Author Topic: Darwin Foes Add Warming to Targets  (Read 9275 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline PeterTheAleut

  • The Right Blowhard Peter the Furtive of Yetts O'Muckhart
  • Hypatos
  • *****************
  • Posts: 37,280
  • Lord, have mercy on the Christians in Mosul!
  • Faith: Orthodox Christian
  • Jurisdiction: Orthodox Church in America
Re: Darwin Foes Add Warming to Targets
« Reply #45 on: March 12, 2012, 09:01:09 AM »
Kentucky, people. Kentucky . . .

What about Kentucky?

You sure you ain't Eliza?
Can you please just answer the question? What about Kentucky?


Okay, then. I've never known you to answer questions of your drive-bys before, so why should you have to start now? ;)
« Last Edit: March 12, 2012, 09:01:46 AM by PeterTheAleut »
Not all who wander are lost.

Offline Jason.Wike

  • guru
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,046
Re: Darwin Foes Add Warming to Targets
« Reply #46 on: March 12, 2012, 09:52:05 AM »
It's not critical thinking. In both cases, one side presents evidence before their peers, and the other side says anything they can't understand must be stupid. We already have this side of the issue from the teenagers; why do we need to give it creedence by citing adults who still think this way?

The globabl warming sketpics have been presenting evidence for as long as the issue has been brought up. They have been labeled anti-science unfairly, by  the media, certain NGOs, and the pro-warming scientists.  They have been demonized and ridiculed rather than engaged and debated.  Every time a skeptic demands to debate Al Gore, he refuses or invents some reason as to why his schedule cannot allow him to do so. 

Al Gore is really irrelevant to global warming. I know a lot of folks think he "invented" the idea or something but that is silly... He's not a scientist and has nothing to do with the theory. It is like expecting Brad Pitt to give a public debate about the sociology behind China invading Tibet and their treatment of Tibetans.