OrthodoxChristianity.net
October 21, 2014, 10:08:16 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Reminder: No political discussions in the public fora.  If you do not have access to the private Politics Forum, please send a PM to Fr. George.
 
   Home   Help Calendar Contact Treasury Tags Login Register  
Pages: 1   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Was the Apostle Paul or any of the other Apostles Clergy?  (Read 626 times) Average Rating: 0
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Alveus Lacuna
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Posts: 6,917



« on: January 12, 2013, 08:55:19 PM »

Was the Apostle Paul, or any of the other apostles or evangelists any order of the clergy, or did they merely appoint bishops, presbyters, and deacons?
Logged
JamesR
Virginal Chicano Blood
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Eastern Orthodox (but doubtful)
Jurisdiction: Orthodox Church *of* America
Posts: 5,738


St. Augustine of Hippo pray for me!


« Reply #1 on: January 12, 2013, 09:05:47 PM »

I'm pretty sure that they rather appointed clergy because they were traveling around so much evangelising. However, I'm sure there were times when--upon visiting particular Churches--they acted as the clergy, maybe serving a Liturgy or two.
Logged

Quote
You're really on to something here. Tattoo to keep you from masturbating, chew to keep you from fornicating... it's a whole new world where you outsource your crosses. You're like a Christian entrepreneur or something.
Quote
James, you have problemz.
Ansgar
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: More than an inquirer, less than a catechumen
Jurisdiction: Exarchate of orthodox churches of russian tradition in western Europe
Posts: 2,988


Keep your mind in hell and do not despair


« Reply #2 on: January 12, 2013, 09:16:14 PM »

Well, St. Peter was Bishop of Antioch, St. Mark was Bishop of Alexandria and St. Linus was Bishop of Rome.
Logged

Do not be cast down over the struggle - the Lord loves a brave warrior. The Lord loves the soul that is valiant.

-St Silouan the athonite
sheenj
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Oriental Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Indian/Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church
Posts: 1,402


St. Gregorios of Parumala, pray for us...


« Reply #3 on: January 12, 2013, 09:21:32 PM »

Well, St. Peter was Bishop of Antioch, St. Mark was Bishop of Alexandria and St. Linus was Bishop of Rome.

You're forgetting St. James, the First Archbishop of Jerusalem.
Logged
Melodist
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: The Faith That Established The Universe
Jurisdiction: AOANA
Posts: 2,523



« Reply #4 on: January 12, 2013, 09:39:57 PM »

Yes.

1Tim 4:14
Neglect not the gift that is in thee, which was given thee by prophecy, with the laying on of the hands of the presbytery.

2Tim1:6
Wherefore I put thee in remembrance that thou stir up the gift of God, which is in thee by the putting on of my hands.
Logged

And FWIW, these are our Fathers too, you know.

Made Perfect in Weakness - Latest Post: The Son of God
Ansgar
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: More than an inquirer, less than a catechumen
Jurisdiction: Exarchate of orthodox churches of russian tradition in western Europe
Posts: 2,988


Keep your mind in hell and do not despair


« Reply #5 on: January 12, 2013, 09:43:33 PM »

Well, St. Peter was Bishop of Antioch, St. Mark was Bishop of Alexandria and St. Linus was Bishop of Rome.

You're forgetting St. James, the First Archbishop of Jerusalem.

Right  Smiley
Logged

Do not be cast down over the struggle - the Lord loves a brave warrior. The Lord loves the soul that is valiant.

-St Silouan the athonite
choy
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,316


« Reply #6 on: January 12, 2013, 09:49:50 PM »

Well, St. Peter was Bishop of Antioch, St. Mark was Bishop of Alexandria and St. Linus was Bishop of Rome.

You're forgetting St. James, the First Archbishop of Jerusalem.

St. James was never an Apostle.  This is St. James the brother of Our Lord, not St. James the Great (son of Zebedee, brother of St. John the Apostle) or St. James the Less (son of Alphaeus).
Logged
LBK
Toumarches
************
Online Online

Faith: Orthodox
Posts: 11,144


Holy Father Patrick, pray for us!


« Reply #7 on: January 12, 2013, 10:25:02 PM »

Quote
St. James was never an Apostle.  

St James, Brother of the Lord, is indeed an apostle. In church calendars, his is the first name on the list of the Apostles of the Seventy (feast day January 4). The Seven Deacons (Stephen, Laurence, Nicanor, etc) are also listed among them.
« Last Edit: January 12, 2013, 10:27:10 PM by LBK » Logged
sheenj
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Oriental Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Indian/Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church
Posts: 1,402


St. Gregorios of Parumala, pray for us...


« Reply #8 on: January 12, 2013, 10:36:59 PM »

Quote
St. James was never an Apostle.  

St James, Brother of the Lord, is indeed an apostle. In church calendars, his is the first name on the list of the Apostles of the Seventy (feast day January 4). The Seven Deacons (Stephen, Laurence, Nicanor, etc) are also listed among them.

Yup, in my church we remember him in our Diptychs as:

Quote
The Venerable St. James, the First Archbishop of Jerusalem, Apostle and Martyr.
Logged
mike
Stratopedarches
**************
Offline Offline

Posts: 21,467


WWW
« Reply #9 on: January 13, 2013, 10:20:22 AM »

Quote
St. James was never an Apostle. 

St James, Brother of the Lord, is indeed an apostle. In church calendars, his is the first name on the list of the Apostles of the Seventy (feast day January 4). The Seven Deacons (Stephen, Laurence, Nicanor, etc) are also listed among them.

Does that mean that the 70 did not have the permission for performing ordinations as the 12 (+ Paul) had unlike they had been ordained by one of the 12 (or Paul)?
Logged

Byzantinism
no longer posting here
dhinuus
Elder
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 481



« Reply #10 on: January 13, 2013, 10:46:55 AM »

Does that mean that the 70 did not have the permission for performing ordinations as the 12 (+ Paul) had unlike they had been ordained by one of the 12 (or Paul)?
This is a good question. I also look forward to the answer.

St. Stephen, St. James the brother of our Lord and St. Mark the Evangelist are all members of the "70".

1) Of this St. Stephen was a deacon.  If he was a deacon could he also have been a presbyter ? 

2) These is some tradition of St. Mark the Evangelist being ordained by St. Peter one of the 12. So does this mean that the 70 had to be ordained by one of the 12 to be a presbyter / episcopa?

3) If that is the case, was St. James the brother of our Lord and Bishop of Jersusalem, ever ordained by anyone of the 12 ?
Logged

NULL
dhinuus
Elder
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 481



« Reply #11 on: January 16, 2013, 11:56:30 AM »

--bump--- 
I was hoping that someone would shed more light on this. Was it necessary for the 70 to be ordained by one of the 12 for them to become priests?  In other words was St. James of Jerusalem and St. Mark the Evangelists ordained by one of the 12?  If not, why is St. Stephen one of the 70 only a deacon why St. James and St. Mark also of the 70 bishops of Jerusalem and Alexandria respectively ?
Logged

NULL
Benjamin the Red
Recovering Calvinist
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Catholic
Jurisdiction: Orthodox Church in America, Diocese of Dallas and the South ||| American Carpatho-Russian Orthodox Diocese
Posts: 1,601


Have mercy on me, O God, have mercy on me.


« Reply #12 on: January 16, 2013, 11:38:25 PM »

I always operated under the assumption that the Twelve were the leaders of the early Church, above the episcopate, since one bishop cannot ordain another bishop and yet the Apostles did (such as St. Peter ordaining St. Linus and St. Clement as bishops). The 70, however, were sent by Christ in the Gospels but did not serve the same function as the Twelve. Some were later bishops, like St. Mark or St. Timothy and others were not, like St. Stephen, who was a deacon.
Logged

"Hades is not a place, no, but a state of the soul. It begins here on earth. Just so, paradise begins in the soul of a man here in the earthly life. Here we already have contact with the divine..." -St. John, Wonderworker of Shanghai and San Francisco, Homily On the Sunday of Orthodoxy
Father H
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian--God's One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church
Jurisdiction: UOCofUSA-Ecumenical Patriarchate
Posts: 2,611



« Reply #13 on: January 17, 2013, 12:06:55 AM »

--bump--- 
I was hoping that someone would shed more light on this. Was it necessary for the 70 to be ordained by one of the 12 for them to become priests?  In other words was St. James of Jerusalem and St. Mark the Evangelists ordained by one of the 12?  If not, why is St. Stephen one of the 70 only a deacon why St. James and St. Mark also of the 70 bishops of Jerusalem and Alexandria respectively ?

The confusion arises because many of the 70 became apostate, and a few martyred early.  They needed replaced (just as with the twelve replacing Judas, up to one generation out until Bishoprics were established, and then Bishops took over the Apostolic office once Bishoprics were established).  The originals of the 70 (of which James was one) were appointed by Christ Himself as reported in the Gospel of Luke.  The replacements who fell away were appointed by the 12 (Timothy was an appointment in place of an apostate among the 70, for example).  Afterward, it was the 12 that appointed numerous amounts of the 70 as a Bishop in a certain place

After they had begun to "appoint presbyters in every church" (Acts 14.23), we see that neither the 12 nor the 70 are replaced either by reason of martyrdom or apostasy, for the office is held now "in a place" by Bishops and Presbyters.   
Logged
LBK
Toumarches
************
Online Online

Faith: Orthodox
Posts: 11,144


Holy Father Patrick, pray for us!


« Reply #14 on: January 17, 2013, 12:08:24 AM »

Quote
I always operated under the assumption that the Twelve were the leaders of the early Church, above the episcopate,

Iconographically, this is true. None of the Twelve are ever portrayed as bishops, but as teachers. This is signified by the clavulus, the broad vertical stripe extending from the shoulder, often painted in gold, which was a symbol of authority in the Greco-Roman world. Christ, the Great Teacher, is also portrayed in this way.

The apostles of the Seventy, such as St James the Brother of the Lord, who served as bishops, are portrayed in their vestments. St Mark the Evangelist, who, while he served as bishop, is never shown in vestments, but as an apostle and teacher. Writing one of the Gospels, after all, would be seen as a higher calling than that of bishop.
Logged
Tags:
Pages: 1   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.068 seconds with 41 queries.