Author Topic: Constantinople Papism  (Read 399 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Gunnarr

  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,942
Constantinople Papism
« on: February 01, 2013, 06:16:23 PM »
I don't know if this is in the correct place in the forums, but i imagine it might provoke outrage so i put it here.

I went to the wikipedia page of the Council of Chalcedon and noticed a new addition stating that canon 28 was of disputed validity. I went to the new source for that, putting me here:

(American Orthodox Institute website, i dont know what it is)

http://www.aoiusa.org/canon-28-and-eastern-papalism-cause-or-effect/

I read the very long article and I found it very interesting as I have not heard arguments such as this before.


Anyway, if anyone is bored and has already done their prayers for the day , go ahead and read it and comment what you think of it.


I do not have much to say about it really, because I do not know if I can trust the claims. but it seems to have been written by a learned mind. so yeah what do you crazy people here think of it?
I am a demonic servant! Beware!

Offline Cyrillic

  • The Laughing Cavalier
  • Toumarches
  • ************
  • Posts: 12,219
  • Level 13 Chalcedonian Paladin
  • Jurisdiction: But my heart belongs to Finland
Re: Constantinople Papism
« Reply #1 on: February 01, 2013, 06:34:25 PM »
Canon 28 isn't disputed in the article but the Phanar's interpretation of it is.
At nunc desertis cessant sacraria lucis:
aurum omnes victa iam pietate colunt.
-Propertius, Elegies III.XIII:47-48

Ἀπ' ὃσα ἒκαμα κι ἀπ’ ὃσα εἶπα
νὰ μὴ ζητήσουνε νὰ βροῦν ποιός ἢμουν
-C.P Cavafy

Offline Aindriú

  • Faster! Funnier!
  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 3,918
    • Blog
Re: Constantinople Papism
« Reply #2 on: February 01, 2013, 08:20:25 PM »
Canon 28 isn't disputed in the article but the Phanar's interpretation of it is.

That's not what I read.

I'm going to need this.