OrthodoxChristianity.net
April 23, 2014, 02:55:05 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: The Rules page has been updated.  Please familiarize yourself with its contents!
 
   Home   Help Calendar Contact Treasury Tags Login Register  
Pages: 1   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Constantinople Papism  (Read 247 times) Average Rating: 0
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Gunnarr
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,511



« on: February 01, 2013, 06:16:23 PM »

I don't know if this is in the correct place in the forums, but i imagine it might provoke outrage so i put it here.

I went to the wikipedia page of the Council of Chalcedon and noticed a new addition stating that canon 28 was of disputed validity. I went to the new source for that, putting me here:

(American Orthodox Institute website, i dont know what it is)

http://www.aoiusa.org/canon-28-and-eastern-papalism-cause-or-effect/

I read the very long article and I found it very interesting as I have not heard arguments such as this before.


Anyway, if anyone is bored and has already done their prayers for the day , go ahead and read it and comment what you think of it.


I do not have much to say about it really, because I do not know if I can trust the claims. but it seems to have been written by a learned mind. so yeah what do you crazy people here think of it?
Logged

I am a demonic servant! Beware!
Cyrillic
Taxiarches
**********
Online Online

Faith: Christian
Jurisdiction: Moscow
Posts: 7,963


The Reactionary Rebel


WWW
« Reply #1 on: February 01, 2013, 06:34:25 PM »

Canon 28 isn't disputed in the article but the Phanar's interpretation of it is.
Logged

Odi profanum vulgus et arceo

"J'ai pour les institutions démocratiques un goût de tête, mais je suis aristocrate par instinct"
-A. de Tocqueville

'Don't bother arguing with Cyrillic, he is Dutch or something queer like that.'
-Byron
Aindriú
Faster! Funnier!
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Cynical
Jurisdiction: Vestibule of Hell
Posts: 3,908



WWW
« Reply #2 on: February 01, 2013, 08:20:25 PM »

Canon 28 isn't disputed in the article but the Phanar's interpretation of it is.

That's not what I read.
Logged


I'm going to need this.
Tags:
Pages: 1   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.044 seconds with 30 queries.