OrthodoxChristianity.net
May 21, 2013, 01:30:15 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: If you don't like the Lent theme or it's hard for you to read posts with it, feel free to revert back to the old theme in your profile on the left menu "Look and Layout Preferences."
 
   Home   Help Calendar Contact Treasury Tags Login Register  
Pages: 1   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Vatican: Priests, bishops should wear cassocks  (Read 622 times) Average Rating: 0
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Jetavan
Most Humble Servant of Pan-Vespuccian and Holocenic Hominids
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Traditio Christiana (Proto-Catholic)
Jurisdiction: Dixie
Posts: 4,900


Barlaam and Josaphat


WWW
« on: November 19, 2012, 03:49:16 PM »

Bishops, priests and religious should wear the formal long robes of a cassock during most occasions when visiting Rome, a high-ranking Vatican official has said.

Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, the Vatican's Secretariat of State, made the request for the formal dress in a letter released during last month's Synod of Bishops.
....
"The very example of those who, sealed with the episcopal dignity, are faithful to the daily use of the cassock proper to them, during office hours, becomes an explicit encouragement for all, including for the Episcopates and for those who visit the Roman Curia and Vatican City," Bertone writes.

The cassock is an ankle-length robe distinguished by a series of buttons down the front and a sash worn across the waist. While typically seen worn by bishops and cardinals, priests in many parts of the world are more often seen instead wearing button down shirts with clerical collars.
Logged

If you will, you can become all flame.
Extra caritatem nulla salus.
In order to become whole, take the "I" out of "holiness".
I'm not a witch.
Ἄνω σχῶμεν τὰς καρδίας
"Those who say religion has nothing to do with politics do not know what religion is." -- Mohandas Gandhi
Y dduw bo'r diolch.
choy
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,316


« Reply #1 on: November 19, 2012, 04:16:50 PM »

The 'Doxification of Rome has begun Wink
Logged
Alpo
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: But my heart belongs to internet forums
Posts: 3,545



« Reply #2 on: November 19, 2012, 04:21:38 PM »

The 'Doxification of Rome has begun Wink

If the order was coming straight from the pope I would be tempted to shout spontaneous "AXIOS!"
Logged

Just a little reminder: this forum is not called OrthodoxChristianityUSA.net  Wink Cheesy
Jetavan
Most Humble Servant of Pan-Vespuccian and Holocenic Hominids
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Traditio Christiana (Proto-Catholic)
Jurisdiction: Dixie
Posts: 4,900


Barlaam and Josaphat


WWW
« Reply #3 on: November 19, 2012, 04:47:14 PM »

The 'Doxification of Rome has begun Wink

If the order was coming straight from the pope I would be tempted to shout spontaneous "AXIOS!"


Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, the Vatican's Secretariat of State, made the request for the formal dress in a letter released during last month's Synod of Bishops.

It came at the bequest of Pope Benedict XVI, reports a posting at veteran Italian journalist Sandro Magister's site at the Italian newsmagazine l'Espresso.

Bertone's letter, first made public Monday but dated Oct. 15, asks bishops and cardinals "kindly to guarantee" the observance of a 1982 letter by Pope John Paul II on the matter.

That letter, written by the deceased pontiff to the then-vicar general for the diocese of Rome, asked that priests wear the more formal dress as a "distinguishing mark" which contributes to "the beauty of the priest in his external behavior."
« Last Edit: November 19, 2012, 04:47:37 PM by Jetavan » Logged

If you will, you can become all flame.
Extra caritatem nulla salus.
In order to become whole, take the "I" out of "holiness".
I'm not a witch.
Ἄνω σχῶμεν τὰς καρδίας
"Those who say religion has nothing to do with politics do not know what religion is." -- Mohandas Gandhi
Y dduw bo'r diolch.
biro
Ursus maritimus
Site Supporter
Stratopedarches
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Raised Roman Catholic; now attend GOA
Jurisdiction: Metropolis of Atlanta
Posts: 9,606


Και κλήρονομον δείξον με, ζωής της αιωνίου

fleem
WWW
« Reply #4 on: November 19, 2012, 07:25:09 PM »

The 'Doxification of Rome has begun Wink

What a shame.
Logged

phthalyl.podomatic.com

the-cornet.blogspot.com
Papist
Patriarch of Pontification
Moderated
Stratopedarches
**************
Offline Offline

Faith: Catholic
Jurisdiction: Latin Church: Archdiocese of Santa Fe
Posts: 10,652


Truth, Justice, and the American Way


« Reply #5 on: November 19, 2012, 07:30:02 PM »

The 'Doxification of Rome has begun Wink
More of a return to our own traditions.
Logged

"The only-begotten Son of God, wanting us to be partakers of his divinity, assumed our human nature so that, having become man, he might make men gods." - St. Thomas Aquinas
choy
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,316


« Reply #6 on: November 19, 2012, 07:33:27 PM »

The 'Doxification of Rome has begun Wink
More of a return to our own traditions.

Precisely Wink
Logged
Maria
Orthodox Christian
Archon
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,439


O most Holy Theotokos, save us.


« Reply #7 on: November 19, 2012, 08:54:40 PM »

The 'Doxification of Rome has begun Wink
More of a return to our own traditions.

Precisely Wink

Would that all Orthodox Christian priests and bishops also wear the frock or raissa when in public.
Logged

Glory to Jesus Christ!
Glory to Him forever!
choy
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,316


« Reply #8 on: November 19, 2012, 08:56:32 PM »

Would that all Orthodox Christian priests and bishops also wear the frock or raissa when in public.

Do they?  The few that I know do, not sure if all do.  I guess if they have secular jobs or something, you don't expect them wearing the raissa to work.  I don't know how much of their secular life do they wear their raissa.  Might vary I suspect.
Logged
orthonorm
Protostrator
***************
Offline Offline

Posts: 11,772


The Slippery Slope of Modalism


« Reply #9 on: November 19, 2012, 09:08:59 PM »

Would that all Orthodox Christian priests and bishops also wear the frock or raissa when in public.

Do they?  The few that I know do, not sure if all do.  I guess if they have secular jobs or something, you don't expect them wearing the raissa to work.  I don't know how much of their secular life do they wear their raissa.  Might vary I suspect.

Are you ESL?

Maria is using a somewhat dated construction of the subjunctive minus the oft included exclamation point.

Would that x!

Means something like:

I wish x were so.

The Would that x! construction is a bit more emphatic.

Given the subjunctive usage you can infer the opposite is the case.

« Last Edit: November 19, 2012, 09:10:21 PM by orthonorm » Logged

Quote from: Christian on Monday
We cannot legislate morality by passing laws controlling firearms. The only evil we can combat lies within our hearts.
Quote from: Christian on Tuesday
We need stronger laws to protect the moral foundation of society against the evil of gay marriage.
Jetavan
Most Humble Servant of Pan-Vespuccian and Holocenic Hominids
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Traditio Christiana (Proto-Catholic)
Jurisdiction: Dixie
Posts: 4,900


Barlaam and Josaphat


WWW
« Reply #10 on: November 19, 2012, 09:16:50 PM »

Would that all Orthodox Christian priests and bishops also wear the frock or raissa when in public.

Do they?  The few that I know do, not sure if all do.  I guess if they have secular jobs or something, you don't expect them wearing the raissa to work.  I don't know how much of their secular life do they wear their raissa.  Might vary I suspect.

Are you ESL?

Maria is using a somewhat dated construction of the subjunctive minus the oft included exclamation point.

Would that x!

Means something like:

I wish x were so.

The Would that x! construction is a bit more emphatic.

Given the subjunctive usage you can infer the opposite is the case.

Truth is subjunctive.
Logged

If you will, you can become all flame.
Extra caritatem nulla salus.
In order to become whole, take the "I" out of "holiness".
I'm not a witch.
Ἄνω σχῶμεν τὰς καρδίας
"Those who say religion has nothing to do with politics do not know what religion is." -- Mohandas Gandhi
Y dduw bo'r diolch.
orthonorm
Protostrator
***************
Offline Offline

Posts: 11,772


The Slippery Slope of Modalism


« Reply #11 on: November 19, 2012, 09:18:40 PM »

Would that all Orthodox Christian priests and bishops also wear the frock or raissa when in public.

Do they?  The few that I know do, not sure if all do.  I guess if they have secular jobs or something, you don't expect them wearing the raissa to work.  I don't know how much of their secular life do they wear their raissa.  Might vary I suspect.

Are you ESL?

Maria is using a somewhat dated construction of the subjunctive minus the oft included exclamation point.

Would that x!

Means something like:

I wish x were so.

The Would that x! construction is a bit more emphatic.

Given the subjunctive usage you can infer the opposite is the case.

Truth is subjunctive.

That it were!
Logged

Quote from: Christian on Monday
We cannot legislate morality by passing laws controlling firearms. The only evil we can combat lies within our hearts.
Quote from: Christian on Tuesday
We need stronger laws to protect the moral foundation of society against the evil of gay marriage.
choy
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,316


« Reply #12 on: November 19, 2012, 09:21:16 PM »

Would that all Orthodox Christian priests and bishops also wear the frock or raissa when in public.

Do they?  The few that I know do, not sure if all do.  I guess if they have secular jobs or something, you don't expect them wearing the raissa to work.  I don't know how much of their secular life do they wear their raissa.  Might vary I suspect.

Are you ESL?

Maria is using a somewhat dated construction of the subjunctive minus the oft included exclamation point.

Would that x!

Means something like:

I wish x were so.

The Would that x! construction is a bit more emphatic.

Given the subjunctive usage you can infer the opposite is the case.



Not everyone speaks the same kind of English y'know.
Logged
orthonorm
Protostrator
***************
Offline Offline

Posts: 11,772


The Slippery Slope of Modalism


« Reply #13 on: November 19, 2012, 09:29:37 PM »

Would that all Orthodox Christian priests and bishops also wear the frock or raissa when in public.

Do they?  The few that I know do, not sure if all do.  I guess if they have secular jobs or something, you don't expect them wearing the raissa to work.  I don't know how much of their secular life do they wear their raissa.  Might vary I suspect.

Are you ESL?

Maria is using a somewhat dated construction of the subjunctive minus the oft included exclamation point.

Would that x!

Means something like:

I wish x were so.

The Would that x! construction is a bit more emphatic.

Given the subjunctive usage you can infer the opposite is the case.



Not everyone speaks the same kind of English y'know.

Yeah, except that this use of the subjunctive is pretty much part of the Standard Language. If someone is a bit educated and literate in English, this would either be clear or seem perhaps a bit dated.

Sorry if you are not ESL. Didn't mean to offend.
Logged

Quote from: Christian on Monday
We cannot legislate morality by passing laws controlling firearms. The only evil we can combat lies within our hearts.
Quote from: Christian on Tuesday
We need stronger laws to protect the moral foundation of society against the evil of gay marriage.
choy
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,316


« Reply #14 on: November 19, 2012, 09:34:40 PM »

Yeah, except that this use of the subjunctive is pretty much part of the Standard Language. If someone is a bit educated and literate in English, this would either be clear or seem perhaps a bit dated.

Sorry if you are not ESL. Didn't mean to offend.

No, I am ESL.  But that still doesn't change the fact that the use of English is different from place to place.  Even within the United States.  Though I've pretty much used English my entire life, though it is not my native language and not used as much in our daily life back where I come from.  But English is the second official language there and taught in all levels of school.  Plus there is good access to English language TV programming.  Growing up even the Japanese anime were translated locally to English instead of Filipino.  Only in more recent times has the foreign non-English shows been translated to Filipino instead of English.  And I do live in Canada now.
Logged
orthonorm
Protostrator
***************
Offline Offline

Posts: 11,772


The Slippery Slope of Modalism


« Reply #15 on: November 19, 2012, 09:45:39 PM »

Yeah, except that this use of the subjunctive is pretty much part of the Standard Language. If someone is a bit educated and literate in English, this would either be clear or seem perhaps a bit dated.

Sorry if you are not ESL. Didn't mean to offend.

No, I am ESL.  But that still doesn't change the fact that the use of English is different from place to place.  Even within the United States.  Though I've pretty much used English my entire life, though it is not my native language and not used as much in our daily life back where I come from.  But English is the second official language there and taught in all levels of school.  Plus there is good access to English language TV programming.  Growing up even the Japanese anime were translated locally to English instead of Filipino.  Only in more recent times has the foreign non-English shows been translated to Filipino instead of English.  And I do live in Canada now.

OK, So I stand correct.

Thanks.
Logged

Quote from: Christian on Monday
We cannot legislate morality by passing laws controlling firearms. The only evil we can combat lies within our hearts.
Quote from: Christian on Tuesday
We need stronger laws to protect the moral foundation of society against the evil of gay marriage.
Basil 320
Site Supporter
OC.net guru
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Eastern Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America, Holy Metropolis of Pittsburgh
Posts: 2,293



« Reply #16 on: November 19, 2012, 10:11:24 PM »

Good development.  The rule should be applied to clergy attire while conducting official responsibilities on parish property too.
Logged

"...Strengthen the Orthodox Community..."
FatherGiryus
You are being watched.
High Elder
*
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Patriarchate of Antioch - NA
Posts: 1,806



« Reply #17 on: November 20, 2012, 12:18:30 AM »

Years back, I was at a Greek festival during a very hot summer, and, as I do most of the time, I was in rasso (rather than the clergy shirt & suit).  They asked me to sit next to a senior priest from the 'Old School' (suit, plastic collar that goes all the way around, no beard, etc.).

He looked at me with disgust, then said, "Why do you wear that?"

I looked at him and said, "You are wearing a black wool suit, long-sleeve polyesther shirt with a thick collar, and an undershirt, right?  I'm wearing a cotton cassock with a t-shirt underneith... who's baking to death in this sun right now?"

He looked totally surprised, then nodded.  "I guess that's not a bad idea on a day like today."

We both laughed.  I don't insult him, because he served honorably for 50 years in a very different world.  But, times have changed, and I think the Church is not so afraid of looking 'foreign' anymore...


Good development.  The rule should be applied to clergy attire while conducting official responsibilities on parish property too.
Logged

http://orthodoxyandrecovery.blogspot.com
The most dangerous thing about riding a tiger is the dismount.  - Indian proverb
Achronos
What's so good about Cincinnati? You like it? You think Cincinnati is cool? I've never heard anyone say, 'I'm going to Cincinnati on vacation.'
Site Supporter
Warned
Hoplitarches
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Building Steam with a Grain of Salt
Jurisdiction: Just as little is seen in pure light as in pure darkness.
Posts: 9,307


And we gave him the Rolling Stone cover?!

slxyness
WWW
« Reply #18 on: November 20, 2012, 12:23:33 AM »

Good development.  The rule should be applied to clergy attire while conducting official responsibilities on parish property too.
Why does Met. Phillip not allow the clergy to wear cassocks?
Logged

“Without music, life would be a mistake.”
“The last capitalist we hang shall be the one who sold us the rope.”
"Face the facts of being what you are, for that is what changes what you are."
"We see at once that the words absolute, divine, eternal, and so on do not express what is implied in them.
Nephi
Elder
*
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Antiochian
Posts: 1,236


Ecumenism Lite


« Reply #19 on: November 20, 2012, 12:34:27 AM »

Good development.  The rule should be applied to clergy attire while conducting official responsibilities on parish property too.
Why does Met. Phillip not allow the clergy to wear cassocks?
He doesn't? I'm afraid I can't tell priestly garb apart at all, but I'm pretty sure I see my priest wearing a cassock-looking outfit after liturgy in coffee hour...
Logged
Achronos
What's so good about Cincinnati? You like it? You think Cincinnati is cool? I've never heard anyone say, 'I'm going to Cincinnati on vacation.'
Site Supporter
Warned
Hoplitarches
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Building Steam with a Grain of Salt
Jurisdiction: Just as little is seen in pure light as in pure darkness.
Posts: 9,307


And we gave him the Rolling Stone cover?!

slxyness
WWW
« Reply #20 on: November 20, 2012, 12:52:40 AM »

Good development.  The rule should be applied to clergy attire while conducting official responsibilities on parish property too.
Why does Met. Phillip not allow the clergy to wear cassocks?
He doesn't? I'm afraid I can't tell priestly garb apart at all, but I'm pretty sure I see my priest wearing a cassock-looking outfit after liturgy in coffee hour...
I thought Met Phillip had all the priests required to wear a collarino outside of the parish. Maybe I was wrong.
Logged

“Without music, life would be a mistake.”
“The last capitalist we hang shall be the one who sold us the rope.”
"Face the facts of being what you are, for that is what changes what you are."
"We see at once that the words absolute, divine, eternal, and so on do not express what is implied in them.
Nephi
Elder
*
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Antiochian
Posts: 1,236


Ecumenism Lite


« Reply #21 on: November 20, 2012, 12:56:42 AM »

I thought Met Phillip had all the priests required to wear a collarino outside of the parish. Maybe I was wrong.

Oh, well I guess it is still in the parish. Nevermind then. Tongue
Logged
Cognomen
Site Supporter
High Elder
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Catholic
Jurisdiction: Phyletism Rules, OK
Posts: 1,767


You can run...


« Reply #22 on: November 20, 2012, 02:26:28 AM »

Would that [mean that] all Orthodox Christian priests and bishops also wear the frock or raissa when in public.

Do they?  The few that I know do, not sure if all do.  I guess if they have secular jobs or something, you don't expect them wearing the raissa to work.  I don't know how much of their secular life do they wear their raissa.  Might vary I suspect.
Are you ESL?
Maria is using a somewhat dated construction of the subjunctive minus the oft included exclamation point.
Would that x!
Means something like:
I wish x were so.
The Would that x! construction is a bit more emphatic.
Given the subjunctive usage you can infer the opposite is the case.

Funny.  I just thought she left a couple of words out.
Logged

"Paint a bunch of icons of our Lord and the saints and then kiss them. Also, pray to Mary after she dies in the future."

~ The Epistle of St. Paul to the Antiochians, 46 AD.
Maria
Orthodox Christian
Archon
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,439


O most Holy Theotokos, save us.


« Reply #23 on: November 20, 2012, 02:45:46 AM »

Would that [mean that] all Orthodox Christian priests and bishops also wear the frock or raissa when in public.

Do they?  The few that I know do, not sure if all do.  I guess if they have secular jobs or something, you don't expect them wearing the raissa to work.  I don't know how much of their secular life do they wear their raissa.  Might vary I suspect.
Are you ESL?
Maria is using a somewhat dated construction of the subjunctive minus the oft included exclamation point.
Would that x!
Means something like:
I wish x were so.
The Would that x! construction is a bit more emphatic.
Given the subjunctive usage you can infer the opposite is the case.

Funny.  I just thought she left a couple of words out.

No, I did not leave out any words, and yes, I would have used an exclamation after that statement. Sorry. However, I have been busy making Christmas gifts for my parish and the nearby monastery, so I quickly posted and left to finish a project.

Logged

Glory to Jesus Christ!
Glory to Him forever!
Tags:
Pages: 1   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.12 seconds with 51 queries.