OrthodoxChristianity.net
September 30, 2014, 12:48:17 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Reminder: No political discussions in the public fora.  If you do not have access to the private Politics Forum, please send a PM to Fr. George.
 
   Home   Help Calendar Contact Treasury Tags Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 »  All   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: A Faded Piece of Papyrus Refers to Jesus’ Wife  (Read 2815 times) Average Rating: 0
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
JoeS2
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Catholic by choice
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 1,129


St. Mark Defender of the true Faith (old CAF guy)


« on: September 18, 2012, 03:39:32 PM »

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/19/us/historian-says-piece-of-papyrus-refers-to-jesus-wife.html?_r=1

Translated legible text
“not [to] me. My mother gave to me li[fe]”“The disciples said to Jesus”“deny. Mary is worthy
of it”“Jesus said to them,
“My wife”“she will be able to
be my disciple”“Let wicked people
swell up”“As for me, I dwell with her in order to”“an image

Logged
Father Peter
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: British Orthodox Church within the Coptic Orthodox Patriarchate
Posts: 2,651



WWW
« Reply #1 on: September 18, 2012, 03:45:39 PM »

And?
Logged

Lord have mercy upon me a sinner
http://www.orthodoxmedway.org

My blog - http://anorthodoxpriest.blogspot.co.uk

The poster formerly known as peterfarrington
HabteSelassie
Ises and I-ity
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Oriental Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church
Posts: 3,332



« Reply #2 on: September 18, 2012, 03:47:43 PM »

Greetings in that Divine and Most Precious Name of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ!





stay blessed,
habte selassie
Logged

"Yet stand aloof from stupid questionings and geneologies and strifes and fightings about law, for they are without benefit and vain." Titus 3:10
Shiny
Site Supporter
Moderated
Toumarches
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Groucho Marxist
Jurisdiction: Dahntahn Stoop Haus
Posts: 13,267


Paint It Red


« Reply #3 on: September 18, 2012, 03:53:29 PM »

Smells like a scam.
Logged

“There is your brother, naked, crying, and you stand there confused over the choice of an attractive floor covering.”

– St. Ambrose of Milan
JoeS2
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Catholic by choice
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 1,129


St. Mark Defender of the true Faith (old CAF guy)


« Reply #4 on: September 18, 2012, 04:01:56 PM »

And?

I wonder if this was carbon dated?  And if so does the term "Wife" mean the same then as if does now.  I remember Jesus' "brothers" but we also know that "brothers" had many conotations such as close relatives , step children, close friends, etc.
Logged
rakovsky
Protokentarchos
*********
Online Online

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Orthodox Church in America
Posts: 4,371



WWW
« Reply #5 on: September 18, 2012, 04:13:01 PM »

In the gospels doesn't Jesus actually refer to His wife, or "bride", as the Church and himself as the bridegroom?
Logged
WeldeMikael
High Elder
******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Posts: 506


« Reply #6 on: September 18, 2012, 04:17:26 PM »

Maybe it is like :

Matthew (KJV) 12:48-50 : "But he answered and said unto him that told him, Who is my mother? and who are my brethren?

And he stretched forth his hand toward his disciples, and said, Behold my mother and my brethren!

For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother."


Do you think it's relevant ?
Logged
Father Peter
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: British Orthodox Church within the Coptic Orthodox Patriarchate
Posts: 2,651



WWW
« Reply #7 on: September 18, 2012, 04:29:33 PM »

Without knowing a great deal more about this scrap it is not relevant.

Who wrote it, when was it written, why was it written?
Logged

Lord have mercy upon me a sinner
http://www.orthodoxmedway.org

My blog - http://anorthodoxpriest.blogspot.co.uk

The poster formerly known as peterfarrington
orthonorm
Hoplitarches
*************
Offline Offline

Faith: Sola Gratia
Jurisdiction: Outside
Posts: 16,506



« Reply #8 on: September 18, 2012, 04:30:51 PM »

Oh it is just the 4th century version of Innocence of Muslims.

Just look at the poor production value involved . . .
Logged

Ignorance is not a lack, but a passion.
Carl Kraeff (Second Chance)
Warned
Taxiarches
**********
Online Online

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 6,822



« Reply #9 on: September 18, 2012, 05:02:54 PM »

Without knowing a great deal more about this scrap it is not relevant.

Who wrote it, when was it written, why was it written?

Precisely. There is no question that (a) Orthodox Christianity was predominant but that (b) there were heresies as well. See The Heresy of Orthodoxy: How Contemporary Culture's Fascination with Diversity Has Reshaped Our Understanding of Early Christianity by Andreas J. Kostenberger, Michael J. Kruger and I. Howard Marshall (2010).
Logged

Michal: "SC, love you in this thread."
Jetavan
Argumentum ad australopithecum
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Science to the Fourth Power
Jurisdiction: Ohayo Gozaimasu
Posts: 6,580


Barlaam and Josaphat


WWW
« Reply #10 on: September 18, 2012, 05:32:59 PM »

Quote
King gave an interview and showed the papyrus fragment, encased in glass, to reporters from The New York Times, The Boston Globe and Harvard Magazine in her garret office in the tower at Harvard Divinity School last Thursday. She left the next day for Rome to deliver her paper on the find on Tuesday at the International Congress of Coptic Studies.

She repeatedly cautioned that this fragment should not be taken as proof that Jesus, the historical person, was actually married. The text was probably written centuries after Jesus lived, and all other early, historically reliable Christian literature is silent on the question, she said.

But the discovery is exciting, King said, because it is the first known statement from antiquity that refers to Jesus speaking of a wife. It provides further evidence that there was an active discussion among early Christians about whether Jesus was celibate or married, and which path his followers should choose.
Logged

If you will, you can become all flame.
Extra caritatem nulla salus.
In order to become whole, take the "I" out of "holiness".
सर्वभूतहित
Ἄνω σχῶμεν τὰς καρδίας
"Those who say religion has nothing to do with politics do not know what religion is." -- Mohandas Gandhi
Y dduw bo'r diolch.
Sinful Hypocrite
Everyday I am critical of others. Every day I make similar mistakes. Every day I am a hypocrite.
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Greek Orthodox
Jurisdiction: "The Orthodox Church" by Bishop Kallistos Ware: "We know where the Church is but we cannot be sure where it is not; and so we must refrain from passing judgment on non-Orthodox Christians."
Posts: 1,726


Great googly moogly!


« Reply #11 on: September 18, 2012, 08:07:20 PM »

http://news.yahoo.com/jesus-had-wife-newly-discovered-gospel-suggests-202727064.html

It was announced today that it was being studied since last year and it has been declared authentic today. However it is cut short where it says that he had a wife, so it is ambiguous at best.
Logged

The Lord gathers his sheep, I fear I am a goat. Lord have mercy.

"A Christian is someone who follows and worships a perfectly good God who revealed his true face through the life, death and resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth.“
Justin Kissel
Formerly Asteriktos
Protospatharios
****************
Offline Offline

Posts: 29,960


black metal cat


« Reply #12 on: September 18, 2012, 08:17:36 PM »

I feel a merge coming on...  Cool
Logged

"But science is an inferential exercise, not a catalog of facts. Numbers, by themselves, specify nothing. All depends upon what you do with them" - Stephen Jay Gould
Punch
Protokentarchos
*********
Online Online

Faith: Christian
Jurisdiction: Body of Christ
Posts: 5,450



« Reply #13 on: September 18, 2012, 09:04:59 PM »

Blasphemy
Logged

I would be happy to agree with you, but then both of us would be wrong.
dzheremi
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Coptic
Posts: 4,309


« Reply #14 on: September 18, 2012, 09:22:01 PM »

Who declared it 'authentic'? The Church? And if not the Church, then what does calling it 'authentic' even mean? Probably just "really, really old", which, yeah okay fine, but who really cares? Lots of writings are really old. It doesn't make them true.
Logged

Agabus
The user formerly known as Agabus.
Archon
********
Online Online

Faith: Pan-American Colloquial Convert Hybrid Orthodoxy.
Jurisdiction: We are all uncanonical now.
Posts: 2,299



« Reply #15 on: September 18, 2012, 09:30:42 PM »

A piece of ancient garbage says a guy named Jesus said something that had the word "wife" in it.

Come back when you have something interesting.
Logged

Blessed Nazarius practiced the ascetic life. His clothes were tattered. He wore his shoes without removing them for six years.

THE OPINIONS HERE MAY NOT REFLECT THE ACTUAL OR PERCEIVED ORTHODOX CHURCH
Kerdy
Warned
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,732


« Reply #16 on: September 18, 2012, 09:38:57 PM »

People say silly things all the time, but they don't make it on the news.  I have a feeling the Apostles would have known in Jesus was married.  If they didn't, the Theotokos would have known for sure.

BTW - how did it get categorized as a gospel anyway?

Sounds gnostic to me.

"Was Jesus married? "
No

"If so, was Mary Magdalene his wife? "
No

"And did he have a female disciple?"
Billions of them.  I thought these guys were supposed to be smart.
« Last Edit: September 18, 2012, 09:45:57 PM by Kerdy » Logged
Maria
Orthodox Christian
Merarches
***********
Offline Offline

Posts: 9,578


O most Holy Theotokos, save us.


« Reply #17 on: September 18, 2012, 09:51:51 PM »

A piece of ancient garbage says a guy named Jesus said something that had the word "wife" in it.

Come back when you have something interesting.

Just because a piece of fabric is ancient, does not mean that the words inscribed are true (Orthodox).

There are lots of gnostic gospels which are very ancient, but they were never accepted into the Orthodox canon because they were not Orthodox.
« Last Edit: September 18, 2012, 09:52:52 PM by Maria » Logged

Glory to Jesus Christ!
Glory to Him forever!
Aindriú
Faster! Funnier!
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Cynical
Jurisdiction: Vestibule of Hell
Posts: 3,918



WWW
« Reply #18 on: September 18, 2012, 09:54:36 PM »

It's from the fourth century. Unless you're Bart Erhman, you probably shouldn't consider this too hard.
Logged


I'm going to need this.
Nephi
Section Moderator
Protokentarchos
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Non-Chalcedonian Chalcedonian
Jurisdiction: Greek Orthodox Church of Antioch
Posts: 4,462



« Reply #19 on: September 18, 2012, 11:28:10 PM »

Apart from obviously defying and ignoring Tradition, is there a theological problem with the idea of Christ having a wife? I've tried to think of one, but maybe someone else knows of any problems it causes.
Logged
PeterTheAleut
The Right Blowhard Peter the Furtive of Yetts O'Muckhart
Section Moderator
Protospatharios
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 32,325


Lord, have mercy on the Christians in Mosul!


« Reply #20 on: September 19, 2012, 12:04:44 AM »

Ho hum. There's nothing new under the sun.
Logged
Kerdy
Warned
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,732


« Reply #21 on: September 19, 2012, 12:39:01 AM »

Apart from obviously defying and ignoring Tradition, is there a theological problem with the idea of Christ having a wife? I've tried to think of one, but maybe someone else knows of any problems it causes.
You mean other than someone who claimed to be God in the flesh and born of a virgin succumbing to earthly desires for a woman?
« Last Edit: September 19, 2012, 12:39:58 AM by Kerdy » Logged
Nephi
Section Moderator
Protokentarchos
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Non-Chalcedonian Chalcedonian
Jurisdiction: Greek Orthodox Church of Antioch
Posts: 4,462



« Reply #22 on: September 19, 2012, 12:42:16 AM »

succumbing to earthly desires for a woman?
Lust isn't a requirement for marriage, and Christ wouldn't have committed it had he married.

Again I'm not saying Christ did marry - I'm just asking questions.
Logged
Kerdy
Warned
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,732


« Reply #23 on: September 19, 2012, 12:47:09 AM »

succumbing to earthly desires for a woman?
Lust isn't a requirement for marriage, and Christ wouldn't have committed it had he married.

Again I'm not saying Christ did marry - I'm just asking questions.
I understand you, no problem.

Marriage was designed for companionship and procreation.  To procreate there must be a little desire for the woman.  For that, then God would lust after worldly things.  Companionship was filled by the hundreds who followed him.  Besides, why would God need a wife?
« Last Edit: September 19, 2012, 12:49:54 AM by Kerdy » Logged
Nephi
Section Moderator
Protokentarchos
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Non-Chalcedonian Chalcedonian
Jurisdiction: Greek Orthodox Church of Antioch
Posts: 4,462



« Reply #24 on: September 19, 2012, 12:52:35 AM »

Marriage was designed for companionship and procreation.  To procreate their must be a little desire for the woman.  For that, then God would list after worldly things.
But wouldn't that mean that marriage was designed for lust, or to contain lust? If it was designed to have lust, then it was designed to further sin. If that's the case, then marriage is antithetical to the Christian life, right? Since that can't be the case, then it would seem to be fine that Christ could've participated in it without lust.

Quote
Besides, why would God need a wife?
To assume marriage in order to heal it? I'm not sure, but the idea that everything of ours was assumed/healed by Christ does seem to leave out marriage (but correct me if I'm wrong).
« Last Edit: September 19, 2012, 12:53:30 AM by Nephi » Logged
Kerdy
Warned
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,732


« Reply #25 on: September 19, 2012, 04:16:44 AM »

Marriage was designed for companionship and procreation.  To procreate their must be a little desire for the woman.  For that, then God would list after worldly things.
But wouldn't that mean that marriage was designed for lust, or to contain lust? If it was designed to have lust, then it was designed to further sin. If that's the case, then marriage is antithetical to the Christian life, right? Since that can't be the case, then it would seem to be fine that Christ could've participated in it without lust.

Quote
Besides, why would God need a wife?
To assume marriage in order to heal it? I'm not sure, but the idea that everything of ours was assumed/healed by Christ does seem to leave out marriage (but correct me if I'm wrong).

I have far too much to reply with than I can type on my phone so I will simply say I don't agree with your assessment of marriage.  I can understand your view but I thinks it's a little off.
Logged
Αριστοκλής
Merarches
***********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Catholic
Jurisdiction: American Carpatho-Russian Orthodox Diocese
Posts: 10,026


« Reply #26 on: September 19, 2012, 06:20:26 AM »

I feel another Special on History International coming soon - along with their usual reliability issues.
Logged

"Religion is a neurobiological illness and Orthodoxy is its cure." - Fr. John S. Romanides
primuspilus
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Antiochian Orthodox Archdiocese of North America - Western Rite Orthodox
Posts: 6,426


Inserting personal quote here.


WWW
« Reply #27 on: September 19, 2012, 06:27:08 AM »

As I mentioned before to someone. Just because something is old, does not mean it is accurate. Marcion's "gospel" is pretty darn old also. It'll just give fuel to the fire of the Dan Brown types, and the Jesus haters. It'll also be another "eye roller" to Christians.

On a note, the Dr. being quoted (Dr. King) has some pretty odd things to say about 2nd century Christian issues. Look her up. Its pretty funny.

PP
« Last Edit: September 19, 2012, 06:27:49 AM by primuspilus » Logged

"I confidently affirm that whoever calls himself Universal Bishop is the precursor of Antichrist"
Gregory the Great

"Never, never, never let anyone tell you that, in order to be Orthodox, you must also be eastern." St. John Maximovitch, The Wonderworker
Gorazd
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: The Ecumenical Patriarchate of Istanbul and Chambésy
Posts: 1,955



« Reply #28 on: September 19, 2012, 06:58:06 AM »

It's a snippet, right? Not the whole text. I guess the "wife" probably was a metaphor for the Church?
Logged
Keble
All-Knowing Grand Wizard of Debunking
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,418



« Reply #29 on: September 19, 2012, 07:46:42 AM »

It's almost certainly real, and it's certainly Gnostic if it is real.
Logged
Punch
Protokentarchos
*********
Online Online

Faith: Christian
Jurisdiction: Body of Christ
Posts: 5,450



« Reply #30 on: September 19, 2012, 09:47:56 AM »

Apart from obviously defying and ignoring Tradition, is there a theological problem with the idea of Christ having a wife? I've tried to think of one, but maybe someone else knows of any problems it causes.

Yes, because the entire Church is the Bride of Christ, and the Church is One.  Christ was not a bigamist.
Logged

I would be happy to agree with you, but then both of us would be wrong.
Nephi
Section Moderator
Protokentarchos
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Non-Chalcedonian Chalcedonian
Jurisdiction: Greek Orthodox Church of Antioch
Posts: 4,462



« Reply #31 on: September 19, 2012, 09:55:08 AM »

Yes, because the entire Church is the Bride of Christ, and the Church is One.  Christ was not a bigamist.

I hadn't considered that. Good point.
Logged
vamrat
Vamratoraptor
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Serbian Orthodox
Jurisdiction: New Gracanica
Posts: 7,757



« Reply #32 on: September 19, 2012, 10:03:19 AM »

Apart from obviously defying and ignoring Tradition, is there a theological problem with the idea of Christ having a wife? I've tried to think of one, but maybe someone else knows of any problems it causes.

Yes, because the entire Church is the Bride of Christ, and the Church is One.  Christ was not a bigamist.

The Church is the bride of Christ.

What a fitting metaphor.
Logged
Punch
Protokentarchos
*********
Online Online

Faith: Christian
Jurisdiction: Body of Christ
Posts: 5,450



« Reply #33 on: September 19, 2012, 10:10:17 AM »

Apart from obviously defying and ignoring Tradition, is there a theological problem with the idea of Christ having a wife? I've tried to think of one, but maybe someone else knows of any problems it causes.

Yes, because the entire Church is the Bride of Christ, and the Church is One.  Christ was not a bigamist.

The Church is the bride of Christ.

What a fitting metaphor.

Yes.  He probably remained celibate here on Earth because He knew what kind of a whore He would marry afterward.  I think about this often, and weep.  I often hate humanity because I cannot comprehend God's Love.  My small mind and tarnished soul lacks the ability to comprehend such a wonder.  It can only feel part of the pain that He must feel when He looks down upon us.
Logged

I would be happy to agree with you, but then both of us would be wrong.
Ashman618
High Elder
******
Offline Offline

Faith: Ukranian catholic
Jurisdiction: Philadelphia
Posts: 503



« Reply #34 on: September 19, 2012, 12:07:57 PM »

Apart from obviously defying and ignoring Tradition, is there a theological problem with the idea of Christ having a wife? I've tried to think of one, but maybe someone else knows of any problems it causes.

Yes, because the entire Church is the Bride of Christ, and the Church is One.  Christ was not a bigamist.

The Church is the bride of Christ.

What a fitting metaphor.

Yes.  He probably remained celibate here on Earth because He knew what kind of a whore He would marry afterward.  I think about this often, and weep.  I often hate humanity because I cannot comprehend God's Love.  My small mind and tarnished soul lacks the ability to comprehend such a wonder.  It can only feel part of the pain that He must feel when He looks down upon us.

Yes I'm glad to see someone else who thinks that Christs suffering humanity did not end on the cross but continues when he looks at His Church Sad
Logged
augustin717
Warned
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: The other ROC
Posts: 5,634



« Reply #35 on: September 19, 2012, 12:28:33 PM »

It's a promising step towards establishing more solidly conservative credentials for our Lord's public image; we are now waiting on the discovery of  papyri of Jesus' investments in Bain Capital.
« Last Edit: September 19, 2012, 12:41:37 PM by augustin717 » Logged
Monk Vasyl
High Elder
******
Offline Offline

Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: UOC of USA
Posts: 623


Monk Vasyl
WWW
« Reply #36 on: September 19, 2012, 12:32:58 PM »

Jesus being God, how could He have a wife?  Would their children be demi-gods?  People these days will believe anything.  So much for being a more advanced society.    Huh
Logged

The unworthy hierodeacon, Vasyl
HabteSelassie
Ises and I-ity
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Oriental Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church
Posts: 3,332



« Reply #37 on: September 19, 2012, 12:38:45 PM »

Greetings in that Divine and Most Precious Name of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ!

Apart from obviously defying and ignoring Tradition, is there a theological problem with the idea of Christ having a wife? I've tried to think of one, but maybe someone else knows of any problems it causes.

Christ already has a wife, it is the Church who is also the Bride of Christ. It is not a coincidence that the Divine Liturgy is used to celebrate marriages, because through the imagery of Revelations we come to understand that the Liturgy and Holy Communion also signifies through ritual practice our marriage with Christ, having been joined to His Body as one.

stay blessed,
habte selassie
Logged

"Yet stand aloof from stupid questionings and geneologies and strifes and fightings about law, for they are without benefit and vain." Titus 3:10
orthonorm
Hoplitarches
*************
Offline Offline

Faith: Sola Gratia
Jurisdiction: Outside
Posts: 16,506



« Reply #38 on: September 19, 2012, 12:42:02 PM »

It's a promising step towards establishing more solidly conservative credentials for our Lord's public image; we are now waiting on the discovery of  papyri of Jesus' investments in Bain Capital.

Brilliant.
Logged

Ignorance is not a lack, but a passion.
Jetavan
Argumentum ad australopithecum
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Science to the Fourth Power
Jurisdiction: Ohayo Gozaimasu
Posts: 6,580


Barlaam and Josaphat


WWW
« Reply #39 on: September 19, 2012, 02:00:25 PM »

It's a snippet, right? Not the whole text. I guess the "wife" probably was a metaphor for the Church?
Did the early Christians ever describe the Church as "wife", rather than "bride"?
Logged

If you will, you can become all flame.
Extra caritatem nulla salus.
In order to become whole, take the "I" out of "holiness".
सर्वभूतहित
Ἄνω σχῶμεν τὰς καρδίας
"Those who say religion has nothing to do with politics do not know what religion is." -- Mohandas Gandhi
Y dduw bo'r diolch.
dzheremi
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Coptic
Posts: 4,309


« Reply #40 on: September 19, 2012, 02:04:28 PM »

Apart from obviously defying and ignoring Tradition, is there a theological problem with the idea of Christ having a wife? I've tried to think of one, but maybe someone else knows of any problems it causes.

Yes, because the entire Church is the Bride of Christ, and the Church is One.  Christ was not a bigamist.

The Church is the bride of Christ.

What a fitting metaphor.

Yes.  He probably remained celibate here on Earth because He knew what kind of a whore He would marry afterward.

Pardon me? Am I reading you correctly...did you just use that word with reference to the Church?  Huh

Boy, with friends like these, eh... Sad
Logged

HabteSelassie
Ises and I-ity
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Oriental Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church
Posts: 3,332



« Reply #41 on: September 19, 2012, 02:14:21 PM »

Greetings in that Divine and Most Precious Name of Our Lord and Savor Jesus Christ!

Apart from obviously defying and ignoring Tradition, is there a theological problem with the idea of Christ having a wife? I've tried to think of one, but maybe someone else knows of any problems it causes.

Yes, because the entire Church is the Bride of Christ, and the Church is One.  Christ was not a bigamist.

The Church is the bride of Christ.

What a fitting metaphor.

Yes.  He probably remained celibate here on Earth because He knew what kind of a whore He would marry afterward.

Pardon me? Am I reading you correctly...did you just use that word with reference to the Church?  Huh

Boy, with friends like these, eh... Sad

Considering the allusions to prostitution and fornication that saturate the imagery and symbolism of the Prophets, and even some of the Epistles and especially the Revelations warning to the Seven Churches, I would suppose that is quite an apt and insightful comparison fully in compatibility with the feel of the Scriptures. Perhaps it could have had a more tasteful delivery, but the premise of the analogy seems sound to me Wink

stay blessed,
habte selassie
Logged

"Yet stand aloof from stupid questionings and geneologies and strifes and fightings about law, for they are without benefit and vain." Titus 3:10
dzheremi
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Coptic
Posts: 4,309


« Reply #42 on: September 19, 2012, 02:21:15 PM »

Well that's why I asked if I was understanding Punch correctly, because it strikes me as distasteful but could have a reasonable explanation...
Logged

orthonorm
Hoplitarches
*************
Offline Offline

Faith: Sola Gratia
Jurisdiction: Outside
Posts: 16,506



« Reply #43 on: September 19, 2012, 02:36:09 PM »

Well that's why I asked if I was understanding Punch correctly, because it strikes me as distasteful but could have a reasonable explanation...

Hey, I've heard others with more notoriety, if less notorious, than our dear Punch refer to the Church as a whore.
Logged

Ignorance is not a lack, but a passion.
NicholasMyra
Taxiarches
**********
Online Online

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Antiochian/Greek
Posts: 5,924


Avowed denominationalist


« Reply #44 on: September 19, 2012, 02:48:53 PM »

Neoplatonic Christians loved to write Jesus fanfics. Normally these fanfics turned one of the Apostles into a Mary Sue character. Mary Sues, by definition, must be the lead's love interest. Because it is not canon to ship Jesus with a man, they had to either do it very vaguely ("Gnostic" lost Gospel of Mark) or use the hippest woman (Mary Magdalene). The expansion pack to the Gospel of Thomas features Mary Sue-gdalene as one of the first women allowed to become a living Spirit by transforming herself into a man. They would often write crossovers with other fanfics like Plato's Republic because the Hellenes wrote a great expanded universe.

The fanfic featured above in the OP really needs an editor. I charge 20$ per hour, plus Moroccan iced teas.
Logged

Quote from: Orthonorm
if Christ does and says x. And someone else does and says not x and you are ever in doubt, follow Christ.

"You are philosophical innovators. As for me, I follow the Fathers." -Every heresiarch ever
Tags:
Pages: 1 2 »  All   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.132 seconds with 72 queries.