OrthodoxChristianity.net
October 22, 2014, 10:55:00 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Reminder: No political discussions in the public fora.  If you do not have access to the private Politics Forum, please send a PM to Fr. George.
 
   Home   Help Calendar Contact Treasury Tags Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 »   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Schlock Icons  (Read 75209 times) Average Rating: 0
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Agabus
The user formerly known as Agabus.
Archon
********
Online Online

Faith: Pan-American Colloquial Convert Hybrid Orthodoxy.
Jurisdiction: We are all uncanonical now.
Posts: 2,361



« Reply #1125 on: October 24, 2013, 12:24:52 PM »

Many religious bloggers (and forumers) seem to have this weird idea that they are fighting for truth and righteousness by flaming people for what they see as incorrect beliefs.

It's not weird.  They are fighting for truth and righteousness.  They are fighting...for the LORD. 
If they were really fighting for G-d, they would never use the all-caps LORD, they would use HaShem.
Logged

Blessed Nazarius practiced the ascetic life. His clothes were tattered. He wore his shoes without removing them for six years.

THE OPINIONS HERE MAY NOT REFLECT THE ACTUAL OR PERCEIVED ORTHODOX CHURCH
Agabus
The user formerly known as Agabus.
Archon
********
Online Online

Faith: Pan-American Colloquial Convert Hybrid Orthodoxy.
Jurisdiction: We are all uncanonical now.
Posts: 2,361



« Reply #1126 on: October 24, 2013, 12:28:21 PM »

From here:

Logged

Blessed Nazarius practiced the ascetic life. His clothes were tattered. He wore his shoes without removing them for six years.

THE OPINIONS HERE MAY NOT REFLECT THE ACTUAL OR PERCEIVED ORTHODOX CHURCH
Hawkeye
Onomatodoxicologist
High Elder
******
Offline Offline

Faith: I don't mean to brag but...
Jurisdiction: I've been in an Antiochian church.
Posts: 627


My grandfather's uncle, Boris Half-Ear


« Reply #1127 on: October 24, 2013, 12:36:42 PM »

I wouldn't be bothered so much if the "re-imagining" didn't look so terrible. It's got nothing on the Pantokrator.

Funny that the sign of the cross was kept.
Logged

Eastern Mind
Hi! I'm Olaf and I like warm hugs!
High Elder
******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Hopeful
Jurisdiction: Greece
Posts: 713



« Reply #1128 on: October 24, 2013, 01:35:20 PM »

From here:



UGH. That's ghastly.  Angry The Sinai Pantocrator was perfect just the way it was.
« Last Edit: October 24, 2013, 01:35:44 PM by Eastern Mind » Logged

"ALL THE GODS OF THE HINDUS ARE DEMONS HAHAHAHAHA!!"
mike
Stratopedarches
**************
Offline Offline

Posts: 21,467


WWW
« Reply #1129 on: October 24, 2013, 02:10:31 PM »

The Sinai Pantocrator was perfect just the way it was.

Actually I prefer something a bit less realistic.
Logged

Byzantinism
no longer posting here
The_Convert
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: OCA - Romanian Episcopate
Posts: 30


« Reply #1130 on: October 24, 2013, 03:15:16 PM »

Is that second Greek word (Internetakias) an actual word? Does anyone have an idea what that could mean?


Logged

"If you will, you can become all flame"
mike
Stratopedarches
**************
Offline Offline

Posts: 21,467


WWW
« Reply #1131 on: October 24, 2013, 03:24:45 PM »

Nerd?
Logged

Byzantinism
no longer posting here
orthonorm
Warned
Hoplitarches
*************
Offline Offline

Faith: Sola Gratia
Jurisdiction: Outside
Posts: 16,523



« Reply #1132 on: October 24, 2013, 03:27:01 PM »

Nerd?

werd!
Logged

Ignorance is not a lack, but a passion.
LBK
Toumarches
************
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Posts: 11,155


Holy Father Patrick, pray for us!


« Reply #1133 on: October 24, 2013, 06:42:45 PM »

Is that second Greek word (Internetakias) an actual word? Does anyone have an idea what that could mean?



Internekakias could be roughly translated as "prolific internet user" or "netgeek". It's very likely become part of present-day Greek slang.
Logged
Agabus
The user formerly known as Agabus.
Archon
********
Online Online

Faith: Pan-American Colloquial Convert Hybrid Orthodoxy.
Jurisdiction: We are all uncanonical now.
Posts: 2,361



« Reply #1134 on: October 25, 2013, 10:07:44 AM »

Christ the prisoner.

Logged

Blessed Nazarius practiced the ascetic life. His clothes were tattered. He wore his shoes without removing them for six years.

THE OPINIONS HERE MAY NOT REFLECT THE ACTUAL OR PERCEIVED ORTHODOX CHURCH
LBK
Toumarches
************
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Posts: 11,155


Holy Father Patrick, pray for us!


« Reply #1135 on: October 25, 2013, 10:47:36 AM »

Christ the prisoner.



Little different to this piece, Christ of Columbine, attempting to shoehorn Christ into a specific time and place to suit and serve a particular cause. Standard MO for artists like Robert Lentz and their protegees:



The artist's spiel:

Following the murders of the children at Columbine High School in Colorado, I began to imagine creating an icon of a teenaged Christ. It seems the world these kids have inherited is increasingly impossible for them to bear. With the massive numbers of deaths in September 2001, we all feel the stalking presence of evil. .....

...... However, the deliberate murder of innocent people In Manhattan or Afghanistan is evil. How to respond to this conflicting vision of death? Bringing the icon of the teenage Christ into the world gave me an opportunity.

I painted the frame in black and white and brought a Taos teenager, as Christ, into the ominous landscape, dressing him in traditional colors worn by Christ in his adult icons; blue (divinity) over red (humanity). Christ is the only color in the icon, he is the light and the life in the midst of death.

« Last Edit: October 25, 2013, 10:47:57 AM by LBK » Logged
orthonorm
Warned
Hoplitarches
*************
Offline Offline

Faith: Sola Gratia
Jurisdiction: Outside
Posts: 16,523



« Reply #1136 on: October 25, 2013, 10:49:39 AM »

Christ the prisoner.



I asked LBK among others about this icon sometime ago and got nothing in return from her.

So much for her complaints about people not taking her storied expertise seriously.
Logged

Ignorance is not a lack, but a passion.
orthonorm
Warned
Hoplitarches
*************
Offline Offline

Faith: Sola Gratia
Jurisdiction: Outside
Posts: 16,523



« Reply #1137 on: October 25, 2013, 10:50:18 AM »

Christ the prisoner.



Little different to this piece, Christ of Columbine, attempting to shoehorn Christ into a specific time and place to suit and serve a particular cause. Standard MO for artists like Robert Lentz and their protegees:



Wanna bet?
Logged

Ignorance is not a lack, but a passion.
LBK
Toumarches
************
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Posts: 11,155


Holy Father Patrick, pray for us!


« Reply #1138 on: October 25, 2013, 10:52:09 AM »

Christ the prisoner.



I asked LBK among others about this icon sometime ago and got nothing in return from her.


You're getting something from me now, aren't you?

Quote
So much for her complaints about people not taking her storied expertise seriously.

Of whom you're the foremost.  Tongue
Logged
LBK
Toumarches
************
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Posts: 11,155


Holy Father Patrick, pray for us!


« Reply #1139 on: October 25, 2013, 10:52:34 AM »

Christ the prisoner.



Little different to this piece, Christ of Columbine, attempting to shoehorn Christ into a specific time and place to suit and serve a particular cause. Standard MO for artists like Robert Lentz and their protegees:



Wanna bet?

Please elaborate.
Logged
orthonorm
Warned
Hoplitarches
*************
Offline Offline

Faith: Sola Gratia
Jurisdiction: Outside
Posts: 16,523



« Reply #1140 on: October 25, 2013, 10:54:21 AM »

Christ the prisoner.



I asked LBK among others about this icon sometime ago and got nothing in return from her.


You're getting something from me now, aren't you?

Quote
So much for her complaints about people not taking her storied expertise seriously.

Of whom you're the foremost.  Tongue

There was a moment of some serious discussion about this icon that you could've influenced. This was before I realized exactly how idiosyncratic and without much theoretical weight you judged things. It was sensitive and serious inquiry for help.

And the response was:

Quote
Logged

Ignorance is not a lack, but a passion.
LBK
Toumarches
************
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Posts: 11,155


Holy Father Patrick, pray for us!


« Reply #1141 on: October 25, 2013, 11:01:05 AM »

Christ the prisoner.



I asked LBK among others about this icon sometime ago and got nothing in return from her.


You're getting something from me now, aren't you?

Quote
So much for her complaints about people not taking her storied expertise seriously.

Of whom you're the foremost.  Tongue

There was a moment of some serious discussion about this icon that you could've influenced.

And the response was:

Quote

I could have influenced? Sorry, not buying it, not when, even at that time, you rarely missed opportunities to denigrate what I posted on iconography, and none of it constructive or cogent.

Quote
This was before I realized exactly how idiosyncratic and without much theoretical weight you judged things. It was sensitive and serious inquiry for help.

What I write on iconography is underpinned by the historical, liturgical, scriptural and patristic traditions of the Church. No idiosyncrasy or frivolous thought involved.

Logged
orthonorm
Warned
Hoplitarches
*************
Offline Offline

Faith: Sola Gratia
Jurisdiction: Outside
Posts: 16,523



« Reply #1142 on: October 25, 2013, 11:23:08 AM »

Christ the prisoner.



I asked LBK among others about this icon sometime ago and got nothing in return from her.


You're getting something from me now, aren't you?

Quote
So much for her complaints about people not taking her storied expertise seriously.

Of whom you're the foremost.  Tongue

There was a moment of some serious discussion about this icon that you could've influenced.

And the response was:

Quote

I could have influenced? Sorry, not buying it, not when, even at that time, you rarely missed opportunities to denigrate what I posted on iconography, and none of it constructive or cogent.

Quote
This was before I realized exactly how idiosyncratic and without much theoretical weight you judged things. It was sensitive and serious inquiry for help.

What I write on iconography is underpinned by the historical, liturgical, scriptural and patristic traditions of the Church. No idiosyncrasy or frivolous thought involved.

Think or buy whatever you want. I would gladly forward the messages I sent others about decisions I was trying to make pending your contributions. You agreed to help me. The pain still haunts me.

I know where your strengths lie and where they do not and know how to make use of and appreciate them. You though haven't learned the limits of your expertise. We've been here before and when asked a direct question you dissemble and like most try to steer the conversation toward your own strengths (something like iconographic curation) which are necessary and helpful.

However you believe the curator can answer everything about a collection of objects rather than offering a list of them and a history of how that list came to be within a historigraphical horizon.

But yes, you could've used your prodigious talent to affect a real moment in more than a few persons lives rather than posting screeds on oc.net. You can choose to deny that fact, but I promise it is the truth.



« Last Edit: October 25, 2013, 11:24:20 AM by orthonorm » Logged

Ignorance is not a lack, but a passion.
orthonorm
Warned
Hoplitarches
*************
Offline Offline

Faith: Sola Gratia
Jurisdiction: Outside
Posts: 16,523



« Reply #1143 on: October 25, 2013, 11:26:09 AM »

Christ the prisoner.



I asked LBK among others about this icon sometime ago and got nothing in return from her.


You're getting something from me now, aren't you?

Quote
So much for her complaints about people not taking her storied expertise seriously.

Of whom you're the foremost.  Tongue

There was a moment of some serious discussion about this icon that you could've influenced.

And the response was:

Quote

I could have influenced? Sorry, not buying it, not when, even at that time, you rarely missed opportunities to denigrate what I posted on iconography, and none of it constructive or cogent.

Quote
This was before I realized exactly how idiosyncratic and without much theoretical weight you judged things. It was sensitive and serious inquiry for help.

What I write on iconography is underpinned by the historical, liturgical, scriptural and patristic traditions of the Church. No idiosyncrasy or frivolous thought involved.

Think or buy whatever you want. I would gladly forward the messages I sent others about decisions I was trying to make pending your contributions. You agreed to help me. The pain still haunts me.

I know where your strengths lie and where they do not and know how to make use of and appreciate them. You though haven't learned the limits of your expertise. We've been here before and when asked a direct question you dissemble and like most try to steer the conversation toward your own strengths (something like iconographic curation) which are necessary and helpful.

However you believe the curator can answer everything about a collection of objects rather than offering a list of them and a history of how that list came to be within a historigraphical horizon.

But yes, you could've used your prodigious talent to affect a real moment in more than a few persons lives rather than posting screeds on oc.net. You can choose to deny that fact, but I promise it is the truth.





But it is water under the bridge so speak now, my bringing it up is to illustrate if you had engaged in the question that was posed to you, you would not level both of the examples above to the same thing. But who cares about nuance?
Logged

Ignorance is not a lack, but a passion.
orthonorm
Warned
Hoplitarches
*************
Offline Offline

Faith: Sola Gratia
Jurisdiction: Outside
Posts: 16,523



« Reply #1144 on: October 25, 2013, 11:29:41 AM »

Christ the prisoner.



Little different to this piece, Christ of Columbine, attempting to shoehorn Christ into a specific time and place to suit and serve a particular cause. Standard MO for artists like Robert Lentz and their protegees:



Wanna bet?

Please elaborate.

Let's talk stakes.
Logged

Ignorance is not a lack, but a passion.
LBK
Toumarches
************
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Posts: 11,155


Holy Father Patrick, pray for us!


« Reply #1145 on: October 25, 2013, 11:33:51 AM »

Quote

But it is water under the bridge so speak now, my bringing it up is to illustrate if you had engaged in the question that was posed to you, you would not level both of the examples above to the same thing. But who cares about nuance?

I would have indeed put both images on the same level, even if the "prisoner" image had been so painted in honest ignorance (the "Columbine" one was certainly not painted in ignorance). Icons are not subservient to causes, no matter how noble or worthy such causes may be, neither should they be vehicles for an artist's or patron's self-expression. I have railed against various such images, on various threads, and have given clear and cogent reasons for my position.
Logged
LBK
Toumarches
************
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Posts: 11,155


Holy Father Patrick, pray for us!


« Reply #1146 on: October 25, 2013, 11:35:04 AM »


Let's talk stakes.

I don't do cryptic. You're perfectly capable of expressing yourself in clear, standard English.
Logged
orthonorm
Warned
Hoplitarches
*************
Offline Offline

Faith: Sola Gratia
Jurisdiction: Outside
Posts: 16,523



« Reply #1147 on: October 25, 2013, 11:38:00 AM »


Let's talk stakes.

I don't do cryptic. You're perfectly capable of expressing yourself in clear, standard English.

That is English.

Oh . . . I see the back pedaling in your statement already. So it is not the same. OK.

Since you don't understand the word:

Quote
That which is laid down as a wager; that which is staked or hazarded; a pledge.

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/stake

But hey, you are already backpedaling . . .
« Last Edit: October 25, 2013, 11:38:20 AM by orthonorm » Logged

Ignorance is not a lack, but a passion.
orthonorm
Warned
Hoplitarches
*************
Offline Offline

Faith: Sola Gratia
Jurisdiction: Outside
Posts: 16,523



« Reply #1148 on: October 25, 2013, 11:39:47 AM »

Frankly, I was thinking about $1k or so that I could show that indeed there is a difference between the two entries above.

I was going to then suggest we select three judges.

But you are already crying uncle and moving into your pet apologies.
Logged

Ignorance is not a lack, but a passion.
LBK
Toumarches
************
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Posts: 11,155


Holy Father Patrick, pray for us!


« Reply #1149 on: October 25, 2013, 11:40:47 AM »


Let's talk stakes.

I don't do cryptic. You're perfectly capable of expressing yourself in clear, standard English.

That is English.

Oh . . . I see the back pedaling in your statement already. So it is not the same. OK.

Since you don't understand the word:

Quote
That which is laid down as a wager; that which is staked or hazarded; a pledge.

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/stake

But hey, you are already backpedaling . . .

You speak of bets and stakes - just come clean, already! This cryptic shtick is getting old.

EDIT: Just saw your latest post.

1. I'm not a gambler, and the thought of betting on the comparison of two "icons" is simply ridiculous.

2. What apologies?
« Last Edit: October 25, 2013, 11:44:05 AM by LBK » Logged
TheTrisagion
Armed Feline rider of Flaming Unicorns
Warned
Merarches
***********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Antiochian
Posts: 8,713



« Reply #1150 on: October 25, 2013, 11:41:14 AM »

Frankly, I was thinking about $1k or so that I could show that indeed there is a difference between the two entries above.

I was going to then suggest we select three judges.

But you are already crying uncle and moving into your pet apologies.
I think it would be best if I set the stakes.  If orthonorm wins, LBK pays me $1k.  If LBK wins, orthonorm pays me $1k.  I think that will satisfy all relevant parties (i.e. me)
Logged

Have you considered the possibility that your face is an ad hominem?
Somebody just went all Jack Chick up in here.
orthonorm
Warned
Hoplitarches
*************
Offline Offline

Faith: Sola Gratia
Jurisdiction: Outside
Posts: 16,523



« Reply #1151 on: October 25, 2013, 11:42:52 AM »


Let's talk stakes.

I don't do cryptic. You're perfectly capable of expressing yourself in clear, standard English.

That is English.

Oh . . . I see the back pedaling in your statement already. So it is not the same. OK.

Since you don't understand the word:

Quote
That which is laid down as a wager; that which is staked or hazarded; a pledge.

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/stake

But hey, you are already backpedaling . . .

You speak of bets and stakes - just come clean, already! This cryptic shtick is getting old.

What is cryptic about suggesting a bet? Have you have made a friendly wager? There is a back and forth, setting of terms, etc.

And see above. If you weren't so hasty in posting I already suggested a wager.

But you are already folding and making my case, which is OK. Cause sometimes being right is better than being a little more financially solvent.
Logged

Ignorance is not a lack, but a passion.
orthonorm
Warned
Hoplitarches
*************
Offline Offline

Faith: Sola Gratia
Jurisdiction: Outside
Posts: 16,523



« Reply #1152 on: October 25, 2013, 11:44:26 AM »

Frankly, I was thinking about $1k or so that I could show that indeed there is a difference between the two entries above.

I was going to then suggest we select three judges.

But you are already crying uncle and moving into your pet apologies.
I think it would be best if I set the stakes.  If orthonorm wins, LBK pays me $1k.  If LBK wins, orthonorm pays me $1k.  I think that will satisfy all relevant parties (i.e. me)

Hey, I am OK with a vig. But the debate like usual is a moving target with LBK.
Logged

Ignorance is not a lack, but a passion.
LBK
Toumarches
************
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Posts: 11,155


Holy Father Patrick, pray for us!


« Reply #1153 on: October 25, 2013, 11:44:57 AM »

I edited my previous post.
Logged
orthonorm
Warned
Hoplitarches
*************
Offline Offline

Faith: Sola Gratia
Jurisdiction: Outside
Posts: 16,523



« Reply #1154 on: October 25, 2013, 11:45:54 AM »

And really, calling me cryptic here is really lazy. It just makes no sense here. I bet even J Michael would understand the posts.

LBK has already admitted her initial comments were less than circumspect and that is fine by me.
Logged

Ignorance is not a lack, but a passion.
orthonorm
Warned
Hoplitarches
*************
Offline Offline

Faith: Sola Gratia
Jurisdiction: Outside
Posts: 16,523



« Reply #1155 on: October 25, 2013, 11:47:58 AM »


Let's talk stakes.

I don't do cryptic. You're perfectly capable of expressing yourself in clear, standard English.

That is English.

Oh . . . I see the back pedaling in your statement already. So it is not the same. OK.

Since you don't understand the word:

Quote
That which is laid down as a wager; that which is staked or hazarded; a pledge.

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/stake

But hey, you are already backpedaling . . .

You speak of bets and stakes - just come clean, already! This cryptic shtick is getting old.

EDIT: Just saw your latest post.

1. I'm not a gambler, and the thought of betting on the comparison of two "icons" is simply ridiculous.

2. What apologies?

People's words are worth well what they are worth.

And they are not icons, so who cares? And we wouldn't be gambling on them but rather your incredibly reductive treatment of them and Robert Lenz tossed in for whatever reason.

But again, this is settled well enough.

I am playing the slow roll here. So I figure it a win.
Logged

Ignorance is not a lack, but a passion.
LBK
Toumarches
************
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Posts: 11,155


Holy Father Patrick, pray for us!


« Reply #1156 on: October 25, 2013, 11:48:29 AM »

And really, calling me cryptic here is really lazy. It just makes no sense here. I bet even J Michael would understand the posts.

LBK has already admitted her initial comments were less than circumspect and that is fine by me.

Where have I done so?  Huh
Logged
LBK
Toumarches
************
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Posts: 11,155


Holy Father Patrick, pray for us!


« Reply #1157 on: October 25, 2013, 11:49:16 AM »

Quote
But you are already folding and making my case, which is OK. Cause sometimes being right is better than being a little more financially solvent.

You're just sore that you didn't get what you wanted way back when. Sorry, I stand by what I write, and I'm certainly not stooping to silly games to satisfy your strange whims and fancies.
   
Logged
orthonorm
Warned
Hoplitarches
*************
Offline Offline

Faith: Sola Gratia
Jurisdiction: Outside
Posts: 16,523



« Reply #1158 on: October 25, 2013, 12:47:08 PM »

Quote
But you are already folding and making my case, which is OK. Cause sometimes being right is better than being a little more financially solvent.

You're just sore that you didn't get what you wanted way back when. Sorry, I stand by what I write, and I'm certainly not stooping to silly games to satisfy your strange whims and fancies.
   

No to you your: no one ever listens to me, I offer a counter example. There was a sensitive moment and I am not complaining that I didn't get what I wanted but rather that you didn't offer what you said you would. Then year(s) later you opine quite vaguely and broadly and inaccurately (as you have already admitted) later on the matter.

Your favorite whipping boy, Bob, has nothing to do with the person who made the image you equated to his work. Not in intent, which I normally don't care about, but a reverse image search by certain people could cause harm to them by your brazen comparison.

You could have offered a more nuanced contribution to the number of opinions I sought about the "Prisoner Jesus" image which could have helped me form a more thorough and sensitive argument against its use. I had my gut reactions at the time and turned directly to you for technical reasons to suggest it not being used as an icon. Others offered their opinions based on their own abilities. Your own mastery of the history of the iconographic tradition was what I was hoping to be able to benefit from.

Again think what you want, but I suggest in the future you follow up on your agreements made in private rather than glibly making comments which could be hurtful in the future to specific persons who don't come here and open themselves up to the slings and arrows of oc.net.

Perhaps Bob deserves your ire, the person responsible for the other image doesn't nor his well meaning supporters even if it only via extension by comparison to of the creator of that image to Bob. That I do know. Hence my rare occasion of asking about 20 oc.net members via PM something rather creating a thread. (That was when I realized there a was a limit to the amount of persons you could PM at once.)

Oh well. I know this doesn't fit whatever characterizations you have made about me and my esteem of your expertise, but I guess when you ignore the obvious counterfactuals you can enjoy the idol you have created in my image.

Logged

Ignorance is not a lack, but a passion.
orthonorm
Warned
Hoplitarches
*************
Offline Offline

Faith: Sola Gratia
Jurisdiction: Outside
Posts: 16,523



« Reply #1159 on: October 25, 2013, 01:01:43 PM »

Now I am finished on this segment of this thread, lest the mods worry about a back and forth derailing the OnT.
Logged

Ignorance is not a lack, but a passion.
Nephi
Monster Tamer
Section Moderator
Protokentarchos
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Non-Chalcedonian Byzantine
Jurisdiction: Greek Orthodox Church of Antioch
Posts: 4,607



« Reply #1160 on: October 25, 2013, 01:39:51 PM »

Christ the prisoner.



Quote
About the 'Christ in Prison' icon:  It came to pass because some of us who were going to the prison each week commented that it was true that we meet Christ when we visit His brethren.  I had been talking to Fr. Ted in Dayton about his prison ministry, and he told me that one of his guys wrote icons.  I got in contact with the inmate, and he did this icon for us.  It is a very traditional image, except that Christ is wearing an Ohio prison uniform.  The icon was a blessing to several of us at the OCPM gathering in Denver, and the original went home with a man whose son is in prison.

From here.

I think it's also influenced by Matthew 25:36, "I was naked and you clothed me, I was sick and you visited me, I was in prison and you came to me."

FWIW.
Logged
hecma925
Non-clairvoyant
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: OCA - Diocese of the South
Posts: 6,337


Pray for me, a sinner.


WWW
« Reply #1161 on: October 25, 2013, 02:42:08 PM »

This one looks fine.  No Ohio state prisoner garb.

Logged

J Michael
Older than dirt; dumber than a box of rocks; colossally ignorant; a little crazy ;-)
Merarches
***********
Offline Offline

Faith: Byzantine Catholic
Posts: 10,172


Lord, have mercy! I live under a rock. Alleluia!


« Reply #1162 on: October 25, 2013, 03:07:57 PM »

And really, calling me cryptic here is really lazy.

Is there a better place to call you cryptic?

I bet even J Michael would understand the posts.
I struggled mightily for hour after hour, ruminating over each and every word of each post, dictionary and thesaurus at my side, and yet....and yet....well, maybe a little, anyway.  Grin Kiss

On a slightly more serious note, LBK is totally on target by saying to you, "You're perfectly capable of expressing yourself in clear, standard English."  What is sad is that you don't do so far more often, for when you do what you write is frequently not only interesting but also can be quite illuminating.  Yes, you do a cryptic shtick.  It only serves to alienate.  But perhaps that is your intention?


« Last Edit: October 25, 2013, 03:08:42 PM by J Michael » Logged

"May Thy Cross, O Lord, in which I seek refuge, be for me a bridge across the great river of fire.  May I pass along it to the habitation of life." ~St. Ephraim the Syrian

"Sometimes you're the windshield.  Sometimes you're the bug." ~ Mark Knopfler (?)
orthonorm
Warned
Hoplitarches
*************
Offline Offline

Faith: Sola Gratia
Jurisdiction: Outside
Posts: 16,523



« Reply #1163 on: October 25, 2013, 05:23:19 PM »

And really, calling me cryptic here is really lazy.

Is there a better place to call you cryptic?

I bet even J Michael would understand the posts.
I struggled mightily for hour after hour, ruminating over each and every word of each post, dictionary and thesaurus at my side, and yet....and yet....well, maybe a little, anyway.  Grin Kiss

On a slightly more serious note, LBK is totally on target by saying to you, "You're perfectly capable of expressing yourself in clear, standard English."  What is sad is that you don't do so far more often, for when you do what you write is frequently not only interesting but also can be quite illuminating.  Yes, you do a cryptic shtick.  It only serves to alienate.  But perhaps that is your intention?




Sorry J Michal, that post was not fodder for your past grievances, but to point out that nothing cryptic was said here to anyone remotely familiar with English or its use in wagering on an argument. LBK was just appealing to whatever the mass has decided it an appropriate way to dismiss me, just as Bob is a lazy short cut to dismiss the image she equated with his work.

Furthermore, am I never cryptic. Some people understand me, fine. And well, those who have eyes will read and those who do not will not.

If you want to make posts about my posts, feel free to start an entire thread on it. Others have.
Logged

Ignorance is not a lack, but a passion.
Shiny
Site Supporter
Moderated
Toumarches
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Groucho Marxist
Jurisdiction: Dahntahn Stoop Haus
Posts: 13,267


Paint It Red


« Reply #1164 on: October 25, 2013, 06:43:24 PM »

J Michael and LBK:

The "I need help deciphering orthonorm's post" thread.
http://www.orthodoxchristianity.net/forum/index.php/topic,44950.msg756893.html

You're welcome. Since you all complain so much about his posts, I still cannot comprehend that thread isn't near the Random Postings huge.

On topic, Robert Lenz is a weird dude...didn't he do one of Harvey Milk?
« Last Edit: October 25, 2013, 06:43:44 PM by Achronos » Logged

“There is your brother, naked, crying, and you stand there confused over the choice of an attractive floor covering.”

– St. Ambrose of Milan
hecma925
Non-clairvoyant
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: OCA - Diocese of the South
Posts: 6,337


Pray for me, a sinner.


WWW
« Reply #1165 on: October 26, 2013, 08:20:25 PM »

Yeah, it's so gay.

Logged

FatherGiryus
You are being watched.
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Patriarchate of Antioch - NA
Posts: 2,122



« Reply #1166 on: October 27, 2013, 12:58:24 AM »

Where's the Twinkie?

Yeah, it's so gay.


Logged

http://orthodoxyandrecovery.blogspot.com
The most dangerous thing about riding a tiger is the dismount.  - Indian proverb
Shanghaiski
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Antiochian
Posts: 7,973


Holy Trinity Church of Gergeti, Georgia


« Reply #1167 on: October 27, 2013, 05:33:13 PM »

Poor Jesus. Sure wish he would kick the horse habit.



Why he needs to keep a skull nearby when he shoots up is another matter...

I saw this acted out as a skit by a youth group.  Twice.  Live.   

I'm sorry. I would ask why, but...
Logged

Quote from: GabrieltheCelt
If you spend long enough on this forum, you'll come away with all sorts of weird, untrue ideas of Orthodox Christianity.
Quote from: orthonorm
I would suggest most persons in general avoid any question beginning with why.
Mor Ephrem
"Mor is right, you are wrong."
Section Moderator
Hoplitarches
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 17,771


The Pope Emeritus reading OCNet


WWW
« Reply #1168 on: October 27, 2013, 05:37:24 PM »

I'm sorry. I would ask why, but...

No, that's really not necessary.  Tongue
Logged

Apolytikion, Tone 1, by Antonis

An eloquent crafter of divine posts
And an inheritor of the line of the Baptist
A righteous son of India
And a new apostle to the internet
O Holy Mor Ephrem,
Intercede for us, that our forum may be saved.


Mor Ephrem > Justin Kissel
Agabus
The user formerly known as Agabus.
Archon
********
Online Online

Faith: Pan-American Colloquial Convert Hybrid Orthodoxy.
Jurisdiction: We are all uncanonical now.
Posts: 2,361



« Reply #1169 on: November 08, 2013, 11:32:13 PM »

Logged

Blessed Nazarius practiced the ascetic life. His clothes were tattered. He wore his shoes without removing them for six years.

THE OPINIONS HERE MAY NOT REFLECT THE ACTUAL OR PERCEIVED ORTHODOX CHURCH
Tags: schlock Blasphemy icons mechagodzilla 
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 »   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.158 seconds with 73 queries.