See the difference is one has to actually have done something to earn the other titles. A kid can state he is homosexual without actually having had sex.
This is one of the mistakes people now make as a result of the massive confusion assault on society regarding sexual sins. Your statement is absolutely incorrect. A person actually does have to engage in homosexuality to be considered a homosexual, otherwise it’s just a tendency or temptation. Again, apply your thought process to something else and see if it works. For example:
Billy saw a candy bar he really wanted and was tempted to take it, but didn’t, which still makes him a thief.
Sally was really in love with her boyfriend and wanted to engage in fornication, but didn’t, which still makes her a fornicator.
Sam was approached by a woman in his office to have sex with her, even though he was attracted to her and tempted, he declined, which still makes him an adulterer.
Doesn’t really work with anything else, unless that person obsesses over the temptation. So, if you don’t engage in homosexuality, you aren’t really homosexual. Let’s stop muddying the water here.
Also, I still haven’t figured out how supposedly millions of preteen boys identify as homosexual all by themselves without outside influence. Oh, that’s right, they don’t.
The BSA didn't endorse homosexuality,
That’s a matter of opinion, but at the very least they compromised on their morals. Acceptance of a deviant practice is an endorsement.
gays still can't be leaders
It’s coming. It always does.
it just won't kick kids, potentially confused kids, out over a matter that it has no control over and traditionally has not dealt with.
And did a splendid job up until now without needing to deal with it. You did pick the right word, confused, because that’s what is being done to these boys. They are being confused and now the BSA joins in on allowing it to take place.
The Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church, as far as I know, doesn't proclaim it a sin to be homosexual, only being unchaste is sinful.
The BSA states Scouts shouldn't be sexually active, but it doesn't inquire into boys' sexual activity either.
Then this subject should never have come up, but it did. I wonder why…
And yes, if your overweight your not suited for high adventure activities
Then change the activities. Inclusion is the key, right? Make them feel welcome and accepted. Is it their fault they were born with a tendency to be heavy?
Being overweigt myself I don't meet BMI requiremes either. Fat leaders had heart attacks in the back country. Fat scouts were injuring themselves in the back country. You know what costs alot and ruins everybody else's time? Having to have fat injured people helicoptered out of the back country. They can still go to summer camp just not high adventure bases.
And they are the only ones, right? No other injuries or medical concerns with skinny folks. Marathon runners have heart attacks. Marines get injured playing basketball. It sounds like the BSA is making a practice of including only that which it wants, which is sort of the reason the homosexual activists began their attack in the first place. Oh well, it all boils down to money I guess. Very sad.