I confess I do not regularly watch Brother Nathaniel's videos
To be fair, neither do I follow Abraham Foxman (of the Anti-Defamation League), but I do give him credit for acquiring sobriety over time.
A time existed not so long ago when the mere mention of Nazi-Zionist cooperation would enrage most pro-Israeli Jews like the ADL or the Simon Wiesenthal Centre. However, having come to terms with historical facts, Foxman actually came around to acknowledging and even wholeheartedly supporting the 1934 Nazi-Zionist agreement and authored the Afterword
to the 25th anniversary edition of Edwin Black's book on the subject 'The Transfer Agreement'
Unlike Edwin Black who is pro-Israel and thinks highly of the agreement made with the Nazis, Lenni Brenner (a Jewish Marxist) has written books on the same history from a perspective which is critical of the Nazis and the leaders of the Israeli statehood movement. http://www.marxists.org/history/etol/document/mideast/agedict/notice.htm
While I do not concur with condemnations of Brother Nathaniel's videos, by way of constructive criticism, I think that Brother Nathaniel's videos might come off as much more well rounded if he included a few more Jewish as well as leftist sources that consolidated and perhaps even developed his perspective.
Other considerations of which he is aware and would do well to emphasize a bit more often: 1)
Demons are the enemies at the most fundamental level of conspiracy - not jews who are flesh and blood men just like us. 2)
Biblically, gentile power has ruled the world ever since Nebuchadnezzar conquered Jerusalem and God spake to the Jews through the Prophet Habakkuk saying "Ye are not my people, and I am not your God." The world is still ruled by gentile power, and no amount of Jewish conspiracy (real or imagined) will change that until the appointed time when the Jews are regathered as outlined by the prophet Ezekiel. 3)
The distinction between Jews and Zionists should be emphasized. Conservative critics of Zionism particularly come off as racist when they make crudely worded statements about the "Jews" behind a given problem when they could easily be more specific. 4)
Many Jews and others consider it hypocritical to criticize the crimes of Israel while looking the other way at the crimes of other states such as Saudi Arabia, Armenia, or Greece among others. I would agree with that. We could go into details, but all modern states are evil - not merely Israel. Saudi Arabia, for example, is easily more barbaric than Israel. Nationalism and modern statehood is a part of world apostasy.
5) I rather agree with the Jewish majority who disbelieves theories about Jewish genetics. in 'War Against the Weak', Edwin Black wrote about the scientistic racist eugenics movement in America and Germany which is the direct father of the modern genetics which is so now touted as an exact and irrefutable science (i.e. DNA) just as eugenics was previously.http://www.waragainsttheweak.com
I believe that the Protocols of Zion are genuine. However, once these documents were endorsed as genuine by fascists like Adolf Hitler and Henry Ford, only a maverick anti-capitalist would bother to read them. Critics of Zionism like Brother Nathaniel would do themselves a favor to become more familiar with the rich literature of the political left against Zionism that is more sophisticated and logical than the bone-headed racial theories of the 1920's that smack of Social Darwinism.