Many fools for christ were naked, are we supposed to say "no" to them??
I've never met any fools for Christ, but I've known quite a few fools. Definitely, just say no to those.
I dont think nathaniel is a fool for christ, I dont like his opinions very much he sounds like a nut job
but just saying "no" because of an image does not make much sense, "DONT JUDGE A BOOK BY ITS COVER" - St. Anonymous
But a book's cover doesn't necessarily tell you anything about the quality of the book, which is why we have that saying. A monastic novice, on the other hand, does not dress like "Brother" "Nathanael". So if the latter presents himself the way he does, I'd say yes, in fact we can and should "judge" him. Habitus non facit monachum, but it's a pretty good indicator.
That fancy latin phrase changed my mind, I think you are right
I CHANGE MY OPINION
no fool for christ dressed up as a monk while not being one! tHEREFORE, all those dressed up as monks who are not monks must be ignored!
Therefor, bang! (although, that is restricting any future fools for christ... oh well, they should know better and stick to being naked like the stories told, those fools being foolish)
thank you, your dialogue has changed a mind
a good thing i did not keep my opinion for three times