OrthodoxChristianity.net
June 18, 2013, 01:51:11 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: If you don't like the Lent theme or it's hard for you to read posts with it, feel free to revert back to the old theme in your profile on the left menu "Look and Layout Preferences."
 
   Home   Help Calendar Contact Treasury Tags Login Register  
Pages: 1   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Constantinople Papism  (Read 142 times) Average Rating: 0
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Gunnarr
Warned
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 415


« on: February 01, 2013, 06:16:23 PM »

I don't know if this is in the correct place in the forums, but i imagine it might provoke outrage so i put it here.

I went to the wikipedia page of the Council of Chalcedon and noticed a new addition stating that canon 28 was of disputed validity. I went to the new source for that, putting me here:

(American Orthodox Institute website, i dont know what it is)

http://www.aoiusa.org/canon-28-and-eastern-papalism-cause-or-effect/

I read the very long article and I found it very interesting as I have not heard arguments such as this before.


Anyway, if anyone is bored and has already done their prayers for the day , go ahead and read it and comment what you think of it.


I do not have much to say about it really, because I do not know if I can trust the claims. but it seems to have been written by a learned mind. so yeah what do you crazy people here think of it?
Logged
Cyrillic
Akoimetes
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Christian
Posts: 4,398


Ἄνδρα μοι ἔννεπε, Μοῦσα.

Botaneiates
WWW
« Reply #1 on: February 01, 2013, 06:34:25 PM »

Canon 28 isn't disputed in the article but the Phanar's interpretation of it is.
Logged

All ye self-proclaimed intellectuals, come and read Lucian in the Book Club!
Aindriú
Faster! Funnier!
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Cynical
Jurisdiction: Vestibule of Hell
Posts: 3,891



WWW
« Reply #2 on: February 01, 2013, 08:20:25 PM »

Canon 28 isn't disputed in the article but the Phanar's interpretation of it is.

That's not what I read.
Logged


I'm going to need this.
Tags:
Pages: 1   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.05 seconds with 31 queries.