OrthodoxChristianity.net
April 23, 2014, 10:31:22 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: The Rules page has been updated.  Please familiarize yourself with its contents!
 
   Home   Help Calendar Contact Treasury Tags Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 »  All   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Notorious Atheist Christopher Hitchens Dies  (Read 4112 times) Average Rating: 0
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Gebre Menfes Kidus
"SERVANT of The HOLY SPIRIT"
Warned
Taxiarches
**********
Online Online

Faith: Ethiopian Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Orthodox Tewahedo / Non-Chalcedonian
Posts: 7,824


"Lord Have Mercy on Me a Sinner!"


WWW
« Reply #45 on: December 17, 2011, 11:38:18 AM »

I'm going to stir the pot a bit.

For starters, I'm glad he's gone. He was a drunken, genocidal coward, a self-aggrandizing misogynistic idiot, a callous ends-justify-the-means imperialist, a neoconservative shill who eagerly abandoned his intellectual principles whenever they came into conflict with his all-pervasive hatred of Islam and Muslims, and a smirking, self-congratulatory sexist. The world is better off without men like him in it.

Hitchens, who conclusively proves, as if it needed more any more evidence in its favor, that Americans will assume intelligence on the part of anything with a British accent, given the ferver with which people accepted his self-righteous posturing as intelligent thought. He constantly celebrated the deaths of others and bad-mouthed the recently-deceased. He made a point of it. He argued that offense was a completely meaningless concept and only hurts robust discussion. Anyone getting pious over this is being self-serving as all gently caress.

And yet I haven't even delved into his atheist rhetoric which had the depth of a children's swimming pool. He constantly railed against religion without even the slightest comprehension on the basic tenets of each faith. Young impressionable atheists were ever so swept by his false grandeur of logic and reason. In fact Hitchens may be the single reason why atheism has a worse reputation. Him and Dawkins both were/are exceptionally rude about there not being a god to the point of being obnoxious about it.

Good riddance.


I agree with much of your assessment, especially the part about Americans assuming intelligence on the part of anyone with a British accent (Madonna is genius! lol). I also agree that his atheistic arguments were hardly profound, but he was still better than most when it came to debating the subject. However, that just shows how low the bar is. I also agree that he should certainly not be lauded as some type of intellectual hero or noble person. In my opinion, he was witty, entertaining, and at least had the integrity to cultivate his own convictions- as perverse as those convictions may have been. But from a spiritual perspective, I must agree with you that his life caused far more harm than good. Nevertheless, I don't want to ever rejoice in anyone's death.

By the way, I applaud you for having the courage to offer your honest opinions about the man.



Selam
Logged

“Lord, I say too many uncharitable things about people every day. I say them because they make me look clever. Help me to realize how cheap this is. I am stupid, quite as stupid as the people I ridicule. Help me to stop this selfishness, because I love You dear God." ~ FLANNERY O'CONNOR ~
Clemente
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Europe
Posts: 210


« Reply #46 on: December 17, 2011, 01:26:23 PM »

I'm going to stir the pot a bit.

For starters, I'm glad he's gone. He was a drunken, genocidal coward, a self-aggrandizing misogynistic idiot, a callous ends-justify-the-means imperialist, a neoconservative shill who eagerly abandoned his intellectual principles whenever they came into conflict with his all-pervasive hatred of Islam and Muslims, and a smirking, self-congratulatory sexist. The world is better off without men like him in it.

Hitchens, who conclusively proves, as if it needed more any more evidence in its favor, that Americans will assume intelligence on the part of anything with a British accent, given the ferver with which people accepted his self-righteous posturing as intelligent thought. He constantly celebrated the deaths of others and bad-mouthed the recently-deceased. He made a point of it. He argued that offense was a completely meaningless concept and only hurts robust discussion. Anyone getting pious over this is being self-serving as all gently caress.

And yet I haven't even delved into his atheist rhetoric which had the depth of a children's swimming pool. He constantly railed against religion without even the slightest comprehension on the basic tenets of each faith. Young impressionable atheists were ever so swept by his false grandeur of logic and reason. In fact Hitchens may be the single reason why atheism has a worse reputation. Him and Dawkins both were/are exceptionally rude about there not being a god to the point of being obnoxious about it.

Good riddance.

Well said. William Lane Craig, a Christian philosopher, destroyed Hitchens in a debate.

Why do atheists have to be rude?

Logged
GTAsoldier
Elder
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Christian
Jurisdiction: God knows what lives in me in place of me....
Posts: 443


GTAsoldier
« Reply #47 on: December 17, 2011, 04:42:53 PM »

I will NEVER understand Bill Maher's appeal. He is a joke. A horrible stand up. A worse B movie actor.

Why people think the guy is edgy, I will never know.

The TWO times he ever said something with a hint of edge, he cried crocodile tears afterward and gave a mea culpa.

Politically Incorrect my ([redacted comments about the rules governing the use language on the forum to suggest the word I was going to use]).

Agreed brother.


Selam

Same here. And I can't stand Dawkins either.

- GTA
Logged

God be merciful to us sinners.

Quote from: IoanC
the best way of conveying God's love to people is through your own presence and deeds.
No longer posting on this forum. Thanks to all the helpful people who inspired me. God bless.
Orthodox11
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,999


« Reply #48 on: December 17, 2011, 06:09:51 PM »

I can't stand Dawkins either.

The difference between Dawkins and Hitchens:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hrT8-hPEzNo
Logged
Volnutt
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Inquirer
Jurisdiction: Protestant, for now...
Posts: 3,106


« Reply #49 on: December 17, 2011, 07:25:01 PM »

Why do atheists have to be rude?


Not all are.
Logged

I'm not posting on oc.net for the time being. Thank you to everyone for your support!
Gebre Menfes Kidus
"SERVANT of The HOLY SPIRIT"
Warned
Taxiarches
**********
Online Online

Faith: Ethiopian Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Orthodox Tewahedo / Non-Chalcedonian
Posts: 7,824


"Lord Have Mercy on Me a Sinner!"


WWW
« Reply #50 on: December 18, 2011, 02:06:32 AM »

This is interesting, FWIW:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E9TMwfkDwIY



Selam
Logged

“Lord, I say too many uncharitable things about people every day. I say them because they make me look clever. Help me to realize how cheap this is. I am stupid, quite as stupid as the people I ridicule. Help me to stop this selfishness, because I love You dear God." ~ FLANNERY O'CONNOR ~
Hiwot
Christ is Risen!
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church
Posts: 1,959


Job 19:25-27


« Reply #51 on: December 18, 2011, 05:05:01 PM »

Humanity is an army. Our MOtto should be, nobody and no one should be left behind.

Amen!

such clarity! that in the eyes of the enemy we are all the same, in the eyes of the One who Loves us, we are all loveable!Love in its beautiful simplicity...  says " I am my brother's keeper!"

God bless you my brother!
Logged

To God be the Glory in all things! Amen!

Only pray for me, that God would give me both inward and outward strength, that I may not only speak, but truly will; and that I may not merely be called a Christian, but really be found to be one. St.Ignatius of Antioch.Epistle to the Romans.
Balthasar
Elder
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Christian
Jurisdiction: Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church
Posts: 262



« Reply #52 on: December 19, 2011, 11:36:11 AM »


„He will be missed!“? This must be a joke. What do you miss him for? For his „intellect“ …. wooow, where did he get the intellect that told him to reject the Almighty God from? I am pretty sure he got it from Satan. So, why can someone be missed who rejected God, who blasphemed the Holy Spirit and who to the end tirelessly mocked the followers of Christ?

A couple of months ago I watched a stupid debate between him and the unholy-Spirited ex-Premier, Tony Blair. The whole debate was organized to lift up the spirit and ego of Mr. Hitchins. The guests in the room were purposely selected by the organizers to give rounds of applause to the rhetoric-obsessed Hitchins. And they all looked stupid and primitive, as they use the same old boring trick to mock beliefs and believers. Of course, at the end of the debate he was declared the winner – against religion, perhaps, against God.

I truly prefer a softly-spoken, stuttering nobody – like Moses – to the pseudo-wisemen á la Hicthins. This world doesn't need loud arrogant talkative individuals anymore. Who is louder than the rest at the moment? Atheists, Gays and Muslims. Frankly speaking, the world doesn't need them right now.

With his painful illness, mr. Hitchins had a better chance to know and learn God. He was given a chance to repent. But, he didn't. By refusing to do so he continued leading many astray. He was a public figure, and was supposed to repent publicly. Can you imagine how many lost souls could have been saved, if he had said before his death, “I am very sorry, I was wrong for denying God...”? No, he didn't repent, Hitler, Stalin, Mohammad never repented, his other hatemonger brothers and sisters in satan, like R. Dawkins and Madalyn Murray O'Hair continue their battle against the Christian God. King David calls them “fools”, and the scripture tells us these individuals land in hell. They will meet their master, satan, over there. The interesting thing is, it would be satan their master, who himself believes in the existence of God, that will be the first to great and accuse them why they didn't acknowledge Go while on Earth.

Please understand that I don't condemn anyone, for the Bible condemns all of us as guilty, dirty, rotten, hell-deserving sinners.

Logged
GiC
Resident Atheist
Site Supporter
Merarches
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Mathematician
Posts: 9,490



« Reply #53 on: December 19, 2011, 01:35:05 PM »


„He will be missed!“? This must be a joke. What do you miss him for? For his „intellect“ …. wooow, where did he get the intellect that told him to reject the Almighty God from? I am pretty sure he got it from Satan. So, why can someone be missed who rejected God, who blasphemed the Holy Spirit and who to the end tirelessly mocked the followers of Christ?

A couple of months ago I watched a stupid debate between him and the unholy-Spirited ex-Premier, Tony Blair. The whole debate was organized to lift up the spirit and ego of Mr. Hitchins. The guests in the room were purposely selected by the organizers to give rounds of applause to the rhetoric-obsessed Hitchins. And they all looked stupid and primitive, as they use the same old boring trick to mock beliefs and believers. Of course, at the end of the debate he was declared the winner – against religion, perhaps, against God.

I truly prefer a softly-spoken, stuttering nobody – like Moses – to the pseudo-wisemen á la Hicthins. This world doesn't need loud arrogant talkative individuals anymore. Who is louder than the rest at the moment? Atheists, Gays and Muslims. Frankly speaking, the world doesn't need them right now.

With his painful illness, mr. Hitchins had a better chance to know and learn God. He was given a chance to repent. But, he didn't. By refusing to do so he continued leading many astray. He was a public figure, and was supposed to repent publicly. Can you imagine how many lost souls could have been saved, if he had said before his death, “I am very sorry, I was wrong for denying God...”? No, he didn't repent, Hitler, Stalin, Mohammad never repented, his other hatemonger brothers and sisters in satan, like R. Dawkins and Madalyn Murray O'Hair continue their battle against the Christian God. King David calls them “fools”, and the scripture tells us these individuals land in hell. They will meet their master, satan, over there. The interesting thing is, it would be satan their master, who himself believes in the existence of God, that will be the first to great and accuse them why they didn't acknowledge Go while on Earth.

Please understand that I don't condemn anyone, for the Bible condemns all of us as guilty, dirty, rotten, hell-deserving sinners.

Rest assured friend, though he is dead his message will endure, even today the glorious message of secularism is reshaping the face of Europe, making strong inroads into the United States, and will eventually overtake the inferior belief structures that came before throughout the entire civilized world. But all in good time.
Logged

"The liberties of people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them." -- Patrick Henry
dzheremi
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Coptic
Posts: 4,027


« Reply #54 on: December 19, 2011, 03:00:13 PM »

The inevitable march of progress, eh GiC? I don't buy it. Islam is reshaping Europe and the rest of the West, too, but apparently that doesn't fit into your scheme, so you don't mention it. Roll Eyes

The best secularists (not the new militant atheists a la Hitchens and Dawkins) recognize the value of religion. Salman Rushdie was interviewed by Bill Moyers a few years ago for the latter's "Faith and Reason" series on PBS. He was asked by Moyers if he ever felt any twinge of potential belief, since after all his writing often deals with religious themes. Rushdie replied that he does not, but that it doesn't matter if he himself doesn't have religious faith, because everyone he's writing about does. Away from ego-driven loudmouths like Dawkins, Hitchens, et. al., this is the kind of atheism/agnosticism/secularism most people encounter in the West. It does not seek to destroy religion because it recognizes that religion is important to people outside of itself, to vast majorities of many societies. I like this kind of secularism, and would support it over either the anti-religion of Hitchens' lapdogs or the fanaticism of Qutb's descendents. If you would support something more hardline than this, then who are you to present your stance as the progressive way forward for humanity? It is not any less destructive and poisonous to free thought than what you're fighting against.

So I do not buy it. I do not think you or the other militant atheist types here there and everywhere are sincere. You've puffed yourselves up as though history and time are on your side. I seem to remember a few other philosophies which taught similarly, and which in the end failed miserably. It is a matter of "meet the new boss, same as the old boss", and just as people in the ex-Soviet Union and its satellites eventually grew tired of waiting for a secular utopia that would never come, eventually the current fashion of thought that has elevated the new atheism will change and something else will take its place.

They've been telling us that "God is dead" for many decades now, and yet belief in God always outlives those who claim that. Case in point, the topic of this thread.
« Last Edit: December 19, 2011, 03:01:40 PM by dzheremi » Logged

Papist
Patriarch of Pontification
Toumarches
************
Offline Offline

Faith: Catholic
Jurisdiction: Byzantine
Posts: 11,963


Truth, Justice, and the American way!


« Reply #55 on: December 19, 2011, 03:07:25 PM »

I will NEVER understand Bill Maher's appeal. He is a joke. A horrible stand up. A worse B movie actor.

Why people think the guy is edgy, I will never know.

The TWO times he ever said something with a hint of edge, he cried crocodile tears afterward and gave a mea culpa.

Politically Incorrect my ([redacted comments about the rules governing the use language on the forum to suggest the word I was going to use]).

Agreed brother.


Selam

Same here. And I can't stand Dawkins either.

- GTA
I'm fairly certain that Dawkins is either stupid, dishonest, or both. Whatever happened to the intelligent atheists of old?
Logged

Note Papist's influence from the tyrannical monarchism of traditional papism .
orthonorm
Hoplitarches
*************
Offline Offline

Posts: 16,167



« Reply #56 on: December 19, 2011, 03:15:25 PM »

Humanity is an army. Our MOtto should be, nobody and no one should be left behind.

Amen!

such clarity! that in the eyes of the enemy we are all the same, in the eyes of the One who Loves us, we are all loveable!Love in its beautiful simplicity...  says " I am my brother's keeper!"

God bless you my brother!

As an early Pasadist, I am glad his message is catching on.
Logged

Gradually fading away on a strict punishment schedule.
GiC
Resident Atheist
Site Supporter
Merarches
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Mathematician
Posts: 9,490



« Reply #57 on: December 19, 2011, 03:35:43 PM »

The inevitable march of progress, eh GiC? I don't buy it. Islam is reshaping Europe and the rest of the West, too, but apparently that doesn't fit into your scheme, so you don't mention it. Roll Eyes

Even the Islamic world will likely come around, just long after the civilized world.

Quote
The best secularists (not the new militant atheists a la Hitchens and Dawkins) recognize the value of religion. Salman Rushdie was interviewed by Bill Moyers a few years ago for the latter's "Faith and Reason" series on PBS. He was asked by Moyers if he ever felt any twinge of potential belief, since after all his writing often deals with religious themes. Rushdie replied that he does not, but that it doesn't matter if he himself doesn't have religious faith, because everyone he's writing about does. Away from ego-driven loudmouths like Dawkins, Hitchens, et. al., this is the kind of atheism/agnosticism/secularism most people encounter in the West. It does not seek to destroy religion because it recognizes that religion is important to people outside of itself, to vast majorities of many societies. I like this kind of secularism, and would support it over either the anti-religion of Hitchens' lapdogs or the fanaticism of Qutb's descendents. If you would support something more hardline than this, then who are you to present your stance as the progressive way forward for humanity? It is not any less destructive and poisonous to free thought than what you're fighting against.

I don't think anyone, Dawkins and Hitchens included, is trying to actively destroy religion. The statement that Christianity is on its way out is merely an observation, not a declaration of war. The secularists have no need to destroy religion, because, quite frankly, the religious are doing a fine job all by themselves. But the true driving power is education, a more educated populace is a less religious populace and I see very little chance that the role of education and knowledge in our society will diminish in the coming century.

Quote
So I do not buy it. I do not think you or the other militant atheist types here there and everywhere are sincere. You've puffed yourselves up as though history and time are on your side. I seem to remember a few other philosophies which taught similarly, and which in the end failed miserably. It is a matter of "meet the new boss, same as the old boss", and just as people in the ex-Soviet Union and its satellites eventually grew tired of waiting for a secular utopia that would never come, eventually the current fashion of thought that has elevated the new atheism will change and something else will take its place.

The belief in a utopia, be it in this life or the next, is a political position, it's a statement on the ideal manner in which a people should be ruled. The statement that there is no god is a simple probabilistic observation, no belief in the ideals of the state required.

Quote
They've been telling us that "God is dead" for many decades now, and yet belief in God always outlives those who claim that. Case in point, the topic of this thread.

In Nietzsche's social circles, that was true when he said it, it's true for much larger segments of society today and I only see the trend continuing.
Logged

"The liberties of people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them." -- Patrick Henry
dzheremi
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Coptic
Posts: 4,027


« Reply #58 on: December 19, 2011, 04:13:41 PM »

I don't think anyone, Dawkins and Hitchens included, is trying to actively destroy religion. The statement that Christianity is on its way out is merely an observation, not a declaration of war.

So what would you call writing a book titled "God is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything"? If I wrote a book called "Why GiC is an idiot and his point of view is dangerous and will ruin the world", could I then fall back on "hey, I'm just making an observation"? No. You're making a stand. You're making some sort of point in favor of your viewpoint over the viewpoints of others. Don't cop out with all that "hey, we're only observing this stuff" business. Your original post that I responded to was about what a great impact these secularists are having on society. (And I agree that they are, my point is just don't back away from it now. That's dishonest.)

Quote
The belief in a utopia, be it in this life or the next, is a political position, it's a statement on the ideal manner in which a people should be ruled. The statement that there is no god is a simple probabilistic observation, no belief in the ideals of the state required.

Here's the disconnect between arguing as you are now and the kinds of arguments that come out of the Hitchens and his ilk: If God does not exist, who cares? Why is it bad if I believe in something that is not scientifically verifiable? I'm not talking about religious extremism; that is obviously bad. I'm talking about basic belief of the "yes or no" variety. If I say "well, I believe that God does exist, because science has its place and that place is not to answer the ultimate questions about the point of our existence", what does it matter? Every single atheist or atheistically-minded person I've ever talked to makes the argument that this would hold back humanity in some way. So to read that disbelief in God does not require a belief about the ideal of the state (intellectual and material progress and whatnot), well...I'm willing to grant you that, but also you'd be the first. I don't really see how that works, but I guess that's only because ultimately every atheist I've ever read about, talked to, listened to, etc. ultimately falls back on this "you must shed your superstitions" idea -- well, WHY? If it's not about something good happening when I do that, then why? Because you can't find God with laboratory equipment? But I don't care about that...I leave work at work!

(Sorry, I don't mean to harangue you, since you don't appear to be making that argument. I'm just not understanding how atheism is preferable to theism if that is not included. Why cheer on the advance of secularism if you don't think man is better off for it? What's the advantage if it isn't about reaching some more advanced state? That everyone will be rational because rationalism is inherently good or something?)

Quote
In Nietzsche's social circles, that was true when he said it, it's true for much larger segments of society today and I only see the trend continuing.

Why then do other thinkers such as Huntington make the argument that religious and cultural identities are the new source of conflict in the post-cold war world? What is all of this conflict in the Middle East and exported from there to the West about, then? Maybe Osama Bin Laden was really just frustrated about the lack of progress in education in his part of the world? Or do a billion people (or many more billions, if you count all religious believers as being a homogenous group by virtue of a common belief in something) not matter because they're not part of the "civilized world", as you alluded to in the part of your reply about the Muslim world?

It's easy to look at America and Europe and say that secularism will win the day. Well, America and Europe are not the world. I would think that our current war against radical Islamic terrorism would drive that point home, but it seems that all many people have gotten out of it is "religion bad".
Logged

Gebre Menfes Kidus
"SERVANT of The HOLY SPIRIT"
Warned
Taxiarches
**********
Online Online

Faith: Ethiopian Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Orthodox Tewahedo / Non-Chalcedonian
Posts: 7,824


"Lord Have Mercy on Me a Sinner!"


WWW
« Reply #59 on: December 19, 2011, 04:27:14 PM »

But the true driving power is education propaganda, a more educated brainwashed populace is a less religious populace


I fixed your sentence above to clarify what I suspect you really mean.



"Education is a weapon, whose effect depends on who holds it in his hands and at whom it is aimed." -Joseph Stalin-

"Our educational policy must enable everyone who receives an education to develop morally, intellectually and physically and become a worker with both socialist consciousness and culture." -Mao Tse Tung-[On the Correct Handling of Contradictions Among the People (February 27, 1959), 1st pocket ed., p. 44.]

"As for education for cadres whether at work or in schools for cadres, a policy should be established of focusing such education on the study of the practical problems of the Chinese revolution and using the basic principles of Marxism-Leninism as the guide, and the method of studying Marxism-Leninism statically and in isolation should be discarded." -Mao Tse Tung-
["Reform Our Study" (May 1941), Selected Works, Vol. III, p. 24.]

"Through clever and constant application of propaganda, people can be made to see paradise as hell, and also the other way round".  -Adolf Hitler- [Mein Kampf page 376]

Education under Pol Pot
http://www.freemediaproductions.info/Lyceum/showthread.php?t=9676

Goebbels Principles of Propaganda
http://www.psywarrior.com/Goebbels.html


You see, "education" is too generic and too amorphous of a term. Great lies and great evils have been perpetrated in the name of "education." Politicians love to talk about education, because they understand that nobody will oppose "education." And they cleverly construct and pass all manner of immoral and godless legislation by euphemistically labeling their propaganda as "education." So, I'm not one to fall for that trick. Better to be an ignorant savage than an educated fool.


Selam
Logged

“Lord, I say too many uncharitable things about people every day. I say them because they make me look clever. Help me to realize how cheap this is. I am stupid, quite as stupid as the people I ridicule. Help me to stop this selfishness, because I love You dear God." ~ FLANNERY O'CONNOR ~
primuspilus
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Antiochian Orthodox Archdiocese of North America - Western Rite Orthodox
Posts: 5,840


Inserting personal quote here.


WWW
« Reply #60 on: December 19, 2011, 04:45:17 PM »

Quote
But the true driving power is education, a more educated populace is a less religious populace and I see very little chance that the role of education and knowledge in our society will diminish in the coming century
Wow GiC, you usually dont weild such a blunt instrument.......


PP
Logged

"I confidently affirm that whoever calls himself Universal Bishop is the precursor of Antichrist"
Gregory the Great
GiC
Resident Atheist
Site Supporter
Merarches
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Mathematician
Posts: 9,490



« Reply #61 on: December 19, 2011, 04:59:53 PM »

I don't think anyone, Dawkins and Hitchens included, is trying to actively destroy religion. The statement that Christianity is on its way out is merely an observation, not a declaration of war.

So what would you call writing a book titled "God is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything"? If I wrote a book called "Why GiC is an idiot and his point of view is dangerous and will ruin the world", could I then fall back on "hey, I'm just making an observation"? No. You're making a stand. You're making some sort of point in favor of your viewpoint over the viewpoints of others. Don't cop out with all that "hey, we're only observing this stuff" business. Your original post that I responded to was about what a great impact these secularists are having on society. (And I agree that they are, my point is just don't back away from it now. That's dishonest.)

How do you confuse the expression of his opinion with 'actively destroying religion'? No laws were passed that forbid your exercise of religion, you were in no well compelled to abandon your faith, Hitchens simply stated that 'god' throughout history has never been a positive influence on society, that the belief in such a god has historically been damaging and unproductive. But if you still desire, you're free to follow a religious belief system; it seems that you're not upset with secularists trying to destroy religion, you're upset that you're not allowed to destroy the secularists and deny them the same rights you claim for yourself.

Quote
Quote
The belief in a utopia, be it in this life or the next, is a political position, it's a statement on the ideal manner in which a people should be ruled. The statement that there is no god is a simple probabilistic observation, no belief in the ideals of the state required.

Here's the disconnect between arguing as you are now and the kinds of arguments that come out of the Hitchens and his ilk: If God does not exist, who cares? Why is it bad if I believe in something that is not scientifically verifiable? I'm not talking about religious extremism; that is obviously bad. I'm talking about basic belief of the "yes or no" variety. If I say "well, I believe that God does exist, because science has its place and that place is not to answer the ultimate questions about the point of our existence", what does it matter? Every single atheist or atheistically-minded person I've ever talked to makes the argument that this would hold back humanity in some way. So to read that disbelief in God does not require a belief about the ideal of the state (intellectual and material progress and whatnot), well...I'm willing to grant you that, but also you'd be the first. I don't really see how that works, but I guess that's only because ultimately every atheist I've ever read about, talked to, listened to, etc. ultimately falls back on this "you must shed your superstitions" idea -- well, WHY? If it's not about something good happening when I do that, then why? Because you can't find God with laboratory equipment? But I don't care about that...I leave work at work!

I'm not sure where you found these atheists of which you speak, maybe in a former or current communist state? Most, though not all, atheists I know tend to follow enlightenment-era philosophical ideals; yes, they will argue against religion and the harm it does, but I don't know anyone who would seek to use the violence of the state to suppress it. Whether or not religion is detrimental to the state, most who embrace the ideals of the enlightenment would argue that the individual's freedom of conscience takes precedence over the interests of the state, rending the question moot. There are obviously exceptions, such as the atheism that arose during communism and even a few technocratic atheists in the west, but in my experience they are a small minority in the west, especially in the United States.

Quote
(Sorry, I don't mean to harangue you, since you don't appear to be making that argument. I'm just not understanding how atheism is preferable to theism if that is not included. Why cheer on the advance of secularism if you don't think man is better off for it? What's the advantage if it isn't about reaching some more advanced state? That everyone will be rational because rationalism is inherently good or something?)

I praise the advance of secularism because, first of all, it seems most probable that it is true and that because of this, it is worth pursuing by its own right. Secondly, I consider dogmatic responses to questions to be entirely unhelpful and unproductive, I would rather that the energy spent defending the dogma of ancient texts be used for an objective pursuit of knowledge through science and reason. Also, I would hope that the realization that this is the only world we have and the only life we live would implore people to make the best of it, rather than living in misery with the hope of better things that will never come.

But I believe that these things must be achieved by knowledge and education; any attempt to use force would be worse than counterproductive. If people believe what they believe because they are compelled by law or threat of violence to do so, then any belief will become destructive, no matter how true it is. Freedom must be valued even above truth.

Quote
Quote
In Nietzsche's social circles, that was true when he said it, it's true for much larger segments of society today and I only see the trend continuing.

Why then do other thinkers such as Huntington make the argument that religious and cultural identities are the new source of conflict in the post-cold war world? What is all of this conflict in the Middle East and exported from there to the West about, then? Maybe Osama Bin Laden was really just frustrated about the lack of progress in education in his part of the world? Or do a billion people (or many more billions, if you count all religious believers as being a homogenous group by virtue of a common belief in something) not matter because they're not part of the "civilized world", as you alluded to in the part of your reply about the Muslim world?

I don't know that these thinkers are wrong on this particular point. Until the cold-war era, these questions and philosophical debates were largely the province of the upper classes, few in the lower classes or even growing middle class (outside academia, at least) had the time, money, or inclination to involve themselves in these philosophical debates that became common place amongst the upper classes of the 19th century. Through academia, and largely thanks to the GI Bill, atheism and agnosticism were slowly introduced to the middle class during the cold war, very slowly at first but the rate has increased. People like Dawkins, Hitchens, et al. are really the first populist atheists, or at least represent the first large-scale populist atheistic movement. Their target audiences aren't the landed nobles or titans of industry, but the common man; their insistence on the rational abilities of the common man are probably also why the movement is so strongly steeped in enlightenment-era philosophy, it is one of the few philosophical systems that truly treat all members of a society as equals.

Quote
It's easy to look at America and Europe and say that secularism will win the day. Well, America and Europe are not the world. I would think that our current war against radical Islamic terrorism would drive that point home, but it seems that all many people have gotten out of it is "religion bad".

It's just as easy to look at the Islamic world today and see Europe during the Reformation; of course, unlike Europe during the Reformation, there is significant outside pressure towards more secularism in the Islamic world today. History has also taught us the path towards secularism from religion, namely education and the empowerment of women (both of which undermine the heart of fundamentalism, namely poverty). And none of this is to say that I predict the complete demise of all religious belief, merely a paradigm shift where society informs religion rather than religion informing society (we're already seeing this in the West, especially amongst the Protestants and more slowly amongst the Catholics and Orthodox); once that shift occurs, I think a society can be fairly considered to be secular.
« Last Edit: December 19, 2011, 05:00:19 PM by GiC » Logged

"The liberties of people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them." -- Patrick Henry
GiC
Resident Atheist
Site Supporter
Merarches
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Mathematician
Posts: 9,490



« Reply #62 on: December 19, 2011, 05:05:13 PM »

Quote
But the true driving power is education, a more educated populace is a less religious populace and I see very little chance that the role of education and knowledge in our society will diminish in the coming century
Wow GiC, you usually dont weild such a blunt instrument.......

PP

When addressing an entire society (or, more accurately, an entire group of societies) in a single paragraph, only a relative amount of precision is possible. As with any general social rule, there will always be numerous exceptions on both sides.
Logged

"The liberties of people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them." -- Patrick Henry
primuspilus
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Antiochian Orthodox Archdiocese of North America - Western Rite Orthodox
Posts: 5,840


Inserting personal quote here.


WWW
« Reply #63 on: December 19, 2011, 05:07:08 PM »

Quote
But the true driving power is education, a more educated populace is a less religious populace and I see very little chance that the role of education and knowledge in our society will diminish in the coming century
Wow GiC, you usually dont weild such a blunt instrument.......

PP

When addressing an entire society (or, more accurately, an entire group of societies) in a single paragraph, only a relative amount of precision is possible. As with any general social rule, there will always be numerous exceptions on both sides.
Fair enough.

PP
Logged

"I confidently affirm that whoever calls himself Universal Bishop is the precursor of Antichrist"
Gregory the Great
GiC
Resident Atheist
Site Supporter
Merarches
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Mathematician
Posts: 9,490



« Reply #64 on: December 19, 2011, 05:12:24 PM »

But the true driving power is education propaganda, a more educated brainwashed populace is a less religious populace


I fixed your sentence above to clarify what I suspect you really mean.



"Education is a weapon, whose effect depends on who holds it in his hands and at whom it is aimed." -Joseph Stalin-

"Our educational policy must enable everyone who receives an education to develop morally, intellectually and physically and become a worker with both socialist consciousness and culture." -Mao Tse Tung-[On the Correct Handling of Contradictions Among the People (February 27, 1959), 1st pocket ed., p. 44.]

"As for education for cadres whether at work or in schools for cadres, a policy should be established of focusing such education on the study of the practical problems of the Chinese revolution and using the basic principles of Marxism-Leninism as the guide, and the method of studying Marxism-Leninism statically and in isolation should be discarded." -Mao Tse Tung-
["Reform Our Study" (May 1941), Selected Works, Vol. III, p. 24.]

"Through clever and constant application of propaganda, people can be made to see paradise as hell, and also the other way round".  -Adolf Hitler- [Mein Kampf page 376]

Education under Pol Pot
http://www.freemediaproductions.info/Lyceum/showthread.php?t=9676

Goebbels Principles of Propaganda
http://www.psywarrior.com/Goebbels.html


You see, "education" is too generic and too amorphous of a term. Great lies and great evils have been perpetrated in the name of "education." Politicians love to talk about education, because they understand that nobody will oppose "education." And they cleverly construct and pass all manner of immoral and godless legislation by euphemistically labeling their propaganda as "education." So, I'm not one to fall for that trick. Better to be an ignorant savage than an educated fool.

Selam

I'm not the one confusing education and propaganda here. When I speak of education, I generally refer to mathematical and scientific education, facts that the person being educated can verify through either repeated experiment or reason; not that I oppose other types of education, I'm even OK with state-sponsored religious education so long as it is broadly taught and equally represents all of the world's major religions and philosophies without bias; it is up to the student to choose the philosophy his or her conscience dictates, not the professor or state-paid educator. I have great faith and confidence in individuals, so long as they are not acting collectively.
Logged

"The liberties of people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them." -- Patrick Henry
katherineofdixie
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 2,992



« Reply #65 on: December 19, 2011, 05:16:53 PM »

I'm going to stir the pot a bit.

For starters, I'm glad he's gone. He was a drunken, genocidal coward, a self-aggrandizing misogynistic idiot, a callous ends-justify-the-means imperialist, a neoconservative shill who eagerly abandoned his intellectual principles whenever they came into conflict with his all-pervasive hatred of Islam and Muslims, and a smirking, self-congratulatory sexist. The world is better off without men like him in it.

Hitchens, who conclusively proves, as if it needed more any more evidence in its favor, that Americans will assume intelligence on the part of anything with a British accent, given the ferver with which people accepted his self-righteous posturing as intelligent thought. He constantly celebrated the deaths of others and bad-mouthed the recently-deceased. He made a point of it. He argued that offense was a completely meaningless concept and only hurts robust discussion. Anyone getting pious over this is being self-serving as all gently caress.

And yet I haven't even delved into his atheist rhetoric which had the depth of a children's swimming pool. He constantly railed against religion without even the slightest comprehension on the basic tenets of each faith. Young impressionable atheists were ever so swept by his false grandeur of logic and reason. In fact Hitchens may be the single reason why atheism has a worse reputation. Him and Dawkins both were/are exceptionally rude about there not being a god to the point of being obnoxious about it.

Good riddance.



Thank you!
Logged

"If but ten of us lead a holy life, we shall kindle a fire which shall light up the entire city."

 St. John Chrysostom
Gebre Menfes Kidus
"SERVANT of The HOLY SPIRIT"
Warned
Taxiarches
**********
Online Online

Faith: Ethiopian Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Orthodox Tewahedo / Non-Chalcedonian
Posts: 7,824


"Lord Have Mercy on Me a Sinner!"


WWW
« Reply #66 on: December 19, 2011, 05:24:28 PM »

But the true driving power is education propaganda, a more educated brainwashed populace is a less religious populace


I fixed your sentence above to clarify what I suspect you really mean.



"Education is a weapon, whose effect depends on who holds it in his hands and at whom it is aimed." -Joseph Stalin-

"Our educational policy must enable everyone who receives an education to develop morally, intellectually and physically and become a worker with both socialist consciousness and culture." -Mao Tse Tung-[On the Correct Handling of Contradictions Among the People (February 27, 1959), 1st pocket ed., p. 44.]

"As for education for cadres whether at work or in schools for cadres, a policy should be established of focusing such education on the study of the practical problems of the Chinese revolution and using the basic principles of Marxism-Leninism as the guide, and the method of studying Marxism-Leninism statically and in isolation should be discarded." -Mao Tse Tung-
["Reform Our Study" (May 1941), Selected Works, Vol. III, p. 24.]

"Through clever and constant application of propaganda, people can be made to see paradise as hell, and also the other way round".  -Adolf Hitler- [Mein Kampf page 376]

Education under Pol Pot
http://www.freemediaproductions.info/Lyceum/showthread.php?t=9676

Goebbels Principles of Propaganda
http://www.psywarrior.com/Goebbels.html


You see, "education" is too generic and too amorphous of a term. Great lies and great evils have been perpetrated in the name of "education." Politicians love to talk about education, because they understand that nobody will oppose "education." And they cleverly construct and pass all manner of immoral and godless legislation by euphemistically labeling their propaganda as "education." So, I'm not one to fall for that trick. Better to be an ignorant savage than an educated fool.

Selam

I'm not the one confusing education and propaganda here. When I speak of education, I generally refer to mathematical and scientific education, facts that the person being educated can verify through either repeated experiment or reason; not that I oppose other types of education, I'm even OK with state-sponsored religious education so long as it is broadly taught and equally represents all of the world's major religions and philosophies without bias; it is up to the student to choose the philosophy his or her conscience dictates, not the professor or state-paid educator. I have great faith and confidence in individuals, so long as they are not acting collectively.

But who are you to decide what constitutes proper education? What gives you the authority to define education for the rest of us?


Selam
Logged

“Lord, I say too many uncharitable things about people every day. I say them because they make me look clever. Help me to realize how cheap this is. I am stupid, quite as stupid as the people I ridicule. Help me to stop this selfishness, because I love You dear God." ~ FLANNERY O'CONNOR ~
Sleeper
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,216

On hiatus for the foreseeable future.


« Reply #67 on: December 19, 2011, 05:28:26 PM »

Perhaps the educated are less likely to believe here in the West, but I have read studies that show a different trend in places like China, where the more educated a person is, the likelier they are to have religious belief.
Logged
primuspilus
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Antiochian Orthodox Archdiocese of North America - Western Rite Orthodox
Posts: 5,840


Inserting personal quote here.


WWW
« Reply #68 on: December 19, 2011, 05:36:42 PM »

I mean afterall, famous idiots in history believed in a God of some type like Einstein, Newton, Pasteur, even the atheist god himself, Darwin.

But if they were more educated they'd have been atheists.....

 Roll Eyes

PP
Logged

"I confidently affirm that whoever calls himself Universal Bishop is the precursor of Antichrist"
Gregory the Great
dzheremi
Protokentarchos
*********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Coptic
Posts: 4,027


« Reply #69 on: December 19, 2011, 05:38:46 PM »

Quote
How do you confuse the expression of his opinion with 'actively destroying religion'?


What are you talking about? Why is the phrase "actively destroying religion" in scare quotes, as though that is a point I ever tried to make? If you re-read what I wrote, you'll see that I am trying to remind you that these people are impacting society, not being impartial observers of trends that exist independently of the writings that they have produced. And, yes, those writings are about getting rid of religion for its supposed negative influence on society, but actively destroying religion is going too far (hence I never used those words). A book can't actively do anything. Don't misrepresent what I've written in order to fit some unrelated point about laws and how you think I want to deny secularists rights and all that. I never wrote anything close to that. I'm not looking to destroy anybody. In case you missed it, I'm pro-secularism, just not pro-atheism disguising itself as enlightenment.

Quote
I'm not sure where you found these atheists of which you speak, maybe in a former or current communist state? Most, though not all, atheists I know tend to follow enlightenment-era philosophical ideals; yes, they will argue against religion and the harm it does, but I don't know anyone who would seek to use the violence of the state to suppress it.


Who is talking about state violence in the suppression of religion? I brought up the ex-Soviet Union as an example of a place where something that was supposedly fated to happen didn't happen (to illustrate why I am leery of claims about the inevitable victory of this or that ideology), but that has nothing to do with state suppression of religion (at least not directly). Instead, I wanted to know what the problem is if I believe in something that is not scientific. Why does it matter?

Quote
I praise the advance of secularism because, first of all, it seems most probable that it is true and that because of this, it is worth pursuing by its own right.


A fair point, but I am confused as to why this love of the search for truth should exclude people who believe that religion is true. A great many pre-scientific (pre-modern) theories on the origin of the world or various things within it were formulated by men of great religious faith and they were no less a search for truth than the modern secularist or atheist's search for truth.

Quote
Their target audiences aren't the landed nobles or titans of industry, but the common man; their insistence on the rational abilities of the common man are probably also why the movement is so strongly steeped in enlightenment-era philosophy, it is one of the few philosophical systems that truly treat all members of a society as equals.

I disagree, as much of the modern discourse precludes any religious viewpoint by virtue of its assumed 'superstition' (as though we all agree that the world of the academician or scientist and the believer are polar opposites; I have yet to observe that in reality at any level of higher education). But you are right insofar as atheism has a popular support now that it did not have before.

Quote
It's just as easy to look at the Islamic world today and see Europe during the Reformation; of course, unlike Europe during the Reformation, there is significant outside pressure towards more secularism in the Islamic world today.


Is this a general statement, or in anticipation of a reply along those lines? Because I don't buy this idea that the Islamic world is in some kind of reformation right now akin to the Protestant reformation. I think that's hogwash and wishful thinking on the part of the Reza Aslans of the world who are in denial concerning the true nature of the conflict between Islam and the rest of the world.

Quote
History has also taught us the path towards secularism from religion, namely education and the empowerment of women (both of which undermine the heart of fundamentalism, namely poverty). And none of this is to say that I predict the complete demise of all religious belief, merely a paradigm shift where society informs religion rather than religion informing society (we're already seeing this in the West, especially amongst the Protestants and more slowly amongst the Catholics and Orthodox); once that shift occurs, I think a society can be fairly considered to be secular.

By that definition I think it is undeniable that society as a whole is already secular (at least with regard to America and, from what I've been able to glean from people who live there, Europe).
« Last Edit: December 19, 2011, 05:40:03 PM by dzheremi » Logged

Marc1152
Toumarches
************
Online Online

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Rocor
Posts: 11,865


Probiotic .. Antibiotic


« Reply #70 on: December 19, 2011, 06:10:39 PM »

Well, isn't he surprised today!

He's dead...no more surprises. The computer that was his brain is rotting away and no longer capable of computation and thus no longer capable of realization, understanding, or surprise. It's the fate that awaits us all. Wink

His intellect may be missed, but he knew that the hear and now is all there is to our existence, he lived life to its fullest, and he took no half measures, in the end that's all we can ask out of life.

Most of that is probably untrue, based on the evidence for survival of death and an afterlife.. Welcome to reality.

I wonder what he thought the moment after his death when he discovered his soul had  survived? ... Maybe i'll start a thread
Logged

\"Why were so many Civil War battles fought in National Parks? \"
Marc1152
Toumarches
************
Online Online

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Rocor
Posts: 11,865


Probiotic .. Antibiotic


« Reply #71 on: December 19, 2011, 06:19:58 PM »

Hitchens simply stated that 'god' throughout history has never been a positive influence on society, that the belief in such a god has historically been damaging and unproductive.

Wasn't it The Church that first began  Universities and Hospitals? Wasn't it the emphasis on education within Judaism that led to the raising up of some of our brightest people? I think you have to skim through History very carelessly believe as Hitchens did. 
Logged

\"Why were so many Civil War battles fought in National Parks? \"
That person
OC.net guru
*******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Catechumen
Jurisdiction: Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese of North America
Posts: 1,155


Long live Commie Superman


« Reply #72 on: December 19, 2011, 06:42:23 PM »

I will NEVER understand Bill Maher's appeal. He is a joke. A horrible stand up. A worse B movie actor.

Why people think the guy is edgy, I will never know.

The TWO times he ever said something with a hint of edge, he cried crocodile tears afterward and gave a mea culpa.

Politically Incorrect my ([redacted comments about the rules governing the use language on the forum to suggest the word I was going to use]).

Agreed brother.


Selam

Same here. And I can't stand Dawkins either.

- GTA
I'm fairly certain that Dawkins is either stupid, dishonest, or both. Whatever happened to the intelligent atheists of old?
The Dawkins of "The Selfish Gene," "The Blind Watchmaker," and "The Greatest Show on Earth" seems perfectly honest and intelligent. Then you get to the Dawkins of "The God Delusion" and "The Root of All Evil," and it becomes apparent that he stepped deep into unfamiliar territory when he affiliated himself with the New Atheist movement. Of course, New Atheism tends to value shock at least as much as it does. soundness when it comes to arguments, so Dawkins manages to blend in pretty well in spite of massive shortcomings in knowledge of religion.

As for Mr. Hitchens, I'm not entirely sure what to think.  The man had incredible guts, given his willingness to be water-boarded to prove a point, to change his mind on that point afterwards, and to always call out BS whenever he saw it. On the other hand, he had a nasty tendency to see BS when there was none and to act like an arrogant dick about pretty much everything, to say nothing about his straight-out-of-the-19th-century imperialism and condescension to Mahometanism and Popery. He was obviously a very bold and bright guy, but much of his life and intellect seem to have been entirely wasted. May the Lord have mercy on him.
Logged

"Some have such command of their bowels, that they can break wind continuously at pleasure, so as to produce the effect of singing."- St. Augustine of Hippo

Movie reviews you can trust.
GiC
Resident Atheist
Site Supporter
Merarches
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Mathematician
Posts: 9,490



« Reply #73 on: December 19, 2011, 08:03:58 PM »

Well, isn't he surprised today!

He's dead...no more surprises. The computer that was his brain is rotting away and no longer capable of computation and thus no longer capable of realization, understanding, or surprise. It's the fate that awaits us all. Wink

His intellect may be missed, but he knew that the hear and now is all there is to our existence, he lived life to its fullest, and he took no half measures, in the end that's all we can ask out of life.

Most of that is probably untrue, based on the evidence for survival of death and an afterlife.. Welcome to reality.

I wonder what he thought the moment after his death when he discovered his soul had  survived? ... Maybe i'll start a thread

I'm not quite ready to hold my breath.

Hitchens simply stated that 'god' throughout history has never been a positive influence on society, that the belief in such a god has historically been damaging and unproductive.

Wasn't it The Church that first began  Universities and Hospitals? Wasn't it the emphasis on education within Judaism that led to the raising up of some of our brightest people? I think you have to skim through History very carelessly believe as Hitchens did. 

The Church merely resurrected the related ancient Greek and Roman institutions which they had previously destroyed and ultimately, I think it was the intellectual tradition of certain segments of Ancient Greek society, not Judaism, that helped give birth to the educational infrastructure that allowed our brightest people to be educated.
Logged

"The liberties of people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them." -- Patrick Henry
akimori makoto
正義の剣
Archon
********
Offline Offline

Faith: Non-heretical Christian
Jurisdiction: Fully-sik-hektic archdiocese of Australia, bro
Posts: 3,126

No-one bound by fleshly pleasures is worthy ...


« Reply #74 on: December 19, 2011, 08:07:39 PM »

The Church merely resurrected the related ancient Greek and Roman institutions which they had previously destroyed and ultimately, I think it was the intellectual tradition of certain segments of Ancient Greek society, not Judaism, that helped give birth to the educational infrastructure that allowed our brightest people to be educated.

Keep romanticising the ancients, GiC.

The ever-lauded ancients were the ones who killed Socrates, as much as any mob of Copts killed Hypatia.
Logged

The Episcopallian road is easy and wide, for many go through it to find destruction. lol sorry channeling Isa.
GiC
Resident Atheist
Site Supporter
Merarches
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Mathematician
Posts: 9,490



« Reply #75 on: December 19, 2011, 08:15:03 PM »

The Church merely resurrected the related ancient Greek and Roman institutions which they had previously destroyed and ultimately, I think it was the intellectual tradition of certain segments of Ancient Greek society, not Judaism, that helped give birth to the educational infrastructure that allowed our brightest people to be educated.

Keep romanticising the ancients, GiC.

The ever-lauded ancients were the ones who killed Socrates, as much as any mob of Copts killed Hypatia.

They were far from perfect, I don't know that we could even call them civilized, but they built the foundation of civilization and placed humanity on the path it enjoys today. A foundation that the Church tried very hard to tear down; so it's not surprising that some during the middle ages realized the folly of their age and decided to reestablish some of the ancient institutions that had been destroyed, either by the axes of barbarians or in the pursuit of piety.
Logged

"The liberties of people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them." -- Patrick Henry
Marc1152
Toumarches
************
Online Online

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Rocor
Posts: 11,865


Probiotic .. Antibiotic


« Reply #76 on: December 19, 2011, 09:34:21 PM »

Well, isn't he surprised today!

He's dead...no more surprises. The computer that was his brain is rotting away and no longer capable of computation and thus no longer capable of realization, understanding, or surprise. It's the fate that awaits us all. Wink

His intellect may be missed, but he knew that the hear and now is all there is to our existence, he lived life to its fullest, and he took no half measures, in the end that's all we can ask out of life.

Most of that is probably untrue, based on the evidence for survival of death and an afterlife.. Welcome to reality.

I wonder what he thought the moment after his death when he discovered his soul had  survived? ... Maybe i'll start a thread

I'm not quite ready to hold my breath.

Hitchens simply stated that 'god' throughout history has never been a positive influence on society, that the belief in such a god has historically been damaging and unproductive.

Wasn't it The Church that first began  Universities and Hospitals? Wasn't it the emphasis on education within Judaism that led to the raising up of some of our brightest people? I think you have to skim through History very carelessly believe as Hitchens did. 

The Church merely resurrected the related ancient Greek and Roman institutions which they had previously destroyed and ultimately, I think it was the intellectual tradition of certain segments of Ancient Greek society, not Judaism, that helped give birth to the educational infrastructure that allowed our brightest people to be educated.

i guess you didnt follow my point..That's fine.. I'm not in the mood to argue right now
Logged

\"Why were so many Civil War battles fought in National Parks? \"
vorgos
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Posts: 193


« Reply #77 on: December 20, 2011, 07:19:17 AM »

The Church merely resurrected the related ancient Greek and Roman institutions which they had previously destroyed and ultimately, I think it was the intellectual tradition of certain segments of Ancient Greek society, not Judaism, that helped give birth to the educational infrastructure that allowed our brightest people to be educated.

Keep romanticising the ancients, GiC.

The ever-lauded ancients were the ones who killed Socrates, as much as any mob of Copts killed Hypatia.

They were far from perfect, I don't know that we could even call them civilized, but they built the foundation of civilization and placed humanity on the path it enjoys today. A foundation that the Church tried very hard to tear down; so it's not surprising that some during the middle ages realized the folly of their age and decided to reestablish some of the ancient institutions that had been destroyed, either by the axes of barbarians or in the pursuit of piety.

GiC's post got me thinking so I googled a bit. I came across this little gem.

http://mwillett.org/atheism/christian-civilization.htm

Religion! What is it good for? Absolutely nothing!

« Last Edit: December 20, 2011, 07:19:40 AM by vorgos » Logged
Shiny
Site Supporter
Banned
Toumarches
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Groucho Marxist
Jurisdiction: Dahntahn Stoop Haus
Posts: 13,267


Paint It Red


« Reply #78 on: December 20, 2011, 10:29:11 AM »

The Blind Watchmaker is an amazing book. How the hell did he go from that to the God Delusion? Perplexing to say the least.

But him too is another despicable human being. I recall his confrontation with William Lane Craig in a "debate" in Mexico where he wouldn't even shake WLC's hand when it was offered and said something extremely rude. Then there was the kid in a wheelchair who called him out about how arrogant he was about there not being a god. There are so many reports of him being ridicously obnoxious.
 
But you know being an ***hole is a great argument for atheism Richard, keep that up and I'm sure there will be plenty of atheists in no time!
Logged

“There is your brother, naked, crying, and you stand there confused over the choice of an attractive floor covering.”

– St. Ambrose of Milan
Marc1152
Toumarches
************
Online Online

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Rocor
Posts: 11,865


Probiotic .. Antibiotic


« Reply #79 on: December 20, 2011, 10:37:41 AM »

The Church merely resurrected the related ancient Greek and Roman institutions which they had previously destroyed and ultimately, I think it was the intellectual tradition of certain segments of Ancient Greek society, not Judaism, that helped give birth to the educational infrastructure that allowed our brightest people to be educated.

Keep romanticising the ancients, GiC.

The ever-lauded ancients were the ones who killed Socrates, as much as any mob of Copts killed Hypatia.

They were far from perfect, I don't know that we could even call them civilized, but they built the foundation of civilization and placed humanity on the path it enjoys today. A foundation that the Church tried very hard to tear down; so it's not surprising that some during the middle ages realized the folly of their age and decided to reestablish some of the ancient institutions that had been destroyed, either by the axes of barbarians or in the pursuit of piety.

GiC's post got me thinking so I googled a bit. I came across this little gem.

http://mwillett.org/atheism/christian-civilization.htm

Religion! What is it good for? Absolutely nothing!



This line was the funniest:  "Of course Rome was not a perfect civilization and a perfect society."
Logged

\"Why were so many Civil War battles fought in National Parks? \"
primuspilus
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Antiochian Orthodox Archdiocese of North America - Western Rite Orthodox
Posts: 5,840


Inserting personal quote here.


WWW
« Reply #80 on: December 20, 2011, 11:42:05 AM »

Quote
The Church merely resurrected the related ancient Greek and Roman institutions which they had previously destroyed and ultimately, I think it was the intellectual tradition of certain segments of Ancient Greek society, not Judaism, that helped give birth to the educational infrastructure that allowed our brightest people to be educated
I had no idea that folks started reading history books from the middle.

PP
Logged

"I confidently affirm that whoever calls himself Universal Bishop is the precursor of Antichrist"
Gregory the Great
Balthasar
Elder
*****
Offline Offline

Faith: Christian
Jurisdiction: Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church
Posts: 262



« Reply #81 on: December 20, 2011, 01:31:40 PM »


„He will be missed!“? This must be a joke. What do you miss him for? For his „intellect“ …. wooow, where did he get the intellect that told him to reject the Almighty God from? I am pretty sure he got it from Satan. So, why can someone be missed who rejected God, who blasphemed the Holy Spirit and who to the end tirelessly mocked the followers of Christ?

A couple of months ago I watched a stupid debate between him and the unholy-Spirited ex-Premier, Tony Blair. The whole debate was organized to lift up the spirit and ego of Mr. Hitchins. The guests in the room were purposely selected by the organizers to give rounds of applause to the rhetoric-obsessed Hitchins. And they all looked stupid and primitive, as they use the same old boring trick to mock beliefs and believers. Of course, at the end of the debate he was declared the winner – against religion, perhaps, against God.

I truly prefer a softly-spoken, stuttering nobody – like Moses – to the pseudo-wisemen á la Hicthins. This world doesn't need loud arrogant talkative individuals anymore. Who is louder than the rest at the moment? Atheists, Gays and Muslims. Frankly speaking, the world doesn't need them right now.

With his painful illness, mr. Hitchins had a better chance to know and learn God. He was given a chance to repent. But, he didn't. By refusing to do so he continued leading many astray. He was a public figure, and was supposed to repent publicly. Can you imagine how many lost souls could have been saved, if he had said before his death, “I am very sorry, I was wrong for denying God...”? No, he didn't repent, Hitler, Stalin, Mohammad never repented, his other hatemonger brothers and sisters in satan, like R. Dawkins and Madalyn Murray O'Hair continue their battle against the Christian God. King David calls them “fools”, and the scripture tells us these individuals land in hell. They will meet their master, satan, over there. The interesting thing is, it would be satan their master, who himself believes in the existence of God, that will be the first to great and accuse them why they didn't acknowledge Go while on Earth.

Please understand that I don't condemn anyone, for the Bible condemns all of us as guilty, dirty, rotten, hell-deserving sinners.

Rest assured friend, though he is dead his message will endure, even today the glorious message of secularism is reshaping the face of Europe, making strong inroads into the United States, and will eventually overtake the inferior belief structures that came before throughout the entire civilized world. But all in good time.

You're exactly proving my point; The communists used to dream of taking the whole world, the jihadists, the atheists and gays would like to do the same. All of these crooks know nothing but to steal and destroy nature, human souls. I wouldn't be surprised if you threaten believers with "I will kill you, convert or die!" nonsense.



 
Logged
Marc1152
Toumarches
************
Online Online

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Rocor
Posts: 11,865


Probiotic .. Antibiotic


« Reply #82 on: December 20, 2011, 01:41:31 PM »


„He will be missed!“? This must be a joke. What do you miss him for? For his „intellect“ …. wooow, where did he get the intellect that told him to reject the Almighty God from? I am pretty sure he got it from Satan. So, why can someone be missed who rejected God, who blasphemed the Holy Spirit and who to the end tirelessly mocked the followers of Christ?

A couple of months ago I watched a stupid debate between him and the unholy-Spirited ex-Premier, Tony Blair. The whole debate was organized to lift up the spirit and ego of Mr. Hitchins. The guests in the room were purposely selected by the organizers to give rounds of applause to the rhetoric-obsessed Hitchins. And they all looked stupid and primitive, as they use the same old boring trick to mock beliefs and believers. Of course, at the end of the debate he was declared the winner – against religion, perhaps, against God.

I truly prefer a softly-spoken, stuttering nobody – like Moses – to the pseudo-wisemen á la Hicthins. This world doesn't need loud arrogant talkative individuals anymore. Who is louder than the rest at the moment? Atheists, Gays and Muslims. Frankly speaking, the world doesn't need them right now.

With his painful illness, mr. Hitchins had a better chance to know and learn God. He was given a chance to repent. But, he didn't. By refusing to do so he continued leading many astray. He was a public figure, and was supposed to repent publicly. Can you imagine how many lost souls could have been saved, if he had said before his death, “I am very sorry, I was wrong for denying God...”? No, he didn't repent, Hitler, Stalin, Mohammad never repented, his other hatemonger brothers and sisters in satan, like R. Dawkins and Madalyn Murray O'Hair continue their battle against the Christian God. King David calls them “fools”, and the scripture tells us these individuals land in hell. They will meet their master, satan, over there. The interesting thing is, it would be satan their master, who himself believes in the existence of God, that will be the first to great and accuse them why they didn't acknowledge Go while on Earth.

Please understand that I don't condemn anyone, for the Bible condemns all of us as guilty, dirty, rotten, hell-deserving sinners.

Rest assured friend, though he is dead his message will endure, even today the glorious message of secularism is reshaping the face of Europe, making strong inroads into the United States, and will eventually overtake the inferior belief structures that came before throughout the entire civilized world. But all in good time.

You're exactly proving my point; The communists used to dream of taking the whole world, the jihadists, the atheists and gays would like to do the same. All of these crooks know nothing but to steal and destroy nature, human souls. I wouldn't be surprised if you threaten believers with "I will kill you, convert or die!" nonsense.



 

jihadists, the atheists and gays

That combination would make quite an interesting Army

I picture something about like this :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A8yjNbcKkNY&feature=fvsr
Logged

\"Why were so many Civil War battles fought in National Parks? \"
Orest
High Elder
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 872


« Reply #83 on: December 20, 2011, 01:49:24 PM »

I always enjoyed Christopher Hitchens, as wrong as he was. He had a great sense of humor and was one of the few public figures who actually formulated his own opinions rather than following the status quo of any particular movement. A darling of the political left for decades, he alienated his liberal comrades with his wholehearted support of the war in Iraq. He explained his support for George Bush's wars by assessing them as a battle between secularism and theocracy, and in my opinion his assessment was spot on.

Apparrently he maintained his atheistic convictions to his dying breath.

May God have mercy on his soul.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/christopher-hitchens-controversial-author-television-personality-dies/story?id=13214700


Selam

His mother was Jewsish and as far as I know he was not not specifically brought up as a child in any faith although his brother identifies himself as a Christian.
Logged
primuspilus
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: Antiochian Orthodox Archdiocese of North America - Western Rite Orthodox
Posts: 5,840


Inserting personal quote here.


WWW
« Reply #84 on: December 20, 2011, 02:08:01 PM »

Quote
jihadists, the atheists and gays

Soooooooo...would that mean the infantry do not believe in God, but eat kosher, and want purple sequence uniforms?

Their USO shows must be very entertaining.......

PP
Logged

"I confidently affirm that whoever calls himself Universal Bishop is the precursor of Antichrist"
Gregory the Great
pasadi97
High Elder
******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 572


« Reply #85 on: December 26, 2011, 07:05:31 PM »

Nobody can fight against God. They can put at most for a TANTRUM.
Logged
pasadi97
High Elder
******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 572


« Reply #86 on: December 26, 2011, 07:14:03 PM »

I believe I have asked God to show me where Hitchen is and I heard some cries... AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!! probably from hell. The tantrum can take 110 years at most for most people in our life with atheism, abortion, masturbation, smoking, fornication and such.

Its true Eastern orthodoxy has confession that can put people back on track. This needs to be used.
Logged
NicholasMyra
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Antiochian/Greek
Posts: 5,632


Avowed denominationalist


« Reply #87 on: December 26, 2011, 07:15:06 PM »

The Church merely resurrected the related ancient Greek and Roman institutions which they had previously destroyed and ultimately, I think it was the intellectual tradition of certain segments of Ancient Greek society, not Judaism, that helped give birth to the educational infrastructure that allowed our brightest people to be educated.

Keep romanticising the ancients, GiC.

The ever-lauded ancients were the ones who killed Socrates, as much as any mob of Copts killed Hypatia.

They were far from perfect, I don't know that we could even call them civilized, but they built the foundation of civilization and placed humanity on the path it enjoys today. A foundation that the Church tried very hard to tear down; so it's not surprising that some during the middle ages realized the folly of their age and decided to reestablish some of the ancient institutions that had been destroyed, either by the axes of barbarians or in the pursuit of piety.
Been reading too much 17th-19th century pesudohistory, my friend. Put down the Gibbon.
Logged

"...you are the orphan, not the protagonist."

-St. Seraphim of Vyritsa, 'This was from me'
augustin717
Taxiarches
**********
Offline Offline

Faith: The other ROC
Posts: 5,521



« Reply #88 on: December 26, 2011, 07:15:44 PM »

Quote
I believe I have asked God to show me where Hitchen is and I heard some cries... AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!! probably from hell.

Are you sure Adi, it wasn't your neighbours upstairs you heard ?
« Last Edit: December 26, 2011, 07:16:55 PM by augustin717 » Logged
pasadi97
High Elder
******
Offline Offline

Faith: Orthodox
Jurisdiction: OCA
Posts: 572


« Reply #89 on: December 26, 2011, 09:49:52 PM »

They are very quiet.
Anyone can pray to be shown by God what one person state is in after life through prayer and anybody can ask God that this encounter to be with benefit for one or both people.
Also we can ask God whatever we like like if muslim go to heaven or not, which religion is the best, to be forced to salvation and such.
Logged
Tags:
Pages: « 1 2 3 »  All   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.204 seconds with 72 queries.