i BELIEVE THE PROBLEM WITH MW IS NOT HIS REVISIONIST VIEWS ABOUT HOLOCAUST.
What could be worse?
A lot of things.
In my honest opinion:
One thing is being a revisionist (a lot of people is revisionist towards the Holodomor and that not makes them communists at all so being revisionist about Holocaust IMHO doesnt make you a nazi or apologist of murder as long as you examine things very carefully ). You can express your opinion about numbers and methods without denying the whole horrible murder.
Other is being an Holocaust denialist, denying ALL Holocaust and saying "No jew died in WWII".
Other is being a nazi and being happy about jewish murders and saying "oh, jews deserve that". (Usually denialists and nazis can go together).
In that TV interview BW was more a revisionist than a denialist IMHO.
Does that make him a good guy? Not in my opinion. Why? Because he has said a lot of bad things and his thought line represents the most reactionary catholic teaching only below radical sedevacantists... and scares me to death, but not for the "revisionist" thing expressed on TV.
No one can acuse me of being anti jewish. In the thread about "RC and jewish conversions" I was very angry about RC historical policies towards jewish people. I expressed that RC must leave jews alone because they are hiper sensitive because of past sufferings. Not all jews are bad people and you cannot force conversions on people. I said that very clearly and that I'm also ashamed because RC historical treatment of jews. We cannot view jews as intrinsically evil people and Christ killers. Not all jews killed Christ and today's jews are not guilty for 1st century sanhedrin decisions and even not all sanhedrin was against Christ (Nicodemus and Joseph of Arimatea). Bad jewish people pleaded for Christ murder instead of Barrabas... but not all jewish people...so...
*In that specific interview BW wasnt denialist IMHO, only revisionist
*He could be a denialist but we cannot said this based only in that TV interview.
*He has very wrong views about jews because he follows reactionary RC teachings: jews as intrinsically evil, Christ killers and all of that so I'm not his fan of supporter. We know that not for his TV interview but for his speeches, Eleison Comments, and a lot of commentaries of SPPXers and ex members of that congregation.
*He also has very misoginystic views. Women should not go to university in his opinion."Ideas are not for true girls".
*His love for Ancient Regime: this includes believing in slavery as a good system?
*His beliefs about Inquisition as a good thing.
Etc etc etc
So: the problem is much worse than expressing revisionist views in TV ... he has a LOT of trash ideas... that I will not support ever...including ones about jews... but I have to make the distinction between revisionism and denialism... because we apply revisionism to a lot of other historical events... involving murder ... so don't be hipocritical.. IMHO.