OrthodoxChristianity.net
May 22, 2013, 12:52:40 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: If you don't like the Lent theme or it's hard for you to read posts with it, feel free to revert back to the old theme in your profile on the left menu "Look and Layout Preferences."
 
   Home   Help Calendar Contact Treasury Tags Login Register  
Pages: 1   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: David Bentley Hart vs. Edward Feser  (Read 206 times) Average Rating: 0
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
truthseeker32
Member
***
Online Online

Faith: ex-LDS, Inquiring into RCC and EOC
Posts: 159



« on: April 24, 2013, 03:53:45 PM »

Has anyone been following the dialogue taking place between these two? If you have been following, I would love to hear your thoughts on the debate. Here are the links in order:

Hart: http://www.firstthings.com/article/2013/02/is-ought-and-natures-laws-1
Feser's response: http://www.firstthings.com/onthesquare/2013/03/a-christian-hart-a-humean-head
Hart's rebuttal: http://www.firstthings.com/article/2013/05/nature-loves-to-hide
Feser's latest response: http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2013/04/9978/
Logged
Clemente
Member
***
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Europe
Posts: 183


« Reply #1 on: April 24, 2013, 04:20:53 PM »

Good stuff. Thanks.

Of course, Hart wins. He always does, although sometimes only in his mind.
Logged
truthseeker32
Member
***
Online Online

Faith: ex-LDS, Inquiring into RCC and EOC
Posts: 159



« Reply #2 on: April 24, 2013, 06:16:36 PM »

Good stuff. Thanks.

Of course, Hart wins. He always does, although sometimes only in his mind.
Haha, I think both Hart and Feser are hard headed and too smart for their own good. Chances are they will continue to talk past one another without any concession.
Logged
orthonorm
Protostrator
***************
Offline Offline

Posts: 11,821


The Slippery Slope of Modalism


« Reply #3 on: April 24, 2013, 07:47:13 PM »

Has anyone been following the dialogue taking place between these two? If you have been following, I would love to hear your thoughts on the debate. Here are the links in order:

Hart: http://www.firstthings.com/article/2013/02/is-ought-and-natures-laws-1
Feser's response: http://www.firstthings.com/onthesquare/2013/03/a-christian-hart-a-humean-head
Hart's rebuttal: http://www.firstthings.com/article/2013/05/nature-loves-to-hide
Feser's latest response: http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2013/04/9978/

I haven't read this, but thank you for posting. I look forward to it!
Logged

Quote from: Christian on Monday
We cannot legislate morality by passing laws controlling firearms. The only evil we can combat lies within our hearts.
Quote from: Christian on Tuesday
We need stronger laws to protect the moral foundation of society against the evil of gay marriage.
Papist
Patriarch of Pontification
Moderated
Stratopedarches
**************
Offline Offline

Faith: Catholic
Jurisdiction: Latin Church: Archdiocese of Santa Fe
Posts: 10,655


Truth, Justice, and the American Way


« Reply #4 on: April 26, 2013, 01:12:32 PM »

Good stuff. Thanks.

Of course, Hart wins. He always does, although sometimes only in his mind.
Haha, I think both Hart and Feser are hard headed and too smart for their own good. Chances are they will continue to talk past one another without any concession.
Feser's hardheadedness is one of the things I love about him.
Logged

"The only-begotten Son of God, wanting us to be partakers of his divinity, assumed our human nature so that, having become man, he might make men gods." - St. Thomas Aquinas
Tags: philosophy  natural law 
Pages: 1   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.051 seconds with 33 queries.