair, but rather like a good educator, as it were, leaves us much space, much freedom, without entirely abandoning us. Thus the Spirit's role should be understood in a much more elastic sense, not that he dictates the candidate for whom one must vote. Probably the only assurance he offers is that the thing cannot be totally ruined.

Then the clincher:

There are too many contrary instances of popes the Holy Spirit obviously would not have picked!
If you will, you can become all flame.
Extra caritatem nulla salus.
In order to become whole, take the "I" out of "holiness".
सर्वभूतहित
Ἄνω σχῶμεν τὰς καρδίας
"Those who say religion has nothing to do with politics do not know what religion is." -- Mohandas Gandhi
Y dduw bo'r diolch.

Online Arachne

  • Trinary Unit || Resident Bossy Boots
  • Section Moderator
  • Protokentarchos
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,251
  • Now with bigger boots!
  • Faith: Cradle Greek Orthodox. Cope.
  • Jurisdiction: Antiochian Archdiocese, UK
Noted: the Pope has a cat.

Does the next Pope inherit the cat? Or does the College of Cardinals elect a new one?

Is it the Pope's cat or the Vatican cat? Like, you know, official 10 Downing St. cat, with lifelong tenure?
'When you live your path all the time, you end up with both more path and more time.'~Venecia Rauls

Blog ~ Bookshelf ~ Jukebox