Author Topic: Old vs. New Calendar?  (Read 503140 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline ilyazhito

  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 987
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2880 on: November 23, 2015, 11:49:10 AM »
That's true, and it seems like the New Calendar and the Gregorian calendar reinvented the wheel. It is unnecessary, IMHO, but I don't know what to do now.Russia, Serbia, Jerusalem, Mount Athos, Poland, and Georgia at least use the Old Calendar, and a number of churches that are officially new calendar, such as Romania, Bulgaria, and Greece have uncanonical Old Calendar counterparts who might be regularized if all switch back to the Old Calendar. Thus, this would be ideal, but I don't know if there is enough impetus tor practically achieve this.

Offline Dominika

  • Troublesome Sheep
  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 2,286
  • Serbian/Polish
    • My youtube channel
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: POC, but my heart belongs to Antioch
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2881 on: November 23, 2015, 01:14:35 PM »
That's true, and it seems like the New Calendar and the Gregorian calendar reinvented the wheel. It is unnecessary, IMHO, but I don't know what to do now.Russia, Serbia, Jerusalem, Mount Athos, Poland, and Georgia at least use the Old Calendar, and a number of churches that are officially new calendar, such as Romania, Bulgaria, and Greece have uncanonical Old Calendar counterparts who might be regularized if all switch back to the Old Calendar. Thus, this would be ideal, but I don't know if there is enough impetus tor practically achieve this.

There are some Polish parishes (including one cathedra seat) still using the new calendar; and some of tchem celebrate Nativity (and sometimes also Epiphany) according to the both calendar or just new one (despite celebrating all the rest according to the old calendar) - this strange practice appeared after the official switch to the old calendar 1 year ago.

The problem is that even in Polish the statement was unclear, and then translated into Russian and English probably leaded to misunderstanding the international opinion. Not talking about many abnormalities that took place after this change, and the way it was introduced
Pray for persecuted Christians, especially in Serbian Kosovo and Raška, Egypt and Syria

Offline mike

  • Filthy Chalcedonian Liar
  • Protostrator
  • ***************
  • Posts: 23,634
  • Pray for Christians in Radom!
  • Faith: Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Diocese of Białystok and Gdańsk
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2882 on: December 08, 2015, 05:34:40 AM »
Almost entire Łodź-Poznań diocese is new calendar, half of Lublin-Chełm diocese is NC as well, 1/4 of Białystok-Gdańsk diocese is NC as welll.
Pray for orthonorm (Jason)

Hyperdox Herman, Eastern Orthodox Christian News - fb, Eastern Orthodox Christian News - tt

not everything I typed before [insert current date] may reflect my current views on the subject

Offline Pravoslavac

  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 727
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Serbian Orthodox Church
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2883 on: December 08, 2015, 07:47:56 AM »
New calendar created schism in the Church, that is it's fruit.
"Bullets comrades! Not candies! Bullets will save us from the US imperialists!" - Comrade Kim Jong Il

Offline Mockingbird

  • Mimus polyglottos
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 231
  • Faith: Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Episcopal Church
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2884 on: December 26, 2015, 08:14:26 PM »
That's true, and it seems like the New Calendar and the Gregorian calendar reinvented the wheel.
The Gregorian calendar fixed a broken wheel.
Forþon we sealon efestan þas Easterlican þing to asmeagenne and to gehealdanne, þaet we magon cuman to þam Easterlican daege, þe aa byð, mid fullum glaedscipe and wynsumnysse and ecere blisse.--Byrhtferth of Ramsey

Offline ilyazhito

  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 987
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2885 on: January 01, 2016, 10:04:27 AM »
How exactly was that wheel broken? I know that the difference between Julian/Gregorian calendars is 13 days, but the Julian calendar is the one still used for astronomical calculations. RE the Old Calendar and Poland, I read the act of the Synod of Bishops of Poland that decreed that the Old Calendar would begin after the Sunday of All Saints, 2014. Thank you for Mike and Dominika for giving the info on the ground.

Offline Dominika

  • Troublesome Sheep
  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 2,286
  • Serbian/Polish
    • My youtube channel
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: POC, but my heart belongs to Antioch
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2886 on: January 01, 2016, 05:34:05 PM »
RE the Old Calendar and Poland, I read the act of the Synod of Bishops of Poland that decreed that the Old Calendar would begin after the Sunday of All Saints, 2014. Thank you for Mike and Dominika for giving the info on the ground.

As I said, even the statement written orignally in Polish was quite strange, so no talking about its translations. And, very often, behind a Church statement there is an important background, not presented in public
Pray for persecuted Christians, especially in Serbian Kosovo and Raška, Egypt and Syria

Offline PeterTheAleut

  • The Right Blowhard Peter the Furtive of Yetts O'Muckhart
  • Section Moderator
  • Hypatos
  • *****
  • Posts: 37,380
  • Lord, have mercy on the Christians in Mosul!
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Orthodox Church in America
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2887 on: January 02, 2016, 10:28:11 AM »
How exactly was that wheel broken? I know that the difference between Julian/Gregorian calendars is 13 days, but the Julian calendar is the one still used for astronomical calculations.
Don't conflate the Julian Day Count used for astronomical calculations with the Julian Calendar. They're two totally different entities. In fact, the Julian Day Count and the Julian Calendar are even named after different persons.
Not all who wander are lost.

Offline mike

  • Filthy Chalcedonian Liar
  • Protostrator
  • ***************
  • Posts: 23,634
  • Pray for Christians in Radom!
  • Faith: Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Diocese of Białystok and Gdańsk
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2888 on: January 02, 2016, 03:38:41 PM »
RE the Old Calendar and Poland, I read the act of the Synod of Bishops of Poland that decreed that the Old Calendar would begin after the Sunday of All Saints, 2014. Thank you for Mike and Dominika for giving the info on the ground.

As I said, even the statement written orignally in Polish was quite strange, so no talking about its translations. And, very often, behind a Church statement there is an important background, not presented in public

It ended up that decision changed the situation in like 5 parishes only, out of 230.
Pray for orthonorm (Jason)

Hyperdox Herman, Eastern Orthodox Christian News - fb, Eastern Orthodox Christian News - tt

not everything I typed before [insert current date] may reflect my current views on the subject

Offline Dominika

  • Troublesome Sheep
  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 2,286
  • Serbian/Polish
    • My youtube channel
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: POC, but my heart belongs to Antioch
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2889 on: January 02, 2016, 05:43:42 PM »
RE the Old Calendar and Poland, I read the act of the Synod of Bishops of Poland that decreed that the Old Calendar would begin after the Sunday of All Saints, 2014. Thank you for Mike and Dominika for giving the info on the ground.

As I said, even the statement written orignally in Polish was quite strange, so no talking about its translations. And, very often, behind a Church statement there is an important background, not presented in public

It ended up that decision changed the situation in like 5 parishes only, out of 230.

Yeah, I think 4 exactly (metropolitan cathedra in Warsaw, Wołomin, Bydgoszcz and unfortunately mine in Warsaw too; I don't count the new parish in Warsaw's Ursynów as it didn't exist when the statement was announced).
Pray for persecuted Christians, especially in Serbian Kosovo and Raška, Egypt and Syria

Offline Mockingbird

  • Mimus polyglottos
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 231
  • Faith: Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Episcopal Church
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2890 on: January 03, 2016, 06:05:56 PM »
How exactly was that wheel broken? I know that the difference between Julian/Gregorian calendars is 13 days, but the Julian calendar is the one still used for astronomical calculations.


I have done astronomical computations.  For computations in molecular astrophysics I needed no calendar at all.  But yes, there are some long-distance calendrical calculations in which it is convenient to use the Julian year.  An alternative would be to use the 365-day old-Egyptian year as Claudius Ptolemy did.  This has nothing to do with the question of which calendar better approximates the motions of the luminaries.
Forþon we sealon efestan þas Easterlican þing to asmeagenne and to gehealdanne, þaet we magon cuman to þam Easterlican daege, þe aa byð, mid fullum glaedscipe and wynsumnysse and ecere blisse.--Byrhtferth of Ramsey

Offline Father H

  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 2,668
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Nea Roma
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2891 on: January 11, 2016, 11:41:59 PM »
Hey Mockingbird, how about 2016 where RC/Protestant Easter falls nearly a month before Passover?  Clearly for most of Church history the concern has been that it falls AFTER the first day of Passover, since Christ rose AFTER 14 Nisan (eve of Passover).  In fact, in the correspondences regarding disputes on the matter, it was to be delayed by a week when in doubt. 

Offline Mockingbird

  • Mimus polyglottos
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 231
  • Faith: Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Episcopal Church
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2892 on: January 14, 2016, 10:00:32 PM »
Passover 2016 in the Gregorian calendar is on March 23, 2016.  This date follows the definition of the fathers, who held that Passover was the first full moon after the Spring equinox.

By this definition, the Rabbinic Jewish (April 22, 2016) and Julian (April 26, 2016) computations are simply wrong.  The Jewish computation at least is near a full moon, but from the Gregorian calendar's point of view it is the wrong full moon.  The Julian computation is not even very close to the full moon.
Forþon we sealon efestan þas Easterlican þing to asmeagenne and to gehealdanne, þaet we magon cuman to þam Easterlican daege, þe aa byð, mid fullum glaedscipe and wynsumnysse and ecere blisse.--Byrhtferth of Ramsey

Offline PeterTheAleut

  • The Right Blowhard Peter the Furtive of Yetts O'Muckhart
  • Section Moderator
  • Hypatos
  • *****
  • Posts: 37,380
  • Lord, have mercy on the Christians in Mosul!
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Orthodox Church in America
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2893 on: January 15, 2016, 02:58:20 PM »
Hey Mockingbird, how about 2016 where RC/Protestant Easter falls nearly a month before Passover?  Clearly for most of Church history the concern has been that it falls AFTER the first day of Passover, since Christ rose AFTER 14 Nisan (eve of Passover).  In fact, in the correspondences regarding disputes on the matter, it was to be delayed by a week when in doubt.
If you read back far enough on this thread, I think you'll find a post I submitted on how the understanding that we must celebrate Pascha only after the Jews celebrate their Passover is a misunderstanding introduced by one of our canonists. The key is that our date for Pascha shall be calculated with no regard whatsoever for when the Jews celebrate Passover. To mandate that the Jewish Passover must always come before our Pascha is to once again tie our Pascha to the Jewish Passover.
Not all who wander are lost.

Offline Minnesotan

  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 3,101
  • From the Land of 10,000 Lakes
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2894 on: January 15, 2016, 03:06:28 PM »
I thought the full (fool) moon was on the 25th.

Based on threads lately we are having another one

Maybe it's an Old Calendar New Moon...    ;)

Come to think of it, the whole calendar issue is the Earth's fault for not adhering strictly to a strict 1461:4 spin-orbit resonance like a good pious planet should!

Maybe the whole thing could be resolved by using mass drivers to blast the Earth back into a more appropriate orbit. Although that might have unintended consequences....
I'm not going to be posting as much on OC.Net as before. I might stop in once in a while though. But I've come to realize that real life is more important.

Offline Mockingbird

  • Mimus polyglottos
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 231
  • Faith: Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Episcopal Church
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2895 on: January 23, 2016, 04:43:38 PM »
In fact, in the correspondences regarding disputes on the matter, it was to be delayed by a week when in doubt.
Are you referring to the occasion in 346 when Athanasius proclaimed Easter for March 30 when his own tables put it on March 23?  In this case, Athanasius accepted the later date in order to reach agreement with his brother bishops.  But in 333 and apparently in 349, Athanasius accepted an earlier date to reach agreement. 

In any case, the Alexandrian lunar tables at that time were reasonably accurate.  What people did in the days of good tables is no precedent for using bad tables.
Forþon we sealon efestan þas Easterlican þing to asmeagenne and to gehealdanne, þaet we magon cuman to þam Easterlican daege, þe aa byð, mid fullum glaedscipe and wynsumnysse and ecere blisse.--Byrhtferth of Ramsey

Offline ilyazhito

  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 987
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2896 on: January 27, 2016, 10:24:45 PM »
So is that where the stipulation that Pascha must come after Pesach (Jewish Passover) came from?

Offline PeterTheAleut

  • The Right Blowhard Peter the Furtive of Yetts O'Muckhart
  • Section Moderator
  • Hypatos
  • *****
  • Posts: 37,380
  • Lord, have mercy on the Christians in Mosul!
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Orthodox Church in America
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2897 on: January 27, 2016, 11:05:55 PM »
So is that where the stipulation that Pascha must come after Pesach (Jewish Passover) came from?
More so a misunderstanding that dates back to Zonaras the canonist.
Not all who wander are lost.

Offline JoeS2

  • OC.net guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,600
  • St. Mark Defender of the true Faith (old CAF guy)
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2898 on: January 27, 2016, 11:50:53 PM »
So is that where the stipulation that Pascha must come after Pesach (Jewish Passover) came from?

It would just seem logical.....I mean, how could we celebrate The Risen Christ Before the Passover even happened.? 
Im surprised that the Western Churches havent caught on by now.

Offline Mockingbird

  • Mimus polyglottos
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 231
  • Faith: Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Episcopal Church
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2899 on: January 28, 2016, 09:12:10 PM »
Hey Mockingbird, how about 2016 where RC/Protestant Easter falls nearly a month before Passover?  Clearly for most of Church history the concern has been that it falls AFTER the first day of Passover, since Christ rose AFTER 14 Nisan (eve of Passover).  In fact, in the correspondences regarding disputes on the matter, it was to be delayed by a week when in doubt.
If you read back far enough on this thread, I think you'll find a post I submitted on how the understanding that we must celebrate Pascha only after the Jews celebrate their Passover is a misunderstanding introduced by one of our canonists. The key is that our date for Pascha shall be calculated with no regard whatsoever for when the Jews celebrate Passover. To mandate that the Jewish Passover must always come before our Pascha is to once again tie our Pascha to the Jewish Passover.

One of PtA's posts in the subject is found at
http://www.orthodoxchristianity.net/forum/index.php/topic,2233.msg1068235.html#msg1068235

Zonaras's interpretation of Apostolic canon #7, which shows on its face how clueless Zonaras was about the correct interpretation of this canon, can be found at
http://www.orthodoxchristianity.net/forum/index.php/topic,2233.msg1071066.html#msg1071066
Forþon we sealon efestan þas Easterlican þing to asmeagenne and to gehealdanne, þaet we magon cuman to þam Easterlican daege, þe aa byð, mid fullum glaedscipe and wynsumnysse and ecere blisse.--Byrhtferth of Ramsey

Offline Mockingbird

  • Mimus polyglottos
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 231
  • Faith: Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Episcopal Church
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2900 on: January 28, 2016, 09:16:35 PM »
So is that where the stipulation that Pascha must come after Pesach (Jewish Passover) came from?

It would just seem logical.....I mean, how could we celebrate The Risen Christ Before the Passover even happened.? 
Im surprised that the Western Churches havent caught on by now.
Our Jewish neighbors decide when Passover is for themselves.  Christians decide when Passover is for Christians.  The one need have nothing to do with the other, as the facts show:

This year,

the Gregorian Passover is Wednesday, March 23 2016;
the Samaritan Passover is Wednesday, April 20, 2016;
the Rabbinic Passover is Friday, April 22, 2016;
the Julian Passover is Tuesday, April 26, 2016.
« Last Edit: January 28, 2016, 09:17:09 PM by Mockingbird »
Forþon we sealon efestan þas Easterlican þing to asmeagenne and to gehealdanne, þaet we magon cuman to þam Easterlican daege, þe aa byð, mid fullum glaedscipe and wynsumnysse and ecere blisse.--Byrhtferth of Ramsey

Offline Asteriktos

  • Hypatos
  • *****************
  • Posts: 33,587
  • Abba Hezekiah, Patron of Dialogists
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2901 on: February 27, 2016, 07:35:57 PM »
This was slightly off topic in the other thread, so I'm going to post it here.

The larger point, however, is that holding unity hostage over something as dumb as a severely inaccurate calendar is somehow acceptable across large swathes of Orthodoxy.

Does calendrical accuracy have some kind of significance I don't understand, such that the old calendar is vastly inferior to other inaccurate time-tracking methods we currently have available? Is this like a chemistry experiment where things need to meet a certain accuracy threshold before they are valid, though in this case for spiritual or religious matters? I think the calendar differences are a shame, but I don't really understand these kinds of arguments about them.

Offline Rohzek

  • Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 409
    • Shameless Orthodoxy
  • Faith: Orthodox and Postpositivist
  • Jurisdiction: Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2902 on: February 27, 2016, 08:05:56 PM »
This was slightly off topic in the other thread, so I'm going to post it here.

The larger point, however, is that holding unity hostage over something as dumb as a severely inaccurate calendar is somehow acceptable across large swathes of Orthodoxy.

Does calendrical accuracy have some kind of significance I don't understand, such that the old calendar is vastly inferior to other inaccurate time-tracking methods we currently have available? Is this like a chemistry experiment where things need to meet a certain accuracy threshold before they are valid, though in this case for spiritual or religious matters? I think the calendar differences are a shame, but I don't really understand these kinds of arguments about them.

Beyond astronomical accuracy? No. The whole reason why it even came up for discussion and the New Julian Calendar was developed in the early 20th century was solely about astronomical accuracy. That's it. It was the Old Calendarists who put forth the proposition that it was a matter of dogma that the Old Julian Calendar was somehow sanctioned by God.

Another point, which is highly dependent upon how one views ecumenism, is that it would be nicer to celebrate a number of holidays closer to our other Christian brethren. If you favor ecumenism, then this idea isn't ridiculous. If you don't, then this idea reveals some sort of shallow materialist and modernist mindset on my part.
"What I have shown you is reality. What you remember, that is the illusion." - Sephiroth from Final Fantasy VII

“Fools have a habit of believing that everything written by a famous author is admirable. For my part I read only to please myself and like only what suits my taste.” - Lord Pococurante in Candide by Voltaire

Check out my new blog: Shameless Orthodoxy Latest Post: Upon this Rock; An Addendum

Offline Mockingbird

  • Mimus polyglottos
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 231
  • Faith: Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Episcopal Church
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2903 on: March 05, 2016, 11:51:27 AM »
Does calendrical accuracy have some kind of significance I don't understand, such that the old calendar is vastly inferior to other inaccurate time-tracking methods we currently have available?
More accurate is, by definition, truer to the facts.   The moon should look reasonably full on the day your lunar tables say it is full.  The Julian tables do not pass this test.
Forþon we sealon efestan þas Easterlican þing to asmeagenne and to gehealdanne, þaet we magon cuman to þam Easterlican daege, þe aa byð, mid fullum glaedscipe and wynsumnysse and ecere blisse.--Byrhtferth of Ramsey

Online Mor Ephrem

  • Supreme Commander of the Joint Armed Warrior Services (JAWS) of the Oriental Orthodox Church
  • Section Moderator
  • Protostrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 27,709
  • Fr Seraphim Rose and the Twin Towers
    • OrthodoxChristianity.net
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: But my heart belongs to Czech Lands
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2904 on: March 05, 2016, 12:03:12 PM »
The moon should look reasonably full on the day your lunar tables say it is full.  The Julian tables do not pass this test.


You'd be better off omitting "reasonably". 
Mor has an open appeal. This we knew already.

Mor suffers from Invincible Ignorance and is guaranteed salvation according to the Roman Catholic Church.

Offline Mockingbird

  • Mimus polyglottos
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 231
  • Faith: Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Episcopal Church
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2905 on: March 05, 2016, 12:14:54 PM »
The moon should look reasonably full on the day your lunar tables say it is full.  The Julian tables do not pass this test.


You'd be better off omitting "reasonably".
Unnecessary.  The gibbous moon in the picture does not look "reasonably" full.
Forþon we sealon efestan þas Easterlican þing to asmeagenne and to gehealdanne, þaet we magon cuman to þam Easterlican daege, þe aa byð, mid fullum glaedscipe and wynsumnysse and ecere blisse.--Byrhtferth of Ramsey

Online Mor Ephrem

  • Supreme Commander of the Joint Armed Warrior Services (JAWS) of the Oriental Orthodox Church
  • Section Moderator
  • Protostrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 27,709
  • Fr Seraphim Rose and the Twin Towers
    • OrthodoxChristianity.net
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: But my heart belongs to Czech Lands
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2906 on: March 05, 2016, 01:46:27 PM »
The moon should look reasonably full on the day your lunar tables say it is full.  The Julian tables do not pass this test.


You'd be better off omitting "reasonably".
Unnecessary.  The gibbous moon in the picture does not look "reasonably" full.

According to you.  My point is that you're giving people wiggle room that you don't intend to give them.
Mor has an open appeal. This we knew already.

Mor suffers from Invincible Ignorance and is guaranteed salvation according to the Roman Catholic Church.

Offline Regnare

  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 521
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: OCA
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2907 on: March 07, 2016, 07:25:24 PM »
Does calendrical accuracy have some kind of significance I don't understand, such that the old calendar is vastly inferior to other inaccurate time-tracking methods we currently have available?
More accurate is, by definition, truer to the facts.   The moon should look reasonably full on the day your lunar tables say it is full.  The Julian tables do not pass this test.


If it's important for the moon to be really full on the day the tables say it's full, isn't it also important for the moon to be the first full moon after the vernal equinox if your lunar tables say it is? For all the Christians of the Southern Hemisphere, that's the first full moon after the fall equinox, and therefore inaccurate by a full six months.
"Whosoever you are who introduce new doctrines, I beseech you to spare the ears of Romans! Spare that faith which was commended by the voice of an Apostle. Why should you attempt to teach us, at the end of hundreds of years, that which we never heard before? Why bring forward what Peter and Paul did not will to make known? Until this day, the world was Christian without your doctrine. Thus, I hold as an old man onto that faith wherein I was regenerated as a boy." St. Jerome

Offline Carl Kraeff (Second Chance)

  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 7,842
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Diocese of the South (OCA)
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2908 on: March 07, 2016, 07:48:46 PM »
Does calendrical accuracy have some kind of significance I don't understand, such that the old calendar is vastly inferior to other inaccurate time-tracking methods we currently have available?
More accurate is, by definition, truer to the facts.   The moon should look reasonably full on the day your lunar tables say it is full.  The Julian tables do not pass this test.


If it's important for the moon to be really full on the day the tables say it's full, isn't it also important for the moon to be the first full moon after the Northern Hemisphere vernal equinox if your lunar tables say it is? For all the Christians of the Southern Hemisphere, that's the first full moon after the fall equinox, and therefore inaccurate by a full six months.

Fixed it for you.

Offline Regnare

  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 521
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: OCA
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2909 on: March 08, 2016, 01:25:51 AM »
That's a good point; the season itself isn't really a big deal.
Another thing that occurs to me, though, is that it may not be the equinox, given that the church's "spring equinox" is perpetually set at Julian Calendar March 21. The Western churches use Gregorian Calendar March 21 in the same way. If I may quote Wikipedia:
Quote
When Julius Caesar established the Julian calendar in 45 BC, he set 25 March as the date of the spring equinox. Because the Julian year (365.25 days) is slightly longer than the tropical year, the calendar "drifted" with respect to the two equinoxes — such that in 300 AD the spring equinox occurred about 21 March. By 1500 AD, it had drifted backwards to 11 March.

This drift induced Pope Gregory XIII to create a modern Gregorian calendar. The Pope wanted to continue to conform with the edicts concerning the date of Easter of the Council of Nicaea of AD 325, which means he wanted to move the vernal equinox to 21 March, which is the day allocated to it in the Easter table of the Julian calendar. However, the leap year intervals in his calendar were not smooth (400 is not an exact multiple of 97). This causes the equinox to oscillate by about 53 hours around its mean position. This in turn raised the possibility that it could fall on 22 March, and thus Easter Day might theoretically commence before the equinox. The astronomers chose the appropriate number of days to omit so that the equinox would swing from 19 to 21 March but never fall on the 22nd (although it can in a handful of years fall early in the morning of that day in the Far East).

In general, I think any attempt to get Easter absolutely astronomically accurate ends up having to bow to ecclesiastical convenience.
"Whosoever you are who introduce new doctrines, I beseech you to spare the ears of Romans! Spare that faith which was commended by the voice of an Apostle. Why should you attempt to teach us, at the end of hundreds of years, that which we never heard before? Why bring forward what Peter and Paul did not will to make known? Until this day, the world was Christian without your doctrine. Thus, I hold as an old man onto that faith wherein I was regenerated as a boy." St. Jerome

Offline FinnJames

  • Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 379
  • Faith: Eastern Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Orthodox Church of Finland
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2910 on: March 08, 2016, 01:50:24 AM »
Call me naïve, I've never understood how when we celebrate Easter became more important than that we celebrate Easter.

Offline Dominika

  • Troublesome Sheep
  • Archon
  • ********
  • Posts: 2,286
  • Serbian/Polish
    • My youtube channel
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: POC, but my heart belongs to Antioch
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2911 on: March 08, 2016, 07:08:10 AM »
Call me naïve, I've never understood how when we celebrate Easter became more important than that we celebrate Easter.
It's not more important, but it IS important.


I think it comes from a few things:
1. The importance of Pascha's date is shown in the Old Testament, it's given by God.
As the New Israel, we're supposed to continu the OT, but in a bit different way - so that's wy we have to celebrate Pascha after the Jews; plus that's derivated from Gospel (the beginning of the most salvatious things started indeed, on Jewish Pascha, but Christ's Resurrection happned not on the first day of Jewish Pascha)

2. That's one of very few thngs from Christ's life, that we know exactly when it happened.

3. Over the centuries local Churches had (and, actually, have) different for various feasts, but one thing they were celebrating together: that's Holy Week and Pascha (even there have been difference in the dates of th Great Lent's beginning). And it's written in the statements of Antioch council in 341.
Pray for persecuted Christians, especially in Serbian Kosovo and Raška, Egypt and Syria

Online Mor Ephrem

  • Supreme Commander of the Joint Armed Warrior Services (JAWS) of the Oriental Orthodox Church
  • Section Moderator
  • Protostrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 27,709
  • Fr Seraphim Rose and the Twin Towers
    • OrthodoxChristianity.net
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: But my heart belongs to Czech Lands
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2912 on: March 08, 2016, 10:50:33 AM »
That's a good point; the season itself isn't really a big deal.

What season are you talking about?
Mor has an open appeal. This we knew already.

Mor suffers from Invincible Ignorance and is guaranteed salvation according to the Roman Catholic Church.

Offline Regnare

  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 521
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: OCA
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2913 on: March 08, 2016, 11:04:52 AM »
That's a good point; the season itself isn't really a big deal.

What season are you talking about?
Carl seems to be making the point that although the seasons are reversed in the Southern Hemisphere, it's more important that Easter falls at the time of year that represented spring to the Fathers of Nicea than that it fall at the actual season of spring in each part of the world.
"Whosoever you are who introduce new doctrines, I beseech you to spare the ears of Romans! Spare that faith which was commended by the voice of an Apostle. Why should you attempt to teach us, at the end of hundreds of years, that which we never heard before? Why bring forward what Peter and Paul did not will to make known? Until this day, the world was Christian without your doctrine. Thus, I hold as an old man onto that faith wherein I was regenerated as a boy." St. Jerome

Offline PeterTheAleut

  • The Right Blowhard Peter the Furtive of Yetts O'Muckhart
  • Section Moderator
  • Hypatos
  • *****
  • Posts: 37,380
  • Lord, have mercy on the Christians in Mosul!
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Orthodox Church in America
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2914 on: March 08, 2016, 12:12:57 PM »
1. The importance of Pascha's date is shown in the Old Testament, it's given by God.
As the New Israel, we're supposed to continu the OT, but in a bit different way - so that's wy we have to celebrate Pascha after the Jews; plus that's derivated from Gospel (the beginning of the most salvatious things started indeed, on Jewish Pascha, but Christ's Resurrection happned not on the first day of Jewish Pascha)
The one sure way to perpetuate an error by one of our canonists is to theologize that error.
Not all who wander are lost.

Online Mor Ephrem

  • Supreme Commander of the Joint Armed Warrior Services (JAWS) of the Oriental Orthodox Church
  • Section Moderator
  • Protostrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 27,709
  • Fr Seraphim Rose and the Twin Towers
    • OrthodoxChristianity.net
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: But my heart belongs to Czech Lands
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2915 on: March 08, 2016, 02:30:05 PM »
That's a good point; the season itself isn't really a big deal.

What season are you talking about?
Carl seems to be making the point that although the seasons are reversed in the Southern Hemisphere, it's more important that Easter falls at the time of year that represented spring to the Fathers of Nicea than that it fall at the actual season of spring in each part of the world.

Ah.  Perhaps I'm more radical than Carl.
Mor has an open appeal. This we knew already.

Mor suffers from Invincible Ignorance and is guaranteed salvation according to the Roman Catholic Church.

Offline RaphaCam

  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 854
  • Sublime Augustine, wise writer of the City of God
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Church of Poland - Archeparchy of Brazil
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2916 on: March 08, 2016, 10:22:24 PM »
1. The importance of Pascha's date is shown in the Old Testament, it's given by God.
As the New Israel, we're supposed to continu the OT, but in a bit different way - so that's wy we have to celebrate Pascha after the Jews; plus that's derivated from Gospel (the beginning of the most salvatious things started indeed, on Jewish Pascha, but Christ's Resurrection happned not on the first day of Jewish Pascha)
The one sure way to perpetuate an error by one of our canonists is to theologize that error.

What do you mean by that?
Rise up, Lord, and let thine enemies be scattered; and let them that hate thee flee before thee. Return, o Lord, unto the many thousands of Israel.

Offline PeterTheAleut

  • The Right Blowhard Peter the Furtive of Yetts O'Muckhart
  • Section Moderator
  • Hypatos
  • *****
  • Posts: 37,380
  • Lord, have mercy on the Christians in Mosul!
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Orthodox Church in America
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2917 on: March 09, 2016, 01:51:34 AM »
1. The importance of Pascha's date is shown in the Old Testament, it's given by God.
As the New Israel, we're supposed to continu the OT, but in a bit different way - so that's wy we have to celebrate Pascha after the Jews; plus that's derivated from Gospel (the beginning of the most salvatious things started indeed, on Jewish Pascha, but Christ's Resurrection happned not on the first day of Jewish Pascha)
The one sure way to perpetuate an error by one of our canonists is to theologize that error.

What do you mean by that?
The commonly held belief that Orthodox Pascha must always follow the Jewish Passover is an error that started with St. Nicodemos of the Holy Mountain. What we just saw Dominika do is give a theological reason for that error.
Not all who wander are lost.

Offline RaphaCam

  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 854
  • Sublime Augustine, wise writer of the City of God
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Church of Poland - Archeparchy of Brazil
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2918 on: March 12, 2016, 12:05:11 PM »
I see.

What do you guys think of this article?
Rise up, Lord, and let thine enemies be scattered; and let them that hate thee flee before thee. Return, o Lord, unto the many thousands of Israel.

Online Mor Ephrem

  • Supreme Commander of the Joint Armed Warrior Services (JAWS) of the Oriental Orthodox Church
  • Section Moderator
  • Protostrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 27,709
  • Fr Seraphim Rose and the Twin Towers
    • OrthodoxChristianity.net
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: But my heart belongs to Czech Lands
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2919 on: March 12, 2016, 01:46:49 PM »
I see.

What do you guys think of this article?

It's not as black and white as Sanidopoulos would have you think.  All one needs to do is read more of Elder Ephraim's writings to see that.
Mor has an open appeal. This we knew already.

Mor suffers from Invincible Ignorance and is guaranteed salvation according to the Roman Catholic Church.

Offline Mockingbird

  • Mimus polyglottos
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 231
  • Faith: Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Episcopal Church
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2920 on: April 02, 2016, 05:57:08 PM »
Does calendrical accuracy have some kind of significance I don't understand, such that the old calendar is vastly inferior to other inaccurate time-tracking methods we currently have available?
More accurate is, by definition, truer to the facts.   The moon should look reasonably full on the day your lunar tables say it is full.  The Julian tables do not pass this test.


If it's important for the moon to be really full on the day the tables say it's full, isn't it also important for the moon to be the first full moon after the vernal equinox if your lunar tables say it is? For all the Christians of the Southern Hemisphere, that's the first full moon after the fall equinox, and therefore inaccurate by a full six months.
Alexander Shmemann once hinted that he might favor a southern hemisphere Easter in that hemisphere's Springtime.  He wrote (For the Life of the World, 2nd edition, 4th printing, pp 55-56):
Quote
In fact, the understanding of feasts as historical commemorations which emerged little by little after Constantine meant a transformation of their initial meaning and, strange as it may seem, divorced them from their living connection with real time.  Thus in Australia today Easter is celebrated in the fall and no one seems to find it odd, because for several centuries the Christian calendar was understood as a system of holy days to be observed within timer, that is, among "profane" days, but without any special relationship to them.
He goes on to describe the relationship of Easter to Springtime in terms that suggest that the two are inseparable.  I conclude from his argument that the festival should occur as much as possible in the Mediterranean world's Spring season even if it can't be synchronized with Spring in other places.
Forþon we sealon efestan þas Easterlican þing to asmeagenne and to gehealdanne, þaet we magon cuman to þam Easterlican daege, þe aa byð, mid fullum glaedscipe and wynsumnysse and ecere blisse.--Byrhtferth of Ramsey

Offline primuspilus

  • Taxiarches
  • **********
  • Posts: 7,836
  • Inserting personal quote here.
    • Holy Trinity Orthodox Church
  • Faith: Western Rite Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: AOCNA - Diocese of Charleston and beyond
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2921 on: April 21, 2016, 12:47:47 PM »
Quote
Alexander Shmemann once hinted that he might favor a southern hemisphere Easter in that hemisphere's Springtime.  He wrote (For the Life of the World, 2nd edition, 4th printing, pp 55-56):
Kenyans would be really angry.

PP
"I confidently affirm that whoever calls himself Universal Bishop is the precursor of Antichrist"
Gregory the Great

"Never, never, never let anyone tell you that, in order to be Orthodox, you must also be eastern." St. John Maximovitch, The Wonderworker

Offline RaphaCam

  • High Elder
  • ******
  • Posts: 854
  • Sublime Augustine, wise writer of the City of God
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: Church of Poland - Archeparchy of Brazil
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2922 on: April 21, 2016, 01:01:13 PM »
Quote
Alexander Shmemann once hinted that he might favor a southern hemisphere Easter in that hemisphere's Springtime.  He wrote (For the Life of the World, 2nd edition, 4th printing, pp 55-56):
Kenyans would be really angry.

PP
Countries divided by the Equator would probably adjust to the time of the largest cities, or of the largest part of the country, as many longitudinally long countries do adjust time zones to regions. But, still, I'd list this as a bad idea for other reasons. We're not Pagans, the foundations of Pascha are pretty far from a Spring Full Moon celebration.
« Last Edit: April 21, 2016, 01:04:05 PM by RaphaCam »
Rise up, Lord, and let thine enemies be scattered; and let them that hate thee flee before thee. Return, o Lord, unto the many thousands of Israel.

Online Mor Ephrem

  • Supreme Commander of the Joint Armed Warrior Services (JAWS) of the Oriental Orthodox Church
  • Section Moderator
  • Protostrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 27,709
  • Fr Seraphim Rose and the Twin Towers
    • OrthodoxChristianity.net
  • Faith: Orthodox
  • Jurisdiction: But my heart belongs to Czech Lands
Re: Old vs. New Calendar?
« Reply #2923 on: April 21, 2016, 03:42:35 PM »
Quote
Alexander Shmemann once hinted that he might favor a southern hemisphere Easter in that hemisphere's Springtime.  He wrote (For the Life of the World, 2nd edition, 4th printing, pp 55-56):
Kenyans would be really angry.

PP
Countries divided by the Equator would probably adjust to the time of the largest cities, or of the largest part of the country, as many longitudinally long countries do adjust time zones to regions. But, still, I'd list this as a bad idea for other reasons. We're not Pagans, the foundations of Pascha are pretty far from a Spring Full Moon celebration.

True, but it is still a spring feast, not a "March/April no matter the season" feast.
Mor has an open appeal. This we knew already.

Mor suffers from Invincible Ignorance and is guaranteed salvation according to the Roman Catholic Church.