OrthodoxChristianity.net
September 02, 2014, 09:01:42 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Reminder: No political discussions in the public fora.  If you do not have access to the private Politics Forum, please send a PM to Fr. George.
 
   Home   Help Calendar Contact Treasury Tags Login Register  
Pages: 1   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: How an icon brought a Calvinist to Orthodoxy  (Read 398 times) Average Rating: 0
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
HandmaidenofGod
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the USA (Ecumenical Patriarch)
Posts: 3,397


O Holy St. Demetrius pray to God for us!


« on: December 17, 2011, 03:42:22 PM »

A Friend shared this on her facebook page, and I thought it worth sharing with all of you:   
http://journeytoorthodoxy.com/2011/12/09/how-an-icon-brought-a-calvinist-to-orthodoxy/#axzz1goGP0h33


 
Logged

"For I know the thoughts that I think toward you, says the LORD, thoughts of peace and not of evil, to give you a future and a hope." Jer 29:11
Volnutt
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Agnostic/Universalist
Posts: 3,107


« Reply #1 on: December 17, 2011, 07:23:34 PM »

Quote
My eyes kept going back to this one particular icon of Christ holding the Bible in His hand. For the next several days I could not get that icon out of my mind.

That definitely happened to me. Thanks for posting that.



As personally edifying as I found it, he gets a couple of things wrong. The synagogue with images he refers to (the one at Dura Europos), is second century, not first. It's also right next to a house church, so Christian influence is very possible there. Jesus and His disciples would have gone to synagogues with rosettes and floral designs, but no evidence they had full blown images of people outside the Temple. And as seems to be usual in popular Orthodox apologetics, he jumps from "images are not Biblically forbidden" to "images are to be venerated" without establishing the latter.

Second, he mentions Eusebius while neglecting the fact that Eusebius is quite uncertain about holy images, calling them a "Gentile custom." IIRC, in another place when asked for a portrait of Jesus, he even uses the later iconoclast argument that no image could truly portray Incarnate God. So while Calvin might have been wrong that the fourth century Church was image-less (if Calvin even says that, I don't know whether he does or not), to thereby imply as the blog post does that the fourth century Church had the high view of icons found in modern Orthodoxy is not at all in evidence.
Logged
Tags:
Pages: 1   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.049 seconds with 29 queries.