Of course he missed my point. Reading comprehension?
Oh do grow up.
If you noticed the phrases I bolded, I was pointing out that the Peters twins (who are not the only "twincest" stars; there are even some triplet porn stars) are very popular celebrities in the "gay community", enough to double an already very popular porn site's traffic and to be paraded about in South Florida's gay scene.
Well gee, so sorry I don't keep up with news in the world of gay pornography.
And why wouldn't they be popular? Having sex with yourself is the apotheosis of narcissism, even more than having sex with a member your own sex.
Um, no, it would be the apotheosis of kin selection, and having sex with your own sex has nothing to do with narcissism.
Is it not strange to you that 2 of the 3 biggest spectator events in California are public exhibitions of gay sex in all its fetish varieties?
You haven't given me any reason to believe this yet.
Like I said, that's just a sample.
No, it isn't. A "sample" is when you randomly collect people from a population. For this to be a sample you'd have to have collected at least several dozen homosexual individuals from the community you are interested in looking at, at random. A handful of fetishist porn stars are about as far away from being a representative sample as you can get.
The "gay community" is at the cutting edge of decadent perversion although the "straight" world is working hard to catch up.