OrthodoxChristianity.net
July 24, 2014, 11:25:27 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Reminder: No political discussions in the public fora.  If you do not have access to the private Politics Forum, please send a PM to Fr. George.
 
   Home   Help Calendar Contact Treasury Tags Login Register  
Pages: 1   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Eutyches and his reception at the Council of Ephesus  (Read 621 times) Average Rating: 0
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Father Peter
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: British Orthodox Church within the Coptic Orthodox Patriarchate
Posts: 2,605



WWW
« on: June 13, 2012, 02:21:31 AM »

I don't know if anyone will be interested, but I have just uploaded a podcast about Eutyches, his condemnation at Constantinople and then his reception at Ephesus. It's quite a detailed history, but interesting I think, and the truth is not quite as it is usually presented.

http://orthodoxfaith.podbean.com/2012/06/12/the-reception-of-eutyches-at-ephesus/
Logged

Lord have mercy upon me a sinner
http://www.orthodoxmedway.org

My blog - http://anorthodoxpriest.blogspot.co.uk

The poster formerly known as peterfarrington
ialmisry
There's nothing John of Damascus can't answer
Hypatos
*****************
Offline Offline

Faith: جامعي Arab confesssing the Orthodox Faith of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church
Jurisdiction: Antioch (for now), but my heart belongs to Alexandria
Posts: 37,124



« Reply #1 on: June 13, 2012, 01:10:41 PM »

Amidst the problem of speaking of "Cyriline" and "Theodorean": giving the detail of Eutyches accusing Bp. Eusebius of Nestorianism, without noting Bp. Eusebius' role while still a layman in publicly initiating the opposition to Nestorius' teaching (particularly when calling him a "disturbing character" "intriguing against Pope Dioscorus as he had intriguing against Eutyches," when he was conducting himself in those matters EXACTLY as he did against Nestorius)-therefore giving serious doubt to Eutyches' accusations against Bp. Eusebius as a Nestorian (or do you say "Theodorean"), which you mention, Father, seemingly to impute Bp. Eusebius' motives-somewhat skews the presentation.  Especially as Pope St. Cyril, in his tome against Nestorius, singles out this role of Eusebius:
Quote
That we therefore think aright in affirming that God has been born according to the flesh for the salvation of all,.. God-inspired Scripture hath testified: but since to his most novel dogmas he opposes the truth and the very symbol of the Church's Faith, which the fathers once gathered together at Nicea through the illumination of the Spirit defined; he, fearing lest any should keep whole the Faith, instructed unto the Truth by their words, endeavours to calumniate it and alters the significance of the words, and dares to coin with false stamp the very force of its ideas. For while himself in the midst of the Church was using profane babblings, a certain man [i.e. Eusebius, the future bishop of Dorylaeum] of those who were of great piety and yet among the laity, but who had gathered within himself no mean learning, was moved with fervent and devout zeal and with piercing cry said that the Word Himself Who is before the ages endured a second Generation also, viz., that after the flesh and forth of a woman; the people being disturbed hereat, and the more part and wiser having honoured him with no mean praises, as pious and most full of wisdom and not imparticipate in uprightness of doctrine, the rest being mad against him, he [Nestorius] interrupting, straightway approves those whom by teaching his own he had destroyed, and whets his tongue against him [i.e. Eusebius] who could not endure his words, yea and against the holy fathers who have decreed for us the pious definition of the Faith which we have as an anchor of the soul both sure and steadfast, as it is written.

"For (said he) [i.e. Nestorius] I rejoice at beholding your zeal; but from the thing itself is a clear confutation of what has been said by the pollution of this wretched man [i.e. Eusebius]; for whereof the births are two, two sons are they, but the Church knoweth one Son Christ the Lord."
http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/cyril_against_nestorius_01_book1.htm

Then there is the problem of asserting the bishop of the Home Synod of Constantinople did not understand Pope St. Cyril: Pope St. Cyril seems to also been proven as useful a symbol as Eutyches, no matter what he taught.  It is rather odd to criticize Abp. St. Leo of Rome for not comprehending Eutyches' position after characterizing that position as "ambiguous." It is also problematic to criticize Abp. St. Flavian and Bp. Eusebius preparing to depose Eutyches, while praising Pope St. Cyril for doing the same thing at the Ecumenical Council of  Ephesus, particularly as Eutyches was eventually anathematized by the non-Chalcedonians (hence the editing of the OO account of the Acts of Ephesus II: The criticism of the Greek text of Chalcedon, particularly as the Latin preserves what is criticized, is rather one sided given that the only OO version of Ephesus II omits the restoration of Eutyches in toto.  Particularly when the Acts of Chalcedon are being condemned as being "edited to support a certain view").

It poses problems to claim that Abp. St. Flavian and Bp. Eusebius were deposed by Pope Dioscorus for Faith reasons independent of Eutyches' teachings, particularly when one is trying to exonerate Pope Dioscorus by condemning Abp. St. Flavian and Bp. Eusebius for "perverting the Faith" (or whatever phrase the podcast used).  That would be very convenient from the OO view, but that is not what happened at Ephesus II, where neither the Faith at stake nor Abp. Flavian and Eusebius on trial, as is shown by comparing the the OO and EO recensions of the Acts of Ephesus II.

Somewhere here I got on pulling the quotes together from the various councils on Eutyches' claims on technicalities to avoid addressing the trial on the merits.  I'll have to look if I finished and posted, or if they are buried in my drafts folder.



 
Logged

Question a friend, perhaps he did not do it; but if he did anything so that he may do it no more.
A hasty quarrel kindles fire,
and urgent strife sheds blood.
If you blow on a spark, it will glow;
if you spit on it, it will be put out;
                           and both come out of your mouth
Father Peter
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: British Orthodox Church within the Coptic Orthodox Patriarchate
Posts: 2,605



WWW
« Reply #2 on: June 13, 2012, 01:28:18 PM »

You are entitled to your opinions, but I do not agree with them.

The records of the Home Synod itself clearly indicates that Flavian and Eusebius were seeking to exclude the one nature language of St Cyril. This was the main issue.

I think that you fail to note that people's opinions and view change over the passage of time.

I don't really want to debate it here though, as I become less convinced that the open internet is the proper forum for doing anything positive. If you disagree then I guess you disagree.

Nestorius was never the real problem. It was always Theodore. Ibas and Theodoret could condemn Nestorius while never giving up their heterodox Theodorean Christology. The fact that someone condemns Nestorius means little on its own. I do impute Eusebius' motives, they are fairly obvious.
Logged

Lord have mercy upon me a sinner
http://www.orthodoxmedway.org

My blog - http://anorthodoxpriest.blogspot.co.uk

The poster formerly known as peterfarrington
HabteSelassie
Ises and I-ity
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Oriental Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church
Posts: 3,332



« Reply #3 on: June 13, 2012, 01:54:32 PM »

Greetings in that Divine and Most Precious Name of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ!

I've always felt that Eutychus' error was not in his own theology, because clearly he was exonerated for the exaggerated misunderstanding which led to his initial excommunication. His real error was not controlling the monks and teachers at his monastery who were spreading around the contagion heresy we call Eutychianism.  Realistically, it seems his students were the ones in error, and they were vehement about their erroneous interpretations, and this caused all the hoopla.  The Fathers who seemed to know Euthychus personally, clearly didn't feel as strongly against him as those who had fed on the hearsay.  I don't have the time, but I am ridiculously interested in listening to this podcast, thank you Father Peter Smiley

stay blessed,
habte selassie
Logged

"Yet stand aloof from stupid questionings and geneologies and strifes and fightings about law, for they are without benefit and vain." Titus 3:10
HabteSelassie
Ises and I-ity
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Oriental Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church
Posts: 3,332



« Reply #4 on: June 13, 2012, 04:55:11 PM »

Greetings in that Divine and Most Precious Name of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ!

Father, this is a brilliant, but dense podcast.  I know it is stretching it a bit, but perhaps you could compile some kind of related transcript to at least some of this information? It is quite valuable along with other articles about Eutychus which you've written in the past Smiley

stay blessed,
habte selassie
Logged

"Yet stand aloof from stupid questionings and geneologies and strifes and fightings about law, for they are without benefit and vain." Titus 3:10
Father Peter
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: British Orthodox Church within the Coptic Orthodox Patriarchate
Posts: 2,605



WWW
« Reply #5 on: June 13, 2012, 05:04:14 PM »

You will find this, and some of my other podcasts, in my book Orthodox Christology, which you can obtain here..

http://www.lulu.com/shop/father-peter-farrington/orthodox-christology/paperback/product-10969273.html
Logged

Lord have mercy upon me a sinner
http://www.orthodoxmedway.org

My blog - http://anorthodoxpriest.blogspot.co.uk

The poster formerly known as peterfarrington
HabteSelassie
Ises and I-ity
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Oriental Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church
Posts: 3,332



« Reply #6 on: June 13, 2012, 05:06:59 PM »

Greetings in that Divine and Most Precious Name of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ!

You will find this, and some of my other podcasts, in my book Orthodox Christology, which you can obtain here..

http://www.lulu.com/shop/father-peter-farrington/orthodox-christology/paperback/product-10969273.html

Seek and ye shall find Smiley

I had read your articles before ever coming to OC.net, and while we've had some disagreements in the past here on the forum, I always treasure your knowledge of obscure Christological history while staying level headed and not getting polemically excited.

stay blessed,
habte selassie
Logged

"Yet stand aloof from stupid questionings and geneologies and strifes and fightings about law, for they are without benefit and vain." Titus 3:10
Father Peter
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: British Orthodox Church within the Coptic Orthodox Patriarchate
Posts: 2,605



WWW
« Reply #7 on: June 13, 2012, 05:09:13 PM »

Be assured that I am getting too addle brained to be able to remember who I disagree with on forums like this. Every day is a new one. The Lord bless you.
Logged

Lord have mercy upon me a sinner
http://www.orthodoxmedway.org

My blog - http://anorthodoxpriest.blogspot.co.uk

The poster formerly known as peterfarrington
Father Peter
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: British Orthodox Church within the Coptic Orthodox Patriarchate
Posts: 2,605



WWW
« Reply #8 on: June 13, 2012, 05:11:03 PM »

Oh, and if you look back before I rejoined OCnet, I was a major participant in the great Chalcedon Flame Wars, especially against Linus7. I have learned only recently to try to step back from polemics and arguments, and still do not always succeed.
Logged

Lord have mercy upon me a sinner
http://www.orthodoxmedway.org

My blog - http://anorthodoxpriest.blogspot.co.uk

The poster formerly known as peterfarrington
HabteSelassie
Ises and I-ity
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Oriental Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church
Posts: 3,332



« Reply #9 on: June 13, 2012, 05:17:42 PM »

Greetings in that Divine and Most Precious Name of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ!

Oh, and if you look back before I rejoined OCnet, I was a major participant in the great Chalcedon Flame Wars, especially against Linus7. I have learned only recently to try to step back from polemics and arguments, and still do not always succeed.

Practice makes perfect Smiley

stay blessed,
habte selassie
Logged

"Yet stand aloof from stupid questionings and geneologies and strifes and fightings about law, for they are without benefit and vain." Titus 3:10
Hiwot
Christ is Risen!
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church
Posts: 1,959


Job 19:25-27


« Reply #10 on: June 14, 2012, 09:29:55 AM »

Dear Father, I loved that book very enlightening.  Thank you!
Logged

To God be the Glory in all things! Amen!

Only pray for me, that God would give me both inward and outward strength, that I may not only speak, but truly will; and that I may not merely be called a Christian, but really be found to be one. St.Ignatius of Antioch.Epistle to the Romans.
Salpy
Moderator
Toumarches
*****
Online Online

Faith: Oriental Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Armenian Church
Posts: 12,348


Pray for the Christians of Iraq and Syria.


« Reply #11 on: June 14, 2012, 08:27:15 PM »

A polemical post was split off and put in the private forum, pursuant to forum rules:

http://www.orthodoxchristianity.net/forum/index.php/topic,45291.msg763628.html#top


I'm locking the thread to prevent anymore polemics.  If someone wants to engage in yet another argument about Eutyches, he or she may post about it there.  If anyone wants to join the private forum, they need to pm Fr. George to be admitted.


Logged

Tags: Eutyches Christology sermon online 
Pages: 1   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.064 seconds with 39 queries.