OrthodoxChristianity.net
October 20, 2014, 09:27:56 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Reminder: No political discussions in the public fora.  If you do not have access to the private Politics Forum, please send a PM to Fr. George.
 
   Home   Help Calendar Contact Treasury Tags Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2  All   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: American Orthodox Church parish to be opened in California  (Read 3479 times) Average Rating: 0
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
dzheremi
No longer posting here.
Warned
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Coptic
Posts: 4,383


« Reply #45 on: March 08, 2012, 01:54:38 PM »

Also, I must say I am concerned by the Coptic Church creating ethnic British, French and now American parishes... are the regular Coptic parishes only for Egyptians? I still prefer to think that an Orthodox parish, whether EO or OO, should be open to people of all backgrounds.

This thought has occurred to me, as well. I think that further splintering of Orthodoxy alongside so-called "ethnic lines" (a weird notion in America, as "American" is not an ethnicity) isn't good. If you don't have to be Egyptian to be Orthodox (and you don't), then it follows that you shouldn't have to be American to be Orthodox, either. Of course, you still are American (or British, or Chinese, or Ethiopian, or whatever) by virtue of your history, but if you are from a place without a long Orthodox history, you have to take some cues from some other place that already has that history, right? So the OCA, for instance, while being mostly converts, keeps the Byzantine praxis of its mother church. But I suppose that because of the greater relative difference between the cultures of Egypt and America (or Egypt and Britain, or Egypt and France) than those of America and Eastern Europe (which, while being very different, is still ultimately Europe after all), this is for some reason unpalatable in the case of the Coptic church in America. Not to me, so much, since I already spoke some Arabic and ate beans before I joined the church (Grin), but for others. But then what? Because they are uncomfortable with Coptic hymnody, it should be acceptable to have missionary parishes where the sermons are based on Protestant concepts and some meetings where they sing pop evangelical/Protestant songs? I don't think that's acceptable at all. That's sort of seceding America to those very unorthodox ideas just because we don't have the history of Roman Orthodox chant like Father Peter says existed in Britain, and Coptic spirituality is largely foreign to us. Well, it's never going to stop being foreign if instead we feed the people something else in the name of Americanism. I don't want things like "the Purpose Driven Life" and Protestant hymns to be identified with American Orthodoxy, either EO or OO. Not because I hate America or anything (I love it; it's where I keep all my stuff), but because those things aren't Orthodox to begin with.

But what is the alternative, in such a country full of immigrants? Respectfully, I don't think those who are so gung-ho for more missionary parishes have really thought about that. Obviously, it would be bad and untenable for there to be a "Latin-American Coptic Orthodox Church" with Mozarabic chant, a "French-American Coptic Orthodox Church" with Galician chant, an "Italian-American Coptic Orthodox Chant" with Ambrosian/Milanese chant, etc. Untenable and unnecessary, I would think, as many Americans are n-th generation and don't identify with their ancestral homelands in the first place. What's out there for them, and moreover, since all of these concessions really do seem to boil down to "but the white people don't/won't like our chant", what on earth would distinctly American Orthodox chant be like, if Coptic chant is so unacceptable?

I hate to put it so bluntly, but I think if we let American culture determine the acceptable expression of Orthodoxy based on what the majority of Americans are comfortable with, we're likely to end up with something that isn't actually Orthodox at all, even if we put "Coptic" or some other modifier in front of it. I am a big fan of being changed by the church and pray for it every day. I don't see why this can't also be the goal of the church overall in its action within the lands of immigration with regard to the cultures of those lands: Accommodate what is conducive to fostering Orthodoxy among the native population, but do not let their likes and dislikes (which are malleable anyway; I know plenty of people who thought they'd hate Ethiopian food until I forced them to come to the local Ethiopian restaurant with me...heh) determine its character. Orthodoxy, after all, comes first, and that should mean no Protestant hymns at meetings, no Protestant books in sermons, etc. You have to turn them away from such things, not embrace them just to get more people to show up.

</rant>
Logged

Father Peter
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: British Orthodox Church within the Coptic Orthodox Patriarchate
Posts: 2,654



WWW
« Reply #46 on: March 08, 2012, 02:15:47 PM »

I think you miss the point that Orthodoxy has always been enculturated. That is why there is a Coptic Orthodox Church.

I also think that you are being too negative, and a little unfair, about what an American Orthodox Church does look like and should look like. Who is suggesting that it should encompass Purpose Driven Life and Evangelical songs?

If I am British, as I am, then why should I not worship God as an Orthodox Christian in my own language, and with appropriate music? This has been the universal practice of Orthodoxy, EXCEPT when it comes to the West in modern times. Orthodoxy is properly respectful of culture. I am not sure why you think that is a problem?

If there is a Coptic Orthodox Church then there should be an American Orthodox Church. The problem is when a Church from one culture insists that its language and music must be privileged, when in fact this was not what happened in its own history. Why does the Coptic Orthodox Church not use Armenian Chant, or vice-versa? Why then should Western Orthodox not be able to use Western music?

Once again, it is unfair to suggest that enculturation must lead to evangelicalism. It is unfair to suggest that there should be a Church culture for every minority culture in the US. But there could very reasonably be a Spanish speaking community, and an English speaking community. I am not sure why the fact that clearly you appreciate Coptic chant and Arabic, which is a blessing to you, means that there is something wrong with the majority of Western folk who don't.

I am not sure why you speak as if it was not absolutely clear that there is a tradition of Orthodox Chant in the West? Why speak as if it is something I have made up? Why speak as if every Orthodox group that is trying to engage with English speaking people is doing something wrong? I don't want anyone in my congregation to have to learn Coptic or Arabic to be Orthodox, am I an evangelical or deficient in some other way?

Orthodoxy should be open to people of all backgrounds. In my own British Orthodox congregation this is the case. I have had English, Egyptian, Syrian, Ethiopian, Eritrean, Indian, French, Greek, Russian, Romanian, Latvian, Bulgarian and Italian. But we all worship in the language of England, which is where we all are, and we all use a simple chant that is Western, could be improved, but is appropriate to our situation. I don't see how any other situation is tenable outside of recent immigrant communities.
Logged

Lord have mercy upon me a sinner
http://www.orthodoxmedway.org

My blog - http://anorthodoxpriest.blogspot.co.uk

The poster formerly known as peterfarrington
dzheremi
No longer posting here.
Warned
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Coptic
Posts: 4,383


« Reply #47 on: March 08, 2012, 03:59:20 PM »

I think you miss the point that Orthodoxy has always been enculturated. That is why there is a Coptic Orthodox Church.

With due respect, Father, I thought my whole post was a question about how it should be enculturated, not a denial that it is. Perhaps it didn't read that way. I apologize for being unclear.

Quote
I also think that you are being too negative, and a little unfair, about what an American Orthodox Church does look like and should look like. Who is suggesting that it should encompass Purpose Driven Life and Evangelical songs?

Huh? I am certainly not suggesting anything of the kind. I am recalling observations made by Aidan (post #32) and Brigidsboy (post #34) about what already goes on in some churches, and saying that it shouldn't be this way.

Quote
If I am British, as I am, then why should I not worship God as an Orthodox Christian in my own language, and with appropriate music? This has been the universal practice of Orthodoxy, EXCEPT when it comes to the West in modern times. Orthodoxy is properly respectful of culture. I am not sure why you think that is a problem?


I feel like you and I have been over this territory many times, Father. Of course you should worship in your own language, but in a manner that is consistent with Orthodoxy. You (and most of the peoples of Europe, I'd suspect) are blessed to have authentic Christian traditions dating back to the very early church from which you can draw on in order to call the people back to their Orthodox roots, which are after all at the very heart of European Christian culture. America is different. Most of the country was settled by men and women of other persuasions, whose descendents by and large will not be moved by appeals to St. Athanasius' time spent in exile in Belgium or what have you. They would likely look at that and say "What does Belgium have to do with me?" This country understands Christianity to whatever extent it does almost entirely in Protestant and/or post-modern terms, so there is a lot that the average Christian is comfortable with that is not acceptable within Orthodoxy (and here I am not getting up on my high horse, but repeating what I was told in a conversation just last week with an elder of the church here in Albuquerque). I suppose you could call it a problem of rootlessness, but it seems much more severe here in America as there are precious few shrines to visit, few monasteries, few organizations or ensembles committed to reviving ancient chant forms, etc. So if it seems like I am a bit more negative than you, it is hopefully a reflection of the serious appraisal of the state of Christianity in this country. We have a lot of work to do. We don't have a native Orthodoxy save what the Russians brought to my home area, and to a few of the native people (Tlingit people and others).

Quote
If there is a Coptic Orthodox Church then there should be an American Orthodox Church. The problem is when a Church from one culture insists that its language and music must be privileged, when in fact this was not what happened in its own history. Why does the Coptic Orthodox Church not use Armenian Chant, or vice-versa? Why then should Western Orthodox not be able to use Western music?

They should be able to. I am arguing that what they shouldn't be able to do is bring whatever it is they thought Christianity was into the church with very little oversight, all in the name of being comfortable or supposed cultural sensitivity. If we have to create a new church, let it be with its own chant in its own language, not a reflection of the Protestant and increasingly secularized Christianity that has ruled much of this country for centuries. Are we "Americans" first, Orthodox second? No, and there needn't be any sharp divide there, either. You can be both, but that doesn't mean that the church should mirror wider society when wider society is so often against the Orthodox faith. That's my only point. We should be changed by our struggle within the church, not struggling to change the church to suit us.

Quote
Once again, it is unfair to suggest that enculturation must lead to evangelicalism. It is unfair to suggest that there should be a Church culture for every minority culture in the US. But there could very reasonably be a Spanish speaking community, and an English speaking community. I am not sure why the fact that clearly you appreciate Coptic chant and Arabic, which is a blessing to you, means that there is something wrong with the majority of Western folk who don't.

Father, I'm part of that Spanish-speaking community. There's no divide here. I can walk and chew gum (as the American saying goes), and for those who can't, let them just walk. That's fine. But let us strive to be Orthodox in all things. If having a Spanish-speaking community in the Coptic church or any other church means that some cultural aspects that would otherwise be unacceptable ("evil eye", el cucuy) are accepted, then isn't that doing a disservice to the missionary effort? I would be against it. I would hope that everyone would be against it. Similarly with the majority of Western people. We can't just let everything in the name of letting everyone in. Music, of course, is a bit of a grey area, if you will, as there is often more trouble in the associations of particular forms than in their content. I once got into a very interesting discussion with a Roman Catholic about the permissibility of the "Mariachi Masses" that you sometimes see in Mexico. While there is perhaps nothing inherently unorthodox about the guitar or the fiddle (it depends on who you ask, I guess), my RC friend maintained that as the context for the use of such ensembles is a worldly one, they ought to be avoided in the church lest we bring worldliness in with them. I'm still not entirely sure how to take that argument (after all, don't things evolve away from worldliness, as the things of this world that may be baptized are baptized?), but I think that absent solid Orthodox teaching first, such permissiveness is likely to lead to some wrong ideas about just what we're doing in the church. Y'know, like how some people argue that dancing should be permitted in all churches because the Ethiopians have something in their tradition that outsiders would call dancing. This forgets that the Ethiopians are first and foremost Orthodox. The key is always in being first and foremost Orthodox. Proper musical forms should, at least in theory, follow, once the people understand what it is for (i.e., the theology to be expressed through it).

Quote
I am not sure why you speak as if it was not absolutely clear that there is a tradition of Orthodox Chant in the West? Why speak as if it is something I have made up? Why speak as if every Orthodox group that is trying to engage with English speaking people is doing something wrong? I don't want anyone in my congregation to have to learn Coptic or Arabic to be Orthodox, am I an evangelical or deficient in some other way?

Father, forgive me, but I don't understand what you are referring to here. Do you mean my other post where I asked you about the Orthodox tradition in the British isles? I know that it is not possible to convey tone through the internet, but that was really just a question. I didn't have ulterior motives in asking it. Like I specified in that post, I asked because I didn't know, because my focus as far as Europe is concerned is on other areas (Spain and Portugal, mainly). I did not mean even for a second to suggest that you are making anything up, or any of the other things you apparently think I suggested through that question. It was really just a question because I didn't know, and I have read posts from you that mention it but didn't talk about what exactly it is. I am sorry if I offended you in some way with my question; that was not at all my intention. You have information I was curious about, that's all. Embarrassed

Quote
Orthodoxy should be open to people of all backgrounds. In my own British Orthodox congregation this is the case. I have had English, Egyptian, Syrian, Ethiopian, Eritrean, Indian, French, Greek, Russian, Romanian, Latvian, Bulgarian and Italian. But we all worship in the language of England, which is where we all are, and we all use a simple chant that is Western, could be improved, but is appropriate to our situation. I don't see how any other situation is tenable outside of recent immigrant communities.

I am in agreement with you, Father. I am writing about the situation in America, which I am not sure is entirely comparable to the situation in England, for reasons I have given earlier in this reply.
« Last Edit: March 08, 2012, 04:02:36 PM by dzheremi » Logged

lord doog
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Coptic
Posts: 55


« Reply #48 on: March 08, 2012, 04:07:15 PM »

Also, I must say I am concerned by the Coptic Church creating ethnic British, French and now American parishes... are the regular Coptic parishes only for Egyptians? I still prefer to think that an Orthodox parish, whether EO or OO, should be open to people of all backgrounds.
Why? Coptic just means Egyptian. So Coptic Orthodox is the Orthodox faith with Egyptian culture, traditions, rituals, etc. It's the same with any other Orthodox group. Armenian Orthodox have their rituals, Ethiopian Orthodox have theirs, Indian Orthodox theirs, and so on. As long as the faith is the same, the rituals can be whatever the ethnic group wants it to be. There shouldn't be a problem with ethnic British, French or American parishes because it is one common faith, and that is what's important.
Logged

“Many times I spoke, and as a result felt sorry, but I never regretted my silence.”  -Saint Arsenius the Great
Alpo
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Jerkodox
Posts: 6,850



« Reply #49 on: March 08, 2012, 04:16:07 PM »

we all use a simple chant that is Western

Father, is there any recording online where your chant could be heard?
Logged

minasoliman
Mr., Sir, Dude, Guy, Male, tr. Minas in Greek, Menes in white people Egyptologists :-P
Section Moderator
Toumarches
*****
Online Online

Faith: Oriental Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Coptic Orthodox Archdiocese of North America
Posts: 12,069


Strengthen O Lord the work of Your hands(Is 19:25)


WWW
« Reply #50 on: March 08, 2012, 08:33:47 PM »

I just want to ask something simple here.  What musical culture "crosses the line" of Orthodoxy so to speak?  For instance, what does one think of the "gospel music" tradition that many Protestants, particularly black Protestants?  Are they perhaps not something that can be baptized into Orthodoxy, in a liturgical format?

I remember when I was younger, I never knew anything about how Ethiopians prayed.  But I knew that as Copts, it was unacceptable to have instruments like pianos, and that the "cymbals and triangles were nothing but ways to help people follow the beat, and not to be understood as instruments."  I was taught that no clapping, moving the body in some form of dance, or ululating was allowed.  We should be still, always closing our eyes, always looking up, always praying with our hands lifted.

Perhaps, ancient Egyptians always thought this was proper form of worship.  At the same time, the ancient Coptic fathers did not force that type of culture on the Ethiopians.  They developed their clapping, dancing, drum beating, ululating praises into a liturgical form while keeping the Orthodox faith.

So then, one asks, where exactly is music and culture cross the line into heterodoxy?  I think one doesn't truly know.  But one at least, as HH Pope Shenouda teaches, should allow the culture itself to develop freely her own rites.  We don't have to, but someone will later come and do so probably themselves after understanding what Orthodox liturgy really means.  The Ethiopian rites weren't developed until St. Yared revolutionized worship.  It seemed until then, there was a form of worship that wasn't very palatable to the Ethiopian ears, and perhaps it's okay to conclude that this was probably an ancient form of Coptic worship that St. Yared seemed to have replaced with what St. Yared felt was appropriate spiritual worship for the Ethiopian ears and eyes, and this was two and a half centuries after St. Athanasius' sponsored mission to Ethiopia.

Understandably, "American culture" is tough to define today.  But as Orthodoxy grows, perhaps one can create communities of cultural Orthodox acceptable to the different cultures of the US.  I'm not saying however that we are the ones to do so.  We at least offer the Coptic tradition in English, and if someone comes by with the spirit of St. Yared to create something acceptable in a liturgical format, then why not?  This seems to be the precedent at least with ancient Coptic missions in Africa.
« Last Edit: March 08, 2012, 08:37:04 PM by minasoliman » Logged

Vain existence can never exist, for \\\"unless the LORD builds the house, the builders labor in vain.\\\" (Psalm 127)

If the faith is unchanged and rock solid, then the gates of Hades never prevailed in the end.
dzheremi
No longer posting here.
Warned
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Coptic
Posts: 4,383


« Reply #51 on: March 08, 2012, 09:24:33 PM »

I just want to ask something simple here.  What musical culture "crosses the line" of Orthodoxy so to speak?  For instance, what does one think of the "gospel music" tradition that many Protestants, particularly black Protestants?  Are they perhaps not something that can be baptized into Orthodoxy, in a liturgical format?

I would think so, yeah. There is an African American composer by the name of Grayson Warren Brown who did something similar in bringing the Gospel music style to Roman Catholic liturgical texts in the 1960s. He recorded an album of liturgical material in that style with the choir of an African-American college (the name of which escapes me at the moment) . I'm sure it was controversial for its time, but I thought it was neat.

Quote
Perhaps, ancient Egyptians always thought this was proper form of worship.  At the same time, the ancient Coptic fathers did not force that type of culture on the Ethiopians.  They developed their clapping, dancing, drum beating, ululating praises into a liturgical form while keeping the Orthodox faith.

Yes, and I think that Westerners must do the same. This is another reason I would be against the importation of any Protestant hymns into the church in any form. Their presence would seem to retard the development of Orthodox tradition. (i.e., it's easier to sing a pre-existing Protestant hymn than to write an Orthodox hymn in English, as there are far more of the former than the latter.)

Quote
So then, one asks, where exactly is music and culture cross the line into heterodoxy?  I think one doesn't truly know.  But one at least, as HH Pope Shenouda teaches, should allow the culture itself to develop freely her own rites.  We don't have to, but someone will later come and do so probably themselves after understanding what Orthodox liturgy really means.
 

God willing, yes.

Quote
Understandably, "American culture" is tough to define today.  But as Orthodoxy grows, perhaps one can create communities of cultural Orthodox acceptable to the different cultures of the US.  I'm not saying however that we are the ones to do so.  We at least offer the Coptic tradition in English, and if someone comes by with the spirit of St. Yared to create something acceptable in a liturgical format, then why not?  This seems to be the precedent at least with ancient Coptic missions in Africa.

Agreed on all fronts, except for the "we are not the ones to do so" part. My perspective is that of a native-born American not of Coptic ethnic/cultural background...though of course I am thoroughly unqualified for other reasons...  Wink
Logged

minasoliman
Mr., Sir, Dude, Guy, Male, tr. Minas in Greek, Menes in white people Egyptologists :-P
Section Moderator
Toumarches
*****
Online Online

Faith: Oriental Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Coptic Orthodox Archdiocese of North America
Posts: 12,069


Strengthen O Lord the work of Your hands(Is 19:25)


WWW
« Reply #52 on: March 08, 2012, 09:56:46 PM »

I just want to ask something simple here.  What musical culture "crosses the line" of Orthodoxy so to speak?  For instance, what does one think of the "gospel music" tradition that many Protestants, particularly black Protestants?  Are they perhaps not something that can be baptized into Orthodoxy, in a liturgical format?

I would think so, yeah. There is an African American composer by the name of Grayson Warren Brown who did something similar in bringing the Gospel music style to Roman Catholic liturgical texts in the 1960s. He recorded an album of liturgical material in that style with the choir of an African-American college (the name of which escapes me at the moment) . I'm sure it was controversial for its time, but I thought it was neat.

I would so love to hear this...that sounds amazing.  Smiley

Quote
Quote
Perhaps, ancient Egyptians always thought this was proper form of worship.  At the same time, the ancient Coptic fathers did not force that type of culture on the Ethiopians.  They developed their clapping, dancing, drum beating, ululating praises into a liturgical form while keeping the Orthodox faith.

Yes, and I think that Westerners must do the same. This is another reason I would be against the importation of any Protestant hymns into the church in any form. Their presence would seem to retard the development of Orthodox tradition. (i.e., it's easier to sing a pre-existing Protestant hymn than to write an Orthodox hymn in English, as there are far more of the former than the latter.)

Well, I don't know much about how Protestant hymns will fit into an Orthodox liturgical atmosphere.  I'm not after all comfortable with the guitar and fire camp Christianity, but again, I'm not the one to judge.  I'm only speaking based on theoretical basis here.  But considering that the Ethiopians do have some of the same liturgies we pray verbatim, how would the words of the Thanksgiving prayer for instance be used in a different musical setting?  Does not have to be the Protestant hymns themselves, but at least let's start with the already established words of the ancient churches.  Then perhaps, using that basis, these cultures may create some amazing hymns that mirror the other churches' developments.

Quote
Quote
So then, one asks, where exactly is music and culture cross the line into heterodoxy?  I think one doesn't truly know.  But one at least, as HH Pope Shenouda teaches, should allow the culture itself to develop freely her own rites.  We don't have to, but someone will later come and do so probably themselves after understanding what Orthodox liturgy really means.
 

God willing, yes.

Quote
Understandably, "American culture" is tough to define today.  But as Orthodoxy grows, perhaps one can create communities of cultural Orthodox acceptable to the different cultures of the US.  I'm not saying however that we are the ones to do so.  We at least offer the Coptic tradition in English, and if someone comes by with the spirit of St. Yared to create something acceptable in a liturgical format, then why not?  This seems to be the precedent at least with ancient Coptic missions in Africa.

Agreed on all fronts, except for the "we are not the ones to do so" part. My perspective is that of a native-born American not of Coptic ethnic/cultural background...though of course I am thoroughly unqualified for other reasons...  Wink

Well, forgive my racial "we."  Wink  I meant Egyptians like myself, who grew up with Coptic music, but might be tone deaf to other cultural norms.  I do believe that if other cultures do develop something acceptable and Orthodox, even if outside our comfort zones, then for the sake of mission, I should support its growth.
« Last Edit: March 08, 2012, 09:58:58 PM by minasoliman » Logged

Vain existence can never exist, for \\\"unless the LORD builds the house, the builders labor in vain.\\\" (Psalm 127)

If the faith is unchanged and rock solid, then the gates of Hades never prevailed in the end.
dzheremi
No longer posting here.
Warned
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Coptic
Posts: 4,383


« Reply #53 on: March 08, 2012, 10:57:51 PM »

I would so love to hear this...that sounds amazing.  Smiley

I think I got rid of the original LP before I moved, but I might have converted it to CD before I sold it. I'll try to dig it up and put some of it online somewhere this weekend.

Quote
Well, I don't know much about how Protestant hymns will fit into an Orthodox liturgical atmosphere.
 

Ahhh...there's the rub, right? Smiley If the Protestant hymns were an aid in creating the proper liturgical atmosphere, we would likely not see so many ex-Protestants among us here, there, and everywhere. (Ditto RCs, to include myself, though some of their music does still do the job -- the trouble there is that what passes for a musical setting in the average RC mass is just...well, sad, really. I shouldn't have to go to a monastery to feel like I am worshiping God with other Christians, but anyway...)

Quote
I'm not after all comfortable with the guitar and fire camp Christianity, but again, I'm not the one to judge.  I'm only speaking based on theoretical basis here.  But considering that the Ethiopians do have some of the same liturgies we pray verbatim, how would the words of the Thanksgiving prayer for instance be used in a different musical setting?
 

It's an interesting question. I have only heard it in one musical setting, of course, but there is nothing to stop it from being prayed in another. I would have no problem with it being put into a traditional Spanish/Mozarab setting (who could argue against something like this?), but then that is just a bit of my own
ethnic/cultural bias poking through. Smiley That's why I asked earlier about how this is supposed to work in a country of hundreds of different ethnic and cultural groups. The RCs already have a setup whereby the Anglos have their Mass and the Latinos theirs, but I would be afraid (because I went to many Spanish masses when I was RC) about the possibility of effectively creating two separate and unequal communities. Probably with the OO it would not be a problem, though.

Quote
Does not have to be the Protestant hymns themselves, but at least let's start with the already established words of the ancient churches.  Then perhaps, using that basis, these cultures may create some amazing hymns that mirror the other churches' developments.

Yes. And make no mistake about it: You can find plenty of brilliant examples of early American and Canadian folk melodies that could be adopted for some sort of religious use (I hesitate to say "liturgical", because I don't know what goes into developing a liturgy). Take, for instance, American banjo player Roscoe Holcomb's take on the American traditional "I am a man of constant sorrow" (first recorded 1913, but probably composed sometime in the late 1800s). It's really moving, haunting almost, but of course it is a folk/blues song. Could something similar be made with an ancient liturgical text? I don't see why not, it just hasn't happened yet. Perhaps these melodies are too old fashioned or provincial sounding to appeal to wide cross-sections of America. And there again, we would run into the issue of the many cultures in this country: Would we have a more "Hispanic" style of chant here in Albuquerque (and what about the Navajos? They're about 5% of our population), but a more "Lutheran-esque" chant in the historically Scandinavian areas of the country, like Minnesota? At what point would it end? From my point of view, the problem is not so much that American culture is hard to define, it's that it is not one thing and we are hyper-individualists, so collective identity is hard to establish on a macro-level. For some people, an "American" anything would probably involve an air show and Bruce Springsteen's "Born in the USA", while others think of Garrison Keillor's Lake Wobegon. Both those groups are equally American, even if each might not see the other on the same level. So it would take a long time to develop something organically.

Quote
Well, forgive my racial "we."  Wink  I meant Egyptians like myself, who grew up with Coptic music, but might be tone deaf to other cultural norms.  I do believe that if other cultures do develop something acceptable and Orthodox, even if outside our comfort zones, then for the sake of mission, I should support its growth.

I agree.
Logged

minasoliman
Mr., Sir, Dude, Guy, Male, tr. Minas in Greek, Menes in white people Egyptologists :-P
Section Moderator
Toumarches
*****
Online Online

Faith: Oriental Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Coptic Orthodox Archdiocese of North America
Posts: 12,069


Strengthen O Lord the work of Your hands(Is 19:25)


WWW
« Reply #54 on: March 09, 2012, 12:52:23 AM »

Yes. And make no mistake about it: You can find plenty of brilliant examples of early American and Canadian folk melodies that could be adopted for some sort of religious use (I hesitate to say "liturgical", because I don't know what goes into developing a liturgy). Take, for instance, American banjo player Roscoe Holcomb's take on the American traditional "I am a man of constant sorrow" (first recorded 1913, but probably composed sometime in the late 1800s). It's really moving, haunting almost, but of course it is a folk/blues song. Could something similar be made with an ancient liturgical text? I don't see why not, it just hasn't happened yet. Perhaps these melodies are too old fashioned or provincial sounding to appeal to wide cross-sections of America.

Well, "Oh Brother Where Art Thou" seemed to have modernized this song for our modern ears.  But, yes, I can see this being a possible "sub-American" culture of liturgical development.  It may sound old, but it has a sense of potential spirituality, and very hauntingly so.

I almost felt that he was beginning to say Lamentations, "I am the man who has seen affliction by the rod of His wrath..."
« Last Edit: March 09, 2012, 12:52:52 AM by minasoliman » Logged

Vain existence can never exist, for \\\"unless the LORD builds the house, the builders labor in vain.\\\" (Psalm 127)

If the faith is unchanged and rock solid, then the gates of Hades never prevailed in the end.
Salpy
Moderator
Toumarches
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Oriental Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Armenian Church
Posts: 12,722


Pray for the Christians of Iraq and Syria.


« Reply #55 on: March 10, 2012, 12:58:44 PM »

The mission's website now has a link to photos of the first liturgy, as well as an MP3 you can listen to.

http://stpauloc.org/
Logged

minasoliman
Mr., Sir, Dude, Guy, Male, tr. Minas in Greek, Menes in white people Egyptologists :-P
Section Moderator
Toumarches
*****
Online Online

Faith: Oriental Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Coptic Orthodox Archdiocese of North America
Posts: 12,069


Strengthen O Lord the work of Your hands(Is 19:25)


WWW
« Reply #56 on: March 10, 2012, 07:53:02 PM »

They definitely did make in English a lot of the Coptic hymns we chant here:

http://www.youtube.com/stpauloc

I will caution the listener, while beautiful, some of the hymns do seem "abbreviated" musically from the original Coptic ones.  Wink

But otherwise, for a mission-oriented purpose, these are a nice collection, and a good beginning.  I guess it's good for Western cultures who are not in tune to the melismatic tunes the original Coptic ones give.
Logged

Vain existence can never exist, for \\\"unless the LORD builds the house, the builders labor in vain.\\\" (Psalm 127)

If the faith is unchanged and rock solid, then the gates of Hades never prevailed in the end.
Stavro
Warned
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Coptic Orthodox
Posts: 1,211



« Reply #57 on: March 11, 2012, 02:56:39 AM »

It is fashionable and trendy to have missionary parishes nowadays in the Coptic Church.

Lord have mercy!

Is your post suggesting that missionary parishes are an unfortunate development?  If so, why?

There are issues with the concept that is validated by practice and experience. A visit to the any of the "mission" churches in Toronto or Washington D.C. will make the issues clear if one is sensitive to Orthodox worship. A look at the priests who run the show will make it more evident.

There are examples of successful conversions due to interaction with true orthodox believers inside and outside the church, but these individuals do not label themselves as "mission" churches or groups for marketing purposes.
Logged

In that day there will be an altar to the LORD in the heart of Egypt, and a monument to the LORD at its border. (Isaiah 19:19)

" God forbid I should see the face of Judah or listen to his blasphemy" (Gerontius, Archmanidrite of the monastery of St. Melania)
minasoliman
Mr., Sir, Dude, Guy, Male, tr. Minas in Greek, Menes in white people Egyptologists :-P
Section Moderator
Toumarches
*****
Online Online

Faith: Oriental Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Coptic Orthodox Archdiocese of North America
Posts: 12,069


Strengthen O Lord the work of Your hands(Is 19:25)


WWW
« Reply #58 on: March 11, 2012, 03:15:29 AM »

It is fashionable and trendy to have missionary parishes nowadays in the Coptic Church.

Lord have mercy!

Is your post suggesting that missionary parishes are an unfortunate development?  If so, why?

There are issues with the concept that is validated by practice and experience. A visit to the any of the "mission" churches in Toronto or Washington D.C. will make the issues clear if one is sensitive to Orthodox worship. A look at the priests who run the show will make it more evident.

There are examples of successful conversions due to interaction with true orthodox believers inside and outside the church, but these individuals do not label themselves as "mission" churches or groups for marketing purposes.

I didn't think the DC church started as a mission church, but that the priest attracted non-Copts to it, which seem, from my few visits to the church, quite promising.  Thus far, the priest himself, even though he might not be something we're accustomed to listening his way of preaching, doesn't seem to hold any wrong beliefs as far as I've heard him.
Logged

Vain existence can never exist, for \\\"unless the LORD builds the house, the builders labor in vain.\\\" (Psalm 127)

If the faith is unchanged and rock solid, then the gates of Hades never prevailed in the end.
Salpy
Moderator
Toumarches
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Oriental Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Armenian Church
Posts: 12,722


Pray for the Christians of Iraq and Syria.


« Reply #59 on: March 12, 2012, 08:13:48 PM »

A tangent about possible Protestantizing influences in mission parishes was split off and put in the private forum:

http://www.orthodoxchristianity.net/forum/index.php/topic,43563.new.html#top

If you do not have access to the private forum, please pm Fr. Chris for admission.

I ask that all future posts alleging or discussing Protestantizing in mission parishes be posted in the new thread.
Logged

mabsoota
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Coptic
Posts: 2,567


Kyrie eleison


« Reply #60 on: March 13, 2012, 04:14:33 PM »

thanks, salpy, i feel better for it to be in the private forum.
Logged
Tags: missions Coptic Orthodox Church 
Pages: « 1 2  All   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.1 seconds with 43 queries.