Peter J
Formerly PJ
Taxiarches
 Offline
Faith: Melkite (inquirer into Orthodoxy)
Posts: 4,926
|
 |
« on: May 20, 2012, 07:39:12 AM » |
|
I know we've had a number of threads about married EC priests (or lack thereof  ) in the canonical territory of the LC Church. This thread is for considering the flip-side: What about LC priests living in the canonical territory of an EC Church? Are they celibate? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better. I therefore intend to oppose the effort to increase America’s debt limit."
- Barack Obama
|
|
|
|
ialmisry
|
|
« Reply #1 on: May 20, 2012, 09:37:41 AM » |
|
I know we've had a number of threads about married EC priests (or lack thereof ) in the canonical territory of the LC Church. This thread is for considering the flip-side: What about LC priests living in the canonical territory of an EC Church? Are they celibate? Yes, somewhere here I've brought that up. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Question a friend, perhaps he did not do it; but if he did anything so that he may do it no more.
A hasty quarrel kindles fire,
and urgent strife sheds blood.
If you blow on a spark, it will glow;
if you spit on it, it will be put out;
and both come out of your mouth
|
|
|
Michał Kalina
proud Podlachian Belarusian parajournalistic engineer in spe
Section Moderator
Hypatos
Offline
Faith: Christian
Jurisdiction: Diocese of Białystok and Gdańsk / Diocese of Warsaw and Bielsk Podlaski
Posts: 15,369
OC.net's trickster
|
|
« Reply #2 on: May 20, 2012, 10:59:32 AM » |
|
This thread is for considering the flip-side: What about LC priests living in the canonical territory of an EC Church? Are they celibate?
You mean, where? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
formerly known as mikeDespite being a Polish citizen I am not a Pole.  Long live Belarus! "It's my constitutional right!" |
|
|
|
Alpo
|
|
« Reply #3 on: May 20, 2012, 02:12:11 PM » |
|
I could understand enforcing clercal celibacy to the Eastern Catholic clergy in the West if they allowed Married Latin clergy in the East. Both are understandable positions but I don't think they can coexist.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Just a little reminder: this forum is not called OrthodoxChristianityUSA.net   |
|
|
Peter J
Formerly PJ
Taxiarches
Offline
Faith: Melkite (inquirer into Orthodoxy)
Posts: 4,926
|
|
« Reply #4 on: May 20, 2012, 08:33:27 PM » |
|
This thread is for considering the flip-side: What about LC priests living in the canonical territory of an EC Church? Are they celibate?
You mean, where? E.g. Ukraine. Many other places, but I won't try to give a comprehensive list. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better. I therefore intend to oppose the effort to increase America’s debt limit."
- Barack Obama
|
|
|
TheMathematician
Banished and Disgraced
Sr. Member
 Online
Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: ROCOR/Serbian
Posts: 900
Formerly known as Montalo
|
|
« Reply #5 on: May 20, 2012, 10:59:47 PM » |
|
I know we've had a number of threads about married EC priests (or lack thereof ) in the canonical territory of the LC Church. This thread is for considering the flip-side: What about LC priests living in the canonical territory of an EC Church? Are they celibate? there is no such thing an EC canonical territory, whatsoever. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
LakaYaRabb
Member
Offline
Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Orthodox Church in America
Posts: 189
|
|
« Reply #6 on: May 20, 2012, 11:50:31 PM » |
|
Actually, incorrect. See Ethiopian Catholic Church and the canonical territorial status thereof...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
LakaYaRabb
Member
Offline
Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Orthodox Church in America
Posts: 189
|
|
« Reply #7 on: May 20, 2012, 11:52:31 PM » |
|
In 1995, two new eparchies, Barentu and Keren, were established in Eritrea,[3] and the Latin Rite apostolic vicariate was abolished. Eritrea thus became the only country where all Catholics, whatever their personal liturgical rite, belong to an Eastern Catholic jurisdiction. See wikipedia for details |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
LakaYaRabb
Member
Offline
Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Orthodox Church in America
Posts: 189
|
|
« Reply #8 on: May 20, 2012, 11:55:42 PM » |
|
I know we've had a number of threads about married EC priests (or lack thereof ) in the canonical territory of the LC Church. This thread is for considering the flip-side: What about LC priests living in the canonical territory of an EC Church? Are they celibate? Mandatory celibacy is the discipline for Roman Catholicism everywhere, with limited and very restricted norms established for exceptions. Geography or geographical jurisdiction play no part in the application of this discipline. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Peter J
Formerly PJ
Taxiarches
Offline
Faith: Melkite (inquirer into Orthodoxy)
Posts: 4,926
|
|
« Reply #9 on: May 21, 2012, 07:44:18 AM » |
|
I know we've had a number of threads about married EC priests (or lack thereof ) in the canonical territory of the LC Church. This thread is for considering the flip-side: What about LC priests living in the canonical territory of an EC Church? Are they celibate? there is no such thing an EC canonical territory, whatsoever. Actually, not only there is such a thing, but the basis for not allowing married EC priests in places like the US is that they are "outside their canonical territory". |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better. I therefore intend to oppose the effort to increase America’s debt limit."
- Barack Obama
|
|
|
|
ialmisry
|
|
« Reply #10 on: May 21, 2012, 08:40:35 AM » |
|
I know we've had a number of threads about married EC priests (or lack thereof ) in the canonical territory of the LC Church. This thread is for considering the flip-side: What about LC priests living in the canonical territory of an EC Church? Are they celibate? there is no such thing an EC canonical territory, whatsoever. Actually, not only there is such a thing, but the basis for not allowing married EC priests in places like the US is that they are "outside their canonical territory". "acceptable field of operations" is more like it. I'd have to look, but I don't recall canonical territory being defined in the Codex Canonum Ecclesiarum Orientalium. The Italo-Albanians are in their own "canonical territory." How's their stand on married clergy? Like the Romanians in Italy? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Question a friend, perhaps he did not do it; but if he did anything so that he may do it no more.
A hasty quarrel kindles fire,
and urgent strife sheds blood.
If you blow on a spark, it will glow;
if you spit on it, it will be put out;
and both come out of your mouth
|
|
|
Michał Kalina
proud Podlachian Belarusian parajournalistic engineer in spe
Section Moderator
Hypatos
Offline
Faith: Christian
Jurisdiction: Diocese of Białystok and Gdańsk / Diocese of Warsaw and Bielsk Podlaski
Posts: 15,369
OC.net's trickster
|
|
« Reply #11 on: May 21, 2012, 01:03:07 PM » |
|
In 1995, two new eparchies, Barentu and Keren, were established in Eritrea,[3] and the Latin Rite apostolic vicariate was abolished. Eritrea thus became the only country where all Catholics, whatever their personal liturgical rite, belong to an Eastern Catholic jurisdiction. See wikipedia for details I've read somewhere that the whole Ethipiian Catholic Church adopted mandatory celibacy. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
formerly known as mikeDespite being a Polish citizen I am not a Pole. Long live Belarus! "It's my constitutional right!" |
|
|
|
primuspilus
|
|
« Reply #12 on: May 21, 2012, 01:51:27 PM » |
|
Actually, not only there is such a thing, but the basis for not allowing married EC priests in places like the US is that they are "outside their canonical territory and Actually, incorrect. See Ethiopian Catholic Church and the canonical territorial status thereof The canonical territory of these churches is pretty easy to define:  PP |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I confidently affirm that whoever calls himself Universal Bishop is the precursor of Antichrist"
Gregory the Great
|
|
|
|
Deacon Lance
|
|
« Reply #13 on: May 21, 2012, 09:15:21 PM » |
|
I'd have to look, but I don't recall canonical territory being defined in the Codex Canonum Ecclesiarum Orientalium. The Italo-Albanians are in their own "canonical territory." How's their stand on married clergy? Like the Romanians in Italy?
Canons 146-150. The Italo-Albanians have always had a married priesthhood which makes the Italian position on the Romanians even more ridiculous. The Italo-Albanian Eparchies are also territorial in that the have charge of the Latin parishes within their district as well as their own. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
My cromulent posts embiggen this forum.
|
|
|
|
Deacon Lance
|
|
« Reply #14 on: May 21, 2012, 09:26:16 PM » |
|
I've read somewhere that the whole Ethipiian Catholic Church adopted mandatory celibacy.
No the Syro-Malabars and Syro-Malankars adopted mandatory celibacy for the priesthood. The Copts, Ethiopians, and Syriacs, adopted prefered celibacy in that celibacy is considered the norm but the patriarch/metropolitan may grant dispensations. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
My cromulent posts embiggen this forum.
|
|
|
Michał Kalina
proud Podlachian Belarusian parajournalistic engineer in spe
Section Moderator
Hypatos
Offline
Faith: Christian
Jurisdiction: Diocese of Białystok and Gdańsk / Diocese of Warsaw and Bielsk Podlaski
Posts: 15,369
OC.net's trickster
|
|
« Reply #15 on: May 22, 2012, 04:29:48 AM » |
|
The Copts, Ethiopians, and Syriacs, adopted prefered celibacy in that celibacy is considered the norm but the patriarch/metropolitan may grant dispensations.
Like in the Roman Rite? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
formerly known as mikeDespite being a Polish citizen I am not a Pole. Long live Belarus! "It's my constitutional right!" |
|
|
Peter J
Formerly PJ
Taxiarches
Offline
Faith: Melkite (inquirer into Orthodoxy)
Posts: 4,926
|
|
« Reply #16 on: May 22, 2012, 07:03:17 AM » |
|
The Copts, Ethiopians, and Syriacs, adopted prefered celibacy in that celibacy is considered the norm but the patriarch/metropolitan may grant dispensations.
Like in the Roman Rite? In a way, although if there's one thing I've heard about a million times it's that having married priests "isn't the tradition" in the Latin Church. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better. I therefore intend to oppose the effort to increase America’s debt limit."
- Barack Obama
|
|
|
JoeS2
Member
Offline
Faith: Orthodox Catholic by choice
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 324
St. Mark Defender of the true Faith
|
|
« Reply #17 on: May 22, 2012, 11:21:43 AM » |
|
I know we've had a number of threads about married EC priests (or lack thereof ) in the canonical territory of the LC Church. This thread is for considering the flip-side: What about LC priests living in the canonical territory of an EC Church? Are they celibate? Although limited in numbers, the RCC have accepted ordained ministers with families to the priesthood and have in some cases assigned parishes to such families. Most have been assigned administrative roles in the RCC however. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: May 22, 2012, 11:22:37 AM by JoeS2 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Deacon Lance
|
|
« Reply #18 on: May 22, 2012, 04:25:48 PM » |
|
The Copts, Ethiopians, and Syriacs, adopted prefered celibacy in that celibacy is considered the norm but the patriarch/metropolitan may grant dispensations.
Like in the Roman Rite? No, because in the Latin Church dispensations are considered an extraordinary exception, must be given by the Pope and are only given to converting Protestant clergy. Among the Copts, Syriacs, and Ethiopians the dispensation is granted by the patriarch/metropolitan for men of teir own Church and they are common. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
My cromulent posts embiggen this forum.
|
|
|
Peter J
Formerly PJ
Taxiarches
Offline
Faith: Melkite (inquirer into Orthodoxy)
Posts: 4,926
|
|
« Reply #19 on: May 26, 2012, 09:32:35 AM » |
|
The Copts, Ethiopians, and Syriacs, adopted prefered celibacy in that celibacy is considered the norm but the patriarch/metropolitan may grant dispensations.
Like in the Roman Rite? No, because in the Latin Church dispensations are considered an extraordinary exception, must be given by the Pope and are only given to converting Protestant clergy. But I suspect Michał's point was that the Pope is the Latin Church's patriarch. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better. I therefore intend to oppose the effort to increase America’s debt limit."
- Barack Obama
|
|
|
|
Deacon Lance
|
|
« Reply #20 on: May 26, 2012, 09:42:17 AM » |
|
I thought he meant they must ask the dispensation of Rome rather than their own patriarch.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
My cromulent posts embiggen this forum.
|
|
|
|
ialmisry
|
|
« Reply #21 on: May 26, 2012, 11:15:56 AM » |
|
I know we've had a number of threads about married EC priests (or lack thereof ) in the canonical territory of the LC Church. This thread is for considering the flip-side: What about LC priests living in the canonical territory of an EC Church? Are they celibate? Although limited in numbers, the RCC have accepted ordained ministers with families to the priesthood and have in some cases assigned parishes to such families. That is only outside of "the canonical territory of an EC Church," e.g. the US or Britain. Not in Eastern Europe nor the Middle East. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Question a friend, perhaps he did not do it; but if he did anything so that he may do it no more.
A hasty quarrel kindles fire,
and urgent strife sheds blood.
If you blow on a spark, it will glow;
if you spit on it, it will be put out;
and both come out of your mouth
|
|
|
|
