OrthodoxChristianity.net
May 20, 2013, 12:56:49 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: If you don't like the Lent theme or it's hard for you to read posts with it, feel free to revert back to the old theme in your profile on the left menu "Look and Layout Preferences."
 
   Home   Help Calendar Contact Treasury Tags Login Register  
Pages: 1   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Has the 'real Ratzinger' come out to play?  (Read 519 times) Average Rating: 0
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Jetavan
Most Humble Servant of Pan-Vespuccian and Holocenic Hominids
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Traditio Christiana (Proto-Catholic)
Jurisdiction: Dixie
Posts: 4,900


Barlaam and Josaphat


WWW
« on: April 29, 2012, 09:08:47 PM »

Quote
ROME -- When Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger was elected to the papacy in April 2005, the popular forecast called for stormy weather ahead. This was, after all, the Vatican enforcer who had been leading a “smack-down on heresy since 1981”, in the words of T-shirts and coffee mugs marketed by a Ratzinger fan club. His rise elicited dread in some quarters and joy in others, but virtually everyone agreed big things were in the works.

During most of the past seven years, however, that anticipated upheaval has seemed a lot like the dog that didn’t bark. Back in February 2006, the late Fr. Richard John Neuhaus famously voiced “palpable unease” among those most elated by Ratzinger’s election, and that disappointment endured in a swath of Catholic opinion which had begun to despair that the pope would ever impose order.

Of late, however, many observers believe the “real Ratzinger” has finally come out to play.
....
What all this suggests is that if there’s indeed a purge unfolding, it will likely be sporadic and uneven, driven more by some Vatican departments, and by some local bishops or religious orders, than others.
....
Yet with all those cautions on the record, the bottom line on April 2012 remains: The “German Shepherd”, it would seem, still has some bite.
It seems that the Popes give more leeway to Eastern Catholics, than to Latin Catholics.
« Last Edit: April 29, 2012, 09:10:43 PM by Jetavan » Logged

If you will, you can become all flame.
Extra caritatem nulla salus.
In order to become whole, take the "I" out of "holiness".
I'm not a witch.
Ἄνω σχῶμεν τὰς καρδίας
"Those who say religion has nothing to do with politics do not know what religion is." -- Mohandas Gandhi
Y dduw bo'r diolch.
Ortho_cat
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: AOCA-DWMA
Posts: 5,392



« Reply #1 on: April 29, 2012, 09:10:44 PM »

i think once he finally got in power he realized that it was more important not to "rock the boat".
Logged
Peter J
Formerly PJ
Taxiarches
*
Offline Offline

Faith: Melkite (inquirer into Orthodoxy)
Posts: 4,926



« Reply #2 on: April 30, 2012, 11:02:32 AM »

It seems that the Popes give more leeway to Eastern Catholics, than to Latin Catholics.

Yes and no. The Pope is also the Patriarch of the Latin Church, so that means he has a lot of say in that particular Church. The thing is, not everyone agrees that e.g. North American should be part of the Latin Church. Ditto for South America, Australia, and Africa.
Logged

"Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better. I therefore intend to oppose the effort to increase America’s debt limit."
- Barack Obama
J Michael
Older than dirt; dumber than a box of rocks; colossally ignorant; a little crazy ;-)
Merarches
***********
Online Online

Faith: Byzantine Catholic
Posts: 5,573


Lord, have mercy!


« Reply #3 on: April 30, 2012, 11:28:18 AM »

It seems that the Popes give more leeway to Eastern Catholics, than to Latin Catholics.

Yes and no. The Pope is also the Patriarch of the Latin Church, so that means he has a lot of say in that particular Church. The thing is, not everyone agrees that e.g. North American should be part of the Latin Church. Ditto for South America, Australia, and Africa.

Not sure what you mean by that.  Why wouldn't they be part of the "Latin Church"?  Are there those who suggest that these places should have their own patriarchates?
Logged

"Right is right even if no one is doing it; wrong is wrong even if everyone is doing it."
— St. Augustine of Hippo
podkarpatska
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: ACROD
Posts: 5,048


SS Cyril and Methodius Church, Mercer, PA


WWW
« Reply #4 on: April 30, 2012, 11:34:19 AM »

Didn't the Pope "retire" the title 'Patriarch of the West' and wasn't that met with controversy in the Orthodox world back in 2006? http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/0601225.htm
Logged
Peter J
Formerly PJ
Taxiarches
*
Offline Offline

Faith: Melkite (inquirer into Orthodoxy)
Posts: 4,926



« Reply #5 on: April 30, 2012, 11:49:52 AM »

Why wouldn't they be part of the "Latin Church"? 

That's a good question, but before attempting a refutation, I'd need to know what argument(s) I'm refuting.
Logged

"Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better. I therefore intend to oppose the effort to increase America’s debt limit."
- Barack Obama
J Michael
Older than dirt; dumber than a box of rocks; colossally ignorant; a little crazy ;-)
Merarches
***********
Online Online

Faith: Byzantine Catholic
Posts: 5,573


Lord, have mercy!


« Reply #6 on: April 30, 2012, 11:52:06 AM »

Why wouldn't they be part of the "Latin Church"? 

That's a good question, but before attempting a refutation, I'd need to know what argument(s) I'm refuting.

I'm not arguing anything.  I'm asking because I don't know and I wasn't sure what you meant in your original post here.
Logged

"Right is right even if no one is doing it; wrong is wrong even if everyone is doing it."
— St. Augustine of Hippo
Papist
Patriarch of Pontification
Moderated
Stratopedarches
**************
Offline Offline

Faith: Catholic
Jurisdiction: Latin Church: Archdiocese of Santa Fe
Posts: 10,652


Truth, Justice, and the American Way


« Reply #7 on: April 30, 2012, 12:03:02 PM »

The Pope can't stop being what he is, and the Patriarch of the West is what he is. Smiley I think he removed it from the official list, because in our current situation, it doesn't have as much meaning as it has had in other historical circumstances.
Logged

"The only-begotten Son of God, wanting us to be partakers of his divinity, assumed our human nature so that, having become man, he might make men gods." - St. Thomas Aquinas
Peter J
Formerly PJ
Taxiarches
*
Offline Offline

Faith: Melkite (inquirer into Orthodoxy)
Posts: 4,926



« Reply #8 on: April 30, 2012, 12:10:19 PM »

The Pope can't stop being what he is, and the Patriarch of the West is what he is. Smiley I think he removed it from the official list, because in our current situation, it doesn't have as much meaning as it has had in other historical circumstances.

As I understand it, the removal of that title from the "yearbook" wasn't overly significant in and of itself, since it has only been in the yearbook in recent centuries. However, the explanation for that removal made it sound like that title is been downplayed/walked-away-from in general.
Logged

"Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better. I therefore intend to oppose the effort to increase America’s debt limit."
- Barack Obama
Papist
Patriarch of Pontification
Moderated
Stratopedarches
**************
Offline Offline

Faith: Catholic
Jurisdiction: Latin Church: Archdiocese of Santa Fe
Posts: 10,652


Truth, Justice, and the American Way


« Reply #9 on: April 30, 2012, 12:19:11 PM »

The Pope can't stop being what he is, and the Patriarch of the West is what he is. Smiley I think he removed it from the official list, because in our current situation, it doesn't have as much meaning as it has had in other historical circumstances.

As I understand it, the removal of that title from the "yearbook" wasn't overly significant in and of itself, since it has only been in the yearbook in recent centuries. However, the explanation for that removal made it sound like that title is been downplayed/walked-away-from in general.
Agreed.
Logged

"The only-begotten Son of God, wanting us to be partakers of his divinity, assumed our human nature so that, having become man, he might make men gods." - St. Thomas Aquinas
Ortho_cat
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: AOCA-DWMA
Posts: 5,392



« Reply #10 on: April 30, 2012, 01:45:22 PM »

Does he still go by the title "Patriarch of Rome"?
Logged
sheenj
Sr. Member
****
Online Online

Faith: Oriental Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Indian/Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church
Posts: 990


St. Gregorios of Parumala, pray for us...


« Reply #11 on: April 30, 2012, 02:00:08 PM »

Does he still go by the title "Patriarch of Rome"?
I think it's the Bishop of Rome but yeah, that's in his title.
Logged
J Michael
Older than dirt; dumber than a box of rocks; colossally ignorant; a little crazy ;-)
Merarches
***********
Online Online

Faith: Byzantine Catholic
Posts: 5,573


Lord, have mercy!


« Reply #12 on: April 30, 2012, 02:01:31 PM »

Does he still go by the title "Patriarch of Rome"?

I don't think so.  Bishop of Rome, yes, however.
Logged

"Right is right even if no one is doing it; wrong is wrong even if everyone is doing it."
— St. Augustine of Hippo
biro
Ursus maritimus
Site Supporter
Stratopedarches
*****
Online Online

Faith: Raised Roman Catholic; now attend GOA
Jurisdiction: Metropolis of Atlanta
Posts: 9,602


Και κλήρονομον δείξον με, ζωής της αιωνίου

fleem
WWW
« Reply #13 on: April 30, 2012, 02:14:56 PM »

I read some of his stuff from back when he was a cardinal. He doesn't seem to have changed much.
Logged

phthalyl.podomatic.com

the-cornet.blogspot.com
Peter J
Formerly PJ
Taxiarches
*
Offline Offline

Faith: Melkite (inquirer into Orthodoxy)
Posts: 4,926



« Reply #14 on: April 30, 2012, 02:28:18 PM »

Does he still go by the title "Patriarch of Rome"?

If you mean, is it in the yearbook (Annuario Pontificio), then I'm fairly certain the answer is no.
Logged

"Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better. I therefore intend to oppose the effort to increase America’s debt limit."
- Barack Obama
Ortho_cat
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: AOCA-DWMA
Posts: 5,392



« Reply #15 on: April 30, 2012, 02:31:00 PM »

Does he still go by the title "Patriarch of Rome"?

I don't think so.  Bishop of Rome, yes, however.

Oh ok. A Patriarch is nothing more than just a fancy bishop, anways.
Logged
biro
Ursus maritimus
Site Supporter
Stratopedarches
*****
Online Online

Faith: Raised Roman Catholic; now attend GOA
Jurisdiction: Metropolis of Atlanta
Posts: 9,602


Και κλήρονομον δείξον με, ζωής της αιωνίου

fleem
WWW
« Reply #16 on: April 30, 2012, 02:36:50 PM »

Does he still go by the title "Patriarch of Rome"?

I don't think so.  Bishop of Rome, yes, however.

Oh ok. A Patriarch is nothing more than just a fancy bishop, anways.

Shh, don't tell, but in the RCC, a Pope is essentially the highest archbishop. Cardinals are that subset of archbishops who can elect and advise a Pope. But they don't have more territory.
Logged

phthalyl.podomatic.com

the-cornet.blogspot.com
Tags:
Pages: 1   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.078 seconds with 45 queries.