Author Topic: Constantinople Papism  (Read 347 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Gunnarr

  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,912
Constantinople Papism
« on: February 01, 2013, 06:16:23 PM »
I don't know if this is in the correct place in the forums, but i imagine it might provoke outrage so i put it here.

I went to the wikipedia page of the Council of Chalcedon and noticed a new addition stating that canon 28 was of disputed validity. I went to the new source for that, putting me here:

(American Orthodox Institute website, i dont know what it is)

http://www.aoiusa.org/canon-28-and-eastern-papalism-cause-or-effect/

I read the very long article and I found it very interesting as I have not heard arguments such as this before.


Anyway, if anyone is bored and has already done their prayers for the day , go ahead and read it and comment what you think of it.


I do not have much to say about it really, because I do not know if I can trust the claims. but it seems to have been written by a learned mind. so yeah what do you crazy people here think of it?
I am a demonic servant! Beware!

Offline Cyrillic

  • Arbiter Elegantiarum
  • Merarches
  • ***********
  • Posts: 10,662
  • Cyrillico est imperare orbi universo
Re: Constantinople Papism
« Reply #1 on: February 01, 2013, 06:34:25 PM »
Canon 28 isn't disputed in the article but the Phanar's interpretation of it is.
"Who wants to be consistent? The dullard and the doctrinaire, the tedious people who carry out their principles to the bitter end of action, to the reductio ad absurdum of practice. Not I."
-Oscar Wilde, The Decay of Lying

Offline Aindriú

  • Faster! Funnier!
  • Protokentarchos
  • *********
  • Posts: 3,918
    • Blog
Re: Constantinople Papism
« Reply #2 on: February 01, 2013, 08:20:25 PM »
Canon 28 isn't disputed in the article but the Phanar's interpretation of it is.

That's not what I read.

I'm going to need this.