Author Topic: Dawkins v Williams: the Union debate (Feb. 2013)  (Read 830 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jetavan

  • Argumentum ad australopithecum
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,580
  • Barlaam and Josaphat
    • The Mystical Theology
Dawkins v Williams: the Union debate (Feb. 2013)
« on: February 04, 2013, 09:10:13 AM »
Quote
Richard Dawwwkins!”, came the cry of a student as the six speakers entered the chamber last night. The eager greeting was emblematic of the excitement which surrounded the Cambridge Union’s debate last night. The prospect of a clash between celebrated thinkers Richard Dawkins and new Master of Magdalene Rowan Williams on the motion ‘this house believes religion has no place in the 21st century’ culminated in this term’s most popular debate.

A thousand students were watching, the Union’s President-elect told the crowd, many unable to get a place in the chamber but following the debate in rooms around the building. Hundreds more had been turned away, with lines stretching into the streets since late afternoon.
....
"I have to declare something of an interest here”, Williams began, alluding to his long career in the Church of England, before setting forth his argument for religion’s continuing role in the 21st century. “Religion has always been a matter of community building,” he said, “a matter of building precisely those relations of compassion, fellow feeling and, I dare to use the word, inclusion, which would otherwise be absent from our societies."

A youtube video of the debate (which I think is not the official video of the debate) is here.
« Last Edit: February 04, 2013, 09:11:17 AM by Jetavan »
If you will, you can become all flame.
Extra caritatem nulla salus.
In order to become whole, take the "I" out of "holiness".
सर्वभूतहित
Ἄνω σχῶμεν τὰς καρδίας
"Those who say religion has nothing to do with politics do not know what religion is." -- Mohandas Gandhi
Y dduw bo'r diolch.

Offline stavros_388

  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,322
Re: Dawkins v Williams: the Union debate (Feb. 2013)
« Reply #1 on: February 04, 2013, 09:12:46 AM »
Quote
Richard Dawwwkins!”, came the cry of a student as the six speakers entered the chamber last night. The eager greeting was emblematic of the excitement which surrounded the Cambridge Union’s debate last night. The prospect of a clash between celebrated thinkers Richard Dawkins and new Master of Magdalene Rowan Williams on the motion ‘this house believes religion has no place in the 21st century’ culminated in this term’s most popular debate.

A thousand students were watching, the Union’s President-elect told the crowd, many unable to get a place in the chamber but following the debate in rooms around the building. Hundreds more had been turned away, with lines stretching into the streets since late afternoon.
....
"I have to declare something of an interest here”, Williams began, alluding to his long career in the Church of England, before setting forth his argument for religion’s continuing role in the 21st century. “Religion has always been a matter of community building,” he said, “a matter of building precisely those relations of compassion, fellow feeling and, I dare to use the word, inclusion, which would otherwise be absent from our societies."

A youtube video of the debate (which I think is not the official video of the debate) is here.

Thanks for posting this.  :)
"This is the cross - to become dead to the whole world, to suffer sorrows, temptations and other passions of Christ; in bearing this cross with complete patience, we imitate Christ's passion and thus glorify our God the Father as His sons in grace and co-heirs of Christ." --St. Symeon the New Theologian

Offline pmpn8rGPT

  • Grammar Nazi in three languages.
  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,038
  • Proof that Russia won the Space Race.
Re: Dawkins v Williams: the Union debate (Feb. 2013)
« Reply #2 on: February 04, 2013, 10:17:54 AM »
Quote
Richard Dawwwkins!”, came the cry of a student as the six speakers entered the chamber last night. The eager greeting was emblematic of the excitement which surrounded the Cambridge Union’s debate last night. The prospect of a clash between celebrated thinkers Richard Dawkins and new Master of Magdalene Rowan Williams on the motion ‘this house believes religion has no place in the 21st century’ culminated in this term’s most popular debate.

A thousand students were watching, the Union’s President-elect told the crowd, many unable to get a place in the chamber but following the debate in rooms around the building. Hundreds more had been turned away, with lines stretching into the streets since late afternoon.
....
"I have to declare something of an interest here”, Williams began, alluding to his long career in the Church of England, before setting forth his argument for religion’s continuing role in the 21st century. “Religion has always been a matter of community building,” he said, “a matter of building precisely those relations of compassion, fellow feeling and, I dare to use the word, inclusion, which would otherwise be absent from our societies."

A youtube video of the debate (which I think is not the official video of the debate) is here.
Didn't Rowan found the Arian Church of England?
"Tomorrow, I shall no longer be here."
-Nostradamus's last words.

Offline jmbejdl

  • Count-Palatine James the Spurious of Giggleswick on the Naze
  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,480
  • Great Martyr St. John the New of Suceava
Re: Dawkins v Williams: the Union debate (Feb. 2013)
« Reply #3 on: February 04, 2013, 11:41:01 AM »
Quote
Richard Dawwwkins!”, came the cry of a student as the six speakers entered the chamber last night. The eager greeting was emblematic of the excitement which surrounded the Cambridge Union’s debate last night. The prospect of a clash between celebrated thinkers Richard Dawkins and new Master of Magdalene Rowan Williams on the motion ‘this house believes religion has no place in the 21st century’ culminated in this term’s most popular debate.

A thousand students were watching, the Union’s President-elect told the crowd, many unable to get a place in the chamber but following the debate in rooms around the building. Hundreds more had been turned away, with lines stretching into the streets since late afternoon.
....
"I have to declare something of an interest here”, Williams began, alluding to his long career in the Church of England, before setting forth his argument for religion’s continuing role in the 21st century. “Religion has always been a matter of community building,” he said, “a matter of building precisely those relations of compassion, fellow feeling and, I dare to use the word, inclusion, which would otherwise be absent from our societies."

A youtube video of the debate (which I think is not the official video of the debate) is here.
Didn't Rowan found the Arian Church of England?

No, he's the last Archbishop of Canterbury.
We owe greater gratitude to those who humble us, wrong us, and douse us with venom, than to those who nurse us with honour and sweet words, or feed us with tasty food and confections, for bile is the best medicine for our soul. - Elder Paisios of Mount Athos

Offline NightOwl

  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 596
Re: Dawkins v Williams: the Union debate (Feb. 2013)
« Reply #4 on: February 04, 2013, 03:13:54 PM »
« Last Edit: February 04, 2013, 03:15:07 PM by NightOwl »

Offline pmpn8rGPT

  • Grammar Nazi in three languages.
  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,038
  • Proof that Russia won the Space Race.
Re: Dawkins v Williams: the Union debate (Feb. 2013)
« Reply #5 on: February 04, 2013, 06:28:24 PM »
Quote
Richard Dawwwkins!”, came the cry of a student as the six speakers entered the chamber last night. The eager greeting was emblematic of the excitement which surrounded the Cambridge Union’s debate last night. The prospect of a clash between celebrated thinkers Richard Dawkins and new Master of Magdalene Rowan Williams on the motion ‘this house believes religion has no place in the 21st century’ culminated in this term’s most popular debate.

A thousand students were watching, the Union’s President-elect told the crowd, many unable to get a place in the chamber but following the debate in rooms around the building. Hundreds more had been turned away, with lines stretching into the streets since late afternoon.
....
"I have to declare something of an interest here”, Williams began, alluding to his long career in the Church of England, before setting forth his argument for religion’s continuing role in the 21st century. “Religion has always been a matter of community building,” he said, “a matter of building precisely those relations of compassion, fellow feeling and, I dare to use the word, inclusion, which would otherwise be absent from our societies."

A youtube video of the debate (which I think is not the official video of the debate) is here.
Didn't Rowan found the Arian Church of England?

No, he's the last Archbishop of Canterbury.
My bad, I was thinking about his book on Arius and somehow got him mixed up...
« Last Edit: February 04, 2013, 06:28:50 PM by pmpn8rGPT »
"Tomorrow, I shall no longer be here."
-Nostradamus's last words.

Offline Alveus Lacuna

  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 7,061
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: OCA
Re: Dawkins v Williams: the Union debate (Feb. 2013)
« Reply #6 on: February 04, 2013, 07:59:52 PM »
Putting all religions on ontologically equal footing and fighting for all of them seems ridiculous to me. It should be more a question of Truth than pragmaticism and functionality of institutional organizations. IT seems like a dumb topic to begin with. For example, who would agree that atheism has NO place to play in society in the 21st century? Everything has its place, and to speak so categorically from the outset seem juvenile.

Offline Shiny

  • Site Supporter
  • Toumarches
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,267
  • Paint It Red
Re: Dawkins v Williams: the Union debate (Feb. 2013)
« Reply #7 on: February 04, 2013, 08:27:21 PM »
Putting all religions on ontologically equal footing and fighting for all of them seems ridiculous to me. It should be more a question of Truth than pragmaticism and functionality of institutional organizations. IT seems like a dumb topic to begin with. For example, who would agree that atheism has NO place to play in society in the 21st century? Everything has its place, and to speak so categorically from the outset seem juvenile.
Don't be fooled by internet atheism into believing there are more atheists out there, because the truth is they represent such a miniority. The only place they can portend to have any clout whatsoever is on the internet. There influence, let alone action, in society is really marginalized.
“There is your brother, naked, crying, and you stand there confused over the choice of an attractive floor covering.”

– St. Ambrose of Milan

Offline Balthasar

  • Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 343
Re: Dawkins v Williams: the Union debate (Feb. 2013)
« Reply #8 on: February 05, 2013, 12:13:56 PM »

British monkey-elites who contributed immensely to the destruction of Christianity in the UK. They did it in just one generation. How I'm tired of watching their primitiv and unpleasant sense of arrogance and superiority.  :o

Offline Alveus Lacuna

  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 7,061
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: OCA
Re: Dawkins v Williams: the Union debate (Feb. 2013)
« Reply #9 on: February 05, 2013, 11:58:25 PM »
British monkey-elites who contributed immensely to the destruction of Christianity in the UK. They did it in just one generation. How I'm tired of watching their primitive and unpleasant sense of arrogance and superiority.  :o

I suppose they would agree that they are indeed primates! *rimshot*

Online NicholasMyra

  • Avowed denominationalist
  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 6,520
  • Nepsis or Sepsis™
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Antiochian+Greek
Re: Dawkins v Williams: the Union debate (Feb. 2013)
« Reply #10 on: February 06, 2013, 12:11:49 AM »
How I'm tired of watching their primitiv and unpleasant sense of arrogance and superiority.  :o

So, let's ban Islam in Christian, Jewish, Hindu, Budha countries, let's expel those ungrateful Muslims from those countries.
Πάντα μὲν καθαρὰ τοῖς καθαροῖς
Τοῖς δὲ μεμιασμένοις καὶ ἀπίστοις οὐδὲν καθαρόν

http://hyperdoxherman.tumblr.com/