OrthodoxChristianity.net
May 21, 2013, 11:46:11 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: If you don't like the Lent theme or it's hard for you to read posts with it, feel free to revert back to the old theme in your profile on the left menu "Look and Layout Preferences."
 
   Home   Help Calendar Contact Treasury Tags Login Register  
Pages: 1   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Oriental Orthodoxy and Biblical Infallibility  (Read 483 times) Average Rating: 0
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Severian
Copto-Arabic Hotshot.
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Christian
Jurisdiction: Coptic Orthodoxy
Posts: 3,830


Holy Patriarch St Severus of Antioch, pray for us!


WWW
« on: September 17, 2012, 11:22:08 AM »

So I know that we OO believe the Bible is infallible on matters of faith, practice, and salvation. But is it also infallible/inerrant on matters of science, history, and geography? It has been said before that some Fathers said that God purposely placed contradictions in the Biblical text so that the believer can search for the greater spiritual meaning behind it. Is this the view accepted by the entire Church?

As much as possible, I would like primary references from either modern OO Theologians or ancient Patristics.

Thanks
« Last Edit: September 17, 2012, 11:22:19 AM by Severian » Logged

Christ is risen!
!المسيح قام
Χριστός ἀνέστη!
ⲠⲓⲬⲣⲓⲥⲧⲟⲥ ⲁϥⲧⲱⲛϥ!
Christus resurrexit!
Come and join OCnet's new book club!
sheenj
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Faith: Oriental Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Indian/Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church
Posts: 990


St. Gregorios of Parumala, pray for us...


« Reply #1 on: September 17, 2012, 12:05:12 PM »

So I know that we OO believe the Bible is infallible on matters of faith, practice, and salvation. But is it also infallible/inerrant on matters of science, history, and geography? It has been said before that some Fathers said that God purposely placed contradictions in the Biblical text so that the believer can search for the greater spiritual meaning behind it. Is this the view accepted by the entire Church?

As much as possible, I would like primary references from either modern OO Theologians or ancient Patristics.

Thanks
I'm still not convinced the very concept of infallibility is Orthodox...
Logged
Severian
Copto-Arabic Hotshot.
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Christian
Jurisdiction: Coptic Orthodoxy
Posts: 3,830


Holy Patriarch St Severus of Antioch, pray for us!


WWW
« Reply #2 on: September 22, 2012, 11:55:08 AM »

So I know that we OO believe the Bible is infallible on matters of faith, practice, and salvation. But is it also infallible/inerrant on matters of science, history, and geography? It has been said before that some Fathers said that God purposely placed contradictions in the Biblical text so that the believer can search for the greater spiritual meaning behind it. Is this the view accepted by the entire Church?

As much as possible, I would like primary references from either modern OO Theologians or ancient Patristics.

Thanks
Logged

Christ is risen!
!المسيح قام
Χριστός ἀνέστη!
ⲠⲓⲬⲣⲓⲥⲧⲟⲥ ⲁϥⲧⲱⲛϥ!
Christus resurrexit!
Come and join OCnet's new book club!
dzheremi
Archon
*
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Coptic
Posts: 3,056


« Reply #3 on: September 22, 2012, 12:05:10 PM »

I'm just some guy, but I've never heard that. Maybe a better question to ask is does it matter if it is infallible in matters outside of faith, practice, and salvation? I mean, even those things which point to it being right in matters of geography or anthropology (such as the decipherment of the Hitite language) are not really matters of faith, but advancements in those particular fields which help us understand a bit more of the societal context of the Bible. I don't know about you, but I believe in the witness of the Gospels and the prophecies of the Old Testament concerning Jesus Christ our Lord because He did indeed fulfill the same, and did indeed come and save us, not because Paran is where they said it was, or some archaeologists found some Edomite coins or something. If none of that had happened, it wouldn't change what has.
Logged

NicholasMyra
Christos Anesti!
Warned
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Antiochian
Posts: 4,936


Stiff-neck'ed man


« Reply #4 on: September 22, 2012, 12:19:36 PM »

I'm still not convinced the very concept of infallibility is Orthodox...
Ditto
Logged
Father Peter
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: British Orthodox Church within the Coptic Orthodox Patriarchate
Posts: 2,532



WWW
« Reply #5 on: September 22, 2012, 02:03:36 PM »

Nor me
Logged

Lord have mercy upon me a sinner
http://www.orthodoxmedway.org
Study the Orthodox Faith online with the London School of Orthodox Christian Studies
http://www.lsocs.co.uk

The poster formerly known as peterfarrington
Warda
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Faith: Christian
Jurisdiction: Oriental Orthodox
Posts: 2


« Reply #6 on: October 27, 2012, 05:29:42 AM »

Hello,

I'm new to this forum. I have been checking out the threads from time to time for the past few weeks, but this one caught my attention. Could someone please clarify what is meant by "I'm not sure the concept of infallibility is Orthodox"? What is the correct Orthodox view of the Bible?

Thanks
Logged
Salpy
Moderator
Stratopedarches
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Oriental Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Armenian Church
Posts: 10,329



« Reply #7 on: October 27, 2012, 03:41:22 PM »

Welcome to the forum!
Logged

St. Hripsimeh pray for us!
mabsoota
High Elder
*
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Coptic
Posts: 1,721


Kyrie eleison


« Reply #8 on: October 27, 2012, 03:51:37 PM »

welcome too, warda, what a cute name!
(in arabic it means 'flower')

what it means is that we don't find a fixed interpretation of something and then say
'we will always interpret verse X to mean Y for all time and in all places'.
it means there is often a deeper meaning (definitely NOT deliberately hidden),
for example in isaiah 7, there are prophecies about the exile of israel intertwined with the prophecy about Jesus;
'the virgin shall conceive and bear a Son'.
so, if someone interpreted it at different times in history, they would understand different parts of the prophecy.

as for the original question, i don't have any specific quotes, but i know that there is nothing dodgy in the Bible,
just a lot of stuff that is difficult to understand, so we need the help of the church to get it right  Smiley
Logged
Warda
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Faith: Christian
Jurisdiction: Oriental Orthodox
Posts: 2


« Reply #9 on: October 27, 2012, 04:17:15 PM »

Thank you Mabsoota,

I like your name as well.

What I understand from your post is that the Bible shouldn't be interpreted literally, at least not always. But that's not exactly what infallibility is about..
Logged
mabsoota
High Elder
*
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Coptic
Posts: 1,721


Kyrie eleison


« Reply #10 on: October 27, 2012, 05:44:44 PM »

انا مبسوطه انك تحب اسمي
(it means 'happy' in arabic)
i agree with yr point, although when defining 'infallible', the definition of 'literal' is also needed.
it is late in my time zone and i'm no expert, so i'll leave it for others to comment.
(planning to go to church tomorrow so need to sleep!)
 Smiley
Logged
Tags:
Pages: 1   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.052 seconds with 39 queries.