|
JamesR
|
 |
« on: November 17, 2012, 09:46:29 PM » |
|
Is the classic Christmas hymn a Christological heresy because of the following line, "Veiled in flesh the Godhead see,"? This line--'VEILED in flesh'--seems to undermine the Divinity of Jesus' human nature. It makes it appear as if God only wore human flesh/looked like a human, but that He wasn't truly human. What's the name of this heresy again?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
You're really on to something here. Tattoo to keep you from masturbating, chew to keep you from fornicating... it's a whole new world where you outsource your crosses. You're like a Christian entrepreneur or something. James, you have problemz. |
|
|
|
Tallitot
|
|
« Reply #1 on: November 17, 2012, 10:09:20 PM » |
|
Do you mean "Herald Angels"?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Proverbs 22:7
|
|
|
MarkAC
Newbie
 Offline
Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Antiochian Archdiocese of North America
Posts: 5
|
|
« Reply #2 on: November 17, 2012, 10:37:14 PM » |
|
I think the heresy you are thinking of is docetism, which taught that Christ only seemed to be human; I believe certain forms of Gnosticism taught this also.
Although the line you quote could be taken that way if considered in isolation, I think that if you consider the following lines along with it, you get a different impression. In the version I learned, after "Veiled in flesh the Godhead see" comes:
"Hail the incarnate deity,
Pleased as man with men to dwell,
Jesus our Immanuel."
There is a clear indication that Jesus is God "incarnate", and that He is a man. So, whatever one may think of Christmas carols, or western hymns in general, I think we can absolve this particular carol of the docetist heresy.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
orthonorm
|
|
« Reply #3 on: November 17, 2012, 10:58:54 PM » |
|
Do you mean "Herald Angels"? I think the heresy you are thinking of is docetism, which taught that Christ only seemed to be human; I believe certain forms of Gnosticism taught this also.
Although the line you quote could be taken that way if considered in isolation, I think that if you consider the following lines along with it, you get a different impression. In the version I learned, after "Veiled in flesh the Godhead see" comes:
"Hail the incarnate deity,
Pleased as man with men to dwell,
Jesus our Immanuel."
There is a clear indication that Jesus is God "incarnate", and that He is a man. So, whatever one may think of Christmas carols, or western hymns in general, I think we can absolve this particular carol of the docetist heresy. You have to admire his persistence . . . James gives good internetz. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Ignorance is not a lack, but a passion.
|
|
|
|
Cavaradossi
|
|
« Reply #4 on: November 17, 2012, 11:02:47 PM » |
|
Ah yes, the old heresy of being written by Western Christians, a particularly pernicious heresy prevalent since the time of Augustine, the first Western Christian who dared to write extensively.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: November 17, 2012, 11:03:58 PM by Cavaradossi »
|
Logged
|
Be comforted, and have faith, O Israel, for your God is infinitely simple and one, composed of no parts.
|
|
|
|
ZealousZeal
|
|
« Reply #5 on: November 17, 2012, 11:12:02 PM » |
|
Ah yes, the old heresy of being written by Western Christians, a particularly pernicious heresy prevalent since the time of Augustine, the first Western Christian who dared to write extensively.
 Westernism... Like modernism, only worse. And way more geographic. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"For this God is our God forever and ever; He will be our guide, even to the end." Psalm 48:14
|
|
|
biro
Excelsior
Site Supporter
Toumarches
Offline
Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Greek Orthodox Church
Posts: 12,647
Και κλήρονομον δείξον με, ζωής της αιωνίου
|
|
« Reply #6 on: November 17, 2012, 11:17:54 PM » |
|
There is an angel named Harold?
I must know more!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Charlie Rose: If you could change one thing about the world, what would it be? Fran Lebowitz: Everything. There is not one thing with which I am satisfied. http://spcasuncoast.org/ |
|
|
|
William
|
|
« Reply #7 on: November 17, 2012, 11:19:17 PM » |
|
Ah yes, the old heresy of being written by Western Christians, a particularly pernicious heresy prevalent since the time of Augustine, the first Western Christian who dared to write extensively.
Yes, because JamesR is well known to be a member of the Augustine hating club. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Apart from moral conduct, all that man thinks himself able to do in order to become acceptable to God is mere superstition and religious folly. - Immanuel Kant
Leave there thy gift before the altar, and go thy way; first be reconciled to thy brother, and then come and offer thy gift. - Matt. 5:24
|
|
|
|
LBK
|
|
« Reply #8 on: November 17, 2012, 11:20:33 PM » |
|
There is an angel named Harold?
I must know more!
Well, the angel in It's a Wonderful Life was called Clarence. Close enough?  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Cavaradossi
|
|
« Reply #9 on: November 17, 2012, 11:27:56 PM » |
|
Ah yes, the old heresy of being written by Western Christians, a particularly pernicious heresy prevalent since the time of Augustine, the first Western Christian who dared to write extensively.
Yes, because JamesR is well known to be a member of the Augustine hating club. I would know. I'm the one who inducted him. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Be comforted, and have faith, O Israel, for your God is infinitely simple and one, composed of no parts.
|
|
|
FormerReformer
Convertodox of the convertodox
Site Supporter
Archon
Offline
Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: I'll take (e) for "all of the above"
Posts: 2,402
|
|
« Reply #10 on: November 17, 2012, 11:58:37 PM » |
|
Ah yes, the old heresy of being written by Western Christians, a particularly pernicious heresy prevalent since the time of Augustine, the first Western Christian who dared to write extensively.
Westernism... Like modernism, only worse. And way more geographic. What are you talking about? All the cool kids know that Westernism and Modernism are the same thing. You can't have the Enlightenment without Scholasticism.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Funny," said Lancelot, "how the people who can't pray say that prayers are not answered, however much the people who can pray say they are." TH White Oh, no: I've succumbed to Hyperdoxy! |
|
|
Eastern Mind
Hi! I'm Olaf and I like warm hugs!
High Elder
Offline
Faith: Orthodox Hopeful
Jurisdiction: Greece
Posts: 713
|
|
« Reply #11 on: November 18, 2012, 06:46:50 AM » |
|
There is an angel named Harold?
I must know more!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dMWn2oDAUVc |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"ALL THE GODS OF THE HINDUS ARE DEMONS HAHAHAHAHA!!"
|
|
|
|
Severian
|
|
« Reply #12 on: November 18, 2012, 06:51:16 AM » |
|
On a slightly different note:
Is it OK for an Orthodox Christian to listen and sing western Christmas carols?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Taking a temporary hiatus from posting. PM me if you wish to contact me as I will still be signing in on occasion. Please forgive me if my posts have lacked humility, charity, or tact.
NOTE: Some of my older posts (particularly those prior to late 2012) may not reflect my current views.
|
|
|
|
Severian
|
|
« Reply #13 on: November 18, 2012, 06:55:15 AM » |
|
Is the classic Christmas hymn a Christological heresy because of the following line, "Veiled in flesh the Godhead see,"? This line--'VEILED in flesh'--seems to undermine the Divinity of Jesus' human nature. It makes it appear as if God only wore human flesh/looked like a human, but that He wasn't truly human. What's the name of this heresy again?
It is not necessarily heretical, but one could misconstrue it as Doceticism if they really wanted to. "[Christ] who, being in the form of God, did not consider it robbery to be equal with God, but made Himself of no reputation, taking the form of a bondservant, and coming in the likeness of men. And being found in appearance as a man, He humbled Himself and became obedient to the point of death, even the death of the cross." -Phillipians 2:6-8 Here, St. Paul says that Christ appeared as a man, but it is quite clear in context what he means by "appeared." |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: November 18, 2012, 06:56:03 AM by Severian »
|
Logged
|
Taking a temporary hiatus from posting. PM me if you wish to contact me as I will still be signing in on occasion. Please forgive me if my posts have lacked humility, charity, or tact.
NOTE: Some of my older posts (particularly those prior to late 2012) may not reflect my current views.
|
|
|
|
orthonorm
|
|
« Reply #14 on: November 18, 2012, 06:59:03 AM » |
|
Is the classic Christmas hymn a Christological heresy because of the following line, "Veiled in flesh the Godhead see,"? This line--'VEILED in flesh'--seems to undermine the Divinity of Jesus' human nature. It makes it appear as if God only wore human flesh/looked like a human, but that He wasn't truly human. What's the name of this heresy again?
It is not necessarily heretical, but one could misconstrue it as Doceticism if they really wanted to. "[Christ] who, being in the form of God, did not consider it robbery to be equal with God, but made Himself of no reputation, taking the form of a bondservant, and coming in the likeness of men. And being found in appearance as a man, He humbled Himself and became obedient to the point of death, even the death of the cross." -Phillipians 2:6-8 Here, St. Paul says that Christ appeared as a man, but it is quite clear in context what he means by "appeared." Appearance only gets a bad rap if you let the bigotries of Greeks bother you. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Ignorance is not a lack, but a passion.
|
|
|
|
orthonorm
|
|
« Reply #15 on: November 18, 2012, 06:59:29 AM » |
|
On a slightly different note:
Is it OK for an Orthodox Christian to listen and sing western Christmas carols?
Tell me you are joking? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Ignorance is not a lack, but a passion.
|
|
|
|
Severian
|
|
« Reply #16 on: November 18, 2012, 07:00:32 AM » |
|
On a slightly different note:
Is it OK for an Orthodox Christian to listen and sing western Christmas carols?
Tell me you are joking? Is your face joking? |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: November 18, 2012, 07:02:21 AM by Severian »
|
Logged
|
Taking a temporary hiatus from posting. PM me if you wish to contact me as I will still be signing in on occasion. Please forgive me if my posts have lacked humility, charity, or tact.
NOTE: Some of my older posts (particularly those prior to late 2012) may not reflect my current views.
|
|
|
|
LBK
|
|
« Reply #17 on: November 18, 2012, 07:10:57 AM » |
|
On a slightly different note:
Is it OK for an Orthodox Christian to listen and sing western Christmas carols?
A good number of traditional western Christmas carols, especially those which pre-date the Reformation, are completely compatible with Orthodox teaching. O Come All Ye Faithful and Hark the Herald Angels Sing are good examples. They shouldn't be sung during Orthodox services as a liturgical replacement for hymns appointed for those services, but, otherwise, if there's no heresy or distortion in a carol, why not enjoy them?  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Severian
|
|
« Reply #18 on: November 18, 2012, 07:12:29 AM » |
|
On a slightly different note:
Is it OK for an Orthodox Christian to listen and sing western Christmas carols?
A good number of traditional western Christmas carols, especially those which pre-date the Reformation, are completely compatible with Orthodox teaching. O Come All Ye Faithful and Hark the Herald Angels Sing are good examples. They shouldn't be sung during Orthodox services as a liturgical replacement for hymns appointed for those services, but, otherwise, if there's no heresy or distortion in a carol, why not enjoy them? Thank you for your input, LBK. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Taking a temporary hiatus from posting. PM me if you wish to contact me as I will still be signing in on occasion. Please forgive me if my posts have lacked humility, charity, or tact.
NOTE: Some of my older posts (particularly those prior to late 2012) may not reflect my current views.
|
|
|
|
Cyrillic
|
|
« Reply #19 on: November 18, 2012, 07:23:34 AM » |
|
Ah yes, the old heresy of being written by Western Christians, a particularly pernicious heresy prevalent since the time of Augustine, the first Western Christian who dared to write extensively.
Don't you forget that blasted Tertullian, him writing in Latin and living in the west is even worse than him becoming a montanist! |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: November 18, 2012, 07:23:43 AM by Cyrillic »
|
Logged
|
On a temporary/semi-permanent/permanent vacation from OC.net.
|
|
|
FormerReformer
Convertodox of the convertodox
Site Supporter
Archon
Offline
Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: I'll take (e) for "all of the above"
Posts: 2,402
|
|
« Reply #20 on: November 18, 2012, 01:42:10 PM » |
|
Ah yes, the old heresy of being written by Western Christians, a particularly pernicious heresy prevalent since the time of Augustine, the first Western Christian who dared to write extensively.
Don't you forget that blasted Tertullian, him writing in Latin and living in the west is even worse than him becoming a montanist! Tertullian lived in Montana? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Funny," said Lancelot, "how the people who can't pray say that prayers are not answered, however much the people who can pray say they are." TH White Oh, no: I've succumbed to Hyperdoxy! |
|
|
|
Cyrillic
|
|
« Reply #21 on: November 18, 2012, 01:46:47 PM » |
|
Ah yes, the old heresy of being written by Western Christians, a particularly pernicious heresy prevalent since the time of Augustine, the first Western Christian who dared to write extensively.
Don't you forget that blasted Tertullian, him writing in Latin and living in the west is even worse than him becoming a montanist! Tertullian lived in Montana? Yes, terrible huh? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
On a temporary/semi-permanent/permanent vacation from OC.net.
|
|
|
FormerReformer
Convertodox of the convertodox
Site Supporter
Archon
Offline
Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: I'll take (e) for "all of the above"
Posts: 2,402
|
|
« Reply #22 on: November 18, 2012, 01:47:38 PM » |
|
Ah yes, the old heresy of being written by Western Christians, a particularly pernicious heresy prevalent since the time of Augustine, the first Western Christian who dared to write extensively.
Don't you forget that blasted Tertullian, him writing in Latin and living in the west is even worse than him becoming a montanist! Tertullian lived in Montana? Yes, terrible huh? It explains quite a bit. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Funny," said Lancelot, "how the people who can't pray say that prayers are not answered, however much the people who can pray say they are." TH White Oh, no: I've succumbed to Hyperdoxy! |
|
|
|
Justin Kissel
|
|
« Reply #23 on: November 18, 2012, 01:58:14 PM » |
|
JamesR Please see Heb. 10  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
NicholasMyra
|
|
« Reply #24 on: November 18, 2012, 03:51:08 PM » |
|
Is the classic Christmas hymn a Christological heresy because of the following line, "Veiled in flesh the Godhead see,"? This line--'VEILED in flesh'--seems to undermine the Divinity of Jesus' human nature. It makes it appear as if God only wore human flesh/looked like a human...
"You clothed me with skin and flesh, and knit me together with bones and sinews..." -Job 10 So to be clothed with flesh means to have flesh. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: November 18, 2012, 03:51:21 PM by NicholasMyra »
|
Logged
|
if Christ does and says x. And someone else does and says not x and you are ever in doubt, follow Christ.
"Simply put, if you’re not willing to take what is dearest to you, whether plans or people, and kiss it goodbye, you can’t be my disciple." |
|
|
|
genesisone
|
|
« Reply #25 on: November 18, 2012, 04:01:10 PM » |
|
Is the classic Christmas hymn a Christological heresy because of the following line, "Veiled in flesh the Godhead see,"? This line--'VEILED in flesh'--seems to undermine the Divinity of Jesus' human nature. It makes it appear as if God only wore human flesh/looked like a human, but that He wasn't truly human. What's the name of this heresy again?
This hymn was written by Charles Wesley, brother of John Wesley, founder of the Methodist movement. I have never heard anyone question their understanding of the Incarnation. I think you're taking a single word out of context here and making too much of it. It's a bit poetic, that's all. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Fr.Aidan
|
|
« Reply #26 on: November 18, 2012, 06:03:38 PM » |
|
The only problematic Christmas carol I can think of is that one that identifies the star of Bethlehem, which tradition says was an appearance of the Christ Child in the heavens (in other words, it looked like a baby) with a comet, of all things. It has those lines, "Do you see what I see? A star, a star dancing in the night with a tail as big as a kite, with a tail as big as a kite."
While not heretical, it is clearly contrary to Orthodox Tradition. The song came out about a month before I was born.
I don't see any heresy in "veiled in flesh the Godhead see," but I think that if a person looks under every rock for heresy, they are probably distracted from their divine calling.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: November 18, 2012, 06:06:36 PM by Fr.Aidan »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
genesisone
|
|
« Reply #27 on: November 18, 2012, 06:35:28 PM » |
|
The only problematic Christmas carol I can think of is that one that identifies the star of Bethlehem, which tradition says was an appearance of the Christ Child in the heavens (in other words, it looked like a baby) with a comet, of all things. It has those lines, "Do you see what I see? A star, a star dancing in the night with a tail as big as a kite, with a tail as big as a kite."
While not heretical, it is clearly contrary to Orthodox Tradition. The song came out about a month before I was born.
I don't see any heresy in "veiled in flesh the Godhead see," but I think that if a person looks under every rock for heresy, they are probably distracted from their divine calling.
Father, I haven't come across that tradition before. How is it referenced in hymnography or perhaps the Infancy Gospels? (Not disputing you, please understand - just curious.) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Fr.Aidan
|
|
« Reply #28 on: November 18, 2012, 07:10:37 PM » |
|
I am pretty sure St. John Chrysostom mentions it, and the Prologue From Ochrid based on earlier sources, of course. I don't have a detailed answer, unfortunately. Help!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Sinful Hypocrite
Everyday I am critical of others. Every day I make similar mistakes. Every day I am a hypocrite.
OC.net guru
Offline
Faith: Greek Orthodox
Jurisdiction: "The Orthodox Church" by Bishop Kallistos Ware: "We know where the Church is but we cannot be sure where it is not; and so we must refrain from passing judgment on non-Orthodox Christians."
Posts: 1,595
Great googly moogly!
|
|
« Reply #29 on: November 18, 2012, 09:30:25 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: November 18, 2012, 09:33:18 PM by Sinful Hypocrite »
|
Logged
|
The Lord gathers his sheep, I fear I am a goat. Lord have mercy.
"A Christian is someone who follows and worships a perfectly good God who revealed his true face through the life, death and resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth.“
|
|
|
|
LBK
|
|
« Reply #30 on: November 18, 2012, 10:03:26 PM » |
|
The only problematic Christmas carol I can think of is that one that identifies the star of Bethlehem, which tradition says was an appearance of the Christ Child in the heavens (in other words, it looked like a baby) with a comet, of all things. It has those lines, "Do you see what I see? A star, a star dancing in the night with a tail as big as a kite, with a tail as big as a kite."
While not heretical, it is clearly contrary to Orthodox Tradition. The song came out about a month before I was born.
I don't see any heresy in "veiled in flesh the Godhead see," but I think that if a person looks under every rock for heresy, they are probably distracted from their divine calling.
Father, I haven't come across that tradition before. How is it referenced in hymnography or perhaps the Infancy Gospels? (Not disputing you, please understand - just curious.) There is nothing at all in the Nativity and pre-Nativity hymnography which describes the star which led the Magi to Bethlehem as looking like a child or babe. Any such imagery, even if written of by a saint, can only be regarded as speculation, or, perhaps, a mistranslation from the original language, or a misunderstanding of what the saint actually wrote. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: November 18, 2012, 10:05:07 PM by LBK »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
yeshuaisiam
|
|
« Reply #31 on: November 18, 2012, 10:51:08 PM » |
|
Do you mean "Herald Angels"? I think the heresy you are thinking of is docetism, which taught that Christ only seemed to be human; I believe certain forms of Gnosticism taught this also.
Although the line you quote could be taken that way if considered in isolation, I think that if you consider the following lines along with it, you get a different impression. In the version I learned, after "Veiled in flesh the Godhead see" comes:
"Hail the incarnate deity,
Pleased as man with men to dwell,
Jesus our Immanuel."
There is a clear indication that Jesus is God "incarnate", and that He is a man. So, whatever one may think of Christmas carols, or western hymns in general, I think we can absolve this particular carol of the docetist heresy. You have to admire his persistence . . . James gives good internetz. You are not kidding. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
yeshuaisiam
|
|
« Reply #32 on: November 18, 2012, 10:56:32 PM » |
|
The only problematic Christmas carol I can think of is that one that identifies the star of Bethlehem, which tradition says was an appearance of the Christ Child in the heavens (in other words, it looked like a baby) with a comet, of all things. It has those lines, "Do you see what I see? A star, a star dancing in the night with a tail as big as a kite, with a tail as big as a kite."
While not heretical, it is clearly contrary to Orthodox Tradition. The song came out about a month before I was born.
I don't see any heresy in "veiled in flesh the Godhead see," but I think that if a person looks under every rock for heresy, they are probably distracted from their divine calling.
You bring up a good point. I honestly never thought of that. Replacing a comet with a star.... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
