OrthodoxChristianity.net
October 25, 2014, 12:39:21 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Reminder: No political discussions in the public fora.  If you do not have access to the private Politics Forum, please send a PM to Fr. George.
 
   Home   Help Calendar Contact Treasury Tags Login Register  
Pages: 1   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Orthodoxy, heresies, and maths  (Read 768 times) Average Rating: 0
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Theophilos78
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: pro-Israeli Zionist Apostolic Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Adonai Yeshua
Posts: 2,043



« on: October 25, 2012, 10:46:36 AM »

Are the following numerical representations of Orthodox and heretical doctrines correct?

About God

Trinitarian   1+1+1 = 1x3 (1 represents persons in the former and divine essence/nature in the latter)

Sabellianism/Nominalism/Modalism  1=1=1 = 1x1x1 (here = means identical)

Unitarian 1 (3-2) = 1+0 (0=1-1)+0 (0=1-1)

Christological

Eastern Orthodox  1+ 2 (2=1+1) (1 represents subject, 2 represents natures)

Oriental Orthodox  1+1 (1=0,5+0,5)

Nestorianism: 2 (2=1+1) + 2 (2=1+1)

Monophysite 1 + 1 (1=2-1)





« Last Edit: October 25, 2012, 11:02:15 AM by Theophilos78 » Logged

Longing for Heavenly Jerusalem
Føroyingar
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Patriarchate of Moscow (When I make a trip to Iceland)
Posts: 30



« Reply #1 on: October 25, 2012, 10:52:22 AM »

Logged

Melodist
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: The Faith That Established The Universe
Jurisdiction: AOANA
Posts: 2,523



« Reply #2 on: October 25, 2012, 11:11:36 AM »

Are the following numerical representations of Orthodox and heretical doctrines correct?

About God

Trinitarian

1=3

Quote
Christological

1=2

But even though 1=3 and 1=2, 2=/=3
Logged

And FWIW, these are our Fathers too, you know.

Made Perfect in Weakness - Latest Post: The Son of God
Theophilos78
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: pro-Israeli Zionist Apostolic Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Adonai Yeshua
Posts: 2,043



« Reply #3 on: October 25, 2012, 05:17:27 PM »

Are the following numerical representations of Orthodox and heretical doctrines correct?

About God

Trinitarian

1=3

Quote
Christological

1=2

But even though 1=3 and 1=2, 2=/=3

This is beyond me.  Grin
Logged

Longing for Heavenly Jerusalem
Ashman618
High Elder
******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Antiochian
Posts: 504



« Reply #4 on: October 25, 2012, 06:05:36 PM »

Guys guys the entire Trinity is 1 divided by 0 and 3 divided by 0 and in all honesty I actually think this literally explains God mathematically
Logged
biro
Excelsior
Site Supporter
Warned
Toumarches
*****
Online Online

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Greek Orthodox
Posts: 14,073


Και κλήρονομον δείξον με, ζωής της αιωνίου

fleem
WWW
« Reply #5 on: October 25, 2012, 08:07:12 PM »

Guys guys the entire Trinity is 1 divided by 0 and 3 divided by 0 and in all honesty I actually think this literally explains God mathematically

No, it doesn't.
Logged

Charlie Rose: If you could change one thing about the world, what would it be?

Fran Lebowitz: Everything. There is not one thing with which I am satisfied.

http://spcasuncoast.org/
Maria
Orthodox Christian
Warned
Merarches
***********
Offline Offline

Posts: 10,283


O most Holy Theotokos, save us.


« Reply #6 on: October 25, 2012, 08:18:50 PM »

Be careful. Pride comes before the fall.

Some brilliant Russian Orthodox Christians who were obsessed with mathematics became Name-Worshippers.

« Last Edit: October 25, 2012, 08:19:07 PM by Maria » Logged

Glory to Jesus Christ!
Glory to Him forever!
Justin Kissel
Formerly Asteriktos
Protospatharios
****************
Offline Offline

Posts: 30,096


Goodbye for now, my friend


« Reply #7 on: October 25, 2012, 08:28:13 PM »

The answer is 3. I did it in my head, but my math teachers always insisted that I "show my work" (even when I didn't do any work), so...

Logged

Paradosis ≠ Asteriktos ≠ Justin
Ashman618
High Elder
******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Antiochian
Posts: 504



« Reply #8 on: October 25, 2012, 08:33:59 PM »

That's it Im convinced that math is the knowledge of good and evil
Logged
mike
Stratopedarches
**************
Offline Offline

Posts: 21,467


WWW
« Reply #9 on: October 25, 2012, 08:37:53 PM »

Are the following numerical representations of Orthodox and heretical doctrines correct?

About God

Trinitarian   1+1+1 = 1x3 (1 represents persons in the former and divine essence/nature in the latter)

Sabellianism/Nominalism/Modalism  1=1=1 = 1x1x1 (here = means identical)

Unitarian 1 (3-2) = 1+0 (0=1-1)+0 (0=1-1)

Christological

Eastern Orthodox  1+ 2 (2=1+1) (1 represents subject, 2 represents natures)

Oriental Orthodox  1+1 (1=0,5+0,5)

Nestorianism: 2 (2=1+1) + 2 (2=1+1)

Monophysite 1 + 1 (1=2-1)







I'm not such skilled in theology but as we can se all of these statements are tautologies (that means their Boolean value always equals 1). IMO you shouldn't have proved heresies are true so IMO you should try again (and prove heresies to be false).


Are the following numerical representations of Orthodox and heretical doctrines correct?

About God

Trinitarian

1=3

Quote
Christological

1=2

But even though 1=3 and 1=2, 2=/=3

So you are presenting orthodox statement as logically false statements. That might be a better approach since God cannot be understood with our minds...


Seriously, I do not see any sense in that.
« Last Edit: October 25, 2012, 08:39:32 PM by Michał Kalina » Logged

Byzantinism
no longer posting here
Father H
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian--God's One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church
Jurisdiction: UOCofUSA-Ecumenical Patriarchate
Posts: 2,611



« Reply #10 on: October 25, 2012, 09:26:54 PM »

Are the following numerical representations of Orthodox and heretical doctrines correct?

About God

Trinitarian   1+1+1 = 1x3 (1 represents persons in the former and divine essence/nature in the latter)

Sabellianism/Nominalism/Modalism  1=1=1 = 1x1x1 (here = means identical)

Unitarian 1 (3-2) = 1+0 (0=1-1)+0 (0=1-1)

Christological

Eastern Orthodox  1+ 2 (2=1+1) (1 represents subject, 2 represents natures)

Oriental Orthodox  1+1 (1=0,5+0,5)

Nestorianism: 2 (2=1+1) + 2 (2=1+1)

Monophysite 1 + 1 (1=2-1)



In general, this seems correct on the Trinitarian. 

The units must all be coherent on the Orthodox part.  Therefore, on the Incarnational part, I would say:

Orthodox (Chalcedonian)--  1p=1d+1h.  d+h=p.  p-h=d.  p-h=d.  1d+1h=2n  This is where p=person (hypostasis) of Christ, d=divine nature of Christ (which is infinite, thus rendering the equation true but impossible to solve), and h=human nature of Christ.   

Orthodox (non-Chalcedonian or para-Chalcedonian)--  1p=1n=1h+1d.  The only difference here is a disagreement that 1d+1h=2n.  The non-Chalcedonians would rather say:  1d+1h=1n.  This is because they disagree with the Orthodox-Chalcedonian definition that 1p=2n.  Rather, they would say that 1p=1n and agree with the rest. 

Nestorians--2p=2n=1h+1d.  This shows that there is a far gap between Nestorianism and the rest of Christianity (eg for them everything equals two, nothing equals one).   

Monophysite--1a+1b=1c   Here "c" is a different "product" 

Logged
NicholasMyra
Avowed denominationalist
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Antiochian/Greek
Posts: 5,971


When in doubt, say: "you lack the proper φρόνημα"


« Reply #11 on: October 25, 2012, 09:53:26 PM »

This doesn't work because it assumes the same value is used by each number present.

1 hypostasis 2 natures, for example. Who says that a nature has the same value as a hypostasis?
Logged

Quote from: Orthonorm
if Christ does and says x. And someone else does and says not x and you are ever in doubt, follow Christ.
dzheremi
No longer posting here.
Warned
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Coptic
Posts: 4,383


« Reply #12 on: October 25, 2012, 09:55:06 PM »

I thought you weren't a Muslim anymore, Theophilos? Why are you still turning the Holy Trinity into a math problem? Tongue
Logged

Ashman618
High Elder
******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Antiochian
Posts: 504



« Reply #13 on: October 25, 2012, 10:26:49 PM »

The cosin. of the 1 essence times The 2 natures going off on a tang. Add a few fishermen and a tax collector = Orthodoxy  angel
Logged
Father H
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian--God's One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church
Jurisdiction: UOCofUSA-Ecumenical Patriarchate
Posts: 2,611



« Reply #14 on: October 25, 2012, 11:08:02 PM »

This doesn't work because it assumes the same value is used by each number present.

1 hypostasis 2 natures, for example. Who says that a nature has the same value as a hypostasis?

What are you talking about?  You are talking arithmetic, I think.  That's the point of the variables.  Did you not read my post?  I clearly defined all of the terms.  I am sorry that my doctorate, two master's degrees, an undergrad degree with minors in mathemetics and physics, and my position as a member of the board of regents of an Orthodox Seminary and teacher of Dogmatic theology and trustee of the Orthodox Christian Education Commission are not enough for you to have a little more respectful tone than "that doesn't work" on your first impulse.   

The definition of d as infinite (a sideways Cool make all equations work. 

Now, given that, I want you to explain why, with variables clearly defined in the equations giving do not work, either mathematically or theologically.  Since you are so quick to challenge, I want you to explain your position clearly, precisely, and without a hint of ambiguity by way of mathematics or Theology.  I think that I have done so and if you are going to make such bold definitive statements I deserve the same in return. 




Logged
Father H
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian--God's One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church
Jurisdiction: UOCofUSA-Ecumenical Patriarchate
Posts: 2,611



« Reply #15 on: October 25, 2012, 11:09:11 PM »

The cosin. of the 1 essence times The 2 natures going off on a tang. Add a few fishermen and a tax collector = Orthodoxy  angel

Have you been listening to Foxnews radio recently?   Wink
Logged
Father H
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian--God's One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church
Jurisdiction: UOCofUSA-Ecumenical Patriarchate
Posts: 2,611



« Reply #16 on: October 25, 2012, 11:12:26 PM »

I thought you weren't a Muslim anymore, Theophilos? Why are you still turning the Holy Trinity into a math problem? Tongue

Theophilos never turned it into a math problem.  However, when we are discussing numbers, such as one, two, or three, math is involved.  Sorry, but you are wrong and he is right.   
Logged
dzheremi
No longer posting here.
Warned
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Coptic
Posts: 4,383


« Reply #17 on: October 25, 2012, 11:22:35 PM »

As the smiley is meant to suggest, I was being facetious, Father.
Logged

Father H
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian--God's One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church
Jurisdiction: UOCofUSA-Ecumenical Patriarchate
Posts: 2,611



« Reply #18 on: October 25, 2012, 11:41:34 PM »

As the smiley is meant to suggest, I was being facetious, Father.

Gotcha, thanks.  And a blessed night... 
Logged
NicholasMyra
Avowed denominationalist
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Antiochian/Greek
Posts: 5,971


When in doubt, say: "you lack the proper φρόνημα"


« Reply #19 on: October 26, 2012, 01:42:27 AM »

Father,

Sorry for the confusion but I was replying to the OP.
Logged

Quote from: Orthonorm
if Christ does and says x. And someone else does and says not x and you are ever in doubt, follow Christ.
Theophilos78
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: pro-Israeli Zionist Apostolic Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Adonai Yeshua
Posts: 2,043



« Reply #20 on: October 26, 2012, 06:08:01 AM »



I'm not such skilled in theology but as we can se all of these statements are tautologies (that means their Boolean value always equals 1). IMO you shouldn't have proved heresies are true so IMO you should try again (and prove heresies to be false).

I am not trying to prove anything true or false. This is all about numerical representations.  Wink
Logged

Longing for Heavenly Jerusalem
Theophilos78
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: pro-Israeli Zionist Apostolic Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Adonai Yeshua
Posts: 2,043



« Reply #21 on: October 26, 2012, 06:10:20 AM »

I thought you weren't a Muslim anymore, Theophilos? Why are you still turning the Holy Trinity into a math problem? Tongue

This is not a math problem. Only a numerical representation of some doctrines and heresies.  Tongue
Logged

Longing for Heavenly Jerusalem
Theophilos78
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: pro-Israeli Zionist Apostolic Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Adonai Yeshua
Posts: 2,043



« Reply #22 on: October 26, 2012, 06:12:21 AM »

This doesn't work because it assumes the same value is used by each number present.

1 hypostasis 2 natures, for example. Who says that a nature has the same value as a hypostasis?
What is your suggestion? What should I replace numbers with while talking of natures?
Logged

Longing for Heavenly Jerusalem
Theophilos78
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: pro-Israeli Zionist Apostolic Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Adonai Yeshua
Posts: 2,043



« Reply #23 on: October 26, 2012, 06:12:43 AM »

I thought you weren't a Muslim anymore, Theophilos? Why are you still turning the Holy Trinity into a math problem? Tongue

Theophilos never turned it into a math problem.  However, when we are discussing numbers, such as one, two, or three, math is involved.  Sorry, but you are wrong and he is right.   
Thanks, Father!
Logged

Longing for Heavenly Jerusalem
Fabio Leite
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Posts: 3,193



WWW
« Reply #24 on: October 26, 2012, 08:03:03 AM »

Gödel produced a mathematical ontological proof of God. To be honest I don't know enough maths to even understand it, much less to assess its correctness. Anyway, here it is:



To which the "translation" seems to be this:

Definition 1: x is God-like if and only if x has as essential properties those and only those properties which are positive
Definition 2: A is an essence of x if and only if for every property B, x has B necessarily if and only if A entails B
Definition 3: x necessarily exists if and only if every essence of x is necessarily exemplified
Axiom 1: If a property is positive, then its negation is not positive.
Axiom 2: Any property entailed by—i.e., strictly implied by—a positive property is positive
Axiom 3: The property of being God-like is positive
Axiom 4: If a property is positive, then it is necessarily positive
Axiom 5: Necessary existence is positive
Axiom 6: For any property P, if P is positive, then being necessarily P is positive.
Theorem 1: If a property is positive, then it is consistent, i.e., possibly exemplified.
Corollary 1: The property of being God-like is consistent.
Theorem 2: If something is God-like, then the property of being God-like is an essence of that thing.
Theorem 3: Necessarily, the property of being God-like is exemplified.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%27s_ontological_proof
Logged

Many Energies, Three Persons, Two Natures, One God.
HabteSelassie
Ises and I-ity
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Oriental Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church
Posts: 3,332



« Reply #25 on: October 26, 2012, 02:04:48 PM »

Greetings in that Divine and Most Precious Name of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ!



I wonder if this is in part what Isaac Newton invented calculus for, apart from trying to uncover Biblical secrets of Gammetria?

stay blessed,
habte selassie
Logged

"Yet stand aloof from stupid questionings and geneologies and strifes and fightings about law, for they are without benefit and vain." Titus 3:10
Father H
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian--God's One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church
Jurisdiction: UOCofUSA-Ecumenical Patriarchate
Posts: 2,611



« Reply #26 on: October 27, 2012, 11:21:25 PM »

Father,

Sorry for the confusion but I was replying to the OP.

In that case, I am the one who is sorry.  A blessed Lord's day to you. 
Logged
Tags: heresies  orthodoxy  councils  maths  numbers  
Pages: 1   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.1 seconds with 54 queries.