I think Lubeltri was getting to the idea of having sex with your clone, which a twin is a natural. Assuming they are identical twins: I've never heard of them before. And would have been quite fine if it stayed that way.
Of course he missed my point. Reading comprehension?
Oh do grow up.
If you noticed the phrases I bolded, I was pointing out that the Peters twins (who are not the only "twincest" stars; there are even some triplet porn stars) are very popular celebrities in the "gay community", enough to double an already very popular porn site's traffic and to be paraded about in South Florida's gay scene.
Well gee, so sorry I don't keep up with news in the world of gay pornography.
And why wouldn't they be popular? Having sex with yourself is the apotheosis of narcissism, even more than having sex with a member your own sex.
Um, no, it would be the apotheosis of kin selection, and having sex with your own sex has nothing to do with narcissism.
depends on what you mean by sample:a sampling of gay communities across the country or a sampling of what they do.
Is it not strange to you that 2 of the 3 biggest spectator events in California are public exhibitions of gay sex in all its fetish varieties?
You haven't given me any reason to believe this yet.
Like I said, that's just a sample.
No, it isn't. A "sample" is when you randomly collect people from a population. For this to be a sample you'd have to have collected at least several dozen homosexual individuals from the community you are interested in looking at, at random. A handful of fetishist porn stars are about as far away from being a representative sample as you can get.
As for representative, if this is the public face they put on as a community, well, there you are.
Not every Muslim is like Usamah bin Ladini, but until the Muslims police their own better, that's the image they're stuck with.
So I guess that both Brother Nathaniel and Archbishop Lazar are both the public face, and representative, of Orthodoxy? And I suppose that Quran-burning pastor in Florida is the public face, and representative, of Protestantism? And Scott Roeder is the public face, and representative, of anti-abortion activists?
Do I need to repeat my point? These types of things I cited are not disavowed
by most gays. I'm not saying "twincest" is common among gays, I'm saying that identical twins who have sex with each other are mainstream celebrities
in the "gay community". The two San Francisco public gay sex exhibitions are 2 of the 3 most popular spectator events in all of California, with hundreds
of thousands of spectators, perhaps even a million for SF Pride. Monogamy is not normative in long-term gay relationships, and few same-sex marriages take place in places where it is legal. I could cite more examples.
This stuff is mainstream. The comparison to Osama bin Laden is silly, since he wasn't mainstream in the Muslim world.
The idea that homosexual activists want to ape bourgeois practices like monogamous marriage and kids and all that is a political strategy, not a reality. Up until the 1990s, the "LGBT" movement wanted nothing to do with such "heteronormative" stuff, focusing instead on a general sexual "liberation". "Gay culture" is as soaked in sex as a Christmas pudding is soaked in brandy---particularly gay male culture. Not that the wider culture isn't trying its hardest to catch up.