|
Jetavan
|
 |
« on: November 19, 2012, 03:49:16 PM » |
|
Bishops, priests and religious should wear the formal long robes of a cassock during most occasions when visiting Rome, a high-ranking Vatican official has said. Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, the Vatican's Secretariat of State, made the request for the formal dress in a letter released during last month's Synod of Bishops. .... "The very example of those who, sealed with the episcopal dignity, are faithful to the daily use of the cassock proper to them, during office hours, becomes an explicit encouragement for all, including for the Episcopates and for those who visit the Roman Curia and Vatican City," Bertone writes. The cassock is an ankle-length robe distinguished by a series of buttons down the front and a sash worn across the waist. While typically seen worn by bishops and cardinals, priests in many parts of the world are more often seen instead wearing button down shirts with clerical collars.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If you will, you can become all flame. Extra caritatem nulla salus. In order to become whole, take the "I" out of "holiness". I'm not a witch. Ἄνω σχῶμεν τὰς καρδίας "Those who say religion has nothing to do with politics do not know what religion is." -- Mohandas Gandhi Y dduw bo'r diolch.
|
|
|
|
choy
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: November 19, 2012, 04:16:50 PM » |
|
The 'Doxification of Rome has begun 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Alpo
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: November 19, 2012, 04:21:38 PM » |
|
The 'Doxification of Rome has begun  If the order was coming straight from the pope I would be tempted to shout spontaneous "AXIOS!"
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Just a little reminder: this forum is not called OrthodoxChristianityUSA.net 
|
|
|
|
Jetavan
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: November 19, 2012, 04:47:14 PM » |
|
The 'Doxification of Rome has begun  If the order was coming straight from the pope I would be tempted to shout spontaneous "AXIOS!" Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, the Vatican's Secretariat of State, made the request for the formal dress in a letter released during last month's Synod of Bishops. It came at the bequest of Pope Benedict XVI, reports a posting at veteran Italian journalist Sandro Magister's site at the Italian newsmagazine l'Espresso. Bertone's letter, first made public Monday but dated Oct. 15, asks bishops and cardinals "kindly to guarantee" the observance of a 1982 letter by Pope John Paul II on the matter. That letter, written by the deceased pontiff to the then-vicar general for the diocese of Rome, asked that priests wear the more formal dress as a "distinguishing mark" which contributes to "the beauty of the priest in his external behavior."
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: November 19, 2012, 04:47:37 PM by Jetavan »
|
Logged
|
If you will, you can become all flame. Extra caritatem nulla salus. In order to become whole, take the "I" out of "holiness". I'm not a witch. Ἄνω σχῶμεν τὰς καρδίας "Those who say religion has nothing to do with politics do not know what religion is." -- Mohandas Gandhi Y dduw bo'r diolch.
|
|
|
biro
Ursus maritimus
Site Supporter
Stratopedarches
   
Offline
Faith: Raised Roman Catholic; now attend GOA
Jurisdiction: Metropolis of Atlanta
Posts: 9,606
Και κλήρονομον δείξον με, ζωής της αιωνίου
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: November 19, 2012, 07:25:09 PM » |
|
The 'Doxification of Rome has begun  What a shame.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
phthalyl.podomatic.com
the-cornet.blogspot.com
|
|
|
|
Papist
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: November 19, 2012, 07:30:02 PM » |
|
The 'Doxification of Rome has begun  More of a return to our own traditions.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"The only-begotten Son of God, wanting us to be partakers of his divinity, assumed our human nature so that, having become man, he might make men gods." - St. Thomas Aquinas
|
|
|
|
choy
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: November 19, 2012, 07:33:27 PM » |
|
The 'Doxification of Rome has begun  More of a return to our own traditions. Precisely 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Maria
Orthodox Christian
Archon
Offline
Posts: 3,439
O most Holy Theotokos, save us.
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: November 19, 2012, 08:54:40 PM » |
|
The 'Doxification of Rome has begun  More of a return to our own traditions. Precisely  Would that all Orthodox Christian priests and bishops also wear the frock or raissa when in public.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Glory to Jesus Christ! Glory to Him forever!
|
|
|
|
choy
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: November 19, 2012, 08:56:32 PM » |
|
Would that all Orthodox Christian priests and bishops also wear the frock or raissa when in public.
Do they? The few that I know do, not sure if all do. I guess if they have secular jobs or something, you don't expect them wearing the raissa to work. I don't know how much of their secular life do they wear their raissa. Might vary I suspect.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
orthonorm
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: November 19, 2012, 09:08:59 PM » |
|
Would that all Orthodox Christian priests and bishops also wear the frock or raissa when in public.
Do they? The few that I know do, not sure if all do. I guess if they have secular jobs or something, you don't expect them wearing the raissa to work. I don't know how much of their secular life do they wear their raissa. Might vary I suspect. Are you ESL? Maria is using a somewhat dated construction of the subjunctive minus the oft included exclamation point. Would that x!Means something like: I wish x were so.The Would that x! construction is a bit more emphatic. Given the subjunctive usage you can infer the opposite is the case.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: November 19, 2012, 09:10:21 PM by orthonorm »
|
Logged
|
We cannot legislate morality by passing laws controlling firearms. The only evil we can combat lies within our hearts. We need stronger laws to protect the moral foundation of society against the evil of gay marriage.
|
|
|
|
Jetavan
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: November 19, 2012, 09:16:50 PM » |
|
Would that all Orthodox Christian priests and bishops also wear the frock or raissa when in public.
Do they? The few that I know do, not sure if all do. I guess if they have secular jobs or something, you don't expect them wearing the raissa to work. I don't know how much of their secular life do they wear their raissa. Might vary I suspect. Are you ESL? Maria is using a somewhat dated construction of the subjunctive minus the oft included exclamation point. Would that x!Means something like: I wish x were so.The Would that x! construction is a bit more emphatic. Given the subjunctive usage you can infer the opposite is the case. Truth is subjunctive.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If you will, you can become all flame. Extra caritatem nulla salus. In order to become whole, take the "I" out of "holiness". I'm not a witch. Ἄνω σχῶμεν τὰς καρδίας "Those who say religion has nothing to do with politics do not know what religion is." -- Mohandas Gandhi Y dduw bo'r diolch.
|
|
|
|
orthonorm
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: November 19, 2012, 09:18:40 PM » |
|
Would that all Orthodox Christian priests and bishops also wear the frock or raissa when in public.
Do they? The few that I know do, not sure if all do. I guess if they have secular jobs or something, you don't expect them wearing the raissa to work. I don't know how much of their secular life do they wear their raissa. Might vary I suspect. Are you ESL? Maria is using a somewhat dated construction of the subjunctive minus the oft included exclamation point. Would that x!Means something like: I wish x were so.The Would that x! construction is a bit more emphatic. Given the subjunctive usage you can infer the opposite is the case. Truth is subjunctive. That it were!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
We cannot legislate morality by passing laws controlling firearms. The only evil we can combat lies within our hearts. We need stronger laws to protect the moral foundation of society against the evil of gay marriage.
|
|
|
|
choy
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: November 19, 2012, 09:21:16 PM » |
|
Would that all Orthodox Christian priests and bishops also wear the frock or raissa when in public.
Do they? The few that I know do, not sure if all do. I guess if they have secular jobs or something, you don't expect them wearing the raissa to work. I don't know how much of their secular life do they wear their raissa. Might vary I suspect. Are you ESL? Maria is using a somewhat dated construction of the subjunctive minus the oft included exclamation point. Would that x!Means something like: I wish x were so.The Would that x! construction is a bit more emphatic. Given the subjunctive usage you can infer the opposite is the case. Not everyone speaks the same kind of English y'know.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
orthonorm
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: November 19, 2012, 09:29:37 PM » |
|
Would that all Orthodox Christian priests and bishops also wear the frock or raissa when in public.
Do they? The few that I know do, not sure if all do. I guess if they have secular jobs or something, you don't expect them wearing the raissa to work. I don't know how much of their secular life do they wear their raissa. Might vary I suspect. Are you ESL? Maria is using a somewhat dated construction of the subjunctive minus the oft included exclamation point. Would that x!Means something like: I wish x were so.The Would that x! construction is a bit more emphatic. Given the subjunctive usage you can infer the opposite is the case. Not everyone speaks the same kind of English y'know. Yeah, except that this use of the subjunctive is pretty much part of the Standard Language. If someone is a bit educated and literate in English, this would either be clear or seem perhaps a bit dated. Sorry if you are not ESL. Didn't mean to offend.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
We cannot legislate morality by passing laws controlling firearms. The only evil we can combat lies within our hearts. We need stronger laws to protect the moral foundation of society against the evil of gay marriage.
|
|
|
|
choy
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: November 19, 2012, 09:34:40 PM » |
|
Yeah, except that this use of the subjunctive is pretty much part of the Standard Language. If someone is a bit educated and literate in English, this would either be clear or seem perhaps a bit dated.
Sorry if you are not ESL. Didn't mean to offend.
No, I am ESL. But that still doesn't change the fact that the use of English is different from place to place. Even within the United States. Though I've pretty much used English my entire life, though it is not my native language and not used as much in our daily life back where I come from. But English is the second official language there and taught in all levels of school. Plus there is good access to English language TV programming. Growing up even the Japanese anime were translated locally to English instead of Filipino. Only in more recent times has the foreign non-English shows been translated to Filipino instead of English. And I do live in Canada now.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
orthonorm
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: November 19, 2012, 09:45:39 PM » |
|
Yeah, except that this use of the subjunctive is pretty much part of the Standard Language. If someone is a bit educated and literate in English, this would either be clear or seem perhaps a bit dated.
Sorry if you are not ESL. Didn't mean to offend.
No, I am ESL. But that still doesn't change the fact that the use of English is different from place to place. Even within the United States. Though I've pretty much used English my entire life, though it is not my native language and not used as much in our daily life back where I come from. But English is the second official language there and taught in all levels of school. Plus there is good access to English language TV programming. Growing up even the Japanese anime were translated locally to English instead of Filipino. Only in more recent times has the foreign non-English shows been translated to Filipino instead of English. And I do live in Canada now. OK, So I stand correct. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
We cannot legislate morality by passing laws controlling firearms. The only evil we can combat lies within our hearts. We need stronger laws to protect the moral foundation of society against the evil of gay marriage.
|
|
|
Basil 320
Site Supporter
OC.net guru
   
Offline
Faith: Eastern Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America, Holy Metropolis of Pittsburgh
Posts: 2,293
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: November 19, 2012, 10:11:24 PM » |
|
Good development. The rule should be applied to clergy attire while conducting official responsibilities on parish property too.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"...Strengthen the Orthodox Community..."
|
|
|
FatherGiryus
You are being watched.
High Elder
Offline
Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Patriarchate of Antioch - NA
Posts: 1,806
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: November 20, 2012, 12:18:30 AM » |
|
Years back, I was at a Greek festival during a very hot summer, and, as I do most of the time, I was in rasso (rather than the clergy shirt & suit). They asked me to sit next to a senior priest from the 'Old School' (suit, plastic collar that goes all the way around, no beard, etc.).
He looked at me with disgust, then said, "Why do you wear that?"
I looked at him and said, "You are wearing a black wool suit, long-sleeve polyesther shirt with a thick collar, and an undershirt, right? I'm wearing a cotton cassock with a t-shirt underneith... who's baking to death in this sun right now?"
He looked totally surprised, then nodded. "I guess that's not a bad idea on a day like today."
We both laughed. I don't insult him, because he served honorably for 50 years in a very different world. But, times have changed, and I think the Church is not so afraid of looking 'foreign' anymore...Good development. The rule should be applied to clergy attire while conducting official responsibilities on parish property too.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Achronos
What's so good about Cincinnati? You like it? You think Cincinnati is cool? I've never heard anyone say, 'I'm going to Cincinnati on vacation.'
Site Supporter
Warned
Hoplitarches
   
Offline
Faith: Building Steam with a Grain of Salt
Jurisdiction: Just as little is seen in pure light as in pure darkness.
Posts: 9,307
And we gave him the Rolling Stone cover?!
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: November 20, 2012, 12:23:33 AM » |
|
Good development. The rule should be applied to clergy attire while conducting official responsibilities on parish property too.
Why does Met. Phillip not allow the clergy to wear cassocks?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
“Without music, life would be a mistake.” “The last capitalist we hang shall be the one who sold us the rope.” "Face the facts of being what you are, for that is what changes what you are." "We see at once that the words absolute, divine, eternal, and so on do not express what is implied in them.
|
|
|
Nephi
Elder
Offline
Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Antiochian
Posts: 1,236
Ecumenism Lite
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: November 20, 2012, 12:34:27 AM » |
|
Good development. The rule should be applied to clergy attire while conducting official responsibilities on parish property too.
Why does Met. Phillip not allow the clergy to wear cassocks? He doesn't? I'm afraid I can't tell priestly garb apart at all, but I'm pretty sure I see my priest wearing a cassock-looking outfit after liturgy in coffee hour...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Achronos
What's so good about Cincinnati? You like it? You think Cincinnati is cool? I've never heard anyone say, 'I'm going to Cincinnati on vacation.'
Site Supporter
Warned
Hoplitarches
   
Offline
Faith: Building Steam with a Grain of Salt
Jurisdiction: Just as little is seen in pure light as in pure darkness.
Posts: 9,307
And we gave him the Rolling Stone cover?!
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: November 20, 2012, 12:52:40 AM » |
|
Good development. The rule should be applied to clergy attire while conducting official responsibilities on parish property too.
Why does Met. Phillip not allow the clergy to wear cassocks? He doesn't? I'm afraid I can't tell priestly garb apart at all, but I'm pretty sure I see my priest wearing a cassock-looking outfit after liturgy in coffee hour... I thought Met Phillip had all the priests required to wear a collarino outside of the parish. Maybe I was wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
“Without music, life would be a mistake.” “The last capitalist we hang shall be the one who sold us the rope.” "Face the facts of being what you are, for that is what changes what you are." "We see at once that the words absolute, divine, eternal, and so on do not express what is implied in them.
|
|
|
Nephi
Elder
Offline
Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Antiochian
Posts: 1,236
Ecumenism Lite
|
 |
« Reply #21 on: November 20, 2012, 12:56:42 AM » |
|
I thought Met Phillip had all the priests required to wear a collarino outside of the parish. Maybe I was wrong.
Oh, well I guess it is still in the parish. Nevermind then. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Cognomen
Site Supporter
High Elder
   
Offline
Faith: Orthodox Catholic
Jurisdiction: Phyletism Rules, OK
Posts: 1,767
You can run...
|
 |
« Reply #22 on: November 20, 2012, 02:26:28 AM » |
|
Would that [mean that] all Orthodox Christian priests and bishops also wear the frock or raissa when in public.
Do they? The few that I know do, not sure if all do. I guess if they have secular jobs or something, you don't expect them wearing the raissa to work. I don't know how much of their secular life do they wear their raissa. Might vary I suspect. Are you ESL? Maria is using a somewhat dated construction of the subjunctive minus the oft included exclamation point. Would that x!Means something like: I wish x were so.The Would that x! construction is a bit more emphatic. Given the subjunctive usage you can infer the opposite is the case. Funny. I just thought she left a couple of words out.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Paint a bunch of icons of our Lord and the saints and then kiss them. Also, pray to Mary after she dies in the future."
~ The Epistle of St. Paul to the Antiochians, 46 AD.
|
|
|
Maria
Orthodox Christian
Archon
Offline
Posts: 3,439
O most Holy Theotokos, save us.
|
 |
« Reply #23 on: November 20, 2012, 02:45:46 AM » |
|
Would that [mean that] all Orthodox Christian priests and bishops also wear the frock or raissa when in public.
Do they? The few that I know do, not sure if all do. I guess if they have secular jobs or something, you don't expect them wearing the raissa to work. I don't know how much of their secular life do they wear their raissa. Might vary I suspect. Are you ESL? Maria is using a somewhat dated construction of the subjunctive minus the oft included exclamation point. Would that x!Means something like: I wish x were so.The Would that x! construction is a bit more emphatic. Given the subjunctive usage you can infer the opposite is the case. Funny. I just thought she left a couple of words out. No, I did not leave out any words, and yes, I would have used an exclamation after that statement. Sorry. However, I have been busy making Christmas gifts for my parish and the nearby monastery, so I quickly posted and left to finish a project.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Glory to Jesus Christ! Glory to Him forever!
|
|
|
|